JohnR22926, it's not a far leap that women's Rights will be turned back 100 years when one win for women 40 years ago was/is Roe v. Wade. 100 years ago, women were able to vote. So if one Right is overturned, it's not a long stretch to be concerned about other so called victories, right to vote, etc. If Sara Plain wants to believe the Earth was created 6000 years ago, that's fine. I am not an INCUBATOR and will not be one for incest and/or vicious rape. This whole thing is sickening.
Just watch out when or if McCain ever "kicks the bucket" We will have a Pailn theocracy that will ruin this country. Get the vote out there people!!! Vote for Obama or Bob Barr.
America are assholes, they suck and they would even elect someone with a retard for a kid. Only way for you shitheads to reedem yourselfs is to vote for Obama.
the National Security Strategy of the United States, published on September 20, 2002.[15] This document is often cited as the definitive statement of the doctrine.[16][17][18] It was updated in 2006 and is stated as follows: [19]"It is an enduring American principle that this duty obligates the government to anticipate and counter threats, using all elements of national power, before the threats can do grave damage."
At least she was smart enough not to answer any questions. She kinda talked about the same subjects, but she never really gave an answer. If she had said anything concrete, she would have made even more of an ass of herself.
Huh...it's interesting that YOU KNEW what the Bush Doctrine is when even the most seasoned political scientists/pundits didn't know...including Charles Gibson. Hmmm...who's the idiot?
By the way, those who litter their sentences with cuss words are those who can't think of more creative adjectives. Maybe you should stop smoking so much pot. Think about that...
I actually did know what the Bush Doctrine was. The core of the Bush Doctrine has always been clear: it refers to Bush's policy of preemptive war. THIS TERM ISN'T EXACTLY ROCKET SCIENCE!
Palin should have known this, but she wasn't even familiar with the term at all.
People are desperately trying to spin this incredible blunder from Palin.
Ilisid, way to look up the Bush Doctrine on Wikipedia. You do know that the definition was changed in the last 48 hours, to make all you dumbasses believe that the Bush Doctrine isn't as clear cut as Gibson made it out to be. But guess what, it is that clear, and that simple. Everyone with somewhat of a grasp on foreign policy knows what the Bush Doctrine is. It just goes to show that Palin has no business in politics.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
LMAO! Are Obamacrats melting down or what?
Don't blame Americans, blame the wacko left-wing liberals who nominated the incompetent Obama as their nominee instead of Ready-On-Day-One Hillary Clinton.
You do realize that if McCain and Palin win, and spend the next four years influencing White House politics, that it will be even harder for Hillary Clinton to get elected? And those of you who peruse childish terms like "Obamacrats", and state with improper usage ("left-wing liberals"), only show us that your opinion cannot be founded on real intellect. Let alone the modern net-derived acronyms. Just type it. Laziness must be extreme when it keeps you from typing.
I'm voting against BO, but Palin really hosed up the Bush Doctrine question. Rep talking heads are trying to minimize the damage by (correctly) pointing out that the Bush Doctrine is a hodgepodge of positions that have changed over time. But...even I know the fundamental tenet of the Bush Doctrine is preemptive war. Palin should have been able to provide SOME sort of answer...but she didn't have a clue.
And BTW doofus, it's assholes like you that are pushing undecided women toward MC.
Cute John, really cute. But since you want to go ahead and go there, lets. Just exactly what plan does McCain/Palin have that will set EVERYONE in the country forward?
top: What? You made a declarative statement...that the election of MC/PA will set women back 100 years. If you don't want to explain the statement, then don't; I'll just assume the statement was hyperbole with nothing behind it.
BTW, I never claimed MC/PA will move "everyone in the country forward", so I don't see why I should have to defend the position.
There is plenty behind it. You shouldn't even have asked me that because you know what it means. And if you are a man, I suggest you ask your women friends what it means, but it should be common sense. And I know you didn't say it, but I assume you don't believe it to be true, that is why I asked you how that old hack and that moose hunter will move everyone in the country forward. That includes women BTW. If they aren't going to set us backwards, how will they move us forward?
top: A lengthy post from you and you STILL have not explained to me how the election of MC/PA "will set women back 100 years".
And no, I don't believe your statement. I think it's emotional hyperbole. But I can disagree that it "will set women back 100 years" without also believing MC/PA will "move women forward".
