Added: 11 months ago
From: LockheedMartinVideos
Views: 47,855
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (73)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • my uncle is a programmer at Lockheed, and i got to see the f-35 assembly line. that was cool.

  • Cool, But I wish they would just tell the truth about how much we really know... Like if you know what I mean..

  • love the video really good

  • some sweet info here

  • love the work here

  • really informative and interesting

  • you have some great stuff here

  • interesting video and very informative

  • great video thanks

  • brilliant video

  • HOLD ON SO FROM A COOL PLANE LIKE SPACE CRAFT NASA WENT BACK TO THE OLD SCHOOL SHIPS LOOK LIKE BUDGETS CUTS TO ME MORE THEN ADVANCE WHY IN THE HELL WOULD THEY USE THE SAME LOOK A LIKE CRAP O F SHIPS HUMAN SPACE TECH LOOKS LIKE A JOKE ALINE MUST SAY LOOK AT THE CRAP HAHAHAHAHA

  • @deadcauz I think your caps lock key is broken

  • @deadcauz the laws of aerodynamics have not changed since the, and they made those to be the ideal balance for maximum performance and efficiency, so go fuck yourself, i doubt you have ever designed a spacecraft and know nothing about it.

  • God damn lockheed the build quality even on your videos is impressive,

  • Does anyone know the background music from about 5:00 to the end?

  • Not in human space flight in human exploration. 

  • Excellent

  • This is not NASA. Its a PSA from Lockheed promoting the uses of the Orion capsule.

  • So they are going back to 60's tech for the next generation of space craft guess NASA finally learned that the old designs were better

  • @barf245 Well I would say better I would say depending on what you are looking for either design are great. If you need to go to low earth orbit then yes fine. Around 22,000 miles but if you intend to go to the Moon 238,000 miles away you need something with longer legs. An what worked in the 60s with mordern technology safe design and a higher likely hood that all involved will return. We almost lost Apollo 13 and we lost Challanger and Colombia.

  • Mt. SINAI in Egypt: surprising image of human face with two horns. Also a photo of a very huge human hand sculpted on two rectangles, all of them excavated on the hard rock of the Sinai zone in Egypt. webspace.webring.com/people/or­/ramonetriu/moises.html SPANISH

    Mt. Sinaí: Rostro humano con cuernos (foto de satélite NASA).

    La foto aérea de todo el conjunto de ásperas cubres en el sur de la península del Sinaí, en Egipto. webspace.webring.com/people/or­/ramonetriu/sinai.html

  • When you look at the world. It looks bankrupt and near to the cliff of no return. But like all dead lands they are seeds of life what are starting to grow!

    In Pain there is Gain. Indeed in pain there is Gain.

  • Comment removed

  • @PlaneAU to bad skylon still has no type of testing going on

  • @PlaneAU lol you're funny

  • @PlaneAU Skylon is unmanned.

  • What launch rocket will send this capsule into LEO for tests flights?

  • @Kapitananime Right now the plan is to launch on the Space Launch System ie the really big rocket NASA is currently working on. There is a proposal to launch Orion ( I really hate the MPCV name) on Delta IV Heavy for its initial test flights so they don't have to wait for the SLS to be ready.

  • @rfairman SLS = Senate Launch System. Congress is designing it. They are designing it so their old friends get the contracts and they want to make sure no new commercial space companies get any funding gain traction to displace them. Also the Senate launch System is basically a federally funded jobs program to allow the powerful space state congress people to boast about bring jobs back to their states (FL, TX & CA). It has nothing to do with what is best for NASA.

  • @jim6584 SLS Shit Launch System so they can take all the garbage from landfills and shoot it into space also over filled septic tanks..../facepalm

  • @Kapitananime not absolutely determined yet.. Final evaluation is still a bit away . not that far away though .. 

  • @Penguinguy31596 how can you prove something safer when its still in testing. We will see how safe it is once it has been put into use. You have at least 30 years of shuttle history and only months of MPCV history.

  • There are no real scientists left anymore...Only brainwashed hollywood simpletons who are enticed by primitive instincts like "looks", "sound" and "sexuality"...

  • is the MPCV proven safer then the shuttle?

  • This design is sound. Many of the design principles are already space proven. Safety for the crew is DRASTICALLY improved compared to the STS.

    Affordability, safety and versatility are called for. With a new Direct class launch vehicle and Orion, we have a future in NASA manned space flight.

  • That's it? That's the best design they came up with? So much for creativity. Why oh why are they still using old designs and not something new and radical like the spaceship from the movie MISSION TO MARS? Are you telling me that there is going to be no artificial gravity? This is an epic failure.

  • @jiat2001 Spacecraft design is about proven functionality. It's not about appeasing the science-illiterate masses with a sleek, pretty machine. A centrifuge would be somewhat of a tricky feat, but a centrifuge with artificial gravity will one day be constructed as a module for testing on the ISS (if not cancelled) . Look up the NAUTILUS-X spacecraft; it has plans for a centrifuge.

  • @jiat2001

    What an impractical feature. That is an immense expenditure with absolutely no benefits.

    Why don't you stop basing scientific feats off of Hollywood glamorization...This is why America isn't the pinnacle of civilization that it once used to be anymore...Because morons like you are too obsessed with superficial rationality.

