Is this clip from a very old video? I would say that in the 1970's or the 1980's it would be a reasonable claim that the martial aspects of taijiquan were "largely lost and incomplete" but that hardly seems to be the case today.
Is this clip from a very old video? I would say that in the 1970's or the 1980's it would be a reasonable claim that the martial aspects of taijiquan were "largely lost and incomplete" but that hardly seems to be the case today.
Is this clip from a very old video? I would say that in the 1970's or the 1980's it would be a reasonable claim that the martial aspects of taijiquan were "largely lost and incomplete" but that hardly seems to be the case today.
im a chin-na student myself. chin-na differs from shcool to school, although the basic elemnts stay the same. the chin na in this video is more passive or defensive chin na. there is another element to the art that this vid does not show which is the agressive chin na and ground techniques. a very cool video though.
I have been on the receiving end of this demonstration with Master Yang giving the instruction. He makes it look effortless, but it takes work and practice. Very painful
Again you don't know much. It is a historical fact that the 18 movements were developed from DAMu's teachings. Well I am getting mine from the guy who actually studied in China. Went to the cave spoke to the monks, came back and told me. I researched it myself and found it to be accurate. Unfortunately, I was not able to go to China for that trip. I would have loved to have gone. By the way did he tell you that many of the fighting monks were retired soldiers?
Exactly! The 18 movements were developed based off of Damo's teachings. But the fighting techniques were not Damo's at all. When people started coming into the Shaolin monastery they brought along with them the Wushu that they had learned from they're family or seifu.
Shaolin eventually became deeply envolved in learning and adopting styles of wushu, incorporating it into their system of wushu. Ex. Praying mantis, Tai Chi, Wing Chun.
Its natural for them to worship Damo as a creator. >
Again didn't we cover this. The teachings that DaMu gave were martial art techniques. They were both Chi Gong and Martial Arts. The monks used them and combined them with other techniques. Now you can split hairs if you want to but the bottom line is the founder of Shoalin Temple Wu Shu was from India.
Again Tai Chi chuan isn't a Wu Shu Shaolin system but a Wu Dang system that found it's roots into the Chen Village and later Yang Liu Bao learned it and developed the Yang system into what it is today. In order for you to understand martial arts in China, you need to know the foundations in which they occured. So please stop showing your ignorance by trying to put them all in the same catageroy. It just sounds silly.
DaMo's existence is NOT historical fact at all. In fact most think it is mrer myth. The fact that someone went to China and asked someone if it's true doesn't make it so. True scholars of chinese MA have determined most of that to be bunk. There may have been a monk from India that came to China but if he brought anything physical it was what is now termed QiGong - a modified version of Indian yoga, kundalini to be specfic. Chinese MA are regionally and family based, nto from Shaolin.
Again it's a historical fact not a myth. I wasn't talking about someone went to China and asked about it. The bottom line is that you can argue this historical origins of Damu all day long but he was the father of Shaolin Martial arts. My instructor went to the actual place where the man sat. He went to the actual cave where the man was. Have you been to China? Until you have maybe you should reframe from stating your opinion as fact.
Historical fact based upon what - the fact that a cave exists in China? Please read the true scholarship of traditional Chinese MA. Your sifu went to the place they TOLD HIM Damo sat, etc. It is part of Chinese typical history/myth that they don't care to separate. I can believe there are unicorns because I read about them in a book, doesn't make it so. I can go to Tokyo but that doesn't mean Godzilla was there too. If he DID exist, he brought kundalini yoga with him, not martial arts.
Asking a monk who was taught myth and legend as history is not the same as asking a researcher who only listens to facts and actual documents. Only an idiot will take somes word as fact just bekuz they say so. LOL Damo was real and he really sat in the cave, but NO according to the manuspcripts at shaolin they all say DAMO was not the founder of shaoin kung fu, it was just a story taught and spread as a "literary tale to add prestege to the shaolin tradation by non-monks" said by abbot Shi Yon
Ultimately i see that you have a mental complex that doesn't allow you to see where im coming from. I dont know if you where adopted or abandoned as a child (no disrespect) but you seem unable to comprehend.