BTW, I'm getting pretty fed up with this Identity Politics stuff. The Left has convinced each "minority" they're victims and must vote as a bloc. America is being balkanized.
Talk about stupid and needing to get the fuck off the planet you moron. Please respond to this for your fans. What Is The Bush Doctrine? 'The Bush Doctrine' is a journalistic term used to describe some foreign policy principles of United States president George W. Bush. It is not a real thing. It is a term you dope. Now who is the idiot(s)? Looks like Charlie Gibson and all you sheep that believe anything the news tells you are. So, Whats Up With That? Now I'm going to smoke some good shit!!
The New York Times got it wrong. And Charlie Gibson got it wrong.
There is no single meaning of the Bush doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration -- and the one Charlie Gibson cited is not the one in common usage today. It is utterly different.
He asked Palin, "Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?"
She responded, quite sensibly to a question that is ambiguous, "In what respect, Charlie?"
Nice lisp. You can even speak intelligently without swearing. It was a fair question. Why wasn't Obama asked any tough questions. All his questions were 'soft-balls'. She did screw up, but she is a lot brighter than Obamarobot and you.
2008 will be known as the year the liberal movement died. What losers they are so scared of Palin they are willing to do anything to try and win. Funny how all the media is so desperate to help them win and they are still going to lose.
Dude you are 100% correct. She's just a side act to draw attention away from McCain's stupidity. Which, in any other case, would be hard, but he managed to find someone who's even more of a tard farmer than he is.
Have some respect and honor our war heros. Obama is a fake. One point, Obama makes fun of McCain because he doesn't use email (stated in one commercial) he's out of touch ... Maybe he should know something about his opponent. Because of POW injuries he can't come his hair or type on a computer among some other things. And who is Obama running against? Why is he so focused on Palin, ... I thought he was above this kind of politics. Nope, just another lie (fake).
Obama voted with veterans 80% of the time and McCain only voted with veterans 20% of the time. Your just another simple minded American who's easily brainwashed byy propaganda.
you damn well that bills often have other agendas appended to them, that's a political truth. So you need to examine it better. Instead of following main stream media and getting your statistics off of youtube.
Just look up "Vets For Obama" and Obama's focus on plans to better the post-war treatment policies for veterans. You need to stop distorting the shit put out by the media (both left and right)into fitting with your own predispositions and look up the facts on REAL ISSUES.
And you need to take a better look at the support by vets for McCain. At least McCain will not vote 'present' 200 some times. You need to smoking smoking crack.
Here is the deal. She was on the "long list" I don't think she really wanted the job. Who says "I DID NOT" She reveals that fact that she really never wanted the job. ITs not what she say's its how she says it that is eye opening.
I think you're blowing her comments from the video way out of proportion because I agree with her and I'm one of the most rational, sane people you'll ever meet.
she didn't answer any of his questions! how good of a leader could she possibly be if all she can do is spew nonsense and *beat around the bush* doctrine?
seriously, as an outsider from across the pond, i'm very worried about the U.S.A's ability to elect a competent leader. bring back back Bill, at least he made us laugh.
Sure she did. She answered them just as EVERY politician out there does, vague and without a YES or NO. Big fucking deal, stop making it more than it is.
Not any more so than any other politician. People are just looking for excuses to bash her and the bias is showing right through. It's pretty easy to see as an independent when someone's letting their democratic bias get in the way of their actual thinking process. Her answers were fine... her religious ideology however is fucked way the hell up. I'm willing to put up with that tidbit while keeping the big picture in mind.
All the Americans who are competent have just given up I feel. We are the minority now. It's hard to convince idiots that they're making a stupid decision. Especially when there is more of them, and they feel the louder they talk over you, the more water their arguments hold. Plus when it comes to trying to discredit somebody by saying all they are is a community leader (talking about the attacks on obama) there is really nothing you can do with that kind of ignorance.
Then you'd better reassess your priorities. The women likes to kill animals from a plane. Has nothing to do with her campaign, but really lets you know what kind of person she is. Plus, she is a complete idiot, who is even more inexperienced than Obama. I really don't know what brought you to her side, but I'm guessing you just haven't done enough research on her.
No doubt. Sums it up. Waste of skin, i'd rather get gang raped and murdered by 27 filipino trannies than have her any closer to the presidency of the world's only superpower.
