@dumass4848 People often get the theory of relativity confused with his philosophical quest to defne reality through quantum mechanics which has two forms the physical and the metaphysical' The metaphysical relates to the principles of nature in perceptionn and how consciousness can be effected' which has everything to to do with Intrinsic Anthropology'
1. E=MC2 is not "the theory of relativity". It is the mass-energy equivelance equation. Relativity is something entirely different.
2. E=MC2 pointed out that a small amount of matter contains an enormous amount of energy, but that's all. It wasn't some magic formula that showed how to construct a fission weapon. Einstein had absolutely nothing to do with developing the Atomic Bomb.
una cosa es la ciencia donde se adquieren conocimientos y se lo organiza y otra pero muy diferente es la tecnologia, quien seria "la practica de esos onocimientos" pero quien es el responsable entonces..?? pues yo lo digo : ninguno. el responsable por la bomba atomica no es quien la ideó, quien ayudoa en la idea de su fabricacion o a su existencia,el responsable de la bomba atomica fue: quien la fabrico realmente, fisicamente, la hizo en la práctica y el mandante de tal hecho porsupuesto.
una cosa es la ciencia donde se adquieren conocimientos y se lo organiza y otra pero muy diferentees la tecnologia, quien seria "la practica de esos onocimientos" pero quien es el responsable entonces..?? pues yo ol digo : ninguno. el responsable por la bomba atomica no es quien la ideo, quien ayudoa la idea de su fabricacion o a su xistencia,el responsable de la bomba atomica fue: quien la fabrico realmente, fisicamente, la hizo en la práctica y el mandante de tal hecho porsupuesto.
"The hydrogen bomb appeared on the public horizon as a [fallback to the?] attainable good..."
Quoted from funknotik a few comments down:
"...Its accelerated development has been [following....-ly] by the president. Its successful radioactive poisoning of the atmosphere and hence annihilation of any life on earth has been brought within the range of technical possibility."
Oh, it's all right: Einstein is sorry. He's sorry he did give nuclear weapons to the dull-brained Americans! Well, that's all right, then, Einstein. Sit down. Have a scone. Make yourself at home. You klutz! You stupid, bird-brained, flat-headed--
@FireEyedMaidOfWar Trollololololololol... and that's giving you the benefit of the doubt.
All Einstein did was expand our knowledge. He investigated nuclear physics, and others took his conclusions and used them to cause suffering. If you look at his philosophy, the last thing he ever would want was to cause more suffering in the world. He deeply regretted this, you can't say it's his fault. That's like holding the inventor of metal buildings accountable for concentration camps.
@MrProgrampro: Not his fault? So he could write this obscene letter to the American supreme cry-baby Roosevelt (and his fiend-like Queen Eleanor) which did inform the dull-brained American for the first time of the existence of nuclear weapons without being held responsible for the consequences?
However, Einstein did what he did because he knew of the great and highly-likely danger that the Germans were likewise advancing nuclear research, and the knew that Hitler would undoubtedly be willing to use a nuke. He was sorry, but his justification was valid. If we hadn't developed the bomb and germany had, it would've meant the global realization of the third reich
In hindsight, criticism is easy, but at the time stakes were high
@MrProgrampro: Hard to tell, as Hitler had very little love for the “Jewish” science physics and embraced rather the German science of chemistry, so the only person working on nuclear weapons was Heisenberg in a small laboratory; and I do not think that a German global conquest would have been worse than the American hegemony! Remember: Every year 10 million people starve due to the American ideas about economy around the world every year!
@FireEyedMaidOfWar Well, Einstein had reason to believe that Hitler was working on it. That's enough for me to consider him exempt.
Also "and I do not think that a German global conquest would have been worse than the American hegemony! Remember: Every year 10 million people starve due to the American ideas about economy around the world every year! "?? What? Can I at least have a source?
There is not lies in my words..........The son of God is the Lord.Albert Einstein was ,-nothing but a man.And man is nothing compare to the one who we know as the eternal guiding light.Is truth ......The doings of the hand of man are great and many,but all of this are nothing without the intervention.permission and authority of that one whom knows all,the son.......In my words there is no lies.
"It's accelerated development has been fallen leapfrog broccoli by the president. It's successful radioactive poisoning of the atmosphere and hence annihilation of any life on earth has been brought within the range of technical possibility."
If you are a seeker of truth, search Truth Contest in Google and click the 1st result. Read The Present - it quotes Einstein quite often. If you can explain the truth better, submit an entry.
you don't understand!!!! Everything that was invented by Einstein,WASN'T REALLY INVENTED BY HIM....Were invented by Karatheodoris a GREEK scientist!!!!!!!!!!Einstein stole Karatheodoris' ideas,theories and inventions!!!So you owe those ideas,theories,inventions of mathematic formulas to Karatheodoris!!!This is what we learn in school here in Greece,because we Greeks are not occupied by the zionist darknes that tries to promote Einstein,giving him the inventions of Karatheodoris!!!!
@Liktori Of course. He was a ''trader''. Isn't that the profession of his people. They ''trade''. You know...Federal Reserve, Stock exchange, money changers who were thrown out of the temple....etc..
Which of them ever actually worked? You know...work.
THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE ATOMIC BOMB BY EUSTACE C. MULLINS.
Tells the story of Einstein who was bent on perpetuating inventions that would lead to mass murder.
Mullins got the info. while working at the US Library of Congress
Mullins worked for the US Library of Congress One thing Eustace writes is '' The man who set all this in motion was Albert Einstein, who left Europe and came to the United States in October 1933. His wife said that he "regarded human beings with detestation".
THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE ATOMIC BOMB BY EUSTACE C. MULLINS.
Tells the story of Einstein who was bent on perpetuating inventions that would lead to mass murder.
Mullins got the info. while working at the US Library of Congress
Mullins worked for the US Library of Congress One thing Eustace writes is '' The man who set all this in motion was Albert Einstein, who left Europe and came to the United States in October 1933. His wife said that he "regarded human beings with detestation".
@Arbiter11723 I posted about a book. Can you understand that? You are on a site which is discussing Einstein and you are ranting against a poster who recommended a book? Do you read? Have you any interest in Albert Einstein?
Eustace Mullins wrote some interesting books. He also worked for the Library of Congress which means he had resources available which the average person does not have.
You don't like books?
You don't like research?
Who are you and why are you responding to my posts?
Einstein was an ardent pacifist, especially before WWII. He is admitted to have renounced his pacifism with the rise of Hitler, but his urging that the US build nukes was only to counter the threat that Germany would do the same. In his later years, it is plainly clear that he detests pointless death and feels for all of mankind.
@cbasallie "HE IS ADMITTED TO HAVE RENOUNCED HIS PACIFISM WITH THE RISE OF HITLER". That's what I said. And eventually, he became pacifist again.
Also, if you knew that an evil superpower could be developing the ultimate weapon, one which you could only counter by building the same, how would you "pacifistically" deal with that situation?
