Its hard to hide your feelings when your body language is shouting loud. I haven't read Christopher's book on but i've read some shortened synopsis. Aslo I don't believe she was beyond reproach but I watched with interest how Christopher stood proud for the first 2 people he scathingly critiques Kissenger , Clinton but notice how he cringes in apparent shame on the mention of mother Teresa. Check it yourself about the 2 minute mark.
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
Chemtrails: If fogging us like roaches isn't an act of war what is? Additionally, the carpenter bee population has declined alarmingly since the advent of high-altitude aerosol fogging. Ten springs ago scores of bees plagued my outbuildings to bore nests. Now, it's rare to see one bee per day in springtime.
I saw Peter Hitchens speak at the Cambridge Union this year, in a debate he displayed lots of presence in. Still, I'd really love to hear Chris speak there.
It's a pity Peter was nervous for this one, but I think it's to his credit that he's still got a lot of praise on here despite the sophomoric hero-worship of his brother. Both are terrific writers and men of conviction, whatever you think of Christianity etc.
@mrarcher857 To be fair I think Peter's arguments of atheism can be flawed, espicially when he is talking about How atheism influenced Soviet Russia, (which it did not) but even if it did. I do not see how that would dis-credit atheismin the slightest.
@bloodmercs I agree that Peter's defense of theism is more subjective and certainly won't convince any of his brother's disciples, for example. I'm pretty sure atheism 'influenced' Soviet Russia, check out 'Religion in the Soviet Union' on Wikipedia. And he never said that atheists doing bad things discredits atheism, he only objected to his brothers' portrayal of Soviet ideology as a form of religion.
@bloodmercs Seriously this is just a massive misrepresentation of the facts. Please review Marxism Leninsim, what it has to say about religon. Then understand that this is the heart of soviet communist thinking and genesis. Then accept that it explicitly calls for the removal of religion or belief in 'God' actively and as a central requirement of the communist society. Then return and apologist for trying to absolve anti-theism of a hand in Soviet thinking and actions.
"two eminent writers" correction: One eminent writer, one washed up old moralist reactionary hack who writes for the sister newspaper of the most maligned rag in circulation.
Peter Hitchens must have been conceived with a far weaker ejaculation than Christopher, who was clearly derived from the superior sperm in his father's ball sack. I wish that pious, Daily Mail columnist twit would go and build himself a church on a lonely island somewhere and spend the rest of his days telling his imaginary friend how fucking wonderful He is.
Christopher Hitchens younger brother Peter Jonathan Hitchens (a former atheist), is a prominent Christian and believes that without faith and without strong families, the development of conscience is stunted, private life is diminished and the power of the state increased. That said, it is easy to understand the complacency and arrogance of the twisted mentality of those who refuse to acknowledge God to continue "Without Conscience" as reprobates into the underworld of perverseness/immorality.
Part 3: Please do not interpret my verbiage of Christopher Hitchens for one of hate. I have admiration for Christopher Hitchens for his intellectual witty skills and oratory. I actually agree with him about 90% of which he so strongly affirms about religion and other books he has written. I just strongly disagree with him about the existence of God.
Part 2: Unfortunately he did not heed the wisdom of the Creator of the Bible: "Drunkards shall not inherit the kingdom of God." "a LITTLE wine for the stomach" the condemnation of Gluttony and smoking cigarettes a defilement of the flesh. But, still fools look to him as their atheistic messiah.
Part 1: Christopher Hitchens brother is a Christian, Christopher Hitchens daughter is a Christian Mennonite, and his own family know the real Christopher Hitchens and are not impressed with his intellect atheism, because they have not converted. Christopher Hitchens is a egotist, in love with his own voice, alcoholic, avid smoker now dying of cancer.
It's a mystery to me where Peter hitchens gets a reputation for being intelligent. His statements are fatuous, and the thinnest kind of gruel for someone eager to witness a debate of superior class, as would anyone attracted by the name 'Hitchens' - an attraction created singlehandedly (obviously) by Christopher. It is a pity Christopher didn't wipe the floor with him.....more than likely he was restrained by a filial sense of pity. What a waste of time it is listening to Peter Hitchens!
I've seen the Brothers Hitchens together before but their Iraq views are the most striking. It's the conservative who's against the war and the leftist who supported it, the exact opposite of what you'd normally expect,
@HeyThereKahl Actually, that is EXACTLY what you would normally expect. Unfortunatelly, the current state of left liberalism and conservatism isn't normal.
@ubernaffa Well, I'm not so sure about that. It obviously depends on how do you define political left and right, but he is not longer a socialist, praises capitalism and most definitely, he is not in any sense collectivist. He is still marxist, but probably more in the philosophical, than in economical way. If anything, you could call him "centrist libertarian", if that makes any sense:)
@RUBENSolol A very fair comment, I must say. Christopher is no longer a socialist as you quite correctly say, but I believe he has said that he reasoning for his new position is that there is no longer a socialist solution to the crises of capitalism. I would take issue with your assertion that he's no longer collectivist, as I believe he is. Obviously Christopher has a great amount of respect for individual freedom and autonomy, but has always made a point of how important solidarity it to him.
