Added: 9 months ago
From: Nationalgenosse
Views: 2,477
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (155)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Beautiful production. Thanks!

  • Actually National Socialism isn't left or right wing.

  • I cannot take "neo nazis" seriously when they hate on Obama....LOL. If you don't get my joke, you don't need to.

  • Nationalgenosse: Neonazis and skinschweins are failures indeed but let this be known, he is a Christian. Look at his speeches and read all his writtings. I see Biblical Elements in those, he even calls himself a Prophet. He has mentioned God being the creator in the Triumph of the Will film. But the only thing he did truly tolerate was respect for other religions.

  • National Socialism was inevitable when you look at what caused it, Corporate banking economy's "Capitalism" greed and international control of currency led to a backlash in defiance and that backlash was national socialism and Fascism.

  • @khasseki

    Yet all the major capitalists supported the Nazis!

  • @MrReco12

    In Germany, they had to, they didn't have much of a choice. It was either go with the State and support it, or become Nationalized and get smashed.

  • @sanik00

    Exactly like Franco, Pinochet and Mussolini's Rightist regimes. :D

    Oh, and why did Big Business support Hitler seizure of power?

  • @MrReco12

    Oh, the Nationalization of big business was also Incorporated into Stalin Leftist regime. I never recall big business endorsing Hitler in his political campaign,(unless you show me otherwise) only after he came to power I know they helped Germany, seeing it was either collaborate or nationalization.

    But answer me this, why did the working class, and lower - middle class support Hitlers seizure to power in the Reichstag by winning seats and becoming a majority in parliament?

  • @sanik00

    why did the working class, and lower - middle class support Hitlers seizure to power in the Reichstag by winning seats and becoming a majority in parliament?

    The working class mostly voted for the communists and SPD. Capitalists urged Hindenburg to appoint Hitler as chancellor. Krupp and Thyseen were instrumental in funding Nazi election campaigns.

  • @MrReco12

    Yeah, but many farmers in rural area were appealed to the National Socialist ideal, and the Nazis even tried competing with the Communist o their own ground. Never forget that Hitler not only was a rival to leftist organisations such as the SPD, Communist party of Germany and the Marxist party, but also right wing parties such as the the DNVP, which he annexed and slowly dissolved.

  • @sanik00

    The strasserists were socialists but the the Rightwing of the Nazi party(which included Hitler) supported "private enterprise" and were against economic socialism and equity.

    Alfried Krupp, as he admitted during his trial, claimed that Hitler gave his buisness a healthy environment to prosper.

  • @MrReco12

    Yes, Krupp's profits did increase during WW2, with slave labor supplied by the Third Reich.

    However, Military Law and the German State later decreed, and for security reasons, " that work should be performed by free German workers" .

    Possibly the only reason i can see that Krupp and Daimler - Benz, Hugo Boss and BMW escaped Nationalization is because of their eagerness for collaboration and usefulness to the Reich by assisting in their struggle against the Allies.

  • @MrReco12

    But, Back then Hitler made several remarks on how they were a Socialist party, and even wanted to name it the "Social Revolutionary Party" "We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."

  • @MrReco12

    But yeah, one most not confuse that Hitler did not endorse Marxist Socialism in his quotes, and that The socialism he ( Early on and/or perhaps later) and other Nazi officials talked about were their own ideology and take on Socialism, National Socialism.

    The Nazis were not Marxist, and Hitler had nothing to do with Communism or the more well known form of Socialism known today.

  • @MrReco12

    hahahah , it may be true. well then what about the 25 point party program? I know Hitler had negative thought about this later on when he was in power, and rarely spoke of it, but he refused to disband the program or add anything else it. Also, the propaganda posters with disfranchised workers and families on them, the red on the Nazi flag, symbolizing socialism.

  • @sanik00

    It may be, but Hitler is also reported saying "We stand for the maintenance of private property... We shall protect free enterprise as the most expedient, or rather the sole possible economic order."

    The 25 point program was,as you said, largely ignored by the Nazis(except for the anti Jewish measures Hitler was responsible for). I think Strasser, Feder, Drexler etc. were responsible for the economic socialists aspects of the program(profit sharing etc.)

