The results of radiocarbon measurements at Arizona, Oxford and Zurich yield a calibrated calendar age range with at least 95% confidence for the linen of the Shroud of Turin of AD 1260 - 1390 (rounded down/up to nearest 10 yr). These results therefore provide conclusive evidence that the linen of the Shroud of Turin is mediaeval.
The results for the three control samples agree well with previous radiocarbon measurements and/or historical dates.
Well, those were violent times. They could've had faked a Crucifixion with some unlucky chap and then created the shroud out of a real dead body. Though I think people wouldn't know that Jesus time's crucifixion would have the nails at the wrist. Anyway, a very cool mystery. And btw I am christian, but I would like more evidence before accepting it as authentic.
Jesus Christ Our Savior Leaves a PROOF of his face and telling us a message how he really loves us for everyone can see his pain on that shroud. Jesus Christ saves us from our sins that's the TRUE message of that shroud of Turin nothing more. To our God be the Glory in the Mighty name of Jesus Christ our Savior Amen.
@SuperSesey its NOT jesus!!! its based on someone leonardo da vinci knew. if you line up the faces, everything is symetrical, just like the mona lisa was based on da vinci himself! this was on TV last night
@jajaPINOY yes i do believe this is the son of GOD JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD AND SAVER AMEN JESUS WANTS EVERONE TO KNOW WHAT HE DID FOR MANKIND AMEN GOD BLESS ALL
My grand father was a minister, and a very popular one not given to fetishes or different molestations. This shroud has as much to do with Jesus as my dirty laundry. Do your homework on this one folks. You are learning how to waste your God given life listening to this bunk about a 'sacred shroud'. Please stop and know the Lord would have it so that you did find something better to do with your lives.
You can't just tell people that they have never seen jesus/god , my mom had the same encounter , and it is possible . Some people are just lucky enough to get a glimpse of the son of god .
I believe in a man called Jesus, I believe he came here to save us, I have faith in that and I'm great full for what he did.
However I do not have a mind strong enough to ever imagine that their is a god.. I don't mean to offend anyone but in the world we live in where we see INNOCENT people die every day and INNOCENT people struggle to cope with their surroundings I couldn't grasp the idea of a God. I value each and every persons beliefs and wish you all happiness from your faith.
Wow! If that is the real face of Christ, then Jim Caviezel looks pretty much EXACTLY like the Lord in The Passion of the Christ. Proving once again that that film is the closet thing we will ever have to being there.
When you know all the details on the shroud and how they match the biblical account and how the shroud cannot be duplicated and its images could not have been created by human hands with the technology available hundreds of years ago, the case becomes overwhelming that the shroud is authentic.
@doubts Not necessarily. In terms of software, there's little difference between 2000 and 7. The reason for this is because the program they used to render the model was likely older, and therefore no conversion to 7 was needed. Source: programmer.
New evidence suggests the Turin Shroud was a source of inspiration for Elgar’s ‘Enigma’ Variations. The timing is right because Secondo Pia’s famous photographic negative became an international sensation five months before Elgar began work on the Variations. To learn more about the multiple connections between the Turin Shroud and the ‘Enigma’ Variations, visit enigmathemeunmasked.blogspot.com/2011/06/links-between-enigma-variations-and.html
I have seen the only Begotten, and he does not look like they depict him. The labor of their endeavors proves that their yoke is not light, and they do not know God.
I believe in jesus , i am skeptical about this though..its a great documentary..it would interesting to know if this sort of crucifixion happened to others aswell as jesus ie crown of thorns , or something else on a persons head , and piercing of the side ? i should imagine that would be common to ensure the victim is def dead ?
@amstellori sorry but even the most feared theist intelectual won't use this argument in any debate because it would look like a fool. What u watching here is mainstream pseudo history. btw I need to be an atheist do disbelief in this shroud bullshit?
@amstellori The New Testament itself refutes the authenticity of the Turin Shroud. John 20:6 says it wasn't made of one piece. Specifically that there was a different piece of linen that covered the head. Three independent labs, in Arizona, Zurich and Oxford, were each given four samples, making 12 datings in all. The dates varied within expected margins of error, but all put the linen as younger than 600 AD. what more you want?
@amstellori And to add to this list, although in this doc it did not mention it, but the shroud contains remains of flowers, consistent with first century Jerusalem area, that were placed alongside the body.
@Jrld11 Hi i studied this al for years, No one other than Christ (Yahushua Commonly called jesus) was ever recorded as having a crown of thorns, its unique. The lance in the side is also unique, the scurging was normal for very evil criminals. The common way to check death was to break the legs so any strengtyh and or breath was gone from the victim. The shroud is not essential if you believe, but it is really him bro.
I've never taken anything in the bible literally. I wouldn't say I'm an athiest, but I think a lot of it was intended to be open to enterpritation. Science has always focused on fact. And I've always been curious in anything that's unexplained. I really like how this was a new revealing breakthrough for both science AND christianity. Very interesting!
The man in the shroud has a bigger nose than the computer re-creation. No reason for the animators to make Jesus look like a gentile. In fact, the image on the cloth has a distinctly ethnic Jewish face. Jesus was a Jew and any re-creations of His image should reflect that He was a Jew. His real name is Yeshua.
This piece is so biased it's not even funny. The shroud is mysterious and will continue to be, but this program is so poorly done that I just have to laugh.
why are there so many paintings, photos, videos, and other stuff that show Jesus as being pierced in the right part of the rib cage and the blood on the linen is on the left side...
@mat31new You need to remember that the Shroud of Turin is not a painting or illustration, but an imprint; it shows what is essentially a mirror image of the man it contained. If you use fingerpaint to make a pair of handprints on a sheet of paper, then stand back and look at them as though they were a "drawing" of two hands instead of an impression, then the imprint you made with your left hand will look like a right hand and vice versa.
@mat31new Tell me friend, where in the Bible does it say that He was pierced on the right side?? The reason we view it being done on His right-hand sign, is because most of the world is right handed, so we like to think that He was stabbed on that side.
