is there anyone still out there who still goes along with the whole "fire brought down WTC7" fairytale? If so, then you need to prove how it could be possible
To my is quite clear that it was an insede job, but i always wonder about since when they had planned this, I mean, everything takes time to prepare and configure the explosive and they must did this in secret...
@wh1teflower It is easy Israel did it along with the bigwigs in Washington. Do you think muslims had the know how or the technology for something this big. The proof is all on You Tube from independents. Look how many times Israel as tried and succeeded to drag the US into war. Two examples USS Liberty and USS Cole. The men have not forgotten their deceased friends.
@manchester2000ful Individual names of the people that did it is what I meant, blaming Israel isn't the answer when 99 percent of the Israelis had nothing to do with it... What person was the mastermind that had the most influence in making this happen...
@wh1teflower 99% that is kinda high. There are ppl more powerful than the President of the US. Once instance the Rothschilds. They have their own secret organizations. Mossad and IDF are terrorist groups and they have the nerve to call the Taliban terrorists. Look at all the proof Israel did 9 11 and yet nothing is done about it. Scientists upon scientists have proven that explosives did 9 -11, yet it is debunked by the politicians.Why can nothing be said about Israel's human rights violations?
The best thing to do would be to rebuild the 3 identical skyscrapers in the desert! And then 2 airplanes (remote-controlled) hit the two twin towers with the same speed and location... and see what happens... For WTC7, put the exact fire in it and see what happens... That would be expensive though! But it would worth it since 9/11 was unprecedented in terms of building collapse and... unfortunately lost of lives.
@frankobjectif English scientists did that. Not to the extent of the height of the twin towers. Same materials, etc., could not be done with planes. Only explosives.. Bush lied he stated that 135 Israelis died, in fact there was only 1.
@frankobjectif It is on one of the videos. Come on look and listen to that goof. There is one video, 12 parts, but I have forgotten the name. I will take down your name and let u know when I find it. Have a good day.
@frankobjectif It is not speculation. Bush said 135 or 136, facts tell only one died. I believe I have given you the correct video, if not, I will get back to you.
@frankobjectif I think it is Israel did 9 -11 All the Proof in the World. Why did Silverstein tell his daughters not to go into work. How come the Mossad agents all failed lie detector tests? Mossad was conducting heavy duty espionage in the US yet all returned to Israel. As one Israeli told me yes we stole secrets and sold them to the Chinese. Doesn't USS Liberty, USS Cole ring a bell? That does not sound friendly to me
"To me in order to rule something out you have to check for it and find no trace"
People cleaning up the site we're experienced Demolition workers.
have you ever been to a demolition site? i have, when explosives are involved, blasting caps are strewn about EVERYWHERE, you can hardly walk without stepping on one.
And yet, no WTC photo shows them there... which means conventional explosives are out.
So "thermite"? Save it, lasers are just as likely by that logic.
@BaldurdashWoW ..so they predicted that plane can hit-but they couldn't predict that planes would knock off fire protection?.Well than ok- what"knock off the fire protection"in building 7?
An office fire 1800degrees? all jet fuel burned with in a few minutes+steel is a very good heat conductor...do you know what kills your theory?a symmetry of collapse.
/watch?v=9yIVoO376Bk
In level flight 767 would not go 540miles an hour at sea level.
I find it funny that everyone just believes that 2 planes going 500 miles an hour, smacking into the towers, would not cause any damage to the towers, and that the resulting pile up off all the office furniture would not burn to the 1800 degrees that it was reported to be, and that the fire alone would not weaken the steel. Also they claim that the two towers debris could not damage wtc7, even though firefighters said that wtc7 was damaged and leaning to one side. Truthers are idiots!
@griffinbird123 Um bro, there are reports done that SHOWED that the fires reached 1800 degrees! And yes, you are right, they were designed to survive the impact of a plane, meaning that they would not tip over when hit. But the force alone was so powerful, it shifted the towers, and is proven by witnesses who said the doors were jammed due to this. However, it was not designed to burn unchecked at 1800 degrees. The engineers did not know that a plane would knock off the fire protection.
@BaldurdashWoW honestly i could not find not one single shred of evidence supporting your claim. I am looking at the current moment but none of the fires have even reached 1800 degrees but i know that kerosene can.
if you can post a source of what you say then i will agree depending on the source
@griffinbird123 Oh wow, seriously, you are having problems finding sources? It is not that hard, type in "wtc 1800 degree fires" and there ya go. I can't sit here all day looking for something that you can find for yourself! Look at the angle from trinity church, you can see the buildings cave in, and the collapse begins.
@BaldurdashWoW no sir i am asking for a direct source to your claims because all i see is information pointing out that the fires DID NOT exceed 1800 or even reach it.
@SDupe44 "and have balls to post a phote" first I don't give a shit what your look like it is not a fact to prove your theory. Typical truther jump to completely unrelated topic when fact proves them wrong. And second yeah I saw your pic you look like a manly lesbian. Anyway still waiting for you to provide facts and your contact info you Keyboard Hero
@SDupe44 yeah you "need not watch my videos" because you prefer your edited bullshit. And if you choose not to watch then why the fuck did you ask to see one. Typical truther ask for something then refuse it because it proves them wrong. And shill congrats on being able to work in another truther phrase to one of your responses. You are really earning that tinfoil hat (continued)
@SDupe44 i know it buddy, 'weasel' is a paid cointelpro troll, hes not in denial, hes simply paid/threatened to do this, to peddle the 9/11 and 7/7 lie for 11 bucks an hour, ive been putting the racist shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) in their place for 3 years now, they cant explain away even 1 of the 100 impossibilities on 9/11 and 7/7! if you dont know about COINTELPRO google them! there are many STDs on youtube, they are soooo easy to spot, cheers for the heads up!!!
@wellifthemediasaysit so if you would like to make the claim that I am racist then provide one statement I ever made towards anyone's race or nationality or religion etc.
yeah you have nothing because I have never made any racists comments towards anyone I don't care where anyone is from just want to hear facts from you
Instead all we get is the same old twisted statements and made up lies that have nothing to do with WTC
@12weasel100 to take money to desperately peddle this ridiculous theory about crazed arabs armed with knives and fireproof passports who can make planes disappear and make towers turn to dust in mid air??? yes, thats disgusting vile racism, and you shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) actually try and make a living out of it!! truly sick son!! but do your job, and we will do ours, you STDs are merely a minor nuisance, nothing more, COINTELPRO only get what they pay for i guess....
@12weasel100 to take money to desperately peddle this ridiculous theory about crazed arabs armed with knives and fireproof passports who can make planes disappear and make towers turn to dust in mid air??? yes, thats disgusting vile racism, and you shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) actually try and make a living out of it!! truly sick son!! but do your job, and we will do ours, you STDs are merely a minor nuisance, nothing more, COINTELPRO only get what they pay for i guess....
SDupe44- "show me proof my vid is edited" ahahahhah there are two vids on my channel of the complete collapse of WTC7 proving your vids are edited. The clearly show the penthouse collasping first long before the outter unsupported wall falls. Truthers only ever show the last few secs of the outter wall no longer supported by the already collapsed interior supports falling.
That would be considered edited footage. One more of your points proven wrong. try another lie dumbass
@SDupe44 yeah again with the sheeple. I already responded to that on my channel you pussy. Funny you write shit on my channel but then block me from responding. Fucking pussy. And I already responded to your what you think you see in plain sight. Vids prove you wrong. And I already responding to your little crying threats. I am not afraid to tell it to your face just provide your contact info
@SDupe44 your request is pointless in proving your theory. Regardless of what anyone states it will never make your lies true. Typical fucking idiot truther thinks that by finding fault in what someone states will some how magically default all their shit into truth. Typical idiot truther cannot understand that as a presenter of a theory it is up to them regardless of what any other theory or statements are made the sole responsiblity of supporting the theory falls onto the presenter. You fail
@SDupe44 ahahahah more tough talk from the Keyboard warrior. ahahahah Ansswer one question Hero. if this has never happened before then how are you clarivouant enough to state then how exactly it should fall.
ahahahahah and what facts do you have to support it
And yes we would like to see facts. That is how theories are proven. What you think you can just spew out shit and hope that it is all magically true?? No it does not work that way you presented a theory it is up to you to support it with facts. Not the bullshit lies you spew out.
@SDupe44 we all find it odd that you spew out shit with no facts to support any of it. Last #s had about 1500 people in AETruth there are about 1.7 million engineers working in the US alone. We find it odd how you can state with certainty that these 1.7 million engineers that are not part of your shitty group are all working for the govt.
It is really odd how you assholes just make shit up
@SDupe44 ahahahah more deluded shit from a dumb fuck. Fucking pussy writing shit on my channel then blocking me from responding ahhahah you can check my channel for my response pussy.
And wish you could "choke them out" sure I will tell you to your face you are a dumb fuck. just provide your contact info and I will come by and tell you how fucking stupid you are. You retarded sack of dog shit.
