this is retarded,the pressure of water already in the bottle is higher than the pressure of water exerted to inside the bottle,basically u wear pouring water form the bottle to the container lol
@ShinobiLB400 Technically not. Because there was no gas to take the place of the water the water couldn't escape the bottle. Try it, fill your sink with water then pull a cup upside out of the water. The water won't drain until the opening clears the surface.
well you aren't making energy....you are just taking energy from electricity to make the hydrogen.....its takes the same amount of energy to split water into hydrogen as you get when you burn the hydrogen....also....try getting 10 amps using the sun
Do you even know how much hydrogen it takes to be energy equivalent to a gallon of gasoline? You do the math! And what do you think they are using to make electricity? How about coal, natural gas, and nuclear. When cars run on hydrogen it won't be using a tank full of diatomic hydrogen... that is too dangerous....
as i recall, there are cars running on fuel cells which use hydrogen...
no one said you should make hydrogen by waisting energy from your battery or home outlet, you can use solar panels or wind generator and some other things...
Yes there are experimental cars with hydrogen fuel cells. The storage tanks are too dangerous and it's been said that it could be 20 years before they are safe. This video on HHO is not about fuel cells. The term "HHO" is a fraud. Look it up on Google.
They labeled this video HHO. That is an unscientific term for a mixture of diatomic hydrogen and diatomic oxygen. You can't use this mixture for fuel cells. It has to be pure hydrogen. They should have separated the anode and cathode so that they collect only hydrogen and then not labeled this video as HHO.
1987 V-6 S-10 pickup running dual 250 amp alternator A custom made by Rick Laurence (godsfuel) 260 amp ccpwm set at 175 amps constant, 4 gens 20 SS plates in each in town driving 195 mpg, hwy millage untested.
well what if it was producing that ammount all day.. and stored in a tank. then all u have to do is adjust the size of the tank. soo that a full tank would give you 200 or more miles.. and while you are driving, your home is generating more in the spare tank.. alowing for you to collect as many tanks as you want.
you need 400 cu/ft of gas to run the same mileage as 1 gallon of gas 20mpg that would be 20cu/ft per mile so to run 200 mile it would need 4000 cu/ft of storage in comparison a 100 lbs hydrogen tank that is used for welding has 219 cu/ft in it OR about 12 miles of fuel so you would need 20 of those tanks to go 200 miles besides there isn't enough physical volume in a cylinder to hold 3/4 of a liter of gas per power stroke UNLESS it is pressure injected
this is impressive prduction. However, I am assuming here, your meter reads 70+ volts and 50+ amps @ 4.8 liters per minute. Thats 797.5 watts per liter per minute. That is double what others here have produced. You need to be around 300 watts per liter per minute to be usefull.
Why don't most of these guys ever say what amps their using up ! making this much gas is the easiest thing in the world, making it efficiently is another story. So, what's the amps ?
Any hydrogen generator caped off and allowed time to build up pressure will do a similar output for a short period of time. run a straight tube from that thing and lets see what you have.
I use 304 grade stainless. To make sure its pure, use a magnet, if it sticks or tries to stick, its no good, that means its susceptible to rust. I'm using that grade for an electrolysis unit, so far its been used for an hour and has been in the water for nearly 2-3 weeks, still no rust
stainless if I'm not mistaken has some steel in it. Iron tends to turn red or orange or brown when oxidized. You may notice discoloration from the oxidizing terminal or electrode.
Thanks cribcat1 for your reply, yeah I was wondering if this was the case but this seems to be more than discoloration, it looks more like I've invented a new kind of tea making machine, with the tea leaves still inside!...
I thought it was the water but I did a test with graphite (carpenter pencil leads) and even with the high mineral content in my water there was no brown scum or discoloration.
Graphite hay?, very interesting, Yeah maybe I need to look at a different metal, maybe titanium or something, someone else just told me it was the water and that I needed to use distilled water, wonder if the location might be an issue (water quality), I live in Australia, what about you?