@pogorules15 i did not say that he was pierced in the right side. i was questioning why the pictures show him pierced in the right side while the shroud had blood in the left side, and the left side seems more relevant because its the side where the heart is and if the centurion was right handed he would've pierced Jesus in the left side. but, as @TrentSteeele said, the shroud is an imprint, therefore, the left part of the shroud is Jesus' right rib.
One Gospel author mentions the single cloth that wrapped the body of Jesus as it was taken down from the cross. Another Gospel mentioned the burial cloths left semi-wrapped--one for the face and one for the body. What happened to Joseph of Arimathea's single cloth? It clearly wasn't taken to the tomb. It also wasn't a burial cloth. Who knows.
@anebturia The cloth that was used for his head is in italy. It is one of the pieces that supports the Turin to be authentic because the blood in the head wrap matches the marks/stains with in the turin.
I do believe that our creator had a purpose in allowing this cloth to survive over 2000 years, for this end time generation, I can only speculate as to why?, but if you look at all the fact's on this shroud, there is far more proof that this is the actuall face of Jesus Christ, than not.
I think it's God's kindness and love for us to provide us with proof when he want's us to have faith in him without seeing but out of love for us he still gives us tangable proof.
Forensic analysts reckon the blood on ths Shroud of Turin is Type AB. If the Shroud of Turin does convey an actual image of Jesus, and the Shroud is so close to being authentic that its not funny, then Jesus of Nazareth had Type AB blood. To cut a long story short, considered opinion ascertains that the Shroud, being what it is, is totally beyond the capacities of anyone at all to have forged it. Crease lines above and below the head also appear on at least one portrait done in the 6th Century.
People My brother saw Jesus in real. He had an encounter with God. He saw his face. And he said Jesus looked exactly like the Jesus they have shown here
@vknarik please stop the maddness, even Moses could notlook upon the face of G-d the almighty. No one and i mean not one person in this day and time knows what the man yashua because there were no J's in the language back then ,son of Mary looks like.
@zeroslashj "How do you know Jesus was not Caucasian? We don't know Jesus' skin color, and I don't believe it's of any importance."
You're so retarted, you think a caucasian is someone with white skin. The whole of North Africa and the whole of the Indian subcontinent is native home to caucasians and they are dark skinned.
@zeroslashj Do you know where Palestine is? It's directly north of Israel. Israel is right on the equator, and everyone who has ever lived near or on the equator has always been darker skinned. Use your head, he couldn't have been caucasian. Had his parents been American or European, then yes, he would have more then likely been white. But they weren't. All I'm saying is that the image depicted here can't be 100% correct. I'm not trying to argue with anyone, I'm just being logical
@pogorules15 Yes, logically he would have not been Caucasian, but we're talking about a demigod here. Not only that, Jesus has been depicted in numerous ways beyond just Caucasian, including Asian and African, thereby making Jesus a more personal figure rather than one you can absolutely pinpoint.
And no image can be 100% correct. That's just my two cents.
@zeroslashj I completely agree with you that He is more of a personalized figure, but you have to realize that he was more then likely to be what we would describe as a "typical Arab." We also know that He spoke Aramaic, so He had to have been of that "race". But I do agree that we can never have 100% full proof of what He actually looked like until we see Him for ourselves.
Scientists have been studying the shroud for over 30 years and they cannot conclude what formed the image on the shroud. Its not a painting or a photograph.
If we are honest we have to come to the obvious conclusion. The Bible accounts are reliable.
@amstellori Hahahahahahahaha, based on THIS? There is literally no evidence for ANYTHING in the bible. Mainly because it is man written gibberish trying to explain things we don't understand.
@amstellori There is no evidence it is this poxy "Jesus of Nazareth". So we believe a picture of a random guy from a similarish era? God's a joke and religion too.
@RocknRollRules3 Since you don't believe in God, what are you even doing on this channel? What a joke!
Let those that believe exercise their rights. You have offered nothing at all of substance but that shouldn't surprise us as you are an atheist, who believes in nothing.
@amstellori So I'm not allowed to view a video because I'm not religious? Hmm. I assume you'd love to see society segregated with non believers cast out ;)
@RocknRollRules3 Like I said you have acted like a typical atheist, you've offered nothing, apart from hurling insults at believers. If you'd said anything of value then there would be no issue.
p.s. don't assume what kind of society I would like.
@amstellori And you acting like a typical god worshiper rewriting history ;) Where did I hurl insults? I think I've offered my opinions on the fact I'm surprised religion has perpetuated this long when it goes against everything we use to accept things as real (evidence) and no one seems to have been able to argue against that. Mostly because 'God' is no more real than Santa Claus who brought me some lovely gifts last week ;)
@amstellori scientists go where the "TWISTED EVIDENCE" leads them to conform to the true facts they want us to know hiding and filtering the REAL EVIDENCE
@rabisrabis man you are so bitter. can you handle the truth? the jewish community will be devastated when they come to realize that Jesus Christ is their messiah.
@Smokesomeweed76 If you get into some reading you would probably realize that all the facts point that it isn’t a fake. The scourge marks on the body exactly match the size of a Roman whip, the burial is consistent with ancient Jewish customs, the body images are medically accurate, it is proved that the image isn’t a painting and the radiocarbon analysis was flawed, as it used medieval repair fragments. I am not implying that it is the burial cloth of Jesus, but it is unlikely that it is fake.
And I also think the shroud was made from a man in the 13th or 14th century. They caught some poor fellow, beat the crap out of him, wrapped in a cloth, got the impression and called it the Shroud of Turin with Jesus image on it. Why isn't that possibility considered by these geniuses?
@kalyansubramani why on earth would someone beat up a guy just to create a persuasive artifact. Is it not a stretch to imply that a crafter of fake relics would use newly crucified man to achieve medically accuratee realism? Couldn't they just make a plausibly looking painting instead? Is there any of evidence, any record, that people were crucified in the Middle Ages to make relics? and who is 'they' in the first place? Sorry bro, but your logic doesn't make sense.
