Added: 2 years ago
From: BeautifulGirlByDana
Views: 17,714
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (76)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i have to revisit this, Please be advised i was punched out for passing this info and standing up to a bully who also supports the mainstream and government report, i wear this shinner with pride. Ron Paul for "FREEDOM"

  • This vid is grrrrrrrrr8 i love to spead it around

  • thaere just not enough views here come on folks spead this vid

  • Remember that the 911 debunkers have nothing except insults and profanity. They will not accept any evidence that refutes their point that we should all just shut up and believe the government in the case of 911.

  • @Daddyo930 thanks for that , just so people know i,m doing a 98 day count down to the 10th anniversary of 9/11 . I can use any and all support , but regardless every videos every day for the next 98 days i will be asking for evidence of body's or seats or luggage or wings from flight 77 and flight 93 in shanks-ville . So every video i do i will spin it to these questions . Best wishes to everyone who simply seeks the truth .

  • the planes that hit the WTC were military planes.. they were modified

    watch?v=_80YfdwJAVk

  • WE NEED A RELIABLE INDEPENDENT NEWS ORGINAZATION, THE MINDS BEHIND 9/11 ALSO CONTROL THE MASS MEDIA AS WELL. THEY DECIDE WHAT WE HEAR, AND IT ONLY SERVES THEIR AGENDA !

  • never be fooled by the counters. youtube resets these 9/11 truther counters. i have seen this over and over.

  • I am veiwer 13.402 i wonder how many of you before me spead the word of this vid there should be a million by now What a bunch of wimps pussys and so on

  • Quiz for the day:

    1. Why is there no evidence of a Boeing 757 at the Pentagon?

    2. What is more durable and impervious to disintegration by explosions and fire?

    a. Jumbo Jets

    b. Muslim Passports

    You have 9 minutes and 11 seconds to complete this quiz*

    *No fair looking in books on physics

  • Remote controlled takeover and crashing of Egypt Air 990 was a test for 9/11.

  • Thank you very much for this video . = p

  • Can someone explain why the flight profile at 3:08 says Egypt air 990?

  • @TheMcilwee They are / he is using it in comparing the speed reported for the Egypt Air as an example. it is done to illustrate in what situations which speeds might occur. He even explains and refers to Egypt air all the way through the next minute.

  • Some of you are such naive sheep...

    9/11 was an inside job in my opinion and many others.

    Great video, 5***** Gonna go watch the full version.

  • if you guys cant even manage to at least except the fact that it is possible for our own country to do this, its only a qawinicendt that when building 7 got destroyed, the only building that the goverment would care aboutsince it housed CIA offices and other goverment corps was completly emtpy by the time of attack, and the plane just hit the right spot on the pentagon so they wouldnt loose anything important, you can at least ask what if? unless your all just mindless drones that sites whentold

  • @Green420God 'qawinicendt ' - is that 'coincidence'? . I'm not making fun of a spelling mistake - I've made enough myself - but that is a pretty brilliant one.

  • "the impact energy goes up as the SQUARE of the speed"

    For some reason the rather uneducated Truthers seem to miss this point in high school science class. So they are confused about how soft aluminum can destroy hard steel columns.

    I bet they are also can't explain how soft lead bullets from my .44 magnum can penetrate steel car doors.

    It's just a sign of how our public schools are just a disaster, and our teachers are incompetent.

  • @MrRiceowlex "Rumsfeld eliminating air marshalls from flights 2 months before 9/11"

    Now that you're proved to be a lying pussy, and that Clinton is the one who killed the Air Marshal program, you're running away like a little girl.

    Typical Truther bullshit. They're all sissies at heart.

  • @LancedeBoil 3 buildings fall into their own footprint , through the path of greatest resistant , at free-fall speeds , n still no video of the pentagon , do you realize that could shut down the truth movement if they had the video it would be all over fox news , flight 77 official story is the there was a abandoned mine shaft in the field ,so why not go down ,get the body's , luggage , seats , engines , lol , lets hear it , and watch your language , or i,ll remove you & your retarded comments

  • @BeautifulGirlByDana "into their own footprint , through the path of greatest resistant , at free-fall speeds , n still no video of the pentagon"

    Repeating lies from a loony website, huh?.

