Would be nice to have easier access to an arcade perfect port, but Sega are reluctant to bring Shenmue and Jet Set Radio to XBLA let alone a vastly outdated fighting game, not to mention we have VF5 Final Showdown on the way sometime this year.
Yes, Sega arcades were graphically way ahead of its time. I hope Model 3 could be emulated someday, cause I want to play Virtua Striker 2, Daytona 2, VF3 arcade versions (not Dreamcast).
I remember seeing this in arcades back in '98...now remember, this was 2 YEARS after this game had come out. I couldn't believe my eyes..that my joystick input was controlling characters in an environment that looked like that...
The machine I played it on had a banner over it saying "real time cg system" and by god I believed it...I thought I was playing FMV. It was visually stunning and years ahead of its time.
@pornostar100 lol i am sega fan for ages but the only system sega could make this time for make graphics is for shittracing because of the budget for the arcade machines is cut and is not compare to the budget of the 90.sega will always be the best for me software and hardware but after the dreamcast era sega is dead and the dreamcast 2 roumors its shit.sega is dead long live history and dreamcast
compared to VF1 and 2, the 3rd installment was relatively easy but definitely not a button pushing game. i believe they said VF3 had 1000s of moves.... i'm drunk, time to drink now....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
vf 1 and 2 were awesome back in the day, but so many years have passed since than and they haven't improved this dated fighter one bit. How about some original ideas, real innovations, cutting edge? no sign of them, and hardware is of course not the problem.
all i can say the first time i saw virtua fighter 3 it was a holy moment somthing that i still feel to this very day that game was more than amazing at that time back in 1996 the thought of a sega home system running this arcade perfect i would have sold my soul to the devil for money to by that sega console
4 Was all about twitchy combos and whoever can mash buttons fast enough, and was the furthest from the original Virtua fighter spirit of calculated strikes.
3 was not as good as 2, but still had enough sense to not have psycho combos systems.
Leave combos for the unwashed tekken masses.
We virtua fighter players eat with utensils, while tekken players eat with their hands like animals, filthy PlayStation playing animals.
i've always wondered why the hand and finger models were shit regardless of whether it was the arcade or FC version..... the rest of EVERYTHING looks great, cept those damn fingers.
Because the MODEL 3 board can only render slightly over 1 million polygons per second.
that's a lot less than last-gen consoles
(DC/PS2/GCN/XBOX) which can render 5M to 20M polygons/sec (with textures, lighting, and all features on). The VF3 character models can only be so detailed. There was nothing that even came close to this in 1996. Other games of the time, Tekken 2 and Tekken 3 looked like crap in comparison.
lol dude ya don't gotta tell me about video game history of Sega's hardware and the 90's :) i know all about it. i was a total Sega fan and this game back in 1996 just made me love Sega more, wat with how graphically stunning it was. VF3 took a dump all over Mario64 lol Still, it would've been nice if they'd touched up the graphics just a little for the Dreamcast version. the DC can handle model 3 without a sweat...
well up until the 128-bit gaming era, that was almost always the case with arcades vs consoles. i wish arcades were still on the cutting edge, but sadly those are years gone past.
oh ya definitely it'd be awesome. you know that there are quite a few arcade games that run on PCs in arcades right? :-) besides, i dunno about you, but for me it's come to the point where graphics aren't even the big impression point anymore since we've just about reached realism...
What kind of monitor are you playing on there? Are you using any kind of convertor or scaler?
vomithero 2 months ago
いいねぇ!!! シュラカもしっかり決めてくるのは、上級者ですね!
kumakifmale2008 4 months ago
for a 1996 game this had mad good graphics.
nooblet911 4 months ago
looks the same as the dreamcast version :)
aubba 9 months ago
I hope this game gets released on Xbox 360 Live Arcade someday because Genki did a piss poor job converting this game to dreamcast back in 1998.
kiltsonfire164 10 months ago
@kiltsonfire164
Would be nice to have easier access to an arcade perfect port, but Sega are reluctant to bring Shenmue and Jet Set Radio to XBLA let alone a vastly outdated fighting game, not to mention we have VF5 Final Showdown on the way sometime this year.
strykah92 1 month ago
Yes, Sega arcades were graphically way ahead of its time. I hope Model 3 could be emulated someday, cause I want to play Virtua Striker 2, Daytona 2, VF3 arcade versions (not Dreamcast).
