I have 6450 1GB, 4gb Ram, 2,5 TB HDD, Quad-Core 2.3GHz Overclocked Amd Phenom 9500, and i play the game at lowest graphics, with almost one fps. Rock on!
i wish they'll make a starcraft 2 update or seperate game (but still starcraft 2) that can be played by other people that has a very low graphics card, also i want that to be added in Heart Of The Swarm you know what else?? ADD LURKERS IN SC2 HOTS
oh and the settings from medium and ultra arent very noticeable, only when you zoom in it changes a bit, but lowest the change is plain noticeable, peace
Its Protoss lol not protos ;) nice vid though, finally someone does this, ive been trying to compare the settings, the highest i can play in is medium with no lag whatsoever, its on a 300 dollar laptop, the hp dv5, i freaking love it, im glad i bought it, i can play and do other things with no problem at all, so if anyone wants to be able to play sc2 on a affordable laptop on medium settings with no lag, look no further than the HP Dv5 its just awesome, trust me, works for me
When i started playing Beta & SC2 Finaly came out i had an awful PC and could only play on very low low settings.. now i got a new PC and can play on Ultra settings :D
Even though most people hate the default songs, I kind of like them. And thanks for the video because I really wanted to see it on the highest setting. Very nice.
it doesn't show much difference to me on youtube.. but the graphics with Ultra on pc is really awesome.. especially on Zerg hatcheries and extractors.. i guess the only reason we can't see much difference is bcuz it's uploaded on youtube..
what computer are you playing? My computer is Window 7 Home Premium. It run really fast (max speed setting) but when my shader is at Medium or higher setting; It become a little slow that run like mid speed setting (normal speed) in low shader setting. Therefore, I conclude the shader is what make a huge difference in the game. Terrain, effect, and other don't make much different to slow my computer down.
God, the low graphics make me want to play SC1 instead.
It's so much better to play a game that doesn't try to make amazing graphics than to play a game that tries to make it pretty yet has to be run on the lowest settings. 3D sucks on low :(
graphics means nothing, nintendo have proved this over 1000times, personaly i feel that when the game is set to low graphics i can see things a lot more clear
congrats. you just showed people what ive been playing at on lowest possible settings since sc2 came out.. thank god i will be getting a new computer shortly :D
I have an Intel I5 processor, 2.66ghz(can increase to 3.33ghz if needed), 6GB of ram, but sadly only an Intel(r) HD graphics card. Could i still run medium settings with my graphics card? Sadly i cannot replace my card as it is built in to my laptop.
@dannylee62 I know what you mean bro. I used to have an awful pc that could barely run counter-strike source :P So, i decided to get a job, earn some money, and after 5 months, I got enough to buy myself a PC :p
@dannylee62 Well yeah i feel ur pain but i have an XBOX360 and my bro's friend has an EPIC pc but no xbo360 so were even! :) hm.... but its still sad that we have to stand and watch. :(
@marfg12345 Thanks for the Tip, I know that it is way more cheaper to build your own Pc than to buy a per-made one, but the stuff that you got are very good!
Thanks again! :D
Hope people like got what you have written down lol
the program you recommended helped me so much on what i need i had to thank you cause the one thing that was holding me back in terms of running this was my card now i only get lag on like the ultra setting
So if my computer meets all the Recommended requirements except for Video card (video card meets minimum requirements), should it play ok on my computer with all low settings?
Does video card just affect the graphics? I mean to say, that since my RAM and processor are both very good, my game shouldn't slow down?
@blajablaja1 well actually, any graphic card in the market is good enough for medium plays. You only need a good graphic card if you want that fps to be higher than 30.
@blajablaja1 I recommend the GTS 450. It cost around 100$ on newegg and it can run SC2 on highest settings. If you want a bit more the GTX 460/560 is very good. For ATI/AMD I don't really know.
