@chrispudneyblitz As irrelevant as that was, I beg to differ. How can you even tell? You can't see Buckethead's facial expressions, who knows how "passionately" he plays? Paul Gilbert always makes epic faces and seems really happy when he plays, so he does play very "passionately" - even though this has nothing to do with skill. So why the fuck did you even bring it up?
@Merioc2k3 you obviously aren't a guitarist xD passionate guitar playing is to do with feel... listen to padmasana and then tell me you don't know buckethead is passionate. and paul gilbert is just fast - he has absolutely no feel. buckethead is the ultimate master of guitar
@chrispudneyblitz I play guitar for at least 5 hours a day. Yes, I'm a guitarist.
I love both Buckethead and Paul Gilbert, and the argument about "feeling" is at the very least retarded. Feeling in music does not lie in the finger of the player, but in the ear of the listener, and is thus an invalid argument.
Paul Gilbert is not just fast, you've just proven how little you know about him.
@chrispudneyblitz I'd also like to add that your assumption that I'm not a guitarist just because I don't agree with your somewhat idiotic opinion is just insulting.
@Merioc2k3 feeling lies in how hard you pick, how much vibrato you use, which phrases you choose. listen to guitarists like david gilmour, who is in my opinion, the best guitarist for feeling in the world. the feeling that the listener gets is a different type of feeling: an emotion that is caused by the how the guitarist and other musicians play the music. and if you can give me a song by paul 'i wank over myself' gilbert that contains such feeling, i will happily apologise for that statement
@chrispudneyblitz That is...RETARDED. Those are all TECHNIQUES. How you combine them makes you an unique guitarist, the reason why you'll never hear Paul Gilbert play like David Gilmour is because THEY'RE DIFFERENT TYPES OF GUITARISTS.
Feeling is not in vibrato, in phrasing or how hard you pick. However, these techniques can be pleasing to a persons ear.
What about people who don't like David Gilmour or guitarists with good phrasing and vibrato? Are they sociopaths?
@Merioc2k3 i can see now that you are a lost cause :/ yes they are techniques, but they are FEELING techniques. a good guitarist, eg. buckethead and gilmour, like i said can combine speed and feeling. gilbert cannot, and the simple fact that you can't even tell me a paul gilbert song with feeling proves this point.
@chrispudneyblitz Lost cause? Bwahahahahahaha. "Feeling techniques", the very name of it is laughable. No, the feeling lies in the ear of the listener, no matter what you say. The whole argument of saying that someone is better simply because they have more "feeling" is (most of the time) a way of justifying the fact that you like a crappy guitarist.
Though, here it is different. You're using it to justify your hate towards Paul Gilbert. Why do you hate him so much?
@chrispudneyblitz Oh, and if you want such a song by Paul Gilbert, listen to "I still have that other girl". It's slow, but still good and lives up to your criteria to what "feeling" is (even though it's complete bullshit).
If you think he can't combine feeling and speed, then you're wrong as fuck there, too. He has some of the best phrasing of all shredders, he plays extremely clean, he has excellent vibrato and his picking technique is godly. Why do you hate him?
@Merioc2k3 yes, lost cause. what is laughable my stupid friend is your stubbornness and arrogance. what you have repeatedly indicated is that whatever music plays, the listener can still produce the same emotion, meaning that the ballad of the buckethead can make someone feel the same as, for example, for mom by the same guitarist. this is called 'BULLSHIT' xD i dont hate gilbert, and after listening to i still have that other girl, i now realise that he can play with feel, so i apologise
@chrispudneyblitz Of course I'm stubborn and arrogant. You know why? Because I'm right!
Yes, the ballad of Buckethead can make someone feel just the way someone else feels when they hear For Mom. As can any other song, for that matter. BECAUSE IT'S IN THE EAR OF THE LISTENER, NOT THE FINGER/VOICE/HANDS/WHATEVER OF THE MUSICIAN!
@Merioc2k3 mate, just think whatever you want, but you are wrong. different things make you feel different emotions. if what you're saying is true, then that could extend to other things outside of music. maybe you would laugh at your mother's funeral?
@chrispudneyblitz The first thing is true, but that only applies to the individual. You really think that everyone would react exactly the same way to the same thing? No, everyone would react differently.
Ye,s it DOES extend to things outside of music. And yes, I do believe there are some people who would laugh at their mother's funeral.
@Merioc2k3 thank god, you're finally showing some sense haha! no, i don't expect everyone to react EXACTLY the same way, but then again, i also don't expect them to react completely oppositely
@chrispudneyblitz People are different. While you may not feel the way you do when you hear Soothsayer as you do when you hear "Bad Romance", there's people who do. Which means that "feeling" should not be a criteria for judging if a guitarist is good or not, because that depends on the listener.
@chrispudneyblitz What? Yes I am, I'm talking about how feeling is in the ear of the listener, which I've repeated throughout all of my comments. I'm guessing you're just realizing you're wrong and you feel like backing out of this conversation before you have to admit it.
@Merioc2k3 unlike you, i don't need to repeat the same fucking sentence four times!! xD what i have been getting at however throughout all of this conversation is the that is A DIFFERENT SORT OF FEEEEEEEEEEEEELINGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you cant seem to get that into your thick skull xD
@chrispudneyblitz I wouldn't have had to repeat myself if you'd just get it the first time.
What do you mean "Different sort of feeling"? That there's feeling in both the actual playing, other than that which the listener projects upon the music? If so, there probably is, since the musician most likely has some sort of emotional attachment to the song. However, this is irrelevant to whether or not the song is appealing to the listener, and thus irrelevant completely to this conversation.
@woodsterix Nobody gives a shit about your opinion, and as far as it comes to technical ability, Buckethead eats Steve Vai for breakfast. You can't possibly deny that. The rest is just a matter of taste, and trying to force your personal preferences down my throat makes you a fucking retard.
@Merioc2k3 Vai eats Buckethead for breakfast? and what measurement do you have for this good sir? You opinion. By the way, music can create emotions you fucking retard.
@woodsterix I said the opposite, Buckethead eats Vai for breakfast.
Well, first of all, they're both amazing guitarist, but Buckethead has cleaner and more complicated sweeps, is better at tapping, playing staccato, playing legato, string skipping and pretty much everything else.
