Peter Jennings, building melted, ABC, 20:22, 9/11

[YacovMenashe]

Yimach Shemo to that Jew hater!

[Ondelendo]

I am very happy to see the vidoe after you give this Peter Jennings, building melted

[bebeheuy]

Good, I like that you share this video Peter Jennings, building melted, I wish success always

[AntoMelta]

Nice Video Peter Jennings, building melted, ABC That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You

[imegatrone]

Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing Peter Jennings building melted, ABC

[revolution09pac]

one of the greats, Mr. Jennings.

[GEMENI76]

Miss u Peter...

[john9276]

R.I.P. Peter. Thanks for being there for us on 9/11.

[guy2008rules]

And people like O'reilly are still alive. wow.

[MarcusLeepapi]

I miss Peter Jennings a lot....I remember this event as well... I came home from my trip that night before this event occured..

[PLAZOLAS1]

We miss you, Peter!

[LBjim]

Peter Jennings was a genius and great journalist. May he rest in peace..

[kasteman1]

A Boeing 757 carrying 10,000 gallons of fuel with tremendous momentum slams into a building, partially vaporizing load bearing walls across 8 floors, with a blowtorch of fuel and debris spraying all the way through to the other side.

Don't get me wrong, I do believe in some top-secret government conspiracies, but not this one. I don't write off conspiracy theorists with hate, they have their legitimate reasons. I just choose what I think is logically the better explanation.

[TheCraiger1234]

@kasteman1 did you see the dirt whole in penn that is the shape of a plane but no fires but the towers fell under an hour hmmmmm????

[ederrick987]

Peter Jennings was one of the last great anchor of the modern era. RIP

[Fartingbellybutton]

I Can't Believe He went back to smoking because of 9/11.

[Brianwhittaker23]

AroundSun...You keep making shit up as you go.Do you work for the government?I bet you do,I bet you collect trash for them!!!Trash as in where you get your evidence from yo.You said a plane caused wtc7 to fall.I'm done with ANY ad EVERY comment you add here or anywhere else.You are making shit up as you go and that is the problem we had from the start of this shit.Learn more on what your preaching kid

[xxKYLExGxx]

I was 9 years old. I'll never forget we were watching Peter Jennings in my 4th grade class.

[spyder79z]

Peter Jennings one of the best in the business!

[lazyfreedom98]

T

H

E

R

M

I

T

E

[AroundSun]

@lazyfreedom98 Keep watching jesse venturas shows

[lazyfreedom98]

O B A M A T H E R M I T E

[lazyfreedom98]

Thermite H E R M I T E O B A M A Spell Check

[Brianwhittaker23]

How can the weight that was already on top fo the building add more weight while burning?Only weight added to the building was the weight of the plane and its contents.Im guessing that alot(ALOT) of the glass and furniture were burnt or ejected on impact.That would lessen the weight of the building?I dont see that bein the cause sorry.

[AroundSun]

@Brianwhittaker23 A massive airliner knocked out structural support and fires were raging from full airplane fuel tanks melting away at the building. This was not some office fire.

[peacemaker083]

@AroundSun The WTC buildings were hard target's. They could only be brought down by shaped charges. Those two airliners did not bring the WTC buildings down. The WTC was attacked in 93 by a bomb in the basement. The FBI were involved in that & it is a fact. Those buildings were made to stand up to hurricane force winds. It was NOT an airliner that brought them down.

[AroundSun]

@peacemaker083 You're just a moron and you are gullible. The FBI was responsible and coordinated the 93 attack? Oh yea? Where is your evidence. You have none. If you did you would be on the cover of every newspaper dumbass. Airliners are not hurricane force winds dumbass. They are faster, and they burn forever. The building was designed in the 70's to stand a IMPACT of a 727 not a 737 with full tanks. THe buildings fell where they were hit. You guys are all just tin foil hat wearers

[peacemaker083]

@AroundSun Well..you asked for evidence. Hope you like to read. This information is freely available. I like to deal with truth alone. A real patriot named William Cooper has helped in educating me. As he often would say, "Read everything, listen to everyone, but believe nothing unless you can prove it through your own research. "

What happened on 9-11-01 required yrs of planning.