  • @MrReco12

    Yeah, Hitler insisted that they must protect private initiative, only if they were " eligible" ( obeying the State and serving it rather then the State serving greedy CEO's and businessman.) Notice that the companies that survived WW2 had a close relationship with the Nazis, but what happened to companies that were purely interested in profit and not assisting the Reich or following furthering it's goals.

  • @MrReco12

    But The German Labor Front had some nice perks for workers such as the: Strength through Joy, Beauty of Work and the Reich Labour Service programs.

  • @sanik00

    "Thoughts and tasks about the future".

    Hitler's state was similar to Franco and Mussolini's regime. workers wages did decline during the Nazi period, but business profits expanded. workers wages went down by 25% while the profits of IG Farben executives increased by 400%.

  • @MrReco12

    Really, CEO's got a 400% increase in salaries? While workers got only 25%? Were they apart of of the German Labor Front?

  • @sanik00

    IG Farben leaders enjoyed the increase in profits(405%), William Shirer(a foreign corespondent at the time) believes that the average increase was 150% while workers wages declined by 25%.

  • @MrReco12

    "Krupp and the other big businessmen were simply servants of the State. Socialism is strictly an economic system and can be operated on a national or international basis. Nazism based it on racial and anti-bourgeois Nationalism."

  • Comment removed

  • @MrReco12

    "Krupp and the other big businessmen were simply servants of the State. Socialism is strictly an economic system and can be operated on a national or international basis. Nazism based it on racial and anti-bourgeois Nationalism."

    "When he (Papen) demanded the floor in order to read it, newly elected Reichstag president Göring pretended not to see him, his Nazis had decided to support the Communist motion."

  • @MrReco12

    You can even find early Nazi campaign posters that stress their relationship to Lenin Communist party.

  • @sanik00

    Hardly, Hitler hated Lenin and the Soviets.

    watch?v=qhgFFntBQYk

    watch?v=YeaMRGzoYmE

  • Comment removed

  • @sanik00

    Socialism= public owns the means of production and wealth is redistributed.

  • @MrReco12

    "All production activities were directed by the Reich-Ministry of Economics"

    If you look at Stalin's dictatorship the State owned the means of production, serving the public.

    Hitler insisted on protecting private initiative for business's ONLY if those companies served the goals of the state before profit, and were also supervised. For example Krupp, IG Farben, BMW and Daimler Benz were allowed to remain private because they were building war munitions and armaments for the Reich

  • @MrReco12

    Goebbels wrote a passage in his diary claiming that Germany must " Destroy the Jewish Bolshevism ( In the Soviet Union) and replace it with the true form of Socialism"

  • @sanik00

    Goebbels also said(according to the Otto Strasser) that Hitler represented the "petit bourgeoisie".

    Papan did vote for the enabling act: the most crucial legislation that lead to Hitlers rise to power!

  • Comment removed

  • @MrReco12

    The Strassers wanted to Nationalize everything including the Banks, which Hitler viewed as Bolshevism, and financial suicide for the Party. Instead, Hitler supervised the Banks, but allowed them to remain privately owned. Goebbels, did question loyalty to Hitler, however he remained loyal to him until the end and wrote that quote i mentioned above far before the one you mentioned ( If proven true of course.)

  • @MrReco12

    I don't recall Goebbels ever saying that about Hitler, although i expect Otto Strasser would have. Regardless, Goebbels was devastated when Hitler did not Nationalize every business left right and center and the banks, as well as disbanding the SA who were viewed as ultra revolutionary

  • @MrReco12

    "Conscious of his own increasing marginalization, Papen began covert talks with other conservative forces with the aim of convincing Hindenburg to dismiss Hitler"

    "Neither Papen nor his conservative allies waged a fight against the Reichstag Fire Decree in late February or the Enabling Act in March" - I can't explain why the wouldn't have resisted this, but by using the term " a fight" I can see, they were expected to object to Hitler's seizure to Power.

  • @sanik00

    Well i basically agree with you, their was a leftwing element in the Nazi party but it was marginalized and wiped out during the 1934 night of the long knives and it the Nazis adopted state capitalism(pragmatism). HItler was disinterred in economic matters apparently.

