@faisalindustry164u8 wait the dinosaur in part 5 was really bigger than giganotasaurus, didn't they say it was to big due to extra bones? if i'm wrong do you know its name yet?
so that large predator they discovered at the end was bigger than the 1st one, but it didnt seem that big compared to the tyrannosaurus. is that dinosaur from Jurassic park real ?
@olliemad Yes it is real but the movie Jurassic Park is still far from a perfect example of how Dinosaurs once were. Jurassic Park came out in 1993 and this video was made around 1995. The dinosaur in that movie that they called Valosaraptor did hunt in packs and live together but that dinosaur has another name because for the movie they just gave it the name Valosaraptor. The real Valosaraptor was just abit bigger than a turkey and had feathers.
@WayneWiblin As the film came out they found the Utahraptor, which fits the portrail in the film. Other Dromaeosauridae were even bigger, Achillobator seems to be 20ft long.
Interesting that every animal in the park was Cretaceous, not Jurassic.
@TheLogankahle "how large predators behaved" i know why you are confused, the word large wasn't referring to the word how, it was referring to the word predators; read this: how 'large predators' behaved - get it, small predators, or large predators. he didn't mean large behavior, he meant large predators. i had to figure it out too LOL....
(in part 5) Given that currie says its too RARE to have been the result of a flood washout, and too co-incidental that only they, and no other species were found there. then WHAT could possibly have KILLED 12 tyrannosaurs (albertasaurus) all at the SAME TIME? I'm curious as to why he didn't present THAT as one of his questions. It certainly wasn't the meteor, that was a completely different time period. Does anyone have any idea what could have killed 12 of these ferocious beasts all at once?
Well I don't think it was predator trap or they were washed up but I still don't understand how can it proves that they lived together? When a daddy dies, the rest of the pack also doesn't die at the same time? Don't they move on? How could all of them die together at theh same time?
@ThaOneChrisJONES Not really, the asteroid impact (depending how far they were from the ground zero) would have dispersed them and spreaded them far apart from each other.
I think, they might have died due to a disease or something but again not all of them would have caught the disease and died at the same time. Who knows?
@attractivue Obviously we can never know for certain what killed them together, but it's not impossible, either. Look up the "Fighting Dinosaurs" fossil. I can name several ideas just off the top of my head: Flash flood drowned them, Forest fire caught them against a cliff, rock slide buried them, One got rabies and killed the others. I'm sure with a bit more time to ponder it I can come up with a bunch more, each as valid as the last because we simply don't know.
These guys just recolored and RECYCLED animations of Diplodocus and Allosaurus. Giganotosaurus had very different proportions than Allosaurus, and Argentinosaurus wasn't even related to Diplodocus.
Plus diplodocus was a very slim sauropod, these guys made it all bulky.
@TheLogankahle It means we are changing the way we thought they acted. For example: We thought large meat eating Dinosaurs like T-Rex lived a solitary life ( by themselves ), when they are now discovering things that point to the possibility that they lived in packs. Thus changing the way we thought they behaved.
@Koga33525 Scientists as a whole are a pretty skeptical bunch. You find single skeletons, you use logic--it was alone when it died, it must have been alone when it was alive. This discounts the idea that it WASN'T alone when it died--that is, it was part of a pack and died, then the pack moved on. The reason you discount this idea is because you don't have any evidence that the animal DID hunt in a pack. In science, you must have proof if you want your hypothesis to become a theory.
In other words, lets form a pack and go kill a stupid looking, medium sized argentinosaurus by singleling him out of if pack and perhaps stay together if my friend doesnt bite me.
@lebrede I think you're going to find that the "Pack" wasn't anything like a wolf pack, or even a pack of Velociraptors. They were more likely something like a band of crocodiles, sticking together because they had a better chance of getting food if they stayed near each other. Crocodiles have very similar brains to giant therapods of the past, and crocodiles hang out in pretty large groups, often attacking large prey together.
Oh my god, what really surprises me is all those scientists stick to their facts and mix it up with their own feelings, like that lesbian museumcurator or whatever she was. Only two scientists have a passion for animals and for their work. Just like those managers from today, stupid people who never worked hard in their lives. This is what happens if people really work hard, with intellect and passion of course.