[peacemaker083]

Well seeing how I can't post links on the comment's, I'll send it to you. I'll also upload the text to a site so others can read what I have to say. I deal with truth alone. Don't attack the messenger. You attack me because what I claim and others before me claim is so amazing that it requires good evidence & this evidence does exist, is freely available and spans through many years.

[peacemaker083]

@peacemaker083 Anyone that wants to read the information I messaged AroundSun can visit my profile and read it all on my channel.

[peacemaker083]

@AroundSun btw, I was only using an example of how tough the buildings were. You didn't see that because you have been conditioned by the media and government lies. You, like me and most of everyone were caught up in the shock of it all. Those behind the new world order orchestrated this attack. This attack hit American's where they'd be vulnerable into giving up freedom's in the name of safety.

[Brianwhittaker23]

@AroundSun Dude no airplane fuel hit wtc7 lol.Next

[AroundSun]

@Brianwhittaker23 airplane fuel landed on vessey street and flaming fueld on top of buildings further north...the fact that you losers think explosives are involved just to add to the story are fucking insane. How can you be so stupid and gullible?

[BLAGASPANTS]

@AroundSun WTC 7 you stupid, gullible little prick.

[Brianwhittaker23]

@AroundSun Well sir you jsut reported something entierly different then what the commission reported.So how did you get evidence that the governement didnt have or give us?They said something(piece of steel)i belive was their answer.Ripped thru the building and cut a supply line that fed Diesel Fuel to back up generator!Thats the offical story i read.So please tell me how you came up with airplane fuel leaked down 100 stories and across the street without catching fire in the explosion?Plz?

[AroundSun]

@Brianwhittaker23 Really? You must be one shitty researcher if you haven't found out that fuel went down the elevator shaft and exploded in the lobby as well as several other elevators exits. The firefighters said it looked like a plane hit the lobby, and there were people on the first floor walking around on fire with their skin falling off shortly after the plane hit.

[Brianwhittaker23]

@AroundSun We are talking about wtc7...You have no clue wtf you are talking about.You are saying something different then the governement too!You should get with the commission on this and between all of you dipshits you could maybe come up with the same lie!!!Im done talking to you since you are some one sided with your sight!!!PLane hit lobby?We know was only 2 planes.That which hit lobby was a Bomb!!!We know that only 2 planes hit the towers.SO had to be a bomb in the lobby.Thanks for helpin

[AroundSun]

@Brianwhittaker23 We should stop speaking since you are probably like ten years old, relying on youtube videos as evidence. You retarded truthers motto is "I got it!"...Well guess what, ya don't! Thats the thing with any conspiracy theory...

[Brianwhittaker23]

@AroundSun Your making shit up kid as you go.Read the witness reports of what happen.Then tell me who you belive(the people that was there during all this shit)witness's or your government?Your retarded motto is that 2 fires brought down 3(THREE) buildings lol.Are you fucking kidding me?3 STEEL buildings fell because of fire lol.YOur a fucking idiot sir and sry but that is as nice as i can state the fact!!!

[AroundSun]

@Brianwhittaker23 That's funny, you don't have your little tinfoil hat on in your profile picture. Nobody is listening to you guys, get a life. I don't care how big your dopey truth movement gets. Bunch of low lives with zero credibility. You guys are going nowhere. Because you've got NOTHING!!

[SweepTheLegYo]

@Brianwhittaker23 Your post is incoherent. It doesn't lend a lot of credence to your wild theories. It makes you look foolish -- just letting you know.

[Brianwhittaker23]

@AroundSun all fuel was ignited on impact...If you havent read taht as the cause of the melted steel then where in the hell are you getting all your info?Explain to me why the firefighters ran right thru the fire in the lobby?Shouldnt the firemen have extinguish the fire in the lobby instead of running thru it towards the stairs and up them where the WITNESS's said the only fires were at?The Witness's said they heard a bomb in the lobby.Fire doesnt cause damage like a bomb.Firemen no the differe

[fatmanfiftythousand]

@Brianwhittaker23...because people were trapped in the upper floors?

