Overunity Mechanical Power Transmission

[subhankarkudghat]

This video is very important to me..I am very happy to watch..Thanks dear..

If you want to get Free Energy System to power your Home:

- Here is my advice for you:

-- There is a review of the current Magnetic Generators in the market

--- Go to Google and search for Top Magnet Generator

---- and.. Click the first results

[1crazyfocker]

BTW there is no such thing as US Patent 61/011,715, that is a patent application number. so right there that shows you are a lier. it is unlawful to say that an idea is patent pending or patented when it is not. now i do like your new idea. but your off to a bad start with the lies, but since i do have planetary gears laying around i can find out really fast if it works or not, and will post result to your videos.

[PowerMorse]

Power in = Power out + friction between gears and hubs, sorry not buying the overunity theory.

[Risenangelicaegis]

nice the Toyota Hybrid synergy drive Actually uses this concept :-)

[ailireruf]

No such patents exist, nor does it follow any patent numbering scheme. This gears violate laws of physics. In other words - total fail

[kuma982]

lol, big lack of knowlage in physic.

it would not increase power, only torque or speed.

[tubejhuncarl]

Calculate the output power with 100% rolling resistance or friction of the planetary gears with the reverse sun gear. The result will be no overunity, the output power equal to the input power (power=speed x torque). Now, according to physics, the rolling resistance or friction decreases during constant motion. This time, calculate again the output power with decreasing rolling friction down to zero rolling resistance. Use your knowledge in mathematics and you will be surprised!

[jewishcrimenetwork]

I have seen this arrengement in a lab at the university.

No increase in power but in rotational speed.

(No need to insult though)

[coppersmile]

Please go back to school and study Physics, before posting nonsense videos

[johapet]

Wow if you can make 350 out of 200 hp with one such unit, why not attach another unit? with the same 75 percent increase you would get 612.5 HP! And then annother one ... and another one! Limitless energy from a single motor! Genius!

You are not actually believing this nonsense, are you?

[ebutemetube]

I'm sure I've seen this in Toyota Prius lol

[hoverpal]

@tubejhuncarl

well, most viewers are right = no power enhancement

Nice animations anyway but no "overunity" and no extra power throu gearing, sorry ;) !!

[ETMHockey89]

This person is probably some poor little 4 year old somewhere in Malaysia and you guys are just shitting on him so hard :(

[altium1]

This will not overunity mechanism.

[pandksigns]

for all you ney sayers out there build one, i did and the dyno tests don't lie. Its only a 25% gain but it works. So put up or shut up.

[seansalvador1]

The overall energy will be decreased due to friction. You'd be better off with a rigid solid shaft (sounds much more sext too).

[AnthonyFloyd88]

Stupid! Power = Torque * Angular Speed!!! The planetary gearbox incrase the torque but reduce the angular speed! So, the product is CONSTANT!!! You are very stupid imho!!

[LiamXaoh]

What a bullshit video. No mechanical knowledge at all. No gearbox can produce over-unity. Nothing for free in this world.

A perpetual motion gearbox - when I thought I'd seen it all. If anyone gives this more than one star they need a doctor.

[macchesney]

this is just the device i was looking for to increase the power output of my turbo encabulator, thanks for posting.

[ALTFUELPROF]

You don't get something for nothing. What he is describing is how modern Toyota and Toyota clone hybrids function. The addition of an electric motor powering the sun gear allows to the mechanism to vary the input to output ratio infinately. This however takes energy from a battery to do. This concept was introduced in 195(7) by a GM engineer. To propose this perpetual motion idea as tubejhuncarl has, is Ignorant. The ouput is a result of input from the engine and the electric motor/battery.

[tommyrob326]

The whole principle of gearsets is that in order to increase speed or torque there is an inverse decrease of the other, thus if you increase the torque and decrease the speed or vise-versa, unless there is an additional power input it is not possible to "create" additional torque or speed at the output of the gearset.

[r8wing]

Your reasoning is botched. You can't increase both speed and torque only by using gears, when one goes up the other has to go down, and you still have those friction losses. Your idea may be good for some sort of planetary differential but not for any kind of energy amplifier.

[gorgot6]

I'm no physics professor. I'm barley into high school, but isn't this concept impossible. you cant get more energy that you put in because friction takes transfers energy away you cannot create more energy than is put into it because energy can only be transferred and even if you found a way to keep it going without reducing the power you could not create more... am i right here?

[pieas2009]

@gorgot6 yeap u r rite dear.

[pandksigns]

All of you who posted comments below were too quick to comment. I'm a sign-writer and saw this a year ago when it first came out. The inventor sent me details and I laser cut out of 10 mm acrylic and assembled to try and test and better visualize. Now you would think that increasing the torque and reducing the speed in the first stage, only to increase the speed and reduce the torque in the second stage is useless and futile. But look closely and you'll see he does something else.

