Added: 4 years ago
From: BereanBeacon
Views: 23,878
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,143)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @DishrackDoofus I see your trolling me everywhere I go now. I must have really hurt your e-feelings.

  • @foxlake02 aka dingbatclaire, HAR HAR HAR HAR You are too stupid to be able to hurt anyone's feelings. If you and you sock sister odi, had just disappeared you would be having all your secret socks exposed. HAR HAR HAR HAR you are one dumb bitch Claire.

    PWNED

  • Oooh goodie, another religion vs evolution debate. See I don't go to actual religious sites and slag 'em off. But seeing as places like this throw it open for us all to rant at each other. I'd like to say, sorry folks. Religion doesn't work as well as it used to anymore. It was used to keep people in line with fear of the unknown.

  • @GoodScienceForYou "I find it funny that I posted the equation with the missing "/" and AlanCFA (certified f###ing a##hole) goes ballistic. I posted it that way so it would force him to go look it up"

    That is a blatant lie. You could not perform high school algebra. Your statement that energy accelerated = mass is also ludicrous but you will either not admit to that being wrong or you will pretend that you stated that deliberately. You are a lying idiot, not a scientist.

  • @GSFY "Actually I am working on a whole series of videos to wipe out the religion of Evodelusionism from science"

    While you are at it, do you plan to wipe out mathematics?

    You wrote: Time^2 =( Energy Distance^2)/Mass (From Einstein's theory)

    and then simplified that to: C = Time^2 Distance^2

    So you think that you can take the speed of light from relativity written as c^2 = d^2 / t^2 and take the square root of both sides by dropping the LHS exponent and writing the RHS as multiplication?

  • @GSFY "This math is from a physicist's article" No it isn't You cited the mass-energy article in Wikipedia and no such equation appears. It shows: E = m'('distance'2/'time'2)'; hence the term "mass–energy equivalence"

    and THAT CANNOT be algebraically manipulated to c =time^2 * distance^2

    The part inside the parentheses is equiv to c^2, so they actually show c^2 = (dist'2/'time'2)

    Show me a physicist who thinks that is c =time^2 * dist^2

    You don't know high school algebra you MORON!

  • @GoodScienceForYou "8/ Never inflict your beliefs on others as absolute truth, until you have that absolute evidence. Always say that this is your concept that you are testing if that is the case."

    That is how ALL scientific theories work. The theory of electricity, the theory of evolution, the theory of gravity, etc. Maybe you should listen to your own words - this time they make sense.

    p.s. evolution is both a fact and a theory and you are an idiot

  • @GSFY "You are an Evotard, who thinks that theory is your Evodelusional "Gospel". It is your religion" It makes it easier for you to think that the TOE is a religion, but it is not. If the term "evotard" means those that understand high school algebra, count me in and you out. You botched simple algebra calculations, blamed it on the article you read, and took no responsibility for your failure to do math the average 14-year old can handle; all in an attempt to prove another stupid idea

  • It's simple. Loads of religions have to be wrong according to each religion. Scientists can accept they could be wrong. But most religious people don't want to feel like they're part of the wrong team. Besides a lot of religious leaders don't believe in religion either. They just use it to make lots of people behave the way they want them to.

  • Ah, your video quit working.

  • @srexob715 - congratulations on getting banned from GSFY's forum! I love the way he edits/deletes posts that make him look foolish, and yet even the ones left highlight his ignorance and this clown doesn't even see it!! These gems of his tell us all we need to know about his scientific knowledge -

    - Diamond are no longer carbon, they are diamonds

    - Photosynthesis is a carbon digesting process

    - The cause of sickle cell anemia is unknown, dumb ass

    Makes even Nephi look bright in comparison!!!

  • @GoodScienceForYou - it's a load of laughs to watch you come to YT, begging for people to come to your forum to be insulted and deluged by religious nonsense masquerading as science.

  • @GoodScienceForYou - you are full of crap. It is you who know nothing about science of any kind. You claim to have more math skills than me, but will not even attempt to answer a simple, conceptual calculus problem. That is because you have no idea of how to answer it - you do not know math, you simply have a huge ego and like to pretend that you do.

    Your statement about a fish "wanting" to grow legs shows that you have zero idea what the theory of evolution actually teaches.

