OOP isn't that much more complex than procedural. It is just another layer.. so, bunching procedures/functions up, calling the bnch an object, and calling each procedure/function, a method. Then you just have natural comcepts that follow from it.. like static variables, instance variables, and the fact that objects are variable types..
First! Another simple explanation for a subject complex for most. Include me, I am not a Java programmer, but I know the tedium of the waterfall model.
This is so cool, but im not ganna use it lol
xXCrypticalCodexX 1 month ago
After a minute or so the commentary becomes redundant. As in: I GET IT ALREADY.
Maarttttt 2 years ago
It is a great video. Very useful
TLVnextyear 2 years ago
SO COOL!!!
t3t011 3 years ago
I really appreciate every time you make a video on something useful and free.
Thank you very much
Joemafroush 3 years ago 4
If Java and OOP weren't so damn complicated you wouldn't need all these tools to make sense of it all.
WorkingLeo 3 years ago
@WorkingLeo
the tools are for procedural languages as well.
OOP isn't that much more complex than procedural. It is just another layer.. so, bunching procedures/functions up, calling the bnch an object, and calling each procedure/function, a method. Then you just have natural comcepts that follow from it.. like static variables, instance variables, and the fact that objects are variable types..
jameshanley40 1 year ago
are there similar softwares for different languages?
Ju5tATh0ught 3 years ago
This is the empirical software engineering. Sometimes it sux! The botomline is trust your intuition when you think it is necessary.
michaeldeng1981 4 years ago
First! Another simple explanation for a subject complex for most. Include me, I am not a Java programmer, but I know the tedium of the waterfall model.
CoCreatr 4 years ago