As I read in Bruce Catton's 'Glory Road' to quote indirectly; 'Pickett's Charge was perhpas the last time in American History, and perhaps history itself, men lined up in perfect rows on an open field for an attack.'
Field musicians and bands, were the last vestiges of Napoleonic warfare vs. mass produced rifled infantry muskets.
@OldVoice maybe you missed Cold Harbor, Selma, Lee's last counter attack at Petersburg to name but a few major such attacks... aspects of Napoleonic warfare continued long after our Civil War and even during that period, French style heavy infantry tactics were used at several battles by Federals with varying degrees of success
dude ok first of all i wasnt saying the southern people were wimps i wuz just saying that the union soldiers got thrown into a lot of stupid shit and lost 5 times more men than the rebs. look at FT. WAGNER, AND FREDRICKSBURG. the union's commanders like always throw their troops into certain death. hell atleast the confederate generals fought a defensive campaign almost every time
Bigmoon, I don't think you deserve these negitive reations but at the same time, I must disagree with you. Both sides were right and oth sides were wrong. The north was wrong in removing states rights but I don't think that that's enough to call them "Pure evil".
Entertaining as a side performance maybe. Too many people are turning to style over sustance with the emergence of groups like "Top Secret." It just isn't traditional or "Ancient" if you will. Not bad just that in Civil War garb the performance doesn't fit IMHO.
They didnt run like cowards, it was simply two different life styles clashed, where southerners grew up on hunting and the land northerners thrived in the cities and factories. The thing that really did the south in wasnt the fact that they were cowards but that the North had more soldiers, and Grant used that to his advantage, he was able to throw 80,000 troops at a time at the southern lines take 20,000 casualties in the first 30 minutes and keep going, in the end it was a war of numbers.
No the South lost because they were on the wrong side of historic truth. In the end, if the truth prevails - and their ideas were wrong - slavery (working for no wages or pathetic wages while the few benefit at the expense of the many), feudalism (treating southern poor whites as second class trash serfs), free trade (opening up your market to everything, never developing the factories necc. for winning wars etc. being dom. by Britain)..kinda the ideas we've lived with since 1971 minus slavery.
My great great great grandfather died with the Irish Brigade at Marye's Heights, Fredericksburg. Too bad he didn't live to see the Rebs turn tail and run like jackrabbits at Gettysburg. You list, live with it like man rather than disparaging those who served and died to preserve their country.
you kidding me??? who charged up st.marys heights at fredricksburg??? what regiment lost half its men at ft. wagner??? yea the south wuz really tougher than the union.
retarded much? Southern People are no Different than Northern People. But if we're counting, the union army had the northern drummer to keep them moving, thus winning the war. So I'd say the Northern Drummer is better.. lol But who cares, there is really no difference.
Seen them at many events...when its cold or you are tired from guard/the previous "battle" or what have you, they can fire you up for a new day!
6134chuck 2 months ago
The guys are HOT!
MrKe4bss 4 months ago
Great video, high school drum lines can learn a lot from this. You don't need lots of movement or props to be awesome.
severedarterie 7 months ago
Comment removed
civilwarcorporal 1 year ago
As I read in Bruce Catton's 'Glory Road' to quote indirectly; 'Pickett's Charge was perhpas the last time in American History, and perhaps history itself, men lined up in perfect rows on an open field for an attack.'
Field musicians and bands, were the last vestiges of Napoleonic warfare vs. mass produced rifled infantry muskets.
OldVoice 1 year ago
@OldVoice maybe you missed Cold Harbor, Selma, Lee's last counter attack at Petersburg to name but a few major such attacks... aspects of Napoleonic warfare continued long after our Civil War and even during that period, French style heavy infantry tactics were used at several battles by Federals with varying degrees of success
6134chuck 2 months ago
that was bad ass!
whoatommy 1 year ago
More drums less guns, I say!
luvz2drum99 1 year ago 2
@luvz2drum99, I agree!
LeotheUSALion 1 year ago
Great job! Thanks!
Fritztoons 1 year ago
Not bad for a bunch of yanks!!!!
stevensneedjr 2 years ago
SWEET!
OldVoice 2 years ago
all i gotta say is that these old dudes can ram some notes.
kixsian 2 years ago
I had 109 family members on the confederate side and 69 on the union so in that chase, really was a family against each other situation.
