Cancer Facts : Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment

[159tony]

there is also a drug that stops blood vessel growth. how is this important? cancer makes new blood vessels to feed itself and to grow and to eat this drug it basically stops the cancer from growing any bigger and from harming you any further. and gives you more time and options to think about during to process. but on the down side it only works for a one kind of cancer and has not yet been tested to such as lung or brain cancer.

[itachiitachi1946]

(2) sincecells tend to 'forget'and in proces loose some crucial infos,the result is not the same as before.that leads to new cells that dontwork well.aka beeing aged.that the definition of age.addthe fact also about lipofuskine which is a hormone crucial for our lives yet it kills us at the same time cause its the 2nd reason of the age process.so...in that conference..they proved and im saying it again..they PROVED that theoritical its posibly to replace lipofuscin and cells with nano tech cells

[itachiitachi1946]

im too sad...im too sad casue when nanotechology will have advanced and humans will be able to creare any cell we want ill be dead cause i wont live until then.im a medic.and i was in a conference about nanotechonology and i was rly amazed about the endless posibilities in medicine.creating mechanical nanocells and injecting them in humans..damn..u know what that means? k ill say this.the human body make new cells evryday,BUT it create new CORE cells evry decade.since cells tend to forget..

[daleyboy50]

Raising your pH to 8 (High PH) kills all cancer cells dead in weeks. Look it up folks. It's that simple. Can be done with Cesium chloride or sodium bicarbonate and diet.

[sweetclaire06]

@daleyboy50 And you call me a troll! You are a troll and a spammer. Cut and paste the same lame comment on every site having to do with medicine.....much? Jerk!

[daleyboy50]

@sweetclaire06 Exactly my point. People who use abusive language to try to get a negative reaction are called 'trolls'. You are a textbook 'troll' and you should know better being a sweet old lady. I think people need to know about cesium / sodium bic and having an abusive tone is not needed.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@daleyboy50 Some people are weak sucks and take things the wrong way. It takes guts to know the truth.

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "Some people are weak sucks and take things the wrong way. It takes guts to know the truth"

That is quite a statement coming from a coward like you. NephilimFree, Kent Hovind, Ken Ham, all have the same beliefs as you, but at least they have the courage to admit their beliefs are from the bible and that they are Christians. You are such a gutless coward as to deny it, even when YOU wrote "We are honest Christians who believe in God and believe in what is taught".

Weak suck indeed.

[sweetclaire06]

@daleyboy50 And how exactly am I using 'abusive' language? I'm stating a fact.I've just happened to go to a number of videos daleyboy50 and seen the exact same post by you. Even though your post has nothing to do with what the video is about.That's spamming.You have an agenda.By the looks of your inactive OR sock acct. it's to just paste the very same claim that YOU have the cure for everyone's cancer in weeks no less! Yes you're going to get a strong response for spreading that kind of nonsense

[GoodScienceForYou]

Big problem with this idea is that if the cancer cell is hungry for food so are normal healthy cells. The healthy human immune system CAN tell the difference and only attacks cancer cells. This "trojan" idea cannot work and lacks forethought.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@rajusman We already have the best cure for cancer. But it is not profitable as the rest. People on the verge of dying will spend a lot of money. But they don't need to. Allowing natural immune cells to work is the best. Restoring or supplimenting the person with cancer's body with DNA matched cells to produce normal immune agents that kill cancer is the best and has NO side effects. It does not attact normal cells. Do you understand?

/watch?v=YJSrxzatNzY

[rajusman]

@GoodScienceForYou I rest my case. You also resort to personal attacks. Maybe you are uneducated. Then again this is youtube, most of america is uneducated, that is what my professor said at Purdue.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@rajusman You are the child, and cannot get above your professor. I am the teachers' teacher. It is what I am called. I never believe anyone without absolute evidence. The absolute evidence we have on humans is that theyre stupid, self destructive, ignorant as to the causes of ANYTHING, and on a path of self destruction. They deny their part of their own self destruction.