Of course Tai Chi did not originate at Shaolin but monks at Shaolin are practicing Tai Chi. They have adopted it just like they have adopted many other styles of boxing. To say that Da Mo is the originator of Shaolin Wushu is to say he created Wushu in all of China and we both know untru
I see you still have that learning curb problem. I don't know whether you are just ignorant or plainly obtuse. The fact that Da Mu created what would eventually be the shaolin system doesn't negate the further development of martial arts in China. To say that it does clearly denotes a level of stupidity not seen in many lifetimes. No disrespect intended. You see I can play too. Anyway, be that as it may shaolin system of martial arts didn't adopt Tai Chi it's seperate.
The fact that Da Mo left only two books the Muscle Tendon Changing Classic & the Marrow Brain Washing Classic does not attribute him too martial arts at all. Deep breathing in standing or sitting meditation is not a martial art. It is only apart of the training of shaolin priests. I have explained to you the praciticality of things, so if it is hard to overstand then im sorry for the inconvenience. Peace
who the hell is Yang Liu Bao?...are you mean YANG LU CHAN? kuz if you are you got his name wrong lol Bodidharma aka Damo NOT "DAMU"..if your gona give a history listen at least get the names correct. And taichi has been researched, the wudang connection was incorrect and was only mentioned in a wuxia Novel(1920s) and spread by the Wu family who later re-tracted there claim,but it was already widespread. Chen clan was the actual creators based on Qigiangs 37 canons of boxing in the 1600. FACT*
Heres what it says on the encycopdia by MODERN researchers from CHINA and America**
The attribution of Shaolin's martial arts to Bodhidharma has been discounted by several 20th century martial arts historians, first by Tang Hao on the grounds that the Yì Jīn Jīng is a forgery.[12] Stele and documentary evidence shows the monks historically worshiped the Bodhisattva Vajrapani's "Kimnara King" form as the progenitor of their staff and bare hand fighting styles.[13]
Huiguang and Sengchou were involved with martial arts before they became two of the very first Shaolin monks, reported as practicing martial arts before the arrival of Bodhidharma.[14] Sengchou's skill with the tin staff is even documented in the Chinese Buddhist canon.
Records of the discovery of arms caches in the monasteries of Chang'an during government raids in AD 446 suggests that Chinese monks practiced martial arts prior to the establishment of the Shaolin Monastery in 497.
Heres a passage from the world encycopdia by researchers from shaolin temple ShiDeyang about Damo and his yiyinjing was not fact but wide spread by fiction writers= sorry ryooken
GOOGLE IT!
The oldest available copy was published in 1827 and the composition of the text itself has been dated to 1624. Even then, the association of Bodhidharma with martial arts only becomes widespread as a result of the 19041907 serialization of the novel The Travels of Lao Ts'an in Illustrated Fiction Magazine.
Your story about "you heard from someone who went to shaolin" or your instructor asked the monks........lmao BS the Monks know whats up, there the ones who WROTE the articles and books and helped in the recent research dumb ass, you look up it. ITS EVEN ON YOUTUBE! type in shaolin wushu history. YOU GOT OWNED ryuuken. go look it up and cry.
@anhkhoinguyen Well when you go to China and sit down with the monks yourself then you can say what's true and what's not. Until then I will believe the monks my instructor met. I will believe the people I met from Shaolin.
to be able to execute a lot of Chin Na locks, trips and throws, you need murderously long hours of Tai Chi to develop coordination first anyway. These throws and locks are useless unless a person is coordinated enough to use them. The only way to develop such coordination is through long hours of forms practice followed by meditation. Without coordination built up through forms, these techniques are dangerous.
I agree. Tai Chi takes many hours of hard and arduous training to make the techniques effective in all areas and situations. The video is nice for both beginners and advanced students to see the actual mechanics of the techniques, so when they practice them, the students are mindful of the objectives.
although a calm guy, I think the "most handsome monk" woul throw a fit if he saw this; Chin Na techniques are SO dangerous without the guidance of an instructor. Selling those techniques on DVD is very dangerous.
