Added: 4 years ago
From: 01e9
Views: 239,473
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (362)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • По моему вторая часть полное гонево...

  • Close

    captions or anyone who can translate what he's saying @ 2:19-3:17 would be helpful! Thank you!

  • woo england tank video in ww1 rarelly no !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 7:30 Luxery rusian house

  • шайтан труба, шайтан орган )))))

  • Spetznaz take no prizoners comrades!

  • In Soviet Russia Fire Burns You

  • :-D Yaaaaay War. Cool Video.

  • nice hippie killer

  • 4:09, that's why you wear eye protection

  • In war there is no second place

  • I would love to be killed by a flamethrower

  • I'm laughing my ass off at Americans saying that flamethrowers are inhumane while their nation freely uses napalm cluster munitions in Afghanistan

    Grow the fuck up, war is where you kill the other guy before he kills you, mercy or fairness doesn't apply in any fashion

  • @adrastea99 I'm American and i think the same thing. I don't see how they are inhumane.

  • Really guys flamethrowers are not human nobody wants to burn better shoot him like a man

  • US airforce murderd 150,000 Tokyo residents in one night of fire bombing alone! 

  • @tropickman Well, how many civilians, captured soldiers and interned civilians were murdered by the Japanese, either by direct war moves or in camps?

  • In Soviet Russia, flame throws YOU!

  • @U2OS

    you killed me with this one....

  • Only in Russia do you show actual footage of guys on fire from flamethowers in WW2

  • ak is for pussies, g3 is for men

  • can i roast a chicken with that shit

  • @TELORINODELHOYO emm i think that yes why not :D

  • flame throwers are cool but as far as war goes, they are actually declared inhumane

  • I just nid a cheaper weapon? The pistol and shoot the soilder's back taht carries the tank for flamable liquid for flamethrower? guess what happens to him? LOL I win~

  • Everything i saw in TV about american weapons and military tech apears improved in these russians videos from 70ties and 80ties. Fuck! These russians rock! They keep it very hiidden and quiet, not like egocentric and exotic americans.

    Russia kills you, motherfucker.

    By the way, the only contry who face the real devil army in this world, the best of the best nazi troopers. Americans only fought with kids and old people, and have troubles in the west front.

  • @AlbatrossDude I agree 100% with you, the Soviets/Russia fucked the Nazis up the ass during WW2

  • @AlbatrossDude Thank you for your words.Russia never killed sons and daughters.Russia is most magnanimous country on our planet.We never attack other countries.Russia constantly provoke to bad affairs, but Russia will think before answering three times, because we not idiots

  • we dont need no water, let the mother f*ckers burn!!!

  • IM ON MOTHER F****** FIRE!!!!!!!!

  • i beriki ba destruksi di arschloski

  • Lol let's burn some fashists

  • Need a light? Let's burrrn.

  • youv got my attention

  • Полезное и нужное оружие для "убеждения" жидо-америкосов, которые иначе ничего не понимают.

  • HAHAHAHAHAHAHA nice hahahahahahaha

  • hay you know what your a bastard

  • =OOOOO why?

  • he is just a troll

  • why??because the communistic bitches killed my grandparents so i hate them?

  • that was years ago! get over it!

  • @vocko1

    shutUp asshole

  • No it aint, it's "When Trumpets Fade", bad ass old school movie of the battle of Hurtgen forest or something. It's got Timothy Oliphant in it, the guy in the newest die hard move

  • 1:02 it is from band of brothers heh

  • come again?

  • i don't speak or know whatever this language is but im pretty sure those tanks were british in the begining

  • It's Russian. I don't understand it, but I can hear the differences in the words.

  • Seriously this only irritating to listen to, just wants me to punch the guy talking in the face.

  • ага "труба".

  • sowieckie gawno

  • Thats why the world uses " Sowieckie" weapons, but you wouldn't know better cause your a dumb polack

  • stf

  • The world uses Soviet weapons because its the cheapest alternative on the market. You may have noticed how only poor third world countries use Soviet, while rich countries use Western

  • Chinese weapons anyone?

  • The reason some third world countries use Russian weapons was because of Politics. Just because the weapons are less expensive doesnt make them worse. AK-47 and other Russian weapons have proven to be some of the best weapons in the world

  • @rasko67 truth. it all comes down to preference in my opinion. what you train with, what your good with, and what you prefer. in some countries cases tho they have no choice of what weapon to use. everyone has it benefits and drawbacks no one is better. same with countries.. people need to get over this, i am better than your or this gun is better than that gun mentalities. these mentalities only lead to ethno and egocentrism and more wars. WHAT TRANCE SONG IS PLAYING IN THIS VIDEO ANYONE KNO!?