These evalutations of humanity are based on objective science. Your choice is to learn from me or remain ignorant.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@rajusman Your first lesson; Never believe anyone on anything without absolute physical evidence. Humans are full of irrational, emotionally controlled agendas and academia is the primary method of brainwashing people into a socially controlled "lemming" life style of conforming to the lowest common denominator of human stupidity.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA DNA ONLY shows genetic degradation from a condition of better fitness and better able to adapt, to less fit and less able to adapt as the environment, weather, foods and etc. become smaller and smaller until extinction. This is fact and why we have so many extinctions. We come from genetic design that was set free on this planet. We were told how to preserve genetic structures by the designer, but, because of compulsions and ignorance, humans are self destructive.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA Your religion has worked out well. It has turned you into a hateful bitter disgusting stalker on Youtube.

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou So you are still too much of a coward to answer my simple question. No surprise there.  Then you use your sock puppets to flat my comments and add thumbs up to your comments since you do not like being shown to be an abject coward.

However, even though I already know that you lack the courage and the integrity to answer my question, I will ask it again. Do you believe the designer is Jehovah? A simple yes or no will do.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA The designer is a supreme being having intelligence beyond any possible understanding of humans. That is clear. The more we know the more we realize how stupid humanity is.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@GoodScienceForYou People want so bad to think that humans are "improving", but in reality we are degrading even more. We just have fancier tools with which to kill each other with. We still have ideologies that are not based on truth, and so we kill. Mothers are instructing thier children to strap on bombs. I don't think that is a sign of genetic improvement. People are still forcing ideologies on one another, and it is far more stupid than ever. Humans are getting more base and stupid.

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou You sent me a PM quoting John Sanford - it figures that you would quote Sanford, a Young Earth Creationist. You also pulled the article from "Creation-Evolution Headlines", a publication of the Bible-Science Association, so much for the "peer-reviewed" publications that you claim to read.

You still want to claim that you are not a YEC? NOBODY BELIEVES YOU!!

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA Actually, there are many hundreds of people who are now understading what I teach and "believe" me. I have a following of people who seek the truth in science, instead of archaic religious bullshit, like your religion of Evodelusionism, that life started from nothing, with no creator, and with no purpose and no design. How stupid does a person have to be to not undestand the obvious? You need to examine your emotional reasons for your religious beliefs. Did a priest molest you?

[GoodScienceForYou]

/watch?v=JntCa6FssRQ

/watch?v=spuZtAa80qI

/watch?v=emPINOUlfnE

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "Actually, there are many hundreds of people who are now understading what I teach and 'believe' me". Yes, quite an accomplishment. You've been on YT for nearly 3 years, have created more than 30 videos, and have 199 subscribers, nearly all of whom are fundy Christians who will sub to anyone who criticizes evolution so that they can believe their Genesis fairy tale. I've only made two videos, one of which I took down in less than three months and have 63 subs - your #'s are not impressive

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY I wrote:"You still want to claim that you are not a YEC? NOBODY BELIEVES YOU"

You replied "Actually, there are many hundreds of people who are now understading what I teach and 'believe' me"

Now let's try and make this more clear so that you can understand. NOBODY believes that you are NOT a Young Earth Creationist. There may be Christians subscribing to your channel, but when you claim in YT comments that you have no religion yet spew nothing but YEC propaganda, we KNOW you are a YEC

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "@AlanCFA I AM NOT A Young Earth Creationist. I go with the evidence."

Like hell.

"There is no evidence as to how old the earth or unverse really is."

Yes there is, but you deny it. You deny evidence for evolution. You have claimed that humans could not have been on the earth for more than 10,000 years, that radiocarbon dating is flawed, and other YEC bullshit. You do add your own spin by claiming that humans and gorillas mated to produce chimps - that would embarrass most YECs

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou "@AlanCFA The designer is a supreme being having intelligence beyond any possible understanding of humans. That is clear"

Still not willing to say whether the designer is Jehovah. What a COWARD! At least we have you on record being a creationist.

