I'm inclined to vote for them & want to see them do well not because I agree with all their policies but because I want proprtional representation - then a vote for someone who more represents me wont be wasted. As things r, I find all 3 fairly similar regards crime,immigration,welfare spending and the EU. . .
As to some comments here; in all honesty,it's 13 years of Labour that have made me realise how the Nazi's managed to run 1930's Germany!!! I mean;we now live in a country where you do get hassled,even arrested for taking a photo of train stations or a museum for Christ's sakes!!!Hell; if Labour said the Jews r genetically different, most of it's core supporters would agree!!!
Also, I've lived in a number of countries including communist Russia and some one party states and the fact is, Labours England is the most regulated and spied on of the lot!!! They're all terrified at work of petty mistakes as they all carry hefty fines,not much better on the street!! u can barely sneeze now without someone being able to fine u for it, it's ridiculous!!!
The Liberal Democrats, like Labour, don't seem to understand the reason for the huge rise in crime in the last 60 years: the rise and prominence of the welfare state. 'Initiatives' such as gates on communities are not a long-term solution.
Ah our good friends the liberals. They answer to everything is making a new law for it only for it to outlaw honest, normal people and not affect the criminals.
The Liberal Democrats would actually be the best bet to get us out of a recession and make sure tax is fairly distributed for one or two reasons alone. Nick Clegg needs to float away from the other two main parties and have clear policies which will win votes. Now Vince Cable, a man I admire has proposed an income tax cut instead of this pathetic VAT cut which most retailers are not taking that 2.5% off. Anyway Lib's also believe in fairer taxation and Im middle class living through Labour's EMA
why the hell do we lib dems them they should be called the robin hood of the modern world, steal from the rich give to the poor. ok a socialist gov may have been needed around the early 20th century but we dont need one now. they talk about helping lower income people but labour do that anyway if anything they give them far too much. our country doesnt need a left wing goverment it need right wing nationalism
After reading some of the comments on this video, I can only say that the only liberal political party in the WORLD with a chance of forming government (Because everyone else is either conservative or socialist) and they get told they're fascists!
haha. Oh well. To be honest, I've always thought the Lib Dems are pretty close to the conservatives, especially with Nick Clegg's new economic policies.
I must protest. "Liberal Democrats" and "Cutting Crime" do not go together.
Such a party would turn HM's fine prisons into wards staffed by "Psychologists", with the aim of discovering and fixing the wrongs of society: clearly the reason for the behaviour of the individual.
Of course, any sensible party would bring forth legislation whereby the criminal spends the rest of his squandered life on the treadmill or, failing that, is questioned as to what his height, weight and build is...
This is in England and I'm not going to judge them by this. But it is most certain that liberal democrats in America make excuses for crime and are terribly soft on all offenders from child predators to murders.
2 big differences: libs are pro-individual freedom; nazis believe the masses should be subservient to a ruling elite.
libs believe in rationalism, progress, human goodness and democracy; fascists believe in political myth, warfare, human weakness and dictatorship.
MOST ideologies (including the nazis) share SOME factors e.g. community. This is unavoidable, & it's the differences u must look at. for more info, read 'Political Ideologies' by Heywood. Trust me, i'm a politics student.
well, not especially. i do like him as a politician, but some of the policies they've dropped do annoy me. i was just fairly horrified that anyone could be so politically ignorant as to suggest they are a) like nazis, or b) undemocratic. and your comment was just a bit...unjustified? without the power of the civil service and government cash, of course there's a certain impotency now. but if we have a hung parliament after the next election? a coalition isn't the most unlikely option.
I think you'll find it was bmda106 who compared the Lib Dems with the Nazis. I was merely stating my opinion that the Libs couldn't run a bath. An opinion that was seemingly reflected throughout the UK as they got right royally shafted by the electorate on Thursday. Maybe now they'll stop referring to themselves as the "Shadow Cabinet" and show a little humility.
im well aware it was bmda106, i was just explaining my slew of comments...and the may 1st results were definitely a tory victory, but lib dems improved from last year, statistically by a great amount, and now appear to stand a chance of entering coalition, having forced labour into third place in terms of percentage of the vote. besides, its not a party's job to show humility. its to scrutinize government, so calling themselves the shadow cabinet is obv a good idea...
and the concept that they cannot run a bath is just as unquantified and unjustified as saying they cannot cut cake. it just sounds like prejudice from where i'm standing, because you're just throwing around insults without reasons.
