to some of you that say the tail lights on the new mustang are kinda weird lookin. i did agree till i saw it in person. in pics, yea the tail lights, plus that black part thats part of the bumper looks a little ehh. but see the car in person first. cuz in person that car is awesome looking all over
To update your statement. The Camaro SS with 420 HP 6.0 is being compared to the Mustang GT with 315 HP 4.6
The Camaro wins in 0-60
The Mustang wins in Slalom, braking, and overall handling
The Camaro does a 13.4 quarter mile while the Mustang does a 13.5
The Mustang also has a much lower price tag and runs damn good comparisons for a smaller engine. In my personal opinion the Camaro looks nicer in person than on screen, but isn't what it's hyped up to be. Give me the Stang.
chevy put a 426 HP engine in the new camaro because of its weight....they had to run similar numbers to the mustang. but people dont understand that.....they just see the number 426 and bust a load to it
@Heezy2090 Ya like i did at first. i thought the camaro was around the same weight. into i check into it. the new 2011 gt is a shit load faster then the camaro / challenger with 412 hp. when the 05-09's were just as fast.
Yea Im pretty sure there putting a LS3 in the Camaro SS which putting out mid 4's for HP. Along with a 6 speed manual tranny. GM is finally doing it right. lol
its because on all the recent tests the z outhandles and out accelerates the gt... its been all over the recent magazines..so its really not assumed...
it is def faster and has better handling but its a compltly diffrent car.. sports car vs muscle.. you cant beat mustangs for the price though i mean its truly cheap speed.... but there getting slower and slower as they go on and you could by a nice luxury car like the new acura tl thats faster.. and luxury and not cheap
The Camaro SS is out. does 0-60 posted on most sites in 4.6-4.7 seconds which is faster than the Mustang GT by a few tenths of a second. I wouldnt call that a killing. Unless maybe all you did with your car is put in the track day in and day out with a Mustang, then you could brag "Ha, I beat you" everyday, that sounds like fun.
Yea can't wait for the Camaro to come out, but it proably will not happen now since GM getting ready to go belly up. So the only thing Camaro will be smoking is "what if' and it's own press clippings.
I haven't seen one yet. I know they were supposed to come out in 09 but I haven't seen one around here at all. *shrug* I guess nobody feels like spending 40g's on a Camaro.
ford claims 4.9 to 60. Thats of course with a professional test driver. However a decent driver with a short shifter can do it. When i just has a short shifter on it i clocked 4.96 to 60 which of course ford would round down. a stock one with a decent driver could most likley pull off probably 5.1
any one who has ever driven a sti (EXCEPT THE NEW THAT SHIT LOOKS WACK )WILL NEVER BE satisfied drivin another average muscle car unless of that car is shitin out over 500hp (but of course thats only good in perfectly straight roadS unless its c6 )
oo please no way a fucking piece of shit mazda 6 is faster than a mustang, cause i have a mustang, and i have raced a mazda 6. mazda 6 0-60 is like 7.3, mustang says for a base v6 is 6.6, but you can get that closer to 6ish, gt is 5.1, which you can get to about 4.9.
neither a V6 or 4 cyl mazda6 will do 0-60 in 5.8. and with a GOOD driver a new GT can do it in around 5.1. i dont know why people feel the need to quote false performance numbers.
yeah it can and the stock 6.0 sec's 0-60 on the new mustangs are slow, but the stang is faster once its gains some ground unless its long than 1/4mile the mazda 6 has a higher top speed.
i see, it makes sense, weight ratio, you can always supercharge the stang, it has room for 500+ HP but that's kinda stupid for stock suspensions, you'll lose control, i dont know about mazdas, they're decent cars for me, iam a muscle guy
You are a liar. I own a 07 Mustang GT and to accelerate that fast you would have to have a good amount of mods. A much better launch and shift faster than my Grandma. Good try though.
I highly doubt it was 4.2 sec. He had a passenger too. Without the passenger and a perfect start it would be 4 flat. But 4.2 sec to 65mph. WHAT A JOKE!!!!