@MrProgrampro Oh .... um ... so you say ''Einstein was a pacifist who temporarily gave up his beliefs just long enough to help promote a bomb which would wipe out hundreds of thousands of civilians but then...after they died...he was a pacifist again??
@cbasallie You didn't answer my pertinent question.
And yes, that summarizes it well. That's a long period of time, and with the horrors going on in Germany it's easy to imagine someone wanting to take action. I'm just saying my pacifist remark wasn't incorrect.
So again, if you knew Germany had begun development of the ultimate weapon, and that if you didn't have one as well then society would most likely fall under total tyrannical rule by a bunch of murderers, how would YOU deal with that?
@MrProgrampro I actually am a pacifist. I believe in God. I would pray. I believe God parted the Red Sea and I believe the pen is mightier than the sword and I believe the angels of God outnumber the angels of the Evil One by two to one.
So I would pray.
But ''pacifists'' like ZIONIST EINSTEIN would call me stupid for that.
So apparently....according to the ZIONIST, a ''smart'' pacifist nukes people while the ''stupid'' ones pray.
@cbasallie You know, people really were praying at the time. A LOT of people. In fact, people are always praying to solve the world's problems, and yet they remain...
I think you should realize that God does not work that way. God carries out His will through conscience-minded people who fight for His cause. Einstein DID something; inaction led to a 90% chance of certain doom, whereas action led to a 100% chance of survival.
Instead of hiding and praying, he went out and acted.
@MrProgrampro You're saying that god told Einstein to build a bomb? Well I guess one day we'll find out won't we? We all meet our Maker. It would certainly surprise me to find out that it was his plan. We'll see.
@cbasallie Maybe he told Einstein to do that, maybe he didn't; all i'm saying is that God works through the actions of humans, and prayer without action is empty.
@MrProgrampro Do you think all of the actions and every act commited by every person is God honoring? I don't . I think some actions are deplorable. I don't think murder is the will of God. Do you?
@cbasallie When did I say that ALL actions of people are God's will? All I said was that God performs his works through the actions of men.
Also, I'm a moral absolutist. I DO think certain acts are incontrovertibly deplorable, such as rape and murder. In fact, that's why I can't believe in the Old Testament.
@MrProgrampro You believe there was a justification for the bomb. You think that while murder is wrong that the bomb was justified and so it doesn't qualify as murder. Many people make that same argument. We rarely hear a dissenting opinion.
Eustace Mullins offers a different view point. I think it is one which is worthy of consideration.
@cbasallie Could you please enlighten me with what Eustace Mullins said? Also, all I said was that Einstein can not be damned simply because he created it; in fact, creating it was the best choice at the time to prevent evil.
The blood of those killed in the bomb droppings is on the hands of the japanese warlords who made it necessary in order to save lives; not on Einstein's.
@MrProgrampro I am recommending a BOOK. Eustace Mullins wrote a BOOK. I already used the 500 characters in my first post to offer some insight into what the WHOLE book is about.. That's all I can do. You don't have to like my recommendation.
I understand your viewpoint. You think the warlords started the war and so any reaction to them is justified. OK. We Americans have always learned and regurgitated that viewpoint.
@cbasallie Thankyou, that ad hominem was delicious ^_^
To the point, here is what I believe: At the time the bombs were dropped, many people HAD to die; either we would drop the bomb and kill i think 270,000 people, or we wouldn't drop it and closer to 500,000 people would die in battle. Given the situation, the call was made that lost less lives.
I blame the warlords for creating the situation in the first place. It's because of them that many needed to die.
Please don't assume that I am closed-minded. I have very-much thought this through, I'm not a hyper-patriotic stubbornhead and I'm not a war-mongering loon; I value all human life equally, and I believe that the bomb saved lives.
If the japanese warlords hadn't been evilly encroaching on others' rights, we wouldn't have needed to go in there and stop it, and hundreds of thousands of lives would have been saved. The blood is on their hands.
@MrProgrampro Well you know that is the justification that we use. It would be a good thing if you were right. I would like to have confidence in my nation and in our leaders and I would like to believe that all the wars we partake in are for the good of humanity but......more and more I'm beginning to find evidence to the contrary.ou
I do recommend checking out his book. If nothing else then ....maybe it will explain why so many Americans are losing faith in the decisions of our leaders.
@cbasallie I probably won't be able to go out and buy that book any time soon, but I see definitely see where you're coming from. At the very least, I think that our leaders act in the way that they think is best for humanity; whether they are correct is, I agree, debatable ;)
@MrProgrampro Well OK then. I'll give them that. I won't judge the motives of our leaders. Maybe some have been well intentioned. But whether they are correct is most definitely debatable.
He said like this : Hydrogen bomb up here of the public horizont as a bold ( another 2 words ) corrosive. Its accelerated development ( another 2 or 3 word ) problem by the president , If the crystal , radioactive opening to the atmosphere , and you analize of any lake on earth ( another word , i understand etimbold ) whitin the range of technical posibilities . Thats what he says ... im sure thats the wods .
Spaghetmonster = Extra dimensions + expanding space + curving space + drawing force + dark matter + dark energy. Do you believe, there is spaghetmonster? i dont believe.
I know, there is only one and same energy and space who is nothing. Some areas energy are more density what outside that areas. This areas where energy are more density, is absorbs energy all a time and thats why it is expanding. All quarks and particle like photons, expanding all a time in space who is nothing! LOVE
Free energy technology exists!But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Find this technology at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
Einstein was not a real scientist. He supposedly believed that the Earth is rotating on its axis and orbiting the sun even though the Michelson-Morley experiments had already proved that the Earth is not moving at all.
And people call me wierd for thinking like this... but I must declare that I have not done something that is equal, or more of this, but perhaps I can persue the interest of the more dynamic ideas. But first, I must get some sleep, I have to let my body rebalance and let my brain re-coagulate after a long day of study!
@TheJomogogo he discover his famous formula e=mc^2, which is the amount of energy released from a reaction. c^2 is equal to about 3X10^16, thats allot of energy.
so while no he didnt think up a bomb, he did open the door for them.
Einstein was indeed one of the greatest minds of all time. However, one comment below states that he " invented the ATOMIC BOMB's formula!! ". That`s incorrect! The atom/atomic bomb was an engineering feat more than anything else, and its `formula` was nuclear fission.
U.S. Congressman, abolitionist, "Father of the 14th Amendment" John Bingham, confirms understanding &construction framers used re birthright & jurisdiction House of Reps 3/9 1866:
I find no fault with the introductory clause which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States OF PARENTS NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN SOVEREIGNTY is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen
I understand that Einstein strongly regretted the use of his findings in predicting the integrity of the A-bomb. There was some concern before it was tested that it would cause a chain reaction that would turn the Earth into a mini sun.
He later said "With what weapons the third world war will be fought, I cannot know - but the fourth one will be fought with sticks and stones" (not a direct quote, but it is more-or-less accurate)
@tombokkers1997 He did not invent it at all. In fact far from it! Albert Einstein merely contacted the British and US prime minister / president and informed them of the potential.
@RobertsDigital The formula had already been developed. Its just that a few small details had to be added. Albert's involvement with the Atomic bomb production was rather small actually.
