I just nid a cheaper weapon? The pistol and shoot the soilder's back taht carries the tank for flamable liquid for flamethrower? guess what happens to him? LOL I win~
Everything i saw in TV about american weapons and military tech apears improved in these russians videos from 70ties and 80ties. Fuck! These russians rock! They keep it very hiidden and quiet, not like egocentric and exotic americans.
Russia kills you, motherfucker.
By the way, the only contry who face the real devil army in this world, the best of the best nazi troopers. Americans only fought with kids and old people, and have troubles in the west front.
@AlbatrossDude Thank you for your words.Russia never killed sons and daughters.Russia is most magnanimous country on our planet.We never attack other countries.Russia constantly provoke to bad affairs, but Russia will think before answering three times, because we not idiots
No it aint, it's "When Trumpets Fade", bad ass old school movie of the battle of Hurtgen forest or something. It's got Timothy Oliphant in it, the guy in the newest die hard move
The world uses Soviet weapons because its the cheapest alternative on the market. You may have noticed how only poor third world countries use Soviet, while rich countries use Western
The reason some third world countries use Russian weapons was because of Politics. Just because the weapons are less expensive doesnt make them worse. AK-47 and other Russian weapons have proven to be some of the best weapons in the world
@rasko67 truth. it all comes down to preference in my opinion. what you train with, what your good with, and what you prefer. in some countries cases tho they have no choice of what weapon to use. everyone has it benefits and drawbacks no one is better. same with countries.. people need to get over this, i am better than your or this gun is better than that gun mentalities. these mentalities only lead to ethno and egocentrism and more wars. WHAT TRANCE SONG IS PLAYING IN THIS VIDEO ANYONE KNO!?
@PATRONSKiii: the ONLY situation in which accuracy isn't a problem for an AK is if you pile 500 people on top of eachother and spray wildly into the pile.
@PooPoo2U Blabla, not interesting, AK in 7.62 are accurate up to 300m, AK in 5.45 and 5.56 are up to 500m, as all 5.56 rifles. But in reality, you will not be able to engage beyond 150m with any non scoped rifle
@PATRONSKiii: what's this? a frenchman talking guns?
sorry, i don't accept gun-related opinions from people who never actually FIRE their guns. if you have any cheese-related opinions i'll be more than happy to entertain them though!
@PooPoo2U The frenchman fuck you morron, and I don't accept opinion of assholes as you. Come in my 93 dumbass, and we'll see if we don't have weapons, fucking morron. And yes we have best cheese your cheese is rubber plastic shit you are all obese, dying at 60 YO.
And to finish, all your shit on AK is from your washed brain, AK are superior to US crap, and equal to europeans masterpieces.
@PATRONSKiii: also, if you think AK is equal to "europeans masterpieces", you're a moron. it's a stamped metal piece of shit that's only real plus is its dependability.
in other words, you can fill the barrel with water, slam some mud on the breech and it'll still shoot JUST AS INACCURATELY AS IT DID TO BEGIN WITH!
@PooPoo2U I'm not talking of Chinese type 56, or egypt made Maadi copy of AKM, i'm not talking of AK-47 and AKM which were good in their times. I'm talking about current manufature of AK : AK74M, AK100 series. their construction include all technics of high quality make in west, AK74M is a top rifle, and outperforms M16a4 in all aspects, exept the modularity (which is really not necessary). AK74M can be fitted with various sights, and the GP25/30 as well.
@PATRONSKiii: oh i love when people say "something completely outdoes something EXCEPT"
if there's an "except" then it can't be "completely".
the m16 is more accurate, is designed to be more ergonomic to the hand, fires a more controllable round, IS MORE MODULAR, and most important it's used by a better-trained military.
@PooPoo2U MAIS TU LE FAIS EXPRES BORDELLLLLLLLLLLL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! T'es un casse couille de premiere toi !!!!! Alors selon toi le 5.45x39 est moins controlable que le 5.56x45 ??? MAIS JSUI BETE, je parle a un pauvre degénéré qui connait pas l'existance de l'AK74, qui a remplacer les AK en 7.62 dans toute l'europe de l'est et la russie depuis 30ans
BREF, Tu me soules, t'as rien capté ??? Jm'en balance c'est plus kiffant d'etre grossier en français,
@PATRONSKiii: yes, because obviously i would speak french. sorry, i speak 4 languages but french i'm afraid isn't one i ever wasted alot of time bothering with, as i feel you sound like you're trying to clear your throat the entire time you speak.
