I don't know about you guys, but that last bit from where the F-15 takes the missile hit to missile impact gives me chills. Knowing what it takes to assure the success of the mission, then the last moment is chilling. The Tu-160 is flying low, wings sweeping like a diving bird as its launch point comes up, coming out of the rising sun on the horizon, then the pitchup and bank to get away... then KABOOM!!! Just think how capable our worlds' militaries have become... come to this.
@Kamu0001 nice vid bro, but how do you switch the natural view in 3d persin? i mean i press f2, but at 2:53 camera is moving arouna a bit. could you teach me what to press :)) thx
MiG-29 isn't outdated, RU missiles were always better than NATO standard. (check technical data), MiG29 is able to acquire radar lock of F16 far more earlier than F-16 on MiG29. Compare sizes of these airplanes, which is bigger and easier to lock? On paper looks F-16 radar better, newer technology, but reality is different. Did you know that F-16 concept is from 1967?
First off, in the end of the video it says right there who the video was made by, secondly I agree with you Nazorgator that explosion gave me chills all over the places and then some, Can you imagion if a scenario like that really happened? ANd was announced to the world?
I'm all about western air power but I git to admit , The TU-160 has got to be the prettiest angel of death the world has ever see'n !!! The thing in bigger than a b-52 and it's super sonic that's just fuck'n sexy !
The tu-160 isn't bigger than a b-52, just thought you should know. It is much more maneuverable, only problem is that it lights up a radar like fireworks.
I will agree with you completely, trust me. The Soviets and Russians have kick ass technology. Its funny sometime how people think western aircraft are better. There are so many aircraft in the Russian air force that make some of our planes look like flying piles of shit. For example the SU-22, Mikoyan 29 (Mig 29), but then again, each aircraft has one weak point which another turns into a strength.
Yeah, its funny how some people believe in Russian technology despite real war experience (Bekaa Valley, Desert Storm, Balkans). Su-22? Doesn't have the radar at all. MiG-29? Ask pilot how long it could remain in dogfight! The lack of fuel would enforce you to leave the fight - and then you get your ass kicked with missile!
I don't know about Bekaa Valley, but if you talked about the Desert Storm where 200 Western aircraft most of which were upgraded to the most advance avionic system and were covered by EWACS, and ECM. While Russian technology you mentioned was what? 40 out of dated Mig-29 most of them didn't even take off the ground? No radar guiding, no ECM supported. So, before you state your view, you should get some facts support, ok?
Gforce: what your point is? Are soviet airctaft better or worse than western?
The 1991 MiG's-29 we're not outdated (used
in Iraq since 1989, in USSR since 1985 in first line). They were not able to shoot down even single western aircraft, while having worse radar, worse missiles and lack of flexible command and control system. These are the facts. This is "superior" Russian technology.
I have some corrections to make on your comments my friend. First of all, how in the fuck is the su-22 going to lock onto a target without a radar and infra red friend or foe indicator? same goes for the mig 29. They both have radar that are just as effective as western radar technologies. Their medium range and bvr missiles match western capabilities. Oh and also a point, in the wars you mentioned earlier, the f-15 pilots happened to be flying against the mig 21,
@AK04Tiger WTF? Since when Su-22 have an radar? Maybe im uninformed or something but the only plane of Fitter's family which carried a radar equipement was Su-17 with Kvant-1 ranging radar i think.
so if you ask me, its lie putting a tiger and a house cat in a fight, then when the tiger wins, you assume that a tiger will also easily defeat a lion. so ill tell you what. when you realize that russion air force capabilites and western air force capabilities are in a stalemate, for the reason that where the west has weaknesses, the russions have strengths and vice versa. so there is a 50-50 chance that a f-15 would win a dogfight with a su-22.
@AK04Tiger the Su-22 is an attack bomber, thats like saying an F-15 has a 50-50 chance in taking an F-111. it would 50-50 if it was an F-15 and an Su-27 maybe.