@kalyansubramani Because if you had been watching, they were able to retrace it back to being from the time of Christ. That doesn't mean that it is Christ, but the characteristics of how the person was beaten strongly point to it possibly being Him.
this whole this is complete BS. If the carbon 14 dating in 1988 was inaccurate because the sample drawn was contaminated, why don't they do the same again from a more reliable sample now? And the final re-construction with an artist's rendition completely distorts everything. why bother with all the 3D mumbo jumbo. you might has well called the artist first and saved six months work. Cant believe I wasted 1 hour 27 minutes of my life on this bull shit!
If jesus doesnt exist back then and he came out today. He probably end up in hispital accused of having some sort of mental sickness. Either way, i believe he's a good man. :)
what if jesus wasnt born two thousand years ago,and all history is a lie,re-written by the church, and jesus was around in the 13th century ? the shroud is real, not our history as it is told? jesus passed through the cloth.
what if jesus wasnt born two thousand years ago,and all history is a lie,re-written by the church, and jesus was around in the 13th century ? the shroud is real, not our history as it is told?
Ask Jesus to come into ur heart and save u, u must understand that this is ours lords true face, I believe why can't u ppl believe, there is no other way, if u don't believe u will banished for 7 years of pain, ever scence I asked Jesus to forgive me, my whole live really changed. BELIEVE
@Arulraj89 One is saved by Faith, but Faith is not meant to be blind. We are called to be able to give an answer for the reason of the hope this in us (1 Peter 3:15).
everybody is entitled to their opinion regardless of faith....whatever the mystery of the shroud..whether you believe it or not there was Jesus rose from the dead..Finally.He was scientifically revealed...reveal it also to yourself...
@DarkShonobi You don't know that. I'm pretty sure they did their research to get it right. If you have any Jewish friends you should know that this complexion is correct.
@donteatthekalanchoe that's exactly what i remember from the Gospel. Anyway, we watched this in religion class last year and our teacher stopped it right when they were about to reveal His face. It finaly drove me insane and i had to find out! So here i am now, dog tired at around 1:50am! It was worth it...that was amazing.
the good novel is that Real love cannot be defeated either by evil of human beings, or by death, and that every one of us have the opprtunity to make this love living in own life. That's the beginning of light.
This knowledge of the Shroud of Turin was given to us at the end of the 19th century, just when our Faith would be harshly challenged. There are, of course, many who wish to hide the proof. Think of what it really means!
The " cloth strips" are mentioned in the full documentary, not this abbreviated version. Watch it to find out. Nevertheless, some men are of such bad will that nothing will get them to believe in Jesus Christ- the second Person of the Holy Trinity-God Incarnate, the Son of God. They persist in their unbelief and reject Gods great Mercy. How evil. Soon one knows that even prayer will not help them to convert.
wow, I really hate what the History Channel produces, they always lie somewhere...at the 1:13:10 point you will hear a lie that John entered the tomb, saw the burial cloths and believed his master had risen....anyhow the gospel of John actually says - paraphrasing from John chapt. 20 verses 2-10 - that John arrived first, but doesn't enter until Peter arrived & went in, and they believed (Mary's story) "For as yet they knew not the scripture, that he must rise again from the dead." (quote v. 9)
This documentary is brilliant , however , i have seen another documentary on how the shroud may have been faked , basically it would be like brass rubbing.. it was recreated on this documentary and looked very very similar to the shroud
In an age where science and man kind are working feverishly to discredit our God and Maker, I applaud its use in attempting to prove, and stand behind Christ Jesus. Our Lord said that even Rocks would speak.... so why not a shroud.. in favour of nudging some people from death to life. Bravo...
What an excellent documentary (thanks Kate!) I don't know about the veracity of the shroud, but the evidence here is compelling. As a believer I do not need the shroud to back my faith... but as stated here...and many people, as did Thomas, have the opportunity to place their hands into His nail wounds, and be not faithless but believe.
Be cautious with the above, it's not scriptural. Jewish burial customs usually involved 'strips' of linen and a 'separate' burial cloth around the head. ( cf. John 11:43-44 )
"And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself." - John 20:7
@WiseDesire "Be cautious with the above, it's not scriptural." Sorry, you're wrong. The Sudarium (aka "veronika's veil", of the Latin word Vera, meaning truth, and Greek Icon meaning "image" - there really is no woman named Veronica who wiped the face of Jesus, just uneducated Christians. The person of Veronica is not scriptural) and the shroud of turin = 2 cloths = "linen cloths" of John 19.40 & 20.7
@donteatthekalanchoe Check out the book "A Doctor At Calvary". Surgeon Pierre Barbet, from a trained surgeons eye, tells the story of Jesus' torture and crucifixion through his examination of the Shroud Of Turin. It is a very horrifying book. Pilate really tortured Jesus so much hoping the Jews would be satisfied with that & back off the "kill him" thing.
@donteatthekalanchoe Who said anything about a woman named Veronica?.. =) The shroud is not scriptural. Sorry. Believe it if you feel you must but I choose that I will not. Just another sign and miracle of the god of this age.
@WiseDesire "Strips" of linen is more an interpretation than a direct translation. Regarding the napkin around the head, are you familiar with the Sudarium of Oviedo, which purportedly IS said cloth and is seen by those who believe in its authenticity to go in tandem with the Shroud? The idea is that the Sudarium was used to cover/towel up Christ's head while he was taken down from the cross and moved, then removed before the Shroud was draped over his body.
its a European face.
blackhawck70 4 minutes ago
Conclusions
The results of radiocarbon measurements at Arizona, Oxford and Zurich yield a calibrated calendar age range with at least 95% confidence for the linen of the Shroud of Turin of AD 1260 - 1390 (rounded down/up to nearest 10 yr). These results therefore provide conclusive evidence that the linen of the Shroud of Turin is mediaeval.
The results for the three control samples agree well with previous radiocarbon measurements and/or historical dates.