@Jubanuba you're wrong he didn't invented formule...he just discover E=M.C2 has application in many forms...openheimmer and company invents atomic bombs...newton discover gravity...don't blame him for the planes fall... :-D
@jabajabamaster becuase Einstein was a politic fraud,Herbert Dingle in 1972 refutes the theory of relativity that Einstein had copied in 1915, among others. In 1995 the GPS work without regard to Einstein's theory
Einstein is the 2nd greatest German behind Beethoven
I rank him 1st if i (and 99% of the worlds population) had a frickin clue what his theories meant.
"Einstein came up with E=mc2... hes super smart". Right, and what exactly does that mean dogbreath??? (besides giving the learned of by heart answer Energy equals mass times velocity of light squared) "Oh I have no idea... but boy does it sound good"
lol Sagan? Are you kidding me? He was great in the media, that's about it, he made no significant contribution to science. He has no significant publications. He was popular just because of Cosmos.
Feynman trumps Sagan for 'greatest mind'. I'm sure someone could trump Feynman but I can't think of anyone.
No, I kid you not. Contributions? If we talk about contributions, Sagan was the one who brought science to the non-scientist. Cosmos is a great example of this, but is not his only work. He has proven his wieght not only as a scientis, but as a speaker also.
If we are talking about sheer brain power and scientific contribution, who do you have that covers Ed Witten?
I'd put Witten up there with Feynman as well, I don't know enough about fine detailed specifics but I do know that he's a brilliant mind in theoretical physics. You can't deny Feynman's place there either.
I go back to my point. Sagan is only 'great' because of what he has done in the media, and you said it perfectly, he brought science to the non-scientists. Which is great. But in the scientific world that's not a great contribution.
What about it? Until SETI finds some concrete evidence of something out there I just think it's wasted research time. He had a great vision, but nothing has come from it.
I know it's amazing how the general public thinks Einstein "invented" the A-Bomb when he had nothing to do with it, didn't even think of a fission weapon until Leo Szilard told him about the concept. E=MC2 wasn't some magic formula for building the bomb. People piss me off.
espero que tu polulenta existencia no perjudique a nadie, sos un paracito aumentando la inercia del avance humano....
en palabras menos ortodoxas me guego las bolas a que sos una larba sin novia haha tenes amigos?no deverias.solo por ignorante....PS: buen ingles el tuyo!
He was a dick in his personal life. Not a real smart guy, just another piece of shit who cheated on his poor wife and treated her horribly. A great mind does not always translate into a great human being
He did not cheat on his wife. When Einstein won the Noble prize in Physics, he automatically transfered all the money won to his wife's account. If we didn't have him we would not be advanced to this stage in life. He was smart- not another piece of shit.
yes he did cheat on his wife. With a cousin of his and he gave his wife the right to the money he would get from a Noble Peace prize, if he won it. She must have had faith in him because she agreed to it. And he did finally win it.
@aljacu Sorry, he did cheat on his wife. This fact has been proven in his letters, now published in the book "Einstein, His Life and Universe" by Walter Isaacson. The money transfer was based on a contract he had with his wife, as a way of assuaging her feelings that he owed this to her due to what she felt she gave up in order for Einstein to pursue his own career. He agreed.
I know you wrote this over a year ago. But something really bothers me enough that I must point it out. Simply, that you are wrong. You do NOT have to be born with it. In fact, I think those who are born with it are at a disadvantage. All of us who see the universe through a scientific lens are a separate from those who don't; however, those of us who were once among the laymen have a basis to compare and know the vast important difference that you will always be ignorant of.
@psychosavant Assuming that people can 'once have been laymen' and then all of a sudden develop an insatiable curiosity for X, Y and Z....tell me again, how that is not being BORN with it. If a get's voice lowers when he's 12 as opposed to when he's 15, could you please, for my mind, define the significance of the petty semantics involved?
-
If you invent a filament, via 50 000 'theory, test and fail, modify, repeat', you have an insatiable curiosity that you were born with.
@psychosavant And it's likely being pursued to appease that bias. Ego. That's not a scientific lens. That's using science inefficiently as a scapegoat whipping boy. The bias is to railroad the "science".
-
It's fine. Just take care. Thanks for your comment. I'll think about the spots where I'll always be ignorant. That's nothing new.
I think you misunderstood me. I wasn't born with an innate desire to learn, but I did develop it. I'm not trying to railroad anything. I persue understanding to an obsessive level. If you were a person of science, you'd might learn that the human mind has the capacity for development and change.
-
If you asked me about the apple that fell, I'd tell you that he'd never actually mentioned that he saw an apple fall, but only that he was inspired by apples that had already fallen.
I wonder if every pastor in the world, has had to fight off the urge to mutilate and snuff life.
As though it were a 50/50 proposition. Pastor or Serial Killer. Oh my, they're BOTH JUST SO TEMPTING.
-
SO!
-
Since you may not have established the lettering on the supporting feature, let me lay it out one more time. This time, SOUND OUT THE VOWELS, and DERIVE A POINT. Then, address the point. It should sound like this. "I concede the point, you're right, I 'developed' WITHIN A PARAMETER."
Pay attention now. --- If a kid's voice lowers when he's 12, as opposed to when he's 15, could you please, for my mind, define the significance of the *petty semantics* involved? --- You've "developed yourself" within a parameter. That's what's meant by "born with". --- Did you REALLY think that anyone of me or mine could *EVER* do ANYTHING aside from ***THINK***? --- You say you've "developed" yourself to wonder. - What makes you think that that could have panned out ANY different than it did?
I boast the things I know nothing of. They're the topic of my most interesting discussions and ideation.
-
I've ZERO issues w/ 'unknown' or 'ignorance' or 'not yet uncovered' or 'impossible to uncover."
-
But when YOU assert MY ignorance about topics that are my backyard to me; and incidentally, a complicated interwoven knot of interstate, highway and back-alley to you, that get's my damn goat .
U simply don't have the stripes.
U were talking when you should have been listening.
What I find most am Perfhazing is that Albert Einstein developed his greatest theories by sitting around thinking about them, alone in his home.Perhaps a little more alone time thinking rather than sitting our kids in front of a TV might be one answer to solving the worlds issues
People like Albert that are born with insatiable curiosity, and naturally, a drive to derive the most efficient means to extract the answers from environment, and finally the anomaly that keeps his brain thinking on several different paths, COMPLETELY unrelated paths at all times. Then, the mind will pick out the relevant absolutes and postulate theorem. The exposure of TV is actually not a bad idea.
Point is it doesnt matter. His mind stops nor his curiosity.
@btghgirl Yeah, sure, that may be true. BUT, we also have to have a life. It's not a very interesting life if we just sit in a corner thinking about different things.
@btghgirl He didn't develop his theories alone in his home, sitting and thinking. First, the theories had a historical route and path, from Maxwell's formulas about magnetism and electricity to Poincare's published papers on relativity and LOTS more. He received critical mathematical help from people, particularly Marcel Grossman. What he did achieve, and was his genius, was his ability to break through standard thinking about time and light/speed no matter the frame of reference, before proof.
