al gores party choise is so fitting. he said it just below the earths surfice its millions of degres well there it is hotter than the sun global warming solved remove the heat from just below the surface and look it fixes volcanos earth quacks C02 h2s all the earths problems
in my opinnion is al gores cheap shot at glory to try and bring our world together without war the earth will change haiti should be a reminder that all of our lilttle tiny efforts to try and play mother nature are a waste of time. in an instant we could be gonzo we are not in control - we made this we should live with it.. what of the ice age did man cause that? gore got his nobel he lost an election and his wife put warning stickers on albums hasnt he done enough already?
Global warming are happen, its perceptive. But the cause are not the increase of CO2 level by the humans; but a normal cycle of the sun, that happens from time to time.
plz turn off yr tv and stpo absorbing propaganda when u want to know about things research them but dont just take the tv as gospel,,,u believe global warming b/c u have heard it on tv for years just b/c something is said ovr and over doesnt make it so,,please people we are in the fight of our lives and we cld lose america if this goes thru
These so-called skeptics don't know anything about the scientific peer-review system and the difficulty of making and maintaining a good reputation in the global scientific community. I think we have the media and the educational system to thank for that.
oil companies are behind all the green ads havent u seen this? people like al gore are cons &make billions while starving the third word, KILL them w vaccines and other soft kill weapons,,,all u leftists shld be up in arms the way they are killing humanity but instead u hang on to unproven science that u know nothing about.. yr under an advanced mind control program that catches weak minded people and distorts thinking if u dont seek out pro and con scientists yr bias ask yrelf why
Lord Munckton is a journalist with no scientific credentials at all. He claims to be a member of the House of Lords and he isn't. He claims his article was peer-reviewed and it wasn't and it's riddled with errors and the consensus of people who actually have science degrees disagree with him.
Ah yes, the consensus of conspirators? The consensus of number-inventing pseudo-scientists? Who cares?
I don't care what so-called "credentials" you ascribe to Lord Munckton, the man is brilliant and totally and completely right on the issue of anthropogenic climate change.
True, true. But remember, I said "scientific consensus", not mere consensus. These two are oceans apart. Note that two of the cardinal virtues of science are skepticism and competition. A third cardinal virtue is honesty. These are cardinal virtues in science because, to be a scientist, one must take what everybody says with a grain of salt, one must always look for flaws in another person's arguments or findings and one must be happy in carefully proving another person wrong.
And, this is where honesty comes in, since any scientists knows that all his peers will be more than happy to prove him wrong (because then they would have made a discovery, and that is the negation of your claim, or because you would not have beaten them to a solution or discovery), a scientists should be really, really honest and careful in formulating a theory or hypothesis. Therefore, although a mere consensus of morons is worth nothing, a scientific consensus is worth billions.
It is quite clear that scientists who get funding from governments sing the tune picked by these governments. Falsifying data to meet government pre-approved 'conclusions' and all that...
I've never heard him cite his own work, so his credentials (or lack of) aren't important. What he does do is shine light on the facts that the climatologist are ignoring.
By the way, he didnt claim to be a member of the HoL, only a peer. I don't know about your other claims, but I'm sure they fall in line with the first one.
Carbon credit trading exhibits a high probability for derivatives fraud. The other dangerous item is carbon derivatives trading due to its use by organized crime to launder funds from illegal activities as well as abuse by same people who manipulated the recent financial debacle. The risk of huge a financial fraud is carbon derivatives than it is with carbon credits themselves. Derivatives nearly destroyed the worlds economies !
Wake up! It's all another giant scam to drain the people dry.
Alex Jones looks like the same kind of genetic throwback as Glen Beck. (Talk about evidence of a eugenics program) As much as I like a good conspiracy theory, "climate-gate" is an attempt to glom everything from fluoride in drinking water to 9/11 into some kind of master plan by the Bilderburgs. This problem is not like religion, which you can choose to believe or not. If we don't listen to our scientist, then as Darryl Hannah said in Blade Runner, "We are stupid, and we will die."
YOU ARE A MORON,,,maybe u shld not selectively listen to only the ones u agree with,,,and remember these words when yr kids are all retarded and yr destitute
Alex Jones is where you get your information??? No wonder.
He's an entertainer. Even he doesn't believe the things he says. He's just someone who knows that America's appetite for paranoid theories is insatiable.
Please can you explain why in the last great ice age the CO2 ppm (parts per million) level was 8 times higher than it is today?
Can you also please explain to me the medieval warm period... there were no cars or planes around then.
Also can you explain why if global warming and the green house effect is sooo bad why politicians only want to regulate CO2 and not other green house gases like methane and nitrous oxide? 1 gram of methane is 22 times as damaging as 1gram of CO2 even the IPCC agree.
