Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (47)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i think you have put in the wrong context when you talk about entropy & thermodynamic efficiency vs your theory about quantum energy transfer. Thermodynamic efficiency is not talk about there is nothing 100% energy transfer. but it define that any THERMODYNAMIC HEAT ENGINE that had cycle operation, cannot convert 100% heat into work. But some heat must be discarded into environtment

    HEAT ENGINE CYCLE is underlined. because that is the context.

  • Frank just got out the Windex and cleaned 2/3 of the crap off your' windshield so you can see where you're goin' Keep up the good work!!

    Be safe, be happy, [and don't blind people drive!]

    ..............................­.........db

  • Bow-Bow.

    You said it, scientists have become a cult. Even though Frank Z should be like the teachers pet writing a shortcut on the blackboard - they are threatened and angry. Imagine if Planck could see. He would just surge further forward. Not whine Frank just got out the Windex and cleaned 2/3 of the crap off your' windshield so you can see where you're goin'

    because someone knew a more direct equation. An easier one. Math is only an analogy of reality Guys -get a clue.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Frank sounds pretty damn clever.

  • You are doing very well balancing this. Still I don't think most people will get it. And thats ok too, the world needs mailmen. I am not condescending really I am not.

  • One of the best videos I've seen in a while! You definitely need to make more videos like this! You should configure your social account at xInd.ca with your youtube channel so we can promote your videos for you and get you more subscribers on youtube. It will automatically embed your videos into posts which automatically gets posted through our network and watched by our members and visitors.

  • So h = Q^2 / 4eVt

    What is Q? Why does the photon capacitor have this charge?

  • @fcb955ff When I tried to solve for Q using Vt I got Q=1.6022x10^-19. Which if i'm not mistaken is the charge of an electron.

  • What hte name of the song playing in the background?

  • I've heard somewhere that, once collapsed, the wave function for any macroscopic object will stay collapsed. This notion of the moon reverting back to a wave of potentials or whatever was absurd before I even started watching these vids. Silly solipsists. =P I'm glad you called them out on it, though, because it does seem rather pervasive....

  • I've been thinking about quantum mechanics as "magical" since I started reading about it, maybe a decade ago. It's hard to imagine that classical laws might apply.

  • Thumbs up if you are cool with sending seattle.truth @ gmail a Paypal gift of $10.94

  • nice video, theyre getting better btw

  • Part 16:

    /watch?v=F0Td8juY1nw

  • great!

  • Comment removed

  • Great videos. Congratulation to Frank and you for this incredible work. I looking forward for the next part!!! One thing I don´t understand is that now the Planck constant, h, is derived from another constant (the speed of transition, Vt = 1.094 MHz·m ) so at the end there is always a constant involved. I mean that it would be great if "h" could be derived without needing any new constant ¿Is it better to use "Vt" instead of "h"? Thanks for your reply

  • @hanon1492 The difference is that planck's constant is only measured by experiments. They cant show what it is derived from.

    The speed of transition can be proven from first principles, meaning that it is not simply empiracle. Vt is the underlying cause of planck's constant, not the otherway around. Thats why its so important.

  • Thanks again!

  • i know how you feel about not finding a job man. waiting for a big change myself. im glad everyone else can feel it too or i would feel crazy

  • would it be possible to contact you by some means?

  • you can send me a msg on youtube. or my email is seattle.truth @ gmail (dont forget the period in between seattle and truth) ... i have skype and yahoo too

  • @seattle4truth ladies, holla at me... yahoo IM: seattle.truth

    skype: seattletruth

    lol

  • Watched from part one until now... nice work! I've been reading about lots of the topics you cover for the last year and a half and I could have skipped a lot of reading had this been available. Thank you immensely for your contributions!

  • Good stuff ! Thanks for the upload and reply lol

    I couldn't find part 14. Couldn't it all be pulled into a playlist so all the parts can be seen together in a sequence?

  • @totallyfreeenergy yes it is at bit(dot)ly/95eBPm for the URL.

    I will add it to the info of the videos... I just been so busy. Sterling just made the pack 2 days ago :D

  • Awesome! yes, very happy now! Respect!

  • @educution you were the one who brought up the percussion wave analogy right? thanks

  • whats the background music?? =]

  • @Desert1231 the background music is a producer on soundclick named "Allrounda Productions", the song is called "man in the mirror".

    The intro music video was V.I.C. ft J Futuristic (AKA J. Money) - Bow

  • you define the fine structure constant from first principles, and somehow do the impossible... relate rap to physics.

    Seriously now though... the fine structure constant was originall thought to be related to the electrons speed in the first orbital (ground state) and the speed of light in vacume... so they were almost right, they just needed to know that transition from orbitals is not instantaneous.... info from wikiversity just type in fine structure wikiversity into google itll come up.

  • great work again! Just stick to your own plan!

  • @apezak what plan??? LOL i thought this series was only gonna be 3 or 4 videos long when i started making it lol

  • digging it dude ;-)

  • this stuff is awsome......watch out for the men in black if i were u lol.......blown away by it all

  • Excellent Series!! Keep it coming!!

  • IT makes perfect sense. It's like shifting without using the clutch - when the rpm's match no clutch is required.

  • @Snowflake70 Yes, exactly. That is also the first thing i thought of in regards to a mechanical impedance match. thank you for reminding me, it slipped my mind.

    great minds think alike lol :P

  • @TheAmoShow no

  • awesome series

    and dude u are

    godspeed to yah buddy

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more