@SDupe44 wow you clearly are a dumbshit that cannot read you clearly have your head up your asshole you dumb shit. No tower fell straight down. Besides your point is useless based on your own arguments "this never happened before" (which is not true but I will pretend) so based on your own argument of never happened before how the fuck do you know how it should fall then?? Shit you truthers are a sad pile of ignorant shit.
the weasel method Q; how does an office fire ghet steel red hot? A: "there was more than office material in there" Q: O.K. like what? weasel Answer "" office material" "you couldn't make this shit up
Hey 12weasel100, you sound concerned about non-factual arguments having to do with these murders. Arguments made by folks who have done no more than sign on to YouTube. I share your concern. So let's include folks who signed on, not here, but to defend the US, failed, then brought non-factual argument about these murders - that Atta met Iraqis, in Prague. Cheney spat in and re-liquified this bullshit for 6 years. Go ahead - start choosing your swear-words so they're ready when you foam over.
"won't let you make points" ahahahhaha I have already told you I am here listening and waiting for you to start making FACTUAL points. So far you have made no relevant points. All you have done is asked questions that even a 4yr would no the answer to and spewed out lies and incorrect data. So go ahead make your points dumb fuck but make factual ones. If you continue with the shit you are spewing out then you are just a fucking moron.
Well, they've admitted that building 7 was "pulled" now. Pulled means professionally demolished. God bless their sweet little souls, they say that they did it because there had been such a tremendous loss of life that day.
@amishnation pretty sad after 10yrs you are still trying to use that "pulled" bullshit argument. Silverstein never had the authority to make decissions that day it was under the controll of the NYFD. Silverstein also states THEY meaning NYFD not HE (meaning himself) and the term PULL IT was clearly directed towards the fire dept operation. Your argument is not only illogical but it is weak and pathetic you sad fucking fool
@amishnation pretty sad after 10yrs you are still trying to use that "pulled" bullshit argument. Silverstein never had the authority to make decissions that day it was under the controll of the NYFD. Silverstein also states THEY meaning NYFD not HE (meaning himself) and the term PULL IT was clearly directed towards the fire dept operation. Your argument is not only illogical but it is weak and pathetic you sad fucking fool
why would people even be surprised that the us would do this to their country?? when the bush administration and rockefeller's basically funded both sides of ww2.. and bush sr trained arabs that eventually became alqaeda.. why don't people just read a history book.. then maybe you'll all understand the dark side of humanity.
"As for air escaping there was alot of tunnels and concourse below to absorb this event."
What the Hell? Pal, the ENTIRE building was collasping, that INCLUDES "tunnels and concourses".
And no, the air would travel to any point of least resistance, which for MOST would be the windows, some of it was directed into stairways and such, yes, which meant air escaped even more VIOLENTLY out of those places every so often.
@12weasel100 Care to back up your argument with legitimate information? Or are you just an uneducated fool who generalizes people and cannot compose an argument on any topic .
@XmadmanREBornX it is easy to back up my conclusion. Just go to any 911 video and start reading the idiotic comments truthers make. Truthers spew out shit with no facts to support it and believe that opinions, speculation, innuendo, edited footage and lies are all supposed to prove their garabage. Since they cannot tell the difference between that and fact are all proven facts on why a Truther is a fucking idiot.
"Care to back up your argument with legitimate information?"
I can, I work in the aviation industry, which takes 9/11 as a case study to elaborate on ad naseum as to what went wrong and how to prevent it.
I also lived in D.C., and had family at the Pentagon, thus I know more about that side, then I do the Towers. However, I do know enough in total that puts the issue to rest.
@12weasel100 so Retarded monkeys is the official name of the boxcutter conspiracy side? Nice to put a name to a face. I think the truthers are much more intelligent than you retarded monkeys personally
Why "boxcutter"? They also had mace, pepper spray, tear gas, and mock-up if not real bombs.
You'd also have to put the entire Aviation Industry under that label, which is kind of odd, considering they're in the best position to know what went wrong on 9/11, if only because they did the most studies, and were directly involved.
@MarshallLore you can believe what you like but your opinion is worthless shit just like your theory. Facts clearly prove that truthers are fucking idiots.
@12weasel100 I see. Well I guess we'll have to wait a few decades for this to be declassified. While we're waiting please google Operation Northwoods which has been declassified already. Seriously take a look please
@MarshallLore wait a few decades???? Yeah so pretty much you have nothing and cannot support any of your bullshit with facts. Thanks for confirming that.
@12weasel100 so you read Operation Northwoods already then? And by the way welcome to an adult conversation where we debate not see who can say fuck the most
"so you read Operation Northwoods already then? "
I doubt you have, did you know Operation NorthWood, did NOT call for the killing of American citizens?
NOT for ANY American buildingS to be destroyed?
And that the moment it was proposed, it was also dismissed? You know why? It was apart of the Bay of Pigs invasion, which was a PUBLIC embarrassment to the administration.
And like all public embarrassments, anything attached to it, loses support.
@MarshallLore yeah I really don't give a shit what your politcal philosophy is regarding Operation Northwoods what we would like to hear is you provide proven facts to clearly prove WTC was controlled demo. Seems like you are not able to do so. Looks like you are just another typical rambling fucking idiot truther. You dumb fuck
@12weasel100 my political philosophy?? lol that was a military document signed by the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff not my personal philosopy. you didnt read it did you. ok relax with the "dumb fuck" attitude please youre better than that. There are many pieces of evidence i was just walking you through one by one to show that the military would consider that.
@12weasel100 youre too dumb to have anything explained to you so here is basic stuff even a feeble minded person like yourself can understand
When you cook your dinner do you worry that the spider burners will melt? when you turn on a kerosene heater do you worry that it will melt? No? that's cos they are made of steel so they cant melt? Beyond that I think the concepts will be too difficult for you. Keep "dumb fucking" your way around a conversation like a fool
@MarshallLore Northwoods was my first point out of a list of dozens but I can't get into a real list with you because your mind can't focus past the 1st one which I'm sure you still havent read
@MarshallLore (continued) and Northwoods was your first point but you can't get past it. Yeah you can''t get past it because you cannot logically explain it. Typical truther wants to fire off a long list of shit points but will not logically explain any of them one at a time. Shit you are a dumb fuck.
@12weasel100 you know what just fuck off if you dont want a real conversation. Ive tried to be reasonable with you and havent sworn even though you swear at me on every post. You wanna talk steel frame structures check my post to Alaskaslim. Im done with you. Get your IQ rated please and when it comes back as 90 you will know you dont belong in an adult conversation
@MarshallLore Dont want a real conversation????? I have told you many times I am more than willing to listen to proven facts that support your theory. I have asked you for facts and you provide shit. I have read your posts to Alaskaslim and your questions are those that a 2yr old woudl ask and you never provided facts (just asked typical truther questions but never answered any question) Clearly you cannot support the shit you spew out. That makes you an idiot.
@12weasel100 you my friend are an idiot for not questioning the drivel you are spoon fed and won't listen to anybody with another point of view. Im really done talking with you cos you won't let me make my points even if i wanted to talk to you. no need to reply. so goodbye and its been a slice.
@MarshallLore take hint you have no facts to support your bullshit. Your view point is fucked and you have no way of supporting it. I tried to have a "conversation" with you by pointing out the many errors and lies you told however in typical truther fashion you ignored it because you would prefer to live with your head up your asshole. So you going to try providing fact now or are you just going to continue acting like a retard with shit for brains???
@MarshallLore so basically your response proves that not only are you a fucking idiot when it comes to science and engineering but you are not a metallurogist either. You comparison of a stove to WTC steel is bullshit. If you want to make a comparison then compare other steel framed structures that were on fire. If you did then you would see that many steel framed structures can and have collapsed due to fire. You clearly are a dumb fuck
I can't wait for the people who are so ignorant of the governments doings, and naive enough to believe the government to walk right into the FEMA concentration camps in a few year, TRY TO USE YOUR BRAIN so when the gov does strike, we'll be ready
FEMA is largely gone from the Katrina area. People like yourself claimed that military authority would be declared for the entire nation out of Katrina, yet that never materialized, nor did Bush install himself as a dictator.
I know people who have legitimate concerns about Government encroachment on human rights, yet don't take your "apocalypse now" approach, could be that maybe, just maybe, you're exaggerating here?
To the friends of A&E. No university, its faculties, engineering associations and architects supports the conspiracy of A & E. The same in Asia, Oceania, Canada, Europe and South America. The list below is today. I have the link of all. Always find more on the internet. There evidence against the towers and WTC7. Only 0.001% of U.S. engineers are in A & E. Without the universities, the A&E will never convince the U.S. Congress to reopen anything. The conspiracy was born defeated
HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***
All three buildings were rigged, not just #7. Inside job from the get go. How can people be so ignorant not to see the obvious. (Hope I get a good seat at the FEMA camp)
If so, why didn't all the windows blow out during the collaspe? That's what happens at demolition buildings, thanks to all the displaced air.
Further, why did the main towers collapse one floor at a time, not all at once? The former is a big Demolition no no, as you lose control that way of where debris falls.
Lastly, why are they so QUIET? Buildings half the size of WTC were FAR louder when demolished.
@Alaskaslim I'm no engineer however if one can't tell these towers were rigged as they fell into a compressed pile of rubble in a cloud of yellow dust (thermate by product.)
As for air escaping there was alot of tunnels and concourse below to absorb this event.
Government is not concerned with collateral damage, they just offed 3800 people.
Thermate IS quiet, unlike copper clad charges.Google pic of cross in wtc rubble, looks cut like a torch was used. Thermate does that, not fire.
1. The primary by products of Thermate are Aluminum Oxide, and Barium Nitrate.
The truth movements comes foreward with all these samples saying "ah ha! This proves such and such", and yet, they have NEVER found the PRIMARY by products.