  • @GoodScienceForYou: "You think that calculus has anything to do with Evolution?"

    You are INCREDIBLY stupid. I pointed out that random can mean phenomena that can be described by a random distribution. Then YOU claimed that you had taken many more math classes than me. So I asked you to explain a simple conceptual concept from calculus. You could not do so. Why? Because you lied about knowing math! You created a falsehood to boost your ego and LIED THROUGH YOUR TEETH!

  • @AlanCFA OMG, he is still going on about random??? I completely explained this to him in his FAKE forum and then he banned me.

    TYPICAL coward!

  • @srexob715 - yes, more of his ego stroking nonsense. He claimed there was no random and I pointed out that in math the term means processes that are described by a random distribution. He then tells me that I am an idiot and that he has taken many more math classes than me (would he know?)

    So I ask him about the relationship between the height of a cutting plane and the base when integrating to calculate the volume of a tetrahedron. He never answers because he has no clue. He's a lying jerk

  • @srexob715

    ps-I am not surprise that he banned you. He also recently threatened KrokrX saying that he had KrokrX's ISP info from months ago when he posted on the FAKE forum. He wonders why nobody wants to go there!

    Yes, he wants to bash people but when they do not cower, he bans them. Or he tells them "you don't know when you're being set up". Or, just recently, he blasts me as a stalker then says that I am a pawn of his being manipulated to post and keep his visibility up. What delusions

  • @AlanCFA - you're right, he's called me everything from simple-minded playground insults through, 'forum Nazi', various forms of sex pervert, a 'god hater' through to the surreal 'god damned Islamic fascist', and he's even threatened to send material to my employer, but his feeble bullying will get him nowhere. He's an ill-educated sad little man and all his bluster won't change anything. He needs to seek professional help for his inherited mental problems and take the medications offered.

  • @GoodScienceForYou: "There is no impetus for fish to leave water. IF that was the case we would have millions of fish trying to do it now". Once again, you PROVE that you have NEVER studied evolution. There is NOTHING in the theory about ANY organism WANTING to change. Do you understand that? I'll answer it for you - NO! You have ZERO understanding of the theory. If you had read ANY scientific paper you would not make such a claim but you have not. You are a LYING idiot!

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    Why yes, calculus does have something to do with evolution. The main thing calculus is used for is CALCULATING RATES OF CHANGE and SUMMING CONTINUOUS RATES. Calculus is also relevant for statistical analysis, wherein results are compared to see if there is a strong correlation between events, or if events can be expected to happen within a certain number of attempts, and what frequency they should happen at.

    There is impetus for fish to leave water. Water dries up, mudskipper.

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    Using the mudskipper is an excellent example. The mudskipper is a fish, a perciform goby that is capable of amphibious movement across land to evade threats and seek new territory, which is exactly the kind of impetus you claimed did not exist.

    You'll have to define what you in particular mean by "present form". If you think I can pick up a single fish from the population and ask how long its ancestors were exactly like it, the answer is never.

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    I'm sorry, I may be misunderstanding you.

    Are you asking "Where is my evidence that the mudskipper is a perciform goby that is capable of amphibious movement across land to evade threats and seek new territory?"

  • @GoodScienceForYou try giving US evidence for God.

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    Adaptation isn't evolution?

    What do you think evolution is, pray tell?

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    Have I read "The Neutral Evolution Forum" with 2309 Posts within 102 Topics, created and moderated by you? No. I can't say I have. I don't agree to participate in a debate with you as moderator, or give your site the traffic.

  • @BadReligionFromYou

    I'm sorry that you feel your ideas are incapable of withstanding the light of public scrutiny and have to hide in a self-moderated forum to reinforce your views. The purpose of choosing a moderator is to ensure civility and the rules of logic. That you have insulted me in nearly every post isn't a rousing commendation in your favor on the matter. I choose YouTube as my forum, and I responded to a statement you also made on this forum. I have no onus to be sidetracked by you.

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    An excellent rebuttal. That single smashing ad hominem attack has completely overshadowed your previous failures.

  • @GoodScienceForYou "Go fuck yourself. You weak suck coward. "

    One of the more intelligent things that you have posted here. You still expanding your successful spa business into other countries?

  • @GoodScienceForYou "The site gets lots of traffic already. "

    Yeah, it's a sprawling metropolis and not a ghost town. BWAHAHAHAHA!!!