    You inhibit practicality and sensibility...

    There is no such thing as a true "scientific endeavor" anymore...

  • Hey, if I didn't value my life much, would you send me to YU 55, in November? You know, it sounds like any monkey in a space suit could do it. But you would have to pay me to go to 3753 Cruithne or 2002 AA29, like bordem pay. Unless, I could you know test some anti asteroid systems, I'd do that for free :-)

  • Obama's space program was conceived by the underpants gnomes.

    Step 1: Cancel Constellation.

    Step 2: ...

    Step 3: American astronauts land on near-earth-asteroid.

  • Lockheed Martin has the wherewithal, politically, financially, and technically ... to develop and deploy space-based solar power.

    In the long view, fossil fuels will eventually require more energy to recover than they will produce (EI/EO>1). When that happens, the planet will need a new baseload power source.

    Space-based solar power will be that new baseload power source. The question is, will an American company take the lead in its development, or will we be racing to catch-up again?

  • @mariettawoodworks Yeah, they've been developing biofuel, from what I've heard by 2016 (or somewhere near there) the USAF plans to get all of their fighters on it.

  • I'm glad they are keeping Orion but ditching the way-too-complicated Ares rockets. Why not use rockets that already exist? Good logical choice.

  • Pretty cool

  • This is an other example of the type of the technology available now days. If only it could be used towards better purposes.

    If Giant LockHeedMartin would join forces with projects such as THE VENUS PROJECT (PLease google) everyone in earth could enjoy a better quality of life.

  • Seems legit, i'm getting one!

  • YES! SPAce is the Place

  • Wowwww, how IS IT that there are like MILLIONS of views on this?? Git 'er done!!

  • After years of telling us that astronauts where essential to the exploration of space, NASA, or what's left of it, is obviously switching to robots and “launching people into space” is no longer a goal of the global criminal elite who control NASA and the rest of their worldwide system of inculcation and control.

  • @amayzen139 Hahahahhahha you've got some trust issues I see.

  • @Impulset0 He might have good reason to!

  • @amayzen139 OBVIOUSLY, YOU FAILED English. What part of "crew" do YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?? YEEEEUP, EFFERS or POLITICIANS, and people in a position of POWER TELL LIES. Whadda we gonna do? Being a good LIAR is a prerequisite. Ya really have to LOVE your enthusiasm and attitude. Sounds to me like you NEED A LIFE RATHER THAN WORRYING SO MUCH ABOUT WHAT EVERYONE ELSE IS DOING. You're one of those with INTERNET BALLS. You have the BIGGEST BALLS, UNTIL SOMEONE SEE'S 'EM. There's the fantasy.... ;-)

  • @philipjmartin Lockheed Martin are the ones wanting to know what everyone else is up to.

  • Yep! This is all about each group getting tplay with their toys from slave labor. YOU!  Well let's just see!

  • Godspeed

  • The whole thing is a giant scam that dupes raised on Star Trek and Star Wars will never be able to see through and meanwhile Lockheed Martin and their ilk will continue to rake in billions from a gullible population of sheeple. Technology is a false god that will never save humanity from self-inflicted maladies. Save yourself!

  • @amayzen139 Lockheed Martin make Trident missiles, cluster bombs and F-16 fighter jets. They have won the£150m contract to run the UK census, of which we will get fined £1000 for not filling in the form with all of our personal information.

  • If you had told people in the late Sixties that in 2011 there would still be no humans on Mars and no moon bases, they would have laughed you out of the room—everybody knew that the future portrayed in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey was just around the corner. Well, it didn't happen and it's never gonna happen. There's a reason they call it science “fiction,” perhaps they should call it “science fantasy.”

  • Although I believe that the shuttle's re-entry--and the shuttle in general--is a whole lot cooler, the main thing NASA is trying to do is cut costs. This is the cheapest, safest, and most reliable way of launching people into space.

  • @1upgraphix

    *Looking at Soyuz*

    Admit it that design is no revolutionary and in fact pretty old.

    However that proven design is indeed highly reliable and effective although missing the "cool factor" which Space Shuttle always has.

  • similar to apollo??40 years and no significant milestones still on re entry nd space exploration?

  • Although I never finished my studies in Chemical engineer, and because of my life long fascination for Cosmology, I am afraid I am unable to accept this "new socultion" provided with ORION. iT SURELY appears and shall always appear to me as a STEP BACKWARDS - AFTER THE SHUTTLE. iT APPEARS RIDICULOUS TO HAVE VEHICLES RE-ENTERING AGAIN TO FALL ON THE OCEAN... Despite the advance technology of ORION, it shall always appear as the good old "capsule" of the 1960's - SORRY for my honest opinion!

  • @AugustusAurelianus1 This type of vehicle tends to explode less frequently, and is much cheaper to get off the ground than the shuttle. Both definate points in its favour

  • FINALLY, the future of humanity AND Human Space Travel has FINALLY COME...

    About... Damn... Time...

  • OFT-1, 2013, I can't wait!

  • So awesome

  • this has to be a front.

  • Go Orion! 

  • leme work for u 

  • Awesome! :D

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more