It'll be interesting to see her debate Joe Biden. I have a feeling she's going to be pulling a lot of the 'victimized woman who is being beat up by the big bad old man' and 'you hate me because I'm beautiful', because she really won't be able to debate. The whole thing is a bad joke.
Talking about taking the words out of my mouth. If the Reps win with this ticket I'm emigrating off-world (or at least giving up completely and becoming a hermit).
could you get me a ticket? i don't live in the states, but i'm still worried about this woman controlling the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons in the world :S
actually, could i bring my dog too? she doesn't like idiots either :P
Did you see the video of Mat Damon ripping on Palin. I love the part when he says, "I need to know whether she thinks dinosaurs were around 4000 years ago, because she's going to have the nuclear codes." Fucking hilarious... Good videos Pot Head Pundit. One of these days, I'm going to work up to a video response. From Ryan in Japan.
This has been flagged as spam show
E uhh wow this video has 2 be one of the Silliest and sexiest vids online. just like me! l
elizabeth7800 3 years ago
i love this video.i lough so hard i almost let it.
wagnew 3 years ago
Excellent. It's abrilliant and accurate analogy.
jabberwock01 3 years ago 2
Thank you
Ic37r011 3 years ago
Couldn't have said it better.
UlfAslak 3 years ago 7
excellent point dude
homelessjoe 3 years ago 5
JohnR22926, it's not a far leap that women's Rights will be turned back 100 years when one win for women 40 years ago was/is Roe v. Wade. 100 years ago, women were able to vote. So if one Right is overturned, it's not a long stretch to be concerned about other so called victories, right to vote, etc. If Sara Plain wants to believe the Earth was created 6000 years ago, that's fine. I am not an INCUBATOR and will not be one for incest and/or vicious rape. This whole thing is sickening.
05Corvette05 3 years ago
Just watch out when or if McCain ever "kicks the bucket" We will have a Pailn theocracy that will ruin this country. Get the vote out there people!!! Vote for Obama or Bob Barr.
chumppa 3 years ago 3
That dog is smarter than Palin.
whiteguysamurai 3 years ago 4
Nice barking :-)
pmfcal 3 years ago
we're all gonna die
foxVSbunny 3 years ago
America are assholes, they suck and they would even elect someone with a retard for a kid. Only way for you shitheads to reedem yourselfs is to vote for Obama.
skettle2000 3 years ago 2
if you enjoy living in commnist russia then ya ok im sure you'd like us to vote obama
daveman393 3 years ago
She needs to leave this planet for the good of all
She is a backyard Taliban
CoPiloT21 3 years ago 3
the National Security Strategy of the United States, published on September 20, 2002.[15] This document is often cited as the definitive statement of the doctrine.[16][17][18] It was updated in 2006 and is stated as follows: [19]"It is an enduring American principle that this duty obligates the government to anticipate and counter threats, using all elements of national power, before the threats can do grave damage."
Pekabooicu 3 years ago
more people died in Irak (americans included) than in the two towers. seriously, make a war from 2 buildings?
Discipol 3 years ago
well said
Leoquarius1289 3 years ago
awesome.
justin2535 3 years ago
At least she was smart enough not to answer any questions. She kinda talked about the same subjects, but she never really gave an answer. If she had said anything concrete, she would have made even more of an ass of herself.
uberjim83 3 years ago
If this was a job interivew she wouln't be asked back for a second.
forty8r 3 years ago
great video.
intarwebzz 3 years ago 3
excellent points. Palin truly is the GOPs distracting "jump the shark".
shnazzyone 3 years ago 2
agree with you dude.
louis4louis 3 years ago 4
Ahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaa
urchinau 3 years ago
Huh...it's interesting that YOU KNEW what the Bush Doctrine is when even the most seasoned political scientists/pundits didn't know...including Charles Gibson. Hmmm...who's the idiot?
By the way, those who litter their sentences with cuss words are those who can't think of more creative adjectives. Maybe you should stop smoking so much pot. Think about that...
jbuman22 3 years ago
He looks at wikipedia and pretends he knows what he talking abt
jlarpi 3 years ago
Your the idiot.... Think about THAT :)
MastaChief10 3 years ago
Wow! A dagger with a smile... :o) By the way, it should be "YOU'RE an idiot" not "your..."
jbuman22 3 years ago
I knew what it was becauss issues matter to me.
shnazzyone 3 years ago
I actually did know what the Bush Doctrine was. The core of the Bush Doctrine has always been clear: it refers to Bush's policy of preemptive war. THIS TERM ISN'T EXACTLY ROCKET SCIENCE!