@PATRONSKiii: You can keep blathering on in french all you want and say whatever you like, but it doesn't change the fact that starting an argument in one language and finishing it in another makes YOU look like an idiot.
@PooPoo2U i like hove you tolk but i dont like what you tolk if you take a look of combat riful you must a system not just a an aspect and ak not a pice of shit
+ series like aek and so on but you right about acuracy of ak-47/74 m16a4 more acurate .... plz respect other people and ther opinions and some facts..
@Foenix47: I'll put this as simply as possible: yes, the AK is more reliable, but think how they're used: in squads.
take 5 men with m16s and 5 with AK47s. now, imagine that 2 of the m16s don't work and all the AKs do. in that case you'd still have 3 guns that are more accurate versus 5 "reliable" AKs that couldn't hit the side of a barn from any type of range.
these aren't person to person guns, they're assault rifles.
@Foenix47: again, horrible example. the mujahideen were equipped with old bolt action rifles and were fighting against russian spetsnaz equipped with AKs.
Also, after America equipped them with Stinger missiles and RPGs and the Chinese sold them old Type 56 Rifles, the Mujahideen then ran the Soviets out with a copy of their own weapons.
@PooPoo2U who sey it shit to you ? USA gave them a lot of ther m16 but mostly they use ak47/74 USSR mostly made becouse of real big potential ,Chinese ak Polish and so on is crap of mettal !
+ you realy think thet USSR have just specnaz ther ? it is real few groope not an army
@Foenix47: Did I say there were only spetsnaz in Russia? No. Were the largest mass of the Russian forces who the mujihadeen fighting against Spetsnaz? Yes, because they were the best-trained to deal with paramilitary activities, which most regular armies aren't as well-trained or equipped to deal with.
@PooPoo2U sory for thet but you dont have information in Afganistan 90%+ of all units are just regular infantry.... but valantiars free will mans. spetcnaz = special forses = elite for special operations only... of in Vietnam Usa have only Delta ?
@PooPoo2U sory for thet but you dont have information in Afganistan 90%+ of all units are just regular infantry.... but valantiars free will mans. spetcnaz = special forses = elite for special operations only... of in Vietnam Usa have only Delta ? or seals
Have you ever seen what a .50 or bomb can do to someone. War is hell. I wonder sometimes what is better, a quick, brutal war which solves the conflict, or a slow, "nice" one where people die decade after decade.
The falmethrower is a suprisingly effective weapon in urban environments. Yes, they are painful, and horrible. They can also take down tanks, just flame the thing and it will be a walk-in oven.
actually a flamethrower is a very efficeint weapon but unfortunately it is the design that is flawed. with a better design it would be in common use for many reasons
he also mentions the dresden terror when allies-us, britain bombed dresden with fire bombs, that killed over 135 000 civilians!!! talk about a genocide..
Haha, good luck with that. Shooting flamethrower packs and an explosion following is highly unlikely. Most of the time, either the propellent or fuel would just spray out. Once again, thank you Hollywood!
barbarian???? in war you do what ever the fuck you have to to win!!! do you know about the Massacre of Stalingrad?? until you know what the germans did, you are an idoit
flame throwes don't seem to be used much on the battlefields anymore...I don't know why cuz they make great close support/bunker cleaning weapons. No matter what latest tech you have, nothing scares the shit out of anyone more than a big ball of fire.
this has to be the worse possible way to die in a combat situation. I mean if you think getting shot is bad, imagine slowlly burning to death. This and mustard gas are possiblly the most terrifying weapons of WW1 and WW2.
