Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
@cacoethes138 I've wached tons of videos I agree with today. You just can't understand them cuz they'r ein french. But hey, so you admite you wanna be drugged?
I remember when I was listening to a lecture by Richard Dawkins and he said my friend the late Douglas Adams I just thought SAY WHATT???!!!! I was overly excited to say the least Richard Dawkings and Douglas Adams are my sugar and coffee Richard Dawkings of course is the coffee because he "preaches" atheism with a very blunt tone where as Douglas Adams "preaches" atheism in a more mellow and funny way making him the sugar.
Wonderful to see Adams and Dawkins. I read Adams so long ago, then through him I learned about Dawkins Then read the Selfish Gene. So, I have to thank fiction for exposing me to non-fiction. These two people have changed my life.
I will always be thankful to them.
PS. I will be bringing my towel when I travel into the unknown!
I'm surprised dawkins would allow this. something came from nothing? there is no evidence of nothing. nothing has never been observed, measured, or tested? not to mention, in order for it to be nothing, something cannot come of, through or because of it. no a very convincing clip sadly
Bit of a Vogon-like comment. Let's take everything literally and disregard the fact that writers, especially humorists, depend on exaggeration to make the different aspects of their stories interesting. Now if we could have a hardcopy of the interview, lose it, find it, subject it to public inquiry, bury it in soft peat for three months and recycle it as firelighters.
profound argumentation there. you sure showed me alright. my rational critique is shot to pieces because i've been called a retard. well i'll just pack it in then. i've clearly been bettered by an intellectual giant.
one cannot say an argument for God is from the negative and then say nothing is something because we are talking about it. we must be consistent in our method of discourse
The Christian idea of nothing is different to the scientific idea of nothing. The bible insinuates that God existed when there was nothing. Regardless of whether God was immaterial or not, this suggests that time existed when there was nothing. Whereas the idea of the "Big-Bang" type of nothing is the true nothing; no time, no empty space, just nothing. There is some evidence for this, such as the universe is expanding from a point. But I'm no physicist, just a thinker...
The visible marks of extraordinary wisdom and power appear so plainly in all the works of the creation that a rational creature, who will but seriously reflect on them, cannot miss the discovery of a Deity. --- John Locke
...All claim that these things are real. However, in the real world we don't see the required results if this were the case. If someone starts praying for an injured person, they don't start glowing and heal instantaneously. Dead people don't come back to life. This is a very simplified summary but do you gather my reasoning? Maybe I'm way off, but religious people don't seem to have a good grasp of what our world "should" look like if the claims of their religions are true.
Novels are a way of stirring the imagination. From imagination comes ideas to work forward to making a reality, using what knowledge you have accumulated, or have available to you in the form of scientific books.
This is one of the themes I'd like to develop in the following days (the uselessness of novel literature compared to scientific literature), when I will have some time from exams, and papers. Because we really need many more scientists than writers of novels. We are still in complete ignorance of so much stuff, that as human race we should understand how dangerous it is to be in such condition. Instead many people don't care a little bit.
Whilst it would be good to have more scientists I have to disagree about the "uselessness" of the novel. If i hadn't had novels as a way of escape I would have killed either myself or a shit-load of other people by now. Art is not useless it just doesn't have the same obvious practical use as science.
I agree that we could certainly stand to have more popular science writers, however I would hardly call novel literature useless even in a comparitive sense. Personally, I am a fan of fantasy novels, and I have found that they are an excellent medium by which one can understand and determine reality. Furthermore, it was my interest in fantasy worlds that led me to take further notice of science and philosophy, and I'm sure I'm not a unique case.
So let's see if I understand your reasoning. You like fantasy novels, which are based on Real Writers who made it up to explain a real thing, they probably read in a scientific book, since most writers don't quote their sources and you could also understand just reading a scientific book? It seems a little childish to me, I don't need double sources. Further fantasy novels cannot be used to "determine" reality, an experiment can determine reality, a novel is just a novel.
Let me put it to you this way. You state that my reasoning is childish, however, I was a child when I read most of the fantasy books that I would consider classics. When push comes to shove, if children are given the choice between reading fiction or non-fiction, they are going to pick fiction. Therefore, isn't it a positive thing that these fiction novels discuss and explore scientific and philosophical concepts in a setting that is appealing to young people?