@awesome220 That was the same thing for me, and it ran sc in 13 fps max( on low). Check your systems more specifically without requierments lab or anything like that
@awesome220 Ive been playing starcraft II on a 9 year old computer, it lags a bit, but i can still play, Im willing to bet your computer will run it just fine.
Its good that they actualy made it playable for weaker pc's i have a laptop and its not old just i have a graphic card that well a graphic card that costs only 50$ would boost preformance 3x but sadly its not upgradable
@USERNAMEKLEMPTOR windows vista is acually recomended to run starcraft 2 and 2.0 ram is on the recommneded list as well but you need a cpu Dual Core 2.4 GHz Processor and 512 MB NVIDIA® GeForce® 8800 GTX or ATI Radeon® HD 3870 or better, and thats for recommneded setting so to not expreince any lag at all id suggest playing on high, blizzard is gonna suggest medium but the underscore you computer for the specs it can run
I hoping to get a comp, instead of using my laptop cause I have to run starcraft 2 on the lowest settings because of my crappy intel graphics card :( but the game is still great :)
This is one reason why this game is so amazing. You can play it from an old computer, and still have fun, or you can play it on a new computer with better graphics.
@deado000 My suggestion: Sell your mac, and buy a computer running windows xp/windows 7 so that after 2 years pass you don't have a non-upgradeable computer that can't play the newest games.
And yes, your computer could probably run it in between low and medium (Not sure if your processor could handle medium)
@deado000 I'm just gonna say that I've used garage band, and it's not much better than fl studio (I actually prefer it [and no, I don't use it extensively] and even mixcraft. It's definitely not worth the extra 75% you pay for the hardware
@lalamonkeydude Garageband is the biggest waste of space on a Macs hard drive possible, and is an offence to call it a music editing and creation tool :D . I'm talking about Logic Pro, as well as Pro Tools, Ableton Live and Reason, mainly Logic Pro though, which you can't get for Windows.
Macs are also the key part for film editing as well, basically for creative editing you NEED a Mac, it's just unwritten law.
I think its good that blizz made the game so that you can play SC2 even if you have a moderately good comp. Maybe you dont have the cash to buy a uber comp for 15-20.000 bucks (Thats in swedish kronor ^^) Because, grachips isnt everything. Just look at CS 1.6.
the last three stages in medium have so much stuff going on that it's hard to find out what's an actual unit and what's not.
I thought blizzard was not the kind of company who would just jump on the "the more graphic details, the better" bandwagon that 99,99% oft new gen console games jump on.
It sucks to be a Protoss player because it tends to lag more if you trying to play on better graphics than low. Reason is the pylon background and most people have high graphics posted on youtube.
will i be able to play on any settings lag free with a stock toshiba satellite L300? someone please respond i wanna know if i can play or if i have to return sc2
@Stratocaster720 It is. i have Ati radeon hd 4850 on imac 27 quad core i5 2540x1440 resolution and the graphics card is designed for laptops and it runs 50-70fps on high.
On the "can you run it" site I got about a third of the way between min requirements and recommended, does this mean I am stuck on the lowest graphics settings or can I run med at a pinch? :D
Sloooow comp
TheSavvyBox 1 month ago
Low quality looks like Warcraft 3
AstropilotStudios 1 month ago 5
IMO I didn't like the choice of music, but the video accomplished it's goal :)
Thanks for the comparison. Good video :)
Sarcahsm 1 month ago
@Sarcahsm Thanks. My original audio got removed due to copyrights, so I had to put it some copyright-free music.
It's not perfect, but it's better than no music :)
StarCraft2StarCraft2 1 month ago
@wc1hater sc1 had the graphics of 1991... They did try to make it as pretty as possible.
wertyuil1 1 month ago
you lagg
ErsteMahnung 2 months ago
@ErsteMahnung If you turn the notations on, you'll understand why...
StarCraft2StarCraft2 1 month ago
It looks like fucking lego on low settings
TheBizzle280 2 months ago
I have 6450 1GB, 4gb Ram, 2,5 TB HDD, Quad-Core 2.3GHz Overclocked Amd Phenom 9500, and i play the game at lowest graphics, with almost one fps. Rock on!