Insults or not, I stand by what I say, and my opinions are based on first-hand experience of Liberal Democrat Ccouncillors and the spin & deception they employ. Calling themselves the Shadow Cabinet is not a good idea, it's dishonest. This title is reserve for the official opposition. I could start calling myself Brad Pitt, but it wouldn't mean that I became him. As for Libs scrutinising the government, don't make me laugh. Apart from their opposition to the Iraq war they're just NewLabour-lite!
you wish... the lib dems are far more pro-reform than the labour party, and they want proportional representation as a priority. they have set targets on green issues, unlike our government who do nothing but endless consultation, and the tories (who ill be so bold as to guess you support), who will put a chauffeur driven car behind their cycling leader. THAT is deception for you.
What are you saying, that he should have cycled through London with all his important documents strapped to the handlebars? Come on Rach, is that the best you can come up with? You can't attack him on policy so you mention that old chestnut about his chauffeur driving behind him. The fact is that Cameron's got you lot well & truly rattled, that's why you fired the old guy and replaced him with "Cameron wanabee" Nick Clegg. And yes, Tory and proud!! Have been for 15 years.
meh, i just find the bicycle example amusing, im not for an instant suggesting its cameron's most serious problem...(grin) it just shows though that tories arent THAT into green issues, i think...
and i was never a ming supporter. its a shame, but he just wasn't leadership material. i also believe nick clegg has been misunderstood on a range of isues he talked about (though i was more of a huhne supporter, but thats neither here nor there).
tory policy: wealth for the wealthy, dirt for the poor.
Dirt for the poor!! What are you talking about Rach? In my experience, Lib Dem policy amounts to: "We're than the other two parties, vote for us, please!!" And I'm working class/middle-class, whatever you want to call it. I went to a state comprehensive and spent the last twenty years of my working life in the manual sector. This debate between us is turning into a slanging match, which I'm happy to carry on if you want. Cameron may dislike Punch & Judy politics, but I don't mind it at all.
bmda106- I think if he didn't want Nick Griffin to speak he would have said so. The change I refer to is the change from fifty years of Labour- Tory let-downs, in order to re-establish tradition. I have said what I feel I need to say. If I won't convince you the Lib Dems aren't what you think they are, im not going to try.
elywnn said - "in 2005, there were more than 645,000 victims of cross-racial violent crimes between blacks and whites in the U.S. In 90 percent of those crimes, black offenders attacked white victims."
Wow, what a co-incidence...didn't she know that 90% of statistics are made up on the spot?
The current legal system in Britain is notoriously lenient on serious crime ie- rape, arson, violent assault and hard on minor offences. Proportionality is in a mess. There must be a system whereby offenders will think twice before terrorising society.
The Liberal Democrats were once viewed as caring more about criminals than about their victims. I am a liberal and I believe staunchly that those who hurt society must pay it back. I am pleased the party appears to have changed this unhelpful image.
not aimed at you personally, but liberals have only changed because it gets them votes. both you and labour use hitlers brainwashing techniques to convince society that you are the only good, and everyone else is wrong. why dnt u just step out of the circle and look at the party you serve, then compare them to the nazis... you will find that they are scarily similar
bmda106- im not a councillor or an MP so im not that subservient to the party. I don't know what you are referring to about brainwashing and to bring Hitler into it! The Lib Dems have given credit to the other parties when they do agree. I certainly don't think the LD are perfect and the other parties are terrible. And parties change all the time-usually in reference to what concerns people. Why do you think that is bad? I can always quote the Tories if you want change.
when we went to war with iraq. i was totally opposed before combat started. when i watched the prime ministers speach somehow he managed to completely change my mind. this is down to a media form of brainwashing that was origiannly perfectionised by hitler. this is something that labour, and probably lib dem are very good at. fortunatly the tories suck at it, like everything else. but i do believe.. if the lib dems ever do get it, it will be the end of britian, ur far to tolerant of everything
bmda- No, that is down to you being very naive. I opposed the war from the very start. I watch the media regularly and I watched the PM as well. Why wasn't I brainwashed?