Spinosaurus is larger than both T-Rex and Giganotosaur, but ate fish like crocodiles (look at a Baryonyx and imagine it with a HUGE sail on the back). Spinosaurus had long hollow teeth so not really strong for big prey like a saurapod. Giganotosaur on the other hand was like a Allosaurus so basically it ate meat and not fish. So technically its the biggest meat eater known present day.
@iDumbAzn I think you will find that Fish ARE meat. Spinosaurus may have also preyed on smaller land animals, when opportunity arose, much like crocs do.
Tarbosaurus had a really cool skull... a lot like T. rex, very massive, but the lower jaw had this crazy locking mechanism that T. rex didn't have. So basically Tarbosaurus could lock its jaws on a prey and NEVER let go until it killed the prey. This was good for attacking the neck of a hadrosaur or a small sauropod.
@AznNinja96 That's because the images they show are just recolors of the Walking With Dinosaurs Allosaurs.
tklarenb 1 month ago
those new giant meat eater looks like a giant allosaurus
AznNinja96 7 months ago
@faisalindustry164u8 wait the dinosaur in part 5 was really bigger than giganotasaurus, didn't they say it was to big due to extra bones? if i'm wrong do you know its name yet?
Hentarded 8 months ago
Comment removed
Hentarded 8 months ago
There are other ways of hunting. A Kimodo Dragon will give you a quick nip, then follow you around for a week while you die of septicemia.
Are these carnivors taking live prey?
Whole eco-systems, lasting millions of years, and all we have are these tiny clues.
gamesbok 8 months ago
so that large predator they discovered at the end was bigger than the 1st one, but it didnt seem that big compared to the tyrannosaurus. is that dinosaur from Jurassic park real ?
olliemad 10 months ago
@olliemad Yes it is real but the movie Jurassic Park is still far from a perfect example of how Dinosaurs once were. Jurassic Park came out in 1993 and this video was made around 1995. The dinosaur in that movie that they called Valosaraptor did hunt in packs and live together but that dinosaur has another name because for the movie they just gave it the name Valosaraptor. The real Valosaraptor was just abit bigger than a turkey and had feathers.
WayneWiblin 9 months ago
@WayneWiblin As the film came out they found the Utahraptor, which fits the portrail in the film. Other Dromaeosauridae were even bigger, Achillobator seems to be 20ft long.
Interesting that every animal in the park was Cretaceous, not Jurassic.
gamesbok 8 months ago
@TheLogankahle "how large predators behaved" i know why you are confused, the word large wasn't referring to the word how, it was referring to the word predators; read this: how 'large predators' behaved - get it, small predators, or large predators. he didn't mean large behavior, he meant large predators. i had to figure it out too LOL....
MrDBarch 10 months ago
(in part 5) Given that currie says its too RARE to have been the result of a flood washout, and too co-incidental that only they, and no other species were found there. then WHAT could possibly have KILLED 12 tyrannosaurs (albertasaurus) all at the SAME TIME? I'm curious as to why he didn't present THAT as one of his questions. It certainly wasn't the meteor, that was a completely different time period. Does anyone have any idea what could have killed 12 of these ferocious beasts all at once?
MrDBarch 10 months ago
can anyone tell me what they called this carnivor. or is it still unnamed
FWQR3T 10 months ago
can anyone tell me what they called this carnivor.
FWQR3T 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Naughty women in the lane benaughtyman.info
lakseethamalkanthi 1 year ago
so Jurassic park was right
Georgeqaws 1 year ago
Well I don't think it was predator trap or they were washed up but I still don't understand how can it proves that they lived together? When a daddy dies, the rest of the pack also doesn't die at the same time? Don't they move on? How could all of them die together at theh same time?
attractivue 1 year ago
@attractivue Perhaps it's a family that were together when the asteroid hit.
ThaOneChrisJONES 1 year ago
@ThaOneChrisJONES Not really, the asteroid impact (depending how far they were from the ground zero) would have dispersed them and spreaded them far apart from each other.