  • @MrReco12

    Yeah, but even after Strasserism was purged from the party, I can still see the State dominating every aspect from peoples lives similar to Stalin by, controlling the economy ( Reich ministry of Economics), building relations with workers by administering the VolksWagon project, the Nazi trade union The German Labor Front, Social welfare for workers, higher payments ( At the expense of No Striking), public access to healthcare, and nationalization of business which didn't cooperate.

  • @sanik00

    The Nazi trade union was more of an organization that controlled workers: no collective bargaining, no strikes etc.

  • @MrReco12

    "Employers could demand more of their workers, while at the same time workers were given increased security of work and increasingly enrolled into social security programmes for workers. The organisation, by its own definition, combated capitalism, liberalism, but also revolution against the factory owners" - Yeah strikes were forbidden, but a pay rise, come on :D

  • @MrReco12 "The employees were given relatively high set wages, security of work, dismissal was increasingly made difficult, social security programmes were started by the Arbeitsfront, leisure programmes were started, canteens, pauses and regular working times were established, and therefore generally the German workers were satisfied by what the DAF ( German Labor Front) gave them in repaying for their absolute loyalty"

  • @sanik00

    I have read several sources that workers wages declined by 25% under the Nazis.

  • @MrReco12

    "Papen toyed with the idea of betraying Hitler by ousting him from the cabinet, and becoming chancellor himself." - Yes, the Nazis sure could rely on Conservative, Capitalist and Reactionary support.

  • @MrReco12

    "Hitler's patience with his conservative allies was limited, and the DNVP representatives in his first Cabinet were quickly bullied into resignation. Shortly thereafter, DNVP members were coerced into joining the NSDAP or retiring from political life altogether. The party dissolved itself and shortly after this the founding of political parties was outlawed in 1933." - The Nazis didn't only attack left wing parties..

  • @sanik00

    True, although it was worth noting that he supported rightwing movment around Europe. Franco's coup against the leftist government for example.

  • @MrReco12

    Yes, but seeing as how Franco was an enemy of Internationalism and Marxism, same as Hitler, as well as Capitalism, it seemed like they had a common enemy." The enemy of enemy is my friend" I know what your saying though. It's hard to describe whether the Nazis were left wing or right wing. It's debatable.

  • @MrReco12

    "the following year, the DNVP became the only significant party to support Franz von Papen in his short tenure as Chancellor. Performing badly in subsequent elections, the party ended up as junior coalition partners to the NSDAP in the so-called, short-lived Regierung der nationalen Konzentration on Adolf Hitler's appointment as Chancellor in 1933, supporting the Enabling Act that authorised Hitler's government with legislative powers." Papen needed Nazi support for a majority.

  • Funny I just posted this on an American National Socialist youtube vid and ridiculed them for thinking they represent National Socialism, they don't their just racists, yes they have some similar political ideas but they don't understand the true meaning of the political theory.

  • What is the music to this video please?

  • whitepride2316.webs.com We all need to unite and come back together and bring back the real national socialism!

  • Check out the article 'The Origins of Pseudo-National Socialism' by H. Michael Barrett. It's the best comparison ever offered of the enormous differences between the real National Socialists and the so called "American Nazis."

  • please message me if your looking for a new group that isnt a waste of time like the NSM. we are concerned with issues of today, not living in the paste

  • Well obviously they were socialist hence National "Socialist".

  • @Chickenwing1313

    Try to tell that to Stormfront right-wingers such as Winfriedification who believe National Socialism was against any Socialism and was right-wing and the same as Fascism. This false, corrupt "far-Right" postwar agenda, which serves the system, is a real problem because the original NS leaders can't defend themselves against hijackers and corrupt postwar nonsense propagated by both sides, the New Left and White Nationalism.

  • @Nationalgenosse I totally agree with you. I think NS was, and still is, so ahead of it's time that people can't really comprehend why it was created and what it was about. They think it was all about hating jews and being evil. People don't see the "rope" as Nietzsche described. The portrait that the media has made, such as NS's being violent and crude is endorsed by "Neo-Nazis". It's laughable really, but saddening at the same time.