    Your forum is nearly abandoned and that is why you hang out here, constantly pimping a place where you have control and can block and censor people and get their ISP info. Your forum is a failure, just like your life. Karma and all that.

  • @AlanCFA - you've got to admit that GSFY is an impressive failure - failed high-school, failed husband(3 times), failed salesman, failed businessman, failed astrologer, failed guru, failed embezzler, failed forum host .... did I miss anything of note off his spectacular list of failures?

  • @KrokrX - when even NephilimFree blocks him, he is a failed "Creationist Scientist" (which is an oxymoron to begin with).

  • @GoodScienceForYou "Never believe anyone, of any stature"

    We do not believe you.

    "Never believe a teacher with an agenda...or to insure their egos and pride "

    That describes you pretty well except that you are not a teacher. Your EGO is so HUGE that when you were shown to be WRONG about fused chromosome #2, you LIED and pretended that you always knew it was fused when you said clearly that it was NEVER fused. You are a fraud with an enormous ego. Get some medication to control your delusions

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    You're not patient at all. I have explained calmly to you that calculus is useful in evolution, as it is in nearly any science, and that there is impetus for fish to leave water, and gave an example of a fish that leaves water due to that impetus. You have questioned my sanity and called me a delusional dumbass.

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    Oh, well if that's your idea of evolution, then yeah. That doesn't happen.

    Evolution is change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.

    [Random House Dictionary 2010.]

    Mudskippers breathe air.

    ["Burrow air phase maintenance and respiration by the mudskipper Scartelaos histophorus (Gobiidae: Oxudercinae)", Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 169-177 (2005)]

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    Those creatures would be the Vertebrates.

  • Crocodiles are roughly 200 million years old.

    [Grigg, Gordon and Gans, Carl (1993) Morphology And Physiology Of The Crocodylia, in Fauna of Australia Vol 2A Amphibia and Reptilia, chapter 40, pages 326-336. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.]

    Crocodiles have evolved into many different species in that time.

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    If a crocodile turned into a human, evolution would be disproved. You're right, there's no evidence of that.

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    Okay.

    ["Extended mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses yield new insight into crocodylian evolution and their survival of the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary." Roos J, Aggarwal RK, Janke A. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Nov;45(2):663-73. Epub 2007 Jul 12.]

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    Good news that we have the DNA to back up that belief then. Or did you think "Extended mitogenomic phylogenetic analysis" was a buzzword?

  • @GoodScienceForYou "You don't understand what irrefutable means..Do you? If there is any other plausible way to answer the question, then it is refuted"

    That is nonsense. First of all, NO branch of science works that way. Second, irrefutable does not mean that there might be another, plausible explanation. Thirdly, if you could refute one of the basic premises of evolution, you would FALSIFY it - something that YOU claim is nonsense.

    You are an idiot that knows nothing about science.

  • @GoodScienceForYou "There is no evidence of any crock becoming human or anything else." The fact that you think there should be shows that you do NOT understand the Theory of Evolution and that you have NEVER read 21,000+ scientific papers on that subject or ANY subject.

    You are uninformed and basing your nonsense on warmed-over Jehovah's Witnesses garbage. You are not fooling anyone, you moron.

    Go mate a gorilla and a chimp and see if you get an orangutan.

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    /watch?v=IBHEsEshhLs

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    If you're not a creationist, then you shouldn't be using their playbook.

  • @rkyeun - GSFY says 'I never argue Creationism against Evodelusionism' yet his last 5 video uploads to his channel were standard creationist propaganda pieces. Funny how GSFY claims to want religion out of science but chose videos starring the Moonie evangelist Dr. Wells!!

  • @GoodScienceForYou "I never argue Creationism against Evodelusionism"

    BS. ALL of your arguments are Creationist arguments with the exception of humans mating with gorillas; even Creationists are not that stupid

    "Creationism is a religious idea and both are NOT SCIENCE" Correct, but it IS you belief system. You ARE a Creationist and your arguments ARE Creationist arguments - you are NOT a scientist

    If gorillas and chimps mated to produce orangutans, then try mating them and see what you get

  • @GoodScienceForYou ''Evodelusionism is a faith based bullshit religion''

    That's a good one, numb nuts.