If you can show me some type of factual evidence that proves Bodhidha rma taught the Shaolin Monks any type of boxing what so ever; I WILL BELIEVE YOU.
Call the Shaolin temple of America in New York, or, if you're willing to spend the long distance minutes, call China. Or, you can just go to their site and check out the history; reliable a source as any. Plus, Bodhidharma is famous in China for having helped to spread Buddhism, he is not just famous for Kung Fu. E.g., there were untold thousands of witnesses, and imperial court documents. If you're willing to take the trip......
Hey man FUCK YOU; Bodhidharma is one of the most well-documented historical figures in Chinese history! There are tons of imperial reccords, and copies of imperial reccords that reccorded his pressence! The Chinese emperor who spoke with Bodhidharma was an ardent Buddhist; even with the seemingly disrespectful tone by which he addressed the Chinese emperor, said emperor saw to it, Damo woudl not be forgotten. Fuck you man!
Historically, DaMu taught the essences of budhist Chi Kung and the original system of Wu Shu Kung Fu. Da mu was a practitioner Yoga which at that time was one of the martial arts out of India before it degenerated into a health exercise. What is your problem and what are you looking for. The history is full of examples of martial practice. By the way I forgot something in my text below. Most martial systems only practice a small fraction of Chin'na or Dim Mak.
Noooooooooo. The only thing that Da Mo or Bodhidharma left the Shaolin monks was the Yi Jin JIng (muscle tendon changing classic) and the Xi Sui JIng (Washing Marrow/Brain Classic). There was never a document that showed him teaching the monks fighting techniques for the purpose of self-defense or attacking someone. Now prove me wrong, i brought my facts to the table now bring yours!
Uncle tom..... you probably went to college and spent all your daddies money. Dont call me no tom when you probably worship the white toilet you shit on.
I consider that money compensation for years of psychological trauma thank you very much, and it did not come from my father. And yeah that's right, I DO worship the toilet I shit on; can you imagine life without it asshole? Oh, oh, you're telling me you'd rather be shitting on pot? Or an outdoor outhouse? You probably don't even wipe if that's what you like doing you asshole!
Really post them because ALL evidence including the paintings on the walls of Shaolin and yes, I ought to know, depicted DaMu teaching the monks the Chikung and the essence of Yoga. Now post your facts and where did you get your history from?
Well then you said it yourself. Qigong is not self defense techniques. Qigong is literally energy work. Yoga is just a different form of Qigong. Their is martial qigong like the yi jin jing but it was never intended for fighting as Da Mo only wanted the monks to have a healthy body and mind. Before his arrival all the monks did was sitting meditation.
When the monks realized that the yi jin jing filled their bodies with energy, they fused it into their fist and body techniques. ex iron body
Again you are incorrect. Where do you get this nonsense from? The form that DaMu taught was indeed designed as a fighting art, it start the basic eighteen monk movement. You really need to stop talking about this. You don't know what you are talking about and it's obvious to everyone.
Come on guys, we all know Yang had like 3 main masters so of course he has combined them to make his art. But what people dont see his how he breaks this stuff down so easily for anyone to use and practice at home.
this style is so Deadly they even have a ground version this if you every encounter a brazilian jujitsu fighter very good counter this is the ancient version of Aikido IT HURTS LIKE HELL I Study this along with other striking martials arts.
Actually Chin Na or Qin Na is not a style of fighting at all but is present in all Chinese martial arts along with wrestling, hand/feet striking and some Dian Xue or Dim Mak.
Actually you are not entirely correct. Yes, other styles developed or imitated the chin'na techniques and dim mak strikes but there are systems that are totally devoted to both systems. There is actually a style that is chin'na and there is actually a style that is dim mak. I don't remember the name of the dim mak system where it is practiced but they do exist..
I deal only with facts so if you can show me this style that is devoted to Qinna and Dim Mak/Dian Xue as an art by itself, i would accept your statement. The rules to my agreement are that it must have a history, but cannot be apart of such schools like Shaolin.