Witnesses also said they heard car bombs in the street. It's called people panicking and not thinking straight. Simple logic can debunk every single one of your idiotic conspiracy theories.

[Brianwhittaker23]

@AroundSun Well fire alone doesnt work its way thru bricks or pavement so how did it get into wtc7????

[Brianwhittaker23]

@AroundSun No plane hit wtc7 you dipshit.You telling me that airplane fuel went down the eleatavor shaft.So now im made to belive that all the fuel in the planes that hit the towers wasnt ignited on impact,but some made its way down 100 stories and across the street into an Elevator Shaft before ignoiting again in wtc7?This is what you are telling us that happened to wtc7?The firemen that said the line feeding the back up generators were the cause of the wtc7 fires was wrong.but u know it all?

[lilvjdude]

Peter jennings was the best broadcaster ever, RIP

[mikeynyc]

i grew up with peter jennings delivering the nightly news. he was my favorite. RIP

[sibipihkur]

I never knew of Peter Jennings coz I live in Europe and we don't have ABC, but from the 9-11 videos hosted by Mr Jennnings, I'd say he's the greatest anchor I've ever seen on screen.

There something about him that makes you like him instantly.

RIP

[enrriqueiglesias00]

The rumor is that Barbara Olson might not be dead at all and is enjoying the good life in Europe around France. I wouldn't call it a great life though if you have to live in incognito for the rest of your life, but maybe with a new name, passport, a hair color change and possibly some plastic surgery, life can be just as great!

No disrespect if she truly died, but I 98% doubt it.

[enrriqueiglesias00]

Listen carefully, there are a few golden nuggets here! One of my favorite ones, where he is basically trying to convey this message: People don't be stupid and believe everything I have to read and report because is my job but "The heat ABOVE the crash, the heat ABOVE the crash site".... caused the building to collapse!

Also at the begining the inconsistency he finds of his "architect friend" claims of reporting a family member dead.

Many of his videos of 9/11 are full of messages like this

[bigmaxy07]

Quite simply. The jet fuel did not melt anything. So many people misunderstand this and think the claim is the steel turned molten. It's not. The fire weakened connections, welds, bolts etc. Steel under heat expands and moves. It behaves differently. Here, floors fell slowly until the load was too great. The explanation given in this video is correct. The floors fell inside slowly, out of view for an hour until the outer columns' buckling lengths were exceeded. Then the main collapse happened.

[dasturdly40]

Barbara OLSON never called TED her husband. TED was asked to provide phone records for proof. (heneverdid)Then the FBI has admitted during the trial of the 20th hijacker, She never made a call to her husband, HE LIED. She was the only person to make a call from that flight . Only one person out of about 50 made a call from a plane about to be flown into a building. In which they say the terrorists let them make calls. And the 1 call we supposedly knew about really never ever took place.

[dasturdly40]

FACT =Kerosene (jetfuel) cannot MELT steel.

[MeanGene79]

@dasturdly40 The steel did not melt, it was weakened. The word 'melt' never appeared in the official report.

[dasturdly40]

@MeanGene79 POOLS OF MOLTEN METAL WERE FOUND UNDER WTC 1,2,7. AND INCASE YOU WERENT AWARE OF THIS....NO PLANE HIT BUILDING 7. SINCE WE AGREE KEROSENE CANNOT MELT STEEL. THEN PLEASE EXPLAIN THE MOLTEN METAL IN ALL THREE CASES??? ALSO THE MOLTEN METAL POOLS WERENT IN THE "OFFICIAL REPORT". FOR OBVIOUS REASONS!!!! WHICH REPORT BY THE WAY...THE PANCAKE, INWARD BOWING/THERMAL EXPANSION/ TWO CONTRADICTORY REPORTS ON WTC7, NO OFFENSE BUT GET OUT OF HERE WITH THE OFFICIAL REPORT STUFF!!!

[MeanGene79]

@dasturdly40 Yeah, the main reason the molten metal wasn't mentioned is THERE WAS NONE! Quit making shit up.