Well as you have surely read Plato in the Republic, he would argue that those books are corrupting young minds (the fantasy novel with ideas of magic, prayer and all the other stuff) and wouldn't help them to grow but just hinder them. In fact as you can notice we have people who really believe that the world was created 6500 years ago, because unfortunately they remained at child level mentally. The same for the guys who made themselves explode because 72 virgins are waiting them.
Surely you do not mean to imply that the human mind is so weak that it believes whatever it reads is true. The examples you gave? It is not because of scripture, in and of itself, that these people suffer delusions, it's because of religious culture, herd mentality.
I maintain that reading fiction is an excellent way of expanding ones imagination, and that expanding ones imagination is important. Where do you think science would be without it? Dawkins himself says the same thing.
Well I believe there are some facts you are forgetting, there are 2 billion of individuals who believe that a palestinian virgin gave birth to god. Another billion individuals believe that a pedophile who had sex with a 9 year old was contacted by an angel and wrote a holy book, also if he was a bedouin and didn't even know how to write. Frankly I don't need novels to expand my imagination, is enough to take a trip to mexico, or Brasil and watch some kids used as organs reservoir.
"Further fantasy novels cannot be used to "determine" reality, an experiment can determine reality, a novel is just a novel."
Since you're commenting on a Dawkins vid I assume you are at least familiar with the creation/evolution "debate". Now, I would assert that most fantasy novels explore worlds that are designed and influenced by deities. In these worlds there is magic. Prayers work. There are "chosen ones". And quite often there are prophecies. In some form or other, religions...(cont)
I bought my daughter two science books for her 1st year in university over £200-, a science fiction novel would only have cost about £20-.
Im struggling as it is just to get the books my daughter needs so just cant afford informal science books. You charge to much, you are competing with the woo pedlars get real with the costs.
I would like to be able to buy some Dawkins books but have any idea what the relevant cost is to me, I earn less than £50- a day.
ooooo, is this new vid we haven't previously seen of Adams? I haven't seen this one online b4, sweet, I miss him =( We need the genius of Adams now as we did when he lived.
sensible man. a good writer, a good speaker. enthusiast in the complexity of the world!
happinesson 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
SpencerBenedict2nd 3 months ago
Somebody should have told him a bout a fantastic invention called a cable tidy.
vibins360 3 months ago
He was a great man and we have so much of his wisdom and humor preserved for us.
micometer 3 months ago
What is 7 x 7?
32780tit 4 months ago
This is so sad to see now posthumously. Anyone know how he died? I forget.
ZachRose88 5 months ago
@ZachRose88 Heart attack, while at his home gym in California I think. So long, and thanks for all the fish
32780tit 4 months ago
@cacoethes138 I've wached tons of videos I agree with today. You just can't understand them cuz they'r ein french. But hey, so you admite you wanna be drugged?
desasterz 6 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
But probably absolutely out of nothing... Is the MMMOST STUPID... IDEA! and spending your life following that is time wasted as far as I'm concerned.
desasterz 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'd rather spend time with Jesus
desasterz 10 months ago
nobody's interested in what app he's writing in? =O I sure wanna know =3
zzzspawn 1 year ago
I remember when I was listening to a lecture by Richard Dawkins and he said my friend the late Douglas Adams I just thought SAY WHATT???!!!! I was overly excited to say the least Richard Dawkings and Douglas Adams are my sugar and coffee Richard Dawkings of course is the coffee because he "preaches" atheism with a very blunt tone where as Douglas Adams "preaches" atheism in a more mellow and funny way making him the sugar.
heroesandcons09 1 year ago 6
douglas adam s cool! i must have made a mistake on wich vid i did my last comment.
mysticalsoulqc 1 year ago
Comment removed
mysticalsoulqc 1 year ago
@mysticalsoulqc so convince that he lies, 'cause right now all i see is ranting about and abusive language
speaking of which, learn proper english before you ramble on
hipp6y 1 year ago
I was a fan of both Dawkins' and Douglas' work separately. And then when I found out they were friends I literally went bananas!