Its not Jesus you idiots.
WozOakley 3 days ago
They use a VP8 Image Analyzer, a special computer that makes topographical maps of the moon, and OTHER heavenly bodies lol @1:27:50
18wheelerzdavid 6 days ago
i can see jesus's face coming out of my ass... HAHAHAHAHAHA
ilovehash100 1 week ago
Well, those were violent times. They could've had faked a Crucifixion with some unlucky chap and then created the shroud out of a real dead body. Though I think people wouldn't know that Jesus time's crucifixion would have the nails at the wrist. Anyway, a very cool mystery. And btw I am christian, but I would like more evidence before accepting it as authentic.
gre8 1 week ago
AMEN! AND AMEN!
navycop73 1 week ago in playlist Christmas Songs
is not leonardo.
Perktube1 1 week ago
THATS LEONARDO PPL
TheHirushja 2 weeks ago
ok idk know but i got scared on this part ... lyk if someone didnt want me 2 know wat this meant 1:09:45
DariusVlogz 2 weeks ago
@DariusVlogz the time is 1:09:45
DariusVlogz 2 weeks ago
Jesus Christ Our Savior Leaves a PROOF of his face and telling us a message how he really loves us for everyone can see his pain on that shroud. Jesus Christ saves us from our sins that's the TRUE message of that shroud of Turin nothing more. To our God be the Glory in the Mighty name of Jesus Christ our Savior Amen.
SuperSesey 2 weeks ago 3
@SuperSesey its NOT jesus!!! its based on someone leonardo da vinci knew. if you line up the faces, everything is symetrical, just like the mona lisa was based on da vinci himself! this was on TV last night
katyperrygagagirl 2 days ago
yall forgot he was black
PUFFEDUPUSS 2 weeks ago
@PUFFEDUPUSS ...what????...The Jews in the time of Jesus were not black...darker skinned, yes, but not black
ImJstMe1 1 week ago
This isnt jesus you should know this
Gpilot071 2 weeks ago
@Gpilot071 then who do you think it is
DariusVlogz 2 weeks ago
@Gpilot071 true that is Leonardo
TheHirushja 2 weeks ago
damm catholics
gerryboy101 3 weeks ago
Did anyone noticed how Jim Caviziel actually looks alike with what they've accomplished here?
jajaPINOY 3 weeks ago
@jajaPINOY yeah..its creepy..:P
davycrocketful 3 weeks ago
@jajaPINOY yes i do believe this is the son of GOD JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD AND SAVER AMEN JESUS WANTS EVERONE TO KNOW WHAT HE DID FOR MANKIND AMEN GOD BLESS ALL
JesusLorloves 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
jajaPINOY 3 weeks ago
My grand father was a minister, and a very popular one not given to fetishes or different molestations. This shroud has as much to do with Jesus as my dirty laundry. Do your homework on this one folks. You are learning how to waste your God given life listening to this bunk about a 'sacred shroud'. Please stop and know the Lord would have it so that you did find something better to do with your lives.
howardtlewisiiiify 3 weeks ago
You can't just tell people that they have never seen jesus/god , my mom had the same encounter , and it is possible . Some people are just lucky enough to get a glimpse of the son of god .
varhanzboo 4 weeks ago
This is Irritating me , because i CAN'T SEE THE IMAGE THEIR TALKING ABOUT ON THE SHROUD :(
varhanzboo 4 weeks ago
I believe in a man called Jesus, I believe he came here to save us, I have faith in that and I'm great full for what he did.
However I do not have a mind strong enough to ever imagine that their is a god.. I don't mean to offend anyone but in the world we live in where we see INNOCENT people die every day and INNOCENT people struggle to cope with their surroundings I couldn't grasp the idea of a God. I value each and every persons beliefs and wish you all happiness from your faith.
PhilthyRemixes 1 month ago
I believe in Jesus and God, Because I have faith I value every prayer every time I pray, Even though I cant see him, touch him, But I can feel him!
themanwithabrian 1 month ago
Praise Jesus! My Lord and my God!
tieppol 1 month ago 2
25,000th viewer!!!! :D
DengaHD 1 month ago
thank you for this 1h30 documentary
3DFULLHD 1 month ago
Wow! If that is the real face of Christ, then Jim Caviezel looks pretty much EXACTLY like the Lord in The Passion of the Christ. Proving once again that that film is the closet thing we will ever have to being there.
PJ2040 1 month ago
awesome vid. and if shroud is real then all u non believers are doomed:)lol
artenm85 1 month ago
carbon dating is shit! another hoax to promote politicians and power holders.why not burn the asses of this information suppressors.
rabisrabis 1 month ago
what the hell trying to make important what atheists are.
rabisrabis 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When you know all the details on the shroud and how they match the biblical account and how the shroud cannot be duplicated and its images could not have been created by human hands with the technology available hundreds of years ago, the case becomes overwhelming that the shroud is authentic.
Markus77x7 1 month ago
Comment removed
Markus77x7 1 month ago
Why is date so importan?
Lilycha100 1 month ago
Well jesus was jew :D
Lilycha100 1 month ago
shroud of Turin is one of the greatest artistic work of leonardo davinci
curiousgalaxy1 1 month ago
@curiousgalaxy1 .. thanks for that sherlock :0)
doubts 1 month ago
@curiousgalaxy1 That would truly be a miracle because verifiable date of turin shroud pre-dates da Vinci by over 100 years
amstellori 1 month ago
i see this is all about the image...Why is he not what the books says? More lies made by ego minded men....
nujiss 1 month ago
please can anyone tell me how to download the Arabic caption for this amazing video
22700199 2 months ago
it IS possible, that the shroud is a photograph. read nicholas allen.
mksayer 2 months ago
The shroud is real and has proven to be produced buy a supernatural effect
BluesHarp60 2 months ago
If only we had a picture of Jesus to compare with the shroud. Lol religious retards!