[dasturdly40]

@MeanGene79 THERE ARE ABOUT 15 TESTIMONIALS OF PEOPLE WHO WERE AT GROUND ZERO WHO SAID THERE WAS!!!! RUDI GULLIANI SAID THERE WAS!!! YOU SAY THERE WASN'T, NEVERMIND WHY AM I DEBATING THIS WITH YOU!!!! IF YOU CLAIM TO NOT KNOW THAT, THAT TELLS ME ALL I NEED TO KNOW ABOUT YOU!!! PLEASE DONT REPLY BACK AND FIND A BETTER JOB!!!! LIKE TELEMARKETING!!!

[MeanGene79]

@dasturdly40 Do some research and you'll see the 'witnesses' who reported molten steel are dubious at best.

Oh never mind. You're a truther. You hate facts.

[dasturdly40]

@MeanGene79 TWO POINTS IDIOT!!!!!! 1) I TOLD YOUR DUMB ASS NOT TO REPLY TO ME 2) WHY WOULD SOME "OFFICIAL STORY BELIEVER" CHECK OUT SO CALLED "TRUTHER" PAGES ON YOUTUBE......LET ME GUESS YOUR PROBALY BEING PAID TO DO SO!!!!! IF YOUR SAYING YOU'VE DONE RESEARCH ON THE PEOPLE WHO SAID THERE WAS MOLTEN METAL YOUR ONLY FOOLING YOURSELF!!!! AFTER ALL IT WASNT IN THE "OFFICIAL REPORT", LIKE YOU SAID EARLIER!!! SINCE THATS YOUR NEW BIBLE, HOW DID YOU KNOW TO RESEARCH THEM!!! SHOOT YOURSELF PLEASE

[dasturdly40]

@MeanGene79 FOR ANYBODY ELSE KEEPING SCORE YOUVE LIED OR CONTRADICTED YOURSELF THREE TIMES!!!! THREE STRIKES YOUR OUT!!!! GO PLAY WITH THE OTHER KIDDIES!!! THE ONES THAT DONT KNOW WHAT THEIR TALKING ABOUT!!!!! I READ BOOKS PAL,... APPRENTLY YOU JUST READ BUMPER STICKERS!!!! I'VE RAISED 9 DIFFERENT POINTS AND ALL YOUVE SAID IS "THE STEEL WAS WEAKENED"!!!! IF IM THE "TRUTHER" GOOD....BETTER THAN BEING THE DUMBASS!!!! (THATS YOU, THOUGHT ID HELP YOU SINCE YOUVE BEEN HAVING A HARD TIME WITH THIS!)

[flourbiscuit76]

@dasturdly40

Holy heck-darn. You don't seem to know how to spell... well, much at all. And yet, "(you) read books, pal". Must be challenging. Anyway, let me guess: "THIS ISNT ENGISH CLASS KIDDIE!!!!!!!"

[dasturdly40]

@MeanGene79 AND IM SURE THE GROUND ZERO WORKERS HAD BETTER THINGS TO DO THAN TO LIE ABOUT THERE BEING MOLTEN METAL!!! YOU ARE PATHETIC, SUGGESTING SUCH THINGS THAT ARE OBVIOUS LIES!!! IF YOUVE BEEN SENT TO WATER DOWN THESE TOPICS, THEY NEED TO GIVE YOU BETTER TALKING POINTS!!! YOU AND SARAH PALIN!!! SORRY FOR THE NAME CALLING, BUT YOU ARE AN IDIOT AND YOU DONT FOOL ME!!! AT LAST COUNT THE NSA HAD OVER 500 PEOPLE DOING THE SAME SHIT YOUR TRYING TO DO. GET A NEW JOB FOR THE SECOND TIME!!!

[MeanGene79]

@dasturdly40 Two words: Anger management! LOL! Wow.

I never once said the ground zero workers were lying. They could have been mistaken about what they saw. I've yet to see a report showing how it was identified as 'molten steel'. As for being paid to research/debunk? No. I'm just interested in pointing out how stupid the conspiracy theories are concerning 9/11. I wouldn't call the official report my Bible, but it's a lot more believable than what conspiracy theorists are saying.