I never said that music can't create emotions. You should actually read what I said before you answer me, retard.
@Merioc2k3 You find me a single lick that steve has played unclean, a single run that buckethead has done better. You're so wrong... Sorry. Steve understands that you should play melodically too... :O
@woodsterix They don't play the same licks. Also, I know that Steve plays very clean, but what I'm saying is that Buckethead plays way more complex things and he does it perfectly clean.
Buckethead plays very melodic things. Just search for "Acoustic shards" and listen to pretty much whatever pops up by Buckethead, or listen to "Soothsayer".
@woodsterix dude go listen to 'for mom' by buckethead... you seem to think he just shreds but he does some beautiful melodic stuff as well. 'padmasana' and 'soothsayer' are also really good ;)
@woodsterix vai=ok, pink floyd=amazing, buckethead=also amazing in a different way - if you dont like buckethead why the fuck are you watching one of his videos?? xD
@chrispudneyblitz BECAUSE I COMMENT ON FACEBOOK PUDNEY! :O I WANTED TO SEE A CRAP ARGUEMENT! But Vai is amazing, you just have to listen to the right stuff he does tracks for people wanting shred and then theres the good stuff.
@Merioc2k3 dude, you clearly have no understanding of guitar beyond the appeal of a high-gain setup and fast-playing, go plug the £2,000 Flying V you barely know how to play into your 100w amp, leave the distortion at 10 where it's always been and play smoke on the water for a bit, blow off some steam :')
@7752 Hahahaha, what a fucking outrageously insulting assumption. I don't play a Flying V, first of all, and I have a 15W amp. The distortion might be at 10, but that's because I grew up to the sound of heavily distorted guitars.
Also, I don't play fast. I prefer bluesy rock in the style of Jimmy Page and such.
By the way, what leads you to the assumption that I have no understanding of music? Just curious.
@Merioc2k3 "By the way, what leads you to the assumption that I have no understanding of music? Just curious." You like buckethead... Enough said. You Buckethead lost in an audition for the red hot chili peppers to DAVE NAVARRO. are you kidding me...
@woodsterix Irrelevant, he's an amazingly brilliant musician. They said that they didn't choose him because they wanted a guitarist who could also "kick a groove". I'm pretty sure they knew he'd outstage them all, too.
The fact that you even used that as an argument proves what a fucking retard you are.
@Merioc2k3 this is hilarious, you clearly don't understand wit. and if you knew a reasonable amount about music (enough to warrant having such a strong opinion you think you can win an argument against 3 people on youtube), you'd have an understanding of feel when playing guitar which would've saved you the embarrassment of getting into this hollow argument in the first place :')
@7752 Hahaha. If you were sarcastic or anything, just know that stuff like that usually go unnoticed in text.
I'm not saying that I know everything about music, but I know enough to judge that Buckethead is superior to Vai when it comes to technical skill. The fact that there are 3 people arguing against me proves NOTHING, you do realize that, right?
"Understanding of feel"? I've just explained exactly everything regarding my opinion on this, be more specific and tell me what you disagree with.
@Merioc2k3 sarcasm goes unnoticed in text, wit doesn't. your arguements are beyond unjustified, I could start pointing out how you can make a drumkit sound more like a piano than an actual piano and my argument would be more valid than anything you've said so far today.
Why are my arguments unjustified? And no, you couldn't. I'm not even quite sure which of my statement(s) you're attacking, and that makes them hard to defend. Could you specify?
@chrispudneyblitz What? What I said was that whatever feeling that the player might have towards the song he's playing, it doesn't shine through. And that the only "feeling" there is, FROM A LISTENERS PERSPECTIVE (I thought this was obvious, I guess not) varies from person to person.
@Merioc2k3 literally every musician in the world apart from you seems to knows that you can put feeing into music. stop calling people retards, as it seems like the only fucking insult you know and look in the mirror for a bit - you're the retard mate
@chrispudneyblitz Again you've completely looked past EVERYTHING I'VE SAID AND ARGUED FOR. You're the fucking retard. Do I have to repeat myself?
Yes, a musician can have an emotional attachment to a song. However, this does not shine through and is not in any way obvious to the listener. What the listener might "feel" when he hears that specific song is not in any way connected to what the musician felt. Have I made myself clear enough, or do I have to dumb it down even further? Retard.
@Merioc2k3 for the last fucking time, I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT AN EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT!!!!!!! feeling in music is how you play it in a way that it conveys feelings to the listener. plus, its spelt 'realise', not 'realize', dipshit xD
@chrispudneyblitz Well, what ARE you talking about? Your bullshit "feeling techniques"? Hahahahaha. "Look, I've perfected the technique of FEELING!" Pure and utter bullshit.
Judging by your other description of it, "feeling" is adapting your playing style to what people like. Selling out, much? Haha. You can't really convey feeling in such a way as you describe, SINCE EVERYONE REACTS DIFFERENT TO DIFFERENT EXPERIENCES, CAN YOU AT LEAST UNDERSTAND THAT?
@Merioc2k3 feeling in guitar terms is a combination of techniques, yes: techniques, that convey emotion in a persons playing. i am not talking about human feeling, which is different, not completely different, as you need human feeling to be able to play the guitar with feeling, but still different. ask any guitarist, they'll tell you the same
also, yes it is unless you're american, which you're not. you're swedish according to your profile, therefore you use the English spelling: realise
@chrispudneyblitz You can't convey emotion in your playing. You just can't. As I said, what the player feels and what the listener feels are two completely different things, and therefore, the feeling is not conveyed. Do you understand?
The rest is just retarded. I'm a guitarist, and I beg to differ, so that's not true. And I know plenty of people who would agree with me.
Also, you have no right at all to dictate what English dialect I use. Asswipe.
@Merioc2k3 of course you fucking can! ill use baby terms cos thats obviously all you can understand: once upon a time, there was a man called eric clapton and one day his son went to live up in the sky. he was very sad so he decided to write a song called 'tears in heaven'. when everyone heard his song, they were all sad as well. his emotion was and is the same as the listener, even if the listener doesnt know the story behind the song
and yes i can, because you're swedish, not american
@chrispudneyblitz Hahaha, you're retarded. I've heard the song "Tears in Heaven", and there's a difference when it comes to songs that actually have lyrics. Lyrics are interpretable in a way that songs without lyrics aren't.
