So if the poster states "facts in the video" but the first text on the screen is a stated opinion, I wonder...... are all troofers not able to differentiate between facts and opinions. Unless you are blatantly lying, I would assume they don't.
This is ridiculous. If you wanted to "inform yourself" you should read and learn about the topic. Instead, you are spreading this speculative, uninformed, ignorant ideas. I recommend doing some serious research before proselytizing. You can start by googling "mit world trade center collapse"
Dimitri Khalezov gives the most rational explanation that remains w/i the laws of physics. Thermite was never a theory until Khalezov published. Even Steven E. Jones' dust data backs the FACT granite bedrock reached a plasma state, aluminasilicate was created, and an elemental correlation is obvious in the dust composition.
Will people stop bitching about the jet fuel not being hot enough to melt steel? It doesnt need to!
At 800C (a temperature which is easily reached by jet fuel) steel rapidly loses its strenght (90% of it) which causes the building to collapse. Also its well possible that there are other hear sources in the building itself that can cause high temps or add to rising temps.
Its written in there... And trying to tell someone to relax is weird, as you can't see the way he acts trough a website.
My point is that people believe the concrete was weakened with explosions to help collapse the building. Because jetfuel wouldn't be able to do that.
Well jet fuel doesn't need to weaken the concrete, just the reinforcementsteel inside it. With such a tall building that will make it collapse. Smaller structures get weakened and could collapse.
As told: reinforced concrete gives way at 700C. So it collapsed. What happened next is the structure on top of the collapsing floor comes down. Now every building as a security strenght built into it. But when gravity excellerates that much mass, that building strenght will not be enough and you'll get collapse after collapse on the levels and that only goes faster.
You can hold a 100 kg on you shoulder. but not if it was falling from 5m above you: *building weight* x 9.8 m/s²
You seriously have no clue about construction do you? A building doesnt abosrb a shock like an organic being, it doest pass the energie on to the spine. For something to fall it must have no resistence. Hey thats ano brainer: the floor underneath gave way. When that happened the floor got crushed with an accelerating speed. That weight then falls sown on the next floor and is NOT absorbed by the entire building. My comparisson with the 100kg was for gravity acceleration.
What are you talking about, the planes flew in at about 3/4th of the lenght. So 1/4th of the building was collapsing down on the remaining structure. And you say there were no upper flores above the crashed floor?
We are either talking sideways of eachother or you just don't get construction logic.
The planes crashed into the 78-84th and 94-98th floor. For a 110 floors counting building, thats several thousands of tons comming down on the structure beneath. No structure would survive.
Brought down in a magical way? You see thats what happenes when people don't understand something, they call it magic. That was going on during the middle ages in Europe. Just because you don't understand how buildings work and have no clue about engineering and construction, doesn't mean this is all magic. Everything checks out and some retard just screamed "inside job, consiracy". And since most people live in a herd mentality, they start yelling it aswell without evidence.
what happens to an egg then you drop it? Its not just the bottom that breaks isn't it? (Yes I know an egg isn't ver strong but when comparing thescale and weight.. it sort of matches) It splashes out. Do people who believe in a conspiracy somehow lack logic thinking?
Tes ive seen buildings fall because of gravity because if a building falls its because of gravity. Same thing anything esle falls back to earth because of gravity. Dont compare a homan body witj a building. But should you do it, then see yourself as the floor beneath the one where the plane crashed into. Not the person above you is crippled by it and cant hold it anymore. So when he gives, YOU will have multiple people falling down on you. Ye cant hold that.
@XxxxExclusivexxxX fact- two jet lines caused three buildings to collapse
fact- no wreckage has been verified as flight 77
fact- the "wreckage" found was ridiculous (i.e. an engine with a diameter of about 3 feet, when the engine from flight 77 was 9 feet in diameter. and there are only pictures of one engine)
want more? and what was the damage that caused the collapse? please say something other than, "a fucking airplane flew into it. duh"
When this video shows the collapse of WTC7, it leaves the first 10 seconds out. The first ten seconds clearly shows the east side of the building collapsing first. After that, the rest of the building falls.
the port authority assured the owner(owners) that there would not be enough surrounding space to ensure a safe demolition that wouldn't jeopardize surrounding properties.
hand in hand we go
is this too convenient?
insurance policies on these buildings? yes. "in case of a terrost attack(like the one in 19-- )?
3) the plane that hit the pentagon had a rather small weight in comparison to the pentagon which standing at many thousands of tonnes was the equivilant of you crashing your car into a brick wall at 40mph, your car wouldnt rip through it like butter it would be crushed and you badly injured, the same applies for the plane,
you know what just look at some vids, i cant be assed to comment 1000 pages of evidence.
@mrh112 Actually this is a wrong comparison, let’s say your car going, not through a brick wall, but a series of cement column rising from the ground spaced about 3 feet apart. Let’s also say you are going 500 miles/hr and accelerating. Now going through the columns at that speed ,your car and everything inside will be shredded and torn apart. It will go through many of the columns.
I used to beleive this was terrorists... then the government... now terrorists again!
Im sorry but after looking and actually listening to factual evidence this consperacy stuff crumbles: 1) the twin towers did not fall vertically, they collapsed slightly sideways covering about 100m of area with debris,
2) WTC7 had a huge fuel tank for its backup generator (being government) and as this burned at a few thousand degrees the floor gave out leading to the center collapse,
how about we all agree that we wish the people who did lost there lifes on 9/11 will rest in peace, instead of all this argumentation, nothing is going to change even if it was a inside job, you aint getting the people who lost their lifes and the buildings back so lets just always remember what happen on 9/11/01
@JakeFC17 we should remember 9-11 i agree but we should also bring the people responsible to justice for the victims of 9-11 . and in my opinion the victim count far exceeds the thousands lost on that day you need to count all the people killed in the name of the false war on terror . unless and until the people of America wake up to what really happened and why there will never be justice for any of the victims of these atrocities
@akbdj yeah i know i agree but what im saying is that this whole thing is causing a lot of drama people should just go our seperate ways and believe what they believe instead of fighting each other over you know? and i totally believe it was an inside job im actually only 17 and i been studing everything about 9/11 even back in 1993 the wtc bombing and yes we should bring the people repossible to justice but it will never happen because the goverment will keep telling us lies sadly just like
@akbdj when Nixon was president there was about 15 mins cut out of the president phone call tapes(i use that as an example of the government trying to cover there tracks just like they did with 9/11), the government will never admit it was an inside job and they will never let us know but yes all of us should fight for justice but im saying people shouldn't fight each other over different beliefs
building 7 was not a controlled demolition. fires started at 9:30 because of the south tower plane crash (debris and jet fuel had reached wtc 7) the fires lasted 8 hours until the collapse at 5:30. when the north tower collapsed, it damaged and scooped out a chunk of the southern part of the building and destroyed 1 of the 3 major trusses of the building. the fires were fed by diesel fuel (back up generators)
you are terribly wrong. The buildings collapsed sideways because many stories fall onto them and the gravity exerts the floors. the 'blasts' occur because the air, dust and debris need an exit point during the collapse where all the air is being pushed out. black smoke indicates burning plastic and jet fuel. not a cool fire. the steel did not melt. the molten metal underground occurred because of the intense fire following the collapse. the core did survive, but fell down because it was unstable
neocon politicians ( pnac ) responsible for 911. alot are neocon zionists that only care about israel. gov fairytale is a farce. bankers? r after world domination. 5 countries left if u count libya. take these few remaing countries out and she`s rdif chips for us all. neocons went to china / russia about usa attacking iran and were laughed at thank god. get these pricks out of usa gov.
Does it even matter whether you're right or wrong? All your doing is beating an already dead horse on an issue thats lasted almost a decade, and something that happened almost ten years ago. We are at war, no matter how much you kick and scream and bite and say "the government was in on it", I stand true. Rather that i carry an ideal that is fought for by thousands, than one that is whispered by only hundreds. We may be winning this war, but the fact is, we are still not done.
@colonelchris92 does it even matter ? you make me sick you ignorant shit over 900,000 people have died because of these attacks and what about in a few more years when "another attack" on the us leads us to another war ? your stupid ass is going to say "Does it even matter whether you're right or wrong?" just like the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, and 9/11. Like wise men have said before if you have nothing important to say shut the fuck up.
@L4R3T4 Dude... I don't know why you're gettin your panties all up in a wad... All i'm saying is that trying to justify or unjustify what has already happened, is taking away efforts to try and end the war with our side winning in totallity. I'm saying that just by arguing over this right now, we are wasting effort that we can channel to try and support the troops, so they can come home, and not have to worry about fighting over this day in, and day out.
the explanation of why conspiracy theories are accepted is very similar to the explanation of why people reject climate change and evolution: a mistaken and hubristic belief that a lone blogger (or a small network of bloggers) can do better at explaining events than thousands of well-qualified experts. you fail.
We are in this video, claiming (Thermite) was used, yet still claim low temperatures at the same time. Thermite, lowest temperature, 1660 Degrees. Once Thermite catches anything else on fire, it can easily get up to Temperatures over 2500 degrees. These temperatures are also hot enough to melt (Unprotected) steel.
Yet the claim is still, no temperatures hot enough to melt steel, while claiming Thermite was used?
What those firefighters heard was the floors of the building hitting the floors below them. The cores were not "indestructible." They did remained standing in both buildings for several seconds before they collapsed. If explosives were used in building 7, a series of extremely loud bangs would have been clearly recorded on all cameras present immediately prior to the collapse. Building 7 collapsed without any explosions at all.