Aguz25 1 year ago
@Aguz25 u can get the model 3 emulator. i had it myself and had VF3 working on it but, i need a better pc to work it. do a search and u will find it.
david2k 1 year ago
CGボード使ってるーーwどんだけ改造してるんだ!?ていうかどこでCGボードをてにいれたー!?
uchujin118go 1 year ago
I remember seeing this in arcades back in '98...now remember, this was 2 YEARS after this game had come out. I couldn't believe my eyes..that my joystick input was controlling characters in an environment that looked like that...
The machine I played it on had a banner over it saying "real time cg system" and by god I believed it...I thought I was playing FMV. It was visually stunning and years ahead of its time.
luisdiaz1980 1 year ago
14 years passed and the graphics its still good,sega it was always ahead of its time
MetatroN197924 2 years ago 13
SEGA's Model 4 ray tracing capable hardware is currently in development
Further information is to be found at the following address -
fgnonlinedotwebsdotcom
pornostar100 2 years ago
@pornostar100 lol i am sega fan for ages but the only system sega could make this time for make graphics is for shittracing because of the budget for the arcade machines is cut and is not compare to the budget of the 90.sega will always be the best for me software and hardware but after the dreamcast era sega is dead and the dreamcast 2 roumors its shit.sega is dead long live history and dreamcast
MetatroN197924 7 months ago
omg dude where did you get a model 3 . man this guy has all the arcade machins :)
ImaginaryLegion 2 years ago
Where'd you get the board, and for how much? o-o
Purianite 2 years ago
love Virtua Fighter- but it all went downhill after this one.
df61660a 2 years ago
Nope VF5 is the best fighting game at the moment by far!
sybnios 2 years ago 8
look at akiras arms, they didnt look like that in the dreamcast
karadaniano 3 years ago
true but they should have looked like that.
aryinc 2 years ago
Comment removed
nooblet911 3 years ago
I always thought "tb" stands for Team Battle. I may be wrong....
MaximusDread 3 years ago
It does.
tightlypackedcoil 3 years ago
amazingly smooth for its age
nooblet911 3 years ago
compared to VF1 and 2, the 3rd installment was relatively easy but definitely not a button pushing game. i believe they said VF3 had 1000s of moves.... i'm drunk, time to drink now....
JACKYVAMPIRE 3 years ago
i'm about to whip out the ol dreamcast.
this brings back memories.
visually this was the most impressive looking game in the arcades back in 1996.
remember the arcade days. now consoles rule the gamers.
JACKYVAMPIRE 3 years ago
You made Akira look weak
Lau's Stage
BabyCrys44 3 years ago
this game is da shit!! love it ;o;
hiimurakaoru 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
vf 1 and 2 were awesome back in the day, but so many years have passed since than and they haven't improved this dated fighter one bit. How about some original ideas, real innovations, cutting edge? no sign of them, and hardware is of course not the problem.
ROCKNINJA777 3 years ago
this is the most comprehensive fighting game ever made, that's my opinion. VF1 and 2 are completely lame compared to 3.
JACKYVAMPIRE 3 years ago
I just want to know. Why can't the current home consoles do these "old" virtua fighter games right? (Or as they used to say "Arcade perfect")
KEYBEATZ 3 years ago
who said they couldn't do them? the quality of a port or emulation of a title is only as good as the team behind it.
and yes, he current gen of consoles - 360 and PS3, could totally handle these games, in both emulated or ported form.
aj0049 3 years ago
Yeah they say that. But Watch one day when and if they do something will be off.
KEYBEATZ 3 years ago
all i can say the first time i saw virtua fighter 3 it was a holy moment somthing that i still feel to this very day that game was more than amazing at that time back in 1996 the thought of a sega home system running this arcade perfect i would have sold my soul to the devil for money to by that sega console
arkenfeldemigod 4 years ago
vf 2 was released on 96, i think 3 was released in 98
ROCKNINJA777 3 years ago
no,VF2 was released on 1994 and VF3 was released on 1996
uouvictuorxD 3 years ago
No, VF2 was released in late 1994 (Japan) and early 1995 (U.S. and rest of the world).