Maybe you will grow a pair - probably not, but I will try again. Do you believe the designer is Jehovah? A simple yes or no will do.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA I looked up t word "Jehovah". It means "that which causes to become". Interesting that you keep repeating that. If that is the definition of "Jehovah" then it is absolutely appropriate. However, there is "ParaBramah", called "The Absolute". and "ParaShiva" the form of God as consciousness. I just simply equate "God = Truth". Theres no religion higher than the Truth. If you are not seeking the truth, then you are only seeking to perpetuate your or someone else's dumb ass beliefs.

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou "Interesting that you keep repeating that" Uh, Jehovah is the God of the Christian Bible, aka Yahweh.

Don't tell me that "God = truth" when you have said that a Genetic Engineer designed mankind and put us on planet earth. I asked you about that and in comments on this video, you replied "The designer is a supreme being having intelligence beyond any possible understanding of humans. That is clear"

Guess what? Truth is not a Supreme Being, so it cannot be God = Truth.

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou "Your religion has worked out well." The Theory of Evolution is not a religion, but Christianity is. Don't you recall writing: "We are honest Christians who believe in God and believe in what is taught"?

You are a Christian, Jimmy, therefore you lie when you that you have no religion.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA Your problem is an ideological one, not a scientific one. Your religion, wanting so bad for God to not exist is your problem. The data all points to a supreme genetic designer, because DNA ONLY SHOWS GENETIC DEGRADATION IN ALL CREATURES WE HAVE DNA ON AND WE HAVE examples of the prior conditions in the genetics. We have found over 4500 genetic defects in humans, alone, that cause genetic diseases. Wake up from your stupor.

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "Your religion, wanting so bad for God to not exist is your problem" Atheism isn't a religion, it is a lack of belief in gods. You keep going on about "4,500 genetic defects in humans" that is not indicative of the # of defects in every human. From the link you posted "There are more than 6,000 known single-gene disorders, which occur in about 1 out of every 200 births." Did you notice the ratio of 1:200?

Since you like YECs, try reading Todd Wood's blog 2009/09/truth-about-evolution.­html

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou "@AlanCFA If Atheism is not a religion then Evodelusionism is"

There is no such thing as evodelusionism. There is such a thing as the Theory of Evolution and that is a well-accepted scientific theory. You deny the evidence because of your religious beliefs and you are such a coward that you deny having a religion even when YOU wrote "we are honest Christians who believe in God and believe in what is taught"

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "According to you moron Evotards, evolution fixes and makes things better, more advance and increases information." You do not understand anything about the TOE - you have not even done any basic reading, much less 27,000 scientific papers

" Yet in ALL the DNA evidence that has never happened in any way that would improve any species or make any species more fit. " Blatant, deliberate lie. I have posted several citations about beneficial mutations, you lie and pretend they do not occur

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "You have posted only people's opinions. There is only genetic degradation shown, for instance, in humans. " Untrue. I have cited peer-reviewed papers showing beneficial mutations. You absolutely deny the evidence for evolution

"There are over 4500 KNOWN, mapped in DNA gentic defects that cause 'genetic diseases'" Yes, affecting 1 in every 200 births, leaving 199 in 200 with NO genetic defects. Take a look at the fossil record and see if you can find a modern creature in the precambrian

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "Cancer affects 1 in 3 now" that statistic has nothing to do with mutations that are passed along in reproduction. Most cancers are "new" i.e. they are not genetically inherited. Why don't you know this? "A "normal" person has spine defects, arm defects, ..."

There are two problems with that statement:

1) if those problems are not part of the gene structure of the individual, they will not be inherited - Lamarkism is NOT the same as the TOE.

2) this has always been true

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou "Since the 'fall' of mankind into ignornace and denial..."

Ah, you mean the Garden of Eden.

"Mutations can only cause a NET genetic degradation" That is NOT true. You continue to lie. You are not a scientist and your claim to having read 20,000 papers when you did NOT know about the fusion of human chromosome #2 is IRREFUTABLE PROOF that you lie.

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "The fusion of #2 shows that humans and chimps came from a superior human ancestor. Chimps have degraded quickly."

1) If the fusion of #2 is a degradation, then why would chimps degrade more quickly than humans when they do NOT have a fused chromosome?