Both of these people instill awe in me :)
Houdinitreehouse 1 year ago 8
so refreshing to hear the word 'awesome' used in an appropriate way
updebracket 1 year ago 14
@updebracket yeah, its awesome.
egeusz 1 year ago
What a great loss. I Wonder what he would say about the atheist movement now? I cannot respect him too much.
petphotog 2 years ago
Douglas Adams was such a marvel of a man; I sincerely wish I could have met him.
May he rest in peace, and be always remembered.
PlanetCool42 2 years ago 2
"Seventy or eighty years of your life..."
If only, Douglas, if only...
bigjohn756 2 years ago 57
Wonderful to see Adams and Dawkins. I read Adams so long ago, then through him I learned about Dawkins Then read the Selfish Gene. So, I have to thank fiction for exposing me to non-fiction. These two people have changed my life.
I will always be thankful to them.
PS. I will be bringing my towel when I travel into the unknown!
CerisePsyche 2 years ago 9
RIP Douglas :(
bondfrenchbond 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
.
I warned you Christians, the kingdom of God is about to take over this world, prepare yourself, be holy, be like Christ.
.
conceil8 2 years ago
Shame it wasn't 70 or 80 years. But he sure did make the 49 he had count!
please42 2 years ago 39
ah I miss this cool frood! he really knew where his towel was!!
Took years to get the Babel fish in your Infocom text adventure Douglas! We miss you guy!
JoeChrisMorris 2 years ago 2
Look at all those wires hanging out of the back of Douglas Adams' computer. Makes me glad I have my macbook.
vibins360 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The God Debate" is on my channel.
atheistfriends 2 years ago
I'm surprised dawkins would allow this. something came from nothing? there is no evidence of nothing. nothing has never been observed, measured, or tested? not to mention, in order for it to be nothing, something cannot come of, through or because of it. no a very convincing clip sadly
kdurston1 2 years ago
Bit of a Vogon-like comment. Let's take everything literally and disregard the fact that writers, especially humorists, depend on exaggeration to make the different aspects of their stories interesting. Now if we could have a hardcopy of the interview, lose it, find it, subject it to public inquiry, bury it in soft peat for three months and recycle it as firelighters.
RenegadeSalmon 2 years ago 3
you sir, are a retard.
ZombieJesusLovesMe 2 years ago
profound argumentation there. you sure showed me alright. my rational critique is shot to pieces because i've been called a retard. well i'll just pack it in then. i've clearly been bettered by an intellectual giant.
kdurston1 2 years ago 4
If nothing has never been observed why are you talking about it?
broadcastyamum 2 years ago
one cannot say an argument for God is from the negative and then say nothing is something because we are talking about it. we must be consistent in our method of discourse
kdurston1 2 years ago
Comment removed
broadcastyamum 2 years ago
The Christian idea of nothing is different to the scientific idea of nothing. The bible insinuates that God existed when there was nothing. Regardless of whether God was immaterial or not, this suggests that time existed when there was nothing. Whereas the idea of the "Big-Bang" type of nothing is the true nothing; no time, no empty space, just nothing. There is some evidence for this, such as the universe is expanding from a point. But I'm no physicist, just a thinker...
broadcastyamum 2 years ago
Both are my heroes!
totaldynamix 2 years ago 4
aww. he seems like such a lovely man. i feel like i've missed out by not meeting him.
but his books will always keep him alive in our hearts and brains. (mostly in our brains though.).
glebber 2 years ago 6
Adams will always live forever in our hearts!
ViperRob42 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
The visible marks of extraordinary wisdom and power appear so plainly in all the works of the creation that a rational creature, who will but seriously reflect on them, cannot miss the discovery of a Deity. --- John Locke
markpianoman 2 years ago
"Space is BIG!" - Adams
noswonky 3 years ago
"Really BIG!"
TomMSTie 3 years ago
Reallly, Really Big, you wouldn;'t believe how ming boggling big it is! ...and so on...
ViperRob42 2 years ago 3
Damn, I can't remember the next part. :-\
TomMSTie 2 years ago
"You may think it a long way down to the chemist but thats just penuts to space, listen..."
T0mNZ 2 years ago 3
Thank you.
TomMSTie 2 years ago 2
You might think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's nothing in comparison to space. Listen.
ahdkaw 2 years ago 3
Thank you.