I'm in America and my tap water comes from a well. Does your water smell funny? If not it may be the plates. Copper gives off a greenish scum when used as an electrode if I remember correctly. Another way of testing your metal is to use a strong magnet if you feel an attraction force then there is iron in the metal.
p.s. if You take a lead acid battery and refill it with tap water, charge it, does it turn brown? Everyone I know claims that you must use distilled. Does the sulfuric acid react with the battery electrolyte? E.G Iron or calcium in the water? From my experience a batt does not turn brown. Get a battery from a salvage yard. I have not done this extensively so proceed with caution. just a thought.
thats 4.8 liters of gas/minute, good , but not good enough especially if u wanna run a car completely on water. my 1.6L nissan sentra takes around 8.77 liters of gas HHO per minute if ran constantly at 5500 rpm. keep goin you are half way there.
thats 4.8 liters of gas/minute, good , but not good enough especially if u wanna run a car completely on water. my 1.6L nissan sentra takes around 8.77 liters of gas HHO per minute if ran constantly at 5500 rpm. keep goin you are half way there.
@cappydawg It's not burnt, it's split through electrolysis. If you burn hydrogen it bonds with oxygen again and forms back into water. Also, many people try to generate "free energy" by getting more energy out than what they put in, but its simply not possible. Even if the machine were 100% efficient, a combustion engine is usually around 18-20% efficient, converting that other 80-82% into mostly heat. Which is why engines are hot.
@adamslurch71 Each time the energy is converted from one form to another, part of it is converted into a completely different form then what you want. So each time you convert, you lose part of the energy to outside the system (to the air as heat or something else). Thus, you want to reduce the amount of times you convert the energy.
The weak link in the system here is the motor, that's where only 18% is being converted to what you want, the rest is lost through heat.
@obiwan177 Ok so again why cant people see that you have a ton of energy coming out of Internal combustion engines, and yet we never touch them unless we think about making more power. custom setup with a turbo can give you massive power output all from the "Waste that comes out of your tailpipe, and yes it can be done, I have seen it many times.
@adamslurch71 I don't think I quite understand what you are trying to get at. If you have seen it done many times, than you have already answered your question. My answer would be that there are simpler, easier ways to get energy than by harnessing the heat coming off of the engine. A turbocharger or a supercharger would be one of those.
You don't see hydro dams on every tiny little stream, only the big ones because it's the most effective that way.
@adamslurch71 Theoritically you could use that heat to generate steam to create more mechanical energy or something like that, but by the time that energy is changed back into mechanical energy again you don't gain terribly much, and it becomes an extraneous process.
@obiwan177 70% of a cars waste energy is heat through the exhaust. Some steam or Stirling cycle engines exceed 30% efficiency. So you could increase your cars efficiency (mpg?) by another 25%. If you have the room, time, money and inclination.
@powerrabbit2339 It requires 854 kJ of energy to split 1 mol of water into 2 moles of hydrogen atoms, and 1 mol of oxygen atoms. 1 mol of any gas at standard pressure and temperature is 22.4 litres (around). 1.6 / 22.4 = 0.0714 moles of gas, meaning you have 0.1428 moles of hydrogen. Converting kJ into watt-hours, if you were at 100% efficiency to produce exactly 1 mole of gas you would need to be using 42660 watts.
@powerrabbit2339 Using 2200 watts, at 100% efficiency you should have produced 0.1939 moles of gas. You produced 0.0714. Figuring out percentage divide the result by the maximum result, your machine is 37% efficient.
Unless of course there is an error in my math somewhere which there possibly could be. But that's how you figure it out. I'm not quite sure about the 22.4 L part, I could be slightly off there.
my friend i'm doing 7.5 per minute. oystla is right..:) you can do it much better.
keebordcowboy 5 months ago
lOOKS LIKE THE DIFFY DINGLE IS MAX CONFABULATED ALRIGHT
lostbuffalo 10 months ago
4.8 Lpm Hmm... I think it's enough for lighter or tourch, but it's too little for car engine.
Make it 1000 times more powerfull, thus gona do it. Regards.
Kep2078 10 months ago
220 volts , but how many Amperes ? I want to know Power required.
Volt x Amps = Power in watts.
justlivemyway 11 months ago
9 dislikes are people who are called mr boob face LOL!
garrysmod102 1 year ago
this is retarded,the pressure of water already in the bottle is higher than the pressure of water exerted to inside the bottle,basically u wear pouring water form the bottle to the container lol
ShinobiLB400 1 year ago
@ShinobiLB400 Technically not. Because there was no gas to take the place of the water the water couldn't escape the bottle. Try it, fill your sink with water then pull a cup upside out of the water. The water won't drain until the opening clears the surface.
luxsato 1 year ago
good job think positive and keep up the good work. and someday it will all pay off.
you are years in front of most of us.