Also, it doesn't mean shit if I'm Swedish, American or a fucking penguin for that matter. You have no right at all to dictate such things. Retard.
@Merioc2k3 haha there you go with the 'retard' insult again xD and even without lyrics, emotion in music stretches back to lesson 1: major or minor, ie happy or sad [ :) or :( ] listen to air by bach and tell me which emotion you feel
Are you serious? So you're saying that it is IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to think any different than that major = happy and minor = sad? That's purely retarded.
@Merioc2k3 erm yes, yes i am xD thats kind of fundamental in music haha! and pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease find a new insult, at least just for one or two comments?
@chrispudneyblitz Hahahahaha, you're dumber than I thought. For an example, whenever I listen to Niccolo Paganini's 24th Caprice in A MINOR I get happy. So no, it's not true. It's true that it is commonly believed that songs in a major key are happy and songs in a minor key are sad, but it's not true. There are SEVERAL exceptions, and I've already named one. And if it's not universally true, it's not true at all.
@Merioc2k3 thats because pagaini modulates to major keys - its only called caprice 24 in A minor because it starts in A minor. it actually starts to modulate during the first phrase
and the shoe doesn't fit actually. i got like the best results in the whole year, and got an A in music. i also have a merit in music theory grade 5, so please dont start to argue with me about the theoretical side of it (keys etc) because in all fairness, you will lose
And you really think that grades are a merit for measuring one's intelligence? That's purely retarded.
Also, this has NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER been about the theoretical side of music. It's about how people reacts to music, and that there is no rules to how people should feel when they listen to music that's in a certain key and stuff like that, as you seem to think.
@chrispudneyblitz LOL. That's just sad...From what I've understood it, intelligence usually has a negative effect on your grades due to the fact that "Cogito, ergo doleo" is more or less a fact for most intelligent people, and depression would kind of kill your will to study or perform good in school.
But, how can you seriously believe that EVERYONE feels sad when they hear a song in a minor key, and happy when they hear a song in a major key? It's just...Dumb. So very, very fucking dumb.
@Merioc2k3 that is utter bollocks! im very intelligent - i always have been - and i am in no way depressed.
and your argument is pretty much exactly what composers were thinking in the 20th century when they created experimental discordant orchestral 'music'. it didnt work btw, which is why minimalism took over pretty quickly and moved music back into the concept of major and minor, happy and sad
@chrispudneyblitz I'm sorry, I started laughing when I read that "I'm very intelligent - I always have been".
You may THINK you're intelligent, but you're not. The human race consists of only idiots. We're all idiots. Haha.
I don't really see how you can use that as an example. I understand that the majority sees major as happy, and minor as sad. I'm just saying that it's not universally true, thus not true at all.
@Merioc2k3 and i am just saying that it is universally true. and if we're all idiots, then einstein was an idiot, stephen hawking is an idiot, newton was an idiot - pahaha fuck off
@chrispudneyblitz IT'S NOT UNIVERSALLY TRUE. It obviously isn't, I myself disprove that, since certain songs that make me happy are in minor keys. And yes, we're all fucking idiots. Especially you, with your "oh I'm so smart because my grades are good" attitude.
And of course, your opinion is an axiom and not questionable. It applies to every human being that has ever heard or imagined any sorts of sounds. Because music is not something free, but something that you dictate. Music has very strict rules regarding what you must think of certain things that must not be broken.
If I rephrase everything you've said into that, do you realize your own stupidity? Seriously, you're fucking retarded.
@Merioc2k3 and you're not? you basically says that a message cant be put across through music? music should not be dictated; i have never ever said that - it goes against everything i believe in - but there are known facts such as major and minor and the emotions they instill. seriously though, im getting a little tired of this argument, as i can see (along with the other two people on here who think you're completely wrong) that you are stubborn as fuck. can we at least agree to disagree?
@chrispudneyblitz That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that it can, but only in the lyrics. What I'm saying is that it is not a FACT that major keys instill certain emotions, and minor keys instill others. You seem to disagree, which makes you an ignorant, close-minded retard. To generalize 7.1 billion people to such a point that you believe that they all will feel exactly the same thing when they hear a certain thing is beyond retarded.
@Merioc2k3 actually its more like 6.8 people, but thats irrelevant xD and you're the 'close-minded retard' cos you think that a musician cannot convey an emotion through an instrumental piece. open your ears and listen to what the music is saying ffs!
@chrispudneyblitz Last time I checked - which was yesterday, on some sort of computer that calculates the entire population of the world - it was 7.1 BILLIONS, not 6.8 people.
I've always talked about feeling from the listener's point of view, I hope you realize this...What I'm saying is that it varies from every fucking person, which you don't seem to realize. What I'm saying is pretty much obvious for everyone with half a brain. Feeling is not necessarily there.
@Merioc2k3 i missed out the word 'billion' ok. its 6.8 billion, check again... the amount of people on earth has never exceeded 7 billion.
and feeling is ALWAYS there. whether the music is played to put you in a good mood, or the musician wanted to express a feeling they had at one moment, that feeling stays there. you are just too dumb to see how the music is affecting your sunconscious
@chrispudneyblitz My point remains the same, you're a pretentious dumbass.
And no, it's not. Again with the assumptions. Seriously, it's getting pathetic and you're running out of arguments, and by now, what you're saying makes little to no sense, and you don't even argue for what you're saying. You're just stating things, the same things, over and over again, without actually listening to what I'm saying. You're just fucking dumb, and I see no point in discussing this any further with you.
@Merioc2k3 haha i tried to end this like a man a while ago but you had to fucking carry on didnt you. you have never changed your point throughout all of this. really, dont you think you're the pathetic one for making it into an argument in the first place. i was simply stating that buckethead hes more passion than paul gilmour, which he does, and you come in calling me a retard many many many many many times. at least you've finally come up with a different insult at the start of this comment
@chrispudneyblitz Yes, I had to carry it on. I thought that maybe you weren't beyond salvation, but now I realize that you will forever be an idiot.