DJPetomatick 2 months ago
@DJPetomatick im dual core i3 4 gb ram 6850 with 110 fps XD
DarKn0ObXD 2 months ago
as it is called the music video of your video bune another thing I have the stacraft 2 low
zealot50 2 months ago
whats ur fps when u play on ultra settings?
amvGhost 3 months ago
@amvGhost Around 50-60
StarCraft2StarCraft2 2 months ago
looks cuter in low graphics <3
thats how i have to play cuz of my PC :(
Deidara1BG 3 months ago
lol lowest graphics can be used for maps which resemble team fortress' clay units
jcjs95 3 months ago
Did you use a 5850 or 5870?
NiceMicro 4 months ago
5830 actually.
StarCraft2StarCraft2 4 months ago
can i run this game on my fucking radeon 9250? there should be a button where can i desactivate the pixel shader 2.0
vioniribu 4 months ago
I always play on low vs extreme, its just easier to control units and see what's going on clearer without the fancy graphics getting in the way.
boyze123 4 months ago
@boyze123 not that, but your computer is shit that's the reason
OpenGLSecond 2 months ago
i wish they'll make a starcraft 2 update or seperate game (but still starcraft 2) that can be played by other people that has a very low graphics card, also i want that to be added in Heart Of The Swarm you know what else?? ADD LURKERS IN SC2 HOTS
Controlfreak9989 4 months ago
sc2 has nice graphics and physics, and shit game mechanics
DnizzlRus 4 months ago
low settings are still pretty nice
pluikl 5 months ago
On lowest graphics, the SC2 game looks cartoonish.
zinki120 5 months ago 15
@zinki120
on highest graphic, the SC2 game looks cartoonish.
lopeyschools 1 month ago
@zinki120 But its got epic framerate
Juanototo1 1 month ago
i don't have a monster PC, so i have to play on minimun settings :(
very good sequel anyway.
greciasoleble 5 months ago
oh and the settings from medium and ultra arent very noticeable, only when you zoom in it changes a bit, but lowest the change is plain noticeable, peace
mhfudavedavedave1 5 months ago
Its Protoss lol not protos ;) nice vid though, finally someone does this, ive been trying to compare the settings, the highest i can play in is medium with no lag whatsoever, its on a 300 dollar laptop, the hp dv5, i freaking love it, im glad i bought it, i can play and do other things with no problem at all, so if anyone wants to be able to play sc2 on a affordable laptop on medium settings with no lag, look no further than the HP Dv5 its just awesome, trust me, works for me
mhfudavedavedave1 5 months ago
strangely, the lowest graphics looks like Warcraft 3
heroestratos 5 months ago
what graphics settings do i need to put on to see death animations?
Prophet12349 5 months ago
When playing battle.net,online, do most likely people have to lower their graphics ?
Cutewhineyboy 5 months ago
you need a big pc for this game, i have this game and i use mid. graph :(
theskram1 5 months ago
What computer/laptop do you have?
georgeofnewyork 5 months ago
Lowest settings (except 3d portraits) and proud.
CowHoofOnAHotPlate 5 months ago
When i started playing Beta & SC2 Finaly came out i had an awful PC and could only play on very low low settings.. now i got a new PC and can play on Ultra settings :D
RaytorX 6 months ago
the zergs sucks with lowest settings
membrillomen 6 months ago
Lawl i have a 1.8 Ghz and for the minimum u need 2.4
But i still could play this game on lowest, and it doesn't looks that bad u know..
Tecisk 6 months ago
Even though most people hate the default songs, I kind of like them. And thanks for the video because I really wanted to see it on the highest setting. Very nice.