Dam dat dint seen to me like 4.2 man I got an 03 gt n I do like 5 so maybe something like dat but not 4.2
este351w 1 year ago
lol 4.2 seconds?!?! try like 6.5.....
majicman999 1 year ago
nice
karakapara 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
slow as fuck
HighpsiaddicT 2 years ago
that sounds like 3:31 gearing. long gears for good gas milage, and some acceleration, i can tell the diff, between 3:31 and 3:55
mazda6tuner99 2 years ago
i get to 60 in 4.3 ; ) shelby all the way
mafiaman1986 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bullshit theres no way in hell you got to fucking to 65 in 4.2
you couldnt even get to 40 in 4.2
nice try dumbfuck
p8ntballr101 2 years ago
to some of you that say the tail lights on the new mustang are kinda weird lookin. i did agree till i saw it in person. in pics, yea the tail lights, plus that black part thats part of the bumper looks a little ehh. but see the car in person first. cuz in person that car is awesome looking all over
LCPLVelten 2 years ago 3
I'm sorry I meant 6.2 L
Kooly1 2 years ago
To update your statement. The Camaro SS with 420 HP 6.0 is being compared to the Mustang GT with 315 HP 4.6
The Camaro wins in 0-60
The Mustang wins in Slalom, braking, and overall handling
The Camaro does a 13.4 quarter mile while the Mustang does a 13.5
The Mustang also has a much lower price tag and runs damn good comparisons for a smaller engine. In my personal opinion the Camaro looks nicer in person than on screen, but isn't what it's hyped up to be. Give me the Stang.
Kooly1 2 years ago 4
chevy put a 426 HP engine in the new camaro because of its weight....they had to run similar numbers to the mustang. but people dont understand that.....they just see the number 426 and bust a load to it
Heezy2090 2 years ago 13
still beats the mustang
camaroman102 2 years ago
lol
Reyes05 2 years ago
@Heezy2090 Ya like i did at first. i thought the camaro was around the same weight. into i check into it. the new 2011 gt is a shit load faster then the camaro / challenger with 412 hp. when the 05-09's were just as fast.
TVdinnerFTW 1 year ago
agreed
105jim 2 years ago
Comment removed
b1ackhawk89 2 years ago
Yea Im pretty sure there putting a LS3 in the Camaro SS which putting out mid 4's for HP. Along with a 6 speed manual tranny. GM is finally doing it right. lol
GXPFiend 2 years ago
i cant belive a Nissan 370Z is assumed to be better than this...
smartkid1985 2 years ago
You know what happens when people ASSUME right? :D
For the money a Mustang is unbeatable.
Kooly1 2 years ago
LOL
smartkid1985 2 years ago
its because on all the recent tests the z outhandles and out accelerates the gt... its been all over the recent magazines..so its really not assumed...
bp240 2 years ago
it is def faster and has better handling but its a compltly diffrent car.. sports car vs muscle.. you cant beat mustangs for the price though i mean its truly cheap speed.... but there getting slower and slower as they go on and you could by a nice luxury car like the new acura tl thats faster.. and luxury and not cheap
timmunn1 2 years ago
yeah it seems to be whats the bang for the buck these days....
smartkid1985 2 years ago
Mustangs the greatest ever
Fordman06777 2 years ago 5
The Camaro SS is out. does 0-60 posted on most sites in 4.6-4.7 seconds which is faster than the Mustang GT by a few tenths of a second. I wouldnt call that a killing. Unless maybe all you did with your car is put in the track day in and day out with a Mustang, then you could brag "Ha, I beat you" everyday, that sounds like fun.
WSTPIII 2 years ago
4.2...lmao all this dudes videos he is saying crazy shit like that in the titles...youtube is so funny
tylerxfire 2 years ago
Yea can't wait for the Camaro to come out, but it proably will not happen now since GM getting ready to go belly up. So the only thing Camaro will be smoking is "what if' and it's own press clippings.
bondobooty 3 years ago
nope comes out next fall
kelly6580 3 years ago
the new camaro can smoke both the stang and the challenger
pony car lmao
kelly6580 3 years ago
Yeah, can'twait for that to happen. When do you think that will be, 2025? 26 maybe? Hmm..