He just said about his Grandfather in ww2 beinf a guy who used a flamethrower for the nazi's, so you tell me at the time that most soldiers in the german army didnt give a fuck about hitler, sure
the hell are u talking about? ur just racist, the german army is made of mostly ppl who dont even care of hitler or nazis, they're just fighting for their country.
both the flammenwerfer 35 & the red army issue flamethrower both had a tendancy to explode. my friends grandfather was flamethrower operator in ww2 for the nazi, his flamethrower backdrafted on him and left horrible burn scars on his face and body. he past away 3 years ago. my friend said he used to have horrible memories of burning people alive. i guess he could never forget their screams.
My god... Talk about nightmares. Imagine being conscripted (or enlisting) in the army and they tell you that your job is going to be to burn people alive. Jesus f-ng christ, I didn't know that guy (the grandfather) but fuck him, he deserved the nightmares.
I mean, I'd rather go to jail than operate a fucking flamethrower - in fact, I'd rather be burned than operate a flamethrower.
По моему вторая часть полное гонево...
viperrus 1 week ago
Close
captions or anyone who can translate what he's saying @ 2:19-3:17 would be helpful! Thank you!
TPDManiacXC626 1 month ago
woo england tank video in ww1 rarelly no !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TATARSTAN59500 4 months ago in playlist Autres vidéos de 01e9
7:30 Luxery rusian house
MusicQcArtist 7 months ago
шайтан труба, шайтан орган )))))
MaksimovLugansk 7 months ago
Spetznaz take no prizoners comrades!
WirSindZuGeil 9 months ago 2
In Soviet Russia Fire Burns You
Umbecka 1 year ago
:-D Yaaaaay War. Cool Video.
hanson666999 1 year ago
nice hippie killer
nightshade288 1 year ago
4:09, that's why you wear eye protection
marcusjack 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
rofl russian technology is such a joke.
huntman1412 1 year ago
In war there is no second place
time2blowstuffup 1 year ago
I would love to be killed by a flamethrower
Nunogra 1 year ago
I'm laughing my ass off at Americans saying that flamethrowers are inhumane while their nation freely uses napalm cluster munitions in Afghanistan
Grow the fuck up, war is where you kill the other guy before he kills you, mercy or fairness doesn't apply in any fashion
adrastea99 1 year ago 14
@adrastea99 I'm American and i think the same thing. I don't see how they are inhumane.
7dmtuk87 2 months ago
Really guys flamethrowers are not human nobody wants to burn better shoot him like a man
FreezE322 1 year ago
US airforce murderd 150,000 Tokyo residents in one night of fire bombing alone!
tropickman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tropickman u know if u say "US airforce murderd 150,000 residents in one night of fire bombing alone!" thats like WOW!!!
-but if u put Tokyo (1943-45) ur should be like oh.... WOODEN HOUSES...
u blow one down others go chainburnin (domino effect)
-so thats not very impressing
PsyLiq 1 year ago
@tropickman Well, how many civilians, captured soldiers and interned civilians were murdered by the Japanese, either by direct war moves or in camps?
hans2406 11 months ago
In Soviet Russia, flame throws YOU!
U2OS 1 year ago 6
@U2OS
you killed me with this one....
Acodin144 1 year ago
Only in Russia do you show actual footage of guys on fire from flamethowers in WW2
DracoMalfoy87 1 year ago
ak is for pussies, g3 is for men
Grenadierer 1 year ago
can i roast a chicken with that shit
TELORINODELHOYO 1 year ago
@TELORINODELHOYO emm i think that yes why not :D
FreezE322 1 year ago
flame throwers are cool but as far as war goes, they are actually declared inhumane
spamuel44 1 year ago
I just nid a cheaper weapon? The pistol and shoot the soilder's back taht carries the tank for flamable liquid for flamethrower? guess what happens to him? LOL I win~
RichardGold8 1 year ago
Everything i saw in TV about american weapons and military tech apears improved in these russians videos from 70ties and 80ties. Fuck! These russians rock! They keep it very hiidden and quiet, not like egocentric and exotic americans.
Russia kills you, motherfucker.
By the way, the only contry who face the real devil army in this world, the best of the best nazi troopers. Americans only fought with kids and old people, and have troubles in the west front.