At 10 pounds for every 1 pound of steel, as Stephen Jones estimated, it would be impossible to hide, people at the scene would have been awashed in it.
2. Thermite has never been used to bring down a building.
Fire has made steel collapse, this happened at every WTC building, and the Madrid Tower.
I can give you a list of other buildings where this has happened, do you want it?
Regardless, fire has made buildings collapse, and thermite has not. The regard that the latter is somehow more "reasonable" than the former, is false.
@Alaskaslim Can i have the list? The Madrid tower burned over 50 floors for a full day and the steel structure didnt fall btw. Once the fire was out the steel skeleton remained and had to be demolished so not sure what youre talking about with that. WTC burned over 5 floors for 2 hours.
@Alaskaslim If steel "fails" then there would be a gradual bending of the beams which would lower the top section gradually to the undamaged section rather than a sudden and total collapse. Speaking of thrown debris how do you explain the lateral ejections of large sections of the towers under a gravity collapse? ps Im enjoying having a civilised conversation with you without insults. something that 12weasel couldnt understand. so thank you for a real debate
@MarshallLore (continued) and if you want a conversation then yes if steel "fails" there is gradual bending of sections etc. There is clear vids of the towers bowing inward at the point of fires as the trusses failled and bent inward. At exact moment of collapse the columns twist and bend inward. This is all supported by eyewittness clearly making statements about the towers are leaning the towers are in trouble etc etc. If you want a convo then use facts and know what you are talking about.
@MarshallLore (continued) and if you want a conversation here you go .The Madrid Tower was CONCRETE CORE you idiot. Far different from STEEL FRAME. The top 11 floors of Madrid Tower that were STEEL DID COLLAPSE very similar to WTC7. If you want to see it happen just go to my channel and watch the vid Torre molten metal at 2:30 there is a clear close up of this happening clearly proving that steel frame structures can and do collapse from fire alone. You sad little retard.
@Alaskaslim Btw when an old building needs to be brought down why do they bring in expensive explosives experts to do controlled demolition? why dont they just put some jet fuel in and set fire???? Check out implosion world videos seems they are wasting a lot of money pulling buildings with explosives.when all they needed was a lighter and a tank of jet fuel??? they dont do this because they know it wouldnt work.
"why dont they just put some jet fuel in and set fire????"
Simple: Collateral damage, the WTC 1 & 2 collaspe caused a lot of it, including all the other WTC buildings, $1.2 Billion to the Verizon building, and St. Paul's church
When you demolish a building, you want to limit thrown debris as much as possible.
@Alaskaslim "Thermite has never been used to bring down a building." We can agree to disagree on this one as I believe it brought down three buildings that day. There would be skeleton of a STEEL building, not a compressed pile of dust. Those bldgs were rigged during the three month prior to event "elevator upgrades" by outsourced crew. (The on site crew was told to stay out of their way). The load bearing structural iron was at the center of the towers, walled off from public areas.
It Thrills me to know im far more intelligent than these Bazzoos, if one is going to scientifically analyze an event like 911 all physical elements must be present for scrutiny.
2 of the Elements over looked here are :
1 - The fact these bldgs. were BOLTED TOGETHER.
2 - The Air inside Towers 1 and 2 inability to escape and aiding as a air hammer down force - A force so strong powered by each succeeding collapsed floor.
This can be proven in a lab, i challenge Twooffers to prove me wrong.
9-11 is too big to be a conspiracy. Literally, hundreds, if not thousands, would have had to been involved. It is sad to see some of my heroes, like Hunter S. Thompson, buying into this mumbo jumbo. A more realistic take is the one we already know; the CIA and Bush knew there was an attack about to go down and they simply did nothing. Acting like the Towers was some sort of a pyrotechnic spectacle/CGI fantasy is simply ridiculous. If you believe this, you have watched way too much "24".
@78aquaman !00 of our best Army engineer types had months alone in the elevator areas (core of all structural iron) as an "upgrade" was being done. The on site maintenance workers were told to stay out of their way. Once that core was compromised, the collapse started. Thermate continued to sever critical joints of 3" thick steel to collapse these towers into a compressed pile of rubble. No skeleton what so ever of the STEEL framework and you don't wonder why? Too obvious to me here.
@tornspeedo ..Where did you get this information? I would be more than happy to give you credit but you don't even cite a source. Until then, I will remain skeptical, as I am in almost all conspiracy theories. What you are suggesting is that the Army of Engineers planted explosives...I find that truly hard to believe. I am not saying it is impossible...I just have a hard time excepting that. By the way, isn't it thermite?
@78aquaman It would be thermite however the dust had components of nano thermate in it which is strictly for military use. I believe it's thermite with added phosphorous and sulfur. Be skeptical if you wish, I will cite no sources other than to say I have never been on Al Jezeera. I am going off numerous sources because I have read a lot and retained most of it. It's just too obvious, the off white yellow smoke from the tower "collapses" and bldg seven just shouldn't have been there.
The Military has TH3, thermate, there is no such thing as "nano thermate".
There is "nano thermite", but it is still experimental, and it's not intended for use in explosives. If you want to know what nano thermite is really, I can give you a source.
"thermite with added phosphorous and sulfur"
Sulfur is just 2%, and can be found from other things, the primary by products of Thermate are Aluminum Oxide and Barium Nitrate. Neither have been found.
@Alaskaslim trust you to be on here, alaskafarewell, desperately peddling the official lies for a few bucks an hour, we all know about cointelpro, 9/11 was a blatant inside job, keep the BS realistic at least!!
Why do you use that name? I contacted you first with Alaskaslim, which is also my oldest account. Since the youtube changes a year and a half ago, which slave the youtube accounts to google, I haven't used that one.
@Alaskaslim 13. wtc steel quickly sent overseas 14. explosions seen and heard throughout wtc 1,2 and 7 demolition 15. highjackers alive and well 16. highjackers not on original flight manifests 17. reports of wtc7 demolition 20 mins before it happened 18. strange 'deaths' of aaron russo, barry jennings, robin cook, david kelly, john o'neill and bill cooper. 19.no pics or vids of any airliner colours on 9/11 20. wtc power downs few days prior to 9/11, so many more, answer or i just keep asking!
@Alaskaslim once more, pls explain...1.put options, 2.molten steel, 3.PNACs 'we need a new pearl harbor' 4.fireproof passports and bandana 5. nose out shot 6.bush claiming to have seen 1st drone impact live! 7. missing plane at pentagon 8. missing plane in shanksville 9.wtc7! 10. cheney and rumsfeld saying 93 was shot down! 10. NORAD standdown 11. nanothermite found 12. ppl hearing wtc basement blow up b4 any drone hit 12. core steel columns clearly sliced through, continued....
@Alaskaslim how can i yell??? by typing? i dont even use capslock!!! in other words 'no i cant explain away any of your 70 impossibilities on 9/11, because they are all absolutely true, i can however, use the words 'paranoid, delusional, twooftard etc' over and over!!! sound about right alaskafarewell? what do u care if ppl spread the real truth about 9/11? why does that bother you so much if your not a 'paid cointelpro shill'?? please explain?? or feel free to run away, like u usually do!!
@Alaskaslim u ran away again, so i simply repeat... in other words 'no i cant explain away any of your 70 impossibilities on 9/11, because they are all absolutely true, i can however, use the words 'paranoid, delusional, twooftard etc' over and over!!! sound about right alaskafarewell? what do u care if ppl spread the real truth about 9/11? why does that bother you so much if your not a 'paid cointelpro shill'?? please explain?? or feel free to run away, like u usually do!!
@Alaskaslim yeah this dumbass wellifthemediasaysit does the same thing with me. I have proven him incorrect on many points and have asked him numerous times to provide sources, facts and logically explain all his statements and all he can to is cry and keep copying and pasting his list that he never logically explains or provides sources or facts for. He is a pretty sad typical truther idiot.
please would you shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) explain away the 70 impossibilities on 9/11!!! were still waiting, we all know about cointelpro!! you desperately peddle the official lie for a few bucks an hour!!! great!!! answer or i just keep asking....
@wellifthemediasaysit wow that was quite a little rant. Congrats you managed to work in several key truther phrases, rant alot but say absolutely nothing and provide absolutely no facts all in one little response. You really are earning your little tin foil hat.
@12weasel100 you paid COINTELPRO shills can use the keywords 'paranoid, delusional, crackpots' etc etc...zzz....so u still cant explain away the 70 plus impossibilities on 9/11??? not even 1??? jeeez COINTELPRO only get what they pay for i guess!!! we all know full well 9/11 was an inside job and we all know about COINTELPRO!!!
@wellifthemediasaysit wow more Truther phrases you really are earning that little tin foil hat. And you still cannot logically explain any of the 70 plus lies you listed. Still waiting for your logical explination based on fact. You dumbass
@12weasel100 explain away wtc7, molten steel, put options, nanothermite, NORAD standdown, fireproof passport, PNACs 'we need a new pear harbor', missing planes at pentagon and in penns, nose out shot, so many more, explain them away, stupid paid COINTELPRO shill, answer or i just keep asking....
@wellifthemediasaysit yes I keep asking you to explain those statements. Why do you keep repeating my request??? I guess it is because you cannot logically explain it.
Congrats on more truther bullshit you really earning your little tin foil hat today.
@12weasel100 explain away wtc7, molten steel, put options, nanothermite, NORAD standdown, fireproof passport, PNACs 'we need a new pear harbor', missing planes at pentagon and in penns, nose out shot, so many more, explain them away, stupid paid COINTELPRO shill, answer or i just keep asking....