As for the Lib Dems being far too tolerant, I would agree. On some issues they are.
well perhaps at the time i was naive, i was very yound and new to politics. but ur party represent to me a blindness to the past, and ur reforms just strengthen this belief. most ppl in britian today believe britian to last forever, and that we are immune from change. history teaches other lessons, that the over tolerant always fall. this is why the lib dems will be the end of britian. i challange you to read early british or roman history and tell me im wrong
bmda106- All parties change occasionally in line with developments and what concerns people. If a policy isn't working, it makes sense to change it. Its called politics. And I don't know what brainwashing you are referring to. The LD have given the other parties credit when they agree. I don't think everything about the our opposition is bad and I certainly don't think we are perfect. And just what has Hitler or the nazis got to do with the Lib Dems? Come of it!
ok, ill come out and say it.. but ur not going to like it. the liberals claim that they they are the opposite to the nazis.. but when u really look hard at it, you are virtually the same in every way that counts. your popular with young votes. differnt ideas to traditional values. nd many of ur policies are identical. and whenever someone, eg the bnp have a peaceful march its always broken up by liberal thugs. cnt u see the similarities?? so many of ur supporters are such hypocrits
Are you a BNP activist? If you are, you can hardly lecture anyone else on fascism. And it may interest you to know that the local Lib Dem MP in Oxford stuck up for the right of Nick Griffin to speak- even though he strongly disagreed. And as the Liberals are the oldest establishment in British politics, they are hardly anti-tradition.
im not any type of activist. im a student, and the local lib dem mp in oxford only defended nick griffin because it would be hypocracy infront of the media to bann free speech to a lecture on free speech. you openly say the lib dems are changing, so how can you then say you represent the oldest establishment in politics if you are not the same as you always were?
In 2005, there were more than 645,000 victims of cross-racial violent crimes between blacks and whites in the U.S. In 90 percent of those crimes, black offenders attacked white victims.
But why would an American Congressman want to become president of a British political party? Has he given up on his hopes of winning in the US? Woof woof.
Libdems r liars vote snp for a better scotland
MrScottishJamie 11 months ago
I'm inclined to vote for them & want to see them do well not because I agree with all their policies but because I want proprtional representation - then a vote for someone who more represents me wont be wasted. As things r, I find all 3 fairly similar regards crime,immigration,welfare spending and the EU. . .
68cyberzen 1 year ago
As to some comments here; in all honesty,it's 13 years of Labour that have made me realise how the Nazi's managed to run 1930's Germany!!! I mean;we now live in a country where you do get hassled,even arrested for taking a photo of train stations or a museum for Christ's sakes!!!Hell; if Labour said the Jews r genetically different, most of it's core supporters would agree!!!
68cyberzen 1 year ago
Also, I've lived in a number of countries including communist Russia and some one party states and the fact is, Labours England is the most regulated and spied on of the lot!!! They're all terrified at work of petty mistakes as they all carry hefty fines,not much better on the street!! u can barely sneeze now without someone being able to fine u for it, it's ridiculous!!!
68cyberzen 1 year ago
They want to go green and put everyone on the dole ha ha still if it earns us all 10k im up for it.
royandrew 1 year ago
more immigrants and no nukes great ideas.
mikey83x 1 year ago
The Liberal Democrats, like Labour, don't seem to understand the reason for the huge rise in crime in the last 60 years: the rise and prominence of the welfare state. 'Initiatives' such as gates on communities are not a long-term solution.
SpunkOnSchoolUniform 2 years ago
I like the Lib Dems
renaultlover1 3 years ago
Ah our good friends the liberals. They answer to everything is making a new law for it only for it to outlaw honest, normal people and not affect the criminals.
DaviDeXtA 3 years ago
The Liberal Democrats would actually be the best bet to get us out of a recession and make sure tax is fairly distributed for one or two reasons alone. Nick Clegg needs to float away from the other two main parties and have clear policies which will win votes. Now Vince Cable, a man I admire has proposed an income tax cut instead of this pathetic VAT cut which most retailers are not taking that 2.5% off. Anyway Lib's also believe in fairer taxation and Im middle class living through Labour's EMA
andipandy123 3 years ago
I support the Lib Dems, but i think they should be aware that too many bars and locked gates can leave people feeling like sheep in pens.
nirvanafreak95 3 years ago 5
Actually, people asked for them, thats why they put them up and they do work to cut crime, they are FAR more effective than CCTV.