  • @GoodScienceForYou "There is NO EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION!"

    Yes there is and your religious-based denials of the evidence do not change that. You had NO idea that there was evidence supporting the fusion of human chromosome #2 when you made that video and EMPHATICALLY said that the fusion NEVER took place. You found out that you were WRONG and, because you are a lying egomaniac, never admitted it but instead invented your gorilla-human mating hypothesis.

    You are an idiot and a liar.

  • @rkyeun - I noticed that GSFY claimed again that crocodiles have been around for over 100million years, leaving aside his error, he's previously claimed that radiometric dating(or as he prefers 'radiation dating') is nonsense, so how can he know that crocodiles have been around so long? He continually claims not to believe anything that's not 100% proven so how did he date those crocs? Consistency just isn't Jimmy's forte!!

  • @KrokrX

    I'm not gonna fuss too much about mistaking 200 million for 100 million years. As far as I'm concerned it's close enough to the same ballpark for these purposes. The idea is that the things are really old. They fill their niche expertly and because their niche hasn't changed much, the selective pressure is for them to remain mostly the same physically and instead grow more efficient.

  • @rkyeun - I totally agree, but of course GSFY doesn't want to understand, and is probably incapable of doing so. GSFY is quite probably the dumbest user on YT, eclipsing even NephilimFree - he tried to 'teach' Nephi some of his 'science' and Nephi blocked him, it was too out there even for him!! It's quite sad that he prefers foul-mouthed insults to coherent arguments, but he can only use what he's got!

  • @GoodScienceForYou "We have nearly 90% of the fossils of the non bird vertebrates that are now living."

    Another claim for which you provide zero evidence. This is derived from a statement that we have representatives of those lines, but you are too stupid to understand that. Typical Creationist idiot.

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    Mudskippers respire via cutaneous breathing. Just like amphibians, they breathe air through the moisture of their skin, which works analogously to the wet tissue inside your lungs. Obviously, this method of gas exchange only works when wet. They're just like frogs in that regard: Neither likes being made into jerky.

    [Graham, J. B. (ed.), ed (1997). Air–breathing Fishes. Evolution, Diversity and Adaptation. San Diego California: Academic Press.]

  • @GoodScienceForYou "ake a muskipper to Colorado and see how long it breathes"

    Yeah, that is related to the evolutionary pressure that you deny. The environment changes and creatures whose mutated DNA gives them a survival advantage adapt.

  • @GoodScienceForYou "Mathematics, particularly using statistics, and probability are against evolution". You do not know anything about either. You claim to know more about it than me, yet you have zero understanding of the subject while I have studied it at the graduate level.

    Have you read Loève on probability theory? Do you understand the Chapman-Kolmolgoraov equation? The answer is no in both cases

    "There is no magic in science." Correct, your religious-based nonsense is NOT science.

  • @GoodScienceForYou "So, far the mudskipper has been around for millions of years AS a mudskipper... "

    Millions of years? You've claimed in the past that all dating methods were worthless and now you accept millions of years? Whatever is convenient to support your religious crap, you spout.

  • @GoodScienceForYou "I don't want any religious crap in the science classes"

    ALL of your arguments are religion-based. Tell me, Mr. scientist, what research have you done?

  • @GoodScienceForYou "Are you nuts or just forgot to look at evidence?"

    YOU NEVER look at evidence. You simply DENY IT. You are a fraud, a loser, and a moron.

  • @GSFY: "A It doesn't matter what the consensus is"

    Yes it does, because the consensus is generated by REAL scientists, not creationist morons like you

    "..has no scientific credibility" In the world of REAL science, it has much credibility. YOU are the one who has no credibility. You are a religious jerk - we all know it

    "You are delusional if you think that religious bullshit needs to be in science" I don't - that is why I point our your religious bullshit. Your forum sucks, moron.

  • @GoodScienceForYou STupid coward! LMAO!

    Run Jimmy, run!

  • @GoodScienceForYou COWARD!!

  • @GoodScienceForYou  COWARD!

    LMAO!

  • @GoodScienceForYou: "You are scientifically illiterate ..." Compared to a real scientist, that is true. Compared to you, I am Einstein.

    .

