I am tired of these PNAC bastards! Search: Project for the New American Century. This guy is a war mongering, global domination, asshat! Ron Paul for president! End the wars!
its strange how if an islamic person was saying this he'd be shoved in jail or deported, even if he was talking about something he has nothing to do with, whereas a guy in a suit can fear monger like this and get applauded for it, n tbh anyone notice how he just pretty much tells em what to do n where to cause the most damage? people like him should just disappear with their shit stirring. Its like a fricken cold war all over again..'are you a commie?!'
If it is not a question of if but when, then whatever president you pick won't matter, cause you, by definitions of "not if but when", then it can't be stopped, only slowed.
This man eats too much semen. Turtle head looking sack of shit. Here is hoping someone pours a wheelbarrow full of shit down his shit chomping throat.
Wasn't that the guy who wasn't sure wether RATM was called "The machine rages on" or "Rage against the machine" but who was sure that the band was "anti family and pro-terrorist" ?
sigh...another sad little neocon asshole...seriously we need to stop buying in to all this bullshit and see the world for what it really is. fear does not have to control our lives
Bauer is really stupid: if Obama, as he claims, is really a terrorist sympathiser, then the terrorists would not want to target an - allegedly terrorist-sympathetic gov't.
the greatest threat to america is fear mongering retards....liberals and conservatives please wake up, stop fighting each other and fight the small group of people that run this country.
What planet have you been living on? The term refers to Muslim terrorists. Bet you love terms like "homophobe", don't you? Bet you call anyone that doesn't like Obama a racist, don't you? Hypocrite.
Right.... All of you Obama-bots call people racist that don't approve of his lack of experience, his criminal, terrorist, and racist associates, his wildly far-left policies, his support of infanticide, his desire to have tea with radical leaders hostile to the country, his questionable citizenship.....
You assume too much, calling any non-Obama-bot a "maniac" and "pure evil".
Before making stupid accusations, you'd better have some proof.
WRONG. Scroll up already. The quote is, "Bet you call anyone that doesn't like Obama a racist, don't you?" Nowhere did I say "all of you Obama-bots". Of course, if I had, it would be true. Obama did it himself; why would his minions not follow along?
but we were never debating though, i guess you could say we were debating that what you said with the other guy was stupid, thats all i really said, so technically thats what we are debating
so technically what i said wasn't an ad hominem attack
if the argument is that i said "you don't know what your talking about"
and then you say i have no points to debate
well that was my point ... so again, i call you a jackass (now that was an ad hominem attack)
I know it's a small point, but when you're trying to giving a speech to try and cow people into voting for you by using fear, try to pronounce the words you use correctly.
He doesn't seem to know the difference between a radiologically enhanced conventional explosive devise ("dirty bomb") and a thermo-nuclear detonation.
LOL!
Momma always said, "Stupid is as Stupid does."
How exactly would a former junior Naval staff officer and absentee member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committe member (23% attendance) stop a determined secret cell with a "bomb" of any kind...or be any more able to deal with the aftermath than his buddy Bush?
The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.
Even the biggest "dirty bombs" aren't quite as big as the nuclear weapons dropped in Japan 60 years ago. There's no reason to believe it'll be a huger threat, or that 100,000 people will die instantly or within a few minutes. The only way that's possible is if the area was extremely dense in population, but even the densest cities have some space.
I mean, even in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, not even close to 100,000 people died within minutes of the blast. It was more like a few thousand.
This idiot Gary Bauer knows nothing about nuclear radiation. Most of the people affected will be affected by fallout, not the initial blast. They will die slowly.
Even Reagan knew when to cut and run, and he did after our barracks was bombed in Lebanon. In fact, during Reagan's administration, if I remember right, we had LESS troops and bases in the Middle East than during Clinton's. And how many attacks did we have on American soil during Clinton's reign? There's the 1993 wtc bombing, 2 embassy bombings, USS Cole, and the list goes on and on.
But these Republicans today put ideology and faith in their own American power and strength above reality. They can't STAND to lose and admit defeat because they have this weird slippery-slope mentality that "if we lose one battle, we lose them all", which is ridiculous, esp. in the beginning. These people put "honor" and faith in themselves before country.
And if it's a matter of when, not if, why do we have to constantly fearmonger? Why do we have to declare "war" on terrorism??? If you guys admit that terrorism will be here til the end of time, what's the point of trying to stop every damn Islamic terrorist?? It's not possible.
Ron Paul was right all along: Our military interventions in the Middle East are a major CONTRIBUTING FACTOR to why they try to bomb us! Wake the fuck up, Republicans. Read a book for a change. Don't be some ignorant sheep who listens to Fox News all the time. I mean, this is so obvious! Faith alone cannot possibly be a reason why terrorists attack. People don't just commit attacks on others because their religion says so; they do it also for real reasons, stupid or reasonable.
Did the Inquisition happen just b/c religion said heretics should die? No, not exactly. It was BECAUSE religious fanatics thought they had reason to believe "heretics" would corrupt their societies. Now, that was insane, but at least they had reasons for doing it. They didn't just do it out of loyalty to God entirely.