Erech01 2 years ago
why the hell do we lib dems them they should be called the robin hood of the modern world, steal from the rich give to the poor. ok a socialist gov may have been needed around the early 20th century but we dont need one now. they talk about helping lower income people but labour do that anyway if anything they give them far too much. our country doesnt need a left wing goverment it need right wing nationalism
o01R0NM4N0o 3 years ago
this is brainwashing if they were not sheep and were free and had guns and knives this would matter
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because
of gun control: 56 million.
Walkingtall123789 3 years ago
After reading some of the comments on this video, I can only say that the only liberal political party in the WORLD with a chance of forming government (Because everyone else is either conservative or socialist) and they get told they're fascists!
haha. Oh well. To be honest, I've always thought the Lib Dems are pretty close to the conservatives, especially with Nick Clegg's new economic policies.
wkcia 3 years ago
"Liberals" making 3,500 new laws? Sounds like an oxymoron to me!
Quote: Those who would sacrifice Liberty for Security, deserve neither.
-Benjamin Franklin
ss0rca 3 years ago
I must protest. "Liberal Democrats" and "Cutting Crime" do not go together.
Such a party would turn HM's fine prisons into wards staffed by "Psychologists", with the aim of discovering and fixing the wrongs of society: clearly the reason for the behaviour of the individual.
Of course, any sensible party would bring forth legislation whereby the criminal spends the rest of his squandered life on the treadmill or, failing that, is questioned as to what his height, weight and build is...
MrsWhitehouseOnline 3 years ago
This is in England and I'm not going to judge them by this. But it is most certain that liberal democrats in America make excuses for crime and are terribly soft on all offenders from child predators to murders.
ronpaul2020 3 years ago
Yeah in some states the death penalty isn't even an option. Atrocious - it's like a crime against humanity. It's all the liberals fault.
Watermark0n 3 years ago
bmda:
2 big differences: libs are pro-individual freedom; nazis believe the masses should be subservient to a ruling elite.
libs believe in rationalism, progress, human goodness and democracy; fascists believe in political myth, warfare, human weakness and dictatorship.
MOST ideologies (including the nazis) share SOME factors e.g. community. This is unavoidable, & it's the differences u must look at. for more info, read 'Political Ideologies' by Heywood. Trust me, i'm a politics student.
rachthegreat2 3 years ago
Lib Dems cutting crime? This lot couldn't cut a slice of cake!!
YorkshireDaz 3 years ago
funny. all the lib dems i ever met cut MY cake just fine.
rachthegreat2 3 years ago
I take it you are one of Nick Clegg's conquests?
YorkshireDaz 3 years ago
well, not especially. i do like him as a politician, but some of the policies they've dropped do annoy me. i was just fairly horrified that anyone could be so politically ignorant as to suggest they are a) like nazis, or b) undemocratic. and your comment was just a bit...unjustified? without the power of the civil service and government cash, of course there's a certain impotency now. but if we have a hung parliament after the next election? a coalition isn't the most unlikely option.
rachthegreat2 3 years ago
I think you'll find it was bmda106 who compared the Lib Dems with the Nazis. I was merely stating my opinion that the Libs couldn't run a bath. An opinion that was seemingly reflected throughout the UK as they got right royally shafted by the electorate on Thursday. Maybe now they'll stop referring to themselves as the "Shadow Cabinet" and show a little humility.
YorkshireDaz 3 years ago
im well aware it was bmda106, i was just explaining my slew of comments...and the may 1st results were definitely a tory victory, but lib dems improved from last year, statistically by a great amount, and now appear to stand a chance of entering coalition, having forced labour into third place in terms of percentage of the vote. besides, its not a party's job to show humility. its to scrutinize government, so calling themselves the shadow cabinet is obv a good idea...
rachthegreat2 3 years ago
and the concept that they cannot run a bath is just as unquantified and unjustified as saying they cannot cut cake. it just sounds like prejudice from where i'm standing, because you're just throwing around insults without reasons.
rachthegreat2 3 years ago
Insults or not, I stand by what I say, and my opinions are based on first-hand experience of Liberal Democrat Ccouncillors and the spin & deception they employ. Calling themselves the Shadow Cabinet is not a good idea, it's dishonest. This title is reserve for the official opposition. I could start calling myself Brad Pitt, but it wouldn't mean that I became him. As for Libs scrutinising the government, don't make me laugh. Apart from their opposition to the Iraq war they're just NewLabour-lite!