KJasian 6 months ago
Looks awesome! But why didn't you record it with 1080 res?
lindholmaren 6 months ago
lowest graphics looks like your average MMORPG graphics
sirroger11 6 months ago
my friend plays with medium settings and has 70 FPS, I play with lowest settings possible and play with 17 FPS... fuck...
shawnyyb0yy 6 months ago
i dont get any lag from using fraps, why do you get lag?
Globalcashcookie 6 months ago
How well will this game run on my laptop?
Asus
Intel core i5 2.3GHz
4GB Ram
Windows 7
Nvidia Geforce 540M. Cuda 1GB
The0Hitman47 6 months ago
@The0Hitman47 i think it might run...
is this laptop for gaming?
EnforcedSteam 6 months ago
low is not that bad
4j0n 7 months ago
the lowest is just warcraft 3
5zidane6 7 months ago
it doesn't show much difference to me on youtube.. but the graphics with Ultra on pc is really awesome.. especially on Zerg hatcheries and extractors.. i guess the only reason we can't see much difference is bcuz it's uploaded on youtube..
VVinst0n 7 months ago
Hey bro, how well do you think Nvidia Geforce gt 540m can run?
NaseebyWali 7 months ago
@NaseebyWali I've heard it runs well on Medium.
ZeGuyFly 7 months ago
@ZeGuyFly Thanks. Appreciate it.
NaseebyWali 7 months ago
@NaseebyWali It can run more than medium...........it is able to run it at ULTRA!!!!!!!!!
eduardomyugi 7 months ago
Can i max out with this:
AMD Phoenom x4 3.3ghz
Nvidia Geforce 9500 gt (Uber mega overclocked)
2gb Ram
Win 7 ultimate SP1
500gb HD
Trualdie 7 months ago
@Trualdie sure.............no prob
eduardomyugi 7 months ago
Most pro gamers play on the lowest setting. It easier to see everything and the response time is better.
TamaNewb 7 months ago
@TamaNewb thats true...................but if you can run it at 100 fps in ultra why play it at 1000 fps in low?
eduardomyugi 7 months ago
still looks nice :)
Bombsiak 7 months ago
what computer are you playing? My computer is Window 7 Home Premium. It run really fast (max speed setting) but when my shader is at Medium or higher setting; It become a little slow that run like mid speed setting (normal speed) in low shader setting. Therefore, I conclude the shader is what make a huge difference in the game. Terrain, effect, and other don't make much different to slow my computer down.
Takahashi1945 7 months ago
What graphics would fit my PC?
Intel Dual Core 2.00 Ghz
RAM 2.00 Ghz
NVidia GeForce 8400 GS 512 mb
Alexones1 8 months ago
@Alexones1 Mines the same so idk
234Darkvader 8 months ago
@234Darkvader i currently have all on ultra except shaders , lightning and shadows (which are on low) and it works with no lag
Alexones1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God, the low graphics make me want to play SC1 instead.
It's so much better to play a game that doesn't try to make amazing graphics than to play a game that tries to make it pretty yet has to be run on the lowest settings. 3D sucks on low :(
wc1hater 8 months ago
Comment removed
wc1hater 8 months ago
Hey the second part looks like mine! Sept with no lag...
ZSParkourMilwaukee 8 months ago
The major difference is between low and medium, but of course, Ultra rules :)
saibarcafi 8 months ago
graphics means nothing, nintendo have proved this over 1000times, personaly i feel that when the game is set to low graphics i can see things a lot more clear
TheMikeBase 8 months ago
congrats. you just showed people what ive been playing at on lowest possible settings since sc2 came out.. thank god i will be getting a new computer shortly :D
robinchwan 8 months ago
I have to set lowest graphics for multiplayer, but in campaign I can run some missions at full with no lag, and they look just beautiful
savagemessiah82 8 months ago
can a Radeon hd 6550m (dedicated) graphics card, i5 2.66 ghz processor (2.93 turbo boost),1600x900 resolution... play starcraft 2? (what settings?)
nathan4chan 8 months ago
lol. i play on lowest settings and i still only get 14FPS
DimensionGamingDG 8 months ago
Play ultra settings at 2fps like a boss!!