  • @Nationalgenosse The whole idea of NS is the removal of class boundaries and the acceptance of a unified race. And that your placement in life should be determined by merit and your innate worth. NS Germany was extremely protective of its own industries, had plenty of nationalized firms and was pro Union (real unions not the filth we have today). Stormfront can be laughable, I've encounter pro Ayn Rand losers just as an example.

  • @Nationalgenosse But I don't think NS is strictly a German thing. I'm of the belief that any white Nation can adopt its principles.

  • Wow, these are some of the most compelling images I've seen. Always awe-inspiring.

    Great job.

  • My understanding largely marries with yours. But don't be too hard on the Neos. More often than not the seeming negativity arises from confronting situations the cowards won't. There is understandably huge disaffection amongst those who hold to the importance of racial heritage, and this sometimes leads to a false course being run; but damning Neos is akin to bourgeois liberal hypocrisy.

    NS was the return of Grace to the world. We honor it by holding to its highest ideals, not chastising.

  • What can I say. The world has been following wrong 'leaders' so far. Just because others are following a leader doesnt mean I have to choose the same.

  • Nationalgenosse, you've made a good point. Also, Stormfront was the first pro-White site on the Internet, is still the most popular, and has been consistently moving in the right direction whether the cultists like it or not.

  • Check out the remarkable article 'The Origins of Pseudo-National Socialism' by H. Michael Barrett. It can be found on Stormfront's Advance Scout forum, where the only complete synthesis of the pro-White forces is even occurring.

  • National socialism was probably the best time for Germany. So prosperous. So loyal.

  • What's so wrong with being right wing?I'm not racist. I always see leftists as being anti gun, pro abortion,etc. I don't really picture that when I see nazis.

  • I'm right wing and I'm not racist... I fully support national socialism if you ask me.

  • What music did you use, who is the author? It' s very moving.

  • Interesting video.

  • ridiculous everyone, europe, the democrats and the democrats themselves tell you that they're right wingers even germany. And yet u still think they are stupid... maybe you're the stupid one

  • @UrOdal And how are they any different from any other fascist anywhere?

  • There is "national socialism" that did change, many neo-nazis know about the original NS

  • ...of the net and work towards something. If the nearest Org near you isn't exactly 100% ideal - guess what, neither was the DAP when Hitler joined!

    That's why you work within it to educate those around you to the right path, rather than found an entirely new sect simply because the Org isn't up to the correct standards yet - once again, neither was the DAP!

  • ...True NS but also active in the real world will be a little busier trying to achieve something substantial - and educating those WN, neo-Nazis, etc about True NS in the process. That's what it means to live by another fundamental element of NS - "the common good before self-interest, ALWAYS". Armchairmen tend to repeat that phrase a hundred times for every half of a second that they actually attempt, in failure, to live by it. To put the common good before self-interest means to get up off...

  • ...national level.

    Back to neo-Nazis. If the entire force of those who are WN, neo-Nazis, left-wing anti-capitalists, indeed all forces across the board who share the inward yearning for better days - if all of those forces were molded into a single fighting entity, the Revolution would occur at the drop of a hat, and it's to this end that those of us who are true NS work towards. Armchair theoreticians such as yourself can prattle on about True NS all day long - those of us who are not only...

  • Simply from talking with some of them, you get the impression that they simply haven't had anyone explain what NS is truly about to them, but instead have been engaged in a stagnant debacle of the blind leading the blind.

    Hitler was a Christian, but different from the multitudes who claim the title 'Christian'. This is because Hitler was a Christian in deeds more than words. He didn't rant on about the religion in his speeches - he was too busy implementing the teachings of Christ, on a...

  • ...Hitler stated from some of his first public speeches until the moment he achieved power - "we have just one goal: the destruction of Marxism/the Marxist Party in Germany!" (paraphrased)

    NS is neither left-wing nor right-wing. It's a synthesis of elements of both to create a new system that destroys the left-right paradigm.

    All of this being said, yes, unfortunately a majority of so-called "National Socialists" are far from being such. However, at least they're trying to do something.

  • Compare that, said by Marx, to the most basic element of National Socialism - the application of the Eternal Laws of Nature to the sphere of humanity!

