I want to see the insides , central command, torpedo room, the reactor compartments and junior eights mess rooms. I wonder if these ones still have the on board gyms and jaccuzzis. The Russians like to go to war in style!
@riverman83 BUT THE TYPHOON,DELTA 2 AND 3 R GETTING REPLACED BY THIS...SAD TYPHOON IS GETTING REPLACED....BUT WE HAVE TO KEEP PACE WITH WORLD AND TECHNOLOGY....:)
@laksh20 Typhoon and delta III is being replaced. Delta II was reitried years ago and Delta IV is being modified to rmain in active duty atleast for another decade. The Typhoon class was just to expencive to keep. They all needed new missiles.
MrRein1988 - Those Russian officials weren't bs'ing about not stopping patrols off our coasts. As for spotting them only now, no. Just trust me on that one ;-)
are you sure they are cheap to mantain? it can be read that Russia will spend huge sums of money in making them to go on patrol, and that a Typhoon- even if less quiete- is a bit less expensive
@anisocoro well, it is likely that the Typhoon will be produced along side with the Borei for Long Range attacks, kinda like the US Los Angeles class (first produced in the early 1970s) , which is still being produced along with the Ohio class even though the L.A. class is not needed..
@harris3693 What are you mumbling about? The Typhoon hasnt been produced since the late 80s and are more or less out of service today. The last LA class submarine was commissoned in 1996.
NATO navy officers are very worried about Russia's Borei class because they are both modern and powerful submarines. But Synthetic Aperture Rardars are probably able to detect them even submerged, we know that MARSIS and SHARAD radar systems are already exploring Mars soil even as deep as 1 nm under surface, The inventor of these systems are Italian, and probably gave this technology both to USA and to Russia
"Rardars" or Radars, are used for the detection of objects in the air as it is more difficult for radio waves to travel through water, than they do through air
Also, you can't passively emmit a radar wave so using radar underwater would need an EXTREMELY powerful emitter, i mean HUGE, and your position would be given up instantly, which is why SONAR is used underwater, actively it emits soundwaves to locate an object, and can passivley "listen" for sounds, while remaining undetected.
Yeah and US officials confirmed spotting a couple russian subs 200 miles from east coast of US. Russian officials said t hat they never stopped patrolling even in 90s ... and they were surprised that they spotted them only now.
USA hasstopped the military use of SOSUS ocean acosticsurveillnce system since 1992-1993, and as she had little non- acoustic dtectors, modern subs could patrol without detection. But in 2004 University"La sapienza" Italy build aradar that is able to "see deeply under soil (and water). There are twoversions: MARSIS and SHARAD, both used for Mars scientific missions. Russia has got something symilar since 1988, Ngyìuyen says
Russians always like poking their noses where they can, their old school bear bombers are always pesking around scotland and heave to be intercepted. I would'nt believe their sub story though, the Russian military is still in a terrible state.
@acorntechnique the russian militaryu constitutes as a grand museum of days gone by in the soviet era, their only sway now is their nuclear arsenal, i was shocked to see that even the UK has a larger blue water navy than Russia :o
@wingnut208 man, never underestimate your enemy, just because you got acess to a couple of secrete bases doesn't mean that they didn't make more secret bases to store their Typhoon class submarines.
@wingnut208 and you guys just love invading other countries, ain't that true chap, now don't give NATO bs saying that it is about peace because that "peace card" has been played out for too long.
Typhoon class ballistic missile subs are expensive to build and operate, this new Borei class should make ballistic missile subs in the Russian navy affordable and easy to operate.
Given the recent improvements is submerged submarine detection the value of submarines is probably lesser than 10 years ago. Of course Borei are very good sbmarines, but they too have become vulnerable. Now the "hardcore" of nuclear dterrence are Bombers. I think so because ICBMs can be intercepted, and submarines can be detected, but manned bombers with electronic countermeasures can reach their targets even against modern air defences.
@anisocoro Strategic bombers was something you could relly on in the 50s and 60s. A modern patroling Boomer (SSBN) has a much larger change to survive and attack its tagets. This is why almost no country is developing new Str bombers and all is rellying heavaly on submarines.
Two more Borei SSBN's are under construction, up to 12 boreis will be built by 2015 giving Russia a powerful punch. The BULAVA is developed by the same people who built the TOPOL M. They have no experience in making slbm's wich is why they have had many problems with this new missile.