AlbatrossDude 1 year ago 5
@AlbatrossDude I agree 100% with you, the Soviets/Russia fucked the Nazis up the ass during WW2
T3kozRockz 1 year ago
@AlbatrossDude Thank you for your words.Russia never killed sons and daughters.Russia is most magnanimous country on our planet.We never attack other countries.Russia constantly provoke to bad affairs, but Russia will think before answering three times, because we not idiots
RussiaNOTbad 1 year ago
we dont need no water, let the mother f*ckers burn!!!
tHaH4x0r 1 year ago
IM ON MOTHER F****** FIRE!!!!!!!!
1210djy 1 year ago
i beriki ba destruksi di arschloski
dersalaris 2 years ago
Lol let's burn some fashists
Scoutrussp7 2 years ago
Need a light? Let's burrrn.
alchemist889 2 years ago 4
youv got my attention
mastercheif892 1 year ago
Полезное и нужное оружие для "убеждения" жидо-америкосов, которые иначе ничего не понимают.
vlad5548 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fucking russian bitches...they didn't make black/white movies..it's fucking red/white zomggggggggggggggggggg!!!
vocko1 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA nice hahahahahahaha
poofdude 2 years ago
hay you know what your a bastard
brettsworld99 2 years ago
=OOOOO why?
vocko1 2 years ago
he is just a troll
reven676 2 years ago
why??because the communistic bitches killed my grandparents so i hate them?
vocko1 2 years ago
that was years ago! get over it!
brettsworld99 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@vocko1
wh was your grand parents ?
nazis ???
FUCK them...
i wish i could give them the live back ...
and than take it xDDDD
again and again
hitler was your mom
SibirianHusky 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@vocko1
yes RED ... the collour of blood..
they take it from enemys... and lil kids like you ^^
kids blood tastes very sweet and its fresh
u know
drip drop... slice
SibirianHusky 2 years ago
@vocko1
shutUp asshole
andreyko1907 2 years ago
No it aint, it's "When Trumpets Fade", bad ass old school movie of the battle of Hurtgen forest or something. It's got Timothy Oliphant in it, the guy in the newest die hard move
blairpio 2 years ago
1:02 it is from band of brothers heh
ww2footage 2 years ago
come again?
daf867 2 years ago
i don't speak or know whatever this language is but im pretty sure those tanks were british in the begining
laxkid922 2 years ago 2
It's Russian. I don't understand it, but I can hear the differences in the words.
Vaskadar 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
F@g white americans
nepalihercules 2 years ago
Seriously this only irritating to listen to, just wants me to punch the guy talking in the face.
Znitso 2 years ago
ага "труба".
titanic19 2 years ago
sowieckie gawno
1944kam21 2 years ago
Thats why the world uses " Sowieckie" weapons, but you wouldn't know better cause your a dumb polack
rasko67 2 years ago
stf
1944kam21 2 years ago
The world uses Soviet weapons because its the cheapest alternative on the market. You may have noticed how only poor third world countries use Soviet, while rich countries use Western
Fonveh 2 years ago
Chinese weapons anyone?
nepalihercules 2 years ago
The reason some third world countries use Russian weapons was because of Politics. Just because the weapons are less expensive doesnt make them worse. AK-47 and other Russian weapons have proven to be some of the best weapons in the world
rasko67 2 years ago 71
@rasko67 truth. it all comes down to preference in my opinion. what you train with, what your good with, and what you prefer. in some countries cases tho they have no choice of what weapon to use. everyone has it benefits and drawbacks no one is better. same with countries.. people need to get over this, i am better than your or this gun is better than that gun mentalities. these mentalities only lead to ethno and egocentrism and more wars. WHAT TRANCE SONG IS PLAYING IN THIS VIDEO ANYONE KNO!?
cockfight420 1 year ago
@rasko67 the ak 47 is the real WMD
SmrtJugoslaviji 1 year ago
@rasko67 I agree with you 100%. Russians have proven to have
the best Anti-aircraft, Anti-tank, and Rocket Launchers in the world. Its just that the
people who usually use Russians weapons are undertrained and poorly led.
samuraispirit88 1 year ago
@rasko67 Very tru the only thing about the ak is its accuracy other than that its a very good weapon bvut i like the m16 for personel reasons
LastRealSamurai 1 year ago
@LastRealSamurai no accuracy is not a problem for ak, ak as perfectly accurate if used correctly and in the range they have to be used.
