so what you are saying is that NASA was stupid enough to publish photos and videos of how they filmed the hoax? So why are there no harnesses or large wire cradles in the moon footage? How did they stop dust flying around? How did they shoot hours of video with no visible edits? How was the variable slow motion achieved without edits and with 60's video equipment?
@delahaye100 You obviously haven't been to NASA's archives and watched the videos yourself. They play out like Jesus's ventures through the bible. We see bits and bobs. NOT HOURS OF UNEDITED FOOTAGE. Don't try and bullshit me bub. I've spent ten years looking at this FRAUD. Does wet sand create dust that flies around? Does dry sand leave visible footprints? The problem with most Apollo worshippers, is they lack the same logic skills as the devoutly religious do! WIREMEN and SLOW MO MAGIC!
@un4g1v3n1 Does dry sand Does wet sand create dust .<<
Does over 40 years turn science and technology backward; or does science and technology forge ahead and make it far easier to achieve goals then in the past? EGMAG %^)
russia would have been aware of all this conspiracy theory for as long as its been going... and they bound to have looked into it in search for the smoking gun to prove beyond all doubt that US moon landing was fake, and thus give one big embarrassing fingers up at the US... would appear that they found no sufficiently smoking gun... unless some kind of exchange has been done
The space program in USSR was also created ,and to a great extend run ,by the same people as in USA.,German ex NAZI's,and it is obvious the information of the Apollo hoax would have reached some high Soviet ears.
They got payed simple.
Don't forget the billions tones of grain they received from USA.
Don't forget the USSR it's likely that was faking space missions as well.
Have you ever thought why these 2 countries never accused each other for doping in athletics for about 4 decades ?
The most disturbing thing is how close the the trainings photos look to the "real" moon photos look!
How could they guess the texture and average stone size of the moon's surface?? They never been there before!! The photos from earlier "unmanned" missions where not accurate enough to reveal this!
@un4g1v3n1 They mapped the Moon in great detail.Patric Moore the pompous English amateur astronomer who caused with his stupidity the stars visibility issue,back in the 60s was send by the BBC and took part in the Apollo preparations.I was watching a BBC comedy recently and somebody mention he was talking to Moore,and Moore was saying he was proud of helping to choose the landing sites..
That is to say they mapped the Moon in great detail so the JAXA card by the propagandists is no good.
Honestly.. the footage of us on the moon.. we look like fucking monkeys jumping up and down like idiots. Imagine a superior race looking down at us a facepalming, like Jean-Luc Picard. Fucking sigh..
Thanks for sending it. How bizarre!!!! You would think all photo evidence would have been destroyed right away.How does all this get out to the public?
Great job keep making them first time i see many of these pictures.....how it all works itself out in the end is beautiful.Honesty is(always)the best policy :) Right NASA...
Nice! Great video. NASA = pure fraud. I want my money back! :D
nameofthepen 1 week ago
so what you are saying is that NASA was stupid enough to publish photos and videos of how they filmed the hoax? So why are there no harnesses or large wire cradles in the moon footage? How did they stop dust flying around? How did they shoot hours of video with no visible edits? How was the variable slow motion achieved without edits and with 60's video equipment?
delahaye100 1 year ago
@delahaye100 You obviously haven't been to NASA's archives and watched the videos yourself. They play out like Jesus's ventures through the bible. We see bits and bobs. NOT HOURS OF UNEDITED FOOTAGE. Don't try and bullshit me bub. I've spent ten years looking at this FRAUD. Does wet sand create dust that flies around? Does dry sand leave visible footprints? The problem with most Apollo worshippers, is they lack the same logic skills as the devoutly religious do! WIREMEN and SLOW MO MAGIC!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 Does dry sand Does wet sand create dust .<<
Does over 40 years turn science and technology backward; or does science and technology forge ahead and make it far easier to achieve goals then in the past? EGMAG %^)
EGMAG 1 year ago
Here's Something That Also Doesn't Make Sense.... Who's The Camera Man Filming Them Fly Off The Moon?
It's Like Me Staying On The Moon To Sacrafice My Life Just For A Little Dildo Flies Off The Moon....
HarryIsntColourful 1 year ago
@HarryIsntColourful It was a remote controlled camera..
delahaye100 1 year ago
russia would have been aware of all this conspiracy theory for as long as its been going... and they bound to have looked into it in search for the smoking gun to prove beyond all doubt that US moon landing was fake, and thus give one big embarrassing fingers up at the US... would appear that they found no sufficiently smoking gun... unless some kind of exchange has been done
ghodium 1 year ago
@ghodium
The space program in USSR was also created ,and to a great extend run ,by the same people as in USA.,German ex NAZI's,and it is obvious the information of the Apollo hoax would have reached some high Soviet ears.
They got payed simple.
Don't forget the billions tones of grain they received from USA.
Don't forget the USSR it's likely that was faking space missions as well.
Have you ever thought why these 2 countries never accused each other for doping in athletics for about 4 decades ?
potrodsas 1 year ago
The most disturbing thing is how close the the trainings photos look to the "real" moon photos look!
How could they guess the texture and average stone size of the moon's surface?? They never been there before!! The photos from earlier "unmanned" missions where not accurate enough to reveal this!
The Apollo Missions are as real as Santa Claus.
Gigaloader 1 year ago
What are you "trying" to prove? The footage you provide is for training not faking the moon landings.
You probably believe that 911 was a conspiracy too.
spoonman01 1 year ago 2
@spoonman01 Why need fake moonscapes for training? 911 was coverup.
LLnuLLy 1 year ago
@spoonman01
Exactly what training is going on @0:54?
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas With a budget like NASA had back then, you can create some very realistic looking moon models eh?
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 They mapped the Moon in great detail.Patric Moore the pompous English amateur astronomer who caused with his stupidity the stars visibility issue,back in the 60s was send by the BBC and took part in the Apollo preparations.I was watching a BBC comedy recently and somebody mention he was talking to Moore,and Moore was saying he was proud of helping to choose the landing sites..
That is to say they mapped the Moon in great detail so the JAXA card by the propagandists is no good.
potrodsas 1 year ago
Honestly.. the footage of us on the moon.. we look like fucking monkeys jumping up and down like idiots. Imagine a superior race looking down at us a facepalming, like Jean-Luc Picard. Fucking sigh..
LOLDISNEYLAND 1 year ago
Another great video! .. You have done the CT's on YouTube proud once again!
Keep em coming buddy!!
straydog02 3 years ago
Another hit,:)
Artifalia 3 years ago
Thanks for sending it. How bizarre!!!! You would think all photo evidence would have been destroyed right away.How does all this get out to the public?
janetd58 3 years ago
These pictures are from what they touted as simulations. Or should we call them rehearsals? LOL
un4g1v3n1 3 years ago
Oh!!!! I get it, some days I am slower than others!!
janetd58 3 years ago
Faved and 5***** great stuff!!
Is this from a DVD ?
krokus69 3 years ago
Thanks krokus69! Nope, just made it today! NASA footage and NASA photos.
un4g1v3n1 3 years ago
Great job keep making them first time i see many of these pictures.....how it all works itself out in the end is beautiful.Honesty is(always)the best policy :) Right NASA...
krokus69 3 years ago
I'm finding more 'simulation' pics. I may have to make an Apollo BTS 2. It's incredible!
un4g1v3n1 3 years ago