2) Your video claimed the fusion of #2 NEVER happened watch?v=29e8brRBEVI

3) You claimed that humans had sex with gorillas to produce chimps and that the fusion of #2 prevented continued inbreeding.

4) A common ancestor proves the TOE.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA Chimps have different mutations and genetic degradation than humans. This is obvious to any observer. I just pointed out that the "fusion of number 2 is also a genetic degradation that we have an the chimps don't have. A common superior ancestor is what the DNA points to. And so does all of the other evidence. There is no evolution towards more complex, only towards more defects.  Thus the common ancestor was far more fit, superior human species.

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "IF evolution were true, none of those diseases could exist. Because the "magical Evotard" fairy would cause good mutations and fix all the screwed up genes."

1) the "If evolution were true, then..." statement is how the process of falsification works. Don't you remember that you made a video claiming that falsification was nonsense? watch?v=4g_CoZ5sZaI

2) There is nothing in the TOE that says good mutations will fix bad mutations. Really bad mutations kill and they are not passed on.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA We have absolute evidence that Evolution is not possible. Therefore it is not a scientific term.

If you deny evidence, then you are just living in denial for emotional reasons. You life is based on what you want to believe and not on evidence.

We are full of bad mutations. There are over 4600 genetic defects that shorten lives drastically called genetic diseases. You have genetic defects, all humans do. Why do you deny absolute scientific evidence?

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA You can't falsify a religion, because it has no real evidence as Evolution is based on faith, inferences and projection of belief on evidence and that is all it is.

Now if you have a real science it doesn't need to be falsified only people trying to perpetuate a religious idea need "falsification" go listen to the video again. You must only go in the positive direction towards what the evidence actually shows.

DNA is absolutely contrary to your faith and beliefs.

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou "You can't falsify a religion, because it has no real evidence as Evolution is based on faith, inferences and projection of belief on evidence and that is all it is." The TOE is not a religion. It is falsifiable, only creationists think otherwise.

If one were to demonstrate a static fossil record or find a chimera (like a crocoduck), that would falsify evolution, despite Ray Comfort's claims to the contrary. Or if humans did NOT having a fused chromosome, but they do.

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou "IF evolution were true, none of those diseases could exist"

So, first we have you acknowledging that the concept of falsification is valid - I guess your video claiming that it is garbage is no longer in vogue. Of course, your test "If evolution were true, then..." has the proper form, but zero understanding of the theory following that. Nothing in the TOE claims that good mutations fix all of the bad mutations. Try reading a science book and not a Chick tract.

[AlanCFA]

1/2

@GSFY "This idea that magical mutations will make things better or more complex is the belief in this 'pseudo science'.

Scientists predicted that tiktaalik would be found in a particular geographical location (Ellesmere Island), in a particular stratum (the Fram Formation), with the features they knew it would posses as predicted by the theory of evolution and the knowledge that this area was near the equator 375 my ago.

[AlanCFA]

2/2

The discovery of tiktaalik was possible because the theory of evolution and the knowledge of the earth's history gave them the understanding of what type of creature would have transitional features between fish and tetrapods. You claim that the theory is a religion, pseudo science, etc and that the age of the earth and the geological history is also unknowable, yet these sciences all came together to accurately predicted this discovery well in advance

You are a Christian creationist, period

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA I read and saw the whole "thing" on this prediction. They were looking to force some fish fossil in to this belief. So, of course they were going to find it. It is not any form of transitional fossil, because there is nothing before it and nothing after it. It just went extinct, as all genetically unfit degraded creatures do. If I wanted to predict where I would find a fish fossil I would go where lots of fish fossils are found. Moron.

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "I read and saw the whole 'thing' on this prediction." They were looking to force some fish fossil in to this belief. So, of course they were going to find it." Nope. It fit the prediction. YOU are the one with the belief system.

"If I wanted to predict where I would find a fish fossil I would go where lots of fish fossils are found"

Oh, in Canada in rocks that are 340my old? Face it, Jimmy, there is massive evidence for evolution and no evidence for your supernatural ghost.