Palin should have known this, but she wasn't even familiar with the term at all.
People are desperately trying to spin this incredible blunder from Palin.
hillerm 3 years ago 2
Ilisid, way to look up the Bush Doctrine on Wikipedia. You do know that the definition was changed in the last 48 hours, to make all you dumbasses believe that the Bush Doctrine isn't as clear cut as Gibson made it out to be. But guess what, it is that clear, and that simple. Everyone with somewhat of a grasp on foreign policy knows what the Bush Doctrine is. It just goes to show that Palin has no business in politics.
desilong 3 years ago 3
I am all with you Mr! Nice video...I dearly love you...America has hope b/c of young people like you..Thank you for posting the video
airforcelife 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LMAO! Are Obamacrats melting down or what?
Don't blame Americans, blame the wacko left-wing liberals who nominated the incompetent Obama as their nominee instead of Ready-On-Day-One Hillary Clinton.
Hillary is laughing all the way to 2012.
Obama Fans, you've got a problem...
McCain/Palin 2008!
happyhappyjoyjoy2008 3 years ago
You do realize that if McCain and Palin win, and spend the next four years influencing White House politics, that it will be even harder for Hillary Clinton to get elected? And those of you who peruse childish terms like "Obamacrats", and state with improper usage ("left-wing liberals"), only show us that your opinion cannot be founded on real intellect. Let alone the modern net-derived acronyms. Just type it. Laziness must be extreme when it keeps you from typing.
Moretrutherthan 3 years ago
I don't understand your good mood or enthusiasm. You don't seem to be too bright, frankly.
unamendable 3 years ago
your anti-intellectualism is showing very well in this post. keep up the good work!
brfts2001 3 years ago
Believe me if they get in the white house, there will be no Hillary 2012.
topguns01204 3 years ago
I'm voting against BO, but Palin really hosed up the Bush Doctrine question. Rep talking heads are trying to minimize the damage by (correctly) pointing out that the Bush Doctrine is a hodgepodge of positions that have changed over time. But...even I know the fundamental tenet of the Bush Doctrine is preemptive war. Palin should have been able to provide SOME sort of answer...but she didn't have a clue.
And BTW doofus, it's assholes like you that are pushing undecided women toward MC.
JohnR22926 3 years ago
Yeah and those women are only setting themselves back 100 years by electing that Christian extremist in office.
topguns01204 3 years ago
top: Just exactly how would the election of McCain/Palin "set women back 100 years"?
I can anticipate your answer, but I don't want to put words in your mouth.
JohnR22926 3 years ago
Cute John, really cute. But since you want to go ahead and go there, lets. Just exactly what plan does McCain/Palin have that will set EVERYONE in the country forward?
topguns01204 3 years ago
top: What? You made a declarative statement...that the election of MC/PA will set women back 100 years. If you don't want to explain the statement, then don't; I'll just assume the statement was hyperbole with nothing behind it.
BTW, I never claimed MC/PA will move "everyone in the country forward", so I don't see why I should have to defend the position.
JohnR22926 3 years ago 2
There is plenty behind it. You shouldn't even have asked me that because you know what it means. And if you are a man, I suggest you ask your women friends what it means, but it should be common sense. And I know you didn't say it, but I assume you don't believe it to be true, that is why I asked you how that old hack and that moose hunter will move everyone in the country forward. That includes women BTW. If they aren't going to set us backwards, how will they move us forward?
topguns01204 3 years ago 2
top: A lengthy post from you and you STILL have not explained to me how the election of MC/PA "will set women back 100 years".
And no, I don't believe your statement. I think it's emotional hyperbole. But I can disagree that it "will set women back 100 years" without also believing MC/PA will "move women forward".
BTW, I'm getting pretty fed up with this Identity Politics stuff. The Left has convinced each "minority" they're victims and must vote as a bloc. America is being balkanized.
JohnR22926 3 years ago
If you say so.
topguns01204 3 years ago
Oh, and please, I much rather hear from you and not their website.
topguns01204 3 years ago
Talk about stupid and needing to get the fuck off the planet you moron. Please respond to this for your fans. What Is The Bush Doctrine? 'The Bush Doctrine' is a journalistic term used to describe some foreign policy principles of United States president George W. Bush. It is not a real thing. It is a term you dope. Now who is the idiot(s)? Looks like Charlie Gibson and all you sheep that believe anything the news tells you are. So, Whats Up With That? Now I'm going to smoke some good shit!!
ilisid 3 years ago
The New York Times got it wrong. And Charlie Gibson got it wrong.