    Read 'The Communist Manifesto' and compare that with what Hitler speaks of in MK, and you'll see what I'm talking about. It influenced him because he desired to counter it in every aspect with a German Socialism.

    Also, this isn't by Hitler, but by Goebbels. "Marxism will die so that Socialism may live."

    Additionally, remember what...

  • ...that Hitler was a Marxian, this is foolish to anyone who has read into Communist theory, read MK and compared what Hitler sought with what Marx sought. Hitler states that Marxism influenced him a great deal - and that's true. It influenced him to the extent that he was able to come up with an ideology/philosophy that not only countered Marxism, but tore it to shreds. Just one example is the quote from the Communist Manifesto where Marx claims that his movement rejects 'eternal laws'.

  • whatsoever in common with a vast majority of 'Christians' and 'Christianity'-inspired organizations and bodies today, including almost all of the ones I've met personally. Don't forget the 25th Point. If Hitler had simply wanted to win the Christian vote, then he could've devoted a lot less to it and simply relegated its place in his philosophy to a few footnotes. He didn't do that, however. Never forget what the Protocols say about 'that pesky Christian religion'.

    Now, regarding your claim...

  • ...self as an anti-Christian. The reality is, if one looks into those sources, they're found to be dubious at best and traitorous at worst. Bormann, who was indeed anti-Christian, tried to paint Hitler as such. Likewise, Himmler, whom Hitler called foolish because of his obsession with the occult. Hitler was surrounded by anti-Christians, but he, himself, was a Christian to the core of his being. Once again, it must be stated that the Christianity I speak of has - not a little - but nothing...

  • The reason I bring up 'Table-Talk' is because you seem clearly influenced by it. Regardless of the fact that the words 'Uentermensch' and 'Uebermensch' don't occur a single time in Mein Kampf (yes, I'm referring to the German MK, although the English translations also don't have anything equally those terms). Regardless of whether or not you're influenced by 'Table-Talk' in particular, the fact clearly remains that you're infuenced by the myriad of falsehoods that claim to show Hitler's true...

  • Other than that, I agree with everything you've said. While my contact with the Leader of the NSM in America has given me the impression of someone genuine, the organization is infested with fools and conservatie, burgeoise 'nationalists'.

  • Additionally, the only reliable information on Hitler are his public talks, publically recorded statements, and of course Mein Kampf.

    'Table-Talk' is not only unreliable, but blatantly false. It's one of the numerous attempts to separate True Christianity from National Socialism, because if modern Christians realized what Christianity had started to become in the Third Reich, they would flock to NS. Instead, the falsehoods of 'Table-Talk' and others are peddled as the Jews laugh it up.

  • Christianity is religious NS, and NS is political Christianity. Compare what Jesus taught to what Hitler spoke of. The two are one in the same. By Christianity, I don't refer to a single denomination, Catholic sect, indeed a vast majority of organized sects today who have sold themselves for a few extra dollars.

    In order to understand how Christianity and National Socialism are the same, read the New Testament and read Mein Kampf. Nothing more needs to be done to come to an understanding.

  • @lundvithr If you look at the true roots of Christianity, you will return to India, in the Trimurti/ Trinity/ Triades/ Triquetra of the Aryans. And you can discover that reading the Gospels is like reading the Puranas of Khrishna/ Christos, because Yesu is a name meaning 'Love' and one of the most ancient Names of the God Khrisna. And Yesu Nozrì doesn't mean 'of Nazareth', but Nath Raj, 'King of the Nath Lineage'. The Naths or NAZ are meant to be the Lords in Rg Veda Poem of Creation.

  • Ah, and fascism wasn't right or left oriented! Who tells it is just a stupid Capitalist!

  • good video mate

  • Stormfront is for Dummies...

  • A last thing: the music is enchanting. Can you tell me the title?

  • @UrOdal I perfectly agree. No culture, no noble conception from the Roman Empire and the Holy Roman- German Empire or from the real European and continental tradition. Britishes cannot call themselves 'ROMA' as Italia, Germania, Turchia, Russia, can do. US believe to be the Forth Reich or the Forth Rome,but they lack the comprehension that when the Roman Empire and the Holy Roman Empire conquered,was used also to build and create wealth.US are able only to massacre and destroy cultures.