The info on the REAL criminals is avaiable. Obamas a puppet. Most people are too lazy to find out but You Tube could really help ! All those interested in real freedom should watch
Those small 'explosions' were just compressed air blowing out the windows as it collapsed. And why would you need to use explosives when you had just flown a plane into the WTC. Come on you conspiracy nuts... Shut the fuck up.
@ 0:51 what "smoke" doesnt melt steel? COMMON SENSE yords. shoult it be fire doesnt melt steel? of course, even though its the internet, it doesn't tell the truth... btw, those blasts stuff there are just implosions caused by the raging collapse... thanbks anyway for the facts! =)
i suggest the next time a skyscraper is to come down, lets send a plane into it. maybe add abunch of extra fuel. leave your dirty socks in it etc. it wont come down.
What is the obsession with the steel 'needing' to melt? If you heat steel up to 400 degrees Celcius you can bend the stuff with your hands. The steel did NOT need to melt for the buildings to collapse.
@mjwible27 No the plane by itself had nowhere near enough energy to bring down the building by itself. However the the energy it did have was enough to blow of fire retardant foam from the steel support columns. This coupled with a huge fire which was enough to heat the steel into a non ridgid form which eventually could not provide any structural support. This bought a rather sizable chunk of steel and concrete onto the floor below causing a pancake effect collapse.
@Stain92able so, the 1st time in HISTORY that has ever happened, when all the facts go against that, bombs were used my friend, thermite was used, that's the bottom line, inside job.
@mjwible27 Okay, I can see any sensible valid point I chose to make in aid of helping you how it is completely possible and undoubtably the case that caused the buildings to come down is a lost cause. All I can honestly say to you is you're wrong.
@Stain92able so, even the last man out, who said" about 6 to 8 seconds before the plane hit up above, felt and heard the loudest explosion from the lower level, helped a man out who's skin was all burnt off, from the lower level, that by it's self is all the evidence I need. I served my country my friend. I was in the Army and I'm telling you that you are 100% wrong.
@rbarkleycf3 Rofl you're a moron. You have been around them all your life. You ever taken down a 120 story building? Oh. You haven't. I'm sorry you don't destroy buildings you just work with explosives to blow up certain smaller devices and disabling them. Fire weakens the steel and the sheer force of 400 mph causes everything above it to be weakened. When that comes falling down onto the rest of the tower with even more force then a collapse is inevitable.
@SuperSirius11 So, explain the thermite then? Explain the proof they found it there???? Explain how a few fires took down WTC 7?? I guess you sneezed on that one and it fell it's self huh???
@mjwible27 Thermite is what sparkelrs are made of. So called super thermite would have given off much more sparks. Why are there no sparks or flashes of light for explosive charges in the collapsing buildings. The blowouts are from air between each floor being pressurised by the pancaking of floor after floor in the collapse. Learn about impact loading. If you look at objects that are no longer attached to 1 and 2 at all, you will see what the free fall speed actually is compared to 1-2 falls.
@mjwible27 You were clearly FAR away from Manhattan on September the 11th 2001 because the WTC 7 was burning on nearly every floor, plus there was a lot of structural damage caused by the collapse of 1 and 2 tower. Further more, natural gas lines fueled the fires in building 7, which burn uncontrollably for over 6 hours. Oh and there was NO thermite found, only chemicals in the dust consistant with rust deposits throught the buildings structure.
@NowKillYourself actually no I was just across the way in New Jersey, but yeah good points and all, but how come other buildings have burned for more the 20 HOURS and never fell?? Only this one, the 1st in the history of our time, but good points and thanks for pointing that out for me.
@NowKillYourself oh yeah forgot, explain how BBC said building 7 came down 30 mins before it actually happened??? And that was on LIVE T.V, you can find that on youtube, look for yourself, explain that one too.
@mjwible27 Alright, so now you claim that the "British Broadcasting Corporation" had prior knowledge of this supposed "inside job" by the U.S. Government, to the point where they KNEW that WTC 7 was going to be demolished 30 minutes before it happened? LOL! I hope you realize that WTC 7 had been burning for nearly 7 hours that day and pretty much everyone in New York City (especially the media) knew #7's collapse was inevitable. The FDNY made no effort to stop the fires and it was badly damaged.
@mjwible27 I watched the video and there is no mention of the time in which he reported the building collapsed. They used words like "apparently" - "it's been reported" and "we're hearing". But, for the sake of argument lets say they DID actually report the collapse prior the it actually happen, whether they predicted the collapse or they had knowledge of some kinda "controlled demolition". Tell me, HOW does this 'prove' that 9/11 was in fact an INSIDE JOB? Why would BBC know about a US "job"?
@NowKillYourself Pentagon, main example... No aircraft can get in to it's airspace with out being shot down by it defense systems, but yet 1 plane did. NORAD, with in minutes any plane that is off course is supposed to scramble fighter jets to see why it is off course, planes that day where off course for over an hour of total time. Look at the Empire state building, that was hit by a c-130 before, never fail. Look at all the buildings that have burned for more then 15 hours, never fail .
@mjwible27 Not true. I have family who live out in DC and there are commercial jets flying with striking radius of the pentagon ALL THE TIME. You really need to look into your sources here because it was a B-25 Mitchell that hit the Empire State Building NOT a C-130. In fact, the C-130 wasn't created until 9 years after the Empire State Building was struck by the b-25 in 1945. Also, the Empire State is a concrete reinforced structure, the WTC was NOT. You're either lying or misguided.
@NowKillYourself are you sure??? I was in the Military and I understand and know some of the technology they have. Do you honestly think and believe they don't have things that are 20 to 30 years more advanced then what they let the public know??? Come on man, you really have no idea.. Ok, my fault about that, but you are right it was a b-25, but look at the hole in left, fire damage and speed, it wasn't as big or as fast, but it did enough damage and looked a lot like the twin towers accident
@NowKillYourself and the Twin towers were built to with stand impacts from air planes. All skyscrapers are, like hey lets make this building that are so tall and luxurious, and not prepare for any thing like planes crashing in to them. To many signs point to our government knowing about it before it happened, it's sad to say this and I SERVED in the U.S Army.... and Sir, I do not lie about anything, it's just plain stupid to lie or make things up.
@NowKillYourself watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60&NR=1... and another, how come Bush's story changed a few times about when he 1st fond out???I mean really, I can tell you too this day exactly where I was, what I was doing and if you ask me again 5 years from now, the story will be the SAME every single time. I just got to my doctors apt in Cherry Hill and walked in the office and seen the 1st tower had been hit, then shortly after the 2nd tower was struck my appointment was at 9am. I can tell you in DETAIL
@mjwible27 So you think George W Bush is behind the September 11th terrorist attacks on the United States responsible for killing 3,000 Americans, and NOT Al-Qaeda? You think the families of the 19 hijackers were lying? Al-Qaeda was lying? Thousands of pounds of explosives were snuck into the WTC prior to the attacks without a single soul noticing..? All the planning, effort and shear man hours needed to pull of such trickery and not a single person has blown the whistle? I mean really?!
@NowKillYourself Honestly, I don't know what to believe man... I've watched so many video's, have done so much research and it just doesn't add up. This one video I see, just before the 1st plane hit, a camera was on the ground, and there was an explosion just seconds before the plane hit, how does anyone explain that? What the Last Man Out as well, something is very fishy with all of it. Did anyone ever blow the whistle on JKF??
@NowKillYourself And understand this, if the powers behind everything not only threaten your life, but your WHOLE FAMILY, from parents, to cousins all the way down the line, would you keep your mouth shut? I know I would. How come a lot of KEY WITNESS'S where killed off as well? You seem like a smart person, really look behind all the bullshit and really dig in to it.
@mjwible27 Key witnesses killed? When did this happen? There were over 100 witnesses that saw a commercial jet strike the Pentagon on 9.11. I haven't heard of any of them being murdered or killed. Second: If the Government or people behind this were trying to keep the inside job a secret, then why didn't they kill the two little dipshits that made that "Loose Change" documentary? Or why didn't they at least threaten them to stop? Instead, they came out with three more editions.
@NowKillYourself You haven't done enough research then, do some more digging man and you'll understand better. I look at things from my own point of view. I served in the Army, I know FULLY what the military is capable of doing and handling, you have not the slightest clue on the technology they have. 9/11 could have been prevented, that sir is a fact. Now I fully think the government knew of this, it's called false flag operations, why did we go in to Iraq????? It's all a fucked up mind game
@NowKillYourself watch?v=iU8aqx_PxnM... another.......watch?v=bvay28lZiHU..... and the video of people who die or committed suicide..... check em out man
@mjwible27 How many people do you think it would take to pull of a massive conspiracy like this? Think: The mastermind behind this "inside job" would need the following: intelligence agents, a large and skilled demolition crew with tons of explosives, nineteen Middle Eastern men willing to throw their lives away for the US Government, hundreds of false witnesses, a decent size security team, false investigators (pretty much the entire NIST, FEMA and ASoCE) along with lots and LOTS of money.
@NowKillYourself you should watch the interview done by Alex Jones to Aaron Russo, even he tells his side of the story, it's pretty interesting. Also, how did the JFK,MLK, RFK jobs all get covered up??? This government has lied to us so many times before and they will keep lying. Watch The Last Man out, open your eyes up man, everything on youtube.
@mjwible27 Sure I believe the Government has secrets and they have lied in the past, especially about the WMD's in Iraq. But I truly do not believe the Government was behind the September 11th attacks. I believe and pretty much know it was an attack on the U.S. by Islamic extremists. Contrary to popular belief, those "Arabs in the desert" are not just a bunch of Camel Jockies. A lot of them are highly educated, tech suave and more than capable of pulling off such coordinated attacks as 9/11.