    Buildings fall DOWN. It's called gravity, and no real engineers were surprised. It's only "free-fall" if you can't operate a stopwatch properly.

    The one-acre towers created an 11-acre debris field. Hardly its own footprint.

    You think the Pentagon is ringed with cameras? Nonsense. Not when I was there.

  • @MsgtSpook "You think the Pentagon is ringed with cameras?"

    Why do these idiots think the Pentagon needs cameras? It's an office bldg, not a missile site, and there's a shopping mall inside it OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. You just get off the Metro and take the escalator up to it.

    Nine yrs they've been whining about cameras. There are over 8 million images of the Pentagon on Google image, you can drive right up to it, and still nobody can show even ONE photo of a camera on the outside.

  • @61Chrysler300 I make no claims about the existence of cameras yea or nay at the Pentagon, but your claim here, as if it's JUST 'an office building' is a little absurd. I'd point out that there are numerous non-security, non-military office buildings that have cameras simply for loss prevention, employee safety and other purposes.

    Are you seriously suggesting to me, a taxpayer, that no one at the Pentagon ever thought of installing cameras? That I'm an idiot for thinking they might have some?

  • @LancedeBoil You are a typical government sheep! Lots of bleat but no brains!

  • @LancedeBoil u have no idea what u r talking about.. the Federal Air Marshal Service is now part of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) under homeland security...typical sheeple idiot . watches FOX fake terrorist news and gets everything wrong like the new study shows

  • @LancedeBoil -- Brilliant; Anyone who points out the many inconsistencies, contradictions, flaws & problems w/ the gummint's official conspiracy is a sissie susceptable to Typical Truther bullshit. A common attitude by those who are either naive or ambivalent about the long history of US government's outrageous lies about everything from protecting Nazis, the goodness of our dictator 'friends', bogus justification for wars in Vietnam & Iraq, to 'protecting' our freedom & keeping us 'safe'. FAIL

  • @LancedeBoil

    aww, what's the matter Lance? too many boils? loll

  • @littlelion1972 "I'm a pilot. I would have believed in one sentence that an airliner can't do 510 knots at sea level"

    If you're a pilot -- which is damned unlikely -- you'd know that there's a big difference between what an aircraft CAN do, and what it SHOULD do if it's operated safely.

    And apparently you're too stupid to read what aeronautical engineers say -- that ground effect is irrelevant and that a 757 CAN do that speed at ground level.

    Try AerospaceWeb, you phony fuck.

  • "9/11 TV broadcasts were prefabricated animations"

    Yeah, on 9-11, there were thousands of invisible Photoshop Elves, carefully positioned all over New York so they could magically change every bit of film & footage in thousands of cameras without anyone noticing.

    At the same time they hypnotized tens of thousands of people so they just THOUGHT they saw airliners hitting the WTC.

    This is a whole new level of insanity, even among Truthie Freaks.

  • @legalboxer no your getting the wrong idea, these where not normal 757 planes that struck the building, the point was that they had to be modified planes to move that fast to insure the towers would go down, no one plane could bring those towers down, they where built to withstand multiple airplane hits, they are saying that the goverment modified the planes to gain such speed and take out hte towers because there is no way a terrorist could mod a plane at an airport

  • @Green420God "had to be modified planes to move that fast ... they where built to withstand multiple airplane hits"

    Skip a few bong hits, kid, and read something besides loony-ass conspiracy websites.

    Those bldgs were designed only to withstand LOW-SPEED HITS, with low fuel, and full fuel loads & fires were NEVER factored into it. Being an uneducated faggot, you don't grasp the difference -- that the impact energy goes up as the SQUARE of the speed.

    Dumb fuck.

