Hmm, I'm not too fond about those crescendi dynamics. It's too much of that. I like the Gould version more, because it's cleaner and more mathematically played.
I have never heard Bach played more beautifully Joshua. Never mind the critics. You play beautifully, and articulately. This performance stands with any of the masters.
I'm considering playing this for my sophomore state competition and i really like how you play it. I was questioning it's difficulty level and now that I hear it up to tempo it sounds much more appealing and impressive than what it seems when you're in the sight reading stage... haha
Awesome job of keeping the Bach vertical style but playing very expressively. I've heard this prelude a lot but I had to stop and listen to the whole thing-caught my ear the way you did it.
I love your interpretation of this piece and the Rachmaninoff. This competition looks very interesting! I was wondering if you have any more videos of the competition. Did you win by the way? What were other pieces you played? And you were dress to kill! You look and sound like a winner! Bravo!
Thanks! Yes, that arpez I don't think would be in ANY edition. It was my decision based on my knowledge of period performance practice. Awesome for you noticing that!
this is just excellent, jh. i was just listening to an old interview with Gould and he said he re-played his recordings with less bass to make them bright. that's what comes to mind here: bright and sparkling. gorgeous piano sound top rate recording too, of course.
Well, technically you can find more than 1 mistake in this performance if you listen closely... but consider this was my opening piece at my first major international competition and there ya go. Thanks for listening! Josh
AWESOME... Now this is what I call with expression=) hehe... I think this was a very good piece and the voices were singing and it wasn't as rigid as others which had been played but I think he slowed down at places... but i think it was really good looking over the slight notes that he played wrongly and THERE ARE DYNAMICS for once+)
this performance should have more of a comanding, stronger sound. not loud, stronger, and a steady tempo. bach doesn't change tempo, and there should be no pedal. there are exceptions of course, but in this suite there is no need for pedal. the opening theme expecially should be strong and sure, not timid.
I appreciate the comments! I have a natural strong sound, so usually I am trying not to sound so strong. In the opening section, my aim is to try and give the theme some shape, which is lacking in many recordings and performances. I think I succeeded with that. For the most part it it exactly on the beat, with occasional intentional deviations. I always strive to create an authentic performance, and having a standard that is "bach doesn't change tempos" is a bit one-dimensional.
@augustleroy I disagree there is no need for pedal in this suite. Keep in mind if you were to make a purely authentic performance you wouldn't be playing on a piano at all. Playing Bach on a piano is to play a transcription, and as such some concessions are admissible as long as performance practice permits. For instance, where would you draw the line as far as dynamics are concerned? Would you say, since it was composed for an instrument of limited dynamics, that such gradients are bad?
Agree if you say that his way in unique,but disagree if you state that his way is the only one=
On my pers.op.Gould's rendering of this piece is the best ever among several recordings I own - no one equals his performance but it's my point,not an abs.statement -
yeah, it sounded like the right hand was always superior, and this should be more of a chamber music piece in that they are equal and complimentary. I'd say that he should consider where the spotlight changes, and this could be really great!
Which "melodies"?? It is a PRELUDE, there's no contrapunctum. This performance is very good: clean, tasteful, and with a various dynamic. Comparing this guy with the stars is a quite different matter.
hmm.. some very good bits. There are two major distractions for me, however.
The first being that I feel like your right hand is obscuring some very important melodies in the left hand. The dynamic balance between the two is not to my taste. The second, is the lack of precision on what I feel is the strongest part of the piece- the section with the diminished/dominant climax and the run down Am back to the first theme. That cadence needs to be spot on.
it sounds a little bit as the Pogorelich version!!!it's really very well played but i prefer a completaly different approach... i know, probably, it's me that's wrong but, like that, i've the sensation listing 'romantic' music and bach one it's not...anyway thanks posting this video!!!
Hmm, I'm not too fond about those crescendi dynamics. It's too much of that. I like the Gould version more, because it's cleaner and more mathematically played.
GoldisMoney84 2 months ago
Splendid. (Your other rendition seems me a little less good.)
InnocentParadis 4 months ago in playlist Bach Keyboard
I have never heard Bach played more beautifully Joshua. Never mind the critics. You play beautifully, and articulately. This performance stands with any of the masters.
MarcusOhrealyis 6 months ago
@MarcusOhrealyis Thanks! :)
jhpianist 6 months ago
czerny
respekt200 1 year ago
great job especially for an opening piece in the competition as you said! :)
flutiste94 1 year ago
I'm considering playing this for my sophomore state competition and i really like how you play it. I was questioning it's difficulty level and now that I hear it up to tempo it sounds much more appealing and impressive than what it seems when you're in the sight reading stage... haha
lauraannetsch 1 year ago
I really admire your dynamic contrasts and color. Excellent Bach! Glenn who??
MarcusOhrealyis 1 year ago 2
fast song .. beautiful song
THEPIANO91 2 years ago
I see in you the next Gould.... BRAVO!
xbeq69 2 years ago 2
too quick?
kendoscot 2 years ago
Lovely! This is very tender, but clear and still lively. I never tire of this performance. Thank You!
pianofan2010 2 years ago
nice play...
danielbream 2 years ago
nice play.
nocturn9999 2 years ago
Awesome job of keeping the Bach vertical style but playing very expressively. I've heard this prelude a lot but I had to stop and listen to the whole thing-caught my ear the way you did it.
blievernic 3 years ago
very good,I like it a lot..!
stefanobevacqua 3 years ago
1: 14 mistake :S but nice!
natoush123 3 years ago
Hi Jhpianist,
I love your interpretation of this piece and the Rachmaninoff. This competition looks very interesting! I was wondering if you have any more videos of the competition. Did you win by the way? What were other pieces you played? And you were dress to kill! You look and sound like a winner! Bravo!