There is no single meaning of the Bush doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration -- and the one Charlie Gibson cited is not the one in common usage today. It is utterly different.
He asked Palin, "Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?"
She responded, quite sensibly to a question that is ambiguous, "In what respect, Charlie?"
LizzyxDarcy 3 years ago
Nice one.
PrinzipHoffnung 3 years ago
LOl! Great video, 5 stars!
Kevoproductionstv 3 years ago 2
Nice lisp. You can even speak intelligently without swearing. It was a fair question. Why wasn't Obama asked any tough questions. All his questions were 'soft-balls'. She did screw up, but she is a lot brighter than Obamarobot and you.
jptietz 3 years ago
2008 will be known as the year the liberal movement died. What losers they are so scared of Palin they are willing to do anything to try and win. Funny how all the media is so desperate to help them win and they are still going to lose.
McCain Palin 08'
CesareConqueror 3 years ago
Dude you are 100% correct. She's just a side act to draw attention away from McCain's stupidity. Which, in any other case, would be hard, but he managed to find someone who's even more of a tard farmer than he is.
zbambam5 3 years ago 4
Have some respect and honor our war heros. Obama is a fake. One point, Obama makes fun of McCain because he doesn't use email (stated in one commercial) he's out of touch ... Maybe he should know something about his opponent. Because of POW injuries he can't come his hair or type on a computer among some other things. And who is Obama running against? Why is he so focused on Palin, ... I thought he was above this kind of politics. Nope, just another lie (fake).
jptietz 3 years ago
Obama voted with veterans 80% of the time and McCain only voted with veterans 20% of the time. Your just another simple minded American who's easily brainwashed byy propaganda.
efeez1986 3 years ago
you damn well that bills often have other agendas appended to them, that's a political truth. So you need to examine it better. Instead of following main stream media and getting your statistics off of youtube.
jptietz 3 years ago
Just look up "Vets For Obama" and Obama's focus on plans to better the post-war treatment policies for veterans. You need to stop distorting the shit put out by the media (both left and right)into fitting with your own predispositions and look up the facts on REAL ISSUES.
sumbaudy 3 years ago
And you need to take a better look at the support by vets for McCain. At least McCain will not vote 'present' 200 some times. You need to smoking smoking crack.
jptietz 3 years ago
Pothead, your trash mouth and lack of tact is why your party is behind in the polls.
skydogz1 3 years ago
my party. LOL
PotheadPundit 3 years ago
Here is the deal. She was on the "long list" I don't think she really wanted the job. Who says "I DID NOT" She reveals that fact that she really never wanted the job. ITs not what she say's its how she says it that is eye opening.
nmbypmby34 3 years ago
I think you're blowing her comments from the video way out of proportion because I agree with her and I'm one of the most rational, sane people you'll ever meet.
Aedak33 3 years ago
she didn't answer any of his questions! how good of a leader could she possibly be if all she can do is spew nonsense and *beat around the bush* doctrine?
seriously, as an outsider from across the pond, i'm very worried about the U.S.A's ability to elect a competent leader. bring back back Bill, at least he made us laugh.
FA113 3 years ago
Sure she did. She answered them just as EVERY politician out there does, vague and without a YES or NO. Big fucking deal, stop making it more than it is.
Aedak33 3 years ago
i'm not, it's true that every politician does tends to avoid direct questions, but her answers were horribly forced and diverting...
FA113 3 years ago
Not any more so than any other politician. People are just looking for excuses to bash her and the bias is showing right through. It's pretty easy to see as an independent when someone's letting their democratic bias get in the way of their actual thinking process. Her answers were fine... her religious ideology however is fucked way the hell up. I'm willing to put up with that tidbit while keeping the big picture in mind.