And break your video card...
lolatmyaccounts 8 months ago
Lowest graphics look like warcraft 3
YognautZach 8 months ago
a comic book looks more realistic then that kinda sad
TheJerseyboi101 8 months ago
I have an Intel I5 processor, 2.66ghz(can increase to 3.33ghz if needed), 6GB of ram, but sadly only an Intel(r) HD graphics card. Could i still run medium settings with my graphics card? Sadly i cannot replace my card as it is built in to my laptop.
adamz1111 9 months ago
Still looks pretty nice on lowest.
axemen233 9 months ago
some people are so lucky to have great PCs to run an awesome game, while we have to stand and watch
:[
dannylee62 9 months ago 48
@dannylee62 I know what you mean bro. I used to have an awful pc that could barely run counter-strike source :P So, i decided to get a job, earn some money, and after 5 months, I got enough to buy myself a PC :p
StarCraft2StarCraft2 9 months ago 35
@StarCraft2StarCraft2 Sorry for asking now, but did you get a real job or part-time...?
0kamiW0lf 3 months ago
@0kamiW0lf Its cool :)
I did it during my summer vacation, which is a total of 60 days.
I worked 30 of them, which I would consider a real job.
In total I earned about 3000$ which was way enough for a really good computer.
StarCraft2StarCraft2 3 months ago
@dannylee62 Well yeah i feel ur pain but i have an XBOX360 and my bro's friend has an EPIC pc but no xbo360 so were even! :) hm.... but its still sad that we have to stand and watch. :(
Kornifnotthendie 9 months ago
@dannylee62 well that is sad
even though I'm one of those people who have a great PC
darclordfilms1 6 months ago
@dannylee62 i know what you man its me,too.
Streetboy1167 6 months ago
@dannylee62 if you want a good 4 core cheap system, save up 500$, i payed my 500$ (motherboard, cpu, ram, psu, gpu)
amd phenom II x4 965 be 3,4GHz (i oc it to 4,0gHz)
4gb ddr3 ram
hd6870 1gb gddr5
corsair cx600 ps
asrock 770 extreme3 am3
all that cost me only 500$ not including the new monitor and case
it's not alot of money, and the pc is great
marfg12345 5 months ago
@marfg12345 Thanks for the Tip, I know that it is way more cheaper to build your own Pc than to buy a per-made one, but the stuff that you got are very good!
Thanks again! :D
Hope people like got what you have written down lol
dannylee62 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a:
core 2 duo with 2.66 ghz
2 gb chinese ram
nvidia gtx 560ti 1 gb memory
and I can run this game on ultra at 60 fps at 160x900, and even when on huge battles the frame rate wont drop below the 50's
sidney765 9 months ago
mine actually lags more on lower settings O_o
eatmyshorts2007 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So, if i have
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 3.3GHz, (3.7GHz Turbo) Six-Core Desktop Processor
HIS H577FK1GD Radeon HD 5770 1GB 128-bit Video card
and 8GB of ram
what settings do you think i could run it on? :D
ultramasterman 9 months ago
Comment removed
ultramasterman 9 months ago
the program you recommended helped me so much on what i need i had to thank you cause the one thing that was holding me back in terms of running this was my card now i only get lag on like the ultra setting
Darkfoxx999 9 months ago
Hey Dude Are The Low Settings Just Like Red Alert 3's CYRI NEVER works for me ? And I don't see the graphics card system requirements.
Empireearthmovies 10 months ago
So if my computer meets all the Recommended requirements except for Video card (video card meets minimum requirements), should it play ok on my computer with all low settings?
Does video card just affect the graphics? I mean to say, that since my RAM and processor are both very good, my game shouldn't slow down?
awesome220 10 months ago
@awesome220 The video card is very crucial when it comes to playing games.
But since it meets the minimum requirements, and you got a good RAM and processor, you should be able to play it on at least low. At least.