It's the same with Islamic terrorism. We have to stop getting in the belly of the beast and getting sucked into the terrorism trap. Stop invading the Middle East!
If this guy tried he could do a mean Mr. Bean. Perferably with a fake Hitler mustache.
gphx 2 weeks ago
No no no Gary, YOU are going to die if you dont stop lying.
you fucking traitor. you dont care about the american people.
GARLlCjr 1 month ago
We are all going to die so its ok for me to fuck my 26 year old deputy campaign manger behind my wifes back.
gonadcancervictim 1 month ago
I am tired of these PNAC bastards! Search: Project for the New American Century. This guy is a war mongering, global domination, asshat! Ron Paul for president! End the wars!
RonPaulKicksAss 1 month ago
we are on to you Gary Bauer scrutiny is a bitch
alexfreypattaya 1 month ago
its strange how if an islamic person was saying this he'd be shoved in jail or deported, even if he was talking about something he has nothing to do with, whereas a guy in a suit can fear monger like this and get applauded for it, n tbh anyone notice how he just pretty much tells em what to do n where to cause the most damage? people like him should just disappear with their shit stirring. Its like a fricken cold war all over again..'are you a commie?!'
jekkareighner 1 year ago
what a douchebag closet faggot!
he is just SCREAMING to be fisted!
i can hear him ''... o, o, fist me w!
thegoochieguy 2 years ago 2
"Evil men who worship death?"
..He is full of a stinking pile of shit..
aGothicStory 2 years ago 2
If it is not a question of if but when, then whatever president you pick won't matter, cause you, by definitions of "not if but when", then it can't be stopped, only slowed.
gldni17 2 years ago
This man eats too much semen. Turtle head looking sack of shit. Here is hoping someone pours a wheelbarrow full of shit down his shit chomping throat.
torque122 2 years ago 3
Wasn't that the guy who wasn't sure wether RATM was called "The machine rages on" or "Rage against the machine" but who was sure that the band was "anti family and pro-terrorist" ?
GendPzTrSchmidt 3 years ago 6
yeah he did say that if you look up the video "Sleep now in the Fire" it right at the end after they shut down wall street.
Fuck Gary Bauer
and his fucking dumb beliefs about terrorism
CorBinKaY76 2 years ago 4
typical republican doomsday scare rhetoric...pathetic.
MuscleMaxZ1 3 years ago 4
sigh...another sad little neocon asshole...seriously we need to stop buying in to all this bullshit and see the world for what it really is. fear does not have to control our lives
manny4life 3 years ago 5
Bauer is really stupid: if Obama, as he claims, is really a terrorist sympathiser, then the terrorists would not want to target an - allegedly terrorist-sympathetic gov't.
nightofcrimson13 3 years ago 3
The Talibangelists support McCain - big surprise.
nightflyer28 3 years ago
the greatest threat to america is fear mongering retards....liberals and conservatives please wake up, stop fighting each other and fight the small group of people that run this country.
manny4life 3 years ago
Be afraid! Be very afraid! What the hell is an Islamo-Fascist Terrorist?
This is a phrase created by the right wing maniacs. The right-wing is pure evil.
acmedata 3 years ago
What planet have you been living on? The term refers to Muslim terrorists. Bet you love terms like "homophobe", don't you? Bet you call anyone that doesn't like Obama a racist, don't you? Hypocrite.
LadyGreenEyes964 3 years ago
Ummm ... yeah.
No, I would call anybody that doesn't like Obama "a person exercising their personal opinion."
You assume too much. Remember what happens if you assume. You make an ass out of you, but not me. :-)
I don't care about homophobes, but I do care that there are so many pedophiles amongst the conservative leaders.
acmedata 3 years ago 2
Right.... All of you Obama-bots call people racist that don't approve of his lack of experience, his criminal, terrorist, and racist associates, his wildly far-left policies, his support of infanticide, his desire to have tea with radical leaders hostile to the country, his questionable citizenship.....
You assume too much, calling any non-Obama-bot a "maniac" and "pure evil".
Before making stupid accusations, you'd better have some proof.
LadyGreenEyes964 3 years ago
Wow. Chill out. I never accused anybody of being a racist. You must have some real issues you need to work on.
acmedata 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I said you called people "maniac" and "pure evil" - not racist. Can you read?
LadyGreenEyes964 3 years ago
Yes, I can read.
You said: "Right.... All of you Obama-bots call people racist that don't approve of his ..."
See, YOU were accusing people of calling people racist, not me.
acmedata 3 years ago 8
WRONG. Scroll up already. The quote is, "Bet you call anyone that doesn't like Obama a racist, don't you?" Nowhere did I say "all of you Obama-bots". Of course, if I had, it would be true. Obama did it himself; why would his minions not follow along?
LadyGreenEyes964 3 years ago
lol ladygreeneyes is a jackass who doesn't even know what she says
andretheking86 3 years ago
LOL, andrethewannabeking is a bad debater that has to resort to ad hominem attacks because he has no valid points with which to debate.