[dasturdly40]

@MeanGene79 IM NOT MAD , I JUST LOVE TYPING IN CAPS!!! TAKE CARE MEANEGENE79!!!!

[karrinne1]

@dasturdly40 jet fuel CAN SOFTEN steel enough to weaken it genius

[dasturdly40]

@karrinne1 SO WHERE DID THE POOLS OF MOLTEN METAL COME FROM THEN THAT TOOK ABOUT A MONTH TO STOP BEING RED HOT. POOLS OF MOLTEN METAL WERE FOUND UNDER WTC 1,2,7. AND INCASE YOU WERENT AWARE OF THIS....NO PLANE HIT BUILDING 7. SINCE WERE BOTH GENIUS APPRENTLY, AND WE AGREE KEROSENE CANNOT MELT STEEL. THEN PLEASE EXPLAIN THE MOLTEN METAL IN ALL THREE CASES???

[annettealex1]

miss you peter you are other one of canada's wonderful sons

[AndrewDeLong]

Simply put, there's no way that the amount of thermite needed to take out the 80th floor level structure could have been brought on either the planes or into the buildings themselves without someone noticing. You'd have to be a complete dumb ass to think otherwise. A thermite attack would have been aimed at the structures bases anyway, and from the video, we clearly see that they didn't fall from the base up, rather the top down. Themite conspiracy theorists need to start THINKING.

[runelord37]

nope , they had time they had cover and they had the buildings power shutoff mulitple times on different days all you have to do is use it wisely in strategic postions. buidlings dont buckle from heat and fall straight down. its bullshit, and its doesnt matter what load weight is. this is physics not playground arguements. im sorry your blind.

[AndrewDeLong]

@runelord37

Ok. From a physics perspective, exactly how much thermite would you need to cut through the support structure of even ONE of those towers, much less two? Oh, and from a logical POV, those towers were built to take a 747, I'll give you that, but they were NOT designed to take the heat from the jet fuel. The coupled impact and heat from those fires caused by the jets is what took those towers out. You're REALLY stretching it even saying that THE JETS WERE A DISTRACTION?! Yeah, no

[AndrewDeLong]

@runelord37

Continued. If you honestly think that THAT MUCH thermite could have been brought up to the EXACT levels at which the jets hit, without anyone noticing, you'd have to either be on crack, or on crack. I mean really, the heat from the jet fuel alone is enough to melt through the steel in those towers. The crackpot theory of thermite use is completely baseless. There is no tangible proof, there is no evidence, there is no supporting criteria of any kind, just unprovable theories.

[MonaRocks09]

he seemed like such a sweet, soft spoken, amazing person :(

[StefanoFan27]

R.I.P Peter Jennings.

[chillaxer1993]

@StefanoFan27 my mom had the privilege of meeting him when he came to KABC in LA

[habadaheeb]

haha! and you claim people arn't thinking!?

[ClownShadow1]

HAbadaheeb-adbado you are an asshole ! Stick some thermite up your stupid ass Bitch ! and dont forget your buddies and your mumma !

[inachu]

weeks later lots of metal was still red hot when removed in OPEN AIR.

Pure and simple fact of THERMITE in use.

[AndrewDeLong]

Sorry, but no. THERMITE burns way to quickly, much faster than most fuels. Not to mention that the amount of the material needed to melt through the supporting structure would have been colossal! More than enough to raise suspicion, be it gathered on an airliner, or within the building itself. You seem to forget that metal retains a lot of heat, and via convection, the heated open air metal would have been such due to the still inferno like heat below. No, thermite was not used here.

[runelord37]

poor analysis and incorrect. study this and listen to experts before you talk out your ass

[AndrewDeLong]

@runelord37

You honestly think that thermite was used in these attacks?! I'm once again sorry, but the supporting structures in those towers were massive. You really would have to be on crack to think that anyone could get that much thermite that high up into the towers to take them out. Plain and simple, it was a combination of the jet fuel and steadily burning fires, coupled with the impact of the event itself that took those towers out. The only one talking out his ass here is you.