StarCraft2StarCraft2 10 months ago
@StarCraft2StarCraft2 I have a 4gb RAM and dual core 2.4 ghz. Mine lags at medium settings what causes it?
blajablaja1 9 months ago
@blajablaja1 graphic card.
hangene92 8 months ago
@hangene92 which one you recommend? I mean to play at least on medium (not ultra)
blajablaja1 8 months ago
@blajablaja1 well actually, any graphic card in the market is good enough for medium plays. You only need a good graphic card if you want that fps to be higher than 30.
hangene92 8 months ago
@blajablaja1 I recommend the GTS 450. It cost around 100$ on newegg and it can run SC2 on highest settings. If you want a bit more the GTX 460/560 is very good. For ATI/AMD I don't really know.
Darkteammadfiz 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Darkteammadfiz thanx, I'll check it on e-bay
blajablaja1 8 months ago
@StarCraft2StarCraft2 if my video card is nvidia geforce 320m and i have 5gb ram, is that enough to play on ultra
SidCalibur 7 months ago
@StarCraft2StarCraft2 tht explains y i have 0, 1,2 or 3 fps on low settings
roguerunner14 7 months ago
@StarCraft2StarCraft2 will i be able to run this in ultra with this
4 gb ram,quad core intel core i7,nvidia quadro fx 880m 1 gb???
JohnnyBoy7267 6 months ago
@awesome220 That was the same thing for me, and it ran sc in 13 fps max( on low). Check your systems more specifically without requierments lab or anything like that
siegetank55 7 months ago
@awesome220 Ive been playing starcraft II on a 9 year old computer, it lags a bit, but i can still play, Im willing to bet your computer will run it just fine.
Ultimabong 6 months ago
@Ultimabong Thanks for your input!
awesome220 6 months ago
Its good that they actualy made it playable for weaker pc's i have a laptop and its not old just i have a graphic card that well a graphic card that costs only 50$ would boost preformance 3x but sadly its not upgradable
WarHawk215 10 months ago
i can run on high but i run at lowest cause it batter more scruffy to play
theemperor122 10 months ago
can i run ultra setitings on this specs
PHENOM2 X4 925
4gig ram
hd4670
tomopyon1A3 10 months ago
can i run ultra on hd4670?
tomopyon1A3 10 months ago
i have windows vista and have like a 2.00 ram what would my best settings be?
USERNAMEKLEMPTOR 10 months ago
@USERNAMEKLEMPTOR windows vista is acually recomended to run starcraft 2 and 2.0 ram is on the recommneded list as well but you need a cpu Dual Core 2.4 GHz Processor and 512 MB NVIDIA® GeForce® 8800 GTX or ATI Radeon® HD 3870 or better, and thats for recommneded setting so to not expreince any lag at all id suggest playing on high, blizzard is gonna suggest medium but the underscore you computer for the specs it can run
Darkfoxx999 9 months ago
I hoping to get a comp, instead of using my laptop cause I have to run starcraft 2 on the lowest settings because of my crappy intel graphics card :( but the game is still great :)
titan36d 10 months ago
on Low it just look like the old starcraft but then upgraded
beanelisa 10 months ago
I wish my computer ran SCII this smooth. >.<
FrankTehTank96 10 months ago
God it's ugly on the lowest setting.
Happy that I bought this game with a ati hd 5770.
I had a ati hd 4200 integrated.
Ephics 10 months ago
This is one reason why this game is so amazing. You can play it from an old computer, and still have fun, or you can play it on a new computer with better graphics.
halogamer77 10 months ago
my comps specs: amd phenom x2 sixcore 3.0ghz, 8gb ram. gforce 460se. havent found a game that can lag more computer yet.