@mjwible27 Yes, I use to believe the conspiracy theories. I don't anymore. I have done plenty of research, looked at both sides of the argument and came to my own conclusion. There are lots of deceptive points of information. If you had an open mind and looked at everything subjectively, you would see. I believe the whole reason behind this conspiracy theory is simple: We like to believe that only Americans are capable of such sophisticated attacks. That no enemy is THAT intelligent. Wrong.
@NowKillYourself well, I respect the way you came at me from the start, in a calm and intelligent way, but I don't believe a man in a cave half way around the world planed and carried out one of the most tragic attacks in American history, and I do not believe that our government had no prior knowledge of it, epically after watch that Aaron Russo interview. We went to war with Afghanistan, then magically ended up in Iraq.
@NowKillYourself I served my time for this country and I seen some pretty amazing things, then seen some horrible things. If they could cover up the JFK assassination, don't you think there's other things they could pull off?I'm not trying to make you believe what I do, just pointing out some very good video's and interviews. So, it was nice having a little debate with you about it and I respect that you do not believe what I do, so take care now and God bless you.
@NowKillYourself I do have one last question for you though, when the 2nd plane hit, can you explain to me what was under the plane the object that is not found on ANY commercial plane, but was on that plane that day??
@mjwible27 It was hard to tell because the plane was coming in at over 500mph and I caught maybe the last two or three seconds before it struck the WTC. From my memory, it look just like a jetliner, there was nothing on the bottom. Photographic and video evidence proves it was in fact flight 175. DNA recovery from remains of the passengers on board as well as pieces of the aircraft were found around Ground Zero. I looked at photos after and it all looked like was glare from the sun.
@NowKillYourself they have still pictures of that plane and there is defiantly something under the belly of the plane, which is seen on Air force planes. Many people have said there is something under it as well, you can find that out for yourself. Some people even said the plane had no windows on it, that is another red flag for me too. Didn't you like how they found the passport of one of the hijackers that feel from the WTC, don't know that was possible, but they did.
@mjwible27 HMM I guess you're right then! Call up the Supreme Court, the highest prosecuting attorney you know! It was all an Inside Job because there is definitely something on the bottom of that fucking plane! Argh! Hahahahaa. Don't you think the idea that there was an elaborate plot to convince people that the Pentagon was hit by American Airlines 77 by NOT hitting it with American Airlines 77, or American Airlines 175 into the WTC, is well... Just grotesquely stupid?
@NowKillYourself In his book "The 9/11 Commission Report-Omissions and Distortions", for instance, David Ray Griffin tells us that the hijacker identifications have been "shown to be incorrect".
Karen Kwiatkowski, in Griffin and Peter Dale Scott's "9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out", reports that "several of the purported hijackers were found to be alive".
Jay Kolar, in Paul Zarembka's "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001" states definitively that
10 of those named by the FBI have since turned out to be alive, documented as such by authorities and interviews with those named". And Nafeez Ahmed appears sufficiently convinced by Kolar and perhaps others to say that "It is now known that at least 10 of the 19 alleged hijackers are alive according to multiple, credible news accounts by the BBC, CNN, the Telegraph, the Independent, and other international media
@NowKillYourself I guess this site I pulled that off is grotesquely wrong as well huh??? I'm not doing this anymore, you can think what you want. I know what's real and want's not. I pay attention do serious DETAIL, I was trained too... You take care of yourself now and there was in fact something on the BELLY OF THAT PLANE, THAT IS A FACT... Goodbye now
@NowKillYourself they all seen a plane, but was not flight 77, it a drone used by the U.S Military, boy you don't give and you clearly have not done your research. NO PLANE THAT IS NOT MILITARY CAN NOT FLY IN TO PENTAGON AIR SPACE, THIS IS A FACT.... Do your research hommie
@NowKillYourself then show me video or image of BLD 7 burning so out of control the the it fell in to it's own footprint, then I'll show you video and image and other buildings burning for over 20 hours and the STEEL FRAME was there after the fire destroyed it. Explain the object under the 2nd plane to hit the tower, guess the hijackers hand time to land the plane, put something under it. I'll show you image and video of that as well, an object under that plane, that DOES NOT ?BELONG
@mjwible27 So where did all the debris from the airplane come from? Oh and the human remains along with DNA evidence of all but one passenger (an infant) from flight 77..? You give me one witness that sees a plane flying away from the Pentagon, and that's supposed to do what? Discredit the 136 people who saw flight 77 hit the Pentagon?
@NowKillYourself dude, most people ran for cover or hid when the explosion went off. Just by the statements given by those key witness of the flight path not corresponding with the official story should make you question it. I believe it was a type of military drone that hit the pentagon, and the real plane was used as a pawn. Look up operations northwoods as well. I don't want to give my opinion on where the DNA came from and how they did it, but the official story was a lie upon many lies
@NowKillYourself I know deep down inside you have a little doubt, you have to question it, just like myself, a small piece of me wants to believe the government, but I can't. We went to war with Iraq over LIES, many of our troops and good friends of mine, died there. How about all the innocent Iraq people who have died? Who has benefited from this war?? It's one big HOAX man, the truth will come out some day, maybe not in our life time, but it will
I also talked to someone one on one, (LIVE) face to face, who saw one of those... in the Wreckage in PA.
You people seem to just (Intentionally) skip the fact, crashes like these, had never been done before in aviation history. It was impossible to know prier, whether or not those (Flight Recorders) could even withstand such HARSH crashes.
Probably not, if they'd put it to the test... but there wasn't reason to..
@mjwible27 The only black boxes that were not recovered are the ones from Flight 11 and 175. Which is understandable because they hit a 110 story building which came crashing down with energy great enough to be clearly read on a Richter magnitude scale. Have you done any of the research on this? Do you know about the United 93 mayday calls? Or Mohamed Atta's passenger addresses, recorded by Boston ARTCC? Also search: Betty Ong on Youtube. Tell me how these were faked please.
@NowKillYourself hahahahahah, man you believe everything they tell you. It was allllllllllll faked man, jesus dude, you believe everything they tell you, that shit was all staged. The plane she was on, had no phones in it, cute right. Oh you mean the guys passport they found outside the WTC that some made it through the huge fire ball explosion. The hijackers are still a live man, well 7 of them or so
@NowKillYourself 9/11 Truth ~ Hollywood Speaks Out - Full Movie , check that out on youtube, again many KEY EYE WITNESSES. Fireman who heard bombs going off, Willie Rodriguez who heard a bomb go off in the sub levels on the WTC a few seconds before the plane hit, but yet his testimony was never used in the 9/11 commission
Project Achilles, proves phone calls could not be made from any cell phones, most of the planes HAD NO AIR PHONES. To fake a persons voice, go on prankdial com, they voice changing technology on there, not imagine what the government has? 30 to 50 years a head of what we know, that is a fact
@NowKillYourself Dick Cheney gave a stand down order to NORAD on 9/11.Norman Minetta testified under oath that Cheney gave the order & no one did nothing about it. Explain this one???? I have so much evidence and things that can clearly prove that 9/11 was an inside job man, just come out of the dark side and in to the light were you belong
@mjwible27 # Also people, google (Bill Clinton downsizing the military) Chaney's hands were unfortunately tied, do to (Bill Clinton's) budget cuts. Fieve. FievelJ69 1 hour ago Reply * Share * Remove * Flag for spam * Block User * Unblock User # @19garza74 There's also documented evidence, as to the *Real* reason Chaney told NORAD to stand down. Mostly, because they realized, by the time any plane got there, it would also be (TOO LATE, TO PREVENT ANYTHING!) Fieve.
@TheDeparted112570 ok pal, cute comment but that wont fly this one idiot. I'm sure you believe the Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK by himself too, right?? Now run a long Forest Gump and I made all the post and comments here.
@mjwible27 no i dnot not believe that any more than i believe this harp bullshit haha. The alleged dangers of HAARP were dramatized in popular culture by Marvel Comics, author Tom Clancy, and The X-Files. haha COMIC BOOKS HAHA
@TheDeparted112570 HAARP caused the Japan and Haiti earthquakes. I don't know enough about the Titanic to say anything intelligent about it. You can draw a direct correlation to HAARP activity on those days to the earthquakes. Science. 911 was an inside job also. Science.
@Daddyo930 The alleged dangers of HAARP were dramatized in popular culture by Marvel Comics, author Tom Clancy, and The X-Files. COMIC BOOKS BWAHAHAHAHA!!! you people are seriously delusional!!!!!
@TheDeparted112570 So you mean that the government website (haarpalaskaedu / haarp / datal) is a hoax? Sound waves can break glass and kill. If that's possible then by simple extrapolation, we can then say that sound waves can cause an earthquake. Delusional? No. Science fact.
@Daddyo930 haha sciance my ass. i will sonner believe in the tooth fairy and santa claus. lmfao you have watched too many x-files episodes!!! haarp is a conspiracy magnet to the scientifically uninformed =)
@mjwible27 Ever seen the movie the matrix? Some people think this grotesque reality is so sweet that they will kill you if you try and unplug them. Especially the billionaires. The one thing that bothers me about the debunkers is are they really that willfully blind and ignorant or are they just one more stupid, lazy, complacent american who does not care because the truth would inconvenience them?
@mjwible27 That's simply NOT true, proof: watch?v=_xjBbqRJT7Q - In reality you can't just scramble some fighter jets from anywhere in the nation and intercept a commercial airliner within moments notice, especially if those commercial jets turned off their transponders. They become a needle in a haystack. Also: If you have "so much evidence" then why don't you forward it to the district attorney? I'm sure they'd love to see it for a possible criminal indictment.