VF3 was released in 1996.
turbografx 3 years ago
VF3 was the only one I never really played. How is it?
Xatticus 4 years ago
Not as good as two, but better than four.
whiteguysamurai 4 years ago
Personal opinion. They're all good.
Ergeniz 4 years ago
I disagree. I think It wasn't no where near as good as 4. But I do think that 3 wasn't as good as 2.
KEYBEATZ 3 years ago
4 Was all about twitchy combos and whoever can mash buttons fast enough, and was the furthest from the original Virtua fighter spirit of calculated strikes.
3 was not as good as 2, but still had enough sense to not have psycho combos systems.
Leave combos for the unwashed tekken masses.
We virtua fighter players eat with utensils, while tekken players eat with their hands like animals, filthy PlayStation playing animals.
whiteguysamurai 3 years ago 3
AMEN
hiimurakaoru 3 years ago
luls
nooblet911 3 years ago
Virtua Fighter 2 >>> Virtua Fighter 3.
VF3 had a slower pace, but ive only player the dreamcast version.
SuperShadowRyan 4 years ago
well the dreamcast version, its far far away from the original arcade version
karadaniano 3 years ago
you think? I think dreamcast version wasn't that different. the dreamcast produced better graphics than this, just look at soulcalibur
nooblet911 2 years ago
@nooblet911 it's kinda like Tekken
MrTsunayoshisawadax 1 year ago
@MrTsunayoshisawadax The only similarities between the two series is that they're 3D brawlers.
HypnoSwag 1 month ago
Wow, those buttons were taking a pounding, LOL.
Anyway, thanks for the footage.
Rickster75 4 years ago
pretty cool. arcade version >>>>> anything else.
INfintido 4 years ago
i've always wondered why the hand and finger models were shit regardless of whether it was the arcade or FC version..... the rest of EVERYTHING looks great, cept those damn fingers.
aj0049 4 years ago
Because the MODEL 3 board can only render slightly over 1 million polygons per second.
that's a lot less than last-gen consoles
(DC/PS2/GCN/XBOX) which can render 5M to 20M polygons/sec (with textures, lighting, and all features on). The VF3 character models can only be so detailed. There was nothing that even came close to this in 1996. Other games of the time, Tekken 2 and Tekken 3 looked like crap in comparison.
turbografx 3 years ago
lol dude ya don't gotta tell me about video game history of Sega's hardware and the 90's :) i know all about it. i was a total Sega fan and this game back in 1996 just made me love Sega more, wat with how graphically stunning it was. VF3 took a dump all over Mario64 lol Still, it would've been nice if they'd touched up the graphics just a little for the Dreamcast version. the DC can handle model 3 without a sweat...
aj0049 3 years ago
mario 64 and this were two totaly different games, so dont talk crap. especially because this was on the arcades and mario 64 was on a home console
nooblet911 3 years ago
hey n00b, did you even read all 3 posts in the correct order? cuz i swear you're taking this the wrong way >_>
either way, if you can give me a better graphical achievement from back in 1996 to compare VF3 to, then be my guest...
aj0049 3 years ago
yes it was the most graphically advanced game in 1996, but it was not available for home systems. thats was my point
nooblet911 3 years ago
well up until the 128-bit gaming era, that was almost always the case with arcades vs consoles. i wish arcades were still on the cutting edge, but sadly those are years gone past.
aj0049 3 years ago
yeah that would be cool. immagine how good could a arcade game look with the latest pc technology
nooblet911 3 years ago 2
oh ya definitely it'd be awesome. you know that there are quite a few arcade games that run on PCs in arcades right? :-) besides, i dunno about you, but for me it's come to the point where graphics aren't even the big impression point anymore since we've just about reached realism...
aj0049 3 years ago
I think the next big step should be surrealism, ha ha
nooblet911 3 years ago
aww, dude, how did you emulate this
miiwii93 4 years ago
He brought the model 3 broad; not using emulator.
SpkRay 4 years ago
awsome. theyre probably expensive. i have the DC ver. anyway, so im all set
miiwii93 4 years ago
Actually they're not this day and age. You do however have to go through the trouble of setting everything up.
eswat 4 years ago
He is not emulating it.
It's running on a real MODEL 3 board.
turbografx 3 years ago
Thank you for bringing back good memories.
SonicX14 4 years ago