Whether or not I'm pathetic is really irrelevant to if you are. And no, you have no evidence that Buckethead plays more "passionately" than Paul Gilbert, even though that is irrelevant to pretty much everything. Also, during our whole argument, I have not seen one single sign of intelligence. You're a lost cause, a dumbass, and a pretentious dick.
@chrispudneyblitz not to bring up an old fight or anything but i just find it funny that you said, "at least i know how to spell realise" when in fact you don't.
@Merioc2k3 and how the fuck is it selling out to convey the emotion that you are feeling to the listener in order to enhance the musical experience??? haha
@chrispudneyblitz I didn't really mean that, I meant that the way you explained it, it seemed like you meant that "feeling" was adjusting your playing so that it sounds better to most people, instead of playing it how you want to. Which I would call "selling out".
A musician should not be hung up on what the listener wants, but should instead focus on what HE wants his music to be.
@Merioc2k3 2:02 That sweep demostrates why Vai is better then Buckethead. Right there. It's unmelodic, it's dischord and it's not enjoyable to listen too...
@woodsterix That's your opinion. Also, that does not prove ANYTHING AT ALL. Buckethead is still a much more technical player. I suggest you actually study his technique. His sweep-taps are just insane. Much more complicated than anything Vai has ever done...
I was typing this in and as a suggestion, it came up with "Ballad of a dead soulja", so I figured, why not, I'll check it out. I made it to :37 before I type this back in and went to it. Honestly... wth...
I love the lyrics and that baseline + the guitar riff, it's fucking evil. I believe these two artist and band have some kind of agreement with the devil, cause daaamn.. It's incredible
may not have noticed but the minute between 2:21 and 2:25 is buckethead without the mask for a second and stands half his face when playing and there are pictures of the turning is seen 2 times without mask
@n00biewitad00bie I was simply complimenting the music and those who listen to it. Thanks for the hate though. You must have something wrong with you calling someone you don't even know a derogatory name. Grow up, keep your mouth shut, and your comments to yourself.
wow that sucked
dereksloane 2 weeks ago
@dereksloane nigger
TheBlakeWilliamson 1 week ago in playlist Liked videos
Les Claypool <3
oh and buckethead too I guess
andyofcomixinc 1 month ago
This is probably bucketheads most difficult solo...Fucking INSANE
TheWhocares233 3 months ago
lolprimus
ListedProduction 4 months ago
Buckethead would be o so happy to know ppl are bitching on hear more then enjoying a fucking kick ass song les should hit you with his baseball bat
TokeMcBudz 5 months ago
BUCKETHEAD-33
raisins101 5 months ago
I bet this "Brian Carrol" doesn't exist, it's really Les Claypool and Paul Gilbert taking turns being Buckethead.
Merioc2k3 6 months ago
@Merioc2k3 paul gilbert cant play half as passionately as buckethead
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz As irrelevant as that was, I beg to differ. How can you even tell? You can't see Buckethead's facial expressions, who knows how "passionately" he plays? Paul Gilbert always makes epic faces and seems really happy when he plays, so he does play very "passionately" - even though this has nothing to do with skill. So why the fuck did you even bring it up?
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 you obviously aren't a guitarist xD passionate guitar playing is to do with feel... listen to padmasana and then tell me you don't know buckethead is passionate. and paul gilbert is just fast - he has absolutely no feel. buckethead is the ultimate master of guitar
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz I play guitar for at least 5 hours a day. Yes, I'm a guitarist.
I love both Buckethead and Paul Gilbert, and the argument about "feeling" is at the very least retarded. Feeling in music does not lie in the finger of the player, but in the ear of the listener, and is thus an invalid argument.
Paul Gilbert is not just fast, you've just proven how little you know about him.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz I'd also like to add that your assumption that I'm not a guitarist just because I don't agree with your somewhat idiotic opinion is just insulting.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 feeling lies in how hard you pick, how much vibrato you use, which phrases you choose. listen to guitarists like david gilmour, who is in my opinion, the best guitarist for feeling in the world. the feeling that the listener gets is a different type of feeling: an emotion that is caused by the how the guitarist and other musicians play the music. and if you can give me a song by paul 'i wank over myself' gilbert that contains such feeling, i will happily apologise for that statement
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz That is...RETARDED. Those are all TECHNIQUES. How you combine them makes you an unique guitarist, the reason why you'll never hear Paul Gilbert play like David Gilmour is because THEY'RE DIFFERENT TYPES OF GUITARISTS.
Feeling is not in vibrato, in phrasing or how hard you pick. However, these techniques can be pleasing to a persons ear.
What about people who don't like David Gilmour or guitarists with good phrasing and vibrato? Are they sociopaths?
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 i can see now that you are a lost cause :/ yes they are techniques, but they are FEELING techniques. a good guitarist, eg. buckethead and gilmour, like i said can combine speed and feeling. gilbert cannot, and the simple fact that you can't even tell me a paul gilbert song with feeling proves this point.
PS: look up sociopath in the dictionary mate xD
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz Lost cause? Bwahahahahahaha. "Feeling techniques", the very name of it is laughable. No, the feeling lies in the ear of the listener, no matter what you say. The whole argument of saying that someone is better simply because they have more "feeling" is (most of the time) a way of justifying the fact that you like a crappy guitarist.
Though, here it is different. You're using it to justify your hate towards Paul Gilbert. Why do you hate him so much?
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz Oh, and if you want such a song by Paul Gilbert, listen to "I still have that other girl". It's slow, but still good and lives up to your criteria to what "feeling" is (even though it's complete bullshit).
If you think he can't combine feeling and speed, then you're wrong as fuck there, too. He has some of the best phrasing of all shredders, he plays extremely clean, he has excellent vibrato and his picking technique is godly. Why do you hate him?
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 yes, lost cause. what is laughable my stupid friend is your stubbornness and arrogance. what you have repeatedly indicated is that whatever music plays, the listener can still produce the same emotion, meaning that the ballad of the buckethead can make someone feel the same as, for example, for mom by the same guitarist. this is called 'BULLSHIT' xD i dont hate gilbert, and after listening to i still have that other girl, i now realise that he can play with feel, so i apologise
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz Of course I'm stubborn and arrogant. You know why? Because I'm right!