@NowKillYourself you can look at the video's I've uploaded now, that's enough proof for me. People have tried to bring George W. to trial, they say it's a matter of national security and that's their excuse. watch?v=iU8aqx_PxnM&list=PL831178B1A7E4A158 he's a former pentagon employee, guess she's lying too,right???
@mjwible27 What State and County do you live in? I'll find your District Attorney, I will even give you the mailing address and fax number to his/her office. I want you to forward all the evidence you have on your theory of a criminal element within the U.S.A. being involved in the 9-11 Terrorist Attacks. Why not be the first one to bring JUSTICE to the "real" criminals? You will be a hero! Think about it! Just let me know when you're ready and I'll get the information for you.
@NowKillYourself because I'm a nobody man, you have movie stars, other politicians that are fighting this cause right now and trying to bring justice and truth from all of this. I'm just sharing what I know on youtube and getting the truth out there, opening up more eyes with facts from key eye witnesses and spreading it like a virus. It's ok man, if you have doubts now, don't be afraid, now you have seen the truth, it's up to you to share it with others
@mjwible27 Tax cab driver Lloyde England spilled the beans on the pentagon attack, now there's ALL the proof in the world that 9/11 was an inside job!
@NowKillYourself [continued] Further more, the max take-off weight of a B-25 Mitchell is 41,800 lb while the weight of a fully loaded Boeing 767-200ER (and it was fully loaded with jet fuel on 9/11) is 395,000 lb.. The max speed of the B-25 was 275mph while the 767 that hit the South Tower was clocked at over 500mph just before impact. That is WAY more energy being driven into a structure without a concrete reinforced core like the WTC, as opposed to the B-25 incident with the Empire State B.
@mjwible27 Yes. Because we ALL KNOW that that man was paying attention to the 400 mph plane 6 - 8 seconds before it hit. Oh wait. It's too far away and by the time he realized what he heard the plane hit seconds after.
Every part of this video has been completely debunked, nice try but bring real scientific evidence. and these truther websites cant be considered "credible" when they throw lies left and right, find actual evidence for this twoofer crap
@enclavebrandon3 i dont have the time to waste my time debunking every theory brought up by some idiot who thinks im on government payroll to debunk theories. if you want proof, watch "Screw Loose Change" on youtube(the whole thing, watch "loose change" get entirely debunked) and RKOwens4's videos, both of whom use credible evidence and undeniable proof straight from the experts, not from websites like twoofers with exxagerated claims, left off quotes, and confused witnesses as "evidence"
@iNigga4 Then i can say watch videos on how its impossible by phyisics that a building not hit by a plane can free fall. Theres engineers and aritechs who say how its impossible for a jet to take down the towers.
@enclavebrandon3 then i can say how you obviously never timed the collapses for yourself. south tower is 14-16 seconds while the north tower is about 22, no 9 second free-fall. not to mention theres the huge majority of engineers and architects who do agree a FUCKING 80 TON JET AIRLINER with thousands of gallons of jet fuel which can burn at temperatures that can weaken steel well beyond 50% along with approxamitely 25%+ of supports being severed/seriously damaged. Not enough?
@iNigga4 Fire cant burn steel -_- heres a test of thermite being used /watch?v=uPpvbb5XgLU also when if your statement is true why did a building in cina burn for hours with no collapse? it the statement proves that fire can not burn steel. Also i call bullshit on your statement of people who agree that some how jet fuel can burn down a building, also if your statement about it being seriously demaged then why did it all collapse why not just above it why the whole thing?
@enclavebrandon3 fire can weaken steel, especially the 1800 Farenheit fires burning at the WTC, where more than 50% of steels strength lost with support having already been destroyed, the buildings couldnt have held themself up any longer, so when the breaking point of 1 truss snapped it crushed on another and another until it reached the ground, while the "indestructable" core as this moron calls it stood for a few seconds after before collapsing as it had been badly damaged by collapse.
@iNigga4 Sigh i feel like if we keep fighting we will get no ware lets just agree to disagree. But still the fire once agian was not hot enough to burn steel unless there was nano-thermite. Before september 11 why was there lots of painting and construction going on around the wtc? Or why did other nations tell bush there was going to be a attack on america. heres a bigger question why was 2.3 trillon dollars missing from the pentagon on september 10 2001, And then the next day it was attacked?
So if the poster states "facts in the video" but the first text on the screen is a stated opinion, I wonder...... are all troofers not able to differentiate between facts and opinions. Unless you are blatantly lying, I would assume they don't.
ExposeTheTwooferCult 1 week ago
This is ridiculous. If you wanted to "inform yourself" you should read and learn about the topic. Instead, you are spreading this speculative, uninformed, ignorant ideas. I recommend doing some serious research before proselytizing. You can start by googling "mit world trade center collapse"
variztia 3 weeks ago
Dimitri Khalezov gives the most rational explanation that remains w/i the laws of physics. Thermite was never a theory until Khalezov published. Even Steven E. Jones' dust data backs the FACT granite bedrock reached a plasma state, aluminasilicate was created, and an elemental correlation is obvious in the dust composition.
cheerdiver 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was an inside job. Plane and Simple.
bmw200000 2 months ago
Will people stop bitching about the jet fuel not being hot enough to melt steel? It doesnt need to!
At 800C (a temperature which is easily reached by jet fuel) steel rapidly loses its strenght (90% of it) which causes the building to collapse. Also its well possible that there are other hear sources in the building itself that can cause high temps or add to rising temps.
EliteGhost001 2 months ago
@EliteGhost001
whats your point. Buildings burn like 48 hours and still remanin.
Trying to get hired as a shill?
Relax son.
xNAJAFx 1 month ago
@xNAJAFx
You don't get my point?
Its written in there... And trying to tell someone to relax is weird, as you can't see the way he acts trough a website.
My point is that people believe the concrete was weakened with explosions to help collapse the building. Because jetfuel wouldn't be able to do that.
Well jet fuel doesn't need to weaken the concrete, just the reinforcementsteel inside it. With such a tall building that will make it collapse. Smaller structures get weakened and could collapse.
EliteGhost001 1 month ago
@EliteGhost001
thousands of welded beems need to give way simultaneously for a floor
to drop symmetric, as it did. Clap your hands 110 times in 14 seconds brah.
Thats how fast it went. These are well coordinated explosions.
Jetfuel and "planecrash" has nothing to do with it.
xNAJAFx 1 month ago
@xNAJAFx
As told: reinforced concrete gives way at 700C. So it collapsed. What happened next is the structure on top of the collapsing floor comes down. Now every building as a security strenght built into it. But when gravity excellerates that much mass, that building strenght will not be enough and you'll get collapse after collapse on the levels and that only goes faster.
You can hold a 100 kg on you shoulder. but not if it was falling from 5m above you: *building weight* x 9.8 m/s²
EliteGhost001 1 month ago
@EliteGhost001
youre talkin bout a "piledriver" wich there was none. even if there was, it
wouldnt make any diffrence. the floors above impact were pulverised. there is no
force pushing the floors down. you can see 20 floors below the collapse explosions going off.
xNAJAFx 1 month ago
@xNAJAFx
There is indeed no force pushing it down but there is 1 pulling it down: gravity.
The "explosions" are simply cause by air pressure.
I don't know where Americans got the love for self-destruction and inside-job theories from but this goes too far.
EliteGhost001 1 month ago
@EliteGhost001
dropping an apple is gravity, for it to come down requires absence of recistance.
have you seen buildings drop due to gravity brah?
even if in theory the section of impact vanished, would you think there is enough
weight for the top block of the building to crush down the ca 80 floors below ?
would you belive they construct scyscrapers with the same weight all the way up ?
if your neck suddanly vanished, would your head pull down your body ?
xNAJAFx 1 month ago
@xNAJAFx
You seriously have no clue about construction do you? A building doesnt abosrb a shock like an organic being, it doest pass the energie on to the spine. For something to fall it must have no resistence. Hey thats ano brainer: the floor underneath gave way. When that happened the floor got crushed with an accelerating speed. That weight then falls sown on the next floor and is NOT absorbed by the entire building. My comparisson with the 100kg was for gravity acceleration.
EliteGhost001 1 month ago
@EliteGhost001
if a floor is crushed by any reason, what weight crushes the floor benath?
xNAJAFx 1 month ago
@xNAJAFx
Already told you: the weigt of the floor above it multiplied by the acceleration of gravity.
so *weigt of top structure* x 9.81.
And that gravity acceleration of devastating
EliteGhost001 1 month ago
@EliteGhost001
what floor above?
the whole top section above impact was pulverised. (south tower) the top section
actually tiped over and pulveriesd before reaching half way down.Rest of the tower
in some magical way was braught down in a straight symmetric fashion.
there are no floors piled up as a result of a pancake thoeory that you somehow argue for.
xNAJAFx 1 month ago
@xNAJAFx
What are you talking about, the planes flew in at about 3/4th of the lenght. So 1/4th of the building was collapsing down on the remaining structure. And you say there were no upper flores above the crashed floor?
We are either talking sideways of eachother or you just don't get construction logic.
The planes crashed into the 78-84th and 94-98th floor. For a 110 floors counting building, thats several thousands of tons comming down on the structure beneath. No structure would survive.
EliteGhost001 1 month ago
@EliteGhost001
Would you agree that the part of the south tower, above impact, tipped over ?
Would you agree that it disintigrated ? And when ?
And if it tipped over, what force "crushes" the floors beenath ?
Are you claming the top blocks of the towers braught the rest down ?
You somehow refer to a pancaketheory. Result of that would show floors piled up
when the smoke and the dust abate.
xNAJAFx 1 month ago
@xNAJAFx
Brought down in a magical way? You see thats what happenes when people don't understand something, they call it magic. That was going on during the middle ages in Europe. Just because you don't understand how buildings work and have no clue about engineering and construction, doesn't mean this is all magic. Everything checks out and some retard just screamed "inside job, consiracy". And since most people live in a herd mentality, they start yelling it aswell without evidence.