Two words shill: MOLTEN ALUMINUM! If a postcard can survive the Hindenburg inferno certainly a passport can survive 911. 130 witnesses saw flight 77 gullible troll. 95% of flight 93 debris was recovered moron. NORAD never was told to stand down. Fake nanothermite paper was never peer reviewed. Bombs in the basement when the buildings failed at the point of imapct? Talk about violating the laws of physics!
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
@Stu3100 who says an airliner hit the pentagon?? only 'were getting reports that another plane may have hit the pentagon'.....reports?? from whom?? the 'eyewitnesses'?? rumsfeld said 'missile' tim roemer said 'missile' and charlie lewis said 'missile', though other 'initial reports' say truck bomb!! theres certainly no evidence of an airliner, and the 2 cctv vids dont show an airliner, so no airliner hit, regardless of what contradictory made up eyewitnesses say!!
This list is today. Notice that I have more universities in Western Europe, Asia, Oceania, Canada and South America all the conspiracy against the lies and the A & E and its 1500. Since even 10% are engineers. They will never convince the U.S. Congress without the support of the Universidad U.S..
I present the list of universities, its academics and U.S. engineering associations that are against the lies of the A & E and the conspiracy of 9 / 11.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
National Council of Structural Engineers Associations,
@aczjbr ~ So these universities are in agreement with NIST that "office fires" brought down WTC 7? C'mon, man! Think! Have they seen the presentation made by AE911truth(dot)org or are they deliberately avoiding evidence that contradicts the people who give them humongous grant money?
@ucancallmeOh Hello! Think? In my country no university accepts its demolition. Me and all my country's best engineers we are sure that the A & E stupid liars. Only communists, religious fanatics and paranoids who believe in the Illuminati conspiracy are like you. You are insulting the engineering world. The honor of the universities with .
@ucancallmeOh the Yankees isn´t Iran and Pakistan.You Fascist! Hitler in 1934 and Mao Tse Tung in the Cultural Revolution were like you.Silence the universities. Dozens of U.S. engineering academics against his paranoid fantasy.They aren´t like you, corrupt and without honor.These scholars have jobs at my university library and all the
@ucancallmeOh world.They will be remembered by the conscience that lies must not prevail.This is worldwide.I'll send the updated list of universities from 5 continents against you, the demolition, Mr.V.entura and lies A&E
@ucancallmeOh MIT Alliance, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, China
Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Department of Architectural Engineering, SungKyunKwan University, Engineering Building, Cheoncheon-dong, Jangan-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
is there anyone still out there who still goes along with the whole "fire brought down WTC7" fairytale? If so, then you need to prove how it could be possible
stelley08 4 days ago
To my is quite clear that it was an insede job, but i always wonder about since when they had planned this, I mean, everything takes time to prepare and configure the explosive and they must did this in secret...
argjmg 1 week ago
may everyone pray that justice is served... and let these people be exposed...
wh1teflower 2 weeks ago 2
@wh1teflower It is easy Israel did it along with the bigwigs in Washington. Do you think muslims had the know how or the technology for something this big. The proof is all on You Tube from independents. Look how many times Israel as tried and succeeded to drag the US into war. Two examples USS Liberty and USS Cole. The men have not forgotten their deceased friends.
manchester2000ful 5 days ago
@manchester2000ful Individual names of the people that did it is what I meant, blaming Israel isn't the answer when 99 percent of the Israelis had nothing to do with it... What person was the mastermind that had the most influence in making this happen...
wh1teflower 4 days ago
@wh1teflower 99% that is kinda high. There are ppl more powerful than the President of the US. Once instance the Rothschilds. They have their own secret organizations. Mossad and IDF are terrorist groups and they have the nerve to call the Taliban terrorists. Look at all the proof Israel did 9 11 and yet nothing is done about it. Scientists upon scientists have proven that explosives did 9 -11, yet it is debunked by the politicians.Why can nothing be said about Israel's human rights violations?
manchester2000ful 4 days ago
The best thing to do would be to rebuild the 3 identical skyscrapers in the desert! And then 2 airplanes (remote-controlled) hit the two twin towers with the same speed and location... and see what happens... For WTC7, put the exact fire in it and see what happens... That would be expensive though! But it would worth it since 9/11 was unprecedented in terms of building collapse and... unfortunately lost of lives.
frankobjectif 2 weeks ago
@frankobjectif You could use scale models but I think the planes would simply bounce off.
stratocaster539 5 days ago
@frankobjectif English scientists did that. Not to the extent of the height of the twin towers. Same materials, etc., could not be done with planes. Only explosives.. Bush lied he stated that 135 Israelis died, in fact there was only 1.
manchester2000ful 5 days ago
@manchester2000ful Indeed Bush lied. On what basis you speculate that only one jew died?
frankobjectif 4 days ago
@frankobjectif It is on one of the videos. Come on look and listen to that goof. There is one video, 12 parts, but I have forgotten the name. I will take down your name and let u know when I find it. Have a good day.
manchester2000ful 4 days ago
@frankobjectif It is not speculation. Bush said 135 or 136, facts tell only one died. I believe I have given you the correct video, if not, I will get back to you.
manchester2000ful 4 days ago
@frankobjectif I think it is Israel did 9 -11 All the Proof in the World. Why did Silverstein tell his daughters not to go into work. How come the Mossad agents all failed lie detector tests? Mossad was conducting heavy duty espionage in the US yet all returned to Israel. As one Israeli told me yes we stole secrets and sold them to the Chinese. Doesn't USS Liberty, USS Cole ring a bell? That does not sound friendly to me
manchester2000ful 4 days ago
I guess that fire in wtc7 must have been setting off explosives since everyone heard them and they are recorded on video.
Surprise surprise!
The official investigation didnt even check for explosives and ruled them out when thats the most obvious thing it is.
To me in order to rule something out you have to check for it and find no trace.
I could say the sky doesnt exist if I dont even look at it and dont accept proof.
zenoist2 3 weeks ago
@zenoist2
"To me in order to rule something out you have to check for it and find no trace"
People cleaning up the site we're experienced Demolition workers.
have you ever been to a demolition site? i have, when explosives are involved, blasting caps are strewn about EVERYWHERE, you can hardly walk without stepping on one.
And yet, no WTC photo shows them there... which means conventional explosives are out.
So "thermite"? Save it, lasers are just as likely by that logic.
Alaskaslim 2 weeks ago
The physics of 9/11 are a total joke if you take the official explanation seriously.
Due to fire HAHAHAHAHA
It would be funny if it hadnt been used as a pretext to invade Iraq and then seriously curtail American citizens rights.
Patriot act anyone?
War in Iraq anyone when Osama wasnt even there?
WMDs anyone?
Its never happened before and it never will again.
Show me one single building that has collapsed like this from fire before or after 9/11.
zenoist2 3 weeks ago 2
@BaldurdashWoW ..so they predicted that plane can hit-but they couldn't predict that planes would knock off fire protection?.Well than ok- what"knock off the fire protection"in building 7?
An office fire 1800degrees? all jet fuel burned with in a few minutes+steel is a very good heat conductor...do you know what kills your theory?a symmetry of collapse.
/watch?v=9yIVoO376Bk
In level flight 767 would not go 540miles an hour at sea level.
/watch?v=V5zvCdD9D1A&feature=related
/watch?v=btcEJQac82A
krzysg1982 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@krzysg1982
"In level flight 767 would not go 540miles an hour at sea level."
ANOTHER 911 TWOOFER LIE
Yes, it is recommended that 767s do not travel 540 mph at sea level because it's not safe for the passengers or buildings the plane may hit.
Nice try liar!
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 3 weeks ago
I find it funny that everyone just believes that 2 planes going 500 miles an hour, smacking into the towers, would not cause any damage to the towers, and that the resulting pile up off all the office furniture would not burn to the 1800 degrees that it was reported to be, and that the fire alone would not weaken the steel. Also they claim that the two towers debris could not damage wtc7, even though firefighters said that wtc7 was damaged and leaning to one side. Truthers are idiots!
BaldurdashWoW 1 month ago
@BaldurdashWoW but none of the fires burned at 1800 degrees so what? also the building was designed to withstand an airplane hit just watch this
"WTC built specifically to withstand multiple crashes"
griffinbird123 1 month ago
@griffinbird123 Um bro, there are reports done that SHOWED that the fires reached 1800 degrees! And yes, you are right, they were designed to survive the impact of a plane, meaning that they would not tip over when hit. But the force alone was so powerful, it shifted the towers, and is proven by witnesses who said the doors were jammed due to this. However, it was not designed to burn unchecked at 1800 degrees. The engineers did not know that a plane would knock off the fire protection.
BaldurdashWoW 1 month ago
@BaldurdashWoW honestly i could not find not one single shred of evidence supporting your claim. I am looking at the current moment but none of the fires have even reached 1800 degrees but i know that kerosene can.
if you can post a source of what you say then i will agree depending on the source
griffinbird123 1 month ago
@griffinbird123 Oh wow, seriously, you are having problems finding sources? It is not that hard, type in "wtc 1800 degree fires" and there ya go. I can't sit here all day looking for something that you can find for yourself! Look at the angle from trinity church, you can see the buildings cave in, and the collapse begins.