GermanSniperBayArea 10 months ago
if you look at it lowest graphics could be a kind of gamestyle too like a cartoonish kinda play i would still rather ultra but thats just me
Monthral1 10 months ago
lol my pc ram is only
768mb
yimkahe 11 months ago
graphics dont make the game. Gameplay does. :]
omegadude255 11 months ago
protoss are the less ugly ones in low graphics xD
SasoriFanXD 11 months ago
Would my Mac have to run on lowest settings, or could I maybe bump up to medium:
8600 GT 256MB
4GB 667 DDR2 RAM
C2D 2.4Ghz
late 07/ early 08 model.
WOuld want to know before I buy the game really. Cheers guys! :)
deado000 11 months ago
@deado000 you would be running on low
GermanSniperBayArea 10 months ago
@deado000 My suggestion: Sell your mac, and buy a computer running windows xp/windows 7 so that after 2 years pass you don't have a non-upgradeable computer that can't play the newest games.
And yes, your computer could probably run it in between low and medium (Not sure if your processor could handle medium)
lalamonkeydude 10 months ago
@lalamonkeydude I will when PC gets the best music editing software, until then I'll stick with Mac TYVM :)
Need Mac for university.
deado000 10 months ago
@deado000 I'm just gonna say that I've used garage band, and it's not much better than fl studio (I actually prefer it [and no, I don't use it extensively] and even mixcraft. It's definitely not worth the extra 75% you pay for the hardware
lalamonkeydude 10 months ago
@lalamonkeydude Garageband is the biggest waste of space on a Macs hard drive possible, and is an offence to call it a music editing and creation tool :D . I'm talking about Logic Pro, as well as Pro Tools, Ableton Live and Reason, mainly Logic Pro though, which you can't get for Windows.
Macs are also the key part for film editing as well, basically for creative editing you NEED a Mac, it's just unwritten law.
I agree about the price though.
deado000 10 months ago
Can a 7300 LE nvidia approx. memory 854mb. run it with dual core @ 2.13 GHz and 2 gb of ram?
sobambomberful 11 months ago
@sobambomberful you would need 0.07 more GHz of processing power
lalamonkeydude 10 months ago
so what if im watching the vid on 360 p?
BZhubb808 11 months ago
Can this video card run it? ATI Radeon x1650 Pro? can it run?
babysymbiote 11 months ago
Is it just me, or does the low settings look like claymation?
ScaryBeast 1 year ago
c&c 3 graphics is way better than starcraft 2
23bilog23 1 year ago
you didn't even scout. but who cares this is just a graphics comparison
yisoonshin12 1 year ago
who uses sensor towers?
yisoonshin12 1 year ago
How you do you get it to run smooth with high graphic settings?
Mynameis708 1 year ago
Lowest Texture looks like WC 3 to me(maybe I didn't change the settings lol)
StelarCF 1 year ago
well i looks like on lowest grapics it looks like sc 1 but in 3D O_o no not like popping out and that
guythatonlycomments 1 year ago
Im sure this has been noted but on low just looks like wc 3
AlexB4455 1 year ago
I think The protoss is doing very well with low graphics , it still looks cool
SkPuzzle 1 year ago
so basiclly if your able to play the old starcraft you should be able to play starcraft 2 on low settings right
12musicgroup 1 year ago
@12musicgroup yea
breadpops 1 year ago
this looks like minecraft graphics?
Whysoseriousdude1 1 year ago
Zerg are the most damaged with low settings.
anyway, its sad when in low setting when a structure is destroyed it doesnt left pieces behind.
Zandotroll2 1 year ago
to people complaining about the graphics in this game, yeah, if you zoom in on a single unit, it doesn't look supergood.
but you MUST also remember that you can't by any means compare rts games with OTHER games... not even mmos.
rts games are supposed to look good from a distance, otherwise it would lag like hell...
when you see the whole battlefield with all shooting beams, explosions, slimebursts and whatnot, THEN you can see how the graphics are superior.
think people, THINK...
bibbisbibbis 1 year ago
My Starcraft II gameplay fps was drop from 60-100 to 30 in some campaign and melee game large army, i don't know why
Spec
Intel i5 760
4GB ram gskill
Geforce GTX460
it's CPU bottleneck?