LeeMcLoughlin1975 2 months ago
@LeeMcLoughlin1975 Please don't make us other atheists look bad.
zeroslashj 1 month ago
@LeeMcLoughlin1975 .. no need
doubts 1 month ago
awesome its like assassins creed a message from the past epic
staredeath101 2 months ago
LOL THEY CLAIM THAT THEY`RE USING THE MOST ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
BUT I`VE SEEN THERE WINDOWS 2000 HAHAHAHA
lawliet0413 2 months ago
@lawliet0413 ... windows 2000 is probably better than 7.
doubts 2 months ago
@doubts Not necessarily. In terms of software, there's little difference between 2000 and 7. The reason for this is because the program they used to render the model was likely older, and therefore no conversion to 7 was needed. Source: programmer.
zeroslashj 1 month ago
@doubts grow up
lawliet0413 1 month ago
I CAME HERE NOT TO WATCH BUT TO TELL YOU ALL:
I DONT KNOW IF YOU DONT CARE . .
BUT I WILL SEE JESUS CHRIST WHEN I AM IN HEAVEN,
I DONT NEED SCIENCE,,,,
JUST SAYING ^ ^ PEACE !
lawliet0413 2 months ago
New evidence suggests the Turin Shroud was a source of inspiration for Elgar’s ‘Enigma’ Variations. The timing is right because Secondo Pia’s famous photographic negative became an international sensation five months before Elgar began work on the Variations. To learn more about the multiple connections between the Turin Shroud and the ‘Enigma’ Variations, visit enigmathemeunmasked.blogspot.com/2011/06/links-between-enigma-variations-and.html
Sirpadgett 2 months ago
@modernrocks , in what way have you studied this for years ? what research have you done ?
Jrld11 2 months ago
I have seen the only Begotten, and he does not look like they depict him. The labor of their endeavors proves that their yoke is not light, and they do not know God.
StarApostle 2 months ago
I believe in jesus , i am skeptical about this though..its a great documentary..it would interesting to know if this sort of crucifixion happened to others aswell as jesus ie crown of thorns , or something else on a persons head , and piercing of the side ? i should imagine that would be common to ensure the victim is def dead ?
Jrld11 2 months ago
@Jrld11 Beyond a reasonable doubt this is burial shroud of Christ for the following reasons.
1) made of fine linen. crucified criminals were not buried in fine linen.
2) of a man crucified and scourged. both punishments together unusual.
3) legs are not broken, very unusual.
4) chest wound, again unusual.
5) crown of thorns, Unique.
6) image on the cloth, Unique.
7) All of the above recorded in the Bible.
If one still has major doubts, then no amount of evidence will suffice.
amstellori 2 months ago 11
@amstellori i beileve that this the son of GOD JESUS CHRIST AMEN I PRAY THAT MANKIND WOOD BEILEVE NOW IN JESUS NAME AMEN GOD BLESS YOU
JesusLorloves 1 month ago 2
@amstellori fucking clown.
MrProtuber 4 weeks ago
@MrProtuber seems we have another atheist, again a comment of zero value.
amstellori 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
MrProtuber 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@amstellori sorry but even the most feared theist intelectual won't use this argument in any debate because it would look like a fool. What u watching here is mainstream pseudo history. btw I need to be an atheist do disbelief in this shroud bullshit?
MrProtuber 4 weeks ago
@amstellori The New Testament itself refutes the authenticity of the Turin Shroud. John 20:6 says it wasn't made of one piece. Specifically that there was a different piece of linen that covered the head. Three independent labs, in Arizona, Zurich and Oxford, were each given four samples, making 12 datings in all. The dates varied within expected margins of error, but all put the linen as younger than 600 AD. what more you want?
MrProtuber 4 weeks ago
@amstellori just in case you need more, cause there is so much evidence against this bullshit...
MrProtuber 4 weeks ago
@amstellori But i guess Factual evidence is of no importance to people of faith. So am just wasting time here.
MrProtuber 4 weeks ago
@amstellori And to add to this list, although in this doc it did not mention it, but the shroud contains remains of flowers, consistent with first century Jerusalem area, that were placed alongside the body.
TheHelo10 2 weeks ago
@TheHelo10 Yes your rite and the doc does mention it.
navycop73 1 week ago in playlist Christmas Songs
@Jrld11 Hi i studied this al for years, No one other than Christ (Yahushua Commonly called jesus) was ever recorded as having a crown of thorns, its unique. The lance in the side is also unique, the scurging was normal for very evil criminals. The common way to check death was to break the legs so any strengtyh and or breath was gone from the victim. The shroud is not essential if you believe, but it is really him bro.
modernrocks 2 months ago 2
There are multiple questions to be asked about the shroud:
1.) Does it date to the right era of the supposed Christ? Yes/no?
If Yes:
2.) How do we know that the Shroud is from the the burial of Christ? Furthermore how do we know that face, is the face of Christ?
Don't fill in the blanks with what your religion wants you to believe, think for yourself.
Relics are BIG BUSINESS for the church, always have been, just like miracles, indulgences/pardons and curses.
ccheng21 2 months ago
I've never taken anything in the bible literally. I wouldn't say I'm an athiest, but I think a lot of it was intended to be open to enterpritation. Science has always focused on fact. And I've always been curious in anything that's unexplained. I really like how this was a new revealing breakthrough for both science AND christianity. Very interesting!
U2fan24 2 months ago
The man in the shroud has a bigger nose than the computer re-creation. No reason for the animators to make Jesus look like a gentile. In fact, the image on the cloth has a distinctly ethnic Jewish face. Jesus was a Jew and any re-creations of His image should reflect that He was a Jew. His real name is Yeshua.
Markus77x7 2 months ago
This piece is so biased it's not even funny. The shroud is mysterious and will continue to be, but this program is so poorly done that I just have to laugh.
chamuda610 2 months ago
why are there so many paintings, photos, videos, and other stuff that show Jesus as being pierced in the right part of the rib cage and the blood on the linen is on the left side...
mat31new 2 months ago
@mat31new You need to remember that the Shroud of Turin is not a painting or illustration, but an imprint; it shows what is essentially a mirror image of the man it contained. If you use fingerpaint to make a pair of handprints on a sheet of paper, then stand back and look at them as though they were a "drawing" of two hands instead of an impression, then the imprint you made with your left hand will look like a right hand and vice versa.