9-11 happened because of the US State(which Hitchens worships) occupying the Arabian Peninsula and funding Israel. That is what Osama Bin Laden said in 2001-October, 1998, AND 1996! The attack on the African Embassy was on the ANNIVERSARY of the US State occupying the Arabian Peninsula!!!
And either way the US State has no legitimacy committing larceny to pay for any US massacre anyway.
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE TRUE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST, APOSTOLIC CHURCH PROVIDES ALL SACRAMENTS AND THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE - OF THE LIVING GOD - THE BREAD OF LIFE IN THE EUCHARIST!
WITH 2,000 YEARS OF TRADITION AND SACRIFICES OF CHRISTIANS TODAY WE KNOW WHAT THE BIBLE AND SALVATION THROUGH JESUS CHRIST IS.
MANY PROPHECIES AND VISIONARIES.
THE REAL MIRACLES, EFFECTIVE EXORCISMS, INCCORUPT BODIES OF SAINTS,
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hitchens was too stupid to realize that INHALING SMOKE INTO YOUR LUNGS ON PURPOSE WAS BAD FOR YOU. What an idiot, enjoy the esophageal cancer, it is a particularly nasty and PAINFUL one. Hopefully you will suffer as much as the thousands of Iraqi kids that got blown to bits thanks to ahole pricks like Christopher Hitchens. SUFFER!!!!
@askegg Karma is a bia*tch. HItchens mocked and laughed at Iraqi civillians dying at the USA/UK's hands. He said they were 'too wimpy' to free themselves.
What a c*cksucker. The USA put Saddam in power and then blame Iraqis for not over-throwing him. He's getting what he deserves.
@InsaneGoonRules Hitchens supported the Iraq war because he believed it would liberate the civilians, however it's a risk that some civilians will die during a war, the question is whether with Saddam in power more would have died in the long run. I actually didn't support the war personally, but from what I've seen that's his argument. His motives are good I believe.
I would think it unreasonable to say that someone deserves to die, especially when their motives were good.
@mikeyo1234 It is not only about how many people would die in the long run under Saddam regime. The real problem is, that Saddam regime would eventually fail and we would see the same sectarian violence, only there wouldn't bee any american, british, polish etc. soldiers to counter it. Also, countries like Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia (and perhaps Syria) would simoltaneously invade Iraq and made it much, much worse.
@RUBENSolol Sometimes I wonder why the people of such countries don't rise up when things get bad.
If the people are 'rescued' all the time will they ever grow their own back bone? Do all Iraqis see it as being rescued or do they see it as an occupation? Are they happier now than before?
Do you think we've made things better? Your predictions are feasible about what might have happened, but we don't know the future. It's a fair guess perhaps based on previous evidence. I am still undecided.
@mikeyo1234 Easy to say, hard to do. No-one wants to take a pounding - no-one wants to get tortured and killed. Also if you are a minority who is scapegoated (see Jews in Nazi Germany) then you can expect no solidarity from fellow citizens - indeed they may be encouraged to persecute you. Not everyone has the power of force and violence - it doesn't mean they don't deserve to live.
Not sure if the Iraqi's are better though - things seem to be getting worse before they get better...
My grandmother commented on Christopher." Atheists finally get their little church now. they even have a convention (in melbourne australia) and have sub groups and different titles, oh Gawd.....well I guess it keeps them from sitting at home downloading porn"
LOOOOL!!! XD I have never seen christopher's brother before and when they first showed him i lost it! They just look so much alike and have the same snooty, angry expression! No offence, but LOOOOL!!
@7democracY7 I say he lost. It's all in your view point is it not? If your an atheist he won, if your a creationist his brother won. I say Christopher won that religions poison everything, and I concur. His brother later in the debate conceded to Christopher in agreement that religions have considerable amount of bloodshed on their hands. But, Christopher shows his lack of humility and demonstrates conceit, arrogance and pride by not even conceding with his brother on a Russian issue.
@AtheistMovement he can't. its impossible. hes religious... you know what statistics say about the ratio between the religious mind and the atheist mind
"AntiSnoopDogma", I wouldn't loose too much sleep about it. "EmilyGreene1984", as her name suggests, was probably only born in that year, so she's just honing her newly acquired debating skills, which she has clearly barely grasped from her 3rd rate college classes. Typical right wing dogma, she just needs to get out more.
emilygreen....I've read a few of your comments and couldn't go on because my head is hurting from the face palms Im doing. I've also come to the conclusion that you're an idiot.
Several individuals on YouTube have already documented on what I've stated by putting up the original videos taken directly from their original sources
Just because a view is unpopular doesn't mean it isn't correct. Look at the popularity of Barack Obama in the United States - he may be generally approved, but if you look really closely at his views - they are those of an socialistic liberal bordering on fascism. And to prove my statement, I've noticed that any dissenting conservative or Republican views are declared as "insane" by his Adminstration. Which is ironic considering he has no problem with liberal dissenting voicing to Republicans.