  • @rasko67 the ak 47 is the real WMD

  • @rasko67 I agree with you 100%. Russians have proven to have

    the best Anti-aircraft, Anti-tank, and Rocket Launchers in the world. Its just that the

    people who usually use Russians weapons are undertrained and poorly led.

  • @rasko67 Very tru the only thing about the ak is its accuracy other than that its a very good weapon bvut i like the m16 for personel reasons

  • @LastRealSamurai no accuracy is not a problem for ak, ak as perfectly accurate if used correctly and in the range they have to be used.

  • @PATRONSKiii: the ONLY situation in which accuracy isn't a problem for an AK is if you pile 500 people on top of eachother and spray wildly into the pile.

    dependable? sure. accurate? hardly...

  • @PooPoo2U Blabla, not interesting, AK in 7.62 are accurate up to 300m, AK in 5.45 and 5.56 are up to 500m, as all 5.56 rifles. But in reality, you will not be able to engage beyond 150m with any non scoped rifle

  • @PATRONSKiii: what's this? a frenchman talking guns?

    sorry, i don't accept gun-related opinions from people who never actually FIRE their guns. if you have any cheese-related opinions i'll be more than happy to entertain them though!

  • @PooPoo2U The frenchman fuck you morron, and I don't accept opinion of assholes as you. Come in my 93 dumbass, and we'll see if we don't have weapons, fucking morron. And yes we have best cheese your cheese is rubber plastic shit you are all obese, dying at 60 YO.

    And to finish, all your shit on AK is from your washed brain, AK are superior to US crap, and equal to europeans masterpieces.

  • @PATRONSKiii: lol, the ak is superior to US crap?

    i suppose that's why in the middle east AKs are so easy to find, yet some of them would still rather just throw rocks.

  • @PATRONSKiii: also, if you think AK is equal to "europeans masterpieces", you're a moron. it's a stamped metal piece of shit that's only real plus is its dependability.

    in other words, you can fill the barrel with water, slam some mud on the breech and it'll still shoot JUST AS INACCURATELY AS IT DID TO BEGIN WITH!

  • @PooPoo2U I'm not talking of Chinese type 56, or egypt made Maadi copy of AKM, i'm not talking of AK-47 and AKM which were good in their times. I'm talking about current manufature of AK : AK74M, AK100 series. their construction include all technics of high quality make in west, AK74M is a top rifle, and outperforms M16a4 in all aspects, exept the modularity (which is really not necessary). AK74M can be fitted with various sights, and the GP25/30 as well.

  • @PATRONSKiii: oh i love when people say "something completely outdoes something EXCEPT"

    if there's an "except" then it can't be "completely".

    the m16 is more accurate, is designed to be more ergonomic to the hand, fires a more controllable round, IS MORE MODULAR, and most important it's used by a better-trained military.

  • @PooPoo2U MAIS TU LE FAIS EXPRES BORDELLLLLLLLLLLL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­! T'es un casse couille de premiere toi !!!!! Alors selon toi le 5.45x39 est moins controlable que le 5.56x45 ??? MAIS JSUI BETE, je parle a un pauvre degénéré qui connait pas l'existance de l'AK74, qui a remplacer les AK en 7.62 dans toute l'europe de l'est et la russie depuis 30ans

    BREF, Tu me soules, t'as rien capté ??? Jm'en balance c'est plus kiffant d'etre grossier en français,

    SUR CE, ADIEU DUCON

  • @PATRONSKiii: yes, because obviously i would speak french. sorry, i speak 4 languages but french i'm afraid isn't one i ever wasted alot of time bothering with, as i feel you sound like you're trying to clear your throat the entire time you speak.

  • @PooPoo2U T STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOK MAOOOOON mais tu va pas me piqué, haha bolosse, au fait, j'ai dis adieu, ça veut dire adieu, pas aurevoir.

  • @PATRONSKiii: You can keep blathering on in french all you want and say whatever you like, but it doesn't change the fact that starting an argument in one language and finishing it in another makes YOU look like an idiot.

  • @PooPoo2U " it's used by a better-trained military." Colombians?