datzfast 2 years ago
well you aren't making energy....you are just taking energy from electricity to make the hydrogen.....its takes the same amount of energy to split water into hydrogen as you get when you burn the hydrogen....also....try getting 10 amps using the sun
PiL182 2 years ago
electricity in your home cost a lot less then fuel, i guese 1.5 dollar for a litter
while electricity cost 0.2 dollar for 1KVA, do the math...
strikeagle1 2 years ago
Do you even know how much hydrogen it takes to be energy equivalent to a gallon of gasoline? You do the math! And what do you think they are using to make electricity? How about coal, natural gas, and nuclear. When cars run on hydrogen it won't be using a tank full of diatomic hydrogen... that is too dangerous....
PiL182 2 years ago
as i recall, there are cars running on fuel cells which use hydrogen...
no one said you should make hydrogen by waisting energy from your battery or home outlet, you can use solar panels or wind generator and some other things...
strikeagle1 2 years ago
Yes there are experimental cars with hydrogen fuel cells. The storage tanks are too dangerous and it's been said that it could be 20 years before they are safe. This video on HHO is not about fuel cells. The term "HHO" is a fraud. Look it up on Google.
PiL182 2 years ago
no you can't use a solar panel because this video is using 10 amps.... you can't get even close to 10 amps with a solar panel.
PiL182 2 years ago
Yes, i know... they even try to start a car with it :)
it's ment to make electricity with fuel cells, not to act as a fuel, like gasoline... :)
strikeagle1 2 years ago
They labeled this video HHO. That is an unscientific term for a mixture of diatomic hydrogen and diatomic oxygen. You can't use this mixture for fuel cells. It has to be pure hydrogen. They should have separated the anode and cathode so that they collect only hydrogen and then not labeled this video as HHO.
PiL182 2 years ago
So it's Hydrogen and Oxygen together, i thought they where making only Hydrogen, silly me...
You are right, i've just noticed the possitive and the negative are close to one another...
strikeagle1 2 years ago
no problem =]
PiL182 2 years ago
also making gasolin out of oil is a waste of energy.. maybe the loss of energy here is greater... ?? ;)
strikeagle1 2 years ago
yea, your right, he is making a flamible gas from liquid water.
datzfast 2 years ago
lol mr. fusion XD back to the future rules.
nice panel =)
KKinsane2009 2 years ago
1987 V-6 S-10 pickup running dual 250 amp alternator A custom made by Rick Laurence (godsfuel) 260 amp ccpwm set at 175 amps constant, 4 gens 20 SS plates in each in town driving 195 mpg, hwy millage untested.
engine runs cool, Ltm A shit load
NLOLIN4Solar 2 years ago
Have you tried stainless screen wire, it ain't no joke
TheBrittBoy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mega Joules per liter.
Gasoline 34.2
Gaseous Hydrogen at room temperature 0.01079
HHO, two parts H one part O so divide 0.01079 by 3 x 2 = energy density 0.00719 Mega Joules per liter at room temp.
Raise temp to typical HHO cell temp 185 F (60 amps input) gas expands 21.76 percent.
0.00719 divided by 121.76 x 100 energy density now 0.00590 Mega Joules per liter.
34.2 Mega Joules divided by 0.00590, ratio of 5,796.6 to one. One gallon of gasoline = 5,796.6 gallons of HHO.
EnergySupply2008 3 years ago
now ignite it
ggaudin1 3 years ago 10
no where near enough ! need 524 liters per minute to run a small block checvy @ 20 mpg
type in hydrogen 524 and see!
1100tech 3 years ago
well what if it was producing that ammount all day.. and stored in a tank. then all u have to do is adjust the size of the tank. soo that a full tank would give you 200 or more miles.. and while you are driving, your home is generating more in the spare tank.. alowing for you to collect as many tanks as you want.
captcaveman4201 2 years ago 2
you need 400 cu/ft of gas to run the same mileage as 1 gallon of gas 20mpg that would be 20cu/ft per mile so to run 200 mile it would need 4000 cu/ft of storage in comparison a 100 lbs hydrogen tank that is used for welding has 219 cu/ft in it OR about 12 miles of fuel so you would need 20 of those tanks to go 200 miles besides there isn't enough physical volume in a cylinder to hold 3/4 of a liter of gas per power stroke UNLESS it is pressure injected
1100tech 2 years ago
i recomend that you look up hydrogen racecar..and you will see the type of hydrogen tanks required.