TomMSTie 2 years ago 2
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so!
JoeChrisMorris 2 years ago 2
"The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book."
Goodbye again Douglas you are missed. If there is a life after this save a Pangalactic Gargleblaster for me.
petehjr1 3 years ago 2
Pfttt. Life after death. i seriously doubt he believed in such nonsense.
pokermaster54 3 years ago 3
Sorry for the inconvenience.
ChangePerTime 3 years ago
The answer is 42
designinsight 3 years ago 3
But what is the question?
will070361 3 years ago
What do you get when you multiply 6 by 9?
TomMSTie 3 years ago 4
R.I. P. Douglas. Life became a little less funny when you died.
Albinoceros 3 years ago 3
I feel selfish but we missed out on a lot losing him to early.
grenangle 3 years ago
A man worth so much more remembrance than any prophet or preacher. Do something worth while go buy one of his books and spread the smiles.
jakrum 3 years ago 2
...All claim that these things are real. However, in the real world we don't see the required results if this were the case. If someone starts praying for an injured person, they don't start glowing and heal instantaneously. Dead people don't come back to life. This is a very simplified summary but do you gather my reasoning? Maybe I'm way off, but religious people don't seem to have a good grasp of what our world "should" look like if the claims of their religions are true.
threewiseman1 3 years ago
49 is to early to die.
Even though I never met you, I miss you.
lostagainrob 3 years ago 2
Damn it... Why did he have to die? He's so awesome.
SatanOfTheAngels 3 years ago
Douglass's last comment has a (albeit unintentionally) savage irony about it.
NeverarGreat 3 years ago
RIP Douglas
Love both these guys
dummbatz48 3 years ago
Hope Richard brought his towel.
wimscheers 3 years ago 2
DONT PANIC!
Raedan23 3 years ago 3
Novels are a way of stirring the imagination. From imagination comes ideas to work forward to making a reality, using what knowledge you have accumulated, or have available to you in the form of scientific books.
Zoobeezoo 3 years ago
Douglas Adams and Richard Dawkins, what a badass team.
Ryan44567 3 years ago 6
how old was Richard Dawkins he looks like he's 20
Car2oon12 3 years ago 2
I'm sure he'd thank you for that! He was 55 when the programme was made (1996).
daichi2097 3 years ago
I feel like Douglas Adams did when it comes to science.
Science FTW : )
MagnusIan 3 years ago
This is one of the themes I'd like to develop in the following days (the uselessness of novel literature compared to scientific literature), when I will have some time from exams, and papers. Because we really need many more scientists than writers of novels. We are still in complete ignorance of so much stuff, that as human race we should understand how dangerous it is to be in such condition. Instead many people don't care a little bit.
daudnew2009 3 years ago
Whilst it would be good to have more scientists I have to disagree about the "uselessness" of the novel. If i hadn't had novels as a way of escape I would have killed either myself or a shit-load of other people by now. Art is not useless it just doesn't have the same obvious practical use as science.
arcanics1971 3 years ago
I agree that we could certainly stand to have more popular science writers, however I would hardly call novel literature useless even in a comparitive sense. Personally, I am a fan of fantasy novels, and I have found that they are an excellent medium by which one can understand and determine reality. Furthermore, it was my interest in fantasy worlds that led me to take further notice of science and philosophy, and I'm sure I'm not a unique case.
threewiseman1 3 years ago
So let's see if I understand your reasoning. You like fantasy novels, which are based on Real Writers who made it up to explain a real thing, they probably read in a scientific book, since most writers don't quote their sources and you could also understand just reading a scientific book? It seems a little childish to me, I don't need double sources. Further fantasy novels cannot be used to "determine" reality, an experiment can determine reality, a novel is just a novel.
daudnew2009 3 years ago
Let me put it to you this way. You state that my reasoning is childish, however, I was a child when I read most of the fantasy books that I would consider classics. When push comes to shove, if children are given the choice between reading fiction or non-fiction, they are going to pick fiction. Therefore, isn't it a positive thing that these fiction novels discuss and explore scientific and philosophical concepts in a setting that is appealing to young people?
threewiseman1 3 years ago 2
Well as you have surely read Plato in the Republic, he would argue that those books are corrupting young minds (the fantasy novel with ideas of magic, prayer and all the other stuff) and wouldn't help them to grow but just hinder them. In fact as you can notice we have people who really believe that the world was created 6500 years ago, because unfortunately they remained at child level mentally. The same for the guys who made themselves explode because 72 virgins are waiting them.
daudnew2009 3 years ago
Surely you do not mean to imply that the human mind is so weak that it believes whatever it reads is true. The examples you gave? It is not because of scripture, in and of itself, that these people suffer delusions, it's because of religious culture, herd mentality.
