TBH it's more of a song for who made you interested in iron maiden ppl I know who first heard Paul prefer him I got into maiden listening to bruce I prefer him
Please shut up guys. This song is great with Paul and with Bruce too. Also, you can avoid this song because it wasn't relased on a studio album with Dickinson's voice.
im sorry i know im gonna get killed saying this but i dont like bruce in general and the first 2 maiden albums are real metal and the rest are faggy medieval festival hamlet monologues
I say so... In albums: Iron Maiden and Killers a Bruce's voise is good in studio version where is a clean sound ,but in concerts his voice loses with Paul's voice. Those songs were prepared with a view a Paul and his voice ,so it's for Bruce is so hard to sing, but Bruce gives advice to do it.! Up the Irons !!! \,,/ !!!
@Jacksons172 Actually I would say its pretty easy for Bruce to sing these songs. It would be the other way around, as the songs written with Bruce are far more demanding to sing, due to Bruce having a much wider vocal range. You can say that Paul's voice is more fitting to the oldest songs, but I really doubt they are hard for Bruce to sing.
Sounds better when Bruce does it with clean vocals like he does live and when those silly synthesizers aren't wrecking the rhythm guitar parts. Great song anyway.
Es la primera vez que pongo un no me gusta en algo que se relaciona con Maiden. Dickinson sos el mejor.... con tus canciones y tu etapa. Imposible supertar a Paul con los discos "Iron Maiden" y "Killers". No es tu culpa Bruce, simplemente Dianno la parte al medio en esos discos como vos en el resto.
I think the tracks from the 2 first Iron Maiden albums sounds way much better with Paul on vocals. I know some people disagree, but this is my opinion. The first two albums had a very special and individual sound(especially Killers). And I rate Pauls voice as the main reason for that.
prowler phantom of the opera charlotte the harlot and runing free are better with paul.I prefer bruce with Maiden but dude this songs were like just written for diannos punk voice.
i like both but i grew up with mostly bruce i didnt even know bout paul till i was 10 and my first album was 7th son the 7th son so there for that i heard when i was 7..lolweird..
@YogiPopp cos he's part of maiden and he deserves to do his part on most maiden songs including the first two albums. I think they should re-release iron maiden, killers and the blaze bayley albums with bruce on vocals cos some just prefer bruce all round. I agree Paul does it better but bruce does an epic job with most of the songs.
@paulinaz87 I totally agree! Paul had a great voice. But from what I've heard the reason they got rid of him was that he had problems with cocaine, alcohol & other drugs & at times was too fucked up to perform. Biggest mistake of his life cuz Maiden is one of the most successful metal bands of all times. But not we got Bruce who has a much better range than Paul.But da 1st 2 Maiden album's songs sound better with Paul. Paul probably kicks himself every day for blowing it with Maiden.
TBH it's more of a song for who made you interested in iron maiden ppl I know who first heard Paul prefer him I got into maiden listening to bruce I prefer him
UmaraiL 3 days ago
looked it up cuz of Bruce :D
moartzen 1 week ago
Paul,is balls sorry.
Blaasphemy09 2 weeks ago
sorry sad echo of the original. NUMBER OF THE BEAST excellent but leave the first two albums alone what can i say different voices different courses
scummerlover 2 weeks ago
Please shut up guys. This song is great with Paul and with Bruce too. Also, you can avoid this song because it wasn't relased on a studio album with Dickinson's voice.
ttony33 2 weeks ago
Nope not a Bruce song, Paul song !!!
jbravo41 2 weeks ago
Man, just that:
Bruce are fucking nice, but...
RUNNING FREE, IRON MAIDEN, PHANTOM OF OPERA, PROWLER, just Paul know...
davi4revenge 2 weeks ago
MAIDEN RULE!
xXPunkShitXx 3 weeks ago
it's way BETTER with Paul Di'Anno ;)
slayer2011bs 3 weeks ago
im sorry i know im gonna get killed saying this but i dont like bruce in general and the first 2 maiden albums are real metal and the rest are faggy medieval festival hamlet monologues
markmor09 3 weeks ago
@markmor09 YES! I couldnt agree more! The first two albums had so much more energy. It had a real nice punk feel to it too--largly because of Paul.
FuttBucker667 3 days ago
The original is better
felpen537 1 month ago 3
ok @steinblood you have little reason but not change the fact that Bruce Dickinson is the best singer in the band and even the world!
Jacksons172 1 month ago
agreed paul di'anno's version is better, but with remember tomorrow i prefer bruce dickinson
Mercenary78 1 month ago
I say so... In albums: Iron Maiden and Killers a Bruce's voise is good in studio version where is a clean sound ,but in concerts his voice loses with Paul's voice. Those songs were prepared with a view a Paul and his voice ,so it's for Bruce is so hard to sing, but Bruce gives advice to do it.! Up the Irons !!! \,,/ !!!