Well then if you deal in facts. Let's get some facts straight. Martial arts are broken down into two things. Systems and styles. Martial systems usually follow a over all philosophy and have many styles in it. Where as a style is a specialized form of thinking that translates into a way of life. Why am I telling you this? Because you said something silly about Chin'na isn't a valid style if it's in a Shaolin system. continued
Example, Aikido is the Japanese version of the Chin'na system. Notice I didn't say style. Each style may have chin'na in them but there are very few systems that are totally devoted to either pressure point striking or joint locking. Aikido is one of them. Chin'na was a system by itself and still is. There aren't many teachers that train people outside of China this art. Both Wudang, and Shaolin have systems that focus totally on chin'na, as does Tien Sen Pai.. continued
However, the old system of Chin'na is rarely seen and I don't know anyone that teaches it in the US. The last time I asked my instructor about it. Since I have have been practicing Tai Chi Chuan for 20 years now, I wanted to see the chin'na system to see what the differences were between my system and the chin'na system. He said that I would have to go to China and study the Chin'na form. That's the last time I discussed it with him.
Cool!! I've read some of his books in 1999 and this stuff really works. I have also studied Aikido and JuJitsu, but Chin na is the building blocks of fighting in my opinion.
This stuff is so painful...I've seen so many big MMA guys brought down by Tai Chi. Theres a reason that it translates into "supreme ultimate fist". With practice you can bring almost anyone to their knees.
nah, but you can make them wish they were dead :D but the beauty is...you have the choice not to. the real key is how to get into the locks in the first place. thats the hard part
there are locks were you use the opponents arm to cut of the coradid arttery and chock him out and or kill him, this guy has a book called shaolin chin na cheak it out youl see some of the deadly chin na moves
I love this video. Beautiful Qin'na. Has anyone else ever noticed Dr. Yang has huge forearms from his training? I'd be afraid of being grappled by him...
This sounds like a Jewish type of Chinese music! ahhaha
I still like it though
jmikejapan 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Morihei Ueshiba (植芝 盛平), founder of Aikido spent much time in China to learn their Martial Arts. He used Taiji to "invent" Aikido in Japan.
47WMATAIJI 3 months ago
Comment removed
47WMATAIJI 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Is this clip from a very old video? I would say that in the 1970's or the 1980's it would be a reasonable claim that the martial aspects of taijiquan were "largely lost and incomplete" but that hardly seems to be the case today.
jhimm 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Is this clip from a very old video? I would say that in the 1970's or the 1980's it would be a reasonable claim that the martial aspects of taijiquan were "largely lost and incomplete" but that hardly seems to be the case today.
jhimm 5 months ago
Is this clip from a very old video? I would say that in the 1970's or the 1980's it would be a reasonable claim that the martial aspects of taijiquan were "largely lost and incomplete" but that hardly seems to be the case today.
jhimm 5 months ago
yeah Dr Yang he's Cool.
OCastaneda16 1 year ago
I like Dr yang...really nice guy!
QueUnlimited 1 year ago
looks like a combination from tai chi chuang and aikido :)
atotzink 1 year ago
im a chin-na student myself. chin-na differs from shcool to school, although the basic elemnts stay the same. the chin na in this video is more passive or defensive chin na. there is another element to the art that this vid does not show which is the agressive chin na and ground techniques. a very cool video though.
chraw1983 1 year ago
I have been on the receiving end of this demonstration with Master Yang giving the instruction. He makes it look effortless, but it takes work and practice. Very painful
lifelongfriendjeff 2 years ago
Where are you getting your research from? Cause im getting mine from the man whom created this video to begin with Dr. Yang Jwing Ming.
Whom is very creditable.
Kepheri 2 years ago
Again you don't know much. It is a historical fact that the 18 movements were developed from DAMu's teachings. Well I am getting mine from the guy who actually studied in China. Went to the cave spoke to the monks, came back and told me. I researched it myself and found it to be accurate. Unfortunately, I was not able to go to China for that trip. I would have loved to have gone. By the way did he tell you that many of the fighting monks were retired soldiers?