Yes, the ballad of Buckethead can make someone feel just the way someone else feels when they hear For Mom. As can any other song, for that matter. BECAUSE IT'S IN THE EAR OF THE LISTENER, NOT THE FINGER/VOICE/HANDS/WHATEVER OF THE MUSICIAN!
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 mate, just think whatever you want, but you are wrong. different things make you feel different emotions. if what you're saying is true, then that could extend to other things outside of music. maybe you would laugh at your mother's funeral?
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz The first thing is true, but that only applies to the individual. You really think that everyone would react exactly the same way to the same thing? No, everyone would react differently.
Ye,s it DOES extend to things outside of music. And yes, I do believe there are some people who would laugh at their mother's funeral.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 thank god, you're finally showing some sense haha! no, i don't expect everyone to react EXACTLY the same way, but then again, i also don't expect them to react completely oppositely
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz People are different. While you may not feel the way you do when you hear Soothsayer as you do when you hear "Bad Romance", there's people who do. Which means that "feeling" should not be a criteria for judging if a guitarist is good or not, because that depends on the listener.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 whatever dude. you're not even talking about the same thing anymore, so just... whatever
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz What? Yes I am, I'm talking about how feeling is in the ear of the listener, which I've repeated throughout all of my comments. I'm guessing you're just realizing you're wrong and you feel like backing out of this conversation before you have to admit it.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 unlike you, i don't need to repeat the same fucking sentence four times!! xD what i have been getting at however throughout all of this conversation is the that is A DIFFERENT SORT OF FEEEEEEEEEEEEELINGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you cant seem to get that into your thick skull xD
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz I wouldn't have had to repeat myself if you'd just get it the first time.
What do you mean "Different sort of feeling"? That there's feeling in both the actual playing, other than that which the listener projects upon the music? If so, there probably is, since the musician most likely has some sort of emotional attachment to the song. However, this is irrelevant to whether or not the song is appealing to the listener, and thus irrelevant completely to this conversation.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 Both Of You get over it. Buckethead Sucks anyway. Go listen to Some Vai or some Pink Floyd...
woodsterix 5 months ago
@woodsterix Nobody gives a shit about your opinion, and as far as it comes to technical ability, Buckethead eats Steve Vai for breakfast. You can't possibly deny that. The rest is just a matter of taste, and trying to force your personal preferences down my throat makes you a fucking retard.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 Vai eats Buckethead for breakfast? and what measurement do you have for this good sir? You opinion. By the way, music can create emotions you fucking retard.
woodsterix 5 months ago
@woodsterix I said the opposite, Buckethead eats Vai for breakfast.
Well, first of all, they're both amazing guitarist, but Buckethead has cleaner and more complicated sweeps, is better at tapping, playing staccato, playing legato, string skipping and pretty much everything else.
I never said that music can't create emotions. You should actually read what I said before you answer me, retard.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 You find me a single lick that steve has played unclean, a single run that buckethead has done better. You're so wrong... Sorry. Steve understands that you should play melodically too... :O
woodsterix 5 months ago
@woodsterix They don't play the same licks. Also, I know that Steve plays very clean, but what I'm saying is that Buckethead plays way more complex things and he does it perfectly clean.
Buckethead plays very melodic things. Just search for "Acoustic shards" and listen to pretty much whatever pops up by Buckethead, or listen to "Soothsayer".
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 Three words. Freak Show Excess. and just to add to that all the stuff he did with Zappa.
woodsterix 5 months ago
@woodsterix dude go listen to 'for mom' by buckethead... you seem to think he just shreds but he does some beautiful melodic stuff as well. 'padmasana' and 'soothsayer' are also really good ;)
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz I'm sorry, I just don't like him. Although For Mom is a lovely song :) But it doesn't excuse the rest of his works :(
woodsterix 5 months ago
@woodsterix fair enough, everyone to their own opinion i suppose... but you cant say that hes not an astounding guitarist
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz True, True. Just not melodic enough for me. Although he can be when he tries as you've shown.
woodsterix 5 months ago
@woodsterix vai=ok, pink floyd=amazing, buckethead=also amazing in a different way - if you dont like buckethead why the fuck are you watching one of his videos?? xD
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz BECAUSE I COMMENT ON FACEBOOK PUDNEY! :O I WANTED TO SEE A CRAP ARGUEMENT! But Vai is amazing, you just have to listen to the right stuff he does tracks for people wanting shred and then theres the good stuff.
woodsterix 5 months ago
@woodsterix haha i didnt realise it was you woody! but buckethead is still awesome
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 dude, you clearly have no understanding of guitar beyond the appeal of a high-gain setup and fast-playing, go plug the £2,000 Flying V you barely know how to play into your 100w amp, leave the distortion at 10 where it's always been and play smoke on the water for a bit, blow off some steam :')
7752 5 months ago
@7752 Hahahaha, what a fucking outrageously insulting assumption. I don't play a Flying V, first of all, and I have a 15W amp. The distortion might be at 10, but that's because I grew up to the sound of heavily distorted guitars.
Also, I don't play fast. I prefer bluesy rock in the style of Jimmy Page and such.
By the way, what leads you to the assumption that I have no understanding of music? Just curious.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 "By the way, what leads you to the assumption that I have no understanding of music? Just curious." You like buckethead... Enough said. You Buckethead lost in an audition for the red hot chili peppers to DAVE NAVARRO. are you kidding me...
woodsterix 5 months ago
@woodsterix Irrelevant, he's an amazingly brilliant musician. They said that they didn't choose him because they wanted a guitarist who could also "kick a groove". I'm pretty sure they knew he'd outstage them all, too.
The fact that you even used that as an argument proves what a fucking retard you are.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 this is hilarious, you clearly don't understand wit. and if you knew a reasonable amount about music (enough to warrant having such a strong opinion you think you can win an argument against 3 people on youtube), you'd have an understanding of feel when playing guitar which would've saved you the embarrassment of getting into this hollow argument in the first place :')
7752 5 months ago
@7752 Hahaha. If you were sarcastic or anything, just know that stuff like that usually go unnoticed in text.
I'm not saying that I know everything about music, but I know enough to judge that Buckethead is superior to Vai when it comes to technical skill. The fact that there are 3 people arguing against me proves NOTHING, you do realize that, right?