BaldurdashWoW 1 month ago
@BaldurdashWoW no sir i am asking for a direct source to your claims because all i see is information pointing out that the fires DID NOT exceed 1800 or even reach it.
griffinbird123 1 month ago
@griffinbird123 h t t p : / / w w w. nist. gov/ el/ disasterstudies/ wtc/ faqs_ wtctowers. cfm
Look at number 6 there bro. How hard was that to find? Have you actually read the report?
BaldurdashWoW 1 month ago
@SDupe44 "and have balls to post a phote" first I don't give a shit what your look like it is not a fact to prove your theory. Typical truther jump to completely unrelated topic when fact proves them wrong. And second yeah I saw your pic you look like a manly lesbian. Anyway still waiting for you to provide facts and your contact info you Keyboard Hero
12weasel100 1 month ago
@SDupe44 yeah you "need not watch my videos" because you prefer your edited bullshit. And if you choose not to watch then why the fuck did you ask to see one. Typical truther ask for something then refuse it because it proves them wrong. And shill congrats on being able to work in another truther phrase to one of your responses. You are really earning that tinfoil hat (continued)
12weasel100 1 month ago
@SDupe44 i know it buddy, 'weasel' is a paid cointelpro troll, hes not in denial, hes simply paid/threatened to do this, to peddle the 9/11 and 7/7 lie for 11 bucks an hour, ive been putting the racist shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) in their place for 3 years now, they cant explain away even 1 of the 100 impossibilities on 9/11 and 7/7! if you dont know about COINTELPRO google them! there are many STDs on youtube, they are soooo easy to spot, cheers for the heads up!!!
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@wellifthemediasaysit so if you would like to make the claim that I am racist then provide one statement I ever made towards anyone's race or nationality or religion etc.
yeah you have nothing because I have never made any racists comments towards anyone I don't care where anyone is from just want to hear facts from you
Instead all we get is the same old twisted statements and made up lies that have nothing to do with WTC
You are sad you pahtetic fool
12weasel100 1 month ago
@12weasel100 to take money to desperately peddle this ridiculous theory about crazed arabs armed with knives and fireproof passports who can make planes disappear and make towers turn to dust in mid air??? yes, thats disgusting vile racism, and you shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) actually try and make a living out of it!! truly sick son!! but do your job, and we will do ours, you STDs are merely a minor nuisance, nothing more, COINTELPRO only get what they pay for i guess....
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@wellifthemediasaysit so again with the racism comment?? Again you make the claim but cannot provide support for it. You are truly sick son
12weasel100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@12weasel100 to take money to desperately peddle this ridiculous theory about crazed arabs armed with knives and fireproof passports who can make planes disappear and make towers turn to dust in mid air??? yes, thats disgusting vile racism, and you shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) actually try and make a living out of it!! truly sick son!! but do your job, and we will do ours, you STDs are merely a minor nuisance, nothing more, COINTELPRO only get what they pay for i guess....
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@12weasel100 Even if someone is racist, their view cannot be thrown out. We call it an Ad Hominem.
BaldurdashWoW 1 month ago
SDupe44- "show me proof my vid is edited" ahahahhah there are two vids on my channel of the complete collapse of WTC7 proving your vids are edited. The clearly show the penthouse collasping first long before the outter unsupported wall falls. Truthers only ever show the last few secs of the outter wall no longer supported by the already collapsed interior supports falling.
That would be considered edited footage. One more of your points proven wrong. try another lie dumbass
12weasel100 1 month ago
@SDupe44 yeah again with the sheeple. I already responded to that on my channel you pussy. Funny you write shit on my channel but then block me from responding. Fucking pussy. And I already responded to your what you think you see in plain sight. Vids prove you wrong. And I already responding to your little crying threats. I am not afraid to tell it to your face just provide your contact info
You just repeated the same old shit
ahahahah you Key Board Warrior
12weasel100 1 month ago
@SDupe44 your request is pointless in proving your theory. Regardless of what anyone states it will never make your lies true. Typical fucking idiot truther thinks that by finding fault in what someone states will some how magically default all their shit into truth. Typical idiot truther cannot understand that as a presenter of a theory it is up to them regardless of what any other theory or statements are made the sole responsiblity of supporting the theory falls onto the presenter. You fail
12weasel100 1 month ago
@SDupe44 ahahahah more tough talk from the Keyboard warrior. ahahahah Ansswer one question Hero. if this has never happened before then how are you clarivouant enough to state then how exactly it should fall.
ahahahahah and what facts do you have to support it
SDupe44 the Keyboard Warrior of You Tube
12weasel100 1 month ago
And yes we would like to see facts. That is how theories are proven. What you think you can just spew out shit and hope that it is all magically true?? No it does not work that way you presented a theory it is up to you to support it with facts. Not the bullshit lies you spew out.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@SDupe44 we all find it odd that you spew out shit with no facts to support any of it. Last #s had about 1500 people in AETruth there are about 1.7 million engineers working in the US alone. We find it odd how you can state with certainty that these 1.7 million engineers that are not part of your shitty group are all working for the govt.
It is really odd how you assholes just make shit up
you keyboard warrior.
12weasel100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SDupe44 ahahahah more deluded shit from a dumb fuck. Fucking pussy writing shit on my channel then blocking me from responding ahhahah you can check my channel for my response pussy.
And wish you could "choke them out" sure I will tell you to your face you are a dumb fuck. just provide your contact info and I will come by and tell you how fucking stupid you are. You retarded sack of dog shit.
12weasel100 1 month ago
Comment removed
12weasel100 1 month ago
@SDupe44 wow you clearly are a dumbshit that cannot read you clearly have your head up your asshole you dumb shit. No tower fell straight down. Besides your point is useless based on your own arguments "this never happened before" (which is not true but I will pretend) so based on your own argument of never happened before how the fuck do you know how it should fall then?? Shit you truthers are a sad pile of ignorant shit.
12weasel100 1 month ago
the weasel method Q; how does an office fire ghet steel red hot? A: "there was more than office material in there" Q: O.K. like what? weasel Answer "" office material" "you couldn't make this shit up
fillyferz 1 month ago
This guy's pretty stupid for a physicist. Thermite. LOL.
llanbo 1 month ago
Hey 12weasel100, you sound concerned about non-factual arguments having to do with these murders. Arguments made by folks who have done no more than sign on to YouTube. I share your concern. So let's include folks who signed on, not here, but to defend the US, failed, then brought non-factual argument about these murders - that Atta met Iraqis, in Prague. Cheney spat in and re-liquified this bullshit for 6 years. Go ahead - start choosing your swear-words so they're ready when you foam over.
newsmanbluesman 1 month ago
"won't let you make points" ahahahhaha I have already told you I am here listening and waiting for you to start making FACTUAL points. So far you have made no relevant points. All you have done is asked questions that even a 4yr would no the answer to and spewed out lies and incorrect data. So go ahead make your points dumb fuck but make factual ones. If you continue with the shit you are spewing out then you are just a fucking moron.
12weasel100 1 month ago
Well, they've admitted that building 7 was "pulled" now. Pulled means professionally demolished. God bless their sweet little souls, they say that they did it because there had been such a tremendous loss of life that day.
amishnation 1 month ago
@amishnation pretty sad after 10yrs you are still trying to use that "pulled" bullshit argument. Silverstein never had the authority to make decissions that day it was under the controll of the NYFD. Silverstein also states THEY meaning NYFD not HE (meaning himself) and the term PULL IT was clearly directed towards the fire dept operation. Your argument is not only illogical but it is weak and pathetic you sad fucking fool
12weasel100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@amishnation pretty sad after 10yrs you are still trying to use that "pulled" bullshit argument. Silverstein never had the authority to make decissions that day it was under the controll of the NYFD. Silverstein also states THEY meaning NYFD not HE (meaning himself) and the term PULL IT was clearly directed towards the fire dept operation. Your argument is not only illogical but it is weak and pathetic you sad fucking fool
12weasel100 1 month ago
@amishnation
"Pulled means professionally demolished."
No, Pull, according to 11 different demolition companies who work in the NYC area, is not an industry term.
This result appeared in a demolition industry magazine.
This is where "pull it" comes from, and I'm sad to say it's rather lame:
/watch?v=43F54hR0NW8
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
why would people even be surprised that the us would do this to their country?? when the bush administration and rockefeller's basically funded both sides of ww2.. and bush sr trained arabs that eventually became alqaeda.. why don't people just read a history book.. then maybe you'll all understand the dark side of humanity.
prodigy051985 1 month ago
@tornspeedo
"As for air escaping there was alot of tunnels and concourse below to absorb this event."
What the Hell? Pal, the ENTIRE building was collasping, that INCLUDES "tunnels and concourses".
And no, the air would travel to any point of least resistance, which for MOST would be the windows, some of it was directed into stairways and such, yes, which meant air escaped even more VIOLENTLY out of those places every so often.
Seriously, this was bad science on your part.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@12weasel100 Care to back up your argument with legitimate information? Or are you just an uneducated fool who generalizes people and cannot compose an argument on any topic .
XmadmanREBornX 1 month ago
@XmadmanREBornX it is easy to back up my conclusion. Just go to any 911 video and start reading the idiotic comments truthers make. Truthers spew out shit with no facts to support it and believe that opinions, speculation, innuendo, edited footage and lies are all supposed to prove their garabage. Since they cannot tell the difference between that and fact are all proven facts on why a Truther is a fucking idiot.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@XmadmanREBornX
"Care to back up your argument with legitimate information?"