  • @LancedeBoil let me tell you somthing, the max speed of a 757 is at most mock .99, .01 away from the sound barrior, and thats above sea level, thats more than 22,000 feet in the sky, now, in the official report of the 9/11 committie states, that according to there radar speed and altitude test they ran, the plane hit buy the south tower was going 510 knotts, thats mach 1.25, thats faster than the speed fo sound, however, there is (and any comercial pilot can tell you) no comercial plane that...

  • @Green420God "510 knotts, thats mach 1.25"

    Maybe you should check somewhere besides a crackpot website. 510 kts is only Mach .8, which a 757 cruises at all day. If it weren't for the denser air, it wouldn't even strain the aircraft at all.

    Aerospace engrs state that you CAN fly that speed at ground level -- it's just hard on the airframe, not recommended. Still haven't checked the Aerospace Web, have you? This turd has already been flushed.

    Flt recorder data: tinyurl (DOT) com/2v9kme4

  • @LancedeBoil ...There is no plane that go that fast flying at sea level, there is not dense enough, so that plain had to be modified, or there lieing on there report, watch a movie on my favorits called pilotsfor9/11truth, so why dont you take your big mouth and shut it, its ok to question why, there is plenty of evidence to bring up an ivestigation, and im not a fucking kid, but for an adult you sure do talk like one

  • @Green420God "There is no plane that go that fast flying at sea level"

    Since you've made an idiot of yourself on WTC bullshit, and been proven wrong, you're moving to the Pentagon issues instead?

    Whether you're a kid or just an incredibly stupid adult ... isn't much difference.

  • "Pilots For 9/11 Truth have recently analyzed data"

    Asking pilots to analyze Flight Data Recorder info is like expecting a cabdriver to analyze the computers under the hood of your Cadillac.

    Good luck with that, moron.

  • 6:00

    -29 °C

    LOL

  • "Rumsfeld eliminating air marshalls from flights 2 months before 9/11"

    You might at least do some basic fact checking, dipshit.

    The air marshals were eliminated by that cocksucker Clinton, so he could save a few extra million to pay for all his blowjob lawyers.

    Clinton also cut the number of NORAD hot pursuit jets from 68 to SEVENTEEN, which is why the USAF didn't have a prayer of intercepting the 9-11 jets, even if the transponders had still been working.

  • Assuming that pilots can interpret flight recorder data is like assuming some pimple-faced kid can repair your car's computerized ignition system, just because he has a freakin' drivers license.

    Is the Truthie Cult really this ignorant?

    Yeah, I guess they are.

  • @pilot101st

    Assuming that the official story was consistent, based upon the goal of reaching the truth, or even based upon solid science is like assuming that your government is always out for your best interest. Regardless of background, however, if someone shows me good math, has the numbers to back it up, and presents a good argument, it's at least enough to make me think.

    Apparently, you lost the ability for critical thinking long ago - I hope you enjoy the fluoride in your tap water

  • @antiklaus "if someone shows me good math, has the numbers to back it up, and presents a good argument"

    And your problem with the peer-reviewed papers by Prof Bazant, or Eager & Musso is .... what?

    And why haven't you, or anyone else in the Truther Cult, managed to submit any problems you find to an Engineering or Physics journal, like REAL engineers do?

  • @antiklaus "if someone shows me good math, has the numbers to back it up"

    Yeah, like you've ever read any of the articles by structural engineers that ALL state that planes & fire caused the collapse of the towers. Like you'd even UNDERSTAND their math if you did read them.

    But, being illiterate, you get all your science from crackpot conspiracy websites because you're too fucking dumb to understand any of it.

  • @pilot101st "Is the Truthie Cult really this ignorant?"

    Oh, I think they've proved that again and again.

  • @pilot101st "Is the Truthie Cult really this ignorant?"

    Oh, I think they've proved that again and again.

    Being mostly uneducated losers who flip burgers, or work at the car wash, they can't even understand the math & science involved, so they get suckered by the professional con artists who make millions selling conspiracy bullshit to fools.