"Understanding of feel"? I've just explained exactly everything regarding my opinion on this, be more specific and tell me what you disagree with.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 sarcasm goes unnoticed in text, wit doesn't. your arguements are beyond unjustified, I could start pointing out how you can make a drumkit sound more like a piano than an actual piano and my argument would be more valid than anything you've said so far today.
7752 5 months ago
@7752 Wit too, if you're not expecting it.
Why are my arguments unjustified? And no, you couldn't. I'm not even quite sure which of my statement(s) you're attacking, and that makes them hard to defend. Could you specify?
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 well now you're a hypocrite as well cos you've been saying for ages how a guitarist cant put feeling into a song xD
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz What? What I said was that whatever feeling that the player might have towards the song he's playing, it doesn't shine through. And that the only "feeling" there is, FROM A LISTENERS PERSPECTIVE (I thought this was obvious, I guess not) varies from person to person.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 literally every musician in the world apart from you seems to knows that you can put feeing into music. stop calling people retards, as it seems like the only fucking insult you know and look in the mirror for a bit - you're the retard mate
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz Again you've completely looked past EVERYTHING I'VE SAID AND ARGUED FOR. You're the fucking retard. Do I have to repeat myself?
Yes, a musician can have an emotional attachment to a song. However, this does not shine through and is not in any way obvious to the listener. What the listener might "feel" when he hears that specific song is not in any way connected to what the musician felt. Have I made myself clear enough, or do I have to dumb it down even further? Retard.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 for the last fucking time, I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT AN EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT!!!!!!! feeling in music is how you play it in a way that it conveys feelings to the listener. plus, its spelt 'realise', not 'realize', dipshit xD
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz Well, what ARE you talking about? Your bullshit "feeling techniques"? Hahahahaha. "Look, I've perfected the technique of FEELING!" Pure and utter bullshit.
Judging by your other description of it, "feeling" is adapting your playing style to what people like. Selling out, much? Haha. You can't really convey feeling in such a way as you describe, SINCE EVERYONE REACTS DIFFERENT TO DIFFERENT EXPERIENCES, CAN YOU AT LEAST UNDERSTAND THAT?
Als, no, it's not. Lrn2wiktionary.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 feeling in guitar terms is a combination of techniques, yes: techniques, that convey emotion in a persons playing. i am not talking about human feeling, which is different, not completely different, as you need human feeling to be able to play the guitar with feeling, but still different. ask any guitarist, they'll tell you the same
also, yes it is unless you're american, which you're not. you're swedish according to your profile, therefore you use the English spelling: realise
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz You can't convey emotion in your playing. You just can't. As I said, what the player feels and what the listener feels are two completely different things, and therefore, the feeling is not conveyed. Do you understand?
The rest is just retarded. I'm a guitarist, and I beg to differ, so that's not true. And I know plenty of people who would agree with me.
Also, you have no right at all to dictate what English dialect I use. Asswipe.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 of course you fucking can! ill use baby terms cos thats obviously all you can understand: once upon a time, there was a man called eric clapton and one day his son went to live up in the sky. he was very sad so he decided to write a song called 'tears in heaven'. when everyone heard his song, they were all sad as well. his emotion was and is the same as the listener, even if the listener doesnt know the story behind the song
and yes i can, because you're swedish, not american
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz Hahaha, you're retarded. I've heard the song "Tears in Heaven", and there's a difference when it comes to songs that actually have lyrics. Lyrics are interpretable in a way that songs without lyrics aren't.
Also, it doesn't mean shit if I'm Swedish, American or a fucking penguin for that matter. You have no right at all to dictate such things. Retard.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 haha there you go with the 'retard' insult again xD and even without lyrics, emotion in music stretches back to lesson 1: major or minor, ie happy or sad [ :) or :( ] listen to air by bach and tell me which emotion you feel
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz ...
Are you serious? So you're saying that it is IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to think any different than that major = happy and minor = sad? That's purely retarded.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 erm yes, yes i am xD thats kind of fundamental in music haha! and pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease find a new insult, at least just for one or two comments?
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz Hahahahaha, you're dumber than I thought. For an example, whenever I listen to Niccolo Paganini's 24th Caprice in A MINOR I get happy. So no, it's not true. It's true that it is commonly believed that songs in a major key are happy and songs in a minor key are sad, but it's not true. There are SEVERAL exceptions, and I've already named one. And if it's not universally true, it's not true at all.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
Oh, and I don't need a new insult. If the shoe fits...
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 thats because pagaini modulates to major keys - its only called caprice 24 in A minor because it starts in A minor. it actually starts to modulate during the first phrase
and the shoe doesn't fit actually. i got like the best results in the whole year, and got an A in music. i also have a merit in music theory grade 5, so please dont start to argue with me about the theoretical side of it (keys etc) because in all fairness, you will lose
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz Be that as it may, it is not the only exception.
And you really think that grades are a merit for measuring one's intelligence? That's purely retarded.
Also, this has NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER been about the theoretical side of music. It's about how people reacts to music, and that there is no rules to how people should feel when they listen to music that's in a certain key and stuff like that, as you seem to think.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 grades and results prove that i know shit, so yes i do think that
and i know, i was just warning you in advance
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz LOL. That's just sad...From what I've understood it, intelligence usually has a negative effect on your grades due to the fact that "Cogito, ergo doleo" is more or less a fact for most intelligent people, and depression would kind of kill your will to study or perform good in school.
But, how can you seriously believe that EVERYONE feels sad when they hear a song in a minor key, and happy when they hear a song in a major key? It's just...Dumb. So very, very fucking dumb.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 that is utter bollocks! im very intelligent - i always have been - and i am in no way depressed.
and your argument is pretty much exactly what composers were thinking in the 20th century when they created experimental discordant orchestral 'music'. it didnt work btw, which is why minimalism took over pretty quickly and moved music back into the concept of major and minor, happy and sad
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz I'm sorry, I started laughing when I read that "I'm very intelligent - I always have been".
You may THINK you're intelligent, but you're not. The human race consists of only idiots. We're all idiots. Haha.