TrentSteeele 2 months ago 2
Comment removed
mat31new 2 months ago
Comment removed
mat31new 2 months ago
@TrentSteeele aha, i get it. they showed the inside of the shroud.
mat31new 2 months ago
@mat31new Tell me friend, where in the Bible does it say that He was pierced on the right side?? The reason we view it being done on His right-hand sign, is because most of the world is right handed, so we like to think that He was stabbed on that side.
pogorules15 2 months ago
@pogorules15 i did not say that he was pierced in the right side. i was questioning why the pictures show him pierced in the right side while the shroud had blood in the left side, and the left side seems more relevant because its the side where the heart is and if the centurion was right handed he would've pierced Jesus in the left side. but, as @TrentSteeele said, the shroud is an imprint, therefore, the left part of the shroud is Jesus' right rib.
mat31new 2 months ago
One Gospel author mentions the single cloth that wrapped the body of Jesus as it was taken down from the cross. Another Gospel mentioned the burial cloths left semi-wrapped--one for the face and one for the body. What happened to Joseph of Arimathea's single cloth? It clearly wasn't taken to the tomb. It also wasn't a burial cloth. Who knows.
anebturia 2 months ago
@anebturia The cloth that was used for his head is in italy. It is one of the pieces that supports the Turin to be authentic because the blood in the head wrap matches the marks/stains with in the turin.
hybridwhat 2 months ago
@hybridwhat i meant spain...
hybridwhat 2 months ago
@hybridwhat Oviedo, Spain, to be precise.
TrentSteeele 2 months ago
I do believe that our creator had a purpose in allowing this cloth to survive over 2000 years, for this end time generation, I can only speculate as to why?, but if you look at all the fact's on this shroud, there is far more proof that this is the actuall face of Jesus Christ, than not.
I think it's God's kindness and love for us to provide us with proof when he want's us to have faith in him without seeing but out of love for us he still gives us tangable proof.
Jack
jackm3r 2 months ago 2
Forensic analysts reckon the blood on ths Shroud of Turin is Type AB. If the Shroud of Turin does convey an actual image of Jesus, and the Shroud is so close to being authentic that its not funny, then Jesus of Nazareth had Type AB blood. To cut a long story short, considered opinion ascertains that the Shroud, being what it is, is totally beyond the capacities of anyone at all to have forged it. Crease lines above and below the head also appear on at least one portrait done in the 6th Century.
Richardhedditch261 2 months ago
To more clearly see the image on the cloth,it is better that it be observed farther away..
The closer one is to the cloth the less clear it is... A bit like using mud be make a blind man see?
jiwbink 2 months ago
People My brother saw Jesus in real. He had an encounter with God. He saw his face. And he said Jesus looked exactly like the Jesus they have shown here
vknarik 2 months ago
@vknarik please stop the maddness, even Moses could notlook upon the face of G-d the almighty. No one and i mean not one person in this day and time knows what the man yashua because there were no J's in the language back then ,son of Mary looks like.
MrALAMIN73 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrALAMIN73 I have said what I have heard and I know that my brother is not lying. Its upto you to beleive it or not!
vknarik 2 months ago
@vknarik Is that so? Well did your brother who saw Jesus realize that this model isn't correct either. Jesus was NOT caucasian, as depicted here.
pogorules15 2 months ago
@pogorules15 I have said what I have heard and I know that my brother is not lying. Its upto you to beleive it or not!
vknarik 2 months ago
@pogorules15 How do you know Jesus was not Caucasian? We don't know Jesus' skin color, and I don't believe it's of any importance.
zeroslashj 1 month ago
@zeroslashj You are not an atheist. You must think I'm stupid!
LeeMcLoughlin1975 1 month ago
@LeeMcLoughlin1975 Yes, I am an atheist. Who are you to tell me who I am or am not? :|
zeroslashj 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zeroslashj "How do you know Jesus was not Caucasian? We don't know Jesus' skin color, and I don't believe it's of any importance."
You're so retarted, you think a caucasian is someone with white skin. The whole of North Africa and the whole of the Indian subcontinent is native home to caucasians and they are dark skinned.
LeeMcLoughlin1975 1 month ago
@LeeMcLoughlin1975 I may be "retarted," but at the very least I can spell correctly. Idiot.
zeroslashj 1 month ago
@zeroslashj HE WAS BORN IN PALESTINE! Of course he wasn't caucasian!
pogorules15 1 month ago
@pogorules15 And of what importance is that?
zeroslashj 1 month ago
@zeroslashj Do you know where Palestine is? It's directly north of Israel. Israel is right on the equator, and everyone who has ever lived near or on the equator has always been darker skinned. Use your head, he couldn't have been caucasian. Had his parents been American or European, then yes, he would have more then likely been white. But they weren't. All I'm saying is that the image depicted here can't be 100% correct. I'm not trying to argue with anyone, I'm just being logical
pogorules15 1 month ago
@pogorules15 Yes, logically he would have not been Caucasian, but we're talking about a demigod here. Not only that, Jesus has been depicted in numerous ways beyond just Caucasian, including Asian and African, thereby making Jesus a more personal figure rather than one you can absolutely pinpoint.
And no image can be 100% correct. That's just my two cents.
zeroslashj 1 month ago
@zeroslashj I completely agree with you that He is more of a personalized figure, but you have to realize that he was more then likely to be what we would describe as a "typical Arab." We also know that He spoke Aramaic, so He had to have been of that "race". But I do agree that we can never have 100% full proof of what He actually looked like until we see Him for ourselves.
pogorules15 1 month ago
Awesome!
Scientists go where the evidence leads them.