zackomac 3 years ago
nope 2010 or early 2011
kelly6580 3 years ago
It was supposed to be 08, then 09, now 10 or 11. They just need to shit the thing out already..
zackomac 3 years ago 2
no the concept was 08-09 but the real deal with every model available will be out in 2010
kelly6580 3 years ago
You dont want to rush these things cuz then it'll come out all fucked up
Karnage542 2 years ago
What are you replying to exactly? sorry
zackomac 2 years ago
When you said "It was supposed to be 08, then 09, now 10 or 11. They just need to shit the thing out already"
Karnage542 2 years ago
Already came out.. :)
2009
manindermaninder 2 years ago
I haven't seen one yet. I know they were supposed to come out in 09 but I haven't seen one around here at all. *shrug* I guess nobody feels like spending 40g's on a Camaro.
zackomac 2 years ago
I haven't seen one either yet. I think it just came out last month, so it'll take a while. Same thing happened with Mustangs for me..
manindermaninder 2 years ago
I saw one last Monday or Tuesday. Not sure I like the tail lights on the new Mustangs or not .. the interior's awesome though.
Even though I'm a Ford guy I gotta give it to the new Camaro -- that interior's fuckin badass
zackomac 2 years ago
Yeah the new Mustang does look good, but the tail lights are what need to be thought over again.
manindermaninder 2 years ago
yeah, that's what I said too. I like the front end, love the interior, but the tail lights .. idk
zackomac 2 years ago
ford claims 4.9 to 60. Thats of course with a professional test driver. However a decent driver with a short shifter can do it. When i just has a short shifter on it i clocked 4.96 to 60 which of course ford would round down. a stock one with a decent driver could most likley pull off probably 5.1
V8mustang17 3 years ago
Nice hand position moron
vintageracer89 3 years ago
any one who has ever driven a sti (EXCEPT THE NEW THAT SHIT LOOKS WACK )WILL NEVER BE satisfied drivin another average muscle car unless of that car is shitin out over 500hp (but of course thats only good in perfectly straight roadS unless its c6 )
desoto01 3 years ago
odd cause I've driven EVOs, STIs and WRXs and I'm still happy w. my lil bolton 97 Cobra.
zackomac 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Cute toy get a real muscle car like a camaro
TainoWarrior316 3 years ago
Yeah, cause they sell those - cause people have been buying them. Oh wait they don't make em.
magicalpoop 3 years ago 2
Actually they do sell them it's called a used car but I see the point you're trying to get across.
cjfresh4 3 years ago
lol I guess it was rude - but hey it doesn't matter. The big 3 are all going to die soon unfortunately . Well there goes the warranty on my mustang.
magicalpoop 3 years ago
the mustang has the true muscle feel
hish911 3 years ago
ah man my peugeot 106 does like 0-65 in under 3s... kicks ass
i'm taking the p*ss! I love mustangs, but not sure why so many people brag with false figures
snoofrob 3 years ago
Yeah I agree.
mxt2s 3 years ago
u still have ugly ass peugeot u dumb fuck. u and ur ugly ass car.
mejus16 3 years ago
ah i see you are american.. no sense of humour then.. see my comment.. taking the piss!! learn to read first!! DUMBASS!!
snoofrob 3 years ago
Not all Americans are stupid, thank you. lol
zackomac 3 years ago
MY saturn SC1 1997 does 0-60 in under 2 secondes !!! Youtube make me laugh more and more with buddys who spell shit
K4rImXj 3 years ago
No way was that 65mph in 4.2 seconds dude.