    You are the one who did not understand the concept of a half-life after 42 years of studying atomic theory. You could not calculate the age of a specimen using a simple ODE. I doubt that you knew what ODE meant, though you'd Google it, find out, and then lie and claim that you did know . You didn't know who Popper was until I mentioned him.

  • @GoodScienceForYou: "The methods of a yogi are not easily understood, but the results are designed to help you..."

    .

    Yeah, if the yogi is insane, his actions ARE hard to understand!

  • GSFY - in an attempt to get you back on the debate about evolution, you've repeatedly claimed that you can refute it, so what is your best piece of evidence against evolution?

  • GSFY - having an excellent funny video by straighdope, 'The Pornography Debate', in my favourites may be evidence that I have a sense of humour, but little else, and it certainly doesn't constitute proof of anything. If you'd watched it you would have realised it's not what you think or claim. You have a problem understanding what 'evidence' and 'proof' actually are don't you Jimmy?

  • GSFY - you do realise that many universities share computer resources and ip addresses and use proxies, including my own? As for my 'superiors' perhaps I should bring your laughable offerings to their attention so they too can have a jolly good laugh!

  • GSFY - so you're back to projecting again Jimmy, back to your old tactic of claiming those who disagree with you are sex perverts, you first tried that on some of those hot-tub forums that were so revealing about you. You talk a lot about 'homos', 'queers', 'dicks', 'ass', 'sucking off' and the like, you seem obsessed with gay sex, is your inner self trying to tell you something?

  • @GoodScienceForYou: "No I posted that you are an old man stalker and must be a pervert, because of your obsession with me. The only people who stalk other people are perverts."

    .

    Again you lie. You posted this 3 hours ago:

    GoodScienceForYou

    3 hours ago

    @AlanCFA Alan is a child molester as well as a stalker of GoodScienceForYou."

    The Evodelusion religion is the religion of sex perverts."

    .

    Now you claim that you did not post that? You post so many lies you can't keep them straight.

  • @GoodScienceForYou: "Don't you know that God does not equal religion? "

    You claim that your god = truth, but that is a lie. You believe in the traditional notion of God. If you did not, you'd be an atheist.

    You claim that anyone who believes something that cannot be proven is insane. You believe in God, so prove His existence. If you can't you are insane by your own definition.

  • @GSFY- I don't hate Christ. I don't believe in God and I do not believe that Jesus was the son of God. You want to claim that you "have no religion" and you IMPLY that you are not a Christian. If you deny Christ and say that he is not your lord and savior, I will accept that. ALL of your arguments against evolution are IDENTICAL to those made by creationists; you wrote that you were a Christian, so I believe that you are one. You can prove me wrong, but you won't. That confirms it

  • @GoodScienceForYou - I am not gay, but like Ted Haggard and George Rekers, you are obsessed with gays. You will not deny Christ. That would not be a problem if you were not a Christian, but since you are, you don't want to piss Him off. You evade acknowledging Christian beliefs by stating that you have no religion, but you will not say that Jesus is not your lord and savior. If you are not a Christian, why would this be an issue for you?

    p.s. you will not give a straight answer to that

  • @GoodScienceForYou - "You didn't answer my question"

    You never answer my questions, so why should I answer yours? You are a coward who cannot answer the simplest things.

  • @GoodScienceForYou: "Only a person who has been molested by a priest..."

    .

    How long have you had these obsessions about molestation?

    p.s. I will answer your questions when you are ready to answer mine.

    Here is a simple one: "Is Jesus Christ your personal Lord and Savior"? A simple yes or no will suffice. I will answer any TWO questions you put to me if you answer that one with a clear yes or no.

    .

    The questions must be legitimate, none of the "when did you stop beating your wife" kind.

  • @GoodScienceForYou

    Of course you did not answer the question. You want to complain that I don't answer your questions, well, I will say again that I will answer any TWO legitimate questions in a straightforward manner if you answer THIS ONE: “Is Jesus Christ your personal Lord and Savior"? Yes or no?

    .

    You will not give me a yes or no because you are a Christian. Pure and simple.

    Watch this: Jesus Christ is not my lord and savior. See how easy it is when you are not a Christian?

  • @GoodScienceForYou - you seem to be obsessed with homosexuality and molestation. Are you reliving something from your childhood?

    As Shakespeare once noted, methinks you doth protest too much!