  • Maybe NIST did the figures for the aircrafts, and the NTSB did the structual building failure?? LOL

  • @mrriceowlex

    I'm a pilot. I would have believed in one sentence that an airliner can't do 510 knots at sea level. That was my point. A layman would have thought it plausible in one sentence. The remaining 23 minutes should be used to analyze the frame rate of the cameras that recorded impacts, and compare that versus known tower width, hence calculating the real impact groundspeeds. The NTSB may be inaccurate with what shows up in typeface, but the average joe won't know what to make of

  • i was only in 4th grade when this happened, seems like just yesterday i was sitting at home after school that day watching the "News" which i have recently found out were complete bold faced lies!

  • United States Government are terrorists, drug smugglers, war criminals, and horrific liars.

    9-11 was an inside job! 9-11 official story was a lie! What happened to building 7?

    Where's the evidence that kerosene fires melted steel?

    How did the huge molten pools of steel get under the twin towers and building 7?

    Depleted uranium is a weapon of mass destruction!

    Play Wall Street like a PONZI SCHEME!

    The elections are rigged, unsecure voting machines & ballots!

    NASA is a complete FRAUD!

  • Thank you, I learned something on the terminology of Mach vs Knots. I wish the NTSB went back to school. If they are part of the government, then we need to get rid of the whole agency & stop paying for incompetence and colusion in keeping their version of the 'Official Story'.

  • considering that there has hardly been a peep out of the alleged families one would wonder where they are. unless they come forward one can only assume they dont exist and that this was in fact 'operation northwoods' being carried out.

  • @vengencefrom1979 Just peeps from the people who lost friends and family in the buildings, nothing from the supposed planes passengers families except I believe Ellen Mariani.....You'd think the planes families would be overwhelmingly vocal, Rumsfeld taking control of calling for air support days before 9/11. Rumsfeld eliminating air marshalls from flights 2 months before 9/11..C'MON WAKE UP FOLKS....

  • @MrRiceowlex "Rumsfeld eliminating air marshalls from flights 2 months before 9/11"

    Where do you Truthers pick up this bullshit?

    Clinton cut the Air Marshal Program to almost zero, long before 9-11. On 9-11 there were only 33 of them left, covering about 16 flights a day -- out of the 30,000 daily commercial flights in the U.S.

    Do you make this shit up yourself, or copy it from some loony website?

  • @legalboxer so do you never ask questions? what makes you think our goverment wouldnt do somthing like this? when they have done worse in the past? our military is far from honest, and we are far from from a free nation, we dont have any freedoms enymore, or rights, inocent people are still going to jail, and we still have a shitty justice systom, bad medical care, bad schools, what makes you think they care about us? they just care about our military, power, and money, not us

  • @Green420God "do you never ask questions?"

    You're not asking questions -- you're too stupid for that.

    You're just repeating nonsense you read somewhere, without understanding any of it, and making a fool of yourself.

    Too lazy to read what the building architects said about the collapse?

    Too dumb to read all the articles by structural engineers that clearly state that plane strikes & fires caused the collapse?

    Yeah, much too dumb.

  • @Green420God "bad medical care, bad schools"

    Yeah, that's why all the rich kids from every other country are flocking HERE for college, and why every sick rich guy on earth flies over here for treatment.

    Or are you just whining because you're too lazy to get a decent job with health benefits, and expect everyone else to support a failure like you?

  • we cannot trust any data they have given us as the pentagon flight path data is totally wrong, go ask the police on the ground they ' bet thier lifes' on a totally different flight path. if u think a plane hit the pentagon then im sorry to say, u have not looked properly at any photos and if u have and still think a plane hit then yes u are totally immersed in the world of the dumb and blind. something way deeper is going on,

  • Uploaded the full presentation, can't post links so click on my username.

  • Dude, you just took 23 minutes to tell us a

    767 can't do 510 knots at sea level. Thanks.

  • @littlelion1972 He didn't just tell you, he taught you why. There's A HUGE DIFFERENCE AND HE HAS REFERENCES. Congratulations now you won't be misled by the lying mass media and you can set your friends and family straight.