Don't just say 'look closely at his views' as if it's taken for granted they'll reveal truth in your claim. List them and make a brief case-- IF you'd want to be taken seriously, which I and others would quite happily attempt for you.
Amoung the views that Obama had shown to uphold in public - 1) Position on partial birth abortion and refusing to back the Born Alive Protection Act (Basically he is for killing unborn infants based on the whims of the mother and refusing them the right to life) 2) Despite what the current media has stated about him, he has proven even by his own words that he has close connections with people who would be considered terrorists or supporting socialism such as Bill Ayers, Rhasid Khalidi, etc.
3) His hiring of individuals, who had or still uphold such ideas as putting containments in drinking water to control population levels as well as hiring individuals who have close connections with the group ACORN (with whom Obama has numerous ties to), to public positions such as the "Science Czar' or "Car czar". Amoung those he had elected to those positions, one of them proudly had admitted to being a communist.
4) Also, I find it interesting his Administration is very lenient when it comes to grassroot liberal groups protesting in favour of their ideas, but when it comes to conservatives - he asks for the public to report them to put on a "watch list" of sorts. However, none of the questions that the conservative grassroots have put to Obama have been answered with proof to back their claim.
EmilyGreene1984: Firstly, these so called "grassroot" conservatives aren't part of a grassroots movement, unless that movement centers around the hatred of people who are 'different'.
Secondly, the liberal groups aren't the ones who are claiming the right to bring semi-automatic weapons to town hall meetings.
My head also hurts from facepalms, and I too can safely say that you're an idiot.
Real social conservatives wouldn't do anything of the sort, but if you want to talk about fascism - then there is certainly enough liberal fascism going around. I dare you to prove me wrong in that regard.
["I resign my Spirit to God, my daughter to my country." --Thomas Jefferson's dying words.] -We are contradictory Beings. Nothing compares with the likes of us. At first "family-planning" is suggested, then it's codified and brutally enforced. What happens to those of the 3rd World will be visited upon us. America's landlords, the Chinese, are drowning neonates in buckets. Let's practice what we advocate for others: let's reduce the size of our families for the good of the collective.
I couldn't agree more. Its wonderful to know there are still some people left in Britain who can recognize the moral failings of their homeland and not deny it and even promote it (like his brother). I do think its sad that neither brother can agree to anything, but in a way - I can sympathize. My sister is more of a liberal, whereas I'm very socially conservative. Anyway, it gives me hope that there are people like Peter Hitchens still in Britain. :)
No, thank you. I love my sister, but I don't agree with what she believes in, If I tried to force myself to agree with what she believes, then I'm not being true to myself and I'd be a hypocrite touting what she and Christopher Hitchens are saying when in reality, I don't trust or believe it to be right.
Agreed it is childish. But Social Conservatives outside of the U.S.A. aren't seen as Conservatives at all. They're far too right-winged. It is borderlined fascist. They would turn the U.S.A. into a theocracy if they could.
GO HITCHENS!
HelFKiernan 1 month ago
Its hard to hide your feelings when your body language is shouting loud. I haven't read Christopher's book on but i've read some shortened synopsis. Aslo I don't believe she was beyond reproach but I watched with interest how Christopher stood proud for the first 2 people he scathingly critiques Kissenger , Clinton but notice how he cringes in apparent shame on the mention of mother Teresa. Check it yourself about the 2 minute mark.
thirddec 1 month ago
family dinners must be painful as hell
linkforever92 1 month ago 3
Hitchens hitchslapped Hitchens
R3APER24 1 month ago
Hitchens>hitchens
echoplex89 1 month ago
Seems to me like Hitchens used to pick on Hitchens when Hitchens was a kid. Glad to see things haven't changed for Hitchens.
R2rGangstaFC 2 months ago
@R2rGangstaFC that's absolutely true. Watching him in discussion with Laurie Taylor and he seems to think his big brother picked on him. Oops
ordoabciao 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 4 months ago
Hitchens obviously won.
MerveYoungki 4 months ago 34
@MerveYoungki lol XD!!!
Sophiethefembot 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chemtrails: If fogging us like roaches isn't an act of war what is? Additionally, the carpenter bee population has declined alarmingly since the advent of high-altitude aerosol fogging. Ten springs ago scores of bees plagued my outbuildings to bore nests. Now, it's rare to see one bee per day in springtime.
procommenter 6 months ago
wait, Peter Hitchens is a Christian?!!?!?!?!??! *head explodes*
sera7ares 6 months ago 11
@sera7ares - Yeah, he is quite an arrogant one too.
iLIKEtotallyL0VEit 1 month ago
TOO... MUCH... BRAINPOWER... ON... STAGE!...
*Universe collapses
ಠ_ಠ
TAz69x 7 months ago
I saw Peter Hitchens speak at the Cambridge Union this year, in a debate he displayed lots of presence in. Still, I'd really love to hear Chris speak there.