Jacksons172 1 month ago
@Jacksons172 Actually I would say its pretty easy for Bruce to sing these songs. It would be the other way around, as the songs written with Bruce are far more demanding to sing, due to Bruce having a much wider vocal range. You can say that Paul's voice is more fitting to the oldest songs, but I really doubt they are hard for Bruce to sing.
steinblood 1 month ago
This is great, but the original is actually better...
Toccaif331 1 month ago
hmm. This song with Bruce is better ;)
Songs with paul: Strange World, Charlotte the Harlot, Phanton of the Opera !!!
Jacksons172 1 month ago
very good !!!!!
AMsPROJECT 2 months ago
Sounds better when Bruce does it with clean vocals like he does live and when those silly synthesizers aren't wrecking the rhythm guitar parts. Great song anyway.
OpFirefield 2 months ago
lml
joemetal154 2 months ago
Eddie's ass is every bit as wrinkly as I had imagined...
Nefelisdiardi 2 months ago 4
@Nefelisdiardi HAhahahahahahahh!!! LOL!!
homemlagosta 1 month ago
Damn lol, Di'Anno is better live than Dick is in the studio!
Corrupt5358 2 months ago 3
Es la primera vez que pongo un no me gusta en algo que se relaciona con Maiden. Dickinson sos el mejor.... con tus canciones y tu etapa. Imposible supertar a Paul con los discos "Iron Maiden" y "Killers". No es tu culpa Bruce, simplemente Dianno la parte al medio en esos discos como vos en el resto.
pabliyo750 3 months ago
Great, but Paul's version is the best!!!
NeoDarkShadowNemesis 4 months ago 4
I think the tracks from the 2 first Iron Maiden albums sounds way much better with Paul on vocals. I know some people disagree, but this is my opinion. The first two albums had a very special and individual sound(especially Killers). And I rate Pauls voice as the main reason for that.
WarthDader74 4 months ago
this version sucks
lkkjhg45 5 months ago
bruce sings better than paul, his voice its special, paul was great but his voice its so normal for iron maiden
Rxxx0 6 months ago
prowler phantom of the opera charlotte the harlot and runing free are better with paul.I prefer bruce with Maiden but dude this songs were like just written for diannos punk voice.
orlandohoward12 7 months ago
i like both but i grew up with mostly bruce i didnt even know bout paul till i was 10 and my first album was 7th son the 7th son so there for that i heard when i was 7..lolweird..
MegaSpeedy777 7 months ago
@YogiPopp cos he's part of maiden and he deserves to do his part on most maiden songs including the first two albums. I think they should re-release iron maiden, killers and the blaze bayley albums with bruce on vocals cos some just prefer bruce all round. I agree Paul does it better but bruce does an epic job with most of the songs.
MistyShadow007 7 months ago
total shit...
di anno uber fucking alles!
barkingwolf1 8 months ago
Bruce voice is classical, and epic. but...
Paul voice is a bit more edgy, punk, so this album belong to paul, the glory, to Maiden.
Up the irons!
ElysianHorus 9 months ago
Canta exelente Bruce pero esta cancion no le biene
nicolasbouldres 10 months ago
no puede haber comparacion entre paul y bruce los dos son excepcionales a su propio estilo los dos son grandes a su estilo y siempre lo seran
MrLaea 10 months ago
No need of this song so done.
THE ONLY, THE ORIGINAL, THE BEST is with Di Anno vocals.
Outlander999 10 months ago
alright well i listened to paul sing this but now swithching to this, holy shit bruce competes the bands
MetalHead61689 10 months ago
best pic ever :D
prasnatsmokarparcal 10 months ago
This is one of the few songs that is better on Paul´s voice...
gustavo7amo 1 year ago 31
@gustavo7amo wratchild too
Fulanogt500 6 months ago
this song is the best with paul (only!!!)
paulinaz87 1 year ago 48
@paulinaz87 and with Clive Burr on Drums!!!!!!!!!
JohnHenryBonham1948 4 weeks ago
@paulinaz87 I totally agree! Paul had a great voice. But from what I've heard the reason they got rid of him was that he had problems with cocaine, alcohol & other drugs & at times was too fucked up to perform. Biggest mistake of his life cuz Maiden is one of the most successful metal bands of all times. But not we got Bruce who has a much better range than Paul.But da 1st 2 Maiden album's songs sound better with Paul. Paul probably kicks himself every day for blowing it with Maiden.
tarmonkey666 1 week ago
this song is for james hetfield he sounds perfect but i dont remember where i found that cover
johnthegreek178 1 year ago
@johnthegreek178 dunno if this is what u were looking for but james is brutal on this one
watch?v=V0K0Ax-sBfI
ttappourokolou 1 year ago
@ttappourokolou watch?v=pFPoOv_X_7Q is what I meant :D
johnthegreek178 1 year ago
Bruce is OK but he's not god, I think if Andre Mattos sing this song he could do better than Bruce.
Mordruit 1 year ago
i like it better with bruce. paul is good but u will never find anyone like bruce
RockStarEnergy97 1 year ago
@RockStarEnergy97 Both versions are good but BRUCE IS THE BEST.
Chemicalwarfare84 1 year ago