PATRONSKiii 1 year ago 2
@PATRONSKiii: the ONLY situation in which accuracy isn't a problem for an AK is if you pile 500 people on top of eachother and spray wildly into the pile.
dependable? sure. accurate? hardly...
PooPoo2U 1 year ago
@PooPoo2U Blabla, not interesting, AK in 7.62 are accurate up to 300m, AK in 5.45 and 5.56 are up to 500m, as all 5.56 rifles. But in reality, you will not be able to engage beyond 150m with any non scoped rifle
PATRONSKiii 1 year ago
@PATRONSKiii: what's this? a frenchman talking guns?
sorry, i don't accept gun-related opinions from people who never actually FIRE their guns. if you have any cheese-related opinions i'll be more than happy to entertain them though!
PooPoo2U 1 year ago
@PooPoo2U The frenchman fuck you morron, and I don't accept opinion of assholes as you. Come in my 93 dumbass, and we'll see if we don't have weapons, fucking morron. And yes we have best cheese your cheese is rubber plastic shit you are all obese, dying at 60 YO.
And to finish, all your shit on AK is from your washed brain, AK are superior to US crap, and equal to europeans masterpieces.
PATRONSKiii 1 year ago
@PATRONSKiii: lol, the ak is superior to US crap?
i suppose that's why in the middle east AKs are so easy to find, yet some of them would still rather just throw rocks.
PooPoo2U 1 year ago
@PATRONSKiii: also, if you think AK is equal to "europeans masterpieces", you're a moron. it's a stamped metal piece of shit that's only real plus is its dependability.
in other words, you can fill the barrel with water, slam some mud on the breech and it'll still shoot JUST AS INACCURATELY AS IT DID TO BEGIN WITH!
PooPoo2U 1 year ago
@PooPoo2U I'm not talking of Chinese type 56, or egypt made Maadi copy of AKM, i'm not talking of AK-47 and AKM which were good in their times. I'm talking about current manufature of AK : AK74M, AK100 series. their construction include all technics of high quality make in west, AK74M is a top rifle, and outperforms M16a4 in all aspects, exept the modularity (which is really not necessary). AK74M can be fitted with various sights, and the GP25/30 as well.
PATRONSKiii 1 year ago
@PATRONSKiii: oh i love when people say "something completely outdoes something EXCEPT"
if there's an "except" then it can't be "completely".
the m16 is more accurate, is designed to be more ergonomic to the hand, fires a more controllable round, IS MORE MODULAR, and most important it's used by a better-trained military.
PooPoo2U 1 year ago
@PooPoo2U MAIS TU LE FAIS EXPRES BORDELLLLLLLLLLLL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! T'es un casse couille de premiere toi !!!!! Alors selon toi le 5.45x39 est moins controlable que le 5.56x45 ??? MAIS JSUI BETE, je parle a un pauvre degénéré qui connait pas l'existance de l'AK74, qui a remplacer les AK en 7.62 dans toute l'europe de l'est et la russie depuis 30ans
BREF, Tu me soules, t'as rien capté ??? Jm'en balance c'est plus kiffant d'etre grossier en français,
SUR CE, ADIEU DUCON
PATRONSKiii 1 year ago
@PATRONSKiii: yes, because obviously i would speak french. sorry, i speak 4 languages but french i'm afraid isn't one i ever wasted alot of time bothering with, as i feel you sound like you're trying to clear your throat the entire time you speak.
PooPoo2U 1 year ago
@PooPoo2U T STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOK MAOOOOON mais tu va pas me piqué, haha bolosse, au fait, j'ai dis adieu, ça veut dire adieu, pas aurevoir.
PATRONSKiii 1 year ago
@PATRONSKiii: You can keep blathering on in french all you want and say whatever you like, but it doesn't change the fact that starting an argument in one language and finishing it in another makes YOU look like an idiot.