Tisu224 2 years ago 7
@Tisu224 wow, ur family is massive
Wackylackay 11 months ago
@Tisu224 wow, ur family is massive, i guess ur southern side had alot of cousins :D
Wackylackay 11 months ago
@Tisu224 really wow
1709243 5 months ago
wow people, just enjoy the vid lol
john3047X 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The union was pure evil
Bigmoonproductions 2 years ago
dude ok first of all i wasnt saying the southern people were wimps i wuz just saying that the union soldiers got thrown into a lot of stupid shit and lost 5 times more men than the rebs. look at FT. WAGNER, AND FREDRICKSBURG. the union's commanders like always throw their troops into certain death. hell atleast the confederate generals fought a defensive campaign almost every time
2ndpadrummer 2 years ago
@2ndpadrummer actual battle losses were less than 1.2 to 1 for Feds versus Confeds. Most men on both sides died by disease.
Though there were some lop sided kill ratios at times, overall the losses were almost a statistical tie.
6134chuck 2 months ago
Bigmoon, I don't think you deserve these negitive reations but at the same time, I must disagree with you. Both sides were right and oth sides were wrong. The north was wrong in removing states rights but I don't think that that's enough to call them "Pure evil".
filmmakermennona 2 years ago
Now that's talent.
Chicken10843 2 years ago
damn!!!!! nice stick clicks at 1:52, you guys kicked the old guards ass!!! keep playing!!
2ndpadrummer 2 years ago
Preserve the Union!!!!!
ShawnC15 2 years ago
Entertaining as a side performance maybe. Too many people are turning to style over sustance with the emergence of groups like "Top Secret." It just isn't traditional or "Ancient" if you will. Not bad just that in Civil War garb the performance doesn't fit IMHO.
SECT404 3 years ago
Oh , and waht happened when the war turned against the south? Yep, the RAN like the COWARDS they were
frothslosh 3 years ago
not exactly, but you think what you want if it makes you feel better. If you wanna learn something go research it.
sa1911a1 3 years ago
They didnt run like cowards, it was simply two different life styles clashed, where southerners grew up on hunting and the land northerners thrived in the cities and factories. The thing that really did the south in wasnt the fact that they were cowards but that the North had more soldiers, and Grant used that to his advantage, he was able to throw 80,000 troops at a time at the southern lines take 20,000 casualties in the first 30 minutes and keep going, in the end it was a war of numbers.
mgkusmc 3 years ago
No the South lost because they were on the wrong side of historic truth. In the end, if the truth prevails - and their ideas were wrong - slavery (working for no wages or pathetic wages while the few benefit at the expense of the many), feudalism (treating southern poor whites as second class trash serfs), free trade (opening up your market to everything, never developing the factories necc. for winning wars etc. being dom. by Britain)..kinda the ideas we've lived with since 1971 minus slavery.
northmeister 2 years ago
If you mean they inflicted twice as many casualties on the Union forces as were inflicted on them, then yeah, they ran like cowards.
therealalabamian 2 years ago
My great great great grandfather died with the Irish Brigade at Marye's Heights, Fredericksburg. Too bad he didn't live to see the Rebs turn tail and run like jackrabbits at Gettysburg. You list, live with it like man rather than disparaging those who served and died to preserve their country.
mdwhite64 2 years ago
southern people are tougher than northeners, i dont know about now but in the 1800s they were.
DurhamRebel 3 years ago
They still are, don't worry.
sa1911a1 3 years ago
you kidding me??? who charged up st.marys heights at fredricksburg??? what regiment lost half its men at ft. wagner??? yea the south wuz really tougher than the union.
2ndpadrummer 2 years ago
The south was dumbas! Every battle they were outnumberd! So dont say wre not tougher. Talk about ignorance.
Bigmoonproductions 2 years ago
Yeah, too bad they lost...
CaptainAmerica322 2 years ago
A southern drummer could beat a northerner any day.
DurhamRebel 3 years ago 2
retarded much? Southern People are no Different than Northern People. But if we're counting, the union army had the northern drummer to keep them moving, thus winning the war. So I'd say the Northern Drummer is better.. lol But who cares, there is really no difference.
kbuddha420 3 years ago
im a southern drummer boy i could beat those yanks any day
johnyreb13 3 years ago
No, no you couldn't.
benpg 3 years ago 9
got a tape of them years ago good shit
88M325TC 4 years ago
My private lesson teacher is in this, and im working on the drummers chase
princeali69 4 years ago