DissorderedArray 7 months ago
He means "English" not "Anglo-American" he is English and writes in English so he is English not Anglo-American.
mwillis1000 7 months ago
@mwillis1000 CH has American citizenship and lives in the US.
detahdomo 6 months ago
@detahdomo
Yeah, i only found that out after i wrote that comment. Oh, well he is still British by birth.
mwillis1000 6 months ago
Now that's wadda call a 'Hitch fight'.
FunkyWhitePimp 7 months ago
Hmm...I have to say this went to Hitchens.
chrisman737 7 months ago
I hate the flashplayer these days.. It randomly cuts off, and starts at the begining again.
Skoda130 7 months ago
It's a pity Peter was nervous for this one, but I think it's to his credit that he's still got a lot of praise on here despite the sophomoric hero-worship of his brother. Both are terrific writers and men of conviction, whatever you think of Christianity etc.
mrarcher857 7 months ago
@mrarcher857 To be fair I think Peter's arguments of atheism can be flawed, espicially when he is talking about How atheism influenced Soviet Russia, (which it did not) but even if it did. I do not see how that would dis-credit atheismin the slightest.
bloodmercs 7 months ago
@bloodmercs I agree that Peter's defense of theism is more subjective and certainly won't convince any of his brother's disciples, for example. I'm pretty sure atheism 'influenced' Soviet Russia, check out 'Religion in the Soviet Union' on Wikipedia. And he never said that atheists doing bad things discredits atheism, he only objected to his brothers' portrayal of Soviet ideology as a form of religion.
mrarcher857 7 months ago
@bloodmercs Seriously this is just a massive misrepresentation of the facts. Please review Marxism Leninsim, what it has to say about religon. Then understand that this is the heart of soviet communist thinking and genesis. Then accept that it explicitly calls for the removal of religion or belief in 'God' actively and as a central requirement of the communist society. Then return and apologist for trying to absolve anti-theism of a hand in Soviet thinking and actions.
MrWildbill20056 6 months ago
"two eminent writers" correction: One eminent writer, one washed up old moralist reactionary hack who writes for the sister newspaper of the most maligned rag in circulation.
angryafghan 7 months ago
Epic win for Hitchens!
gregapage 7 months ago
Wow, that was my college.
rpsmith014 7 months ago
@rpsmith014 whooo gives a hit
Deadjoe669 7 months ago
@Deadjoe669 I couldn't answer that.
rpsmith014 7 months ago
"the mail of sunday" .... I actually LOLed.
lector0003 8 months ago
I think I´ll have to side with Hitchens on this one!
FreeMason34 8 months ago
@FreeMason34
Ohohohoho! What original wit.
DUB8leA 8 months ago
Such gaping differences between these brothers. Excellent debate! Chris is great.
Jotto999 8 months ago
Wow I never knew that the brothers actually hold diametrically opposed views!
dycarbon1 8 months ago
I have the same birthday as Christopher Hitchens!
Teresa64squared 8 months ago
I like how they're both called Hitchens
thepigofhappiness 8 months ago
Peter Hitchens must have been conceived with a far weaker ejaculation than Christopher, who was clearly derived from the superior sperm in his father's ball sack. I wish that pious, Daily Mail columnist twit would go and build himself a church on a lonely island somewhere and spend the rest of his days telling his imaginary friend how fucking wonderful He is.
alexplayspiano1 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Christopher Hitchens younger brother Peter Jonathan Hitchens (a former atheist), is a prominent Christian and believes that without faith and without strong families, the development of conscience is stunted, private life is diminished and the power of the state increased. That said, it is easy to understand the complacency and arrogance of the twisted mentality of those who refuse to acknowledge God to continue "Without Conscience" as reprobates into the underworld of perverseness/immorality.
Acecool444 9 months ago
i love the laughs when they mention Christophers critique on Mother Teresa---like shes untouchable or some shit ahahaaa
TheGreatDeciever55 9 months ago
I really agree with Hitchens!
whitford6 9 months ago
Great fun
johneamer 9 months ago
I have yet to get into Chris Hitchens books and now he has a brother? That's just as well read? Damn. Too many books and not enough time!
kingofthekit 9 months ago 4
Part 3: Please do not interpret my verbiage of Christopher Hitchens for one of hate. I have admiration for Christopher Hitchens for his intellectual witty skills and oratory. I actually agree with him about 90% of which he so strongly affirms about religion and other books he has written. I just strongly disagree with him about the existence of God.
atheisthelper 10 months ago
@atheisthelper
... you can't agree with christoper hitchens 90% and diasgree on his view on the existence of god.
his views on god are too essential.
bassbasstwotwo 9 months ago
@atheisthelper
Mhm, yea, did I just hear that his cancer somehow points to God because God said that drinking and gluttony (??) is a sin??
