Changes to JavaScript, Part 1: EcmaScript 5

[bobsonenzo]

JAVASCRIPT SUCKS SO PLZZZZZ make it like Java or C# or AS3

[wakeupfist]

@bobsonenzo

That would've been great.

[Perceptes]

This was a really good, useful talk. I'm looking forward to the implementations!

[belkcarinformatica]

si no es mucho pedir el subtitulo al español o castellano si? porque asi en un solo idioma no sirve de mucho estos videos para el desarrollo de esta tec en toda el habla latinoamericana. gracias

[cesarkohl]

@belkcarinformatica uma mensagem do Brasil: LEARN ENGLISH!

[buyanaabayarja]

help me ECMAscript not working . i'm using nokia mobile browser simulator 4.0

[francoboy100]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[seandewar5]

lol all the comments r thumbs down...

[leto42]

Some words about Getters & Setters :

The getters already exists with the "valueOf" method but we didn't have setters.

I would have liked to be able to determine what is the type of the receiver of the provided value.

get : Function({type{, isInstanceOf}})

ES3 only define the "valueOf", "toString", and "toSource" methods. There is no "toInteger", "toBoolean", "toArray", or "toObject" methods. And we can't have methods for all instance names as they can be anything.

[raininginhell]

From the preview thumbnail the speaker looked like a prison inmate in an orange jumpsuit.

[HomelandTorture]

Thumbs up.

[dustindiaz]

mike! when i get an hour, i'll check this out.

[marco114]

first!