YorkshireDaz 3 years ago
you wish... the lib dems are far more pro-reform than the labour party, and they want proportional representation as a priority. they have set targets on green issues, unlike our government who do nothing but endless consultation, and the tories (who ill be so bold as to guess you support), who will put a chauffeur driven car behind their cycling leader. THAT is deception for you.
rachthegreat2 3 years ago
What are you saying, that he should have cycled through London with all his important documents strapped to the handlebars? Come on Rach, is that the best you can come up with? You can't attack him on policy so you mention that old chestnut about his chauffeur driving behind him. The fact is that Cameron's got you lot well & truly rattled, that's why you fired the old guy and replaced him with "Cameron wanabee" Nick Clegg. And yes, Tory and proud!! Have been for 15 years.
YorkshireDaz 3 years ago
meh, i just find the bicycle example amusing, im not for an instant suggesting its cameron's most serious problem...(grin) it just shows though that tories arent THAT into green issues, i think...
and i was never a ming supporter. its a shame, but he just wasn't leadership material. i also believe nick clegg has been misunderstood on a range of isues he talked about (though i was more of a huhne supporter, but thats neither here nor there).
tory policy: wealth for the wealthy, dirt for the poor.
rachthegreat2 3 years ago
Dirt for the poor!! What are you talking about Rach? In my experience, Lib Dem policy amounts to: "We're than the other two parties, vote for us, please!!" And I'm working class/middle-class, whatever you want to call it. I went to a state comprehensive and spent the last twenty years of my working life in the manual sector. This debate between us is turning into a slanging match, which I'm happy to carry on if you want. Cameron may dislike Punch & Judy politics, but I don't mind it at all.
YorkshireDaz 3 years ago
12 mins in some good stuff said.
ManlySlut 3 years ago
this party cant call them selfs Liberal or Democrats because they absoloty arnt demicratic atall
samdung91 3 years ago
of course they're democratic samdung...why would you say they aren't? is this a specific issue you're referring to?
rachthegreat2 3 years ago
bmda106- I think if he didn't want Nick Griffin to speak he would have said so. The change I refer to is the change from fifty years of Labour- Tory let-downs, in order to re-establish tradition. I have said what I feel I need to say. If I won't convince you the Lib Dems aren't what you think they are, im not going to try.
CULAVE 3 years ago
elywnn said - "in 2005, there were more than 645,000 victims of cross-racial violent crimes between blacks and whites in the U.S. In 90 percent of those crimes, black offenders attacked white victims."
Wow, what a co-incidence...didn't she know that 90% of statistics are made up on the spot?
kingkingkingqueen 4 years ago
leanient on rape? 25 year sentance - 15 yr minimum.....I'm interested to know what your idea of tough is if you think that's lenient!!!
kingkingkingqueen 4 years ago
I'd like to see you spend 25 years in prison and tell me its lenient.
hifimonkeykong 4 years ago 4
id like you to get raped so you can tell me sentances eas your suffering
bmda106 3 years ago
The current legal system in Britain is notoriously lenient on serious crime ie- rape, arson, violent assault and hard on minor offences. Proportionality is in a mess. There must be a system whereby offenders will think twice before terrorising society.
CULAVE 4 years ago
Whoever gave me the minus points why don't you explain why? Its bloody childish!
CULAVE 3 years ago
No, Britain has liberals.
MBDWilkes 4 years ago
The Liberal Democrats were once viewed as caring more about criminals than about their victims. I am a liberal and I believe staunchly that those who hurt society must pay it back. I am pleased the party appears to have changed this unhelpful image.
CULAVE 4 years ago
not aimed at you personally, but liberals have only changed because it gets them votes. both you and labour use hitlers brainwashing techniques to convince society that you are the only good, and everyone else is wrong. why dnt u just step out of the circle and look at the party you serve, then compare them to the nazis... you will find that they are scarily similar
bmda106 3 years ago
bmda106- im not a councillor or an MP so im not that subservient to the party. I don't know what you are referring to about brainwashing and to bring Hitler into it! The Lib Dems have given credit to the other parties when they do agree. I certainly don't think the LD are perfect and the other parties are terrible. And parties change all the time-usually in reference to what concerns people. Why do you think that is bad? I can always quote the Tories if you want change.