PooPoo2U 1 year ago
@PooPoo2U " it's used by a better-trained military." Colombians?
corporacionmonstruo 1 year ago
@PooPoo2U i like hove you tolk but i dont like what you tolk if you take a look of combat riful you must a system not just a an aspect and ak not a pice of shit
+ series like aek and so on but you right about acuracy of ak-47/74 m16a4 more acurate .... plz respect other people and ther opinions and some facts..
Foenix47 1 year ago
@Foenix47: I'll put this as simply as possible: yes, the AK is more reliable, but think how they're used: in squads.
take 5 men with m16s and 5 with AK47s. now, imagine that 2 of the m16s don't work and all the AKs do. in that case you'd still have 3 guns that are more accurate versus 5 "reliable" AKs that couldn't hit the side of a barn from any type of range.
these aren't person to person guns, they're assault rifles.
PooPoo2U 1 year ago
@PooPoo2U then read memoris of USA soldiers in vietnam about ak.....
but you know a thing thet call a cover of a bulets (territory) 5 ak can make more supresive fire...
but 3 m16 thet more acqarat but it dont gave a ultimate adventage to m16 ,new ak aqrat to ..
sory for bed lang..
Foenix47 1 year ago
@Foenix47: I'll tell you one particular fact I remember about Vietnam:
American casualties: 361.8K approximately.
NVA casualties: 1.1 million.
If you want a historical account of which gun is superior, Vietnam is hardly the benchmark I'd use.
PooPoo2U 1 year ago
@PooPoo2U ok in afganistan USSR lost near 10000-40000
enemy losisys near 2milion
Foenix47 1 year ago
@Foenix47: again, horrible example. the mujahideen were equipped with old bolt action rifles and were fighting against russian spetsnaz equipped with AKs.
Also, after America equipped them with Stinger missiles and RPGs and the Chinese sold them old Type 56 Rifles, the Mujahideen then ran the Soviets out with a copy of their own weapons.
PooPoo2U 1 year ago
@PooPoo2U who sey it shit to you ? USA gave them a lot of ther m16 but mostly they use ak47/74 USSR mostly made becouse of real big potential ,Chinese ak Polish and so on is crap of mettal !
+ you realy think thet USSR have just specnaz ther ? it is real few groope not an army
Foenix47 1 year ago
@Foenix47: Did I say there were only spetsnaz in Russia? No. Were the largest mass of the Russian forces who the mujihadeen fighting against Spetsnaz? Yes, because they were the best-trained to deal with paramilitary activities, which most regular armies aren't as well-trained or equipped to deal with.
PooPoo2U 1 year ago
@PooPoo2U sory for thet but you dont have information in Afganistan 90%+ of all units are just regular infantry.... but valantiars free will mans. spetcnaz = special forses = elite for special operations only... of in Vietnam Usa have only Delta ?
Foenix47 1 year ago
@PooPoo2U sory for thet but you dont have information in Afganistan 90%+ of all units are just regular infantry.... but valantiars free will mans. spetcnaz = special forses = elite for special operations only... of in Vietnam Usa have only Delta ? or seals
Foenix47 1 year ago
@Foenix47 We lost about 15.000 Soldiers there. But we managed to take a lot Mujahideen out.
SovjetPhoenix 1 year ago
@PATRONSKiii "But in reality, you will not be able to engage beyond 150m with any non scoped rifle" good point here,are you really from usa ?
corporacionmonstruo 1 year ago
What does that mean?
rasko67 2 years ago
sure. but they win a war for us so it's ok for me.
titanic19 2 years ago
Шайтан-труба - "S H M E L"
technoswitch 2 years ago 3
wtf are they saing
checthisshitout 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Such an ugly language. It's horrible.
Stickeyjam 2 years ago
your an idiot
Sum0nelse 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't have an, "an idiot". Good try, better luck next time. Twat.