[sweetclaire06]

@GoodScienceForYou As I read this exchange between you and AlanCFA never mind who is right or wrong. He expresses his point of view in a civil manner while you repeatedly resort to nasty name calling and personal attacks. You do this with a 'Religious fervor" that is offensive and undeniable. You do not come off as an educated person. You sound like a fanatical crackpot.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@sweetclaire06 It is all a matter of perspective. It is extremely difficult when you present absolute evidence that cannot be denied, and he denies it. Religious crap, is the major cause of human suffering and this is not different. If we do not learn to stop the rapid genetic degradation going on now, humanity will be illiterate, primitave, retards and go extinct. That is what he represents with his religious beliefs.

The cancer treatment I propose is already being studied/tested.

[sweetclaire06]

@GoodScienceForYou "If we do not learn to stop the rapid genetic degradation going on now, humanity will be illiterate, primitave, retards and go extinct. "

I don't see this at all. I believe humans are constantly setting the bar higher. As a species we are bigger, faster, and smarter.Whether it's sports performance to academic achievement and everything in between, man is constantly evolving and improving.I don't see mankind withering away and going extinct.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@sweetclaire06 Humans have over 4600 now mapped genetic defects that are causing all sorts of diseases and many of them were never recorded even 100 years ago. The same mutations that destroy the immune system, and weaken the heart, lungs, etc also retard intelligence. The primitive belief in evolution is a result of this genetic degradation. According to science with over 88,000 peer reviewed and published papers on gene loss, the evidence is absolute.

[sweetclaire06]

@GoodScienceForYou If we are devolving how come we now have the technology and intelligence to map this gene loss, something we never had before.

BTW, if YOU say we are devolving aren't you acknowledging evolution?

[GoodScienceForYou]

@sweetclaire06 In ancient times, first century, they made gear driven clocks that were extremely precise, and incorporated such ideas as the moon speeding up and slowing down. They build huge buildings that have lasted for thousands of years. It took a scientist over a year to make a copy of this clock. I can write a computer program to calculate the positions of the planets in one day. This mechanical clock is far more advanced than any clock made today. Discovery is not intelligence.

[sweetclaire06]

@GoodScienceForYou "I can write a computer program to calculate the positions of the planets in one day. This mechanical clock is far more advanced than any clock made today. Discovery is not intelligence."

Write the program and send it to me tomorrow and then I'll believe you.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@sweetclaire06 The post is not about that. You don't get it.  Human creativity and intelligence has nothing to do with discovery. If computers were developed in the first century, they would probably be far more efficient in design. The ability to design complex machines by one person is very rare.

[sweetclaire06]

@GoodScienceForYou People back then died at 30 from appendicitis.They didn't live long enough to get the diseases we get to day.How can you claim there is gene loss when you have nothing to compare it to but the last few years when the technology to map it became available.You have no way of knowing.You are measuring it against nothing since that kind of knowledge wasn't available.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@sweetclaire06 I don't claim there is gene loss. The PHD's who send in the 88,000 peer papers on "gene loss" do. The medical community is doing the work to detect diseases. While they are doing it, they discovered there is only gene loss and bad things from these mutations that are supposed to make us better. /watch?v=spuZtAa80qI This is word for word from the US medical site.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@sweetclaire06 It is a quaint idea that your children are better, or healthier, but it is not true. The evidence is in.

In 1948 the rate of daily death from cancer was .06%, with no treatment other than to cut out tumors (now considered to be ineffective), Today we are up to .08% with billions upon billions of dollars spent on sucessful treatments.

And 1 in 3 people will get cancer. 1 in 5 women will have breast cancer. Cancer is a genetic disease.

[sweetclaire06]

@GoodScienceForYou Ha! The REASON for the increase in cancer is people are living longer (another proof of evolution). Cancer is for the most part a disease of older age. So if we are devolving why are we living longer?And don't tell me it's because of better hygiene,disease control, diet etc. Who's responsible for these advancements?