This has been flagged as spam show
E=mc² ist falsch......... E= (mc)² wäre richtig man beachte die Klammer!!!!!
sweetpolania 3 months ago
...pardon??..
somesortanaughty 4 months ago 5
Einstein didn't even help make the nuclear bomb during ww1 but he made it possible for other scientist because of his threoy of relativity e=Mc2
dumass4848 6 months ago
@dumass4848 The atomic bomb was not made until WW2.
ThatDifferentDude 5 months ago
Comment removed
DrFruedienslip 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dumass4848 People often get the theory of relativity confused with his philosophical quest to defne reality through quantum mechanics which has two forms the physical and the metaphysical' The metaphysical relates to the principles of nature in perceptionn and how consciousness can be effected' which has everything to to do with Intrinsic Anthropology'
DrFruedienslip 5 months ago
Comment removed
LeconsdAnalyse 4 months ago
@dumass4848
Couple of things dumass4848:
1. E=MC2 is not "the theory of relativity". It is the mass-energy equivelance equation. Relativity is something entirely different.
2. E=MC2 pointed out that a small amount of matter contains an enormous amount of energy, but that's all. It wasn't some magic formula that showed how to construct a fission weapon. Einstein had absolutely nothing to do with developing the Atomic Bomb.
Blahblobify 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you better be scared, cause that means Albert E equals MC sqareeeed!!
idreable 6 months ago
@UserNamei5 Who are you and what is your reason for posting to me?
cbasallie 7 months ago
@UserNamei5 Who are you and why are you messaging me?
cbasallie 7 months ago
una cosa es la ciencia donde se adquieren conocimientos y se lo organiza y otra pero muy diferente es la tecnologia, quien seria "la practica de esos onocimientos" pero quien es el responsable entonces..?? pues yo lo digo : ninguno. el responsable por la bomba atomica no es quien la ideó, quien ayudoa en la idea de su fabricacion o a su existencia,el responsable de la bomba atomica fue: quien la fabrico realmente, fisicamente, la hizo en la práctica y el mandante de tal hecho porsupuesto.
Yohoophy 7 months ago
una cosa es la ciencia donde se adquieren conocimientos y se lo organiza y otra pero muy diferentees la tecnologia, quien seria "la practica de esos onocimientos" pero quien es el responsable entonces..?? pues yo ol digo : ninguno. el responsable por la bomba atomica no es quien la ideo, quien ayudoa la idea de su fabricacion o a su xistencia,el responsable de la bomba atomica fue: quien la fabrico realmente, fisicamente, la hizo en la práctica y el mandante de tal hecho porsupuesto.
Yohoophy 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice video! I am an artist on YouTube trying to promote my theory on the dynamics of light and time
This theory is based on just two simple postulates
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function represents the forward passage of time itself
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event
Einstein’s dream an objective quantum mechanics!
nickharvey7 7 months ago
Te aMo Einstein :D
pikin53 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The hydrogen bomb appeared on the public horizon as a [fallback to the?] attainable good..."
Quoted from funknotik a few comments down:
"...Its accelerated development has been [following....-ly] by the president. Its successful radioactive poisoning of the atmosphere and hence annihilation of any life on earth has been brought within the range of technical possibility."
Someone else help finish this :)
MrProgrampro 8 months ago
Oh, it's all right: Einstein is sorry. He's sorry he did give nuclear weapons to the dull-brained Americans! Well, that's all right, then, Einstein. Sit down. Have a scone. Make yourself at home. You klutz! You stupid, bird-brained, flat-headed--
FireEyedMaidOfWar 8 months ago
@FireEyedMaidOfWar Trollololololololol... and that's giving you the benefit of the doubt.
All Einstein did was expand our knowledge. He investigated nuclear physics, and others took his conclusions and used them to cause suffering. If you look at his philosophy, the last thing he ever would want was to cause more suffering in the world. He deeply regretted this, you can't say it's his fault. That's like holding the inventor of metal buildings accountable for concentration camps.
MrProgrampro 8 months ago
@MrProgrampro: Not his fault? So he could write this obscene letter to the American supreme cry-baby Roosevelt (and his fiend-like Queen Eleanor) which did inform the dull-brained American for the first time of the existence of nuclear weapons without being held responsible for the consequences?
FireEyedMaidOfWar 8 months ago
@FireEyedMaidOfWar Okay, sorry, I was wrong with what I said
However, Einstein did what he did because he knew of the great and highly-likely danger that the Germans were likewise advancing nuclear research, and the knew that Hitler would undoubtedly be willing to use a nuke. He was sorry, but his justification was valid. If we hadn't developed the bomb and germany had, it would've meant the global realization of the third reich
In hindsight, criticism is easy, but at the time stakes were high
MrProgrampro 8 months ago
@MrProgrampro: Hard to tell, as Hitler had very little love for the “Jewish” science physics and embraced rather the German science of chemistry, so the only person working on nuclear weapons was Heisenberg in a small laboratory; and I do not think that a German global conquest would have been worse than the American hegemony! Remember: Every year 10 million people starve due to the American ideas about economy around the world every year!
FireEyedMaidOfWar 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FireEyedMaidOfWar Well, Einstein had reason to believe that Hitler was working on it. That's enough for me to consider him exempt.
Also "and I do not think that a German global conquest would have been worse than the American hegemony! Remember: Every year 10 million people starve due to the American ideas about economy around the world every year! "?? What? Can I at least have a source?
MrProgrampro 8 months ago
and that's why i am glad to be german.
thepeaceguitar 8 months ago
@thepeaceguitar - you'll understand more... when you get past your german being.
psychogulay 8 months ago
@psychogulay and you mean what by that?
thepeaceguitar 8 months ago
@thepeaceguitar - you'll see/ just wait...
psychogulay 6 months ago
There is not lies in my words..........The son of God is the Lord.Albert Einstein was ,-nothing but a man.And man is nothing compare to the one who we know as the eternal guiding light.Is truth ......The doings of the hand of man are great and many,but all of this are nothing without the intervention.permission and authority of that one whom knows all,the son.......In my words there is no lies.
TOLTECAAZTECA 9 months ago
@TOLTECAAZTECA Amen, man
Sasuke90000000 9 months ago
@TOLTECAAZTECA In your words there are a great number of grammatical errors.
TravisCG 8 months ago
@TravisCG May be because,i masturbate to much..............!
TOLTECAAZTECA 8 months ago
E-mc2 is dead...here's the new GIJ,J=0
SUNBLAKCARBON666 9 months ago
needs subtitles
valdas0 9 months ago
"It's accelerated development has been fallen leapfrog broccoli by the president. It's successful radioactive poisoning of the atmosphere and hence annihilation of any life on earth has been brought within the range of technical possibility."
funknotik 9 months ago
what?
gamervgd 10 months ago
If you are a seeker of truth, search Truth Contest in Google and click the 1st result. Read The Present - it quotes Einstein quite often. If you can explain the truth better, submit an entry.
vividDC 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you don't understand!!!! Everything that was invented by Einstein,WASN'T REALLY INVENTED BY HIM....Were invented by Karatheodoris a GREEK scientist!!!!!!!!!!Einstein stole Karatheodoris' ideas,theories and inventions!!!So you owe those ideas,theories,inventions of mathematic formulas to Karatheodoris!!!This is what we learn in school here in Greece,because we Greeks are not occupied by the zionist darknes that tries to promote Einstein,giving him the inventions of Karatheodoris!!!!