MommysLittleMonster7 3 years ago
more like 65 kilometers...LOL ;)
fordfs 3 years ago
otherwise thats evo sti territory
raghavaj 3 years ago
oo please no way a fucking piece of shit mazda 6 is faster than a mustang, cause i have a mustang, and i have raced a mazda 6. mazda 6 0-60 is like 7.3, mustang says for a base v6 is 6.6, but you can get that closer to 6ish, gt is 5.1, which you can get to about 4.9.
joe010691 3 years ago
joe u should know that you can always add stuff to cars and we dont knwo what tpe of mustang it is we dont know
neoopera 3 years ago
crazy...
coandcaiv 3 years ago
neither a V6 or 4 cyl mazda6 will do 0-60 in 5.8. and with a GOOD driver a new GT can do it in around 5.1. i dont know why people feel the need to quote false performance numbers.
jmt0602 3 years ago
lol your car stock only goes 5.8-6.0sec my mazda6 does that and its it 4 banger.
deluxedookie 3 years ago
i thought mazda6 was v6, and even if it had I4, noway in hell it can be that fast
pkidro 3 years ago
yeah it can and the stock 6.0 sec's 0-60 on the new mustangs are slow, but the stang is faster once its gains some ground unless its long than 1/4mile the mazda 6 has a higher top speed.
deluxedookie 3 years ago
i see, it makes sense, weight ratio, you can always supercharge the stang, it has room for 500+ HP but that's kinda stupid for stock suspensions, you'll lose control, i dont know about mazdas, they're decent cars for me, iam a muscle guy
pkidro 3 years ago
Ford says that the mustang gt will 0-60 with a proper driver in 5.8s
stallionmcr 3 years ago
well then there wrong its like 5.4
adammdamann 3 years ago
the 0-60 with the proper driver is 5.1 but i have done 4.9 that only with manuel the automatic is 5.4
StngRayCorv 3 years ago
stil pretty good
adammdamann 3 years ago
agreed no way a 4 second at all unless its like boosted or somethin
94EglVisionTSI 3 years ago
You are a liar. I own a 07 Mustang GT and to accelerate that fast you would have to have a good amount of mods. A much better launch and shift faster than my Grandma. Good try though.
dopemofoizzle 4 years ago
lying motherfucker 4.2 seconds my ass
stmartinez10 4 years ago
65 my ass my 600hp hemi can only hit 115 in that shhort of time and i dont think you have that much hp.
kd5fhq 4 years ago
My V6 Altima SE-R runs 0-60 in 5.9 and this is no quicker than my car. Bullllllshittttt
kramerbuccs24 4 years ago
4.2? Highly doubt it. I outrun new stangs and my 0-60 is 5 flat. Hell it takes me over 30 seconds to reach 150. :)
nevermissclancom 4 years ago
They could have been going down a pretty decent hill to :) then it could do it in 4.2...
Moltixar 4 years ago
i dunno lol, a c6 vette does it in like 4.6sec
burtonsnow157 4 years ago
the C6 vette 438hp does 0-60 in 4.3 and the Z06 is 3.6 and the C5 Z06 which i have i know for a fact does 4.07 sec
StngRayCorv 3 years ago
I highly doubt it was 4.2 sec. He had a passenger too. Without the passenger and a perfect start it would be 4 flat. But 4.2 sec to 65mph. WHAT A JOKE!!!!
tamapalagi 4 years ago 3
Speed Kills.
cavlovc1 4 years ago 2
I say thats a 6... its as fast as mine lmao
mustangfan00 4 years ago
i think your fatass put the timings for how fast you can eat a hotdog instead of your cars 0-60.
whtcanbrwnd04u 4 years ago 19
lol
mcromance1 4 years ago 3
@whtcanbrwnd04u maybe how long he lasts in bed... 4.2 seconds my ass for that 0-60
cebayne 1 year ago
@whtcanbrwnd04u LOLOLOL
BAWLS2894 1 year ago
@whtcanbrwnd04u
damn dude why would you even say something like that? your fucked up dude, check yourself
jgpwlcs36 1 year ago
@whtcanbrwnd04u LOLOL
teamwhitebread2 1 year ago
thats exactly like mine except mine is an automatic. im suprised at how the standard drives, it seems like the auto was faster.
R3DBULLX23 4 years ago
automatics will shift and accelerate much faster than manual, unless the manual's driver knows what he/she is doing. (for street cars not drag)
thumpetto007 4 years ago
it's definitely the V8
stanbernadino 4 years ago
v6's dont roar at all
adammdamann 4 years ago
LOLLL u shift soooo slow man...like so slow, sorry but u do lol
janjaso 4 years ago
go to 180
mine gose up to 220:)
handparty101 4 years ago