EliteGhost001 1 month ago
@EliteGhost001
If the top section of the south tower is the piledriver that crushes the
rest of the building, how come its not intact when it reaches the bottom?
Pancaketheroy? Crushed floors ? How do they combine?
xNAJAFx 1 month ago
@xNAJAFx
what happens to an egg then you drop it? Its not just the bottom that breaks isn't it? (Yes I know an egg isn't ver strong but when comparing thescale and weight.. it sort of matches) It splashes out. Do people who believe in a conspiracy somehow lack logic thinking?
EliteGhost001 1 month ago
@EliteGhost001
i think its an excellent comparison.
again, no resistance dropping an egg.
how about 10 eggs piled up in a tube..
pick one brother. good luck.
xNAJAFx 1 month ago
@xNAJAFx
stack a bunch of eggs on top of eachother, take out 2
the remaining eggs op top will fall down and crunch the other eggs. Only to smack themselves on the ground.
Seriously, why is it so hard for you to understand?
EliteGhost001 1 month ago
@EliteGhost001
you said earlyer that the impact was ca 8 floors, let say 10. thats 10 %
push out the 4th egg from top and see the result.
good luck
xNAJAFx 1 month ago
@xNAJAFx
Tes ive seen buildings fall because of gravity because if a building falls its because of gravity. Same thing anything esle falls back to earth because of gravity. Dont compare a homan body witj a building. But should you do it, then see yourself as the floor beneath the one where the plane crashed into. Not the person above you is crippled by it and cant hold it anymore. So when he gives, YOU will have multiple people falling down on you. Ye cant hold that.
EliteGhost001 1 month ago
@xNAJAFx
And damn I hate typing from my phone
EliteGhost001 1 month ago
@xNAJAFx
Now stop trying to argue over things youdont understand.
EliteGhost001 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
12weasel100 2 months ago
its now 2011, if you still think that this was an inside job your a moron
XxxxExclusivexxxX 3 months ago
@XxxxExclusivexxxX >your
kihhn 3 months ago
@kihhn considering everything that supports your argument is based on theory. i think i would disagree with you
XxxxExclusivexxxX 3 months ago
@XxxxExclusivexxxX well considering the official story is not based on fact, i think i will disagree with you
kihhn 3 months ago
@kihhn fact- two jet liners hit the world trade center
fact- the damage caused by the jet liners caused these two buildings to collapse.
fact- the pentagon was hit by a plane not a missle. actual parts of the plane were found
XxxxExclusivexxxX 3 months ago
@XxxxExclusivexxxX fact- two jet lines caused three buildings to collapse
fact- no wreckage has been verified as flight 77
fact- the "wreckage" found was ridiculous (i.e. an engine with a diameter of about 3 feet, when the engine from flight 77 was 9 feet in diameter. and there are only pictures of one engine)
want more? and what was the damage that caused the collapse? please say something other than, "a fucking airplane flew into it. duh"
kihhn 3 months ago
Small scale nukes; see the blog 'anonymous physicist' for more.
signalfire6 3 months ago
turn this music off u dick sucker.
TjR3O3 4 months ago
When this video shows the collapse of WTC7, it leaves the first 10 seconds out. The first ten seconds clearly shows the east side of the building collapsing first. After that, the rest of the building falls.
Crede06 4 months ago
34 people are still in denial.....
midnitespider 4 months ago
@midnitespider LOLOLOL
MtthwSmmns 3 months ago
the buildings were too expensive to keep.
the port authority assured the owner(owners) that there would not be enough surrounding space to ensure a safe demolition that wouldn't jeopardize surrounding properties.
hand in hand we go
is this too convenient?
insurance policies on these buildings? yes. "in case of a terrost attack(like the one in 19-- )?
you bet.
coincidence? for sure.
george W an innocent man? NO.
smellyfooty 4 months ago
3) the plane that hit the pentagon had a rather small weight in comparison to the pentagon which standing at many thousands of tonnes was the equivilant of you crashing your car into a brick wall at 40mph, your car wouldnt rip through it like butter it would be crushed and you badly injured, the same applies for the plane,
you know what just look at some vids, i cant be assed to comment 1000 pages of evidence.
mrh112 4 months ago
@mrh112 Actually this is a wrong comparison, let’s say your car going, not through a brick wall, but a series of cement column rising from the ground spaced about 3 feet apart. Let’s also say you are going 500 miles/hr and accelerating. Now going through the columns at that speed ,your car and everything inside will be shredded and torn apart. It will go through many of the columns.
125RTY 4 months ago
I used to beleive this was terrorists... then the government... now terrorists again!
Im sorry but after looking and actually listening to factual evidence this consperacy stuff crumbles: 1) the twin towers did not fall vertically, they collapsed slightly sideways covering about 100m of area with debris,
2) WTC7 had a huge fuel tank for its backup generator (being government) and as this burned at a few thousand degrees the floor gave out leading to the center collapse,
used up all characters
mrh112 4 months ago
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
12weasel100 5 months ago
how about we all agree that we wish the people who did lost there lifes on 9/11 will rest in peace, instead of all this argumentation, nothing is going to change even if it was a inside job, you aint getting the people who lost their lifes and the buildings back so lets just always remember what happen on 9/11/01
JakeFC17 5 months ago
@JakeFC17 we should remember 9-11 i agree but we should also bring the people responsible to justice for the victims of 9-11 . and in my opinion the victim count far exceeds the thousands lost on that day you need to count all the people killed in the name of the false war on terror . unless and until the people of America wake up to what really happened and why there will never be justice for any of the victims of these atrocities
akbdj 5 months ago
@akbdj yeah i know i agree but what im saying is that this whole thing is causing a lot of drama people should just go our seperate ways and believe what they believe instead of fighting each other over you know? and i totally believe it was an inside job im actually only 17 and i been studing everything about 9/11 even back in 1993 the wtc bombing and yes we should bring the people repossible to justice but it will never happen because the goverment will keep telling us lies sadly just like
JakeFC17 5 months ago
@akbdj when Nixon was president there was about 15 mins cut out of the president phone call tapes(i use that as an example of the government trying to cover there tracks just like they did with 9/11), the government will never admit it was an inside job and they will never let us know but yes all of us should fight for justice but im saying people shouldn't fight each other over different beliefs
JakeFC17 5 months ago
@JakeFC17 Yeah you won't get them back but you will break up the system that had them murdered and replace it with hopefully one that is more just.
mrwizard319 4 months ago
sad song for a sad day!
88Tys 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11= Inside Job
Freedomcostmoney 6 months ago
building 7 was not a controlled demolition. fires started at 9:30 because of the south tower plane crash (debris and jet fuel had reached wtc 7) the fires lasted 8 hours until the collapse at 5:30. when the north tower collapsed, it damaged and scooped out a chunk of the southern part of the building and destroyed 1 of the 3 major trusses of the building. the fires were fed by diesel fuel (back up generators)
breadsped98 6 months ago
you are terribly wrong. The buildings collapsed sideways because many stories fall onto them and the gravity exerts the floors. the 'blasts' occur because the air, dust and debris need an exit point during the collapse where all the air is being pushed out. black smoke indicates burning plastic and jet fuel. not a cool fire. the steel did not melt. the molten metal underground occurred because of the intense fire following the collapse. the core did survive, but fell down because it was unstable
breadsped98 6 months ago
I have facts on my playlist for all that bought this hook line and sinker....
MrREAPER2014 6 months ago
@nineellevenfacts I think you had better rename your channel. It's got the 9/11 bit but seems to be missing the facts.
911sausageman 6 months ago
neocon politicians ( pnac ) responsible for 911. alot are neocon zionists that only care about israel. gov fairytale is a farce. bankers? r after world domination. 5 countries left if u count libya. take these few remaing countries out and she`s rdif chips for us all. neocons went to china / russia about usa attacking iran and were laughed at thank god. get these pricks out of usa gov.
pederman15 6 months ago
Does it even matter whether you're right or wrong? All your doing is beating an already dead horse on an issue thats lasted almost a decade, and something that happened almost ten years ago. We are at war, no matter how much you kick and scream and bite and say "the government was in on it", I stand true. Rather that i carry an ideal that is fought for by thousands, than one that is whispered by only hundreds. We may be winning this war, but the fact is, we are still not done.
colonelchris92 7 months ago
@colonelchris92 does it even matter ? you make me sick you ignorant shit over 900,000 people have died because of these attacks and what about in a few more years when "another attack" on the us leads us to another war ? your stupid ass is going to say "Does it even matter whether you're right or wrong?" just like the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, and 9/11. Like wise men have said before if you have nothing important to say shut the fuck up.
L4R3T4 6 months ago
@L4R3T4 Dude... I don't know why you're gettin your panties all up in a wad... All i'm saying is that trying to justify or unjustify what has already happened, is taking away efforts to try and end the war with our side winning in totallity. I'm saying that just by arguing over this right now, we are wasting effort that we can channel to try and support the troops, so they can come home, and not have to worry about fighting over this day in, and day out.
colonelchris92 6 months ago
the explanation of why conspiracy theories are accepted is very similar to the explanation of why people reject climate change and evolution: a mistaken and hubristic belief that a lone blogger (or a small network of bloggers) can do better at explaining events than thousands of well-qualified experts. you fail.
TheDeparted112570 7 months ago
Seems some people only research a single side of this.
FievelJ69 7 months ago
I has my TIN Foil Hat... Now what!?
When is it gonna happen?
Fieve.