CULAVE 3 years ago
when we went to war with iraq. i was totally opposed before combat started. when i watched the prime ministers speach somehow he managed to completely change my mind. this is down to a media form of brainwashing that was origiannly perfectionised by hitler. this is something that labour, and probably lib dem are very good at. fortunatly the tories suck at it, like everything else. but i do believe.. if the lib dems ever do get it, it will be the end of britian, ur far to tolerant of everything
bmda106 3 years ago
bmda- No, that is down to you being very naive. I opposed the war from the very start. I watch the media regularly and I watched the PM as well. Why wasn't I brainwashed?
As for the Lib Dems being far too tolerant, I would agree. On some issues they are.
CULAVE 3 years ago
well perhaps at the time i was naive, i was very yound and new to politics. but ur party represent to me a blindness to the past, and ur reforms just strengthen this belief. most ppl in britian today believe britian to last forever, and that we are immune from change. history teaches other lessons, that the over tolerant always fall. this is why the lib dems will be the end of britian. i challange you to read early british or roman history and tell me im wrong
bmda106 3 years ago
bmda106- All parties change occasionally in line with developments and what concerns people. If a policy isn't working, it makes sense to change it. Its called politics. And I don't know what brainwashing you are referring to. The LD have given the other parties credit when they agree. I don't think everything about the our opposition is bad and I certainly don't think we are perfect. And just what has Hitler or the nazis got to do with the Lib Dems? Come of it!
CULAVE 3 years ago
ok, ill come out and say it.. but ur not going to like it. the liberals claim that they they are the opposite to the nazis.. but when u really look hard at it, you are virtually the same in every way that counts. your popular with young votes. differnt ideas to traditional values. nd many of ur policies are identical. and whenever someone, eg the bnp have a peaceful march its always broken up by liberal thugs. cnt u see the similarities?? so many of ur supporters are such hypocrits
bmda106 3 years ago
Are you a BNP activist? If you are, you can hardly lecture anyone else on fascism. And it may interest you to know that the local Lib Dem MP in Oxford stuck up for the right of Nick Griffin to speak- even though he strongly disagreed. And as the Liberals are the oldest establishment in British politics, they are hardly anti-tradition.
CULAVE 3 years ago
im not any type of activist. im a student, and the local lib dem mp in oxford only defended nick griffin because it would be hypocracy infront of the media to bann free speech to a lecture on free speech. you openly say the lib dems are changing, so how can you then say you represent the oldest establishment in politics if you are not the same as you always were?
bmda106 3 years ago
Liberal Demercrats wont ever get in, and Labour is corrupt. Conservatives are the future
Cricketboy1200 4 years ago
they made liverpool even more ugly with those stupid gates, well done!
kingkingkingqueen 4 years ago
Wouldn't you rather have an ugly gate than have to deal with yobs?
CULAVE 4 years ago
liberals begat crime.
IllustriousSeven 4 years ago
a little bias a pre-meditated ay. the present is the truth and the rest is uncertain
shroomery11 4 years ago
Labour Party
emyro134679 4 years ago
Go on give us a verb Emyro (if you don't mind me being so informal).
pinkdogster 4 years ago
haha! I didn't realise that I posted a comment! I thought the comments box was the search box so I typed in labour party in the wrong place! oops!
Plenty of verbs for you there pinkdogster?! Bloddy liberal
Plaid Cymru am byth :)
Ha ha ha
emyro134679 4 years ago
In 2005, there were more than 645,000 victims of cross-racial violent crimes between blacks and whites in the U.S. In 90 percent of those crimes, black offenders attacked white victims.
ellwyn 4 years ago
You should have some Creedance YO!
meethi24 4 years ago
Ron Paul for President!
rdlastre 4 years ago
But why would an American Congressman want to become president of a British political party? Has he given up on his hopes of winning in the US? Woof woof.
pinkdogster 4 years ago
of course liberals cut crime, I mean look at detroit
steinatj 4 years ago
British politics is different to US politics.
Hellothur 4 years ago
so british liberals ar like our conservatives?
steinatj 4 years ago
steinatj- the only similarity would be the focus on economic liberalism. Other than that though, there are a lot of differences.
CULAVE 3 years ago
This is a good speaker - credible and plain spoken. Video too long for the purposes of youtube. Great content.
hannahmelia 4 years ago
Excellent. Full of interest.
redelzie 4 years ago