MissPianist 3 years ago 2
Probably 120?
sissichopin91 3 years ago
what speed did you play this prelude?
sissichopin91 3 years ago
gteat... I love the endind!!!!
Chopin1986 3 years ago
bravo. W bottoncino.
7milord7 3 years ago
Thanks! Yes, that arpez I don't think would be in ANY edition. It was my decision based on my knowledge of period performance practice. Awesome for you noticing that!
jhpianist 3 years ago
Listening to this again today, you play it so beautifully and with such nobility. The sound you create is what I am after. Good job man.
Rugdump 3 years ago
how long did it take for you to learn that piece?
blinkfbi 3 years ago
What on earth are you talking about??
jhpianist 3 years ago
this is just excellent, jh. i was just listening to an old interview with Gould and he said he re-played his recordings with less bass to make them bright. that's what comes to mind here: bright and sparkling. gorgeous piano sound top rate recording too, of course.
youcantbesirius 3 years ago
mistake at the bottm of pge 2 but rlly good!!
natoush777 4 years ago
Well, technically you can find more than 1 mistake in this performance if you listen closely... but consider this was my opening piece at my first major international competition and there ya go. Thanks for listening! Josh
jhpianist 3 years ago
AWESOME... Now this is what I call with expression=) hehe... I think this was a very good piece and the voices were singing and it wasn't as rigid as others which had been played but I think he slowed down at places... but i think it was really good looking over the slight notes that he played wrongly and THERE ARE DYNAMICS for once+)
AtobeKeichan 4 years ago 2
I love Bach and English Suites... I know very well this suite (as piano player) and all I can say is "very good execution"
PianistaMetallaro 4 years ago 3
this performance should have more of a comanding, stronger sound. not loud, stronger, and a steady tempo. bach doesn't change tempo, and there should be no pedal. there are exceptions of course, but in this suite there is no need for pedal. the opening theme expecially should be strong and sure, not timid.
augustleroy 4 years ago
my teacher said the same thing, but i still really REALLY like this performance
Rugdump 4 years ago
I appreciate the comments! I have a natural strong sound, so usually I am trying not to sound so strong. In the opening section, my aim is to try and give the theme some shape, which is lacking in many recordings and performances. I think I succeeded with that. For the most part it it exactly on the beat, with occasional intentional deviations. I always strive to create an authentic performance, and having a standard that is "bach doesn't change tempos" is a bit one-dimensional.
jhpianist 4 years ago
@augustleroy I disagree there is no need for pedal in this suite. Keep in mind if you were to make a purely authentic performance you wouldn't be playing on a piano at all. Playing Bach on a piano is to play a transcription, and as such some concessions are admissible as long as performance practice permits. For instance, where would you draw the line as far as dynamics are concerned? Would you say, since it was composed for an instrument of limited dynamics, that such gradients are bad?
jhpianist 4 months ago
Inspiring !!! You are WAY out of my league, but I can dream !!!!! Thanks for the shot in the arm...
dwightmorrow53 4 years ago
great! its a hard prelude. actually i am playing this too and i often do the same mistakes like you ;)
redmary1991 4 years ago
That is because you cannot even grasp the most basic principles of piano playing.
WENCHINGTON 4 years ago
(To JonathanLizcano):
NOONE sounds like Glenn Gould. Period.
dinosgreece 4 years ago
To dinosgreece-
Agree if you say that his way in unique,but disagree if you state that his way is the only one=
On my pers.op.Gould's rendering of this piece is the best ever among several recordings I own - no one equals his performance but it's my point,not an abs.statement -
indigoblue555 4 years ago
Too fast; most of the melodies are lost. Listen to Joao Carlos Martins on this piece for a much better permormance.
fabio99999999 4 years ago
yeah, it sounded like the right hand was always superior, and this should be more of a chamber music piece in that they are equal and complimentary. I'd say that he should consider where the spotlight changes, and this could be really great!
Liedliebhaber 4 years ago
too fast??? have u heard pogorelich?
Which "melodies"?? It is a PRELUDE, there's no contrapunctum. This performance is very good: clean, tasteful, and with a various dynamic. Comparing this guy with the stars is a quite different matter.
pianofolle 4 years ago
hmm.. some very good bits. There are two major distractions for me, however.
The first being that I feel like your right hand is obscuring some very important melodies in the left hand. The dynamic balance between the two is not to my taste. The second, is the lack of precision on what I feel is the strongest part of the piece- the section with the diminished/dominant climax and the run down Am back to the first theme. That cadence needs to be spot on.
lesmizzle 4 years ago
Beautiful.
Great piano too.
sethchau 4 years ago
it is terrible!!!!!
SPYKEjj 4 years ago
Amazing i give you a 100. this person rocked.
ColinMeloy91 4 years ago
i think it sounds like gould's actually, but that doesn't matter. I think it was great. Inspirational. My god, sounds exhausting.
JonathanLizcano 4 years ago
he is good but metronome is needed
mxedrioni 4 years ago
I should really get and listen to Pogorelich's recording... apparently it sounds a lot like how I play it. :)
jhpianist 4 years ago
sounds like you copied pogorelich's version.....
rallykarate 4 years ago
You know, when two people play the exact same song, they tend to sound like the same song.
WENCHINGTON 4 years ago
Well not trill. Whatever it was.
reedmorkant 4 years ago
I wasn't a fan of the little trill thing at the end...
reedmorkant 4 years ago
it sounds a little bit as the Pogorelich version!!!it's really very well played but i prefer a completaly different approach... i know, probably, it's me that's wrong but, like that, i've the sensation listing 'romantic' music and bach one it's not...anyway thanks posting this video!!!
godaisan79 4 years ago
super phrases!
OntZ 4 years ago