Liktori 11 months ago
@Liktori Of course. He was a ''trader''. Isn't that the profession of his people. They ''trade''. You know...Federal Reserve, Stock exchange, money changers who were thrown out of the temple....etc..
Which of them ever actually worked? You know...work.
They don't.
They steal and they ''trade''...
God help America.
cbasallie 10 months ago
hes probably talking about blowing president obama up with a atomic bomb, and get his body to the nearest lake on earth
sabbi6678 1 year ago
Comment removed
sabbi6678 1 year ago
THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE ATOMIC BOMB BY EUSTACE C. MULLINS.
Tells the story of Einstein who was bent on perpetuating inventions that would lead to mass murder.
Mullins got the info. while working at the US Library of Congress
Mullins worked for the US Library of Congress One thing Eustace writes is '' The man who set all this in motion was Albert Einstein, who left Europe and came to the United States in October 1933. His wife said that he "regarded human beings with detestation".
cbasallie 1 year ago 2
@cbasallie Fuck off troll
Arbiter11723 10 months ago
THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE ATOMIC BOMB BY EUSTACE C. MULLINS.
Tells the story of Einstein who was bent on perpetuating inventions that would lead to mass murder.
Mullins got the info. while working at the US Library of Congress
Mullins worked for the US Library of Congress One thing Eustace writes is '' The man who set all this in motion was Albert Einstein, who left Europe and came to the United States in October 1933. His wife said that he "regarded human beings with detestation".
cbasallie 10 months ago
@cbasallie Wow your a fail....
Arbiter11723 10 months ago
@Arbiter11723 I posted about a book. Can you understand that? You are on a site which is discussing Einstein and you are ranting against a poster who recommended a book? Do you read? Have you any interest in Albert Einstein?
Eustace Mullins wrote some interesting books. He also worked for the Library of Congress which means he had resources available which the average person does not have.
You don't like books?
You don't like research?
Who are you and why are you responding to my posts?
cbasallie 10 months ago
@cbasallie Hahahaha.... no.
Einstein was an ardent pacifist, especially before WWII. He is admitted to have renounced his pacifism with the rise of Hitler, but his urging that the US build nukes was only to counter the threat that Germany would do the same. In his later years, it is plainly clear that he detests pointless death and feels for all of mankind.
MrProgrampro 8 months ago
@MrProgrampro An ardent pacifist who urged that a nuclear bomb be built??. OH. Hmm...I suppose we define the word ''pacifist'' quite differently.
cbasallie 7 months ago
@cbasallie "HE IS ADMITTED TO HAVE RENOUNCED HIS PACIFISM WITH THE RISE OF HITLER". That's what I said. And eventually, he became pacifist again.
Also, if you knew that an evil superpower could be developing the ultimate weapon, one which you could only counter by building the same, how would you "pacifistically" deal with that situation?
MrProgrampro 7 months ago
@MrProgrampro Oh .... um ... so you say ''Einstein was a pacifist who temporarily gave up his beliefs just long enough to help promote a bomb which would wipe out hundreds of thousands of civilians but then...after they died...he was a pacifist again??
Sure.
Why not.
cbasallie 7 months ago
@cbasallie You didn't answer my pertinent question.
And yes, that summarizes it well. That's a long period of time, and with the horrors going on in Germany it's easy to imagine someone wanting to take action. I'm just saying my pacifist remark wasn't incorrect.
So again, if you knew Germany had begun development of the ultimate weapon, and that if you didn't have one as well then society would most likely fall under total tyrannical rule by a bunch of murderers, how would YOU deal with that?
MrProgrampro 7 months ago
@MrProgrampro I actually am a pacifist. I believe in God. I would pray. I believe God parted the Red Sea and I believe the pen is mightier than the sword and I believe the angels of God outnumber the angels of the Evil One by two to one.
So I would pray.
But ''pacifists'' like ZIONIST EINSTEIN would call me stupid for that.
So apparently....according to the ZIONIST, a ''smart'' pacifist nukes people while the ''stupid'' ones pray.
Isn't that how it works?
cbasallie 7 months ago
@cbasallie You know, people really were praying at the time. A LOT of people. In fact, people are always praying to solve the world's problems, and yet they remain...
I think you should realize that God does not work that way. God carries out His will through conscience-minded people who fight for His cause. Einstein DID something; inaction led to a 90% chance of certain doom, whereas action led to a 100% chance of survival.
Instead of hiding and praying, he went out and acted.
MrProgrampro 7 months ago
@MrProgrampro You're saying that god told Einstein to build a bomb? Well I guess one day we'll find out won't we? We all meet our Maker. It would certainly surprise me to find out that it was his plan. We'll see.
cbasallie 7 months ago
@cbasallie Maybe he told Einstein to do that, maybe he didn't; all i'm saying is that God works through the actions of humans, and prayer without action is empty.
MrProgrampro 7 months ago
@MrProgrampro Do you think all of the actions and every act commited by every person is God honoring? I don't . I think some actions are deplorable. I don't think murder is the will of God. Do you?
cbasallie 7 months ago
@cbasallie When did I say that ALL actions of people are God's will? All I said was that God performs his works through the actions of men.
Also, I'm a moral absolutist. I DO think certain acts are incontrovertibly deplorable, such as rape and murder. In fact, that's why I can't believe in the Old Testament.
MrProgrampro 7 months ago
@MrProgrampro You believe there was a justification for the bomb. You think that while murder is wrong that the bomb was justified and so it doesn't qualify as murder. Many people make that same argument. We rarely hear a dissenting opinion.
Eustace Mullins offers a different view point. I think it is one which is worthy of consideration.
cbasallie 7 months ago
@cbasallie Could you please enlighten me with what Eustace Mullins said? Also, all I said was that Einstein can not be damned simply because he created it; in fact, creating it was the best choice at the time to prevent evil.
The blood of those killed in the bomb droppings is on the hands of the japanese warlords who made it necessary in order to save lives; not on Einstein's.
MrProgrampro 7 months ago
@MrProgrampro I am recommending a BOOK. Eustace Mullins wrote a BOOK. I already used the 500 characters in my first post to offer some insight into what the WHOLE book is about.. That's all I can do. You don't have to like my recommendation.
I understand your viewpoint. You think the warlords started the war and so any reaction to them is justified. OK. We Americans have always learned and regurgitated that viewpoint.
Mullins offers a different perspective.
Open mindedness is a good thing.
cbasallie 7 months ago
@cbasallie Thankyou, that ad hominem was delicious ^_^
To the point, here is what I believe: At the time the bombs were dropped, many people HAD to die; either we would drop the bomb and kill i think 270,000 people, or we wouldn't drop it and closer to 500,000 people would die in battle. Given the situation, the call was made that lost less lives.