Aedak33 3 years ago
All the Americans who are competent have just given up I feel. We are the minority now. It's hard to convince idiots that they're making a stupid decision. Especially when there is more of them, and they feel the louder they talk over you, the more water their arguments hold. Plus when it comes to trying to discredit somebody by saying all they are is a community leader (talking about the attacks on obama) there is really nothing you can do with that kind of ignorance.
zbambam5 3 years ago 2
Then you'd better reassess your priorities. The women likes to kill animals from a plane. Has nothing to do with her campaign, but really lets you know what kind of person she is. Plus, she is a complete idiot, who is even more inexperienced than Obama. I really don't know what brought you to her side, but I'm guessing you just haven't done enough research on her.
zbambam5 3 years ago 2
you rock jedi rules , palin IS A NAZI and a CHRISTIAN EXTREMIST TERRORIST WANABE
TraptinurMinds 3 years ago
her demeanor and tone is more like my fargin bus driver when i was in 8th grade....
fur godz sakes...who the fuk is this bitch!?
flybyya87 3 years ago
I think you rock!
Fuck Sarah Palin!
Someguywithacomputer 3 years ago 3
Well, anyone who begins a video response on a political issue by referring to a candidate as a 'F#@cking idiot' reveals their own ignorance.
Very classy, very eloquent.(Sarcasm, of course)
I am not even sure why I condescended to reply to this!
xoxoxoxooxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxooxoxoxoxoxox
Snowhitevil 3 years ago
fuckdick has a whoremonger? arf arf
PotheadPundit 3 years ago
you told your dog to be quiet, right? i understood that
LedusZeppelinus 3 years ago 2
yeah. I said. Ticho Bud . Which means "Be Quiet" :) Jedi doesn't speak english. But we're working on it.
PotheadPundit 3 years ago
anther great vid
BrianJunglist 3 years ago
yeah I know the barking dog I have used it before quite effective
Redfox161616 3 years ago
Word.
mconn2112 3 years ago
we want more! we want more vdo from you....thatz a cool metaphor u used...
baalram 3 years ago
I couldn't agree more.
riversonthemoon 3 years ago
"jedi`s bringing some shit..."
haha hey! a barking dog! heheh...but yeah i totally agree
WeskJago 3 years ago
i would like to say to palin what capnoawesome has before all his videos
you suck your religion sucks stop breathing my air
nailo1 3 years ago 2
preach it, brother!! :P
FA113 3 years ago
No doubt. Sums it up. Waste of skin, i'd rather get gang raped and murdered by 27 filipino trannies than have her any closer to the presidency of the world's only superpower.
Neeboopsh 3 years ago
It'll be interesting to see her debate Joe Biden. I have a feeling she's going to be pulling a lot of the 'victimized woman who is being beat up by the big bad old man' and 'you hate me because I'm beautiful', because she really won't be able to debate. The whole thing is a bad joke.
jellygraph 3 years ago
"gtfo my planet"
that was my comment xD
FA113 3 years ago 3
haha. cheers. i couldn't agree more!
PotheadPundit 3 years ago
Talking about taking the words out of my mouth. If the Reps win with this ticket I'm emigrating off-world (or at least giving up completely and becoming a hermit).
stevebritgimp 3 years ago
could you get me a ticket? i don't live in the states, but i'm still worried about this woman controlling the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons in the world :S
actually, could i bring my dog too? she doesn't like idiots either :P
FA113 3 years ago
Barking dog? I've never heard of that play and I've 4 years varsity... but, I get your point.
osiris33 3 years ago
Blast the bitch into outerspace!
Philosophobia 3 years ago 4
I think there should be a campaign to blast her into outer space. She would be a good test subject to test the strength of gravity in black holes. :)
PotheadPundit 3 years ago
I'd like to give Sarah Palin a nice, swift kick in her nuts.
Philosophobia 3 years ago
Palin is Bush in a skirt.
-----
She looked just like Miss South Carolina with the answer to the Bush Doctrine question, and it was wonderful, in a sick way.
I literally LMAO. ...This neophyte, idiot is what McSame gives to America!? And his supporters call him a patriot?
I cannot tell if I am nore stunned or outraged by McSame's contempt for our nation. He thinks Palin is the best we deserve?
What a bastard!
dfarmer1584 3 years ago 3
Did you see the video of Mat Damon ripping on Palin. I love the part when he says, "I need to know whether she thinks dinosaurs were around 4000 years ago, because she's going to have the nuclear codes." Fucking hilarious... Good videos Pot Head Pundit. One of these days, I'm going to work up to a video response. From Ryan in Japan.
RyRyVids 3 years ago 3
So true. So true.
Quacker1 3 years ago 3