I will now correct my spelling of russian, by indicating that i have a new keyboard. i hate ergonomic keyboards, and ill change by the next time i comment i should think. shove my previous comments on a plate and eat it.
mind you, that those planes are the highest flying planes on earth, the go just a 100 km/h slower than the blackbird, And the blackbird is a spyplane, no external weapons, the migs did had external weapons. sow don't beat the 25 and 31 down, remember the F15 was build on the same plans ast the 31. and it still aint as fast
@Planetrix15 i cant believe im getting into this arguement but o well. the f 15 is good, but the su-27 would would make the f 15 its bitch. now, pit the f22 against ANY aircraft in the world, and well.... it wins, because you can't shoot something you can't see. but really russia and america are pretty much neck & neck with ANYTHING military ( except special forces because navy SEALs pwn anything) because we were so competitive. but now we're allies so who cares
@yawnyman im not going to argue because i know that no matter what you say it wont change my mind, and the goes for you. when someone picks out a favorite plane no one will chnage their mind so i respect your choice but i will stick with my choice. but your are right f-22 would just mess up anything in its way! :)
Perso ALLEZ L'ARMEE DE L'AIR Vive les pilotes francais et tout le bordel et Vive les mirage 2000 MADE IN FRANCE BY DASSAULT AVIATION et vive la france voila
Alors toi, je suis fier de Dassault, ils ont fait des avions qui sont fort et vite. La France a un force militaire qui est tres eficace. Plus les soldats francais sont des meilleurs au monde.
These bombers are designed to survive flashes of nuclear explosions. We all still remember that Tu 22 survived during test of 50 MT thermonuclear bomb. Here we can see just a small cruise missile - much less than 1 MT, and such missile, unlike any bomb able to hit target very far from the point of launch. So there is no chance for Tu160 to be injured by explosion.
lol im suprised u asked that question. A nuke is more than a weapon, its a deterrent. If two sides have nukes and use them, then both sides will lose. Nukes are used to avoid wars, and very rarely, end them. If we used a nuke on iraq, u'd be killing more than the enemy. You cant chose who u kill with a nuke, so it will kill innocent lives. If war was that easy, this wouldnt be a problem. Great video btw!!!
Im gonna go ahead and stop this here before you reply to me and this ends up a argument on this guy's video.
And your just putting words into my mouth now,When was a "referring" to being smarter then you. I said I "Might for all you know" But I guess I maybe am since you cant understand that. And there is nothing wrong with my last comment in grammar, did I forget a comma?
dramatic nuke ending, i love it
scrumhalf621 2 months ago
скажите пожайлуста как называется вторая песня????
wildwind67 5 months ago
2:21 how do you switch this view? what do you press? (when camera is shaking a bit and gives more natural feeling of flight)
GEORGIANMANDAVID 6 months ago
Great Atmosphera !!! NICe Video ...
one person pressed the wrong thumbs button :)
gigliom 6 months ago
I don't know about you guys, but that last bit from where the F-15 takes the missile hit to missile impact gives me chills. Knowing what it takes to assure the success of the mission, then the last moment is chilling. The Tu-160 is flying low, wings sweeping like a diving bird as its launch point comes up, coming out of the rising sun on the horizon, then the pitchup and bank to get away... then KABOOM!!! Just think how capable our worlds' militaries have become... come to this.
XF540 6 months ago
Great game. This video made me sad though :(
TEHGROUND 11 months ago
iv never herd of lock on.....what is it and were can I get it?
emerychandler 1 year ago
the best video of lock-on for sure!!!!!
RCthings1 1 year ago
Question: Can you really fly in the middle of a missile's path so that it'll lock onto you and not the aircraft it originally targeted ?
kertaspaper94 1 year ago
@kertaspaper94 i think so... thats how flares and chaff works
mervynsjy 10 months ago
It's Lock On
Kamu0001 1 year ago
@Kamu0001 nice vid bro, but how do you switch the natural view in 3d persin? i mean i press f2, but at 2:53 camera is moving arouna a bit. could you teach me what to press :)) thx
GEORGIANMANDAVID 2 months ago
what game is this ???
crazytubex 1 year ago
Wow.
ThaFunkster100 1 year ago
Absolutely Beautiful!
I take my hat off to you!