FievelJ69 7 months ago
Let me get this (Correct).
We are in this video, claiming (Thermite) was used, yet still claim low temperatures at the same time. Thermite, lowest temperature, 1660 Degrees. Once Thermite catches anything else on fire, it can easily get up to Temperatures over 2500 degrees. These temperatures are also hot enough to melt (Unprotected) steel.
Yet the claim is still, no temperatures hot enough to melt steel, while claiming Thermite was used?
Any1 else C A Problem there?
Fieve.
FievelJ69 7 months ago
What those firefighters heard was the floors of the building hitting the floors below them. The cores were not "indestructible." They did remained standing in both buildings for several seconds before they collapsed. If explosives were used in building 7, a series of extremely loud bangs would have been clearly recorded on all cameras present immediately prior to the collapse. Building 7 collapsed without any explosions at all.
TimothyRaymond1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The info on the REAL criminals is avaiable. Obamas a puppet. Most people are too lazy to find out but You Tube could really help ! All those interested in real freedom should watch
Loose Change
Zeitgeist
The Obama Deception
Fiat Nation
Core of Corruption
Fog of War
Tell you friends and family to watch!
Alqueda was/is funded by the CIA
mgrealdeals 7 months ago
None the less...the title of the song is absolutely true, in my point of view
Cas32dobbelt0 8 months ago
And how many innocent people died and got tortured as a result of this fake?
ehmonja 8 months ago
Those small 'explosions' were just compressed air blowing out the windows as it collapsed. And why would you need to use explosives when you had just flown a plane into the WTC. Come on you conspiracy nuts... Shut the fuck up.
bbob919 8 months ago
@ 0:51 what "smoke" doesnt melt steel? COMMON SENSE yords. shoult it be fire doesnt melt steel? of course, even though its the internet, it doesn't tell the truth... btw, those blasts stuff there are just implosions caused by the raging collapse... thanbks anyway for the facts! =)
domitechture 9 months ago
/watch?v=vvrgXodRiPQ
Watch it please
TheMattswish 9 months ago
i suggest the next time a skyscraper is to come down, lets send a plane into it. maybe add abunch of extra fuel. leave your dirty socks in it etc. it wont come down.
pederman15 9 months ago
What is the obsession with the steel 'needing' to melt? If you heat steel up to 400 degrees Celcius you can bend the stuff with your hands. The steel did NOT need to melt for the buildings to collapse.
Stain92able 9 months ago
@Stain92able when the steel is 6 foot thick?? I'm sure you can bend that with your teeth???
mjwible27 9 months ago
@mjwible27 Haha you'd definately struggle ;). But i doubt the 1000's of tons resting on it would.
Stain92able 9 months ago
@Stain92able so you really believe the planes by it's self brought the towers down????Come on man, use common sense
mjwible27 9 months ago
@mjwible27 No the plane by itself had nowhere near enough energy to bring down the building by itself. However the the energy it did have was enough to blow of fire retardant foam from the steel support columns. This coupled with a huge fire which was enough to heat the steel into a non ridgid form which eventually could not provide any structural support. This bought a rather sizable chunk of steel and concrete onto the floor below causing a pancake effect collapse.
Stain92able 9 months ago
@Stain92able whatever helps you sleep better at thinking that is the real truth.... Thanks for your info and strong teeth = )
mjwible27 9 months ago
@Stain92able so, the 1st time in HISTORY that has ever happened, when all the facts go against that, bombs were used my friend, thermite was used, that's the bottom line, inside job.
mjwible27 9 months ago
@mjwible27 Okay, I can see any sensible valid point I chose to make in aid of helping you how it is completely possible and undoubtably the case that caused the buildings to come down is a lost cause. All I can honestly say to you is you're wrong.
Stain92able 9 months ago
@Stain92able so, even the last man out, who said" about 6 to 8 seconds before the plane hit up above, felt and heard the loudest explosion from the lower level, helped a man out who's skin was all burnt off, from the lower level, that by it's self is all the evidence I need. I served my country my friend. I was in the Army and I'm telling you that you are 100% wrong.
mjwible27 9 months ago
@mjwible27 ive been around explosives all my life and im EOD for the air force and that building WAS demo'd sir.
rbarkleycf3 9 months ago
@rbarkleycf3 that's for your info and service. I was in the Army, commo field here brother and thanks for the comment!
mjwible27 9 months ago
@rbarkleycf3 Rofl you're a moron. You have been around them all your life. You ever taken down a 120 story building? Oh. You haven't. I'm sorry you don't destroy buildings you just work with explosives to blow up certain smaller devices and disabling them. Fire weakens the steel and the sheer force of 400 mph causes everything above it to be weakened. When that comes falling down onto the rest of the tower with even more force then a collapse is inevitable.
SuperSirius11 8 months ago
@SuperSirius11 So, explain the thermite then? Explain the proof they found it there???? Explain how a few fires took down WTC 7?? I guess you sneezed on that one and it fell it's self huh???
mjwible27 8 months ago
@mjwible27 There was no thermite. Tons of debris and the sheer impact of the buildings brought down WTC 7. Point proven.
SuperSirius11 8 months ago
@SuperSirius11 yes there was thermite and WTC 7 was a CONTROLLED demolition, open your mind and eyes cause the truth will set you free
mjwible27 8 months ago 2
@mjwible27 Thermite is what sparkelrs are made of. So called super thermite would have given off much more sparks. Why are there no sparks or flashes of light for explosive charges in the collapsing buildings. The blowouts are from air between each floor being pressurised by the pancaking of floor after floor in the collapse. Learn about impact loading. If you look at objects that are no longer attached to 1 and 2 at all, you will see what the free fall speed actually is compared to 1-2 falls.
tryithere 8 months ago
@SuperSirius11 Sure, point proven.
Except for the fact there WAS thermite - incredibly similar complexly-structured nanothermite particles everywhere.
I'm assuming you've watched the videos... have you seen the molten liquid pouring out of Tower Two not a minute before collapse?
/watch?v=8Mz0_x7313I
mustbeburtreynolds 8 months ago
@mjwible27 You were clearly FAR away from Manhattan on September the 11th 2001 because the WTC 7 was burning on nearly every floor, plus there was a lot of structural damage caused by the collapse of 1 and 2 tower. Further more, natural gas lines fueled the fires in building 7, which burn uncontrollably for over 6 hours. Oh and there was NO thermite found, only chemicals in the dust consistant with rust deposits throught the buildings structure.
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself actually no I was just across the way in New Jersey, but yeah good points and all, but how come other buildings have burned for more the 20 HOURS and never fell?? Only this one, the 1st in the history of our time, but good points and thanks for pointing that out for me.
mjwible27 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself oh yeah forgot, explain how BBC said building 7 came down 30 mins before it actually happened??? And that was on LIVE T.V, you can find that on youtube, look for yourself, explain that one too.
mjwible27 8 months ago
@mjwible27 Alright, so now you claim that the "British Broadcasting Corporation" had prior knowledge of this supposed "inside job" by the U.S. Government, to the point where they KNEW that WTC 7 was going to be demolished 30 minutes before it happened? LOL! I hope you realize that WTC 7 had been burning for nearly 7 hours that day and pretty much everyone in New York City (especially the media) knew #7's collapse was inevitable. The FDNY made no effort to stop the fires and it was badly damaged.
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself I don't claim, I seen it with my OWN eyes. watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s right there my friend, watch for yourself
mjwible27 8 months ago
@mjwible27 I watched the video and there is no mention of the time in which he reported the building collapsed. They used words like "apparently" - "it's been reported" and "we're hearing". But, for the sake of argument lets say they DID actually report the collapse prior the it actually happen, whether they predicted the collapse or they had knowledge of some kinda "controlled demolition". Tell me, HOW does this 'prove' that 9/11 was in fact an INSIDE JOB? Why would BBC know about a US "job"?
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself Pentagon, main example... No aircraft can get in to it's airspace with out being shot down by it defense systems, but yet 1 plane did. NORAD, with in minutes any plane that is off course is supposed to scramble fighter jets to see why it is off course, planes that day where off course for over an hour of total time. Look at the Empire state building, that was hit by a c-130 before, never fail. Look at all the buildings that have burned for more then 15 hours, never fail .
mjwible27 8 months ago
@mjwible27 Not true. I have family who live out in DC and there are commercial jets flying with striking radius of the pentagon ALL THE TIME. You really need to look into your sources here because it was a B-25 Mitchell that hit the Empire State Building NOT a C-130. In fact, the C-130 wasn't created until 9 years after the Empire State Building was struck by the b-25 in 1945. Also, the Empire State is a concrete reinforced structure, the WTC was NOT. You're either lying or misguided.
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself are you sure??? I was in the Military and I understand and know some of the technology they have. Do you honestly think and believe they don't have things that are 20 to 30 years more advanced then what they let the public know??? Come on man, you really have no idea.. Ok, my fault about that, but you are right it was a b-25, but look at the hole in left, fire damage and speed, it wasn't as big or as fast, but it did enough damage and looked a lot like the twin towers accident
mjwible27 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself and the Twin towers were built to with stand impacts from air planes. All skyscrapers are, like hey lets make this building that are so tall and luxurious, and not prepare for any thing like planes crashing in to them. To many signs point to our government knowing about it before it happened, it's sad to say this and I SERVED in the U.S Army.... and Sir, I do not lie about anything, it's just plain stupid to lie or make things up.
mjwible27 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself watch?v=VCvqXXnxLZw&feature=related .......check this video out too.
mjwible27 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60&NR=1... and another, how come Bush's story changed a few times about when he 1st fond out???I mean really, I can tell you too this day exactly where I was, what I was doing and if you ask me again 5 years from now, the story will be the SAME every single time. I just got to my doctors apt in Cherry Hill and walked in the office and seen the 1st tower had been hit, then shortly after the 2nd tower was struck my appointment was at 9am. I can tell you in DETAIL
mjwible27 8 months ago
@mjwible27 So you think George W Bush is behind the September 11th terrorist attacks on the United States responsible for killing 3,000 Americans, and NOT Al-Qaeda? You think the families of the 19 hijackers were lying? Al-Qaeda was lying? Thousands of pounds of explosives were snuck into the WTC prior to the attacks without a single soul noticing..? All the planning, effort and shear man hours needed to pull of such trickery and not a single person has blown the whistle? I mean really?!