  • I will be honest: as historician and researcher, this is one of the rarest videos really well done on Hitler: no propaganda and no demonization, but a sober 'equilibrium'. Good work. By the way: I'm Italian, and as you said, only Italians in the 'Ventennio di Mussolini' and Germans can understand what fascism and nazionalsozialism were in truth.But history ha been re- written by winners.And they lied and still lie, on everything.

  • I will be honest: as historician and researcher, this is one of the rarest videos really well done on Hitler: no propaganda and no demonization, but a sober 'equilibrium'. Good work.

  • Important message /watch?v=b98tDLXNYOc

  • I could not agree more with you, this is the truth, that pile of scum has nothing to do with true National Socialism. Great video!

  • At least the true Nazis were socialist and not the phony capitalist scum called Neo-Nazis / Skinheads / White Nationalists, worse than Zionism and the Vatican.

  • @DieLinkeSozial They are the first to serve well the agenda of Atlantic NWO. And the Vatican was a sober and national entity, linked to respect of people, until Pope Albino Luciani was murdered. Then, with John Paul II the CIA entered the Vatican, and now we have a very weak Church unable to oppose to the globalists' banksters' agenda.

  • Very Nice Job. Thanks.

  • I would like to have a friendly discussion with u on this topic though we may agree as far as governmental and economic policy we seem to agree far more on self respect and culture pm me if you wish

  • I do agree that the way many of the American nationalists choose to express themselves in style and body alterations is very negative... I have long argued against this however the ideals I still find promising if only they could try to look more like Richie and Potsy from the Happy Days as I do instead of like a bunch of trendy people on the Jersey Shore....or Miami Ink.... no one in the American mainstream will ever respect a white who mutilates himself and isn't clean cut and well spoken

  • The thing is that Stormfront is American and in being American they believe the individual can muster the most good this is because America is still a wilderness with vast open spaces waiting to be tamed Europe on the other hand is a collectivist place which is building on a 5000 yr old tradition and civilization that needs to be managed delicately one is the old world and one is the new n National Socialism is for the old while Individual Freedom is for the new economically for whites ofcourse

  • Anything touched by the Anglo-Saxon is destined to degrade. I have a special disgust reserved just to them.

  • @Progisby

    I agree with you here. I'm not Anglo-Saxon personally, I don't know what happened to this once germanic tribe, maybe it's because they became isolated on the British Isles and then came to America as immigrants. I'm against Judeo-Christianity and Anglo-Saxon Reactionism.

  • @Volksgenosse18 The Jew and Anglo-Saxon goes together like fire and oxygen. I often have a hard time differing who is who, they are both as self-righteous, have a smiliar sadistic humour and are equally obsessed with money.

  • @Progisby The connection began a long time ago, before 1600, when the Morgans and Stanleys and the Rotschilds and the Mocattas left Amsterdam, Venice, Augusta, Madrid, and all the Europeans capitals, to go to UK and built the ships for going to America. Then they began to act as pirates ( the Morgans ) and as bankers ( the Rotschilds ) at the service of the Queen, attacking the economies of the catholics kingdoms ( like that of Philip II of Spain ) and the spanish 'Armada'for conquering the sea.

  • @Progisby The connection began a long time ago, before 1600, when the Morgans and Stanleys and the Rotschilds and the Mocattas left Amsterdam, Venice, Augusta, Madrid, and all the European capitals, to go to UK and build the ships for going to America. Then they began to act as pirates ( the Morgans ) and as bankers ( the Rotschilds ) at the service of the Queen, attacking the economies of the catholics kingdoms ( like that of Philip II of Spain ) and the spanish 'Armada'for conquering the sea.

  • "You cannot polish a turd".... LOL...

  • Somebody HAS to say the truth and HAS to present the facts. We can't expect postwar Leftists to do this job because they need phony right-wing Neo-Nazi scum to "prove" their own propaganda like ZOG does. Besides real National Socialists, NOBODY but us will ever ADMIT that these Neo-Nazis have nothing to do with National Socialism. Don't expect the dumb masses, the politically correct Marxists and Liberals to do it, they're happy that so many people believe Neo-Nazis to be the real deal.