LadyGreenEyes964 3 years ago
yea because i was "debating" you with one comment right? im pretty sure you have me confused with the acmedata guy...
and i stick by my comment, did you even read what you said with the guy u were talking to? lol, obviously your a jackass
andretheking86 3 years ago
No, I was talking to YOU, regarding your comment with nothing but an insult. I see you still haven't learned anything better.
LadyGreenEyes964 3 years ago
but we were never debating though, i guess you could say we were debating that what you said with the other guy was stupid, thats all i really said, so technically thats what we are debating
so technically what i said wasn't an ad hominem attack
if the argument is that i said "you don't know what your talking about"
and then you say i have no points to debate
well that was my point ... so again, i call you a jackass (now that was an ad hominem attack)
andretheking86 3 years ago
The point is you offered NOTHING to the discussion but a stupid insult; a clear sign that you have nothing better, and know you can't win.
LadyGreenEyes964 3 years ago
"winning" a youtube fight is like winning the special olympics ...
andretheking86 3 years ago
Sadly, you will probably never know. Nice though, for you to admit to prejudice against those in the Special Olympics.
LadyGreenEyes964 3 years ago
why are you still commenting me
andretheking86 3 years ago
Because you keep responding?
LadyGreenEyes964 3 years ago
I know it's a small point, but when you're trying to giving a speech to try and cow people into voting for you by using fear, try to pronounce the words you use correctly.
"Frivolities" NOT "Friviolities"
mw2000 3 years ago
Gary is NO Jack Bauer!
He doesn't seem to know the difference between a radiologically enhanced conventional explosive devise ("dirty bomb") and a thermo-nuclear detonation.
LOL!
Momma always said, "Stupid is as Stupid does."
How exactly would a former junior Naval staff officer and absentee member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committe member (23% attendance) stop a determined secret cell with a "bomb" of any kind...or be any more able to deal with the aftermath than his buddy Bush?
dogstar7 3 years ago
Why is this little elf so mad?
theBigTakeover 3 years ago
The greatest threat right now to America is the Republican party.
voyzovrezon 3 years ago 6
Amen
lydiasaintjohn 3 years ago
I'll say Amen to that too. You hit the nail right on the head.
47of74 3 years ago
AMEN!!!!
acmedata 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.
Whoo69 3 years ago
Why doesn't Gary Bauer mention how little Bush has done to stop his 1-in-a-million chance scenario from happening? What a douche
Whoo69 3 years ago
Even the biggest "dirty bombs" aren't quite as big as the nuclear weapons dropped in Japan 60 years ago. There's no reason to believe it'll be a huger threat, or that 100,000 people will die instantly or within a few minutes. The only way that's possible is if the area was extremely dense in population, but even the densest cities have some space.
I mean, even in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, not even close to 100,000 people died within minutes of the blast. It was more like a few thousand.
Whoo69 3 years ago
This idiot Gary Bauer knows nothing about nuclear radiation. Most of the people affected will be affected by fallout, not the initial blast. They will die slowly.
Whoo69 3 years ago
Even Reagan knew when to cut and run, and he did after our barracks was bombed in Lebanon. In fact, during Reagan's administration, if I remember right, we had LESS troops and bases in the Middle East than during Clinton's. And how many attacks did we have on American soil during Clinton's reign? There's the 1993 wtc bombing, 2 embassy bombings, USS Cole, and the list goes on and on.
Whoo69 3 years ago
But these Republicans today put ideology and faith in their own American power and strength above reality. They can't STAND to lose and admit defeat because they have this weird slippery-slope mentality that "if we lose one battle, we lose them all", which is ridiculous, esp. in the beginning. These people put "honor" and faith in themselves before country.
"Country first", my ass!
Whoo69 3 years ago
And if it's a matter of when, not if, why do we have to constantly fearmonger? Why do we have to declare "war" on terrorism??? If you guys admit that terrorism will be here til the end of time, what's the point of trying to stop every damn Islamic terrorist?? It's not possible.
Whoo69 3 years ago
Ron Paul was right all along: Our military interventions in the Middle East are a major CONTRIBUTING FACTOR to why they try to bomb us! Wake the fuck up, Republicans. Read a book for a change. Don't be some ignorant sheep who listens to Fox News all the time. I mean, this is so obvious! Faith alone cannot possibly be a reason why terrorists attack. People don't just commit attacks on others because their religion says so; they do it also for real reasons, stupid or reasonable.
Whoo69 3 years ago
Did the Inquisition happen just b/c religion said heretics should die? No, not exactly. It was BECAUSE religious fanatics thought they had reason to believe "heretics" would corrupt their societies. Now, that was insane, but at least they had reasons for doing it. They didn't just do it out of loyalty to God entirely.
It's the same with Islamic terrorism. We have to stop getting in the belly of the beast and getting sucked into the terrorism trap. Stop invading the Middle East!
Whoo69 3 years ago
What a loon. The only people conspiring to bring us more sorrow are Bush and Cheney.
AndrewMann552 3 years ago
When did they let that guy out of the looney bin?
dhendrix63 3 years ago
Oh God, they're blaming Obama for the Bush adminstration's failure to combat nuclear terrorism now too?
What's that I smell? Could it be, fear mongering?! At an ultra right wing convention? Surely not!
mw2000 3 years ago