It does not matter what the politicians or the right-wing radio personalities or the oil companies say.
All that matters is what the scientists say.
They have taken carbon dioxide levels during the last ice age and the Medieval warm period into account and they have decided that carbon dioxide we are releasing is causing global warming which is leading to shifts in wind patterns and significant climate change all around the world.
I assume you know that you can't take three data points and make a case from that alone. Scientists who devote their entire lives to analyzing all available data are comfortable that the scientific consensus is correct.
What are your credentials?
If you want to get a degree in climate science and do a study, go for it. Perhaps ten years of study will lead you to the conclusion my barber had reached already.
If they take out the methane and nitrous oxide the sun would burn you to a crisp because the ozone would collapse....I'm not a scientist,just using simple logic.
the climate scientists that are on the UN Payroll are dirty and many of the 1500 scientists say they were never consulted and do not agree that climate change is man made,,,the climate cools and heats up in cycles... this is an attempt to rob us blind please look ninto the climate gate emails and read them ,,,scientists have been ruining anyone who disagrees w/them and even journals that publish materials contrary to their myth,,the oil companies are behind this they are trading carbon credits
I wonder if they will debate Al Gores false statements ( his latest was actually yesterday in a speech he said data from Dr. [Wieslav] Maslowski has the Arctic Caps melting away within 5 years, the Dr. has completely denied ever saying this), Hacked Emails (Climate-gate) that shows everything is based on fake data to keep scienetists in their governmnet grants, or the Fact that the Planet is actually cooling not getting warmer.
All this is is a political agenda to "spread the weatlh"!
so will you be debating on all sides, or just following CNN main news channel, and not cover the fact that climate change is a natural things, the fact that the earth has not warmed in the last 10 years, will you mention the medieval warm period, and the fact that we are heading for a cool period? Oh and will anyone mention the emails from the CRU, NASA's data and the UK met office? will someone mention that the models used do not add up to real time data as shown by many top scientists of today
If you believe in science itself, and your comment suggests that you do, why do you have so little faith in scientists?
The consensus among climate scientists is that humanity is changing the temperature of the atmosphere and that it's having devastating effects already all around the globe.
Get your science from academies of science, not from right-wing politicians and the oil industry.
Climatologist have dealt with this issue and "common sense" has nothing to do with assessing scientific observations that often go against the assembly of prejudices, cultural mythology and utter bullshit that common sense is, also, names and creds, or gtfo.
lol... that funny 2436ab
alifaqmal 1 month ago
CNN = Crappy Nonsense News
x2436ab 9 months ago
Anything involving CNN is bad!
mramash2000 2 years ago
this vedio is funny
abdullaal1 2 years ago
al gores party choise is so fitting. he said it just below the earths surfice its millions of degres well there it is hotter than the sun global warming solved remove the heat from just below the surface and look it fixes volcanos earth quacks C02 h2s all the earths problems
rocks2rocks06 2 years ago
in my opinnion is al gores cheap shot at glory to try and bring our world together without war the earth will change haiti should be a reminder that all of our lilttle tiny efforts to try and play mother nature are a waste of time. in an instant we could be gonzo we are not in control - we made this we should live with it.. what of the ice age did man cause that? gore got his nobel he lost an election and his wife put warning stickers on albums hasnt he done enough already?
matthewTmccourt 2 years ago
Climategate has changed everything.
We need to get to the bottom of that tangled web first.
Freenetnow 2 years ago
911 was an internal job. See "ZeitGeist" film.
rogerioctbacwb 2 years ago
yes it was , global warming is also a myth !
poopydoolarroo 2 years ago
Global warming are happen, its perceptive. But the cause are not the increase of CO2 level by the humans; but a normal cycle of the sun, that happens from time to time.
rogerioctbacwb 2 years ago
This is all a bunch of crap! Copenhagen is not Hopenhagen; it is schmopenhagen. The biggest ineffectual joke of a treaty since the league of nations.
YoungBrave2006 2 years ago
plz turn off yr tv and stpo absorbing propaganda when u want to know about things research them but dont just take the tv as gospel,,,u believe global warming b/c u have heard it on tv for years just b/c something is said ovr and over doesnt make it so,,please people we are in the fight of our lives and we cld lose america if this goes thru
candiceevans1 2 years ago
Candice,
I think you need to find more reliable sources of information.
Just because everybody agrees on something, that doesn't make it false. Right?
Scientific consensus is achieved by thousands of scientists working independently and publishing their results in peer-reviewed journals.
There is no conspiracy of all the scientists in the world. How in the world would such a conspiracy be possible?
en.wikipedia . org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change
ReliableInsider 2 years ago
ReliableInsider,
These so-called skeptics don't know anything about the scientific peer-review system and the difficulty of making and maintaining a good reputation in the global scientific community. I think we have the media and the educational system to thank for that.
sassygal7777 2 years ago
The climate liars 'peer-review' eachothers work... they are all liars.