I maintain that reading fiction is an excellent way of expanding ones imagination, and that expanding ones imagination is important. Where do you think science would be without it? Dawkins himself says the same thing.
threewiseman1 3 years ago 2
Well I believe there are some facts you are forgetting, there are 2 billion of individuals who believe that a palestinian virgin gave birth to god. Another billion individuals believe that a pedophile who had sex with a 9 year old was contacted by an angel and wrote a holy book, also if he was a bedouin and didn't even know how to write. Frankly I don't need novels to expand my imagination, is enough to take a trip to mexico, or Brasil and watch some kids used as organs reservoir.
daudnew2009 3 years ago
But reading is good yeah?
davesake 2 years ago
"Further fantasy novels cannot be used to "determine" reality, an experiment can determine reality, a novel is just a novel."
Since you're commenting on a Dawkins vid I assume you are at least familiar with the creation/evolution "debate". Now, I would assert that most fantasy novels explore worlds that are designed and influenced by deities. In these worlds there is magic. Prayers work. There are "chosen ones". And quite often there are prophecies. In some form or other, religions...(cont)
threewiseman1 3 years ago
I love seeing videos with Richard Dawkins and Douglas Adams together. It's magic. :)
PunkCabaretFTW 3 years ago 2
nice computer
FusionNinjin 3 years ago
Rest in peace, Mr. Adams.
We miss your creativity and sharp wits.
Athaeus 3 years ago
I bought my daughter two science books for her 1st year in university over £200-, a science fiction novel would only have cost about £20-.
Im struggling as it is just to get the books my daughter needs so just cant afford informal science books. You charge to much, you are competing with the woo pedlars get real with the costs.
I would like to be able to buy some Dawkins books but have any idea what the relevant cost is to me, I earn less than £50- a day.
billythefifer 3 years ago
why don't you go to a library? Here in US most of the libraries have books of Dawkins as well as other philosophers.
daudnew2009 3 years ago
I spent a large portion of my teenaged years reading Douglas Adams.
That was time well spent too!
forensicgirl3 3 years ago
Such a good one! Thanks!
2bsirius 3 years ago
i eat porcupine sandwiches!!!
1GOD1JESUS 3 years ago
mm.. yum yum
Oxygaunt 3 years ago
I wish he had 70 or 80 years to spend. =(
sy1234 3 years ago 2
ooooo, is this new vid we haven't previously seen of Adams? I haven't seen this one online b4, sweet, I miss him =( We need the genius of Adams now as we did when he lived.
ViperRob42 3 years ago
i miss him too :(
SCX2k 3 years ago
when did he pass away?
chris3443 3 years ago
i'm so tired.....
Kwijibo87 3 years ago
=( I still get sad about Douglas Adams even now ten years later.
fathead8489 3 years ago
yeah....
SCX2k 3 years ago
douglas was, is and always will be the shat.
nozr138 3 years ago
why?
astat1 3 years ago
he is one of the best!
nozr138 3 years ago
but why "the shat"? What do you mean by that? I don't think it's the best epithet to describe D. Adams.
astat1 3 years ago
what i meant was douglas adams is the shit. no disrespect at all. he is great. by far one of my favorite authors.
nozr138 3 years ago
Comment removed
HomoGeneyes 3 years ago
shouldn't that read "if the villains behind this plot find you are to"?
kandtell 3 years ago
Comment removed
HomoGeneyes 3 years ago
Top stuff! Douglas Adams, now where's that fish interface thingy, lol!
Rowdyeh 3 years ago
fish interface?
do you mean the babelfish?
SCX2k 3 years ago
Yep!
Rowdyeh 3 years ago
awesome
yahyahtoopy 3 years ago
Nice :)
MrMetal616 3 years ago