I can, I work in the aviation industry, which takes 9/11 as a case study to elaborate on ad naseum as to what went wrong and how to prevent it.
I also lived in D.C., and had family at the Pentagon, thus I know more about that side, then I do the Towers. However, I do know enough in total that puts the issue to rest.
So by all means, ask me something.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@12weasel100 so Retarded monkeys is the official name of the boxcutter conspiracy side? Nice to put a name to a face. I think the truthers are much more intelligent than you retarded monkeys personally
MarshallLore 1 month ago
@MarshallLore
"boxcutter conspiracy side? "
Why "boxcutter"? They also had mace, pepper spray, tear gas, and mock-up if not real bombs.
You'd also have to put the entire Aviation Industry under that label, which is kind of odd, considering they're in the best position to know what went wrong on 9/11, if only because they did the most studies, and were directly involved.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@MarshallLore you can believe what you like but your opinion is worthless shit just like your theory. Facts clearly prove that truthers are fucking idiots.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@12weasel100 I see. Well I guess we'll have to wait a few decades for this to be declassified. While we're waiting please google Operation Northwoods which has been declassified already. Seriously take a look please
MarshallLore 1 month ago
@MarshallLore wait a few decades???? Yeah so pretty much you have nothing and cannot support any of your bullshit with facts. Thanks for confirming that.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@12weasel100 so you read Operation Northwoods already then? And by the way welcome to an adult conversation where we debate not see who can say fuck the most
MarshallLore 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MarshallLore
"so you read Operation Northwoods already then? "
I doubt you have, did you know Operation NorthWood, did NOT call for the killing of American citizens?
NOT for ANY American buildingS to be destroyed?
And that the moment it was proposed, it was also dismissed? You know why? It was apart of the Bay of Pigs invasion, which was a PUBLIC embarrassment to the administration.
And like all public embarrassments, anything attached to it, loses support.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@MarshallLore yeah I really don't give a shit what your politcal philosophy is regarding Operation Northwoods what we would like to hear is you provide proven facts to clearly prove WTC was controlled demo. Seems like you are not able to do so. Looks like you are just another typical rambling fucking idiot truther. You dumb fuck
12weasel100 1 month ago
@12weasel100 my political philosophy?? lol that was a military document signed by the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff not my personal philosopy. you didnt read it did you. ok relax with the "dumb fuck" attitude please youre better than that. There are many pieces of evidence i was just walking you through one by one to show that the military would consider that.
MarshallLore 1 month ago
@MarshallLore what you believe about Operation Northwood is not facts to prove controlled demo. Try again you dumb fuck.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@12weasel100 youre too dumb to have anything explained to you so here is basic stuff even a feeble minded person like yourself can understand
When you cook your dinner do you worry that the spider burners will melt? when you turn on a kerosene heater do you worry that it will melt? No? that's cos they are made of steel so they cant melt? Beyond that I think the concepts will be too difficult for you. Keep "dumb fucking" your way around a conversation like a fool
MarshallLore 1 month ago
@MarshallLore Northwoods was my first point out of a list of dozens but I can't get into a real list with you because your mind can't focus past the 1st one which I'm sure you still havent read
MarshallLore 1 month ago
@MarshallLore (continued) and Northwoods was your first point but you can't get past it. Yeah you can''t get past it because you cannot logically explain it. Typical truther wants to fire off a long list of shit points but will not logically explain any of them one at a time. Shit you are a dumb fuck.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@12weasel100 you know what just fuck off if you dont want a real conversation. Ive tried to be reasonable with you and havent sworn even though you swear at me on every post. You wanna talk steel frame structures check my post to Alaskaslim. Im done with you. Get your IQ rated please and when it comes back as 90 you will know you dont belong in an adult conversation
MarshallLore 1 month ago
@MarshallLore Dont want a real conversation????? I have told you many times I am more than willing to listen to proven facts that support your theory. I have asked you for facts and you provide shit. I have read your posts to Alaskaslim and your questions are those that a 2yr old woudl ask and you never provided facts (just asked typical truther questions but never answered any question) Clearly you cannot support the shit you spew out. That makes you an idiot.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@12weasel100 you my friend are an idiot for not questioning the drivel you are spoon fed and won't listen to anybody with another point of view. Im really done talking with you cos you won't let me make my points even if i wanted to talk to you. no need to reply. so goodbye and its been a slice.
MarshallLore 1 month ago
@12weasel100 take a hint from Alaskaslim and debate people with a different point of view instead of going straight to fuck you like a teenager.
MarshallLore 1 month ago
@MarshallLore take hint you have no facts to support your bullshit. Your view point is fucked and you have no way of supporting it. I tried to have a "conversation" with you by pointing out the many errors and lies you told however in typical truther fashion you ignored it because you would prefer to live with your head up your asshole. So you going to try providing fact now or are you just going to continue acting like a retard with shit for brains???
12weasel100 1 month ago
@MarshallLore so basically your response proves that not only are you a fucking idiot when it comes to science and engineering but you are not a metallurogist either. You comparison of a stove to WTC steel is bullshit. If you want to make a comparison then compare other steel framed structures that were on fire. If you did then you would see that many steel framed structures can and have collapsed due to fire. You clearly are a dumb fuck
12weasel100 1 month ago
I can't wait for the people who are so ignorant of the governments doings, and naive enough to believe the government to walk right into the FEMA concentration camps in a few year, TRY TO USE YOUR BRAIN so when the gov does strike, we'll be ready
jandreasik1 1 month ago
@jandreasik1
"FEMA concentration camps in a few year,"
FEMA is largely gone from the Katrina area. People like yourself claimed that military authority would be declared for the entire nation out of Katrina, yet that never materialized, nor did Bush install himself as a dictator.
I know people who have legitimate concerns about Government encroachment on human rights, yet don't take your "apocalypse now" approach, could be that maybe, just maybe, you're exaggerating here?
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To the friends of A&E. No university, its faculties, engineering associations and architects supports the conspiracy of A & E. The same in Asia, Oceania, Canada, Europe and South America. The list below is today. I have the link of all. Always find more on the internet. There evidence against the towers and WTC7. Only 0.001% of U.S. engineers are in A & E. Without the universities, the A&E will never convince the U.S. Congress to reopen anything. The conspiracy was born defeated
aczjbr 1 month ago
Comment removed
aczjbr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ImplosionworldCom
American Institute of Steel Construction Inc, Chicago (AISC),
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 123,000 members
American Institute of Architects (AIA), 80,000 members
Association of de Wall & Ceiling Industry, 2.000 members that are primarily wall and ceiling contractors
American Concrete Institute (ACI), 20,000 members spanning 108 countries.
aczjbr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
American Council Of Engineering Companies (ACEC), 6,000 independent engineering companies
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 120,000 members
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 35,000 members
American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), 40,000 members
American Standards Institute (ANSI), 125 mil empresas e 3.500 mil members.
Department of Design and Construction (DDC) in NY,1,200 members
aczjbr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
International Metallographic Society,
Institute of Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEAoNY),
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 370,000 members
Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 15,000 members
National Council of Structural Engineers Associations, (NCSEA), 12 mil members,
National Fire Protection Association, (NFPA), 70,000 individuals around the world,
Structural Engineering Institute, (SEI),
aczjbr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Society for Fire Protection Engineering, (SFPE),
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Engineering Department,
Northwestern University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Engineering Department,
University of California, Engineering Department,
National Academy of Engineering,
University of Pennsylvania, Engineering Department,
University of Maryland, Department of Fire Protection Engineering,
aczjbr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Stanford University, Engineering Department,
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, Engineering Department,
State University of New York at Buffalo, Engineering Department,
University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Natural and Applied Sciences,
University of Perdue, School of Civil Engineering,
University of Arizona, Engineering Department,
University of Colorado, Engineering Department,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
aczjbr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
University of Akron, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Michigan State University, Engineering Department
University of Texas at El Paso, Department of Computer Science & Department of Public Administration
University of Delaware, Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice
Cornell University, Department of Engineering
Washington State University; Department of Political Science and Criminal Justice
University of Louisville, Department of Urban and Public Affairs
aczjbr 1 month ago
HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***
MCSnicks 1 month ago
@MCSnicks ahahahahahah looks like you are trolling here too. ahahahahaha
Truthers- the real trolls.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@MCSnicks
"HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? "
What about it? The report for it was released three years ago, did you read it?
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
All three buildings were rigged, not just #7. Inside job from the get go. How can people be so ignorant not to see the obvious. (Hope I get a good seat at the FEMA camp)
tornspeedo 2 months ago
@tornspeedo
"All three buildings were rigged, not just #7."
If so, why didn't all the windows blow out during the collaspe? That's what happens at demolition buildings, thanks to all the displaced air.
Further, why did the main towers collapse one floor at a time, not all at once? The former is a big Demolition no no, as you lose control that way of where debris falls.
Lastly, why are they so QUIET? Buildings half the size of WTC were FAR louder when demolished.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim I'm no engineer however if one can't tell these towers were rigged as they fell into a compressed pile of rubble in a cloud of yellow dust (thermate by product.)
As for air escaping there was alot of tunnels and concourse below to absorb this event.
Government is not concerned with collateral damage, they just offed 3800 people.
Thermate IS quiet, unlike copper clad charges.Google pic of cross in wtc rubble, looks cut like a torch was used. Thermate does that, not fire.
tornspeedo 1 month ago
@tornspeedo
"(thermate by product.)"