I blame the warlords for creating the situation in the first place. It's because of them that many needed to die.
[cont'd]
MrProgrampro 7 months ago 2
@cbasallie
[cont'd]
Please don't assume that I am closed-minded. I have very-much thought this through, I'm not a hyper-patriotic stubbornhead and I'm not a war-mongering loon; I value all human life equally, and I believe that the bomb saved lives.
If the japanese warlords hadn't been evilly encroaching on others' rights, we wouldn't have needed to go in there and stop it, and hundreds of thousands of lives would have been saved. The blood is on their hands.
MrProgrampro 7 months ago
@MrProgrampro Well you know that is the justification that we use. It would be a good thing if you were right. I would like to have confidence in my nation and in our leaders and I would like to believe that all the wars we partake in are for the good of humanity but......more and more I'm beginning to find evidence to the contrary.ou
I do recommend checking out his book. If nothing else then ....maybe it will explain why so many Americans are losing faith in the decisions of our leaders.
cbasallie 7 months ago
@cbasallie I probably won't be able to go out and buy that book any time soon, but I see definitely see where you're coming from. At the very least, I think that our leaders act in the way that they think is best for humanity; whether they are correct is, I agree, debatable ;)
MrProgrampro 7 months ago
@MrProgrampro Well OK then. I'll give them that. I won't judge the motives of our leaders. Maybe some have been well intentioned. But whether they are correct is most definitely debatable.
cbasallie 7 months ago
He said like this : Hydrogen bomb up here of the public horizont as a bold ( another 2 words ) corrosive. Its accelerated development ( another 2 or 3 word ) problem by the president , If the crystal , radioactive opening to the atmosphere , and you analize of any lake on earth ( another word , i understand etimbold ) whitin the range of technical posibilities . Thats what he says ... im sure thats the wods .
motanelustelistu 1 year ago
Spaghetmonster = Extra dimensions + expanding space + curving space + drawing force + dark matter + dark energy. Do you believe, there is spaghetmonster? i dont believe.
I know, there is only one and same energy and space who is nothing. Some areas energy are more density what outside that areas. This areas where energy are more density, is absorbs energy all a time and thats why it is expanding. All quarks and particle like photons, expanding all a time in space who is nothing! LOVE
Etimespace 1 year ago
Gauss
ignatei 1 year ago
Newton was smarter.
Gunner3210 1 year ago
@Gunner3210 yeah, the greatest
iakodu 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Gunner3210 lol thats new?
killzone474 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy technology exists!But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Find this technology at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
porscheghcje 1 year ago
omg i love this vid einstien is my hereo i love him so much and to here his voice is just great...I <3 einstien so much
alaskalover101 1 year ago
Whaaaaaaaaat??
GeorgesRushStPierre 1 year ago
i never thought Albert Einstein is only a black abyss
lordkelvin13 1 year ago
@lordkelvin13
WHETHER OR NOT YOU BELIEVE IN RELIGION
HOLY SHIT PEOPLE, TODAY SEPTEMBER 30 IS A LANDMARK IN HISTORY FOR ASTRONOMY
SCIENTISTS HAVE DISCOVERED THE FIRST EARTH-LIKE PLANET IN HISTORY
GO TO YOUTUBE USER : XKUNX
FOR THE BREAKING NEWS AND THE LOW DOWN THAT MIGHT EVENTUALLY CHANGE WORLD THINKING ON EARTH
XaosKunKillYourself 1 year ago
Einstein was not a real scientist. He supposedly believed that the Earth is rotating on its axis and orbiting the sun even though the Michelson-Morley experiments had already proved that the Earth is not moving at all.
dmh497 1 year ago
@dmh497 i dont know if thats true but even if it were true, of course he is a scientist, fucking retard!
supermanuman95 1 year ago
@supermanuman95 You sound hella smart!
dmh497 1 year ago
@dmh497 and you sound hella stupid!
supermanuman95 1 year ago
@dmh497 Doesn't the Earth rotate around its axis which results in night and day? And doesn't the Earth orbit around the Sun?
FutureOfVideos 1 year ago
@dmh497 I normally believe that everyone is smart but you sir are not even close to that normality.
floopsie666 1 year ago
albert einstein d mastermind off all.... wow....
krishdev97 1 year ago
And people call me wierd for thinking like this... but I must declare that I have not done something that is equal, or more of this, but perhaps I can persue the interest of the more dynamic ideas. But first, I must get some sleep, I have to let my body rebalance and let my brain re-coagulate after a long day of study!
RedSarcov 1 year ago
Mustve been sativa.
Master8laster 1 year ago
Einstein apparently had very very bad B.O....Guess he never figured out the shower .
zootella 1 year ago
R.I.P. HIROSHIMA and NAGASAKI JAPAN!!
mikijapajapa 1 year ago
@mikijapajapa
Einstien had nothing to do with inventing the Atomic Bomb, he didn't even think of it.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
@TheJomogogo he discover his famous formula e=mc^2, which is the amount of energy released from a reaction. c^2 is equal to about 3X10^16, thats allot of energy.
so while no he didnt think up a bomb, he did open the door for them.
TurtleCatJr 1 year ago
Einstein was indeed one of the greatest minds of all time. However, one comment below states that he " invented the ATOMIC BOMB's formula!! ". That`s incorrect! The atom/atomic bomb was an engineering feat more than anything else, and its `formula` was nuclear fission.
LeconsdAnalyse 1 year ago
What is the total amount of audio we have of Einstein talking? Can't find much on YouTubes.
Fersomling 1 year ago
U.S. Congressman, abolitionist, "Father of the 14th Amendment" John Bingham, confirms understanding &construction framers used re birthright & jurisdiction House of Reps 3/9 1866:
I find no fault with the introductory clause which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States OF PARENTS NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN SOVEREIGNTY is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen
kiiifute1 1 year ago
I understand that Einstein strongly regretted the use of his findings in predicting the integrity of the A-bomb. There was some concern before it was tested that it would cause a chain reaction that would turn the Earth into a mini sun.
He later said "With what weapons the third world war will be fought, I cannot know - but the fourth one will be fought with sticks and stones" (not a direct quote, but it is more-or-less accurate)
DownhillAllTheWay 1 year ago
O yeah a brilliant guy but he invented the ATOMIC BOMB's formula!!
tombokkers1997 1 year ago
@tombokkers1997 He did not invent it at all. In fact far from it! Albert Einstein merely contacted the British and US prime minister / president and informed them of the potential.
stoptheeukids 1 year ago
@He discovered how, but doest he who used the discover to do the bomb. The corrupted mind who did that was Hopenheimer. Please take a book.
Adrenogoredreams 1 year ago
When the Germans were invading Europe....Albert was developing the formula for the Atomic Bomb...hehehe
RobertsDigital 1 year ago
@RobertsDigital The formula had already been developed. Its just that a few small details had to be added. Albert's involvement with the Atomic bomb production was rather small actually.
stoptheeukids 1 year ago
yess.... he invented the formule for atomic bomb ya ermm nice man..