captcaveman4201 2 years ago
can u post the details abt the cell pls
rgds paul
paulsonaivy 3 years ago
I think tweaking the flux capacitor another jigowatt would do it.......
gen1f69 3 years ago 16
1.21 GIGAWATTS??!!
Run4runes 3 years ago
I don't care who you are, that there was funny.......
gen1f69 3 years ago
=D Thank You
Run4runes 3 years ago
where we are going ... we dont need roads !!!! lol
captcaveman4201 2 years ago
for that kind of wattage that unit should be outputing around 12LPM, or 4 litres in 20 seconds. you need to re evaluate the electrode config.
d3adp001 3 years ago
I see 70 x 50 thats 3500 3.5 killa watts at that imput i can produce ,well at 70 amps over 7 ltrs per min,and thats at 24 volts not 50
SMARTER0THAN0YOU 3 years ago 2
797W/min per liter is very inefficient. You should look for 200-300W/min per liter of HHO production.
minde4000 3 years ago 2
this is impressive prduction. However, I am assuming here, your meter reads 70+ volts and 50+ amps @ 4.8 liters per minute. Thats 797.5 watts per liter per minute. That is double what others here have produced. You need to be around 300 watts per liter per minute to be usefull.
ecg5757 3 years ago
Why don't most of these guys ever say what amps their using up ! making this much gas is the easiest thing in the world, making it efficiently is another story. So, what's the amps ?
vid009a 3 years ago
Hit the "more info"!!! There U can find it Ur self. But ... Yes! It's still not efficient enough.
Cyonk 3 years ago
Any hydrogen generator caped off and allowed time to build up pressure will do a similar output for a short period of time. run a straight tube from that thing and lets see what you have.
nasanction 3 years ago
this is getting close to the amount needed to power a smaller engine correct, say 1100 cc ?
BillyJackets 3 years ago
Who made this video?
Can't find anything else concerning this test.
TomCjr 3 years ago
How's your production?
cribcat1 3 years ago
don't know, try again if not theres sites that have temporary email addresses. post the temp here and I'll shoot mine back.
cribcat1 3 years ago
I use 304 grade stainless. To make sure its pure, use a magnet, if it sticks or tries to stick, its no good, that means its susceptible to rust. I'm using that grade for an electrolysis unit, so far its been used for an hour and has been in the water for nearly 2-3 weeks, still no rust
chevy668 3 years ago
Can anyone tell me why I get a lot of brown gunk in my water, I use 316 s/s plates and sodium hydroxide electrolyte.
Thank you
dieselT111 3 years ago
stainless if I'm not mistaken has some steel in it. Iron tends to turn red or orange or brown when oxidized. You may notice discoloration from the oxidizing terminal or electrode.
cribcat1 3 years ago
Thanks cribcat1 for your reply, yeah I was wondering if this was the case but this seems to be more than discoloration, it looks more like I've invented a new kind of tea making machine, with the tea leaves still inside!...
dieselT111 3 years ago
I thought it was the water but I did a test with graphite (carpenter pencil leads) and even with the high mineral content in my water there was no brown scum or discoloration.
cribcat1 3 years ago
Graphite hay?, very interesting, Yeah maybe I need to look at a different metal, maybe titanium or something, someone else just told me it was the water and that I needed to use distilled water, wonder if the location might be an issue (water quality), I live in Australia, what about you?
dieselT111 3 years ago
I'm in America and my tap water comes from a well. Does your water smell funny? If not it may be the plates. Copper gives off a greenish scum when used as an electrode if I remember correctly. Another way of testing your metal is to use a strong magnet if you feel an attraction force then there is iron in the metal.
cribcat1 3 years ago
p.s. if You take a lead acid battery and refill it with tap water, charge it, does it turn brown? Everyone I know claims that you must use distilled. Does the sulfuric acid react with the battery electrolyte? E.G Iron or calcium in the water? From my experience a batt does not turn brown. Get a battery from a salvage yard. I have not done this extensively so proceed with caution. just a thought.
cribcat1 3 years ago
Hi cribcat1. Posted a message yesterday but for some reason it didn't come out, would you be interested in talking via email. thanks for your help.
dieselT111 3 years ago
yes
cribcat1 3 years ago
I have tried to send the email but I think for security reasons it won't work, what now?