[biopowergirl]

its funny very kindergarden mechanism of

gears in the overunity mechanical power transmission

[Traqr]

This isn't even non-Newtonian physics in action - there's no "zero-point energy" or "super-oscillating-magnetic-re­sonating-magic-bingo" claims to at least sound plausible. He's running a low gear into a high gear and expecting extra power. I'm surprised he bothered posting it after building the prototype - didn't that prove the concept of frictional losses enough?

[ogatobranco]

Even worse than connecting a alternator to an electric motor directly and say it produces more than it takes.... that on video is a planetary gear... it's not very diferent from a diferential .... (actually a diferential can be made with that geometry)

[rainwulf]

This is the first youtube comment i have ever written, and its just to say this, what a complete fucking idiot. There is no over unity here. What a moron. Where does he think the extra power comes from? What a crock of shit.

[myrmecia1977]

Shhhhh your not supposed to ask that question, just cough up your money for him to continue his "research" ;)

[gldwonder]

very estupid video

too basic concept took long time....silly

[waltgnz]

OK... Come on now,think about it.

[KAOSKTRL]

Silly, nice animation but just unsupported nonsense.

[UnderManiac]

I'd like to see you build it and find out that you didn't get the result you wanted.

Your power input to power output ratio is 1:1.

Power = speed x torque.

If you spin the blue hub in one direction or the other direction, the result is the same, an increase of speed, but a decrease in torque.

If you spin the red hub then you get a reduction in speed, but an increase in torque.

Simple mathematics.

[AClarke2007]

Who are we trying to fool here?

[sjh7132]

If you get more speed, you get less torque. If you get more torque you get less speed. If you try to do both, you end up the same (minus friction) Build it and you'll see.

[Cokoholicar]

HAHAHAHA, how did you even learn to animate ...

[gearheadroadracer]

take a physics class or two and learn how much you don't know about our world.

knowledge is power and you are very weak.

nice waste of time on the rediculous animation.

run a hose from your ass to your head...bingo, another perpetual motion machine!!!!

[shockolanu]

It's funny seeing US people talking about knowledge. To think that I saw MIT classes that teach physics that I learned in 6th grade... HAHAHA!

[fassterblade]

wow...so you got stupider as you got older..is that how it goes over there....pipe!

[fassterblade]

6th grade?....wow...so you got stupider as you got older?...is that it?...this cat might be a bit overzealous thinking this is new, but he did manage to put his his idea on wax...where is yours pipe?!

[shockolanu]

Get a life you stupid loser!

[mos3ad2006]

The power didn't change at all !!

Power = Torque X speed

So, when you increase the speed, you reduce the torque and vice versa and the power still constant (only if there is no losses)

Please rename this video. you can delete the word "Overunity"

[techadik1]

@mos3ad2006

Yeah I agree with you this is not an overunity. The power output of this setup is the same as the input. Same speed and torque..

[sspoke]

nothing new this was made in the 1940's its used in all car transmissions to create torque from the little engine that powers the car..

[afcouture]

Is this a thought experiment/youtube experiment or do you actually believe that you are creating energy from nothing? I could understand a claim that very high gear ratios were achieved, but increasing both torque and speed through a gear train is not possible. The patents you claim to have filed (on your website) are also impossible to find; not that a patent means something does what it claims anyway, but it would have been interesting to see what the actual claims being made were.

[jproberge]

thank you for your inspiring new design! It helped me to design a gearbox for a wind turbine. Thank you very much!

[UnderManiac]

The design is for a speed adapter. There is already one on the market. It's an adapter for a drill. It''s also an right angled adapter.

Put the drill on one shaft and the speed doubles, but the torque halves.

Put it on the other shaft and the speed is halved, but the torque doubles.

Old, old technology.

It's even in use in car transmissions.

[Apollo3001]

Hmm...Sorry, I misunderstood your design. However, I still have my doubts. I understand your mechanism but I do not believe the output torque will be greater that the input.

[Apollo3001]

(continued) However, this also would not work. If the torque is provided to the central gear of the first set (small blue one), this would cause the first planetary gears to spin idly, since they are not rigidly attached to the shaft.(in order for the sun gear to rotate, the blue planetary gear carrier must be fixed in the inertial frame of reference) Therefore, the torque would be distributed between the spinning planetary gears and partially between the yellow sun gear.

[Apollo3001]

This will not work. Take your engine example: if you provide angular acceleration to the blue shaft, you will be turning the central disk of the second planetary gear system, not the first. This is because the disk is rigidly fixed to the shaft. That, then, renders the whole system useless, since the torque would then be split between the freely spinning first gear set and red shaft. In order to get the effect you are looking for, you must spin the central gear of the first set... (continues)