Jubanuba 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jubanuba you're wrong he didn't invented formule...he just discover E=M.C2 has application in many forms...openheimmer and company invents atomic bombs...newton discover gravity...don't blame him for the planes fall... :-D
breno0101 1 year ago
yes he did contribute to the atomic bomb's development and thank god he did before the axis forces worked it out.
flylne 1 year ago
amazing man
ashp5 1 year ago
yeaa i see einstein
12lukasss 1 year ago
bunicu meu iubit ...Dumnezeu sa nu-l ierte
mondiala07 1 year ago
Why isn't there more footage or interviews of one of the most influent persons in the history of science?
jabajabamaster 1 year ago
@jabajabamaster becuase Einstein was a politic fraud,Herbert Dingle in 1972 refutes the theory of relativity that Einstein had copied in 1915, among others. In 1995 the GPS work without regard to Einstein's theory
Zetlor 1 year ago
accelerated development......etc etc.
wardok2 1 year ago 2
I only understood two words he said. Something about "development" and "president."
Bob8199 2 years ago 34
can someone tell me, what did he say ? I am doing an essey about him and I need this video, please:)
MajunkaMajunka 2 years ago 3
Einstein is the 2nd greatest German behind Beethoven
I rank him 1st if i (and 99% of the worlds population) had a frickin clue what his theories meant.
"Einstein came up with E=mc2... hes super smart". Right, and what exactly does that mean dogbreath??? (besides giving the learned of by heart answer Energy equals mass times velocity of light squared) "Oh I have no idea... but boy does it sound good"
Ali74 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
xtremewrestling4life 2 years ago
What is Quantum?
TheEpicification 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Einstein drank dog urine everyday hence a high level of intelligence
smithlee07 2 years ago
Sagan and Einstein. The two greatest minds of the 20th century.
IcedPhoenix666 2 years ago
lol Sagan? Are you kidding me? He was great in the media, that's about it, he made no significant contribution to science. He has no significant publications. He was popular just because of Cosmos.
Feynman trumps Sagan for 'greatest mind'. I'm sure someone could trump Feynman but I can't think of anyone.
TwistedNoob 2 years ago 2
No, I kid you not. Contributions? If we talk about contributions, Sagan was the one who brought science to the non-scientist. Cosmos is a great example of this, but is not his only work. He has proven his wieght not only as a scientis, but as a speaker also.
If we are talking about sheer brain power and scientific contribution, who do you have that covers Ed Witten?
IcedPhoenix666 2 years ago
I'd put Witten up there with Feynman as well, I don't know enough about fine detailed specifics but I do know that he's a brilliant mind in theoretical physics. You can't deny Feynman's place there either.
I go back to my point. Sagan is only 'great' because of what he has done in the media, and you said it perfectly, he brought science to the non-scientists. Which is great. But in the scientific world that's not a great contribution.
TwistedNoob 2 years ago
What about his work with SETI?
IcedPhoenix666 2 years ago 7
What about it? Until SETI finds some concrete evidence of something out there I just think it's wasted research time. He had a great vision, but nothing has come from it.
TwistedNoob 2 years ago
I will let you off if you agree with me that he is an excellent writer =P
IcedPhoenix666 2 years ago
Deal :P
TwistedNoob 2 years ago
@TwistedNoob yeah u are a twistednoob
dymco 1 year ago
Steven hawking
0xygenIsOverRated 1 year ago
@0xygenIsOverRated einstein would be steven hawking's teacher
albertodreamboy 1 year ago
Ed Witten is abnormal. The way the guy talks and the tone of his voice is just weird.
Pastafarealist 1 year ago
@TwistedNoob Lol, you have abso-fecking-lutely no idea what you are talking about. :)
lollerdin 1 year ago
To geriga87:
The atomic bomb no has result of Einstein work. You' re so bastard!
valdir28011987 2 years ago 7
@valdir28011987
I know it's amazing how the general public thinks Einstein "invented" the A-Bomb when he had nothing to do with it, didn't even think of a fission weapon until Leo Szilard told him about the concept. E=MC2 wasn't some magic formula for building the bomb. People piss me off.
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
@valdir28011987 The atomic bomb has result of Einstein work.
FireStormBaller 10 months ago
@valdir28011987 he discovered how to split an atom, no?
DieWalrossen 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AY HITTLER POR QUE NOS HAS ABANDONADO ?
tijuana08 2 years ago
me juego la vida ke tambien sos un judio y ke nadie kiere
geringa87 2 years ago
gracias por la bomba atomica judio puto hijo de puta ...thanks for fucking Jew pump
geringa87 2 years ago
Tu ignorancia repugna en muchos niveles
espero que tu polulenta existencia no perjudique a nadie, sos un paracito aumentando la inercia del avance humano....
en palabras menos ortodoxas me guego las bolas a que sos una larba sin novia haha tenes amigos?no deverias.solo por ignorante....PS: buen ingles el tuyo!
BlueXav 2 years ago
I would like to sit in on just one of his lectures he taught prior to receiving the clause in his contract that allowed him to only do research.
Just one.
harpsichord1 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
I wish he would fuck my ass with his withered cock.
cartrifride 2 years ago
he must have channelled his higher self.
Akaliko 2 years ago
i wish i had atleast half his brain :/
phoenixaltar 2 years ago 6
id be happy with just half of half of it....or should i say..... 1/2 of 1/2= 1/4
06Chevy88 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this guy was a bullshitter!
quit believing in him!
MrDouglasfairbanks 2 years ago
NAysayers shutthe fuck up fucking RIDICULOUS amount of Ego in here
sayradashden 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He was a dick in his personal life. Not a real smart guy, just another piece of shit who cheated on his poor wife and treated her horribly. A great mind does not always translate into a great human being
btghgirl 2 years ago
He did not cheat on his wife. When Einstein won the Noble prize in Physics, he automatically transfered all the money won to his wife's account. If we didn't have him we would not be advanced to this stage in life. He was smart- not another piece of shit.
aljacu 2 years ago 10
yes he did cheat on his wife. With a cousin of his and he gave his wife the right to the money he would get from a Noble Peace prize, if he won it. She must have had faith in him because she agreed to it. And he did finally win it.
btghgirl 2 years ago
@aljacu Sorry, he did cheat on his wife. This fact has been proven in his letters, now published in the book "Einstein, His Life and Universe" by Walter Isaacson. The money transfer was based on a contract he had with his wife, as a way of assuaging her feelings that he owed this to her due to what she felt she gave up in order for Einstein to pursue his own career. He agreed.
lazurm 1 year ago
a great mind but not a real smart guy how does that make sense
iamamannow 2 years ago
I understand full well what insatiable curiosity can create.
That's what it takes. You have to be born with it.
It's a natural personal attribute. Newton had it, Edison etc.
What do you care about in life? If all you want is a complete picture, you will have inventions and discoveries too.
If all you want is pussy weed and beer, then leave the thinking to the natural born professional.
