Added: 2 years ago
From: bobbbennett
Views: 762
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (73)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It is very difficult to get people to look at the 911/WTC issue. I am east of Fresno in the Mtns. I don't have tv and I saw this on youtube. My friends have dish tv, it's on all the time they saw nothing and they don't want to know anything. And they aren't the only ones. I have a friend with a phd in vision and an excellent background.. He wont look at it. Phd and vision and he can't see this and he wont look at it. Verrry interesting.

  • Well, at least one of FEMA or NIST has to be wrong, as their reports do not concur.

  • Even the NIST report on WTC 7 states that the debris damage had no part in the building collapse other than to ignite the fires it says were "hundreds of degrees below those considered in practice for fire resistance ratings." Further, in 1975 and prior to installation of a sprinkler system, the north WTC tower was subject to a fire of at least 1500 degrees fahrenheit that caused ZERO damage to the trusses.

  • oh boo hoo...i haven't see a comment from you on here yet without insults...is this all you got pussy? Your innocent young age is your defense?...how about some REAL facts to back up that mouth?!!! I could care less that you have a girlfriend...what does that prove? ...Did I call you gay?...uh no...you called me a puff and a retard...both a bit polically incorrect don't you think?...why don't you stick to the subject...or is it that you don't have anything for us?

  • Look mommy a big grey airplane with NO windows and a bunch of wierd looking crap on its belly!!!!! DUHHHHHH by the way you might want to make sure you have little round things underneath your little dick while your at it...the media has already proven my case with their video...have fun proving otherwise...now it's time for you to put up or shut up....explain to us all what that was...we're waiting

  • Ya you mean the big grey jet with the big radome pod which is used in drones and other aircraft for such purposes as remote control? Why don't you look at the videos again genius? Did that look like a commercial airliner? DUH!!! And how you conveniently ignore all of the firemen who say they heard multiple EXPLOSIONS...You're a certified idiot!!! Need more proof dumbass?

  • Gaping holes up top with people standing in them waving for help -FACT

    Unignited chips of thermate FACT

    Witnesses claiming explosions before and after plane impacts FACT

    Buildings unstable after explosions FACT

    CALLS from plane passengers Bogus and proven FALSE by FBI FACT

    Buildings falling at freefall speed FACT

    You're an idiot!!!

  • 911 was an inside job

    do NOT vaccinate your kids OR pets

  • imprezajay

    You're a bozo - FACT!

    I know 'cuz it takes one to know one. heh heh

  • Videos Of Planes: Good

    Gaping Holes in Towers: Covered by smoke and fire and debris: Moderate

    Hundreds of eye witnesses: Good

    Airplane Debris: Can be Placed: Bad

    Calls from Passengers: Bad *Staged* If you look at the "Passengers" there were primarily U.S. Governmental Officials on those planes.

    Firemen and Engineers: Opinion, Not fact.

  • no thermite was found... what they found was the end product of reacted thermite, which just happens to be rust. see alex jones interview with niels herrit. there was no trace of the fuel or the oxidizer needed that would be thermite.  Alex asks a couple of times, and niels directly answers no.

  • This guy Richard Gage has been on TV and is only a second away from accusing the security company, we all know what he's saying there don't we Jed?, of being complicit in the events of the WTC on 9-11 and he hasn't been taken to court, as far as I know.

    The deafening silence of the previous administration speaks volumes.

    We are already in it. This thing, this event, this period of time, where certain people are trying to take control.

    Luckily, the sheep are throwing off their wool. :)

  • imprezajay, the only FACT that you can actually account for is that you were not there and can not actually account for those events. I said do "...all of the required research".

    You refuse to do anything other than regurgitate false media accounts of the events. We have all seen them, everyone has but you have to do research to understand what is physically possible versus what the television tells you what is real.

  • imprezajay, you have not done your homework.

    I'm giving you a BIG FAT F-!

    Do not bother responding until you have done all of the required research.