ArRo67 1 year ago 2
I love it!
jagtgeschwader24 1 year ago
what's the song's name
eb1101 1 year ago
@eb1101 My Immortal
bassplaya1549 1 year ago
beautiful
eb1101 1 year ago
loved epic battle ;)
factorxitox 1 year ago
mig 29s rulez in lock on not only its light and fast but its really easy to shoot some bullets with this one
mjufpn 1 year ago
Omg Some of u is Stupid to Listen On
EWACS? Its AWACS.
F-16 Ehe... Its a Ligth Attack Plane.
And i also saw some Tornado GR4 It's Not a Really Figther Plane it's More like a Figther Bomber.
It's Control's Is slow But it got Much Capacity to Bomb's and Missle's
siaxis1 2 years ago
and the GR.4 can be used as a Jammer aircarft
pxiy321 2 years ago
E is for early
pxiy321 2 years ago
Народ, может подскажите как на английском "ядерный ракетоносец"? Аналогов в английском не нашел.
As in еnglish "The plane with nuclear missiles,... emm... tactical? As it on english?
Shmalexru 2 years ago
"Ядерный ракетоносец" даже на русском IMHO коряво звучит. Nuclear missiles carrier. ))) А если по аналогу, то nuclear bomber.
BorshCaen 1 year ago
This comments are pretty shitty :)
Su-22 (bomber) against F-15? WTF.
EWACS? WTF
MiG-29 isn't outdated, RU missiles were always better than NATO standard. (check technical data), MiG29 is able to acquire radar lock of F16 far more earlier than F-16 on MiG29. Compare sizes of these airplanes, which is bigger and easier to lock? On paper looks F-16 radar better, newer technology, but reality is different. Did you know that F-16 concept is from 1967?
teknobug 2 years ago
well said
mjufpn 1 year ago
good, please if you could show me that they used to mod or explosion or one of the massive bomb that used in the video, please
armetalic 2 years ago
From what I've seen, the allies won the Gulf Wars due to good strategy, good weapons and in the case of Desert Storm, good combat training.
kertaspaper94 2 years ago
At the end of the day, I'd rather be in the USAF then Voyenno-vozdushnye sily Rossii (Russian Air Force).
javakris 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my main video on youtube it actually is like this ,also artistic theme
Apeman1991 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
good work man
Apeman1991 2 years ago
Great video...
19NoOne90 2 years ago
that reminds me today is the 65 aniversy of d-day
usafisasome 2 years ago
First off, in the end of the video it says right there who the video was made by, secondly I agree with you Nazorgator that explosion gave me chills all over the places and then some, Can you imagion if a scenario like that really happened? ANd was announced to the world?
Cryton12345 2 years ago
stolen !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
solidlove12 2 years ago
OMG.that is the most beautiful lomac video i ever seen 5/5!!!!!!!!!
Navigator147 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey i got a problem with lockon this game worked on my computer then i had to reinstall it. then i got this. Microsoft visual c+++ runtime library
Runtime Error!
Program: am files(x86)\Ubisoft\EagleDynami cs\LockOn\LockOn.exe
This application has requested runtime to terminate it in an unusual
way.
Please contact the applicatons support team for more information.
i did contact them to no avail
any help anyone?
FutureMarine246 2 years ago
i wonder if theres nukes in lomac?
CA1CWilliams 2 years ago
Man the moment where the bomb is falling is giving me the chills
NazarovVv 2 years ago
Very Nice
ws119ne 3 years ago
I'm all about western air power but I git to admit , The TU-160 has got to be the prettiest angel of death the world has ever see'n !!! The thing in bigger than a b-52 and it's super sonic that's just fuck'n sexy !
Herbymac0811 3 years ago
The tu-160 isn't bigger than a b-52, just thought you should know. It is much more maneuverable, only problem is that it lights up a radar like fireworks.
AK04Tiger 3 years ago
I'll take a TU-160 over a B-1 any day, and I'll take a B-1 over a B-52 any day.
EinundzwanzigPanzer 2 years ago
I will agree with you completely, trust me. The Soviets and Russians have kick ass technology. Its funny sometime how people think western aircraft are better. There are so many aircraft in the Russian air force that make some of our planes look like flying piles of shit. For example the SU-22, Mikoyan 29 (Mig 29), but then again, each aircraft has one weak point which another turns into a strength.