[GoodScienceForYou]

@sweetclaire06 According to these "scientists" you believe, the reason is from genetic mutations and a weakness in the immune system from de-evolution. If you have cancer, you would normally listen to what I am telling you. We have know about how the immune system was designed to destroy cancer cells for at least 30 years.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@sweetclaire06 If you were to remove the medicines, the medical doctors, the treatments, go live in a tiny village with huts, then you would understand. The human genome is weak. Artificial means of survival is also one of the reasons for genetic degradation causing more atrophy of genes.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@sweetclaire06 1/2 Its a matter of perspective. I know that promoting mental illness as science is never a good thing. People who promote the magical evodelusion fairy, are helping with the continual genetic degradation by not accepting it. I set back and observe humanity destroying itself with its belief in religious garbage. The newest religion of magical nonsense is evolution. These retards actually think that humans are getting better, smarter, by denying the absolute evidence in DNA.

[AlanCFA]

@sweetclaire06 "...You do not come off as an educated person. You sound like a fanatical crackpot...."

For more fun and games with GSFY, here is a little video treat: watch?v=K9m3f0RdGBs

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA I don't follow any religion. I have my own. It is based on my own personal experiences with God.

I have never had a prayer that was not answered. It requires humility and the ability to accept God's will. Because I am always pleasantly surprised by what God has given me. 

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou

Is your God a Supreme Being that is supernatural?

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou "I have never had a prayer that was not answered. It requires humility and the ability to accept God's will." You posted on my channel "I pray that you die! And soon!" That prayer was not answered.

As far as humility, who are you kidding? You are an egomaniac. You lie about your IQ, your erudition, your knowledge of math and science, all to boost your ego. You are not humble in any sense of the word.

[AlanCFA]

Repost due to false flagging by GSFY

@GSFY "DNA ONLY shows genetic degradation from a condition of better fitness "

You have NO idea what DNA shows.

"We come from genetic design that was set free on this planet. We were told how to preserve genetic structures by the designer"

Ok, you believe that we were designed, the designer put us on earth and told us "...how to preserve genetic structures" So, I have a simple question. Do you believe the designer is Jehovah? A simple yes or no will do.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@rajusman I told you, you were an idiot, and I could tell that from your first post. You are not wanting to get free of human delusional bullshit, you prefer to live with your delusions in tact as most humans. Sorry for you.

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou "I never believe anyone without absolute evidence."

You believe in God without 'absolute evidence'

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA The obvious isn't obvious until it is obvious. You deny God, because you want to, and for no other reason. It is not about religion, because I have no religion. I don't follow any religion because most are at best weak attempts to know God. You on the other hand are not seeking God, you only see to deny God. That is not a proper way to investigate God or anything. I have studied Evolution for over 43 years, and until the last 10 years we did not have the evidence needed...DNA.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA DNA only points to a really intelligent genetic engineer, no matter how you "flat earth" people deny it.

There is ONLY genetic loss shown in DNA. Mutations only cause a NET reduction in fitness in all multicellular creatures. If you just look at the evidence that is shown in all of it. I put all of your reasons for believing in evolution over on the forum and debunked all of them as only showing degradation.

[GoodScienceForYou]

"My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind."

If you think it is impossible to understand or know God directly, then you won't. If you want to know God, then seek only to find the truth, and avoid all human emotional mental garbage.

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou ". I am the teachers' teacher. It is what I am called" just exactly who calls you that?

On YT and on the Spa forums you are a laughingstock, not the teacher's teacher.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@rajusman Funny how you erased your insulting post.  When morons like you post insults they are giving an open invite for me to pile on the information about how stupid they are. I find that to be interesting. It turns out that you are the stupid one and I am the intelligent one. Yet you post crap like a moron. You uneducated child.

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou "Restoring or supplimenting the person with cancer's body with DNA matched cells to produce normal immune agents that kill cancer is the best and has NO side effects."

What gibberish.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA "Restoring or supplimenting the person with cancer's body with DNA matched cells to produce normal immune agents that kill cancer is the best and has NO side effects." Alan, there are already two tests and studies going on in this direction. Both of them are using other people's immune system to kill cancer. They have killed pancreatic cancer cells with this, the most aggressive an "untreatable" form of cancer.

I suggest that we match what is missing and do gene splicing to make.