If I started asking you about the apple that fell, you'd pick it up , take a chomp and tell me shut up.
D33veeoss 2 years ago 16
i don't know what i said
iamamannow 2 years ago
very deep. You're a true scholar.
Donnybrook10 2 years ago
@D33veeoss
I know you wrote this over a year ago. But something really bothers me enough that I must point it out. Simply, that you are wrong. You do NOT have to be born with it. In fact, I think those who are born with it are at a disadvantage. All of us who see the universe through a scientific lens are a separate from those who don't; however, those of us who were once among the laymen have a basis to compare and know the vast important difference that you will always be ignorant of.
psychosavant 10 months ago
@psychosavant Assuming that people can 'once have been laymen' and then all of a sudden develop an insatiable curiosity for X, Y and Z....tell me again, how that is not being BORN with it. If a get's voice lowers when he's 12 as opposed to when he's 15, could you please, for my mind, define the significance of the petty semantics involved?
-
If you invent a filament, via 50 000 'theory, test and fail, modify, repeat', you have an insatiable curiosity that you were born with.
D33veeoss 10 months ago
@psychosavant That sample does not fall outside the scope of my prosecution. Not even NEAR to outside the realm.
-
I could continue about "born withs are at a disadvantage" but none of this is a discussion so...
-
BTW, check your vanity. Your narcissism seeps through your pores...and it stinks to the ones 'like' you.
-
Also, X YZ is my scope of light.
-
It's VERY likely, that if anything was "scientific lens" was "acquired" later in life, it's actually a bias ie, x OR y OR z.
D33veeoss 10 months ago
@psychosavant And it's likely being pursued to appease that bias. Ego. That's not a scientific lens. That's using science inefficiently as a scapegoat whipping boy. The bias is to railroad the "science".
-
It's fine. Just take care. Thanks for your comment. I'll think about the spots where I'll always be ignorant. That's nothing new.
-
Would you like an apple?
D33veeoss 10 months ago
@D33veeoss
I think you misunderstood me. I wasn't born with an innate desire to learn, but I did develop it. I'm not trying to railroad anything. I persue understanding to an obsessive level. If you were a person of science, you'd might learn that the human mind has the capacity for development and change.
-
If you asked me about the apple that fell, I'd tell you that he'd never actually mentioned that he saw an apple fall, but only that he was inspired by apples that had already fallen.
psychosavant 10 months ago
If I understood you better than you understood yourself...what would that seem like to you?
-
How would that present to you?
Could it illicit a comment something like, "I think you misunderstood me"?
-
You say that you've "developed". I'm curious, what was askew in Bundy's head, and if it could have been tested for in his formative years.
-
I also wonder if Bundy's "DEVELOPMENT" was a consequence/reaction/reflex/pre-programmed....OR....if he had a choice between a) pastor, b) creep?
D33veeoss 10 months ago
I wonder if every pastor in the world, has had to fight off the urge to mutilate and snuff life.
As though it were a 50/50 proposition. Pastor or Serial Killer. Oh my, they're BOTH JUST SO TEMPTING.
-
SO!
-
Since you may not have established the lettering on the supporting feature, let me lay it out one more time. This time, SOUND OUT THE VOWELS, and DERIVE A POINT. Then, address the point. It should sound like this. "I concede the point, you're right, I 'developed' WITHIN A PARAMETER."
D33veeoss 10 months ago
D33veeoss 10 months ago
Look here man...a plausible answer to that is simply, "if I was born someone else."
-
But you, in your skin, buddy, with your mind, ABOVE ALL, should know that I didn't use the word "insatiable" LIGHTLY or with fickle abandon.
-
Incessant, insatiable pondering of a myriad of topic matter.
-
As for psychology. Again, that's not outside of my scope kid.
I once got fucked for theorizing that if I called a certain girl "fat and ugly" that she'd fuck me to MAKE me "take it back". And she was smokin.
D33veeoss 10 months ago
Bottom line.
-
I boast the things I know nothing of. They're the topic of my most interesting discussions and ideation.
-
I've ZERO issues w/ 'unknown' or 'ignorance' or 'not yet uncovered' or 'impossible to uncover."
-
But when YOU assert MY ignorance about topics that are my backyard to me; and incidentally, a complicated interwoven knot of interstate, highway and back-alley to you, that get's my damn goat .
U simply don't have the stripes.
U were talking when you should have been listening.
D33veeoss 10 months ago
Now you'll pardon me while I down a Zopiclone and view my thoughts through a different filter.
D33veeoss 10 months ago
What I find most am Perfhazing is that Albert Einstein developed his greatest theories by sitting around thinking about them, alone in his home.Perhaps a little more alone time thinking rather than sitting our kids in front of a TV might be one answer to solving the worlds issues
btghgirl 2 years ago 82
Too hard. I need my Pokemon!
sh4rpsh0t33 2 years ago
It doesnt matter where or when
People like Albert that are born with insatiable curiosity, and naturally, a drive to derive the most efficient means to extract the answers from environment, and finally the anomaly that keeps his brain thinking on several different paths, COMPLETELY unrelated paths at all times. Then, the mind will pick out the relevant absolutes and postulate theorem. The exposure of TV is actually not a bad idea.
Point is it doesnt matter. His mind stops nor his curiosity.
D33veeoss 2 years ago 3
The practical application of a man born with these tools are spectacular.
Mushroom Cloud.
E=MC^2.( A critical filter to allow theorem that otherwise would have stayed speculative.)
Space/Time Incredible advances and a generous framework to help us find time's true nature in full.
D33veeoss 2 years ago
Maestro de Maestros
98monroy 1 year ago
@btghgirl Yeah, sure, that may be true. BUT, we also have to have a life. It's not a very interesting life if we just sit in a corner thinking about different things.
GillimKid 1 year ago
Comment removed
pandanara 1 year ago
@btghgirl Your're sitting here watching youtube are you not?
whitemencanjump1 1 year ago
@btghgirl indeed the world of physics is so amazing that it is much more interesting than any kind of movie or tv programme.
RTRVII 1 year ago
@btghgirl he was probably stoned too. cuz i know that makes me think a lot too.
midgets75 1 year ago
@btghgirl I agree more than I have done with anyone in a long time.
CHRISTMASBASTARD 1 year ago
@btghgirl I think the whole problem is in the education system. The knowledge is excellent but it is not presented in the proper way.
TheImmigrantsong 1 year ago
@btghgirl this is logical
I wish it is a crime to dominate kids for your T.v shows and it's products that robs mental enrgy and time and money.
919evilkiller919 1 year ago
@btghgirl He didn't develop his theories alone in his home, sitting and thinking. First, the theories had a historical route and path, from Maxwell's formulas about magnetism and electricity to Poincare's published papers on relativity and LOTS more. He received critical mathematical help from people, particularly Marcel Grossman. What he did achieve, and was his genius, was his ability to break through standard thinking about time and light/speed no matter the frame of reference, before proof.
lazurm 1 year ago
@lazurm Finally a good comment THANK YOU
JJHdisney 9 months ago