Ryooken 2 years ago
Exactly! The 18 movements were developed based off of Damo's teachings. But the fighting techniques were not Damo's at all. When people started coming into the Shaolin monastery they brought along with them the Wushu that they had learned from they're family or seifu.
Shaolin eventually became deeply envolved in learning and adopting styles of wushu, incorporating it into their system of wushu. Ex. Praying mantis, Tai Chi, Wing Chun.
Its natural for them to worship Damo as a creator. >
Kepheri 2 years ago
Again didn't we cover this. The teachings that DaMu gave were martial art techniques. They were both Chi Gong and Martial Arts. The monks used them and combined them with other techniques. Now you can split hairs if you want to but the bottom line is the founder of Shoalin Temple Wu Shu was from India.
Ryooken 2 years ago
Again Tai Chi chuan isn't a Wu Shu Shaolin system but a Wu Dang system that found it's roots into the Chen Village and later Yang Liu Bao learned it and developed the Yang system into what it is today. In order for you to understand martial arts in China, you need to know the foundations in which they occured. So please stop showing your ignorance by trying to put them all in the same catageroy. It just sounds silly.
Ryooken 2 years ago
DaMo's existence is NOT historical fact at all. In fact most think it is mrer myth. The fact that someone went to China and asked someone if it's true doesn't make it so. True scholars of chinese MA have determined most of that to be bunk. There may have been a monk from India that came to China but if he brought anything physical it was what is now termed QiGong - a modified version of Indian yoga, kundalini to be specfic. Chinese MA are regionally and family based, nto from Shaolin.
kennhiser 2 years ago
Again it's a historical fact not a myth. I wasn't talking about someone went to China and asked about it. The bottom line is that you can argue this historical origins of Damu all day long but he was the father of Shaolin Martial arts. My instructor went to the actual place where the man sat. He went to the actual cave where the man was. Have you been to China? Until you have maybe you should reframe from stating your opinion as fact.
Ryooken 2 years ago
Historical fact based upon what - the fact that a cave exists in China? Please read the true scholarship of traditional Chinese MA. Your sifu went to the place they TOLD HIM Damo sat, etc. It is part of Chinese typical history/myth that they don't care to separate. I can believe there are unicorns because I read about them in a book, doesn't make it so. I can go to Tokyo but that doesn't mean Godzilla was there too. If he DID exist, he brought kundalini yoga with him, not martial arts.
kennhiser 2 years ago
Asking a monk who was taught myth and legend as history is not the same as asking a researcher who only listens to facts and actual documents. Only an idiot will take somes word as fact just bekuz they say so. LOL Damo was real and he really sat in the cave, but NO according to the manuspcripts at shaolin they all say DAMO was not the founder of shaoin kung fu, it was just a story taught and spread as a "literary tale to add prestege to the shaolin tradation by non-monks" said by abbot Shi Yon
anhkhoinguyen 2 years ago
Ultimately i see that you have a mental complex that doesn't allow you to see where im coming from. I dont know if you where adopted or abandoned as a child (no disrespect) but you seem unable to comprehend.
Of course Tai Chi did not originate at Shaolin but monks at Shaolin are practicing Tai Chi. They have adopted it just like they have adopted many other styles of boxing. To say that Da Mo is the originator of Shaolin Wushu is to say he created Wushu in all of China and we both know untru
Kepheri 2 years ago
I see you still have that learning curb problem. I don't know whether you are just ignorant or plainly obtuse. The fact that Da Mu created what would eventually be the shaolin system doesn't negate the further development of martial arts in China. To say that it does clearly denotes a level of stupidity not seen in many lifetimes. No disrespect intended. You see I can play too. Anyway, be that as it may shaolin system of martial arts didn't adopt Tai Chi it's seperate.
