I can understand the use of this music in its exploration, I just think it tends to be played too fast to where I can't really understand the transitions and they all blend together into tumbling grey pebbles. When you hear something as simple as Prokofiev's the fight for instance, it's played very fast and sounds chaotic, though I can actually understand it. So I'm thinking Schoenberg meant for it to not be understood, unless you analyze it and take what you like from it.
I read Pierrot Lunaire as a dramati-sation of the Belgian debate about poetry in which Giraud's poems translated by Hartleben demonstrate more sympathy for aspects of the rich and powerful Symbolist aesthetic than he is usually credited with.
Within the cycle there are fifty mini cycles, with a degree of formal ambivalence that perfectly matches that of their substance.ABBA, ABAB ABBA is itself a cyclic pattern, first line becoming the last.
Not everything in the world is pleasant, and Schoenberg, as well as other Expressionist artists (Munch, for example) were experimenting with depicting the darker sides of human experience, especially insanity. This piece isn't meant to be pretty or even enjoyable--it's meant to express the degradation of the human mind, and it does that exceedingly well.
Just because the sane (and even gifted) are able to portray insanity doesn't mean that insanity loses much of its eerie power. As we observe in this performance.
You are getting into semantics. For me, any type of organized sound expressing or designed to arouse emotion is Music, notwithstanding whether you like it or not.
Beauty isn't the point of Pierrot Lunaire - it's more meant to be psychological, more than a little scary, and it falls pretty well in line with expressionism. Look up some translations of the lyrics if you really want to see.
@synesthetically It becomes intensely beautiful if you hear it over and over again. Tears you apart actually. In some ways, this is the greatest composition of the twentieth century.
Berlioz, it does touch a lot of human ears. This is a good performance but most of the video should not enter human eyes. Best listened to with the screen minimised. I love PLunaire.
I can understand the use of this music in its exploration, I just think it tends to be played too fast to where I can't really understand the transitions and they all blend together into tumbling grey pebbles. When you hear something as simple as Prokofiev's the fight for instance, it's played very fast and sounds chaotic, though I can actually understand it. So I'm thinking Schoenberg meant for it to not be understood, unless you analyze it and take what you like from it.
Rkmajora 6 months ago
This music haunts me ,I love it ,I cant explain why .
jenko701 6 months ago
wow! reine Kunst! ich kannte das Video noch nicht. Danke
donaldfiebing 1 year ago
I read Pierrot Lunaire as a dramati-sation of the Belgian debate about poetry in which Giraud's poems translated by Hartleben demonstrate more sympathy for aspects of the rich and powerful Symbolist aesthetic than he is usually credited with.
Within the cycle there are fifty mini cycles, with a degree of formal ambivalence that perfectly matches that of their substance.ABBA, ABAB ABBA is itself a cyclic pattern, first line becoming the last.
N6NZE 1 year ago
Not everything in the world is pleasant, and Schoenberg, as well as other Expressionist artists (Munch, for example) were experimenting with depicting the darker sides of human experience, especially insanity. This piece isn't meant to be pretty or even enjoyable--it's meant to express the degradation of the human mind, and it does that exceedingly well.
cinderburster 1 year ago
Just because the sane (and even gifted) are able to portray insanity doesn't mean that insanity loses much of its eerie power. As we observe in this performance.
redkeithh 2 years ago
Comment removed
xerxes575 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it is not music really, it is more emotion expressed through sound.
musicpiano14 2 years ago
well, isn't that what music basicly is...?
OAmus 2 years ago 3
you know what? if it sounds it does not mean that it is music!
musicpiano14 2 years ago
You are getting into semantics. For me, any type of organized sound expressing or designed to arouse emotion is Music, notwithstanding whether you like it or not.
OAmus 2 years ago
Freedom, joy, any feeling, any unpredictable dream ... the limits slightly fixed by the instruments.
gulosian 2 years ago
I don't understand this. Maybe it is beautiful to sophisticated ears, but I just don't get it.
pookiehohn 2 years ago
Beauty isn't the point of Pierrot Lunaire - it's more meant to be psychological, more than a little scary, and it falls pretty well in line with expressionism. Look up some translations of the lyrics if you really want to see.
synesthetically 2 years ago 4
@synesthetically It becomes intensely beautiful if you hear it over and over again. Tears you apart actually. In some ways, this is the greatest composition of the twentieth century.
P1B1U1H1 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You don't understand this joke ? Well man it simply means you are mentally sane. Keep in mind that Zwy Moshe Schoenberg was a fraud, not a composer.
minastronasse 2 years ago
this is the definition of musicianship
edcerc 3 years ago
no it isn't? you just write something like that to get people to give you thumps up.. but i like the piece though.
FredeGF 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
... a great performance of something that should never have touched human ears.
Berlioz13151411 3 years ago
Berlioz, it does touch a lot of human ears. This is a good performance but most of the video should not enter human eyes. Best listened to with the screen minimised. I love PLunaire.
tonyinvan 3 years ago
Barbara Whiff...
Bolinas1971 3 years ago
Splendid.
bybliskaunos 3 years ago
¡Buenísimo!
Dundsany 3 years ago
Totally doing this for my junior recital.
(JK.)
CrystalFlames 3 years ago
@CrystalFlames looolllssssss
falicapte 1 year ago