  • So a blunt object like a turbofan jet engine has the same capacity for penetrating steel and iron as an armor piercing bullet? Can an armour piercing bullet have pierced through the entire world trade center at all? We might never know but imprezajay does.

    Lets assume that blunt turbofan jet engines have armour piercing potential. What happened to the unscathed cement face of the pentagon with the American Airlines flight? How come the engines did not pentetrate the walls or leave marks?

  • imprezajay, imagine the results?? I can imagine me flying on the back of puff the magic dragon but that doesnt make it true or factual at all. Last i heard, armour is meant to prevent bullets from penetrating. Maybe you can rethink a better example for your argument but it doesnt seem like you are considering any knowledgable facts in your statements.

  • In all logic most likely exactly what the engineer in this video has explained so clearly and factually.

    So, try to pay attention and listen carefully unless you have similar qualifications and expertise, you should listen and learn from those who are educated in such matters and leave your opinions outside. My expertiese is in aviation as a former flight instructor for four years and a freight liner pilot.

  • @imnazhole (re: college refund) I know, right?

  • imprezajay, okay then, you are "informing" us that a jet engine can travel in a fraction of a second through a steel frame building that has an external steel structure and an overbuilt steel superstructure and land on the ground in tact and not on fire while the rest of the scene burns down to the sublevel?

  • The govt shouldn't be trusted to investigate crimes it has been responsible for. They'll never admit to anything as long as they're living.

  • ZotDudot7, later for the government's explanation of the physics behind 9/11, I want to hear professor imprexajay's explanation. It's totally fascinatin' and informative. I want to go back to Union County College and get my money back from those mechanical engineering courses I took.

  • Should we listen to the govt's explanation of the "physics" behind 9/11 or the scholars' and field experts'? Seriously.

  • What has not been established?? That steel molts before street tarmac? Or General Electric stopped supplying the airlines with turbofan engines????

  • You're not even American and you do not occupy the country where this happened!

    with all polite kindness from across the pond - " FUCK OFF!"

  • You don't have to be American to know the truth about 9/11

  • okay fine, so street melts slower than steel, right? I mean assuming that was the actual engine, was it a general electric?

  • imprezajay, get your head out of your ass! I'm not CHOOSING to believe 9/11 was an inside job despite facts to the contrary. It has already been established. I'm dealing with TRUTH, NOT politics. Got that? Open your eyes!!!!

  • imprezajay, so damn the facts. You are just going to believe what you want, like the Looney Tunes logic that says an alluminum airliner's engines do not melt from burning jet fuel (some steel components) but it does burn down to the ground a steel building and the same kind of airplane will strike a brick building and dissapear into a 10 foot hole without leaving wing or engine damage to the structure. You are stuck in a system of belief, not observation of facts logic or intelligent objectivity

  • imprezajay, ooooh youre right, you DON'T know. Get a degree in engineering, architecture or even liberal arts before you start critiquing evidence presented by experts.

  • A simple office fire is quite different than 800k pounds of weight sitting in the middle of 8-10 floors that are continuously on fire and spreading at a rapid rate. And your argument of terrorists not being able to get thermite and nano-thermite is pretty weak. Perhaps thermite was placed in the plane?

  • The melting point of Iron is 1535C degrees. You then stated that the fire from the fuel tank + office fires would be between 1400-1600F degrees. All that is needed for a building to collapse is the weakening of its structure, not melting. Also, thermite was used to cut the steel columns during the recovery operation, so obviously there would be pieces of it laying around. Besides, how is a skyscraper supposed to fall from a fire if there "has never been one?"

  • Comment removed

  • @imprezajay

    Been there. Done that.

    Results: negatory.

    You lose. Face the facts and get over it. Occam's razor is a buzzword that people cry out in order to "win" an argument. Study physics please.