If you call anyone an "atheistic MESSIAH", you've already lost the internet. Permanently.
twooffour 8 months ago
Part 2: Unfortunately he did not heed the wisdom of the Creator of the Bible: "Drunkards shall not inherit the kingdom of God." "a LITTLE wine for the stomach" the condemnation of Gluttony and smoking cigarettes a defilement of the flesh. But, still fools look to him as their atheistic messiah.
atheisthelper 10 months ago
Part 1: Christopher Hitchens brother is a Christian, Christopher Hitchens daughter is a Christian Mennonite, and his own family know the real Christopher Hitchens and are not impressed with his intellect atheism, because they have not converted. Christopher Hitchens is a egotist, in love with his own voice, alcoholic, avid smoker now dying of cancer.
atheisthelper 10 months ago
mirror match! FIGHT!
damres 10 months ago
It's a mystery to me where Peter hitchens gets a reputation for being intelligent. His statements are fatuous, and the thinnest kind of gruel for someone eager to witness a debate of superior class, as would anyone attracted by the name 'Hitchens' - an attraction created singlehandedly (obviously) by Christopher. It is a pity Christopher didn't wipe the floor with him.....more than likely he was restrained by a filial sense of pity. What a waste of time it is listening to Peter Hitchens!
MrLincolnj 10 months ago
@MrLincolnj Your horribly subjective, and totally atheistic.
atheisthelper 10 months ago
3 dislikes? Just whose side are you on exactly?
SmogHouseTradingCo 11 months ago
@SmogHouseTradingCo: Y'all are killing me hahaahha XD!
SoliDeoGloria2008 10 months ago
Comment removed
v01741r31 1 year ago
What is Hitchens doing up against someone like Hitchens?!
AnimalNitrates 1 year ago 4
im rooting for hitchens, hitchens is a jackass and doesnt deserve to win
DazedSpy2 1 year ago 3
skip to part 2... this is just 4 minutes of that jerkoff at hte beginning stroking himself
ibreakkidslegs 1 year ago
really ...peter WHO?
spinlessbastard1 1 year ago
Hitchens definitely won this debate! :)
cixelsyd5 1 year ago
I've seen the Brothers Hitchens together before but their Iraq views are the most striking. It's the conservative who's against the war and the leftist who supported it, the exact opposite of what you'd normally expect,
HeyThereKahl 1 year ago
@HeyThereKahl Actually, that is EXACTLY what you would normally expect. Unfortunatelly, the current state of left liberalism and conservatism isn't normal.
RUBENSolol 1 year ago
@HeyThereKahl LAso, I don't think you could consider Christopher to be a leftist anymore.
RUBENSolol 1 year ago
@RUBENSolol Well, both me and Christopher would disagree with you.
ubernaffa 1 year ago
@ubernaffa Well, I'm not so sure about that. It obviously depends on how do you define political left and right, but he is not longer a socialist, praises capitalism and most definitely, he is not in any sense collectivist. He is still marxist, but probably more in the philosophical, than in economical way. If anything, you could call him "centrist libertarian", if that makes any sense:)
RUBENSolol 1 year ago
@RUBENSolol A very fair comment, I must say. Christopher is no longer a socialist as you quite correctly say, but I believe he has said that he reasoning for his new position is that there is no longer a socialist solution to the crises of capitalism. I would take issue with your assertion that he's no longer collectivist, as I believe he is. Obviously Christopher has a great amount of respect for individual freedom and autonomy, but has always made a point of how important solidarity it to him.
ubernaffa 1 year ago
I'm sure this is the only video where we can say the frase: Hitchens got slammed.
ritoca06 1 year ago 52
Hitchens is a fool.
9-11 happened because of the US State(which Hitchens worships) occupying the Arabian Peninsula and funding Israel. That is what Osama Bin Laden said in 2001-October, 1998, AND 1996! The attack on the African Embassy was on the ANNIVERSARY of the US State occupying the Arabian Peninsula!!!
And either way the US State has no legitimacy committing larceny to pay for any US massacre anyway.
qwertypoiu4321 1 year ago
Hitchens is a fool. While he is dying he should think about the ONE MILLION Iraqi's that died because of the US massacre he supported.
qwertypoiu4321 1 year ago
@qwertypoiu4321 umm which one?
jaroncreed 1 year ago
@jaroncreed
Christopher.
qwertypoiu4321 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@qwertypoiu4321 you should think about what you say about someone. shut up
IAmTheCthulhu 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God does exist !!!
1. Living God-bread of life like Jesus promised in Bible
YOUTUBE. COM / WATCH? V = S1TCWKCUWWY
2. Manopello veil of Veronica and Jesus face exact like on shroud of Turin(no comparing to some fictional models)
3.Eucharistic Miracle Lanciano, Italy 8th Century A.D. till now alive, real blood AB!
4. Uncorrupted bodies of catholics saints
5.Calanda, Spain in 1640, a young farmer’s leg was restored to him after having been amputated two and a half years earlier
JezusSlave 1 year ago
Hitchens was clearly the winner. That argument made by the other hitchens was CLEARLY nonsense. Hitchens for the win.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE TRUE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST, APOSTOLIC CHURCH PROVIDES ALL SACRAMENTS AND THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE - OF THE LIVING GOD - THE BREAD OF LIFE IN THE EUCHARIST!
WITH 2,000 YEARS OF TRADITION AND SACRIFICES OF CHRISTIANS TODAY WE KNOW WHAT THE BIBLE AND SALVATION THROUGH JESUS CHRIST IS.