AK04Tiger 2 years ago
Yeah, its funny how some people believe in Russian technology despite real war experience (Bekaa Valley, Desert Storm, Balkans). Su-22? Doesn't have the radar at all. MiG-29? Ask pilot how long it could remain in dogfight! The lack of fuel would enforce you to leave the fight - and then you get your ass kicked with missile!
maciejk71 2 years ago
I don't know about Bekaa Valley, but if you talked about the Desert Storm where 200 Western aircraft most of which were upgraded to the most advance avionic system and were covered by EWACS, and ECM. While Russian technology you mentioned was what? 40 out of dated Mig-29 most of them didn't even take off the ground? No radar guiding, no ECM supported. So, before you state your view, you should get some facts support, ok?
Gforce000 2 years ago 2
Gforce: what your point is? Are soviet airctaft better or worse than western?
The 1991 MiG's-29 we're not outdated (used
in Iraq since 1989, in USSR since 1985 in first line). They were not able to shoot down even single western aircraft, while having worse radar, worse missiles and lack of flexible command and control system. These are the facts. This is "superior" Russian technology.
maciejk71 2 years ago
I have some corrections to make on your comments my friend. First of all, how in the fuck is the su-22 going to lock onto a target without a radar and infra red friend or foe indicator? same goes for the mig 29. They both have radar that are just as effective as western radar technologies. Their medium range and bvr missiles match western capabilities. Oh and also a point, in the wars you mentioned earlier, the f-15 pilots happened to be flying against the mig 21,
AK04Tiger 2 years ago 10
@AK04Tiger WTF? Since when Su-22 have an radar? Maybe im uninformed or something but the only plane of Fitter's family which carried a radar equipement was Su-17 with Kvant-1 ranging radar i think.
adamlslda 1 year ago
so if you ask me, its lie putting a tiger and a house cat in a fight, then when the tiger wins, you assume that a tiger will also easily defeat a lion. so ill tell you what. when you realize that russion air force capabilites and western air force capabilities are in a stalemate, for the reason that where the west has weaknesses, the russions have strengths and vice versa. so there is a 50-50 chance that a f-15 would win a dogfight with a su-22.
AK04Tiger 2 years ago 9
@AK04Tiger the Su-22 is an attack bomber, thats like saying an F-15 has a 50-50 chance in taking an F-111. it would 50-50 if it was an F-15 and an Su-27 maybe.
Planetrix15 1 year ago 2
I will now correct my spelling of russian, by indicating that i have a new keyboard. i hate ergonomic keyboards, and ill change by the next time i comment i should think. shove my previous comments on a plate and eat it.
AK04Tiger 2 years ago
Only thing western has over Russian is EWACS...without that Russia would slaughter them.
Laxative120 2 years ago
Naw F-15 would pwn any Russian plane, and F-15E would deal with ground forces.
Planetrix15 2 years ago
F-15 is a kickass plane but you have to admit, it's HUGE. A smaller, more agile fighter could easily catch it.
Scorch1321 1 year ago
in terms of speed the only fighter faster than the F-15 is the MiG-25, and MiG-31, and they're even bigger and less monuverable.
ps. i spelled manuverable wrong, spell checks no help and i get D's in spelling :)
Planetrix15 1 year ago
mind you, that those planes are the highest flying planes on earth, the go just a 100 km/h slower than the blackbird, And the blackbird is a spyplane, no external weapons, the migs did had external weapons. sow don't beat the 25 and 31 down, remember the F15 was build on the same plans ast the 31. and it still aint as fast
Firefox2208 1 year ago
That is true, and the F-15 can only go Mach 1.78 with missals, but in terms of maneuverability and weapons systems the F-15 is superior.
Planetrix15 1 year ago
@Planetrix15 i cant believe im getting into this arguement but o well. the f 15 is good, but the su-27 would would make the f 15 its bitch. now, pit the f22 against ANY aircraft in the world, and well.... it wins, because you can't shoot something you can't see. but really russia and america are pretty much neck & neck with ANYTHING military ( except special forces because navy SEALs pwn anything) because we were so competitive. but now we're allies so who cares
yawnyman 1 year ago
@yawnyman im not going to argue because i know that no matter what you say it wont change my mind, and the goes for you. when someone picks out a favorite plane no one will chnage their mind so i respect your choice but i will stick with my choice. but your are right f-22 would just mess up anything in its way! :)
Planetrix15 1 year ago
Perso ALLEZ L'ARMEE DE L'AIR Vive les pilotes francais et tout le bordel et Vive les mirage 2000 MADE IN FRANCE BY DASSAULT AVIATION et vive la france voila
RedCoka 3 years ago
Alors toi, je suis fier de Dassault, ils ont fait des avions qui sont fort et vite. La France a un force militaire qui est tres eficace. Plus les soldats francais sont des meilleurs au monde.