"The BULAVA is developed by the same people who built the TOPOL M. They have no experience in making slbm's wich is why they have had many problems with this new missile. "
Bulava is well constructed.
Problem is quality control on production lines and cooperation between several factories.
best SSBM in the world! and might i add that Russia also has by far the best military on the planet today... the BMD-4 is also an extremely attractive machine!
best SSBN in world still Ohio due to their Trident-II missiles.
Borei still no have weapons cuz Bulava missiles still not entered ser vice.. and when they will enter - they still be worst than Trident and Trident II ((((
maybe Borei more advanced as pure sub than Ohio, but as complex of sub and mssile system - hes underdog comparing to Ohio.
20 missiles with 11 000km range,2000kg payload of 12MLRV's even better than 16 with 8000km range, 1150kg payload and 8 warheads.
Improved Project 955 boats might carry up to 20 ballistic missiles. Borei has about half the displacement of the Typhoon class, however will carry similar number of missiles.
Булава имеет систему преодоления противоракетной обороны: минимальное время подготовки, повышенное ускорение при старте, маневрирование на траектории, защищённую боеголовку, ложные боеголовки, активные электронные помехи.
You do not undertand the concept of Bulava. Bulava is for penetrating anti-missile system. It has !!!!flat trajectory!!!!!at the last part of distance and unexpectable behaviour of each warhead, stealth technology and so on..........Trident-2 is previous generation..
Tis a bit slimmer than a typhoon and also about 5 to 10 meters shorter than a typhoon but in tech terms far more advanced the oldest typoon is now 31 years old youngest is 20 year my stepfather was around in the soviet navy when they were still using golf hotel and november boats :D
No offense intended, my Russian friend. It is nice to see the proud Russian Navy back on her feet standing proud. This is a very impressive submarine. How does it compare in size with the Typhoon-class? Larger? Will this be Baltic based out of Murmansk or Pacific in Vladivostok?
Im agree. Though usa and russia wont go face to face in a war. Especially not a huge one where u need big daddy submarines. But its still nice to se results of science, and military fire power.
севмаш я там хуярил на это лодке г северодвинск цех 55
180587555111 5 months ago
look at the heater comments says a lot
HongKongKanto 7 months ago
I want to see the insides , central command, torpedo room, the reactor compartments and junior eights mess rooms. I wonder if these ones still have the on board gyms and jaccuzzis. The Russians like to go to war in style!
mnnh1 1 year ago
@mnnh1 doubt any jaccuzzis are installed, Only the Typhoon class was large enough for this.
riverman83 1 year ago
@riverman83 BUT THE TYPHOON,DELTA 2 AND 3 R GETTING REPLACED BY THIS...SAD TYPHOON IS GETTING REPLACED....BUT WE HAVE TO KEEP PACE WITH WORLD AND TECHNOLOGY....:)
laksh20 9 months ago
@laksh20 Typhoon and delta III is being replaced. Delta II was reitried years ago and Delta IV is being modified to rmain in active duty atleast for another decade. The Typhoon class was just to expencive to keep. They all needed new missiles.
riverman83 9 months ago
@riverman83 okayyy...thanks for advice.....but the name of biggest submarine will go....
laksh20 9 months ago
@laksh20 some would say the opposite.
MrBob2273 3 weeks ago
what is WASTE WASTE
bestamerica 2 years ago
thats one big fucking sub
chunkyskids93 2 years ago
We will miss you typhoon <; (
Tyco200 2 years ago 16
MrRein1988 - Those Russian officials weren't bs'ing about not stopping patrols off our coasts. As for spotting them only now, no. Just trust me on that one ;-)
PanamaJack313 2 years ago
all for NATO! ;)
papilen 2 years ago
are you sure they are cheap to mantain? it can be read that Russia will spend huge sums of money in making them to go on patrol, and that a Typhoon- even if less quiete- is a bit less expensive
anisocoro 2 years ago
@anisocoro well, it is likely that the Typhoon will be produced along side with the Borei for Long Range attacks, kinda like the US Los Angeles class (first produced in the early 1970s) , which is still being produced along with the Ohio class even though the L.A. class is not needed..
harris3693 5 months ago
@harris3693 What are you mumbling about? The Typhoon hasnt been produced since the late 80s and are more or less out of service today. The last LA class submarine was commissoned in 1996.