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "Alan, there are already two tests and studies going on in this direction" Yes, this month's Discover magazine has a discussion of this. I missed copying the sentence preceding thew one i quoted "People on the verge of dying will spend a lot of money. But they don't need to"

Nonsense. Conventional treatments are conventional because they are the best that we have at this point in time. Advanced genetic therapy is promising, but it is still in development. There is no conspiracy.

[ok250682]

how to cure all kinds of cancer even at the last stage - pls watch -- the Gerson Miracle or Cud Terapii Gersona from parts 1/9 to 9/9 (all explain in english)

[Valerian1]

The cure for cancer has been known and suppressed for decades. The Cure for Cancer is NOT consuming the poisons that CAUSE cancer, and, instead, consuming a tremendous amount of freshly juiced raw organic fruits and vegetables. watch?v=E0CzvhPU5q4 Google Dr. Richard Schulze

[GoodScienceForYou]

@Valerian1 This will help a person filled with bacteria and a diminished, but still functional, immune system. It will not help a person much without the genetics that produce immune cells to fight off cancer.

[FrankieAlfonso]

This guy is the stupidest Doctor ever, nano wow welcome to the matrix

[GoodScienceForYou]

@rajusman I am a genius, and humans as a rule are not smart enough to have the forethought as to all the problems, so they will kill many people, chimps, rats, and eventually realize it is way to complex for the human mind to figure it out. However, humans have lived for thousands of years without cancer, because they had working immune systems. Cancer is natural and we were designed to rid ourselves of it. Mutagens and poor human lifestyle has damaged the DNA that stops cancer.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@rajusman You are just not understanding much. You don't have the capacity to understand reality. Do you know what a waste of time it is to do this? People are always looking for govenernnment grant money to cure cancer, and the love the idea that they are the "good guys" in their work. But they usually waste a lot of time on bullshit and make 6 figure incomes from this crap. In the mean time people are dying.  You are an idiot.

[Vildahallon]

Focus should be on not getting cancer, living healthy is a start.

[Vildahallon]

Why not simple use B17...

[bighands69]

@Vildahallon

Its a myth that is based purely on opinion and not on science and data.

[Vildahallon]

@bighands69 Yes, it was a myth that earth was round as well. Open your eyes, todays cancer treatment simply aint working.

[bighands69]

@Vildahallon

Making statement like todays cancer treats are not working is not a qualifying factor to promote vitamin b17.

The whole vitamin b17 cult is just based on word of mouth and peoples opinions. people will come up with conspiracy theories to promote b17.

[Vildahallon]

@bighands69 "Mouth to mouth" is there any other way? Big pharmaceutical companies are making billions on "their treatment. My father, and two of my uncles died from cancer. With their "superior" treatment. Maybe they would still be alive if they knew about all other treatments. Nature have all solutions, mankind has not. I am not going to discuss this any further, you have your beliefs and i have mine. Si si So So

[bighands69]

@Vildahallon

Unfortunately I know people that have died of cancer as well. There is currently no magic bullets that cure cancer.

Nano drug delivery system are showing a lot of promise. As does using more accurate forms of chemo that can be combined with nano particles.

There is new ideologies that are starting to spring up in medical culture that will slowly change the way we think of cancer. and out of this new tactics are being developed.

[procommenter]

Research vitamin B17 {Amygdalin}. Cancer's a vitamin-deficiency disease akin to scurvy & pellagra. Eat apple, pear, pumpkin, & sunflower seeds.

[287654321]

Sodium Dichloroacetate (DCA)

Hydrogen Peroxide (drink in water)

Sodium Bicarbonate

are all considered deadly to cancer cells.

[procommenter]

There's probably efficacy in these substances with regards to good health but: cancerous cells & pre-embryonic cells are one-and-the same. They are electrostatically-charged negative as is the immune system. Like-charges repel, therefore cancer remains invisible to the immune system. Amygdalin dumps hydrogen cyanide on cancerous cells.

[fff111kkk]

woow great vid

[syedganitaj]

vedio

[thoughtwaretv]

Great video on nanotech! thank you for posting.

There are many more videos just like this at Thoughtware (dot) TV