Scientists have been studying the shroud for over 30 years and they cannot conclude what formed the image on the shroud. Its not a painting or a photograph.
If we are honest we have to come to the obvious conclusion. The Bible accounts are reliable.
amstellori 3 months ago 14
@amstellori Hahahahahahahaha, based on THIS? There is literally no evidence for ANYTHING in the bible. Mainly because it is man written gibberish trying to explain things we don't understand.
RocknRollRules3 2 months ago
@amstellori There is no evidence it is this poxy "Jesus of Nazareth". So we believe a picture of a random guy from a similarish era? God's a joke and religion too.
RocknRollRules3 2 months ago
@RocknRollRules3 Since you don't believe in God, what are you even doing on this channel? What a joke!
Let those that believe exercise their rights. You have offered nothing at all of substance but that shouldn't surprise us as you are an atheist, who believes in nothing.
amstellori 2 months ago 6
@amstellori So I'm not allowed to view a video because I'm not religious? Hmm. I assume you'd love to see society segregated with non believers cast out ;)
glass houses...
RocknRollRules3 2 months ago
@RocknRollRules3 Like I said you have acted like a typical atheist, you've offered nothing, apart from hurling insults at believers. If you'd said anything of value then there would be no issue.
p.s. don't assume what kind of society I would like.
amstellori 2 months ago
@amstellori And you acting like a typical god worshiper rewriting history ;) Where did I hurl insults? I think I've offered my opinions on the fact I'm surprised religion has perpetuated this long when it goes against everything we use to accept things as real (evidence) and no one seems to have been able to argue against that. Mostly because 'God' is no more real than Santa Claus who brought me some lovely gifts last week ;)
RocknRollRules3 2 months ago
@amstellori I'm an atheist, and I found this to be very interesting and educational. Don't assume this is typical atheist behavior please.
zeroslashj 1 month ago
@amstellori scientists go where the "TWISTED EVIDENCE" leads them to conform to the true facts they want us to know hiding and filtering the REAL EVIDENCE
rabisrabis 1 month ago
@rabisrabis man you are so bitter. can you handle the truth? the jewish community will be devastated when they come to realize that Jesus Christ is their messiah.
amstellori 1 month ago
Time to wake up and smell the fake! Yes It´s a fake. Why dont god just tell us that he is real instead of giving us a dirty sheet?
Smokesomeweed76 3 months ago
@Smokesomeweed76 If you get into some reading you would probably realize that all the facts point that it isn’t a fake. The scourge marks on the body exactly match the size of a Roman whip, the burial is consistent with ancient Jewish customs, the body images are medically accurate, it is proved that the image isn’t a painting and the radiocarbon analysis was flawed, as it used medieval repair fragments. I am not implying that it is the burial cloth of Jesus, but it is unlikely that it is fake.
mutdfan92 3 months ago
it is not just human blood it's the blood of the Messiah
"i am the light the truth and the way" john 14:6
this light from the resurrection made the shroud
kimura2Loc 3 months ago
Comment removed
kimura2Loc 3 months ago
And I also think the shroud was made from a man in the 13th or 14th century. They caught some poor fellow, beat the crap out of him, wrapped in a cloth, got the impression and called it the Shroud of Turin with Jesus image on it. Why isn't that possibility considered by these geniuses?
kalyansubramani 3 months ago
Comment removed
mutdfan92 3 months ago
Comment removed
mutdfan92 3 months ago
@kalyansubramani why on earth would someone beat up a guy just to create a persuasive artifact. Is it not a stretch to imply that a crafter of fake relics would use newly crucified man to achieve medically accuratee realism? Couldn't they just make a plausibly looking painting instead? Is there any of evidence, any record, that people were crucified in the Middle Ages to make relics? and who is 'they' in the first place? Sorry bro, but your logic doesn't make sense.
mutdfan92 3 months ago 8
@kalyansubramani Because if you had been watching, they were able to retrace it back to being from the time of Christ. That doesn't mean that it is Christ, but the characteristics of how the person was beaten strongly point to it possibly being Him.
BreathOFLaminin 3 months ago in playlist Signature of God
@kalyansubramani Thing is, there are paintings of the shroud before 13-14 century.
hybridwhat 2 months ago
this whole this is complete BS. If the carbon 14 dating in 1988 was inaccurate because the sample drawn was contaminated, why don't they do the same again from a more reliable sample now? And the final re-construction with an artist's rendition completely distorts everything. why bother with all the 3D mumbo jumbo. you might has well called the artist first and saved six months work. Cant believe I wasted 1 hour 27 minutes of my life on this bull shit!
kalyansubramani 3 months ago
If jesus doesnt exist back then and he came out today. He probably end up in hispital accused of having some sort of mental sickness. Either way, i believe he's a good man. :)
11ledzepp 3 months ago 2
what if jesus wasnt born two thousand years ago,and all history is a lie,re-written by the church, and jesus was around in the 13th century ? the shroud is real, not our history as it is told? jesus passed through the cloth.
billyboyrocka1 3 months ago
what if jesus wasnt born two thousand years ago,and all history is a lie,re-written by the church, and jesus was around in the 13th century ? the shroud is real, not our history as it is told?
billyboyrocka1 3 months ago
what if jesus wasnt born two thousand years ago,and all history is a lie,re-written by the church, and jesus was around in the 13th century ?
billyboyrocka1 3 months ago
Guys all of what's happening in our world has a purpose. Lets uaw believe god let us believe the lord. He is good
tanabuel 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE LORD IS SPEAKING TODAY! HEAR THE WORD OF THE LORD SPOKEN TO THIS FINAL GENERATION!
Trumpetcallofgodonline,com
Most important website on the internet! 1,013,979 views already!