  • Aircraft impacts cannot take down a skyscraper. Nor can raging fires. The only things that can bring down a skyscraper are controlled demolition, severe earthquakes, tornadoes/hurricanes, atomic bombs, and the Incredible Hulk. Take your pick. The Twin Towers were designed SPECIFICALLY to withstand fires and plane crashes. WTCs 1, 2, and 7 were destroyed via controlled demolition. Listen to the experts, NOT to the people who orchestrated 9/11!!!

  • "Almost every architect & engineer we show this to agrees with us that it's CD."

    Bullshit.

  • I just cant decide which of Richard Gages idiotic assertions in his "Blueprint for Truth" is the most hilarious. When he said, The policemen were obviously told [about the demolition], that was a pretty good thigh-slapper. Or when he claimed the BBC was fed information, ya gotta love it. How about when he said there was no kinetic energy during the first seconds of the towers collapses? LOLOL! But my favorite has to be his claim that after 9/11, insurance rates rose 2,000%. Hahaha.

  • it is very clear that you done no serious research into any of this subject because if you have - you would see everything he said can be backed up by multiple sources. if you want to be a media sheeple that's cool - just don't make comments when it is very clear you do not know what u are talking about!

  • Actually what's clear is that the only "research" you've done is to read Joe Blow's unaccountable kookspiracy websites and watch videos with spooky music and voice-overs telling you what to think. You can't refute the things I listed because they are true. Gage actually made those idiotic claims. He's a kook.

  • Hay dumb ass! Are you to stupid to see the fucking molten steel poring out of the fucking windows? So you think jet fuel burns hot enough to molten steel? Now who is the stupid slinky? 2 buildings get hit by planes, but 3 fall. They don't even mention building 7 in the 9/11 commission's report. You too fucking stupid for me to waste my time on you. So i guess the NYC police and fire fighters that morning, that a willing to testify bombs going off in the building prior to the impact,are crazy too

  • 911 was a public snuff film used to shock the public and enact the end of the Bill of Rights & invasion of oil bearing countries, & make money for private companies like Halliburton, (stock from 10 to 50 a share)!

    By destroying the WTC, they were able to cover up theft of gold bullion & destroy illegal financial transaction records performed just prior to the attacks

    Silverstein spends 140 million to make 7 billion almost over night; Silverstein said it was demolished by explosives, (pull it)

  • There is not dougt that building 7 was brought down by demo. And the reason why the average public will never know. So dont waste your time tryin. The WTC buildings collapsed due to aircraft impacts. Anyone can see buiding 7 falls from demo. I have never denied that. What i am trying to say and what i have always said was. The WTC buildings came down due to aircraft impacts!!. Forgot about trying to prove conspiracy. You will get nowhere. Alot goes on behind the scenes.. Turn the page.

  • The preponderance of all objective scientific analysis reported in peer-review journals open to criticism, have proved beyond any doubt that 911 was an inside job

    What is interesting is why you have been afraid to consider any of that analysis! Are you afraid your government is not your savior in life?

    Examine the online Journals, (eg History of 911 & Jor of 911 studies), written by engineers, scientists, & other professionals

    Or just msg me & I'll list 26 incontrovertible evidence

  • I'm sure that douchekike RK Owens has an explanation for all of this... unfortunately he can't hold up much longer. Thanks for the video.

  • i fuckign hate rkowens4

  • Good job Richard!

    5 STARS

  • Most of this is not new except for the uncombusted nanothermite residue but it is all smoking gun evidence pointing to SOMEONE it's not clear who all was involved but Bush and Cheney and Mossad are all very likely perps with many more of course Ollie North ass-kissing authoritarian types committing treason knowingly as well, somebody had to plant those all charges and it wasn't Karl Rove acting alone. The big question is WHATWILLOBAMADO ??? (channel by that name) because he knows the truth.

  • great stuff !

  • Busted!!!

  • 911 Commission hides that Bushs brother was head of security at WTC; unprecedented last min bldg power down entire weekend just before 911, (which meant NO SECURITY & video cams off), while men with miles of cable came in & began unknown work; security was lifted & bomb sniffing dogs removed 5 days prior to 911!

  • go for it,

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more