[TheRisenstar]

@AndrewDeLong

try looking into nanothermitic explosives

[AndrewDeLong]

@TheRisenstar

Orrrrr.....and I know this is out there, so just try to follow my "logic" here....I could accept the fact that jet fuel burns well hot enough to melt through steel supports which were forged in the 1970's, and were never really made with the intent to withstand such temperatures. I could also point out that some key crew members who were involved in building the towers claimed that not every beam was insulated properly (or at all) thus allowing the burning fuel to run its course

[AndrewDeLong]

continued...

To assume that two jetliners flying into the WTC was nothing more than a distraction while some other material was used to take the buildings down is nothing short of ludicrous. I mean, that belongs right up there with the nut-jobs that are the 9-11 conspiracy theorists. Simply put, the planes hit the buildings. Coupled with THAT structural damage, the heat from the burning jet fuel either melted or softened the support beams enough to allow them to collapse in on themselves.

[TheRisenstar]

@AndrewDeLong

Couple of problems with your assumptions....

the jet fuel was spent at impact; remember the fireballs? Even the NISTA reports admit that... so all you have for fires are normal high rise office fires; there's been over 600 of them and none managed to soften the beams and cause a collapse. Study the WTC fires; did the sprinkler system work? YES

The fires didn't collapse anything... meanwhile, traces of nanothermitic explosives have proven what the real cause of collapse was.

[AndrewDeLong]

@TheRisenstar

1) show me proof that ALL of the jet fuel was spent upon impact. Kerosene, which is BASICALLY what jet fuel is, does not burn off instantly, I know, I've played with it many a time.

2) Show me this so called proof of nanothermic explosives. Does it hold up to academic scrutiny?

[TheRisenstar]

@AndrewDeLong Read the NIST reports. Jet fuel is super high grade kerosene; extremely flammable; the fireball is estimated at 1500 degrees F... how would some of the fuel not burn? Spent fuel does not burn twice.

try this: google: nano thermitic proof WTC demolition

it was published in a scientific journal

these are explosives, developed in a military lab in 1999.

[AndrewDeLong]

@TheRisenstar

What I'm saying is that the fuel would not all be consumed at once. It can burn at a constant rate. Given that each plane carries roughly 64,000 Gallons of fuel, you cannot possibly say all of it was used on impact.

As for your sources, I refuse to google them. You have made a claim, which is on you to back up with substantial evidence. Give me at least one solid source, and I will hear your argument out.

[TheRisenstar]

@AndrewDeLong jet fuel involved in an explosion does not "burn at a constant rate" ... an explosion consumed the jet fuel, the fireball was an open air explosion.

I can't make a Link in this forum, that's why I asked you to Google.

[AndrewDeLong]

@TheRisenstar

Actually, just put a space in between each word and replace the "." with (dot)....it's enough where I can copy it into my search bar and look up your info.

As for the jet fuel...64,000 gallons will not all go up at once. Witness ANY fuel based explosion...there is always some residual fuel left, which is why the fire does not stop after it has exploded.  Seriously, just look for any fuel based explosion video here on youtube, and you'll see what I mean.

[AndrewDeLong]

continued....

for a good example of how fuel will not burn out instantly, I refer you to this video "Raw Video: Explosion I 75 Tanker in Michigan"...it is the first one.

[TheRisenstar]

@AndrewDeLong most of the fuel was consumed in the fire ball, yes there was some that burned in the building, but NIST admitted 90% of the jet fuel was spent within the first ten minutes. Look at Tower Two fireball; it was outside the building, they flew the corner... Tower Two was not a very hot fire, maybe only 900 degrees F.

See if you can work this into an address: // 911 research (dot) wtc7 (dot) net / essays / thermite / explosive _ residues (dot) html

[AndrewDeLong]

@TheRisenstar

Interesting, and the science does hold up, in so far as the chemical analysis is concerned. But as far as the methodology by which the building would be coated with thermite, that is pure hypothesis. Further, is there actual evidence of melted steel (from the beams) or is there just thermite residue? If this is the case, nothing is proved against the common assertion that the burning fuel merely softened the steel structure to the point of collapse.