  • @AlanCFA - so after a flurry of ludicrous homosexual and child-abuse accusations GSFY seems to gone quiet on this video(or has he at last been blocked by a Christian?). He claims to be against 'religious bullshit' but is remarkably quiet when on channels such as Geerup or Nephi... hmm, is he scared of debating them? If you read this Jimmy, when are you going to tackle their 'religious bullshit'?

  • @KrokrX - yep, as soon as I asked “Is Jesus Christ your personal Lord and Savior", he went back to his previous tactics of evasion and spewing nonsense and now he is quiet (for awhile).

    .

    I've not seen a Christian on YT who would be afraid to answer that question except for GSFY. He wants to pretend that this is science and not religion, so he cannot say "yes" to that question, but he does not want to say "no" and upset Jesus

    You can guess what question I will ask him from this point forward!!

  • @AlanCFA - as GSFY loudly proclaims his Siddha Yoga background I'm surprised that he feels unable to deny Jesus as his personal saviour, after all he did refer to him as 'an avatar of enlightenment' which seems to fall well short of a Christian description of god. Perhaps he doesn't want to say it quite so bluntly as it'll make him unwelcome in some places, or perhaps he's more Christian than he likes to admit even to himself?!

  • GSFY - You have NO chance of me entering a dialogue with you on your feeble excuse for a forum where you can, and do, edit/delete posts at will.

    I know far more about Siddha Yoga than you do about science, but that's easy as you know so little about science!

  • @KrokrX - if we were to play the GSFY game, you could claim to have read 20,000 papers on the Siddha Yoga cult.

  • @AlanCFA - no, if I played the game like GSFY I'd claim to have read over 200,000 papers/articles on Siddha Yoga, and over 20,000 in depth, and I'd refer to it as Yogadelusionism!! Hey Jimmy, you one of those Yogadelusionists?

  • GSFY - you say 'I want all religious bullshit out of science', well it is, and we intend to keep it out which is why we reject your inane ramblings and religious pseudo-science. Get some professional help and take the medications offered.

  • GSFY - I know far more about Siddha Yoga than you do about science, but that's easy as you know so little about science!

  • @GoodScienceForYou - the average wino laying in the gutter knows more about yoga than you know about science.

    As to Siddha Path, it is a cult full of brainwashed fools like you who will never know the truth because you have blinded yourselves to it.

  • @GoodScienceForYou "r. My personal savior is the inner Guru. "

    If you were not a Christian, you would answer the question about whether Jesus was your savior. You would say "No, Jesus Christ is not my Lord and Savior, my savior is the inner guru. But you only say the last half of that because you are a Christian and you will not deny Christ.

    Do you really think that your cowardly evasions will convince anybody that your anti-evolution rants are anything other than religious bleating?

  • @GoodScienceForYou STUPID COWARD! 

  • @GoodScienceForYou Nothing but a coward!  I love it that he runs. It shows that he is either too scared or just way too stupid.

    I believe the latter! LMAO!

  • @KrokrX - "Perhaps he doesn't want to say it quite so bluntly as it'll make him unwelcome in some places..."

    I think that he is a Christian and is worried about pissing Jesus off.

  • @GoodScienceForYou - it is easy to see in you that you are a Christian who pretends to be a scientist. You kept screaming that I would not answer your questions and I agreed to answer any TWO legitimate questions in a straightforward manner if you answered THIS ONE: “Is Jesus Christ your personal Lord and Savior"? Yes or no?

    You will not give me a yes or no because you are a Christian. Pure and simple. As you like to say believe what is obvious - it is obvious that you are a Christian

  • @GoodScienceForYou - we both know that you wrote that.

    But again, if you wish to say that your beliefs have changed, take this opportunity to deny Christ. Say that he is not your lord and savior and you will have no more posts from me about your Christian beliefs. I will still point out your other lies.

  • @GoodScienceForYou: "You are telling people that I am a Christian". Yes, from YOUR postings, where YOU said that YOU were a Christian. You also told John to try a Jehovah's Witness Bible Study. You also said that your God = truth when you pretend not to be religious, but have stated a belief in God MANY TIMES on YouTube

    .

    I thought your last name in sanskrit was translated as "compulsive liar" or "delusional fool". You can't read and you post crap claiming that I said you were born in 1966!