I think, they might have died due to a disease or something but again not all of them would have caught the disease and died at the same time. Who knows?
attractivue 1 year ago
@attractivue Obviously we can never know for certain what killed them together, but it's not impossible, either. Look up the "Fighting Dinosaurs" fossil. I can name several ideas just off the top of my head: Flash flood drowned them, Forest fire caught them against a cliff, rock slide buried them, One got rabies and killed the others. I'm sure with a bit more time to ponder it I can come up with a bunch more, each as valid as the last because we simply don't know.
turboguppy 10 months ago
Triceratops: oh look it's a T-rex, I might be able to handle him
T-rex: I brought some of my friends :)
Triceratops: FFFUUUUUUUUUU-
ApocDevTeam 1 year ago
@ApocDevTeam Except triceratops probably brought his friends too. RUMBLE!
turboguppy 10 months ago
These guys just recolored and RECYCLED animations of Diplodocus and Allosaurus. Giganotosaurus had very different proportions than Allosaurus, and Argentinosaurus wasn't even related to Diplodocus.
Plus diplodocus was a very slim sauropod, these guys made it all bulky.
susumu07 1 year ago
@susumu07 Haha yes thank you, glad someone else is noticing this.
WaldronicTomotron 1 year ago
@susumu07 Haha yes thank you, glad someone else is noticing this.
WaldronicTomotron 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@susumu07 Haha yeah, thank you, glad someone else is noticing this.
WaldronicTomotron 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@susumu07 Haha yeah, thank you, glad someone else is noticing this.
WaldronicTomotron 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@susumu07 Haha yeah, thank you, glad someone else is noticing this.
WaldronicTomotron 1 year ago
why they used the WWD dinosaurs models?
RaptorSpinoRex1 1 year ago
@RaptorSpinoRex1 Not everyone who makes a documentary has the resources of the BBC.
turboguppy 10 months ago
a giants race in south america!!! you know like an arms race.
dwdrummer9000 1 year ago
It's already insane the carnivores
are huge imagine 12 Tyrannosaurus Rexes
just charging at you and working together XD
fatlips1 1 year ago
5:48 "how large predators behave." What? I love the film just I didn't understand that phrase.
TheLogankahle 1 year ago
@TheLogankahle It means we are changing the way we thought they acted. For example: We thought large meat eating Dinosaurs like T-Rex lived a solitary life ( by themselves ), when they are now discovering things that point to the possibility that they lived in packs. Thus changing the way we thought they behaved.
ThaOneChrisJONES 1 year ago
so... was the second pack found carcharodontosaurus? or mapusaurus?
HanilHeartless 1 year ago
i would of enjoyed more animation in it lol
bluespirtsam 1 year ago
two large meat eating dinosaurs in two parts of the world showing PACKING Behaviour . .
rrevamuntan 1 year ago
the bastards dont know how to stop growing. i love them all!! studying reely hard to become a palaeontologist now
Sl1f3rDrag0n 2 years ago
why were so many paleontologists so sure that big theropod dinosaurs hunted alone? it's not like there was a lot of evidence to support that
carnivores do better in packs than alone
honestly assuming things probably killed more people than can be counted
Koga33525 2 years ago
@Koga33525 Scientists as a whole are a pretty skeptical bunch. You find single skeletons, you use logic--it was alone when it died, it must have been alone when it was alive. This discounts the idea that it WASN'T alone when it died--that is, it was part of a pack and died, then the pack moved on. The reason you discount this idea is because you don't have any evidence that the animal DID hunt in a pack. In science, you must have proof if you want your hypothesis to become a theory.
turboguppy 10 months ago
In other words, lets form a pack and go kill a stupid looking, medium sized argentinosaurus by singleling him out of if pack and perhaps stay together if my friend doesnt bite me.
lebrede 2 years ago
@lebrede I think you're going to find that the "Pack" wasn't anything like a wolf pack, or even a pack of Velociraptors. They were more likely something like a band of crocodiles, sticking together because they had a better chance of getting food if they stayed near each other. Crocodiles have very similar brains to giant therapods of the past, and crocodiles hang out in pretty large groups, often attacking large prey together.
turboguppy 10 months ago
Oh my god, what really surprises me is all those scientists stick to their facts and mix it up with their own feelings, like that lesbian museumcurator or whatever she was. Only two scientists have a passion for animals and for their work. Just like those managers from today, stupid people who never worked hard in their lives. This is what happens if people really work hard, with intellect and passion of course.
lebrede 2 years ago
searching the names of Phil and Rodolfo don't show anything of this huge meat eater. The thing has got to be named by now.