Stickeyjam 2 years ago
burning nazi's is fun
zx6rtt 2 years ago
Шайтан-труба, нашальника :)
MATADOR694 2 years ago 6
ajajajaj xD
berkut2006 2 years ago
Lol bbq krauts
TsarSamuil 2 years ago
range? 1000 meters? as if it could fire 1km
loftsy69 2 years ago
rpo "schmel" - only 600 m
tos-1 " buratino" (russian pinokkio xD ) - about 10 km
originalreal 2 years ago 4
the TOS-1, effective range is: 500 - 3500 m (5473828 yds)
TillLindmann 2 years ago
nice! it comes with a bipod....
Desoxyri 2 years ago
Why do russians think everying that explodes or catches fire is thermobaric? Argh. Shit's been going on since the MOAB childishness.
Vansain 2 years ago
I blame it on translation
Treblaine 2 years ago
Comment removed
fandaal 2 years ago
Таковы некоторые странные оружия. Страшно!
PAULBLUNTZER 2 years ago
1:05 is from a WWII movie.
Petto84 2 years ago
Have you ever seen what a .50 or bomb can do to someone. War is hell. I wonder sometimes what is better, a quick, brutal war which solves the conflict, or a slow, "nice" one where people die decade after decade.
LSDetroit 2 years ago 5
The falmethrower is a suprisingly effective weapon in urban environments. Yes, they are painful, and horrible. They can also take down tanks, just flame the thing and it will be a walk-in oven.
cookiemaster888 2 years ago 5
actually a flamethrower is a very efficeint weapon but unfortunately it is the design that is flawed. with a better design it would be in common use for many reasons
critic659 2 years ago
actually they were, u'd be surprised how many childrens toys and items that are used daily are based on instruments of torture/death
critic659 2 years ago
he also mentions the dresden terror when allies-us, britain bombed dresden with fire bombs, that killed over 135 000 civilians!!! talk about a genocide..
Sarasu23 2 years ago 2
not genocide, WAR
when u declair war against a country, your gonna do what ever the fuck u want until the enemy gives up!
deadgameover 2 years ago
britain was BEING BOMBED not bombing, you god damn idoit
reven676 2 years ago
@reven676 U god damn idiot! Britain was bombing Dresden in 1945 and killed more than atomic bomb in Japan 1945. Watch this film!
Shaitantoo 1 year ago
0:34 just a tank doin donuts lmao
OrlandoPhotography 2 years ago
Flamethrower - the idea was born in Russia. Implemented in Germany during ww1
Maximuss87 2 years ago 2
this weapon just exists because someone thought he wants to light that thing over there, but hes to far away :S
lolipoppy135 2 years ago
flamethrowers are horrible
LIGHTRONIX 2 years ago
flamethrowers are awesome!
critic659 2 years ago 23
who need iron sights on a flamethrower?
dergin38467 2 years ago
it was a rocket launghing flamethrower because it was shot they put iron sights so it can shoot in the preferred direction.
DaTUkrAinIanKiD2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Workers-Farmers & progressive thinkers of the World Unite Against U.S imperialism-Terrorism & Fascisim.
ياعمال والفلاحين والتقدميين في العالم اتحدو ضد الامبرياليه الامريكيه الارهابيه والفاشيه.
bull9stud 2 years ago
yeah... shut up
dergin38467 2 years ago
hehehhe very good to cooking chicken or BBQ~
anakkambing 2 years ago 2
lol that would be so awesome.
could probably cook a whole chicken in seconds.
1cme1 2 years ago 3
nice, but subtitles would be appreciated...
korrighann 2 years ago
subtitles are: "BURN, HERETC!!!"
Freakazoit2 2 years ago 4
what is the name of the portable burstfiring rifle-like flamethrower they are using?
whatsmynameA4 2 years ago
LPO-50 (ЛПО-50)
Frontstaab 2 years ago
haha look at 3:22..
film made russian style.. :D
paXXniCht 2 years ago
ШАЙТАН-ТРУВА ВАХ ВАХ
RIO1987RUSgosu 2 years ago 5
Haha, good luck with that. Shooting flamethrower packs and an explosion following is highly unlikely. Most of the time, either the propellent or fuel would just spray out. Once again, thank you Hollywood!