CLIAMTE CHANGE = NATURAL PHENOMENON and there is NOTHING mankind can do except to adapt... stopping it is impossible
san77vb 2 years ago
oil companies are behind all the green ads havent u seen this? people like al gore are cons &make billions while starving the third word, KILL them w vaccines and other soft kill weapons,,,all u leftists shld be up in arms the way they are killing humanity but instead u hang on to unproven science that u know nothing about.. yr under an advanced mind control program that catches weak minded people and distorts thinking if u dont seek out pro and con scientists yr bias ask yrelf why
candiceevans1 2 years ago
This is so wrong I don't know where to start. Oh wait, let's start with your English!
sassygal7777 2 years ago
I agree, Global Warming is just a sham.
Pennys1 2 years ago
Any debate without Lord Munckton (sic) is a sham. The man is the single most intelligent speaker on this topic in the entire world.
uttles 2 years ago
uttles,
Lord Munckton is a journalist with no scientific credentials at all. He claims to be a member of the House of Lords and he isn't. He claims his article was peer-reviewed and it wasn't and it's riddled with errors and the consensus of people who actually have science degrees disagree with him.
-Including- the American Physical Society.
ReliableInsider 2 years ago
Ah yes, the consensus of conspirators? The consensus of number-inventing pseudo-scientists? Who cares?
I don't care what so-called "credentials" you ascribe to Lord Munckton, the man is brilliant and totally and completely right on the issue of anthropogenic climate change.
uttles 2 years ago
Even though the overwhelming majority of the climate scientists in the world and the overwhelming majority of scientists generally disagree with him.
uttles, Science. Is not a conspiracy.
ReliableInsider 2 years ago
@uttles
OK, so you are perfectly allright with the guy being exposed as a liar and a total scammer?! Dumbass treehuggers!
YoungBrave2006 2 years ago
You are utterly ignorant of the scientific peer-review system. And you're calling scientific consensus a "conspiracy"? That's so, so sad.
sassygal7777 2 years ago
a consensus is not scientific, a bunch of morons can have a consensus about something
blakespower 2 years ago
True, true. But remember, I said "scientific consensus", not mere consensus. These two are oceans apart. Note that two of the cardinal virtues of science are skepticism and competition. A third cardinal virtue is honesty. These are cardinal virtues in science because, to be a scientist, one must take what everybody says with a grain of salt, one must always look for flaws in another person's arguments or findings and one must be happy in carefully proving another person wrong.
sassygal7777 2 years ago
And, this is where honesty comes in, since any scientists knows that all his peers will be more than happy to prove him wrong (because then they would have made a discovery, and that is the negation of your claim, or because you would not have beaten them to a solution or discovery), a scientists should be really, really honest and careful in formulating a theory or hypothesis. Therefore, although a mere consensus of morons is worth nothing, a scientific consensus is worth billions.
sassygal7777 2 years ago
It is quite clear that scientists who get funding from governments sing the tune picked by these governments. Falsifying data to meet government pre-approved 'conclusions' and all that...
san77vb 2 years ago
I've never heard him cite his own work, so his credentials (or lack of) aren't important. What he does do is shine light on the facts that the climatologist are ignoring.
By the way, he didnt claim to be a member of the HoL, only a peer. I don't know about your other claims, but I'm sure they fall in line with the first one.
csgforme 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Carbon credit trading exhibits a high probability for derivatives fraud. The other dangerous item is carbon derivatives trading due to its use by organized crime to launder funds from illegal activities as well as abuse by same people who manipulated the recent financial debacle. The risk of huge a financial fraud is carbon derivatives than it is with carbon credits themselves. Derivatives nearly destroyed the worlds economies !
Wake up! It's all another giant scam to drain the people dry.
louis12346 2 years ago
Alex Jones looks like the same kind of genetic throwback as Glen Beck. (Talk about evidence of a eugenics program) As much as I like a good conspiracy theory, "climate-gate" is an attempt to glom everything from fluoride in drinking water to 9/11 into some kind of master plan by the Bilderburgs. This problem is not like religion, which you can choose to believe or not. If we don't listen to our scientist, then as Darryl Hannah said in Blade Runner, "We are stupid, and we will die."
beldapriest 2 years ago 2
YOU ARE A MORON,,,maybe u shld not selectively listen to only the ones u agree with,,,and remember these words when yr kids are all retarded and yr destitute
candiceevans1 2 years ago
Candice,
Alex Jones is where you get your information??? No wonder.
He's an entertainer. Even he doesn't believe the things he says. He's just someone who knows that America's appetite for paranoid theories is insatiable.