Ryooken 2 years ago
The fact that Da Mo left only two books the Muscle Tendon Changing Classic & the Marrow Brain Washing Classic does not attribute him too martial arts at all. Deep breathing in standing or sitting meditation is not a martial art. It is only apart of the training of shaolin priests. I have explained to you the praciticality of things, so if it is hard to overstand then im sorry for the inconvenience. Peace
Kepheri 2 years ago
who the hell is Yang Liu Bao?...are you mean YANG LU CHAN? kuz if you are you got his name wrong lol Bodidharma aka Damo NOT "DAMU"..if your gona give a history listen at least get the names correct. And taichi has been researched, the wudang connection was incorrect and was only mentioned in a wuxia Novel(1920s) and spread by the Wu family who later re-tracted there claim,but it was already widespread. Chen clan was the actual creators based on Qigiangs 37 canons of boxing in the 1600. FACT*
anhkhoinguyen 2 years ago
Heres what it says on the encycopdia by MODERN researchers from CHINA and America**
The attribution of Shaolin's martial arts to Bodhidharma has been discounted by several 20th century martial arts historians, first by Tang Hao on the grounds that the Yì Jīn Jīng is a forgery.[12] Stele and documentary evidence shows the monks historically worshiped the Bodhisattva Vajrapani's "Kimnara King" form as the progenitor of their staff and bare hand fighting styles.[13]
anhkhoinguyen 2 years ago
Huiguang and Sengchou were involved with martial arts before they became two of the very first Shaolin monks, reported as practicing martial arts before the arrival of Bodhidharma.[14] Sengchou's skill with the tin staff is even documented in the Chinese Buddhist canon.
Records of the discovery of arms caches in the monasteries of Chang'an during government raids in AD 446 suggests that Chinese monks practiced martial arts prior to the establishment of the Shaolin Monastery in 497.
anhkhoinguyen 2 years ago
Heres a passage from the world encycopdia by researchers from shaolin temple ShiDeyang about Damo and his yiyinjing was not fact but wide spread by fiction writers= sorry ryooken
GOOGLE IT!
The oldest available copy was published in 1827 and the composition of the text itself has been dated to 1624. Even then, the association of Bodhidharma with martial arts only becomes widespread as a result of the 19041907 serialization of the novel The Travels of Lao Ts'an in Illustrated Fiction Magazine.
anhkhoinguyen 2 years ago
Your story about "you heard from someone who went to shaolin" or your instructor asked the monks........lmao BS the Monks know whats up, there the ones who WROTE the articles and books and helped in the recent research dumb ass, you look up it. ITS EVEN ON YOUTUBE! type in shaolin wushu history. YOU GOT OWNED ryuuken. go look it up and cry.
anhkhoinguyen 2 years ago
@anhkhoinguyen Well when you go to China and sit down with the monks yourself then you can say what's true and what's not. Until then I will believe the monks my instructor met. I will believe the people I met from Shaolin.
Ryooken 1 year ago
to be able to execute a lot of Chin Na locks, trips and throws, you need murderously long hours of Tai Chi to develop coordination first anyway. These throws and locks are useless unless a person is coordinated enough to use them. The only way to develop such coordination is through long hours of forms practice followed by meditation. Without coordination built up through forms, these techniques are dangerous.
stardingo747 2 years ago
I agree. Tai Chi takes many hours of hard and arduous training to make the techniques effective in all areas and situations. The video is nice for both beginners and advanced students to see the actual mechanics of the techniques, so when they practice them, the students are mindful of the objectives.
Ryooken 2 years ago
although a calm guy, I think the "most handsome monk" woul throw a fit if he saw this; Chin Na techniques are SO dangerous without the guidance of an instructor. Selling those techniques on DVD is very dangerous.
stardingo747 2 years ago
I believe Chin Na is derived from Shuia Jiao, as well as many Indian Wrestling holds that Bodhidarma taught the first martial Shaolin Monks.
stardingo747 2 years ago
If you can show me some type of factual evidence that proves Bodhidha rma taught the Shaolin Monks any type of boxing what so ever; I WILL BELIEVE YOU.
Kepheri 2 years ago
Call the Shaolin temple of America in New York, or, if you're willing to spend the long distance minutes, call China. Or, you can just go to their site and check out the history; reliable a source as any. Plus, Bodhidharma is famous in China for having helped to spread Buddhism, he is not just famous for Kung Fu. E.g., there were untold thousands of witnesses, and imperial court documents. If you're willing to take the trip......
stardingo747 2 years ago
thats not good enough. I do not think he taught any martial art, but martial arts have been attributed to him.