1. The primary by products of Thermate are Aluminum Oxide, and Barium Nitrate.
The truth movements comes foreward with all these samples saying "ah ha! This proves such and such", and yet, they have NEVER found the PRIMARY by products.
At 10 pounds for every 1 pound of steel, as Stephen Jones estimated, it would be impossible to hide, people at the scene would have been awashed in it.
2. Thermite has never been used to bring down a building.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim neither has fire
MarshallLore 1 month ago
@MarshallLore
Fire has made steel collapse, this happened at every WTC building, and the Madrid Tower.
I can give you a list of other buildings where this has happened, do you want it?
Regardless, fire has made buildings collapse, and thermite has not. The regard that the latter is somehow more "reasonable" than the former, is false.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim Can i have the list? The Madrid tower burned over 50 floors for a full day and the steel structure didnt fall btw. Once the fire was out the steel skeleton remained and had to be demolished so not sure what youre talking about with that. WTC burned over 5 floors for 2 hours.
MarshallLore 1 month ago
@MarshallLore
"and the steel structure didnt fall btw."
Half of it did, the lower half stood because of a cement core, something the WTC did not have.
As for the list:
debunking911 . com/firsttime . htm
Fire has made steel fail (not melt, FAIL, learn the difference), it's something history confirms.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim If steel "fails" then there would be a gradual bending of the beams which would lower the top section gradually to the undamaged section rather than a sudden and total collapse. Speaking of thrown debris how do you explain the lateral ejections of large sections of the towers under a gravity collapse? ps Im enjoying having a civilised conversation with you without insults. something that 12weasel couldnt understand. so thank you for a real debate
MarshallLore 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MarshallLore
"If steel "fails" then there would be a gradual bending of the beams"
Yes it did, and in the videos, you can pickout the WTC bending inward long before the eventual break. It's so clear it's measurable.
Here's what I mean:
/watch?v=bMZ-nkYr46w#t=2m2s
"how do you explain the lateral ejections of large sections"
Simple, supports didn't give at the same moment, some failed before others.
Others in fact, didn't fail at all (at least not at first). 40 floors stood.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim
I have to go now.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@MarshallLore (continued) and if you want a conversation then yes if steel "fails" there is gradual bending of sections etc. There is clear vids of the towers bowing inward at the point of fires as the trusses failled and bent inward. At exact moment of collapse the columns twist and bend inward. This is all supported by eyewittness clearly making statements about the towers are leaning the towers are in trouble etc etc. If you want a convo then use facts and know what you are talking about.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@MarshallLore (continued) and if you want a conversation here you go .The Madrid Tower was CONCRETE CORE you idiot. Far different from STEEL FRAME. The top 11 floors of Madrid Tower that were STEEL DID COLLAPSE very similar to WTC7. If you want to see it happen just go to my channel and watch the vid Torre molten metal at 2:30 there is a clear close up of this happening clearly proving that steel frame structures can and do collapse from fire alone. You sad little retard.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim Btw when an old building needs to be brought down why do they bring in expensive explosives experts to do controlled demolition? why dont they just put some jet fuel in and set fire???? Check out implosion world videos seems they are wasting a lot of money pulling buildings with explosives.when all they needed was a lighter and a tank of jet fuel??? they dont do this because they know it wouldnt work.
MarshallLore 1 month ago
@MarshallLore
"why dont they just put some jet fuel in and set fire????"
Simple: Collateral damage, the WTC 1 & 2 collaspe caused a lot of it, including all the other WTC buildings, $1.2 Billion to the Verizon building, and St. Paul's church
When you demolish a building, you want to limit thrown debris as much as possible.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim "Thermite has never been used to bring down a building." We can agree to disagree on this one as I believe it brought down three buildings that day. There would be skeleton of a STEEL building, not a compressed pile of dust. Those bldgs were rigged during the three month prior to event "elevator upgrades" by outsourced crew. (The on site crew was told to stay out of their way). The load bearing structural iron was at the center of the towers, walled off from public areas.
tornspeedo 1 month ago
@tornspeedo
"We can agree to disagree on this one"
You miss my meaning, if the WTC was brought down by thermite, it be the first time in history that has happened.
It would not however be the first time steel supports failed due to fire, that has happened before & after.
"There would be skeleton of a STEEL building"
There was, for a few minutes after the collapse, do wish for me to show you?
"The on site crew was told to stay out of their way"
And your proof of this is?
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
9d7YgOM-fug
Merry Christmas Neo-cons!
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago
Comment removed
aczjbr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ucancallmeOh Enough for today. Different time zone. I have to wake up early for work. Have a happy new year in peace with health and prosperity.
aczjbr 2 months ago
terrorists killed 3000 innocent people .we killed more than 100000 innocent people in iraq.
myrightway1 2 months ago
DON'T WORRY, EVIDENCE WILL COME OUT SOON ENOUGH BECAUSE AMERICA ISN'T STUPID AND WE WONT LET THIS JUST GO.
justincredibleguy 2 months ago 2
J.F.K.- 911 All about ( GUN CONTROL }
UTBoneSkuLLUT 2 months ago
It Thrills me to know im far more intelligent than these Bazzoos, if one is going to scientifically analyze an event like 911 all physical elements must be present for scrutiny.
2 of the Elements over looked here are :
1 - The fact these bldgs. were BOLTED TOGETHER.
2 - The Air inside Towers 1 and 2 inability to escape and aiding as a air hammer down force - A force so strong powered by each succeeding collapsed floor.
This can be proven in a lab, i challenge Twooffers to prove me wrong.
SkuIICrusherGhost 2 months ago
9-11 is too big to be a conspiracy. Literally, hundreds, if not thousands, would have had to been involved. It is sad to see some of my heroes, like Hunter S. Thompson, buying into this mumbo jumbo. A more realistic take is the one we already know; the CIA and Bush knew there was an attack about to go down and they simply did nothing. Acting like the Towers was some sort of a pyrotechnic spectacle/CGI fantasy is simply ridiculous. If you believe this, you have watched way too much "24".
78aquaman 2 months ago
@78aquaman !00 of our best Army engineer types had months alone in the elevator areas (core of all structural iron) as an "upgrade" was being done. The on site maintenance workers were told to stay out of their way. Once that core was compromised, the collapse started. Thermate continued to sever critical joints of 3" thick steel to collapse these towers into a compressed pile of rubble. No skeleton what so ever of the STEEL framework and you don't wonder why? Too obvious to me here.
tornspeedo 1 month ago
@tornspeedo ..Where did you get this information? I would be more than happy to give you credit but you don't even cite a source. Until then, I will remain skeptical, as I am in almost all conspiracy theories. What you are suggesting is that the Army of Engineers planted explosives...I find that truly hard to believe. I am not saying it is impossible...I just have a hard time excepting that. By the way, isn't it thermite?
78aquaman 1 month ago
@78aquaman It would be thermite however the dust had components of nano thermate in it which is strictly for military use. I believe it's thermite with added phosphorous and sulfur. Be skeptical if you wish, I will cite no sources other than to say I have never been on Al Jezeera. I am going off numerous sources because I have read a lot and retained most of it. It's just too obvious, the off white yellow smoke from the tower "collapses" and bldg seven just shouldn't have been there.
tornspeedo 1 month ago
@tornspeedo
"nano thermate"
The Military has TH3, thermate, there is no such thing as "nano thermate".
There is "nano thermite", but it is still experimental, and it's not intended for use in explosives. If you want to know what nano thermite is really, I can give you a source.
"thermite with added phosphorous and sulfur"
Sulfur is just 2%, and can be found from other things, the primary by products of Thermate are Aluminum Oxide and Barium Nitrate. Neither have been found.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim trust you to be on here, alaskafarewell, desperately peddling the official lies for a few bucks an hour, we all know about cointelpro, 9/11 was a blatant inside job, keep the BS realistic at least!!
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@wellifthemediasaysit
"trust you to be on here, alaskafarewell"
Why do you use that name? I contacted you first with Alaskaslim, which is also my oldest account. Since the youtube changes a year and a half ago, which slave the youtube accounts to google, I haven't used that one.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim 13. wtc steel quickly sent overseas 14. explosions seen and heard throughout wtc 1,2 and 7 demolition 15. highjackers alive and well 16. highjackers not on original flight manifests 17. reports of wtc7 demolition 20 mins before it happened 18. strange 'deaths' of aaron russo, barry jennings, robin cook, david kelly, john o'neill and bill cooper. 19.no pics or vids of any airliner colours on 9/11 20. wtc power downs few days prior to 9/11, so many more, answer or i just keep asking!
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim once more, pls explain...1.put options, 2.molten steel, 3.PNACs 'we need a new pearl harbor' 4.fireproof passports and bandana 5. nose out shot 6.bush claiming to have seen 1st drone impact live! 7. missing plane at pentagon 8. missing plane in shanksville 9.wtc7! 10. cheney and rumsfeld saying 93 was shot down! 10. NORAD standdown 11. nanothermite found 12. ppl hearing wtc basement blow up b4 any drone hit 12. core steel columns clearly sliced through, continued....
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@wellifthemediasaysit
"once more, pls explain."
No, each time I do explain you just yell at me and call me a moron.