MANY PROPHECIES AND VISIONARIES.
THE REAL MIRACLES, EFFECTIVE EXORCISMS, INCCORUPT BODIES OF SAINTS,
YOUTUBE. COM / WATCH? V = S1TCWKCUWWY
JOHN 6: 32-66
JezusSlave 1 year ago
I like the part when Hitchens speaks.
Zarodako 1 year ago 30
@Zarodako lol
writersblock26 4 months ago
Yeah... Hitchens took a sorry beating in that one.
stargazer440 1 year ago 3
This clip is purely introduction. No Hitch slapping whatsoever.
adknerr 1 year ago
First comment is fucking stupid. That is all.
fr3d420 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hitchens was too stupid to realize that INHALING SMOKE INTO YOUR LUNGS ON PURPOSE WAS BAD FOR YOU. What an idiot, enjoy the esophageal cancer, it is a particularly nasty and PAINFUL one. Hopefully you will suffer as much as the thousands of Iraqi kids that got blown to bits thanks to ahole pricks like Christopher Hitchens. SUFFER!!!!
InsaneGoonRules 1 year ago
@InsaneGoonRules Yeah - because two wrongs make a right.
askegg 1 year ago
@askegg Karma is a bia*tch. HItchens mocked and laughed at Iraqi civillians dying at the USA/UK's hands. He said they were 'too wimpy' to free themselves.
What a c*cksucker. The USA put Saddam in power and then blame Iraqis for not over-throwing him. He's getting what he deserves.
InsaneGoonRules 1 year ago
@InsaneGoonRules Hitchens supported the Iraq war because he believed it would liberate the civilians, however it's a risk that some civilians will die during a war, the question is whether with Saddam in power more would have died in the long run. I actually didn't support the war personally, but from what I've seen that's his argument. His motives are good I believe.
I would think it unreasonable to say that someone deserves to die, especially when their motives were good.
mikeyo1234 1 year ago
@mikeyo1234 It is not only about how many people would die in the long run under Saddam regime. The real problem is, that Saddam regime would eventually fail and we would see the same sectarian violence, only there wouldn't bee any american, british, polish etc. soldiers to counter it. Also, countries like Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia (and perhaps Syria) would simoltaneously invade Iraq and made it much, much worse.
RUBENSolol 1 year ago
@RUBENSolol Sometimes I wonder why the people of such countries don't rise up when things get bad.
If the people are 'rescued' all the time will they ever grow their own back bone? Do all Iraqis see it as being rescued or do they see it as an occupation? Are they happier now than before?
Do you think we've made things better? Your predictions are feasible about what might have happened, but we don't know the future. It's a fair guess perhaps based on previous evidence. I am still undecided.
mikeyo1234 1 year ago
@mikeyo1234 Easy to say, hard to do. No-one wants to take a pounding - no-one wants to get tortured and killed. Also if you are a minority who is scapegoated (see Jews in Nazi Germany) then you can expect no solidarity from fellow citizens - indeed they may be encouraged to persecute you. Not everyone has the power of force and violence - it doesn't mean they don't deserve to live.
Not sure if the Iraqi's are better though - things seem to be getting worse before they get better...
mrwhippy40 1 year ago
@InsaneGoonRules
You're sick
SseBb 1 year ago
they both have a habit of putting pens/fingers in their mouths.
legodesi 1 year ago 3
My grandmother commented on Christopher." Atheists finally get their little church now. they even have a convention (in melbourne australia) and have sub groups and different titles, oh Gawd.....well I guess it keeps them from sitting at home downloading porn"
wiflk 1 year ago
@wiflk Intelligent woman. xD
Walnut1871 11 months ago
WOW Htchens is a BAD MAN!!!!
menya1978 1 year ago
is it just me or does peter seem to be a bit unhinged? i think he might be slightly on the autistic spectrum...
111steven 1 year ago
@111steven . I reckon, and christopher .looks like one of those tubby narcissistic. types you would see at your school library.
wiflk 1 year ago
@wiflk
absolutely...but it works on him... he's the sexy intellectual asshole
111steven 1 year ago
I randomly was shaking me wet hair, at the same time he was tapping on the microphrone. d(:
pervertedmind 1 year ago
Must be a bundle of laughs at the thanksgiving day, at their parents? :)
Boadeciia 1 year ago
@Boadeciia both parents are dead
MWeylandt 1 year ago
Best ass kicking ever.
pervertedmind 1 year ago
Default win for Hitchens.
lenoka 1 year ago 4
Hitchens' point was better.
bighugejake 1 year ago 3
@bighugejake lol you're a prick
LPH69 1 year ago
i believe hitchens won
lukeism2 1 year ago 5
which hitchens?
eugdog106 1 year ago
I agree with Peter's view more, but Christopher is definitely the better speaker
help4343 2 years ago 5
LOOOOL!!! XD I have never seen christopher's brother before and when they first showed him i lost it! They just look so much alike and have the same snooty, angry expression! No offence, but LOOOOL!!