1991BMWM5 3 years ago 3
i played the tank with flamethrower in Call of Duty 4 Wold at war... awesome...
lunaseapirate 3 years ago
CALL OF DUTY 5*
Brandon1267 2 years ago 5
Actually there is no call of duty 5 yet. WaW is a stand alone not a sequel.
Hakidia 2 years ago
but if u get killed by one, ouch... that won't be some thing u can walk off
jimnumberuno 3 years ago
*FACEPALM* No shit you can't walk it off, you're dead dumbass.
Hakidia 2 years ago
Comment removed
jazyn310 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
they fight for the right side, but i do think the russians are barbarian
BerendBroekhoff 3 years ago
we sure are
do not approach ^_^
ap0st1e 3 years ago
im not plannin on doing so, i like youre guys' style and i admire the spetnaz a lot, there amazing. i think they are the best special forces
BerendBroekhoff 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i think you're gay
Brianmuuh 2 years ago
think again
BerendBroekhoff 2 years ago 5
lol spetnaz
gsg9 all the way
profittlich 2 years ago
barbarian???? in war you do what ever the fuck you have to to win!!! do you know about the Massacre of Stalingrad?? until you know what the germans did, you are an idoit
reven676 2 years ago 35
How do you say Flamethrower in russian ?
Ryan432120 3 years ago 2
ognemёt =)
AsurSatan 3 years ago 3
не делайте Вас, только любят наш wepons они только трахающий скалу наши носки прочь
leavemealone300435 3 years ago
ты сам понял, что сказал???
vitaly1978 3 years ago
I saw and used that one .Shmel-good 4 close combat and 4 city. Really scary!
ratibor454 3 years ago
flame thover arenot used any mose gus theyr sice and highly dangerous when enemy fires behind
wardog044 3 years ago
actually its because its inhumane, its against the geneva convention, you should try not stateing facts that are false ;)
Catskills88 3 years ago
flame throwes don't seem to be used much on the battlefields anymore...I don't know why cuz they make great close support/bunker cleaning weapons. No matter what latest tech you have, nothing scares the shit out of anyone more than a big ball of fire.
BeigeFunk 3 years ago
this has to be the worse possible way to die in a combat situation. I mean if you think getting shot is bad, imagine slowlly burning to death. This and mustard gas are possiblly the most terrifying weapons of WW1 and WW2.
McMike321 3 years ago
Yes it would be very effective.
WarEffort 3 years ago
My great grandad was in the 2 world war. Flame throwers are the besr for close up combat.
rich187113 3 years ago
wtf is good in war?
Totyi008 3 years ago 2
burn the nazis
blackmesa10 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why? have they done anything to you?
BlikjeBier 3 years ago
He just said about his Grandfather in ww2 beinf a guy who used a flamethrower for the nazi's, so you tell me at the time that most soldiers in the german army didnt give a fuck about hitler, sure
wwwNooBcom 3 years ago
They don't need to give a fuck they fight for Nazis cuz there's nothing else to fight for
chineseguy15 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
haha your friends grandfather should have burned to a crisp for being a fucking nazi, evul bastard
wwwNooBcom 3 years ago
the hell are u talking about? ur just racist, the german army is made of mostly ppl who dont even care of hitler or nazis, they're just fighting for their country.
chineseguy15 3 years ago 4
both the flammenwerfer 35 & the red army issue flamethrower both had a tendancy to explode. my friends grandfather was flamethrower operator in ww2 for the nazi, his flamethrower backdrafted on him and left horrible burn scars on his face and body. he past away 3 years ago. my friend said he used to have horrible memories of burning people alive. i guess he could never forget their screams.
deadlyvibe999 3 years ago
My god... Talk about nightmares. Imagine being conscripted (or enlisting) in the army and they tell you that your job is going to be to burn people alive. Jesus f-ng christ, I didn't know that guy (the grandfather) but fuck him, he deserved the nightmares.
I mean, I'd rather go to jail than operate a fucking flamethrower - in fact, I'd rather be burned than operate a flamethrower.
Dmitriy27 3 years ago
fair enough comment, but soldiers had to kill or be killed no matter how u do it. i personally would find it more gruesome to be gutted by a bayonet.
deadlyvibe999 3 years ago