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself Honestly, I don't know what to believe man... I've watched so many video's, have done so much research and it just doesn't add up. This one video I see, just before the 1st plane hit, a camera was on the ground, and there was an explosion just seconds before the plane hit, how does anyone explain that? What the Last Man Out as well, something is very fishy with all of it. Did anyone ever blow the whistle on JKF??
mjwible27 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself And understand this, if the powers behind everything not only threaten your life, but your WHOLE FAMILY, from parents, to cousins all the way down the line, would you keep your mouth shut? I know I would. How come a lot of KEY WITNESS'S where killed off as well? You seem like a smart person, really look behind all the bullshit and really dig in to it.
mjwible27 8 months ago
@mjwible27 Key witnesses killed? When did this happen? There were over 100 witnesses that saw a commercial jet strike the Pentagon on 9.11. I haven't heard of any of them being murdered or killed. Second: If the Government or people behind this were trying to keep the inside job a secret, then why didn't they kill the two little dipshits that made that "Loose Change" documentary? Or why didn't they at least threaten them to stop? Instead, they came out with three more editions.
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself You haven't done enough research then, do some more digging man and you'll understand better. I look at things from my own point of view. I served in the Army, I know FULLY what the military is capable of doing and handling, you have not the slightest clue on the technology they have. 9/11 could have been prevented, that sir is a fact. Now I fully think the government knew of this, it's called false flag operations, why did we go in to Iraq????? It's all a fucked up mind game
mjwible27 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself watch?v=dr4BJ89Df5Q....... Take a look at this video as well
mjwible27 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself watch?v=iU8aqx_PxnM... another.......watch?v=bvay28lZiHU..... and the video of people who die or committed suicide..... check em out man
mjwible27 8 months ago
@mjwible27 How many people do you think it would take to pull of a massive conspiracy like this? Think: The mastermind behind this "inside job" would need the following: intelligence agents, a large and skilled demolition crew with tons of explosives, nineteen Middle Eastern men willing to throw their lives away for the US Government, hundreds of false witnesses, a decent size security team, false investigators (pretty much the entire NIST, FEMA and ASoCE) along with lots and LOTS of money.
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself you should watch the interview done by Alex Jones to Aaron Russo, even he tells his side of the story, it's pretty interesting. Also, how did the JFK,MLK, RFK jobs all get covered up??? This government has lied to us so many times before and they will keep lying. Watch The Last Man out, open your eyes up man, everything on youtube.
mjwible27 8 months ago
@mjwible27 Sure I believe the Government has secrets and they have lied in the past, especially about the WMD's in Iraq. But I truly do not believe the Government was behind the September 11th attacks. I believe and pretty much know it was an attack on the U.S. by Islamic extremists. Contrary to popular belief, those "Arabs in the desert" are not just a bunch of Camel Jockies. A lot of them are highly educated, tech suave and more than capable of pulling off such coordinated attacks as 9/11.
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself did you watch the interview with Aaron Russo???
mjwible27 8 months ago
@mjwible27 Yes, I use to believe the conspiracy theories. I don't anymore. I have done plenty of research, looked at both sides of the argument and came to my own conclusion. There are lots of deceptive points of information. If you had an open mind and looked at everything subjectively, you would see. I believe the whole reason behind this conspiracy theory is simple: We like to believe that only Americans are capable of such sophisticated attacks. That no enemy is THAT intelligent. Wrong.
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
@NowKillYourself well, I respect the way you came at me from the start, in a calm and intelligent way, but I don't believe a man in a cave half way around the world planed and carried out one of the most tragic attacks in American history, and I do not believe that our government had no prior knowledge of it, epically after watch that Aaron Russo interview. We went to war with Afghanistan, then magically ended up in Iraq.
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself I served my time for this country and I seen some pretty amazing things, then seen some horrible things. If they could cover up the JFK assassination, don't you think there's other things they could pull off?I'm not trying to make you believe what I do, just pointing out some very good video's and interviews. So, it was nice having a little debate with you about it and I respect that you do not believe what I do, so take care now and God bless you.
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself I do have one last question for you though, when the 2nd plane hit, can you explain to me what was under the plane the object that is not found on ANY commercial plane, but was on that plane that day??
mjwible27 7 months ago
@mjwible27 It was hard to tell because the plane was coming in at over 500mph and I caught maybe the last two or three seconds before it struck the WTC. From my memory, it look just like a jetliner, there was nothing on the bottom. Photographic and video evidence proves it was in fact flight 175. DNA recovery from remains of the passengers on board as well as pieces of the aircraft were found around Ground Zero. I looked at photos after and it all looked like was glare from the sun.
NowKillYourself 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself they have still pictures of that plane and there is defiantly something under the belly of the plane, which is seen on Air force planes. Many people have said there is something under it as well, you can find that out for yourself. Some people even said the plane had no windows on it, that is another red flag for me too. Didn't you like how they found the passport of one of the hijackers that feel from the WTC, don't know that was possible, but they did.
mjwible27 7 months ago
@mjwible27 HMM I guess you're right then! Call up the Supreme Court, the highest prosecuting attorney you know! It was all an Inside Job because there is definitely something on the bottom of that fucking plane! Argh! Hahahahaa. Don't you think the idea that there was an elaborate plot to convince people that the Pentagon was hit by American Airlines 77 by NOT hitting it with American Airlines 77, or American Airlines 175 into the WTC, is well... Just grotesquely stupid?
NowKillYourself 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself In his book "The 9/11 Commission Report-Omissions and Distortions", for instance, David Ray Griffin tells us that the hijacker identifications have been "shown to be incorrect".
Karen Kwiatkowski, in Griffin and Peter Dale Scott's "9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out", reports that "several of the purported hijackers were found to be alive".
Jay Kolar, in Paul Zarembka's "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001" states definitively that
mjwible27 7 months ago
10 of those named by the FBI have since turned out to be alive, documented as such by authorities and interviews with those named". And Nafeez Ahmed appears sufficiently convinced by Kolar and perhaps others to say that "It is now known that at least 10 of the 19 alleged hijackers are alive according to multiple, credible news accounts by the BBC, CNN, the Telegraph, the Independent, and other international media
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself I guess this site I pulled that off is grotesquely wrong as well huh??? I'm not doing this anymore, you can think what you want. I know what's real and want's not. I pay attention do serious DETAIL, I was trained too... You take care of yourself now and there was in fact something on the BELLY OF THAT PLANE, THAT IS A FACT... Goodbye now
mjwible27 7 months ago
@mjwible27 Yeah and 136 eye witnesses who saw a American Airlines flight 77 hit the pentagon on September 11th 2001 are all lying too huh?
NowKillYourself 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself they all seen a plane, but was not flight 77, it a drone used by the U.S Military, boy you don't give and you clearly have not done your research. NO PLANE THAT IS NOT MILITARY CAN NOT FLY IN TO PENTAGON AIR SPACE, THIS IS A FACT.... Do your research hommie
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself then show me video or image of BLD 7 burning so out of control the the it fell in to it's own footprint, then I'll show you video and image and other buildings burning for over 20 hours and the STEEL FRAME was there after the fire destroyed it. Explain the object under the 2nd plane to hit the tower, guess the hijackers hand time to land the plane, put something under it. I'll show you image and video of that as well, an object under that plane, that DOES NOT ?BELONG
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself you'll realize one day, as many others are realizing now, there's more then meets the eye when it comes to this.
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself watch?v=-W2Hu70y_D8&feature=related
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself watch?v=mGF7IYi9jPM&feature=related here's your witness's to the pentagon attack, one seen the plane flying away from the pentagon
mjwible27 7 months ago
@mjwible27 So where did all the debris from the airplane come from? Oh and the human remains along with DNA evidence of all but one passenger (an infant) from flight 77..? You give me one witness that sees a plane flying away from the Pentagon, and that's supposed to do what? Discredit the 136 people who saw flight 77 hit the Pentagon?
NowKillYourself 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself dude, most people ran for cover or hid when the explosion went off. Just by the statements given by those key witness of the flight path not corresponding with the official story should make you question it. I believe it was a type of military drone that hit the pentagon, and the real plane was used as a pawn. Look up operations northwoods as well. I don't want to give my opinion on where the DNA came from and how they did it, but the official story was a lie upon many lies
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself I know deep down inside you have a little doubt, you have to question it, just like myself, a small piece of me wants to believe the government, but I can't. We went to war with Iraq over LIES, many of our troops and good friends of mine, died there. How about all the innocent Iraq people who have died? Who has benefited from this war?? It's one big HOAX man, the truth will come out some day, maybe not in our life time, but it will
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself and also, were did ALL THE BLACK BOXES GO? None of this bullshit adds up dude, none of it.
mjwible27 7 months ago
@mjwible27 You're funny.
They only lost two black boxes.
Two were beyond salvaging.
I also talked to someone one on one, (LIVE) face to face, who saw one of those... in the Wreckage in PA.
You people seem to just (Intentionally) skip the fact, crashes like these, had never been done before in aviation history. It was impossible to know prier, whether or not those (Flight Recorders) could even withstand such HARSH crashes.