riverman83 5 months ago
Took a while but Russia finally got there putting a decent modern ssbn to sea,
TheCharlie359 2 years ago
NATO navy officers are very worried about Russia's Borei class because they are both modern and powerful submarines. But Synthetic Aperture Rardars are probably able to detect them even submerged, we know that MARSIS and SHARAD radar systems are already exploring Mars soil even as deep as 1 nm under surface, The inventor of these systems are Italian, and probably gave this technology both to USA and to Russia
anisocoro 2 years ago
"Rardars" or Radars, are used for the detection of objects in the air as it is more difficult for radio waves to travel through water, than they do through air
Also, you can't passively emmit a radar wave so using radar underwater would need an EXTREMELY powerful emitter, i mean HUGE, and your position would be given up instantly, which is why SONAR is used underwater, actively it emits soundwaves to locate an object, and can passivley "listen" for sounds, while remaining undetected.
mattmatt115 2 years ago
Yeah and US officials confirmed spotting a couple russian subs 200 miles from east coast of US. Russian officials said t hat they never stopped patrolling even in 90s ... and they were surprised that they spotted them only now.
MrRein1988 2 years ago 18
USA hasstopped the military use of SOSUS ocean acosticsurveillnce system since 1992-1993, and as she had little non- acoustic dtectors, modern subs could patrol without detection. But in 2004 University"La sapienza" Italy build aradar that is able to "see deeply under soil (and water). There are twoversions: MARSIS and SHARAD, both used for Mars scientific missions. Russia has got something symilar since 1988, Ngyìuyen says
anisocoro 2 years ago
nxt us coast 321.868 km used signal whales sonars = 20 000 khz/S
shawnee2014 2 years ago
Russians always like poking their noses where they can, their old school bear bombers are always pesking around scotland and heave to be intercepted. I would'nt believe their sub story though, the Russian military is still in a terrible state.
wingnut208 1 year ago
The Russian military is very far from being in a terrible state.
I know.
The US navy's fleet has an average age of 33 years but I would hardly call it decrepit.
I fool indeed is a man who assumes he knows whom the enemy is and an even greater one who assumes that their arsenal constitutes museum pieces.
acorntechnique 1 year ago
@acorntechnique the russian militaryu constitutes as a grand museum of days gone by in the soviet era, their only sway now is their nuclear arsenal, i was shocked to see that even the UK has a larger blue water navy than Russia :o
wingnut208 1 year ago
@wingnut208 man, never underestimate your enemy, just because you got acess to a couple of secrete bases doesn't mean that they didn't make more secret bases to store their Typhoon class submarines.
harris3693 5 months ago
@wingnut208 lol britain needs to unite to 27 other countries to play a role in the world says a lot, Russia is the last greater power in Europe
HongKongKanto 7 months ago
@wingnut208 and you guys just love invading other countries, ain't that true chap, now don't give NATO bs saying that it is about peace because that "peace card" has been played out for too long.
harris3693 5 months ago
how many is Russia making?
victorh1414 2 years ago
Typhoon class ballistic missile subs are expensive to build and operate, this new Borei class should make ballistic missile subs in the Russian navy affordable and easy to operate.
MastermindPrime 2 years ago
Given the recent improvements is submerged submarine detection the value of submarines is probably lesser than 10 years ago. Of course Borei are very good sbmarines, but they too have become vulnerable. Now the "hardcore" of nuclear dterrence are Bombers. I think so because ICBMs can be intercepted, and submarines can be detected, but manned bombers with electronic countermeasures can reach their targets even against modern air defences.
anisocoro 2 years ago
@anisocoro Strategic bombers was something you could relly on in the 50s and 60s. A modern patroling Boomer (SSBN) has a much larger change to survive and attack its tagets. This is why almost no country is developing new Str bombers and all is rellying heavaly on submarines.
riverman83 3 weeks ago
Is this supposed to be replacing the Typhoon as the flagship or flagsub? It doesn't look big enough, infact, it looks similar to the DELTA type sub..
Cyberwwwizard 2 years ago
Two more Borei SSBN's are under construction, up to 12 boreis will be built by 2015 giving Russia a powerful punch. The BULAVA is developed by the same people who built the TOPOL M. They have no experience in making slbm's wich is why they have had many problems with this new missile.
bombarderoazul 3 years ago
"The BULAVA is developed by the same people who built the TOPOL M. They have no experience in making slbm's wich is why they have had many problems with this new missile. "
Bulava is well constructed.
