Added: 3 years ago
From: MalaysianConscience
Views: 5,348
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • anwar tak bersalah?? ni keputusan hakim masa 1st kes dulu>>> "Even though reading the appeal record, we find EVIDENCE TO CONFIRM that the appellants (Anwar dan Sukma) were involved in homosexual activities and we are more inclined to believe that the alleged incident at Tivoli Villa did happen sometime, this court, as a court of law, may only convict the appellants if the prosecution has successfully proved that the alleged offences as stated in the charge, beyond reasonable doubt".

    so?

  • being a lawyer myself, i wonder how CAN the court accept so many irregularities in eveidence against DSAI.One thing u should know... when the no. 1 man in your country is having so many unrestricted power, he may influence any decision by the court. If u a judge, can u simply accept more than 3 amendments to the date of incident?? When a date they proposed was found to be a date where tivoli villa had not even there?? ridiculous. Go read the fact before speaking.

  • bodoh punya farhanshahputra...u pernah tengok muka orang kena liwat kah? fuiyoohh tarak muka mau tunjuk woh..ini macam Saiful sudah kena liwat nampak macam dia sendiri liwat sama anwar..lu otak udang atau otak baja?

  • 1st

  • 1st hehehehe

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more