dieselT111 3 years ago
thats 4.8 liters of gas/minute, good , but not good enough especially if u wanna run a car completely on water. my 1.6L nissan sentra takes around 8.77 liters of gas HHO per minute if ran constantly at 5500 rpm. keep goin you are half way there.
kurdishmob 3 years ago
thats 4.8 liters of gas/minute, good , but not good enough especially if u wanna run a car completely on water. my 1.6L nissan sentra takes around 8.77 liters of gas HHO per minute if ran constantly at 5500 rpm. keep goin you are half way there.
kurdishmob 3 years ago
how do you get to play with so many volts couldn't that spark wow this is awsome cool video
stronglungs 3 years ago
AWESOME I need to speak to you further please send me a private message so we can talk about commercial release. Funding, adaption to other items.
Coog
Coogrrr 4 years ago
Good work that is outstanding keep posting.
crazzieg 4 years ago
Approximately 28% efficiency. You can do better
oystla 4 years ago
How did you calculate it?
powerrabbit2339 4 years ago
EFFICIENCY (%)= 7744,2844 *V*100 / UIt
i.e. output energy/inpput en.
V= Volume HHO gas produced during t
t= time of test in seconds
U= Voltage
I=amperage
oystla 4 years ago
@powerrabbit2339 the amount of energy Hydrogen releases when burnt vs the amount of energy used by your 220v cell to generate it. am i right?
cappydawg 1 year ago
@cappydawg It's not burnt, it's split through electrolysis. If you burn hydrogen it bonds with oxygen again and forms back into water. Also, many people try to generate "free energy" by getting more energy out than what they put in, but its simply not possible. Even if the machine were 100% efficient, a combustion engine is usually around 18-20% efficient, converting that other 80-82% into mostly heat. Which is why engines are hot.
obiwan177 1 year ago
@obiwan177 So why not use that heat to create energy? theres a ton of it yet its going to waste.
adamslurch71 1 year ago
@adamslurch71 Each time the energy is converted from one form to another, part of it is converted into a completely different form then what you want. So each time you convert, you lose part of the energy to outside the system (to the air as heat or something else). Thus, you want to reduce the amount of times you convert the energy.
The weak link in the system here is the motor, that's where only 18% is being converted to what you want, the rest is lost through heat.
obiwan177 1 year ago
@obiwan177 Ok so again why cant people see that you have a ton of energy coming out of Internal combustion engines, and yet we never touch them unless we think about making more power. custom setup with a turbo can give you massive power output all from the "Waste that comes out of your tailpipe, and yes it can be done, I have seen it many times.
adamslurch71 1 year ago
@adamslurch71 I don't think I quite understand what you are trying to get at. If you have seen it done many times, than you have already answered your question. My answer would be that there are simpler, easier ways to get energy than by harnessing the heat coming off of the engine. A turbocharger or a supercharger would be one of those.
You don't see hydro dams on every tiny little stream, only the big ones because it's the most effective that way.
obiwan177 1 year ago
@adamslurch71 Theoritically you could use that heat to generate steam to create more mechanical energy or something like that, but by the time that energy is changed back into mechanical energy again you don't gain terribly much, and it becomes an extraneous process.
obiwan177 1 year ago
@obiwan177 70% of a cars waste energy is heat through the exhaust. Some steam or Stirling cycle engines exceed 30% efficiency. So you could increase your cars efficiency (mpg?) by another 25%. If you have the room, time, money and inclination.
m1aws 4 months ago in playlist More videos from powerrabbit2339
@powerrabbit2339 It requires 854 kJ of energy to split 1 mol of water into 2 moles of hydrogen atoms, and 1 mol of oxygen atoms. 1 mol of any gas at standard pressure and temperature is 22.4 litres (around). 1.6 / 22.4 = 0.0714 moles of gas, meaning you have 0.1428 moles of hydrogen. Converting kJ into watt-hours, if you were at 100% efficiency to produce exactly 1 mole of gas you would need to be using 42660 watts.
obiwan177 1 year ago
@powerrabbit2339 Using 2200 watts, at 100% efficiency you should have produced 0.1939 moles of gas. You produced 0.0714. Figuring out percentage divide the result by the maximum result, your machine is 37% efficient.
Unless of course there is an error in my math somewhere which there possibly could be. But that's how you figure it out. I'm not quite sure about the 22.4 L part, I could be slightly off there.
obiwan177 1 year ago
nice work!
pi3573 4 years ago
Wow!
Thanks
Jack
dulcajack 4 years ago