Find credible sources.
ReliableInsider 2 years ago
Darryl Hannah LMFAO what a waste of time LOL
newsgodaz 2 years ago
What credibility does Darryl Hannah have on this debate?
Jaimetud 2 years ago
WHAT ABOUT CLIMAGATE ??? Menmake climachange is pure Propaganda !
americanfirst31 2 years ago
Global warming is a total scam, stupid followers.
EpicSlug 2 years ago
EpicSlug,
Science is not a scam. It's a process of gathering and assessing data.
If you have doubts, collect more data, but you can't collect data forever. At some point, you have to act.
The world has decided to act. It's no different from washing dishes, boring . . . but necessary.
ReliableInsider 2 years ago
Please can you explain why in the last great ice age the CO2 ppm (parts per million) level was 8 times higher than it is today?
Can you also please explain to me the medieval warm period... there were no cars or planes around then.
Also can you explain why if global warming and the green house effect is sooo bad why politicians only want to regulate CO2 and not other green house gases like methane and nitrous oxide? 1 gram of methane is 22 times as damaging as 1gram of CO2 even the IPCC agree.
EpicSlug 2 years ago
EpicSlug,
It does not matter what the politicians or the right-wing radio personalities or the oil companies say.
All that matters is what the scientists say.
They have taken carbon dioxide levels during the last ice age and the Medieval warm period into account and they have decided that carbon dioxide we are releasing is causing global warming which is leading to shifts in wind patterns and significant climate change all around the world.
ReliableInsider 2 years ago
Science itself is the debate.
I assume you know that you can't take three data points and make a case from that alone. Scientists who devote their entire lives to analyzing all available data are comfortable that the scientific consensus is correct.
What are your credentials?
If you want to get a degree in climate science and do a study, go for it. Perhaps ten years of study will lead you to the conclusion my barber had reached already.
ReliableInsider 2 years ago
If they take out the methane and nitrous oxide the sun would burn you to a crisp because the ozone would collapse....I'm not a scientist,just using simple logic.
DTMTroy 2 years ago
Is there some other group you propose that is more qualified to have answered this question than climate scientists?
Should we just leave it up to the oil company and the tobacco company executives and the right-wing politicians who work for them to analyze the data?
ReliableInsider 2 years ago
the climate scientists that are on the UN Payroll are dirty and many of the 1500 scientists say they were never consulted and do not agree that climate change is man made,,,the climate cools and heats up in cycles... this is an attempt to rob us blind please look ninto the climate gate emails and read them ,,,scientists have been ruining anyone who disagrees w/them and even journals that publish materials contrary to their myth,,the oil companies are behind this they are trading carbon credits
candiceevans1 2 years ago
With all respect due a stranger, answer the question.
What group is more qualified to do science than scientists? Conspiracy theorists who put up a webpage?
ReliableInsider 2 years ago
Youtube climate change sceptic or climate change supporter ?
Realjhad 2 years ago
All due respect...Darryl fucking Hannah?
terpis 2 years ago
Celebrities make important issues, and matters of life and death, more fun and more accessible.
They generate buzz in the room. The drier the issue, the more necessary they are.
ReliableInsider 2 years ago
I wonder if they will debate Al Gores false statements ( his latest was actually yesterday in a speech he said data from Dr. [Wieslav] Maslowski has the Arctic Caps melting away within 5 years, the Dr. has completely denied ever saying this), Hacked Emails (Climate-gate) that shows everything is based on fake data to keep scienetists in their governmnet grants, or the Fact that the Planet is actually cooling not getting warmer.
All this is is a political agenda to "spread the weatlh"!
MrLetfreedomring 2 years ago
so will you be debating on all sides, or just following CNN main news channel, and not cover the fact that climate change is a natural things, the fact that the earth has not warmed in the last 10 years, will you mention the medieval warm period, and the fact that we are heading for a cool period? Oh and will anyone mention the emails from the CRU, NASA's data and the UK met office? will someone mention that the models used do not add up to real time data as shown by many top scientists of today
neo58421964 2 years ago
neo58421964,
If you believe in science itself, and your comment suggests that you do, why do you have so little faith in scientists?
The consensus among climate scientists is that humanity is changing the temperature of the atmosphere and that it's having devastating effects already all around the globe.
Get your science from academies of science, not from right-wing politicians and the oil industry.
Science operates by consensus.
ReliableInsider 2 years ago
Climatologist have dealt with this issue and "common sense" has nothing to do with assessing scientific observations that often go against the assembly of prejudices, cultural mythology and utter bullshit that common sense is, also, names and creds, or gtfo.
GoldRainGirl 2 years ago
FIRST!
Greeb17 2 years ago
grats, dont know why so many people hate when people "first".
WolfRester 2 years ago