Problem is quality control on production lines and cooperation between several factories.
Primorsky 2 years ago
Top secret)))
drhl1 3 years ago
best SSBM in the world! and might i add that Russia also has by far the best military on the planet today... the BMD-4 is also an extremely attractive machine!
bittemeinrammstein 3 years ago
best SSBN in world still Ohio due to their Trident-II missiles.
Borei still no have weapons cuz Bulava missiles still not entered ser vice.. and when they will enter - they still be worst than Trident and Trident II ((((
maybe Borei more advanced as pure sub than Ohio, but as complex of sub and mssile system - hes underdog comparing to Ohio.
20 missiles with 11 000km range,2000kg payload of 12MLRV's even better than 16 with 8000km range, 1150kg payload and 8 warheads.
Sightless111 3 years ago
LMFAO... Bulava is better than the bullshit trident-II go fuck your ass with an iron rod faggot
Borei whips the Ohio's ass any day bitch
bittemeinrammstein 3 years ago
Improved Project 955 boats might carry up to 20 ballistic missiles. Borei has about half the displacement of the Typhoon class, however will carry similar number of missiles.
jakojako777 3 years ago
bullshit
1st unit of Borei class - Yuri Dolgoruky carry only 12 missiles. next units of 955 bis - will carry 16 missiles
Sightless111 3 years ago
up to 20 missiles
jakojako777 3 years ago
Булава имеет систему преодоления противоракетной обороны: минимальное время подготовки, повышенное ускорение при старте, маневрирование на траектории, защищённую боеголовку, ложные боеголовки, активные электронные помехи.
drhl1 3 years ago
она нихуя не имеет, потому что не летает
Sightless111 3 years ago
У тебя устаревшая информация.)))
drhl1 3 years ago
You do not undertand the concept of Bulava. Bulava is for penetrating anti-missile system. It has !!!!flat trajectory!!!!!at the last part of distance and unexpectable behaviour of each warhead, stealth technology and so on..........Trident-2 is previous generation..
kibabiba 2 years ago
A gentle piece of advice for you, that is that you don't know what you're talking about son
SouthUKGuy 2 years ago
you r an expert......sorry......next time i wont
kibabiba 2 years ago
SouthUKGuy you need professional help you stupid son of a bitch...i found dozen videos and you're saying the same thing...Stupid cocksucker
bloodz1311 2 years ago
One of the best militaries, but the best.
Rabel2136 3 years ago
i saw this new class has an escape chamber, after the tragedies before this is a good development. also that model looked like a dildo lol.
stormypetrel 3 years ago
Damn, that is very very impressive. Would assume far superior technology wise to the Typhoon.
scouserdug 3 years ago 2
RussPatriot1 3 years ago
It can't be 170 m, only Typhoons were that large..
Artas1984 3 years ago
"tis quoted from wiki, go check it out. search "borei class submarine". They are huge.
RussPatriot1 3 years ago
typhoons were 175 meters, this is 170 only 5 meter differece, oh well...Long live Russia
SillyRuskiGuitarist 3 years ago
Yeah, but a lot more upgrades.
RussPatriot1 3 years ago
it is 5 meters shorter then the typhoon
EW0Canuk 3 years ago
Tis a bit slimmer than a typhoon and also about 5 to 10 meters shorter than a typhoon but in tech terms far more advanced the oldest typoon is now 31 years old youngest is 20 year my stepfather was around in the soviet navy when they were still using golf hotel and november boats :D
VolvoFH12580 3 years ago
Looks like a fine ship. The Americans will finally have someone to play cat & mouse with!!
jkoch49 3 years ago
This is a biggest submarine, no cat&mouse fight. Can destroy ships, launch nukes, and destroy other subs.
RussPatriot1 3 years ago
No offense intended, my Russian friend. It is nice to see the proud Russian Navy back on her feet standing proud. This is a very impressive submarine. How does it compare in size with the Typhoon-class? Larger? Will this be Baltic based out of Murmansk or Pacific in Vladivostok?
jkoch49 3 years ago
Im agree. Though usa and russia wont go face to face in a war. Especially not a huge one where u need big daddy submarines. But its still nice to se results of science, and military fire power.
It will always be talk not war and I like it.
Staatssicherheit 3 years ago
never say never my friend
lexino2bezino 3 years ago