  • @PooPoo2U i like hove you tolk but i dont like what you tolk if you take a look of combat riful you must a system not just a an aspect and ak not a pice of shit

    + series like aek and so on but you right about acuracy of ak-47/74 m16a4 more acurate .... plz respect other people and ther opinions and some facts..

  • @Foenix47: I'll put this as simply as possible: yes, the AK is more reliable, but think how they're used: in squads.

    take 5 men with m16s and 5 with AK47s. now, imagine that 2 of the m16s don't work and all the AKs do. in that case you'd still have 3 guns that are more accurate versus 5 "reliable" AKs that couldn't hit the side of a barn from any type of range.

    these aren't person to person guns, they're assault rifles.

  • @PooPoo2U then read memoris of USA soldiers in vietnam about ak.....

    but you know a thing thet call a cover of a bulets (territory) 5 ak can make more supresive fire...

    but 3 m16 thet more acqarat but it dont gave a ultimate adventage to m16 ,new ak aqrat to ..

    sory for bed lang..

  • @Foenix47: I'll tell you one particular fact I remember about Vietnam:

    American casualties: 361.8K approximately.

    NVA casualties: 1.1 million.

    If you want a historical account of which gun is superior, Vietnam is hardly the benchmark I'd use.

  • @PooPoo2U ok in afganistan USSR lost near 10000-40000

    enemy losisys near 2milion

  • @Foenix47: again, horrible example. the mujahideen were equipped with old bolt action rifles and were fighting against russian spetsnaz equipped with AKs.

    Also, after America equipped them with Stinger missiles and RPGs and the Chinese sold them old Type 56 Rifles, the Mujahideen then ran the Soviets out with a copy of their own weapons.

  • @PooPoo2U who sey it shit to you ? USA gave them a lot of ther m16 but mostly they use ak47/74 USSR mostly made becouse of real big potential ,Chinese ak Polish and so on is crap of mettal !

    + you realy think thet USSR have just specnaz ther ? it is real few groope not an army

  • @Foenix47: Did I say there were only spetsnaz in Russia? No. Were the largest mass of the Russian forces who the mujihadeen fighting against Spetsnaz? Yes, because they were the best-trained to deal with paramilitary activities, which most regular armies aren't as well-trained or equipped to deal with.

  • @PooPoo2U sory for thet but you dont have information in Afganistan 90%+ of all units are just regular infantry.... but valantiars free will mans. spetcnaz = special forses = elite for special operations only... of in Vietnam Usa have only Delta ?

  • @PooPoo2U sory for thet but you dont have information in Afganistan 90%+ of all units are just regular infantry.... but valantiars free will mans. spetcnaz = special forses = elite for special operations only... of in Vietnam Usa have only Delta ? or seals

  • @Foenix47 We lost about 15.000 Soldiers there. But we managed to take a lot Mujahideen out.

  • @PATRONSKiii "But in reality, you will not be able to engage beyond 150m with any non scoped rifle" good point here,are you really from usa ?

  • What does that mean?

  • sure. but they win a war for us so it's ok for me.

  • Шайтан-труба - "S H M E L"

  • wtf are they saing

  • your an idiot

  • burning nazi's is fun

  • Шайтан-труба, нашальника :)

  • ajajajaj xD

  • Lol bbq krauts

  • range? 1000 meters? as if it could fire 1km

  • rpo "schmel" - only 600 m

    tos-1 " buratino" (russian pinokkio xD ) - about 10 km

  • the TOS-1, effective range is: 500 - 3500 m (5473828 yds)

  • nice! it comes with a bipod....

  • Why do russians think everying that explodes or catches fire is thermobaric? Argh. Shit's been going on since the MOAB childishness.

  • I blame it on translation

  • Comment removed

  • Таковы некоторые странные оружия. Страшно!

  • 1:05 is from a WWII movie.

  • Have you ever seen what a .50 or bomb can do to someone. War is hell. I wonder sometimes what is better, a quick, brutal war which solves the conflict, or a slow, "nice" one where people die decade after decade.

  • The falmethrower is a suprisingly effective weapon in urban environments. Yes, they are painful, and horrible. They can also take down tanks, just flame the thing and it will be a walk-in oven.

  • actually a flamethrower is a very efficeint weapon but unfortunately it is the design that is flawed. with a better design it would be in common use for many reasons

  • actually they were, u'd be surprised how many childrens toys and items that are used daily are based on instruments of torture/death

  • he also mentions the dresden terror when allies-us, britain bombed dresden with fire bombs, that killed over 135 000 civilians!!! talk about a genocide..