MMan39 2 years ago
Hahah, I like how the actual dinosaur scenes were recoulered images from The Ballad of Big Al. I wonder if the BBc gave them permission for that.
Matkin222 2 years ago
Spinosaurus is the Biggest and Baddest Dino Carnivore? what about this so called Giganotosaurus?
Zhorellski 2 years ago
Spinosaurus is larger than both T-Rex and Giganotosaur, but ate fish like crocodiles (look at a Baryonyx and imagine it with a HUGE sail on the back). Spinosaurus had long hollow teeth so not really strong for big prey like a saurapod. Giganotosaur on the other hand was like a Allosaurus so basically it ate meat and not fish. So technically its the biggest meat eater known present day.
iDumbAzn 2 years ago
@iDumbAzn I think you will find that Fish ARE meat. Spinosaurus may have also preyed on smaller land animals, when opportunity arose, much like crocs do.
turboguppy 10 months ago
So what was the dinosaur that is supposively bigger than Gigonotasaurus called? Because as far as I know, Gigonotasaurus is still the biggest one.
Lazybum450 2 years ago 2
Well, since they mention they´ve discovered a whole pack of them it must be Mapusaurus.
But Mapusaurus is actually smaller than T-Rex, so their estimates in this documentary are probably wrong...
RickRaptor105 2 years ago
The dinosaur mentionned here is mapusaurus.
At some sources it is described as the largest theropod.
But from my point of view T-Rex is the most improssive because of his massive skull which is shorter but thicker than then others.
OrkAllosaurus 2 years ago
I thought they said it was an Albertasaurus...?
iDumbAzn 2 years ago
Awesome vid, I still think of Tyrannosaurus Rex as the king.
That skull is something else. Allosaurs and ceretasaurs had fairly weak skulls. Tyrannosaurs skulls sturdy and thick.
Thulgore 2 years ago 13
@Thulgore
Tarbosaurus had a really cool skull... a lot like T. rex, very massive, but the lower jaw had this crazy locking mechanism that T. rex didn't have. So basically Tarbosaurus could lock its jaws on a prey and NEVER let go until it killed the prey. This was good for attacking the neck of a hadrosaur or a small sauropod.
susumu07 1 year ago
@Thulgore so to you size doesn't matter just small and thickness lol
cjms08 1 year ago
@cjms08 The one they had discoverd wasn't THAT much bigger than T-Rex.
ThaOneChrisJONES 1 year ago
@ThaOneChrisJONES is it a little bigger then a regular size T Rex or sue the biggest T REX they ever found?
cjms08 1 year ago
@cjms08 From the size comparisons I saw between a regular sized T-Rex, it would likely be around the size as Sue.
ThaOneChrisJONES 1 year ago
@Thulgore your an ignorant
thoostorm4 10 months ago
I really like these vidéos! Very interesting!
Denden971 2 years ago 9
its pwnasaurs rex
LOGAN8TOR 2 years ago 2
i heard giglonotasaurus
FreecapZ 2 years ago
those were allosaurus and diplidocus at the end.
spinosaurusXL 2 years ago 3
they r saying...this new theropod is bigger even than giganotosaurus....But they didnt mentioned its name/weight.....Is that discovered completely ?
davesamm 2 years ago
The name os this dino is, as far as my knowledge of contemporary paleontology goes, Mapusaurus roseae.
Rahru 2 years ago
and it is not bigger that giganotosaurus... : /
kanephenom90 2 years ago 2
Yeah, as far as I know, it's not actually bigger. But at least as fucking big as something that could scare the hell out of everyone.
Rahru 2 years ago
yea well u were not the one telling it being bigger mate...it's the vid... It may have been longer though...nyway its massive...
kanephenom90 2 years ago