cultofparcraft 1 year ago
lol everything looks cute in the lowest settings xD
PlainIN 1 year ago
on highest u actually can see Chuck Norris waving to you from the Command Center
narasemanga 1 year ago
I think its good that blizz made the game so that you can play SC2 even if you have a moderately good comp. Maybe you dont have the cash to buy a uber comp for 15-20.000 bucks (Thats in swedish kronor ^^) Because, grachips isnt everything. Just look at CS 1.6.
theFloxie 1 year ago
@theFloxie Yej, you're right, look at Call of Duty 1(which for me shares first place with COD 2.)
OpenGLSecond 1 year ago
dammit!!! i can`t play
pivotnaza 1 year ago
the last three stages in medium have so much stuff going on that it's hard to find out what's an actual unit and what's not.
I thought blizzard was not the kind of company who would just jump on the "the more graphic details, the better" bandwagon that 99,99% oft new gen console games jump on.
DaveTheSodaGuy0 1 year ago
but the game is still freaking awesome.
DaveTheSodaGuy0 1 year ago
On lowest settings it's really like Warcraft III lol
Eresdimed 1 year ago
Why only 2GB RAM when you are a gamer, and Windows 7? Just sayin'
Regiald 1 year ago
oh my god those low graphics are painful to watch, it's like how warcraft 3 probably looked when they weren't even at beta yet.
woadancincolours 1 year ago
I think that its the terrain that look much different... The units look almost the same
YapooRD 1 year ago
Am i the only one that likes the low graphs more than high?
bood3e 1 year ago
@bood3e
no you are not allow ^^ i can play in ultra too but dont know low looks better ^^
MrSinanabi 1 year ago
the website says i can't play sc2 but i can just with the lowest settings ^^
oRAzefaZEo 1 year ago
It sucks to be a Protoss player because it tends to lag more if you trying to play on better graphics than low. Reason is the pylon background and most people have high graphics posted on youtube.
Leny1777 1 year ago
will i be able to play on any settings lag free with a stock toshiba satellite L300? someone please respond i wanna know if i can play or if i have to return sc2
pane36 1 year ago
Seeing how it looks on low settings, it should run on a 6 year old PC. But then again, if they designed it that way, who'd buy all the new hardware?
zolikoff 1 year ago
Come on people, low dosen't look THAT bad, besides, graphics don't matter, it's still a fun and addicitng game
Kid15X 1 year ago
Technically the pro do run their game on low setting cause it helps them differentiate the units better.
DontRickRoll 1 year ago
I have a quad core processor, 8gb ram, and an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 graphics card. Is this good enough to run the ultra graphics?
Stratocaster720 1 year ago
@Stratocaster720 It is. i have Ati radeon hd 4850 on imac 27 quad core i5 2540x1440 resolution and the graphics card is designed for laptops and it runs 50-70fps on high.
bood3e 1 year ago
low looks like warcraft3 its shitty
whitejeff420 1 year ago
asdasdasd: but wow is better
asdasdasd: wow is 10 times better
asdasdasd: starcraft is for nerds
asdasdasd: with no life
what my friend said on steam when i said i wouldnt go back to wow because starcraft was better
slimininin 1 year ago 2
You should probably get a 64bit OS and upgrade to at least 4GB of 1333 MHz DDR3
reddot44 1 year ago
On the "can you run it" site I got about a third of the way between min requirements and recommended, does this mean I am stuck on the lowest graphics settings or can I run med at a pinch? :D
Gregoire117 1 year ago
what i hate about the lowest setting is that the picture is not animated
gottaloveTF2 1 year ago
you recon an intel core i5 760 quad core, ati radeon 6850 and 6gb will run this game on max settings without hastle?
zabbestpriest 1 year ago
Hey i went to your site and it showed me as in between low and high graphics does that mean it will run fine on medium graphics?
RathaDiablo 1 year ago 8