  • not genocide, WAR

    when u declair war against a country, your gonna do what ever the fuck u want until the enemy gives up!

  • britain was BEING BOMBED not bombing, you god damn idoit

  • @reven676 U god damn idiot! Britain was bombing Dresden in 1945 and killed more than atomic bomb in Japan 1945. Watch this film!

  • 0:34 just a tank doin donuts lmao

  • Flamethrower - the idea was born in Russia. Implemented in Germany during ww1

  • this weapon just exists because someone thought he wants to light that thing over there, but hes to far away :S

  • flamethrowers are horrible

  • flamethrowers are awesome!

  • who need iron sights on a flamethrower?

  • it was a rocket launghing flamethrower because it was shot they put iron sights so it can shoot in the preferred direction.

  • yeah... shut up

  • hehehhe very good to cooking chicken or BBQ~

  • lol that would be so awesome.

    could probably cook a whole chicken in seconds.

  • nice, but subtitles would be appreciated...

  • subtitles are: "BURN, HERETC!!!"

  • what is the name of the portable burstfiring rifle-like flamethrower they are using?

  • LPO-50 (ЛПО-50)

  • haha look at 3:22..

    film made russian style.. :D

  • ШАЙТАН-ТРУВА ВАХ ВАХ

  • Haha, good luck with that. Shooting flamethrower packs and an explosion following is highly unlikely. Most of the time, either the propellent or fuel would just spray out. Once again, thank you Hollywood!

  • i played the tank with flamethrower in Call of Duty 4 Wold at war... awesome...

  • CALL OF DUTY 5*

  • Actually there is no call of duty 5 yet. WaW is a stand alone not a sequel.

  • but if u get killed by one, ouch... that won't be some thing u can walk off

  • *FACEPALM* No shit you can't walk it off, you're dead dumbass.

  • Comment removed

  • we sure are

    do not approach ^_^

  • im not plannin on doing so, i like youre guys' style and i admire the spetnaz a lot, there amazing. i think they are the best special forces

  • think again

  • lol spetnaz

    gsg9 all the way

  • barbarian???? in war you do what ever the fuck you have to to win!!! do you know about the Massacre of Stalingrad?? until you know what the germans did, you are an idoit

  • How do you say Flamethrower in russian ?

  • ognemёt =)

  • не делайте Вас, только любят наш wepons они только трахающий скалу наши носки прочь

  • ты сам понял, что сказал???

  • I saw and used that one .Shmel-good 4 close combat and 4 city. Really scary!

  • flame thover arenot used any mose gus theyr sice and highly dangerous when enemy fires behind

  • actually its because its inhumane, its against the geneva convention, you should try not stateing facts that are false ;)

  • flame throwes don't seem to be used much on the battlefields anymore...I don't know why cuz they make great close support/bunker cleaning weapons. No matter what latest tech you have, nothing scares the shit out of anyone more than a big ball of fire.

  • this has to be the worse possible way to die in a combat situation. I mean if you think getting shot is bad, imagine slowlly burning to death. This and mustard gas are possiblly the most terrifying weapons of WW1 and WW2.

  • Yes it would be very effective.

  • My great grandad was in the 2 world war. Flame throwers are the besr for close up combat.

  • wtf is good in war?

  • burn the nazis

  • He just said about his Grandfather in ww2 beinf a guy who used a flamethrower for the nazi's, so you tell me at the time that most soldiers in the german army didnt give a fuck about hitler, sure

  • They don't need to give a fuck they fight for Nazis cuz there's nothing else to fight for

  • the hell are u talking about? ur just racist, the german army is made of mostly ppl who dont even care of hitler or nazis, they're just fighting for their country.

  • both the flammenwerfer 35 & the red army issue flamethrower both had a tendancy to explode. my friends grandfather was flamethrower operator in ww2 for the nazi, his flamethrower backdrafted on him and left horrible burn scars on his face and body. he past away 3 years ago. my friend said he used to have horrible memories of burning people alive. i guess he could never forget their screams.

  • My god... Talk about nightmares. Imagine being conscripted (or enlisting) in the army and they tell you that your job is going to be to burn people alive. Jesus f-ng christ, I didn't know that guy (the grandfather) but fuck him, he deserved the nightmares.

    I mean, I'd rather go to jail than operate a fucking flamethrower - in fact, I'd rather be burned than operate a flamethrower.

  • fair enough comment, but soldiers had to kill or be killed no matter how u do it. i personally would find it more gruesome to be gutted by a bayonet.