  • "British Israelism, or contemporary, Christian Identity, whose followers claim that whites, not Jews, are the true Israelites of the Tanakh and that non-whites have no souls, and White Nationalism are nothing more than Gentile rendition of Talmudism. Not to forget to mention that it was the A-S White Nationalist empires of Britain and America that carried out the execution of Germany." Very true quote from my guestbook made by Progisby

  • @Nationalgenosse You wrote 'The NSDAP wasn't right-wing, it wasn't a pragmatic fascist group like Italy's Nationalists and Hitler wasn't a fucking Conservative'I'm Italian and I think you have to study better,because Italy' s fascism wasn't a conservative movement:in the famous 'Ventennio', Italia was gifted by a renewal in industry and national product: cinema, local manufacturers, the first sindacal movements under Dino Grandi and Roberto Farinacci,a more elastic society was done for people.

  • @Nationalgenosse Daring comments Nationalgenosse. Daring, challenging but ... very true. The only exception that I take is with you putting all StormFronters in the same bag. Trust me. There are some people on Stormfront who think deeply about these issues and agree with you. Thanks for the vid, your comments and all the helpful links.

  • @Nationalgenosse So...please tell us how wrong are they, and why we should all pay attention to German fascist, national socialism as the answer to the human social-political dilemma?

  • @Nationalgenosse You couldn't have said that any better. Hitler would have skinheads shot in the street and then strung up to rot from poles.

  • @MrSpemat

    I understand. Shaving one's head and getting tattooed.... like the enemies of Hitler in the labour / concentration camps looked like. Makes "sense" to me. Isn't it funny how all the Skin- and Boneheads look like actors playing the victims of the "Holocaust"? Not that I believe what Hollywood and the mass media tell people, but the irony is that these Skinheads really look like those who worked in the camps.

  • @UrOdal

    No, I suppose not. And I know from experience that other WN organizations have the same anti-NS intellectualism, for example the NSM of America, who dress like National Socialists, but tolerate all kinds of Conservatism and big business, or the British Combat18 / Blood & Honour Boneheads, whose leaders are also corrupt and non-german and anti-socialist, pro Christian etc. Aryan Nations was another fake.

  • proto skinheads are an embarracement;they invent their own history and are unfocused arbitrary haters that are just in it because there is fuck all else to do for them..

    Its no more than a scene and should be treated with distrust even in this age and backdrop that makes them seem more legitimate.

  • @Schutzgemeinschaft

    Yeah, it's really true. Winfredflintstonefiction must be in love with the koshers and the Jesuits, the bankers, the big business capitalists, the American way of life, the CIA-made TV and history books. What a joke.

  • What a wonderful video. Beautiful. If I see Neo-Nazis I wanna puke, but this video is really a nice one.

  • It's natural to puke when one sees the phonies calling themselves "Nazis", but in reality are intellectually incompetent overweight champions of the Reaction and big Capital. As if an international Commie invented them just to prove his Soviet propaganda is "correct". What a dumb bunch of people. Would Hitler have them all killed? Well..... we will never know.

  • @Nationalgenosse When they talk about Aryanism, this is the field where they lack of culture most: Arya is a sanskrit word, 6 times mentioned in the Rg Veda so dear to Hitler and Mussolini ( Mussolini and Ciano guested twice hindu Masters as Gandhi and Rabindranath Tagoré in Roma ), an Aryan is first of all a person 'noble in spirit' who refuse slavery in every form. Then, it is a name for some ancient populations which have the termination in Arya/Alya/Anya,from East India to West Europe.

  • @UrOdal

    Yes, comrade, WN is shitty like this person below us. Winfredflintstonefiction lol

  • The same people who hate Russian "National Bolsheviks" would also hate the "Nazi-Sozi" of Germany if they knew what National Socialism really was. These stupid phony Neo-Nazis are nothing but a serious cancer in Europe and America, they're full of shit and reactionary drivel. Fuck Capitalism and all its internationalist products.

  • Epic facepalm. You guys don't know anything about history or politics.

  • HA HA HA.

  • @Winfriedification

    That was a good joke.

  • Heil Hitler!!!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more