HamsterFueledRocket 2 years ago
I like both of the Hitchens brothers. But I prefer the other Hitchens brother better than the other one.
yellowlucky70 2 years ago 4
@yellowlucky70
Think before you say each word.
yington 1 year ago
Hitchens needs to go home and tell his mom about the ass whooping Hitchens just gave him.
hassan09 2 years ago 2
Hitchens won by a landslide. Hitchens lost badly.
7democracY7 2 years ago 246
@7democracY7 I agree. Hitchens blew Hitchens out of the water.
DelphinusMinor 2 years ago
Which Hitchens?
michaelbme 2 years ago
The one that looks much more like the other then vice versa!
DutchLiam84 1 year ago
@7democracY7 Big Brother is always right. d(:
pervertedmind 1 year ago
@7democracY7 Funny. LOL.
Ear4Beauty 1 year ago
@7democracY7
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
l3lip 1 year ago
@7democracY7 Christopher won by a landslide, Peter lost badly. :p
lamlyn 1 year ago
@7democracY7 I say he lost. It's all in your view point is it not? If your an atheist he won, if your a creationist his brother won. I say Christopher won that religions poison everything, and I concur. His brother later in the debate conceded to Christopher in agreement that religions have considerable amount of bloodshed on their hands. But, Christopher shows his lack of humility and demonstrates conceit, arrogance and pride by not even conceding with his brother on a Russian issue.
atheisthelper 10 months ago
@7democracY7 dam...i was voting for hitchens to win but I guess Hitchens was the better man...
GREATGAIWAIN 7 months ago
Great stuff Hitchens (Christopher). Peter, not so great. Learn from your brother's beautiful brain.
AtheistMovement 2 years ago
@AtheistMovement he can't. its impossible. hes religious... you know what statistics say about the ratio between the religious mind and the atheist mind
SaintDL 2 years ago
Christopher looks comfortable in that throne-esque seat there.
Also whenever the moderate says Iraq, I always hear "A rock." This confused me at first.
mikeyman211 2 years ago
Hitchens blatently won this.
awesomewelles90 2 years ago 5
Hitchens, by definition, equals Christopher Hitchens.
lepolemicist 2 years ago
Hitchens is no match for Hitchens.
saqib09 2 years ago 75
This has been flagged as spam show
Clown prince prissy-Chrissy Hitchens
makes a good point as to why the U.S.
shouldn't naturalize British subjects.
TransUnicorn 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I rest my case.
reretacnala 2 years ago
I am incredibly excited to watch this
waldoistwisted 2 years ago 6
"AntiSnoopDogma", I wouldn't loose too much sleep about it. "EmilyGreene1984", as her name suggests, was probably only born in that year, so she's just honing her newly acquired debating skills, which she has clearly barely grasped from her 3rd rate college classes. Typical right wing dogma, she just needs to get out more.
reretacnala 2 years ago 5
As an example, here is this video from YouTube - watch?v=p-bY92mcOdk
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
emilygreen....I've read a few of your comments and couldn't go on because my head is hurting from the face palms Im doing. I've also come to the conclusion that you're an idiot.
AntiSnoopDogma 2 years ago 6
So instead of trying to prove I'm incorrect in my statements, you resort to childish name calling. That's not a sign of maturity or intelligence.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
Several individuals on YouTube have already documented on what I've stated by putting up the original videos taken directly from their original sources
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
Just because a view is unpopular doesn't mean it isn't correct. Look at the popularity of Barack Obama in the United States - he may be generally approved, but if you look really closely at his views - they are those of an socialistic liberal bordering on fascism. And to prove my statement, I've noticed that any dissenting conservative or Republican views are declared as "insane" by his Adminstration. Which is ironic considering he has no problem with liberal dissenting voicing to Republicans.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
calling obama a socialist is truely laughable
someguy2525 2 years ago
Don't just say 'look closely at his views' as if it's taken for granted they'll reveal truth in your claim. List them and make a brief case-- IF you'd want to be taken seriously, which I and others would quite happily attempt for you.
ultraviolet99 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Amoung the views that Obama had shown to uphold in public - 1) Position on partial birth abortion and refusing to back the Born Alive Protection Act (Basically he is for killing unborn infants based on the whims of the mother and refusing them the right to life) 2) Despite what the current media has stated about him, he has proven even by his own words that he has close connections with people who would be considered terrorists or supporting socialism such as Bill Ayers, Rhasid Khalidi, etc.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
3) His hiring of individuals, who had or still uphold such ideas as putting containments in drinking water to control population levels as well as hiring individuals who have close connections with the group ACORN (with whom Obama has numerous ties to), to public positions such as the "Science Czar' or "Car czar". Amoung those he had elected to those positions, one of them proudly had admitted to being a communist.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
4) Also, I find it interesting his Administration is very lenient when it comes to grassroot liberal groups protesting in favour of their ideas, but when it comes to conservatives - he asks for the public to report them to put on a "watch list" of sorts. However, none of the questions that the conservative grassroots have put to Obama have been answered with proof to back their claim.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
EmilyGreene1984: Firstly, these so called "grassroot" conservatives aren't part of a grassroots movement, unless that movement centers around the hatred of people who are 'different'.