  • don't you all think that such infos,especially from a pilot who flew 175,should be aired on national tv and be taken seriously by pro. journalists...???but it is not going to happen,to afraid of the truth.We do have a lot of proofs that we were lied to about all events on 911,but no media in the US will take the chance to expose the fraud...........

  • @aligoulou

    yeah, sad, cnn likes to "play safe" fucking piece of shit losers cnn shit heads

  • Also, maybe not everyone knows, there are great movies on youtube from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth - titled " Blueprint for truth" - about collapses of all three WTC buildings - including the WTC 7, which was NOT hit by any airplane.

    Close to 1000 professional architects and engineers are members of this movement.

  • More importantly what happened to all the souls on board... Where 'd they go??

    Pentagon was a mystery enough...

  • still ppl running around and talking about big commercial airliners strucked the wtc towers.

    NO THERE WAS NO PLANES ffs, its a tv hoax, there was most likely missiles used on all 4 ocasions, maybe jassms wich look almost like smaller planes and now remember what some witnesses reported whop saw a small comuter or "thought they saw a missile".

    its a lie and the media is complicit, they are not ignorant they are just owned by the very same elite who sacrificed 3000 ppl to gain something.

  • no, definitely two planes at the towers.  one was military there isn't enough video of the first strike to determine.

    pentagon and shanksville were missiles/military craft. Until I see some real convincing work on the laser/holograph theory please stick with what we know.

    BE SMART ABOUT THIS THAT"S THE ONLY WAY PEOPLE CAN BELIEVE!!! READ AND KNOW YOUR STUFF!

  • no one is talking about laser or holograph theories (except disinfo agents).

    im talking about tv fakery.

    there was NO PLANES but most likely missiles like jassms with high speed and thats why some ppl said they saw something like a comuter plane or a missile.

    jassms almost look like a plane but are smaller, however almost all known plane vids have significant problems,some with trajectory,some with missing or "strange" crashphysics ,impossible speeds etc

  • @bizzsnatch

    I agree with your attitude. However, I beg to differ with your self-assured statement that "two planes definitely hit the towers". May I suggest you read and view some relevant findings?

    wwwDOTseptembercluesDOTinfo

    The 9/11 TV broadcasts were prefabricated animations. It is, today, a proven fact.

  • These videos are extremely important as they are irrefutable proof that something is seriously wrong with the official BullShit version of events. Not many debunkernuts appear on these comment boards to shoot down highly qualified and experienced people who KNOW what they are talking about and can't be disputed or shot down in flames, (Figuratively speaking of course).

  • yea, we all fucking know, 9/11 is a shady date, but you will never get answers.

  • we are getting them. the internet gives history its first chance to not let these people get away with what they've been doing for hundreds of years.

    Try to get answers i just to be like you and just say "what am i gonna do about it". Just convince someone, learn, and teach at least one person the TRUTH!

  • aiming for the lowest common denominator is what 9/11 was all about. too bad this vid wont be comprehended by the vast majority of people 9/11 was aimed at.

  • Please spread this video.

    It NEEDS to get out.

    5 stars *****

    Peace

  • The TRUTH always shouts louder then the LIES...

    Hang BUSH, BLAIR, CHEYNEY, BROWN And OBAMA

  • But I have a simulator on my computer where human beings can shoot fireballs from their fingers and have laser beam eyes!!

    Are you trying to tell me that cannot happen in real life either?

    Yes, I think we should use more unverified simulator data to do all kinds of science, there is no knowing what amazing things we could achieve.

  • pt 1 --  Much controversy has surrounded the speeds reported for the World Trade Center attack aircraft. However, none of the arguments for either side of the debate have been properly based on actual data, until now. Pilots For 9/11 Truth have recently analyzed data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board in terms of a "Radar Data Impact Speed Study" in which the NTSB concludes 510 knots and 430 knots for United 175 (South Tower) and American 11 (North Tower), respectively.

  • pt 2 - A benchmark has been set by the October 1999 crash of Egypt Air 990, a 767 which exceeded it's maximum operating limits causing in-flight structural failure, of which data is available to compare to the WTC Attack Aircraft.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more