I don't really see how you can use that as an example. I understand that the majority sees major as happy, and minor as sad. I'm just saying that it's not universally true, thus not true at all.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 and i am just saying that it is universally true. and if we're all idiots, then einstein was an idiot, stephen hawking is an idiot, newton was an idiot - pahaha fuck off
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz IT'S NOT UNIVERSALLY TRUE. It obviously isn't, I myself disprove that, since certain songs that make me happy are in minor keys. And yes, we're all fucking idiots. Especially you, with your "oh I'm so smart because my grades are good" attitude.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 it really is. trust me, songs or pieces of music in minor keys only sound happy if they modulate
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz ...
And of course, your opinion is an axiom and not questionable. It applies to every human being that has ever heard or imagined any sorts of sounds. Because music is not something free, but something that you dictate. Music has very strict rules regarding what you must think of certain things that must not be broken.
If I rephrase everything you've said into that, do you realize your own stupidity? Seriously, you're fucking retarded.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 and you're not? you basically says that a message cant be put across through music? music should not be dictated; i have never ever said that - it goes against everything i believe in - but there are known facts such as major and minor and the emotions they instill. seriously though, im getting a little tired of this argument, as i can see (along with the other two people on here who think you're completely wrong) that you are stubborn as fuck. can we at least agree to disagree?
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that it can, but only in the lyrics. What I'm saying is that it is not a FACT that major keys instill certain emotions, and minor keys instill others. You seem to disagree, which makes you an ignorant, close-minded retard. To generalize 7.1 billion people to such a point that you believe that they all will feel exactly the same thing when they hear a certain thing is beyond retarded.
We can't agree to disagree, cause you're WRONG.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 actually its more like 6.8 people, but thats irrelevant xD and you're the 'close-minded retard' cos you think that a musician cannot convey an emotion through an instrumental piece. open your ears and listen to what the music is saying ffs!
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz Last time I checked - which was yesterday, on some sort of computer that calculates the entire population of the world - it was 7.1 BILLIONS, not 6.8 people.
I've always talked about feeling from the listener's point of view, I hope you realize this...What I'm saying is that it varies from every fucking person, which you don't seem to realize. What I'm saying is pretty much obvious for everyone with half a brain. Feeling is not necessarily there.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 i missed out the word 'billion' ok. its 6.8 billion, check again... the amount of people on earth has never exceeded 7 billion.
and feeling is ALWAYS there. whether the music is played to put you in a good mood, or the musician wanted to express a feeling they had at one moment, that feeling stays there. you are just too dumb to see how the music is affecting your sunconscious
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz My point remains the same, you're a pretentious dumbass.
And no, it's not. Again with the assumptions. Seriously, it's getting pathetic and you're running out of arguments, and by now, what you're saying makes little to no sense, and you don't even argue for what you're saying. You're just stating things, the same things, over and over again, without actually listening to what I'm saying. You're just fucking dumb, and I see no point in discussing this any further with you.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 haha i tried to end this like a man a while ago but you had to fucking carry on didnt you. you have never changed your point throughout all of this. really, dont you think you're the pathetic one for making it into an argument in the first place. i was simply stating that buckethead hes more passion than paul gilmour, which he does, and you come in calling me a retard many many many many many times. at least you've finally come up with a different insult at the start of this comment
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz Yes, I had to carry it on. I thought that maybe you weren't beyond salvation, but now I realize that you will forever be an idiot.
Whether or not I'm pathetic is really irrelevant to if you are. And no, you have no evidence that Buckethead plays more "passionately" than Paul Gilbert, even though that is irrelevant to pretty much everything. Also, during our whole argument, I have not seen one single sign of intelligence. You're a lost cause, a dumbass, and a pretentious dick.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 at least i know how to spell realise and that there is less than 7 billion people in the world
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz If I wanted my comeback, I would've wiped off your mom's chin.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 oh mum jokes are so original aren't they? my god, you're funny hahahahahahahaha
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz I agree with Merioc2K3 you dick!
MrPunkPadge 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz not to bring up an old fight or anything but i just find it funny that you said, "at least i know how to spell realise" when in fact you don't.
WillyWonkaIsSatanic 1 month ago
@WillyWonkaIsSatanic i live in the UK mate, over here we tend to spell it 'realise'
chrispudneyblitz 1 month ago
@chrispudneyblitz ahh, well thats cool then. learned something new, have fun.
WillyWonkaIsSatanic 1 month ago
@Merioc2k3 and how the fuck is it selling out to convey the emotion that you are feeling to the listener in order to enhance the musical experience??? haha
chrispudneyblitz 5 months ago
@chrispudneyblitz I didn't really mean that, I meant that the way you explained it, it seemed like you meant that "feeling" was adjusting your playing so that it sounds better to most people, instead of playing it how you want to. Which I would call "selling out".
A musician should not be hung up on what the listener wants, but should instead focus on what HE wants his music to be.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
@Merioc2k3 2:02 That sweep demostrates why Vai is better then Buckethead. Right there. It's unmelodic, it's dischord and it's not enjoyable to listen too...
woodsterix 5 months ago
@woodsterix That's your opinion. Also, that does not prove ANYTHING AT ALL. Buckethead is still a much more technical player. I suggest you actually study his technique. His sweep-taps are just insane. Much more complicated than anything Vai has ever done...
Not to mention, his nubbing is awesome.
Merioc2k3 5 months ago
so catchy
funkeymonkey1200 7 months ago
Zappa would of Loved both of these guys
AdobePhsyko 8 months ago
I aint got no boy........SLINGBLADE kicks ass!!!!
DustinAndNatasha 10 months ago
"I ain't got no boy..."
Kater2 10 months ago
28 DISLIKES!? FUCK YOU PEOPLE
Max40997 11 months ago 12
@Max40997 they are "believers"
SlashsBluesBall 3 months ago
You almost don't believe this is made by human beings.
M3t4lManiac 1 year ago
@M3t4lManiac I wasn't. Bucky, a human being? Hardly.
swordcollection 8 months ago
I was typing this in and as a suggestion, it came up with "Ballad of a dead soulja", so I figured, why not, I'll check it out. I made it to :37 before I type this back in and went to it. Honestly... wth...