Secondly, the liberal groups aren't the ones who are claiming the right to bring semi-automatic weapons to town hall meetings.
My head also hurts from facepalms, and I too can safely say that you're an idiot.
AsSomedayItMayHappen 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
petkragh 2 years ago
Real social conservatives wouldn't do anything of the sort, but if you want to talk about fascism - then there is certainly enough liberal fascism going around. I dare you to prove me wrong in that regard.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
Comment removed
TheAnxiousMan 2 years ago
Big brother got the best of little brother that's for sure...
Razor223311 2 years ago 5
Thanks 4 posting! By the way, does anyone know... when was this debate?
24LakerGirl 2 years ago
2008. in part 5, the moderator says "...80 years ago...in 1928"
ardrighsailor 2 years ago
I thought this was going to be a re-edit...Im kind of dissapointed
dh234 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Glad u made that point
I like Hitchens, he is a very well informed smart analyst.
But truly, he(and Sam Harris) is 1 side of the coin, the other side being Christian fundamentalists + Muslim extremists.
You take religion out of the equation, he is the same as the ones he bashes.
His book "God is not Great": awesome book.
Though if we don't get a balanced view, it is unfair.
Best thing is do is read his book, and then read "I Don't Believe In Atheists" and "American Fascists" by Chris Hedges.
MrBlondeVicVega 2 years ago
m k
zeggie02 2 years ago
Bethesda Maryland! WOOHOO!!!
kbonez2 2 years ago
I can't wait for Hitchens vs the Marvel Universe.
brokennarcissist 2 years ago 76
Perfect....
Just.....
Perfect.
FeralCr 2 years ago
@brokennarcissist Bahahaha! XD
RyouConcord 1 year ago
@brokennarcissist Hey, leave polytheism alone.
pervertedmind 1 year ago
@brokennarcissist I think this is the best comment on Youtube.
theuberwalrus 1 year ago
He has a brother?!?!?!?!!
paoloc99 2 years ago 3
You say that like he's to awesome to be related to another human, which he is.
AtheistRevolutionX 2 years ago 11
christopher is one of my idols
ProudAtheist90 3 years ago 4
Wow, I just found out he had a religous brother. What a clash, I can't believe I haven't ran into this debate alot earlier.
cupocity303 3 years ago 5
Same here. This is completely new to me.
FuzzyDuck 3 years ago 2
they have, many times
OxbowisaMstie 3 years ago
(just not at this scale, that i know of)
OxbowisaMstie 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
["I resign my Spirit to God, my daughter to my country." --Thomas Jefferson's dying words.] -We are contradictory Beings. Nothing compares with the likes of us. At first "family-planning" is suggested, then it's codified and brutally enforced. What happens to those of the 3rd World will be visited upon us. America's landlords, the Chinese, are drowning neonates in buckets. Let's practice what we advocate for others: let's reduce the size of our families for the good of the collective.
procommenter 3 years ago
watch?v=UcYv9hAkenI&feature=related
watch?v=UcYv9hAkenI&feature=related
watch?v=UcYv9hAkenI&feature=related
valerienanh 3 years ago
Yeah thanks mate! Thanks for telling me that!
;)
HitchensFavorite 3 years ago
Idiots deluxe...
procommenter 3 years ago
Peter Hitchens is the good kind of conservative
tomheppy 3 years ago 3
I couldn't agree more. Its wonderful to know there are still some people left in Britain who can recognize the moral failings of their homeland and not deny it and even promote it (like his brother). I do think its sad that neither brother can agree to anything, but in a way - I can sympathize. My sister is more of a liberal, whereas I'm very socially conservative. Anyway, it gives me hope that there are people like Peter Hitchens still in Britain. :)
EmilyGreene1984 3 years ago
Youy should try to be more like your sister.
BoOyaH1388 2 years ago
No, thank you. I love my sister, but I don't agree with what she believes in, If I tried to force myself to agree with what she believes, then I'm not being true to myself and I'd be a hypocrite touting what she and Christopher Hitchens are saying when in reality, I don't trust or believe it to be right.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why did I get voted down three times? Because I'm a social conservative? Really what a pathetic and childish way to react.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
Agreed it is childish. But Social Conservatives outside of the U.S.A. aren't seen as Conservatives at all. They're far too right-winged. It is borderlined fascist. They would turn the U.S.A. into a theocracy if they could.
BoOyaH1388 2 years ago 7
Well, being voted 8 times down clearly shows a majority of dissatisfaction on your part.
I would've done so myself, but once you've been voted down that many times, they disallow anymore of it.
TheNinjaBoy7 2 years ago
Are you American?
TheAnxiousMan 2 years ago
Haha. Superb convo there.
MaximusFood 3 years ago
Someone that is an intellect or someone that wants to reflect, do you always referr them as a nerd?
TianSan 3 years ago
I have to agree. I thought it was a fight as well. Roll with the punches, Tian, it's only text comments on YouTube, after all.
nixonfanatic 3 years ago