Kepheri 2 years ago
Not good enough?
Hey man FUCK YOU; Bodhidharma is one of the most well-documented historical figures in Chinese history! There are tons of imperial reccords, and copies of imperial reccords that reccorded his pressence! The Chinese emperor who spoke with Bodhidharma was an ardent Buddhist; even with the seemingly disrespectful tone by which he addressed the Chinese emperor, said emperor saw to it, Damo woudl not be forgotten. Fuck you man!
stardingo747 2 years ago
No FIST FUCK YOURSELF
Kepheri 2 years ago
Historically, DaMu taught the essences of budhist Chi Kung and the original system of Wu Shu Kung Fu. Da mu was a practitioner Yoga which at that time was one of the martial arts out of India before it degenerated into a health exercise. What is your problem and what are you looking for. The history is full of examples of martial practice. By the way I forgot something in my text below. Most martial systems only practice a small fraction of Chin'na or Dim Mak.
Ryooken 2 years ago
Noooooooooo. The only thing that Da Mo or Bodhidharma left the Shaolin monks was the Yi Jin JIng (muscle tendon changing classic) and the Xi Sui JIng (Washing Marrow/Brain Classic). There was never a document that showed him teaching the monks fighting techniques for the purpose of self-defense or attacking someone. Now prove me wrong, i brought my facts to the table now bring yours!
Kepheri 2 years ago
shove it up your ass.
stardingo747 2 years ago
weak comback
Kepheri 2 years ago
I don't waste valuable brain power on uncle tom retards.
stardingo747 2 years ago
Uncle tom..... you probably went to college and spent all your daddies money. Dont call me no tom when you probably worship the white toilet you shit on.
Kepheri 2 years ago
I consider that money compensation for years of psychological trauma thank you very much, and it did not come from my father. And yeah that's right, I DO worship the toilet I shit on; can you imagine life without it asshole? Oh, oh, you're telling me you'd rather be shitting on pot? Or an outdoor outhouse? You probably don't even wipe if that's what you like doing you asshole!
TOM.
stardingo747 2 years ago
homo
Kepheri 2 years ago
Tom.
stardingo747 2 years ago
Really post them because ALL evidence including the paintings on the walls of Shaolin and yes, I ought to know, depicted DaMu teaching the monks the Chikung and the essence of Yoga. Now post your facts and where did you get your history from?
Ryooken 2 years ago
Well then you said it yourself. Qigong is not self defense techniques. Qigong is literally energy work. Yoga is just a different form of Qigong. Their is martial qigong like the yi jin jing but it was never intended for fighting as Da Mo only wanted the monks to have a healthy body and mind. Before his arrival all the monks did was sitting meditation.
When the monks realized that the yi jin jing filled their bodies with energy, they fused it into their fist and body techniques. ex iron body
Kepheri 2 years ago
Again you are incorrect. Where do you get this nonsense from? The form that DaMu taught was indeed designed as a fighting art, it start the basic eighteen monk movement. You really need to stop talking about this. You don't know what you are talking about and it's obvious to everyone.
Ryooken 2 years ago
just listen to yourself........ "it start the basic eighteen movement." WTF, that was created after the fact.
Kepheri 2 years ago
Dies with a bullet in his head, anyway.
ZehFrango 3 years ago
Actually, Dr Yangs "Taiji" Chinna resembles more of White Crane. Very good though.
Dhalchini 3 years ago
Come on guys, we all know Yang had like 3 main masters so of course he has combined them to make his art. But what people dont see his how he breaks this stuff down so easily for anyone to use and practice at home.
Kepheri 2 years ago
wow, that looked painful. It made my arm hurt to watch this.
H2Zman 3 years ago
this style is so Deadly they even have a ground version this if you every encounter a brazilian jujitsu fighter very good counter this is the ancient version of Aikido IT HURTS LIKE HELL I Study this along with other striking martials arts.
romeothenegro 3 years ago 2
Actually Chin Na or Qin Na is not a style of fighting at all but is present in all Chinese martial arts along with wrestling, hand/feet striking and some Dian Xue or Dim Mak.
