Added: 2 years ago
From: MegaSvensk86
Views: 25,637
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • he mad

  • I don't blame Tukka. I would flip a tit too if I lost.

  • The second shot doesn't even hit the NET. It isn't even a post. it hit the fucking boards. So pathetic. I'd loose it.

  • reffs prob a hab fan

  • the espn hadnt a clue of the rules...seing as it IS no goal when the guy stopped oing forward

  • Tukka: wtf that was a miss cant u fkin see hit hit the cross bar ,ref:no *rask freaks*

  • too bad tuukka is going to be the best goalie in the league soon if not best top 3 along with price and markstrom

  • The bad thing is it really never went in, watch it with vlc player in slow motion. That's not even being lousy. That ref is a low life.

  • "HE LOST HIS MIIIND" haha :D

  • 1st "goal" does not count, second "goal" idkk

  • wouldn't it be fun though to do something like that just go crazy just for the fun of it lol

  • Tuukka rules!

  • Comment removed

  • looks like good editing. some important move have been cut out at beginning of the vid.

  • @kella91 well the first move the player lost the puck, and when in slid to the side of the net he spun and shot it while Tukka was barely paying attention. This should be no goal as you arent supposed to be able to stop the forward motion of the puck. However a spinning shot would involve the puck going backwards. This frustrated Tukka because it was called a goal

  • reason 34 why goalies are awesome

  • HE TAKES AFTER TIMMAH

  • Lost his shit completely.

  • He plays for the Bruins now, had the lowest goals against average for the 2010 reg season.

  • well done tuukka, well done!!

  • he so saved that

  • Hilarious!!

  • Rask is awesome!

  • tuuka is ma hero

  • That was not goal That 2 one

  • even the first one wasn't a goal he went missed the shot, so the rule says once he attempts the shot and it was pokechecked the forward process is finish meaning that should of not been a goal

  • Rask has a good arguement. the rule is there must be forward progress and the pokecheck ruined that

  • i was at that game...and it was complete bullshit...rask went to poke check and the guy lost the puck and it went backwards...the forward knew he blew the play, but just sort of playfully shot the puck in when he went back to get it...and they called it a goal...it was bs b/c if he hadn't scored the 1st one, the game was over.

  • I knew NHL refs were bad, but AHL refs apparently are total bullshit.

  • @Superpizzabros all refs are

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more