AK04Tiger 3 years ago
nice vid :D
dbell91 3 years ago
reminds of ACE combat five missons
spart169 3 years ago
Great video. I really enjoyed. Just final explosion miss some fine mushroom.
tolik212 3 years ago
It's not his work.. and not his movie...
MMisi 3 years ago
yes you can see who made this video at the end of the movie.
Kamu0001 3 years ago
I already saw this video, when it made.
MMisi 3 years ago
Damn Great job nice video!
trufa12 3 years ago
wooooooooooow excellent video, great job,,,!!!
whitfurrows 3 years ago
搞不懂,F15给Tu160护航???
hotdogzo 3 years ago
海盗旗图160,战略核轰炸。
配乐是Evanescence的My Immortal
hotdogzo 3 years ago
海盗旗图160,战略核轰炸。
配乐是Evanescence的Evanescence。
hotdogzo 3 years ago
Final Flight of the White Swan.
bitrex 3 years ago
These bombers are designed to survive flashes of nuclear explosions. We all still remember that Tu 22 survived during test of 50 MT thermonuclear bomb. Here we can see just a small cruise missile - much less than 1 MT, and such missile, unlike any bomb able to hit target very far from the point of launch. So there is no chance for Tu160 to be injured by explosion.
tolik212 3 years ago
Brilliant video and great choice of music, truly stunning.
TAWGandalf 3 years ago
if a nuke is a war ender how come we can't use one now for this war?
kimelze 3 years ago
because if we did they will use thers against us and then other people will join in and that means the end of the world
dbell91 3 years ago
lol im suprised u asked that question. A nuke is more than a weapon, its a deterrent. If two sides have nukes and use them, then both sides will lose. Nukes are used to avoid wars, and very rarely, end them. If we used a nuke on iraq, u'd be killing more than the enemy. You cant chose who u kill with a nuke, so it will kill innocent lives. If war was that easy, this wouldnt be a problem. Great video btw!!!
ashaunt 3 years ago 2
that was to kimelze
ashaunt 3 years ago
Anti-Matter bombs >nukes
DarkHour404 2 years ago
You are just stupid
snedie69er 2 years ago
how am I stupid? why don't you try to show some background and facts on how I'm stupid before you call me stupid?
For all you know I might be twice as smart as you.
DarkHour404 2 years ago
Just the fact that you tried to refer to yourself as been "Twice" as smart as another person proves it all.
Was Einstein more clever than say a brain surgeon? No, he simply knew more in one field than the other.
Also your grammar sucks
snedie69er 2 years ago
Im gonna go ahead and stop this here before you reply to me and this ends up a argument on this guy's video.
And your just putting words into my mouth now,When was a "referring" to being smarter then you. I said I "Might for all you know" But I guess I maybe am since you cant understand that. And there is nothing wrong with my last comment in grammar, did I forget a comma?
This is over, but feel free to reply.
By the way, Loose some weight.
DarkHour404 2 years ago
Beautiful video,amazing,perfect! :D
I just love it :D
Alexandra995 3 years ago
Oh dude, amazing video, very nice work ;)
Lorddemonicus 3 years ago
Great video!
cimilimi 3 years ago
woah what happend to the B-1?
boeing747fly 4 years ago
Its not B-1 It's Tu-160
Marianivka 3 years ago
PURE GOLD!
londerium 4 years ago
very beautiful video and very good sond!!!
choun18 4 years ago
It's very very very good video/ Shit! i'm crying))!BEs!!!
Bonifacyi31 4 years ago
the nuke just isnt complete without a nice mushroom cloud at the end!! but ovewr all the video is very well done.
schamlzfaust2 4 years ago 2