Probably not, if they'd put it to the test... but there wasn't reason to..
FievelJ69 7 months ago
@mjwible27 The only black boxes that were not recovered are the ones from Flight 11 and 175. Which is understandable because they hit a 110 story building which came crashing down with energy great enough to be clearly read on a Richter magnitude scale. Have you done any of the research on this? Do you know about the United 93 mayday calls? Or Mohamed Atta's passenger addresses, recorded by Boston ARTCC? Also search: Betty Ong on Youtube. Tell me how these were faked please.
NowKillYourself 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself hahahahahah, man you believe everything they tell you. It was allllllllllll faked man, jesus dude, you believe everything they tell you, that shit was all staged. The plane she was on, had no phones in it, cute right. Oh you mean the guys passport they found outside the WTC that some made it through the huge fire ball explosion. The hijackers are still a live man, well 7 of them or so
mjwible27 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mjwible27 you have serious mental issues.
TheDeparted112570 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NowKillYourself 9/11 Truth ~ Hollywood Speaks Out - Full Movie , check that out on youtube, again many KEY EYE WITNESSES. Fireman who heard bombs going off, Willie Rodriguez who heard a bomb go off in the sub levels on the WTC a few seconds before the plane hit, but yet his testimony was never used in the 9/11 commission
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself Hijackers still alive
watch?v=4e7KW5jr9P8&feature=related
Project Achilles, proves phone calls could not be made from any cell phones, most of the planes HAD NO AIR PHONES. To fake a persons voice, go on prankdial com, they voice changing technology on there, not imagine what the government has? 30 to 50 years a head of what we know, that is a fact
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself Dick Cheney gave a stand down order to NORAD on 9/11.Norman Minetta testified under oath that Cheney gave the order & no one did nothing about it. Explain this one???? I have so much evidence and things that can clearly prove that 9/11 was an inside job man, just come out of the dark side and in to the light were you belong
mjwible27 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FievelJ69 7 months ago
@mjwible27 so the japan and haiti earthquakes and the titanic were all conspiracies too i bet.
TheDeparted112570 7 months ago
@TheDeparted112570 ok pal, cute comment but that wont fly this one idiot. I'm sure you believe the Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK by himself too, right?? Now run a long Forest Gump and I made all the post and comments here.
mjwible27 7 months ago
@mjwible27 no i dnot not believe that any more than i believe this harp bullshit haha. The alleged dangers of HAARP were dramatized in popular culture by Marvel Comics, author Tom Clancy, and The X-Files. haha COMIC BOOKS HAHA
TheDeparted112570 7 months ago
@TheDeparted112570 HAARP caused the Japan and Haiti earthquakes. I don't know enough about the Titanic to say anything intelligent about it. You can draw a direct correlation to HAARP activity on those days to the earthquakes. Science. 911 was an inside job also. Science.
Daddyo930 7 months ago
@Daddyo930 The alleged dangers of HAARP were dramatized in popular culture by Marvel Comics, author Tom Clancy, and The X-Files. COMIC BOOKS BWAHAHAHAHA!!! you people are seriously delusional!!!!!
TheDeparted112570 7 months ago
@TheDeparted112570 So you mean that the government website (haarpalaskaedu / haarp / datal) is a hoax? Sound waves can break glass and kill. If that's possible then by simple extrapolation, we can then say that sound waves can cause an earthquake. Delusional? No. Science fact.
Daddyo930 7 months ago
@Daddyo930 haha sciance my ass. i will sonner believe in the tooth fairy and santa claus. lmfao you have watched too many x-files episodes!!! haarp is a conspiracy magnet to the scientifically uninformed =)
TheDeparted112570 7 months ago
@TheDeparted112570 Then lets see how logical and rational you are. Just one question at a time. Can sound break glass?
Daddyo930 7 months ago
@mjwible27 Ever seen the movie the matrix? Some people think this grotesque reality is so sweet that they will kill you if you try and unplug them. Especially the billionaires. The one thing that bothers me about the debunkers is are they really that willfully blind and ignorant or are they just one more stupid, lazy, complacent american who does not care because the truth would inconvenience them?
Daddyo930 7 months ago
@mjwible27 That's simply NOT true, proof: watch?v=_xjBbqRJT7Q - In reality you can't just scramble some fighter jets from anywhere in the nation and intercept a commercial airliner within moments notice, especially if those commercial jets turned off their transponders. They become a needle in a haystack. Also: If you have "so much evidence" then why don't you forward it to the district attorney? I'm sure they'd love to see it for a possible criminal indictment.
NowKillYourself 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself you can look at the video's I've uploaded now, that's enough proof for me. People have tried to bring George W. to trial, they say it's a matter of national security and that's their excuse. watch?v=iU8aqx_PxnM&list=PL831178B1A7E4A158 he's a former pentagon employee, guess she's lying too,right???
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself and 911 Commission - Trans. Sec Norman Mineta Testimony, thats for RKOwens video there
mjwible27 7 months ago
@mjwible27 What State and County do you live in? I'll find your District Attorney, I will even give you the mailing address and fax number to his/her office. I want you to forward all the evidence you have on your theory of a criminal element within the U.S.A. being involved in the 9-11 Terrorist Attacks. Why not be the first one to bring JUSTICE to the "real" criminals? You will be a hero! Think about it! Just let me know when you're ready and I'll get the information for you.
NowKillYourself 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself because I'm a nobody man, you have movie stars, other politicians that are fighting this cause right now and trying to bring justice and truth from all of this. I'm just sharing what I know on youtube and getting the truth out there, opening up more eyes with facts from key eye witnesses and spreading it like a virus. It's ok man, if you have doubts now, don't be afraid, now you have seen the truth, it's up to you to share it with others
mjwible27 7 months ago
@mjwible27 Tax cab driver Lloyde England spilled the beans on the pentagon attack, now there's ALL the proof in the world that 9/11 was an inside job!
mjwible27 7 months ago
@NowKillYourself [continued] Further more, the max take-off weight of a B-25 Mitchell is 41,800 lb while the weight of a fully loaded Boeing 767-200ER (and it was fully loaded with jet fuel on 9/11) is 395,000 lb.. The max speed of the B-25 was 275mph while the 767 that hit the South Tower was clocked at over 500mph just before impact. That is WAY more energy being driven into a structure without a concrete reinforced core like the WTC, as opposed to the B-25 incident with the Empire State B.
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
@mjwible27 Yes. Because we ALL KNOW that that man was paying attention to the 400 mph plane 6 - 8 seconds before it hit. Oh wait. It's too far away and by the time he realized what he heard the plane hit seconds after.
SuperSirius11 8 months ago
@mjwible27
mjwible27 9 months ago
@Stain92able finally someone with some common sense!
TheDeparted112570 7 months ago
I know where the core is... aliens took it... God...you should waste your time on something more productive
creativebrainwave 10 months ago
Every part of this video has been completely debunked, nice try but bring real scientific evidence. and these truther websites cant be considered "credible" when they throw lies left and right, find actual evidence for this twoofer crap
iNigga4 10 months ago
@iNigga4 What debunk prove it.
enclavebrandon3 10 months ago
@enclavebrandon3 i dont have the time to waste my time debunking every theory brought up by some idiot who thinks im on government payroll to debunk theories. if you want proof, watch "Screw Loose Change" on youtube(the whole thing, watch "loose change" get entirely debunked) and RKOwens4's videos, both of whom use credible evidence and undeniable proof straight from the experts, not from websites like twoofers with exxagerated claims, left off quotes, and confused witnesses as "evidence"
iNigga4 10 months ago
@iNigga4 Then i can say watch videos on how its impossible by phyisics that a building not hit by a plane can free fall. Theres engineers and aritechs who say how its impossible for a jet to take down the towers.
enclavebrandon3 10 months ago
@enclavebrandon3 then i can say how you obviously never timed the collapses for yourself. south tower is 14-16 seconds while the north tower is about 22, no 9 second free-fall. not to mention theres the huge majority of engineers and architects who do agree a FUCKING 80 TON JET AIRLINER with thousands of gallons of jet fuel which can burn at temperatures that can weaken steel well beyond 50% along with approxamitely 25%+ of supports being severed/seriously damaged. Not enough?
iNigga4 10 months ago
@iNigga4 Fire cant burn steel -_- heres a test of thermite being used /watch?v=uPpvbb5XgLU also when if your statement is true why did a building in cina burn for hours with no collapse? it the statement proves that fire can not burn steel. Also i call bullshit on your statement of people who agree that some how jet fuel can burn down a building, also if your statement about it being seriously demaged then why did it all collapse why not just above it why the whole thing?
enclavebrandon3 10 months ago
@enclavebrandon3 fire can weaken steel, especially the 1800 Farenheit fires burning at the WTC, where more than 50% of steels strength lost with support having already been destroyed, the buildings couldnt have held themself up any longer, so when the breaking point of 1 truss snapped it crushed on another and another until it reached the ground, while the "indestructable" core as this moron calls it stood for a few seconds after before collapsing as it had been badly damaged by collapse.
iNigga4 10 months ago
@iNigga4 Sigh i feel like if we keep fighting we will get no ware lets just agree to disagree. But still the fire once agian was not hot enough to burn steel unless there was nano-thermite. Before september 11 why was there lots of painting and construction going on around the wtc? Or why did other nations tell bush there was going to be a attack on america. heres a bigger question why was 2.3 trillon dollars missing from the pentagon on september 10 2001, And then the next day it was attacked?
enclavebrandon3 10 months ago
@iNigga4 Or the face these terriost onlt hit 75% of there targets?
enclavebrandon3 10 months ago