"ADONAI, God, does nothing without revealing his plan to his servants the prophets." ~ Amos 3:7
pedrolevy3 4 months ago
Ask Jesus to come into ur heart and save u, u must understand that this is ours lords true face, I believe why can't u ppl believe, there is no other way, if u don't believe u will banished for 7 years of pain, ever scence I asked Jesus to forgive me, my whole live really changed. BELIEVE
astroby0101 4 months ago
how many prove do you guys need??? he is alive he is the truth,,,
Arulraj89 4 months ago
@Arulraj89 One is saved by Faith, but Faith is not meant to be blind. We are called to be able to give an answer for the reason of the hope this in us (1 Peter 3:15).
BreathOFLaminin 4 months ago
@traceymedia1 really?
matthewVancouver 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The problem is that the shroud of Turin is simply FAKE
Giovannisenzaterra 4 months ago
everybody is entitled to their opinion regardless of faith....whatever the mystery of the shroud..whether you believe it or not there was Jesus rose from the dead..Finally.He was scientifically revealed...reveal it also to yourself...
chrisfox057 4 months ago
I guess this is a message that is pass on to us 2011 years ago ei O.o
staredeath101 5 months ago
Jesus was a lot darker in skin tone.
DarkShonobi 5 months ago
@DarkShonobi You don't know that. I'm pretty sure they did their research to get it right. If you have any Jewish friends you should know that this complexion is correct.
DarkSwan641 3 months ago
@DarkSwan641 okay.
DarkShonobi 3 months ago
@donteatthekalanchoe that's exactly what i remember from the Gospel. Anyway, we watched this in religion class last year and our teacher stopped it right when they were about to reveal His face. It finaly drove me insane and i had to find out! So here i am now, dog tired at around 1:50am! It was worth it...that was amazing.
businessmonkey13 6 months ago
the good novel is that Real love cannot be defeated either by evil of human beings, or by death, and that every one of us have the opprtunity to make this love living in own life. That's the beginning of light.
Sirrom5 6 months ago
Comment removed
nicksum29 6 months ago
This knowledge of the Shroud of Turin was given to us at the end of the 19th century, just when our Faith would be harshly challenged. There are, of course, many who wish to hide the proof. Think of what it really means!
IsMackinac 6 months ago
The " cloth strips" are mentioned in the full documentary, not this abbreviated version. Watch it to find out. Nevertheless, some men are of such bad will that nothing will get them to believe in Jesus Christ- the second Person of the Holy Trinity-God Incarnate, the Son of God. They persist in their unbelief and reject Gods great Mercy. How evil. Soon one knows that even prayer will not help them to convert.
THEJET52 6 months ago
wow, I really hate what the History Channel produces, they always lie somewhere...at the 1:13:10 point you will hear a lie that John entered the tomb, saw the burial cloths and believed his master had risen....anyhow the gospel of John actually says - paraphrasing from John chapt. 20 verses 2-10 - that John arrived first, but doesn't enter until Peter arrived & went in, and they believed (Mary's story) "For as yet they knew not the scripture, that he must rise again from the dead." (quote v. 9)
donteatthekalanchoe 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This documentary is brilliant , however , i have seen another documentary on how the shroud may have been faked , basically it would be like brass rubbing.. it was recreated on this documentary and looked very very similar to the shroud
Jrld11 6 months ago
this is wonderful!
fuckermother187 6 months ago
In an age where science and man kind are working feverishly to discredit our God and Maker, I applaud its use in attempting to prove, and stand behind Christ Jesus. Our Lord said that even Rocks would speak.... so why not a shroud.. in favour of nudging some people from death to life. Bravo...
natalianegritto 6 months ago
What an excellent documentary (thanks Kate!) I don't know about the veracity of the shroud, but the evidence here is compelling. As a believer I do not need the shroud to back my faith... but as stated here...and many people, as did Thomas, have the opportunity to place their hands into His nail wounds, and be not faithless but believe.
natalianegritto 6 months ago
If the Shroud of Turin is fake, then why are these people examining it's authenticity? That means it's true beyond any doubt...
SorianoYuri 6 months ago
Jesus never died to begin with.
He was risen to heaven and will come back down soon.
This face is the face of a nomad from the time.
MrGrandDragon 6 months ago
Be cautious with the above, it's not scriptural. Jewish burial customs usually involved 'strips' of linen and a 'separate' burial cloth around the head. ( cf. John 11:43-44 )
"And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself." - John 20:7
WiseDesire 6 months ago
Comment removed
donteatthekalanchoe 6 months ago
@WiseDesire "Be cautious with the above, it's not scriptural." Sorry, you're wrong. The Sudarium (aka "veronika's veil", of the Latin word Vera, meaning truth, and Greek Icon meaning "image" - there really is no woman named Veronica who wiped the face of Jesus, just uneducated Christians. The person of Veronica is not scriptural) and the shroud of turin = 2 cloths = "linen cloths" of John 19.40 & 20.7
donteatthekalanchoe 6 months ago
@donteatthekalanchoe Check out the book "A Doctor At Calvary". Surgeon Pierre Barbet, from a trained surgeons eye, tells the story of Jesus' torture and crucifixion through his examination of the Shroud Of Turin. It is a very horrifying book. Pilate really tortured Jesus so much hoping the Jews would be satisfied with that & back off the "kill him" thing.
donteatthekalanchoe 6 months ago
Comment removed
WiseDesire 6 months ago
Comment removed
WiseDesire 6 months ago
@donteatthekalanchoe Who said anything about a woman named Veronica?.. =) The shroud is not scriptural. Sorry. Believe it if you feel you must but I choose that I will not. Just another sign and miracle of the god of this age.
WiseDesire 6 months ago
Comment removed
IsMackinac 6 months ago
@IsMackinac Okay.
WiseDesire 6 months ago
@WiseDesire On the other hand, you may be right.
IsMackinac 6 months ago
@WiseDesire "Strips" of linen is more an interpretation than a direct translation. Regarding the napkin around the head, are you familiar with the Sudarium of Oviedo, which purportedly IS said cloth and is seen by those who believe in its authenticity to go in tandem with the Shroud? The idea is that the Sudarium was used to cover/towel up Christ's head while he was taken down from the cross and moved, then removed before the Shroud was draped over his body.
TrentSteeele 2 months ago