Realizationification 1 year ago
This video used to scare me till i peed
7Vooby 1 year ago 8
very sick i love it
batusai005 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Folks just call him BUCKETHEAD - Epic
thebehmont1 1 year ago
he must have listened to alot of eddie van halen growing up
iraceforfood 1 year ago
@iraceforfood
lol you don't amount to this by listening to Eddie Van Halen
Kater2 10 months ago
Comment removed
worldwideteddy 1 year ago
YOU MUST BECOME ONE WITH THE CHICKEN.
McFro95 1 year ago
Buckethead+claypool..
claypools rhymes in this song are pretty awesome too
DrPoon 1 year ago
whos this guitar playing sonsoffabitch is a question common asked , on his head a bucket of chickenbones, on his face a plastic mask!
4lp4z3ro 1 year ago
Acid flash backs o.O (:
ToKoolForYou2 1 year ago
O.O.... what a life.
gabrielgamers 1 year ago
poor buckethead.... how did he fit in that tiny chicken coop anyway?
TheApollo4521 1 year ago
@TheApollo4521 Some speculate he's part robot and was able to take off some of his mechanical parts.
TehMattz 1 year ago
@TehMattz ooohhh.....
TheApollo4521 1 year ago
at the end: coming up MudVayne
happybuddyperson 1 year ago
sweet vid awsome !!!
hughjazz6033 1 year ago
I love the lyrics and that baseline + the guitar riff, it's fucking evil. I believe these two artist and band have some kind of agreement with the devil, cause daaamn.. It's incredible
M3t4lManiac 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
is like the opening theme of a show about buckethead
guillezgz3C 1 year ago
its like the opening theme of a show about buckethead
guillezgz3C 1 year ago 7
fucking awesome
RadicalHighscore 1 year ago
This is the only Buckethead song I've heard so far that has lyrics.
CinnaBonXoXpRetzEL 1 year ago
primus sucks :) x
retardedsnake 1 year ago
The dichotomy of people who listen to buckethead and those who don't...is a big crime that should be punishable.
Get yourself some good music.
Emceetem 1 year ago
Just noticed Robert Duvall's dialogue from Sling Blade in the beginning.
americanaccents 1 year ago
@americanaccents Told you I ain't got no boy.
ginghamslut 1 year ago
@KingsBurial tons do, u dont know what ur saying
SoldSeparatly 1 year ago
Sounds like the dude from Primus
AirHendrix91 1 year ago
@AirHendrix91 it is
SwaggerPwnz 1 year ago
@SwaggerPwnz Oh gotcha, sweet collab. Yeah when I looked up the lyrics the day after I watched this, it said it was by Primus so it figures.
AirHendrix91 1 year ago
@AirHendrix91 Cause it is!
overlord1138 1 year ago
@AirHendrix91 it is, Les Claypool. also the bass player
gonejibbin 1 year ago
@KingsBurial I agree with phadedlife, i love ozzy too but Les is my favorite singer of all time....plus ozzys voice wouldnt work with this.
sociopathix 1 year ago
Buckethead is the most technically proficient guitarist on earth
SidVicious10101 1 year ago
@KingsBurial I love Ozzy, but NO.
phadedlife 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
Slashe50 1 year ago
The ballad of Buckethead \m/ !!!!!
sajetsal 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
omg y dus he have to play fast all the time? he shud try an b more liek charlie from busted
b0b1919 1 year ago
@b0b1919 well you havent looked deeper in to the bucket yet. go listen to "i love my parents" for example
mikeguitar41 1 year ago 2
@b0b1919 Listen to electric tears. Most beautiful song ever.
The34zyD 1 year ago
@b0b1919 ok ummm go listen to whitewash stupid
udienowisay 1 year ago
buckethead's tall...
I knew he was tall, but not THAT TALL !
H2OHBOM 1 year ago 4
may not have noticed but the minute between 2:21 and 2:25 is buckethead without the mask for a second and stands half his face when playing and there are pictures of the turning is seen 2 times without mask
keygen5152 2 years ago
lol You're right. There went a piece of his identity. lol
GamerBoy53 1 year ago
Im still trying to figure that out :l
TomNirvana89 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm sorry... this is truly horrible.
spoonylove 2 years ago
@spoonylove
you are truly horrible, in bed.
Fluffypopcicle 1 year ago
LOL.
Brilliant!
spoonylove 1 year ago
It's just like country singing with Buckethead's rock music which is kinda like Buckethead's time in the coop,shredding his guitar.
Zynthrax 2 years ago
Les Claypool doesn't have a country voice.
zack2703 2 years ago
ya he lived in claremont
lespaulfan777 2 years ago
AWSOME !!!!!!!
hughjazz6033 2 years ago
I love the Slingblade sample. XD
friendofastranger 2 years ago
I cant seem to escape Les Claypool, no complaints there.
slatan420 2 years ago
I Live Near Where He Used To live when he was young!
lespaulfan777 2 years ago 6
where did he used to live man i heard somewhere in claremont california ur lucky to live near him man id give anything to jam with him
PuffSmelly 2 years ago
hahahaha, i love it.
its pretty much his theme song.
Arthurb06 2 years ago
buckethead and les claypool are perfect compliments to eachother. they are both insane in their respective instruments, and have similar styles.
ajfdrums447 2 years ago 35
catchy song... addicted to this... : D
moshMasochist 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
i accept all friend invites
iFriendChannel 2 years ago
Comment removed
worldwideteddy 2 years ago 53
@worldwideteddy er....i don't understand...
steve171274 1 year ago
@worldwideteddy because you understand music that most wont
n00biewitad00bie 1 year ago
@worldwideteddy ur a fag
n00biewitad00bie 1 year ago
@n00biewitad00bie I was simply complimenting the music and those who listen to it. Thanks for the hate though. You must have something wrong with you calling someone you don't even know a derogatory name. Grow up, keep your mouth shut, and your comments to yourself.
worldwideteddy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is there a buckethead greatest hits album?
MCPyroD 2 years ago
buckethead + primus = win
ragglefraggle09 2 years ago 3
bucket head is like the ultimat guitar player to me he is fuckin awsome!
darkness1991ify 2 years ago 18
wat happened to the kfc part on the bucket?
lego398 2 years ago
it had an orgasm
WSOPItaly 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he got sued for it
Butondemas 2 years ago
how?
lego398 2 years ago