[TheRisenstar]

@AndrewDeLong It is called "nano" thermite because it is constructed at the molecular level... these are high tech explosives, especially designed for demolition; they were first built in American military labs in 1999... they can cut at high temps or they can act as charges... on 09/11 they did both.

09/11 was a military black op... the WTC towers were utterly blown to pieces; they had to be: every other floor was connected to a giant core with heavy steel beams... they were vertical trusses.

[AndrewDeLong]

@TheRisenstar

Again, you have at best circumstantial evidence to show that it was a "black op." There is no proof to show that any material was placed in several different buildings. Further, the question of contamination of the samples found is one that is NOT to be passed off lightly. 10 tons of thermite, despite ANY type of construction, is not something that is easily placed. No, I'm sorry, but the "inside job" theory has far too many holes for my personal acceptance of it.

[TheRisenstar]

@AndrewDeLong You are missing the distinction between plain thermite, used all over the world, and these nano thermitic explosives. Nobody had this stuff, I doubt anyone has it today, except the military. It isn't possible to "contaminate" the samples ... finding it, period, leads you directly to the sole source it came from... the top military labs on the planet. The radiation from these type explosives (atom by atom chain reaction) killed 40,000 clean up workers... ground zero disease.

[AndrewDeLong]

@TheRisenstar

"Ground Zero Disease" is commonly attributed to the asbestos released during the building's collapse, as well as other inherent toxins that are released upon the collapse of such massive structures. The chemical formula for the thermite you showed me is no different than the stuff I can make in my garage, the only difference being the size of the grains. Still, has evidence of steel melted by thermite been found (conclusively) to exist?

[TheRisenstar]

@AndrewDeLong The size of the grain, yep, that's the idea; these are specialized atomic explosives... which then gave off radiation poisoning. If ground zero disease was asbestos poisoning, there would have been thousands of lawsuits against the city of New York, because those laws already exist for asbestos clean up.

They used cutter explosives for the giant 4 inch thick footers that were sunk 80 feet into the bedrock, that left tons of evidence of steel melted by thermite... nano thermite.

[AndrewDeLong]

@TheRisenstar

Actually, if the asbestos was safely tucked away, there would be no need to clean it out of the building. Fact is, up until 2005, the local elementary and high schools in my town did not even START asbestos clean up. I can guarantee you, there are still standing buildings in NYC, which are currently in use, that have some level of sealed asbestos in them. As for the melted beams evidence, I again (politely) ask you for a source as to back up that assertion.

[TheRisenstar]

@AndrewDeLong The point was that Ground Zero disease (so named because the cause was unknown) was not asbestos poisoning, had it been asbestos poisoning, there are laws for asbestos clean up and lawsuits would have been in the thousands.

Are you asking for sources identifying the molten metal lying on bedrock for all three WTC buildings? That's widely published on the web... hey, here's a you tube video that touches on it...

9/11 Incontrovertible Proof the Government is Lying

[dasturdly40]

@AndrewDeLong I can direct you to a NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC PRODUCED VIDEO about 9/11 where you can clearly see flashes of lights cascading down floor by floor. tHEN THAT SAME TOWER COLLAPSES.. When theres evidence out there like that, and the squibs shooting out the sides of the towers 30 floors below the collapsing debri. IF you want to see the clip of it REPLY!!!

[dasturdly40]

@AndrewDeLong not trying to just trying to reply to all your comments!!! But I just got to say THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT HAS MORE SECRET SHIT ON ITS SHELVES, THEN WALMART HAS IN ITS STORE!!! Im sure youve probaly seen that future weapons show. Im sure our GOV could have another 10 of those shows.. We have no idea of what their working with Andrew. Does the fact the BUSH wanted to paint a military plane with UN colors, to be flown over IRAQ in hopes SADDAM would shot it down MEAN ANYTHING

[gripper61]

yeah, they were just sunning themselves, trying get a view. And they were jumping cause it looked like a cool thing to do. Right on, brother. It wasn't hot at all.

[cancanbiker]

@gripper61

what about the smoke? Don't you think the smoke was a bigger factor than the heat?