You never DEBATE with me, you just troll.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim how can i yell??? by typing? i dont even use capslock!!! in other words 'no i cant explain away any of your 70 impossibilities on 9/11, because they are all absolutely true, i can however, use the words 'paranoid, delusional, twooftard etc' over and over!!! sound about right alaskafarewell? what do u care if ppl spread the real truth about 9/11? why does that bother you so much if your not a 'paid cointelpro shill'?? please explain?? or feel free to run away, like u usually do!!
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@wellifthemediasaysit
I don't have time for trolls, get your kicks elsewhere.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Alaskaslim u ran away again, so i simply repeat... in other words 'no i cant explain away any of your 70 impossibilities on 9/11, because they are all absolutely true, i can however, use the words 'paranoid, delusional, twooftard etc' over and over!!! sound about right alaskafarewell? what do u care if ppl spread the real truth about 9/11? why does that bother you so much if your not a 'paid cointelpro shill'?? please explain?? or feel free to run away, like u usually do!!
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@Alaskaslim yeah this dumbass wellifthemediasaysit does the same thing with me. I have proven him incorrect on many points and have asked him numerous times to provide sources, facts and logically explain all his statements and all he can to is cry and keep copying and pasting his list that he never logically explains or provides sources or facts for. He is a pretty sad typical truther idiot.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@12weasel100
He's not an idiot, he's a troll. He says obviously stupid things, just to get a rise out of people, pay him no mind.
Alaskaslim 1 month ago
please would you shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) explain away the 70 impossibilities on 9/11!!! were still waiting, we all know about cointelpro!! you desperately peddle the official lie for a few bucks an hour!!! great!!! answer or i just keep asking....
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@wellifthemediasaysit wow that was quite a little rant. Congrats you managed to work in several key truther phrases, rant alot but say absolutely nothing and provide absolutely no facts all in one little response. You really are earning your little tin foil hat.
12weasel100 1 month ago
@12weasel100 you paid COINTELPRO shills can use the keywords 'paranoid, delusional, crackpots' etc etc...zzz....so u still cant explain away the 70 plus impossibilities on 9/11??? not even 1??? jeeez COINTELPRO only get what they pay for i guess!!! we all know full well 9/11 was an inside job and we all know about COINTELPRO!!!
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@wellifthemediasaysit wow more Truther phrases you really are earning that little tin foil hat. And you still cannot logically explain any of the 70 plus lies you listed. Still waiting for your logical explination based on fact. You dumbass
12weasel100 1 month ago
@12weasel100 explain away wtc7, molten steel, put options, nanothermite, NORAD standdown, fireproof passport, PNACs 'we need a new pear harbor', missing planes at pentagon and in penns, nose out shot, so many more, explain them away, stupid paid COINTELPRO shill, answer or i just keep asking....
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@wellifthemediasaysit yes I keep asking you to explain those statements. Why do you keep repeating my request??? I guess it is because you cannot logically explain it.
Congrats on more truther bullshit you really earning your little tin foil hat today.
12weasel100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@12weasel100 explain away wtc7, molten steel, put options, nanothermite, NORAD standdown, fireproof passport, PNACs 'we need a new pear harbor', missing planes at pentagon and in penns, nose out shot, so many more, explain them away, stupid paid COINTELPRO shill, answer or i just keep asking....
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@wellifthemediasaysit
Two words shill: MOLTEN ALUMINUM! If a postcard can survive the Hindenburg inferno certainly a passport can survive 911. 130 witnesses saw flight 77 gullible troll. 95% of flight 93 debris was recovered moron. NORAD never was told to stand down. Fake nanothermite paper was never peer reviewed. Bombs in the basement when the buildings failed at the point of imapct? Talk about violating the laws of physics!
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 1 month ago
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
@wellifthemediasaysit
enlighten us, what hit the pentagon then? just that 137 eyewitnesses seen an aircraft, no-one seen anything else.
Stu3100 1 month ago
@Stu3100 who says an airliner hit the pentagon?? only 'were getting reports that another plane may have hit the pentagon'.....reports?? from whom?? the 'eyewitnesses'?? rumsfeld said 'missile' tim roemer said 'missile' and charlie lewis said 'missile', though other 'initial reports' say truck bomb!! theres certainly no evidence of an airliner, and the 2 cctv vids dont show an airliner, so no airliner hit, regardless of what contradictory made up eyewitnesses say!!
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
Imagine that; it's on Al Jezeera
78aquaman 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This list is today. Notice that I have more universities in Western Europe, Asia, Oceania, Canada and South America all the conspiracy against the lies and the A & E and its 1500. Since even 10% are engineers. They will never convince the U.S. Congress without the support of the Universidad U.S..
aczjbr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Continuing the list:
University of Maryland,
Stanford University,
Society of Fire Protection Engineers,
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts,
American Institute of Steel Construction Inc, Chicago
State University of New York at Buffalo,
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay,
University of Perdue.
aczjbr 2 months ago
I present the list of universities, its academics and U.S. engineering associations that are against the lies of the A & E and the conspiracy of 9 / 11.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
National Council of Structural Engineers Associations,
American Council Of Engineering Companies,
Structural Engineering Institute,
Northwestern University,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
University of California,
National Academy of Engineering,
University of Pennsylvania
aczjbr 2 months ago
@aczjbr ~ So these universities are in agreement with NIST that "office fires" brought down WTC 7? C'mon, man! Think! Have they seen the presentation made by AE911truth(dot)org or are they deliberately avoiding evidence that contradicts the people who give them humongous grant money?
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago
Comment removed
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh Hello! Think? In my country no university accepts its demolition. Me and all my country's best engineers we are sure that the A & E stupid liars. Only communists, religious fanatics and paranoids who believe in the Illuminati conspiracy are like you. You are insulting the engineering world. The honor of the universities with .
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh the Yankees isn´t Iran and Pakistan.You Fascist! Hitler in 1934 and Mao Tse Tung in the Cultural Revolution were like you.Silence the universities. Dozens of U.S. engineering academics against his paranoid fantasy.They aren´t like you, corrupt and without honor.These scholars have jobs at my university library and all the
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh world.They will be remembered by the conscience that lies must not prevail.This is worldwide.I'll send the updated list of universities from 5 continents against you, the demolition, Mr.V.entura and lies A&E
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh
Division of Architecture, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si, Kangwon-do, Republic of Korea
Division of Architecture, Sun Moon University, Kalsan-ri, Tangjeong-myeon, Asan-si, Chungnam, Republic of Korea
Department of Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Chunchun-Dong, Jangan-Gu, Suwon, Kyunggi-Do, Republic of Korea
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh MIT Alliance, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, China
Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Department of Architectural Engineering, SungKyunKwan University, Engineering Building, Cheoncheon-dong, Jangan-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh Now the universities in Asia against the conspiracy of 9/11 and A&E truth:
Incredible! Communists defending the honor of the U.S. against the A&E. It no longer as formerly communist.
Qinghua University, a comprehensive institute of science and engineering, Beijing, China
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh OCEANIA
Council of the Australian Institute of Steel Construction (CAISC), Australia
Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council (AFAC), Australia
University of Sydney, Department of Civil Engineering, Australia
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh
Mechanical Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI), UK
ITSEMAP Servicios Tecnológicos MAPFRE, Spain
Higher Polytechnic School Universidad San Pablo, CEU, Spain
School of Civil Engineering, Channels and Ports of the Basque Country, Spain
University of Valladolid, Department of Strength of Materials, Spain
University de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Technical College, Spain
Institute of fire and security technology, Denmark
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, UK
University of Liverpool, Centre for Investigative Psychology, UK. This is for anyone Who believes in demolition.
University of Greenwich, Fire Safety Engineering Group (FSEG) & School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, UK
University of Ulster, Faculty of Engineering & FireSERT, UK
UK Atomic Energy Agency, (UKAEA).
University of Newcastle, Civil Engineering Department, Uk
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh University of Munich, Institute of Statistics, Germany
Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Germany
Vienna University of Technology, Austria.
School of Engineering and Electronics, University of Edinburgh, UK
Cambridge University Engineering Department (CUED), UK
University of Newcastle, Civil Engineering Department, UK
University of Oxford, Department of Materials, UK
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh Up-to date. did not look Italian, Polish, Dutch, Czech, Hungarian and others. The list will be huge against the A&E.
Université Montpellier II, Laboratoire de Mécanique et Génie Civil, France
Centre d'Elaboration des Matériaux et d'Etude Structurale (CEMES),.France
Centre Scientifique et Technique du Batiment, France
Civil and Structural Engineering department at the Ecole des Ponts et Chaussées, Paris, france
Centre scientifique et technique du bâtiment (CSTB), Paris , France:
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh Now universities and research centers in Western Europe . The conspiracy and the A & E and their lies.
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh BRAZIL
Veiga de Almeida University (UVA), Faculty of Engineering, Rio de Janeiro
University of São Paulo (USP), Polytechnic School, Sao Paulo
Institute of Engineering of São Paulo (IESP), Sao Paulo
Military Institute of Engineering (IME), Rio de Janeiro
Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCAR), Faculty of Engineering, Sao Paulo
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Faculty of Engineering, Rio de Janeiro
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh Now in South America against the conspiracy of 9/11 A&E truth.
Career Institute of Materials Engineering, National Addiction Sabato of the Universityof General San Martin, Argentina
Department of seismic isolation and energy dissipation SIRVE, Chile
National Atomic Energy Agency, Argentina
aczjbr 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh
University of Arizona, Engineering Department
University of Colorado, Engineering Department
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
University of Akron, Department of