A person can only be wrong about a thing if objective truth exists and as every atheist/agnostic must admit that sometime in their lives they have been wrong about something.
Einstein showed that space, matter, and time all had a simultaneous beginning, and all three are a union expressed in triune diversity. All three, space, matter, and time are physical. Space and time are physical as matter and can be altered by gravity. Dr. Henry Morris, creationist and scientist, pointed out how the triune oneness of the universe is a reflection of its Creator!
After an hour of listening to this debate,I find it really illogical for a person to be an agnostic.Mr.Hubner laid the arguments for his stand very well while Mr.Wallis poorly defined his reasoning.After the first rebuttal from Mr.Hubner it was very clear that Ben wasn't really sure of what he was talking about.He can't give clear answers to the objections raised by his opponent. I shall continue listening and finishing the whole debate.This is a brilliant way of defining or simplifying belief
@MrMaika77 Well ben has a point, How can an atheist say x is objectively immoral when atheist believe morals are subjective? The atheist has no basis to account for his morals, now that is not to say an atheist cannot be moral (Courtesy of Christianity) but rather just just cannot account for x is x moral or immoral.
A person can only be wrong about a thing if objective truth exists and as every atheist/agnostic must admit that sometime in their lives they have been wrong about something.
CBALLEN 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Einstein showed that space, matter, and time all had a simultaneous beginning, and all three are a union expressed in triune diversity. All three, space, matter, and time are physical. Space and time are physical as matter and can be altered by gravity. Dr. Henry Morris, creationist and scientist, pointed out how the triune oneness of the universe is a reflection of its Creator!
Mogley52 5 months ago
Comment removed
Mogley52 5 months ago
After an hour of listening to this debate,I find it really illogical for a person to be an agnostic.Mr.Hubner laid the arguments for his stand very well while Mr.Wallis poorly defined his reasoning.After the first rebuttal from Mr.Hubner it was very clear that Ben wasn't really sure of what he was talking about.He can't give clear answers to the objections raised by his opponent. I shall continue listening and finishing the whole debate.This is a brilliant way of defining or simplifying belief
forthetruth101 7 months ago
I'm glad i'm Christian! I love all people and I hope Ben finds his way back to Christ who loves us. Brilliant debate.
YahwehtheLORD 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ben Wallis is good, he is very patience.
I would personally have but-fuck Jamin Hubner. He asks, how Ben can condemn rape when he´s just human.
MrMaika77 9 months ago
@MrMaika77 Well ben has a point, How can an atheist say x is objectively immoral when atheist believe morals are subjective? The atheist has no basis to account for his morals, now that is not to say an atheist cannot be moral (Courtesy of Christianity) but rather just just cannot account for x is x moral or immoral.
Onetruthrgv 9 months ago
@Onetruthrgv We typically uses a rather simple method of determining what is evil. If an action is causing suffering it is considered evil.
Samuria11 9 months ago
@Samuria11 So are you admitting to an objective moral?
Onetruthrgv 8 months ago
@Onetruthrgv Nope, I don't think that's possible. I was just letting you know the method by which we determine whether something is good or evil.
Samuria11 8 months ago
@Samuria11 oh, well thanks
Onetruthrgv 8 months ago
@Onetruthrgv So before Christianity there were no morals? If you say this were do you get your morals from if it is indeed from christianity?
Cougar139tweak 7 months ago in playlist Christian Faith