Kepheri 2 years ago
Actually you are not entirely correct. Yes, other styles developed or imitated the chin'na techniques and dim mak strikes but there are systems that are totally devoted to both systems. There is actually a style that is chin'na and there is actually a style that is dim mak. I don't remember the name of the dim mak system where it is practiced but they do exist..
Ryooken 2 years ago
I deal only with facts so if you can show me this style that is devoted to Qinna and Dim Mak/Dian Xue as an art by itself, i would accept your statement. The rules to my agreement are that it must have a history, but cannot be apart of such schools like Shaolin.
Kepheri 2 years ago
Well then if you deal in facts. Let's get some facts straight. Martial arts are broken down into two things. Systems and styles. Martial systems usually follow a over all philosophy and have many styles in it. Where as a style is a specialized form of thinking that translates into a way of life. Why am I telling you this? Because you said something silly about Chin'na isn't a valid style if it's in a Shaolin system. continued
Ryooken 2 years ago
Example, Aikido is the Japanese version of the Chin'na system. Notice I didn't say style. Each style may have chin'na in them but there are very few systems that are totally devoted to either pressure point striking or joint locking. Aikido is one of them. Chin'na was a system by itself and still is. There aren't many teachers that train people outside of China this art. Both Wudang, and Shaolin have systems that focus totally on chin'na, as does Tien Sen Pai.. continued
Ryooken 2 years ago
However, the old system of Chin'na is rarely seen and I don't know anyone that teaches it in the US. The last time I asked my instructor about it. Since I have have been practicing Tai Chi Chuan for 20 years now, I wanted to see the chin'na system to see what the differences were between my system and the chin'na system. He said that I would have to go to China and study the Chin'na form. That's the last time I discussed it with him.
Ryooken 2 years ago
very good
worldcka 4 years ago
very good
worldcka 4 years ago
Cool!! I've read some of his books in 1999 and this stuff really works. I have also studied Aikido and JuJitsu, but Chin na is the building blocks of fighting in my opinion.
roywilliams61 4 years ago
the master moves very naturally, continuously flowing, that' the REAL expert !
IDOTUBEIDOTUBE 4 years ago 7
中国~
wowzj 4 years ago
This stuff is so painful...I've seen so many big MMA guys brought down by Tai Chi. Theres a reason that it translates into "supreme ultimate fist". With practice you can bring almost anyone to their knees.
TerrorHubris 4 years ago
jeet kune do utilizes this techniques as well, and they are reaaaally efective. you can kill someone with this shit!
aldemar868890 4 years ago
nah, but you can make them wish they were dead :D but the beauty is...you have the choice not to. the real key is how to get into the locks in the first place. thats the hard part
kempobrad 4 years ago
chin na does have deadly locks and blows they usualy dont teach them to the public tho
daiaonu 3 years ago
save for neck cranks possibly...locks are not deadly.
kempobrad 3 years ago
there are locks were you use the opponents arm to cut of the coradid arttery and chock him out and or kill him, this guy has a book called shaolin chin na cheak it out youl see some of the deadly chin na moves
daiaonu 3 years ago
sounds more like a strangle than a lock.
kempobrad 3 years ago
define lock then
daiaonu 3 years ago
you know...a joint lock...break...dislocation...etc.
kempobrad 3 years ago
idk chin na does joint locks and stuff but they define lock as anything that gives you control over your opponents body
daiaonu 3 years ago
1.Jeet kune do is a philosophy of fighting, not a marshal art, Bruce Lee was adament about this.
2. Killing someone is relativly easy, restraining effectively is much harder.
knivesandforks 4 years ago
Yes, it hurts.
Dvivid 5 years ago
Great video! www publishing.ymaa dot com
Dvivid 5 years ago
I love this video. Beautiful Qin'na. Has anyone else ever noticed Dr. Yang has huge forearms from his training? I'd be afraid of being grappled by him...
Jucudeno 5 years ago