Had the first re-entry failed the issue becomes one of how long the crews' air and water would have lasted - probably not long enough, particulary as the richochet courses are conjectural.
I've read that the primary issue concerning the engineers( prior to the tank explosion) was the center engine cut-off due to pogo oscillation (which was countered safely before catastrophic failure). That event forced a longer burn on the remaining engines....
Interesting. It brings up another question - what were the trajectories of the service module and lunar module after the Astronauts left them in the return capsule? Could they still be orbiting the earth or floating in space, or did then re-enter the Earth's atmosphere? If so, when? That would also be interesting to know.
In this case, wikipedia *is* correct. The LM and SM were pretty much on identical trajectories to the CM and they all plunged into the Earth's atmosphere at about the same time the astronauts themselves reentered.
@SZSearcher I've found Wikipedia to be remarkably reliable, but more importantly I can follow the citations to the original sources.
There's an amazing amount of Apollo-era technical documentation online at the NASA Technical Reports Server, ntrs nasa gov. There's a detailed report for each Apollo mission, plus a separate report on the performance of its launch vehicle.
@ldsgems The LM burnt-up over Fiji, and the remains went to the bottom of the Tongan Trench. The reason for this particular placement was the high re-entry velocity,and the need to dispose of the SNAP-27 RTG as safely as possible. U.S. DOE continues to monitor the area around the RTG. My source: Wiki (Apollo 13 RTG)
@ldsgems NASA has confirmed that the SM and the LM reentered the Earths atmosphere about a few days after the mission was over. The LM reentered around Japan and the SM reentered somewhere in the Pacific.
@ldsgems they would have both re-entered because they would have been blown off on a differend course in relation to the CM, but only by a few small miles or so. My point is those pieces would have still been on the free return trajerctory and therefore would have re-entered.
Wow that software is OUT OF THIS WORLD
Larrythebassman 1 month ago
Very interesting, and the comprehensive power of the diagrams are perfect.
TheJediCharles 5 months ago
A nice footnote to the Apollo 13 mission.
oomblikkies 6 months ago
But what about the Sun gravity?
tomczas7521 1 year ago
@tomczas7521 the earth the moon and everything that has ever gone into orbit has been under the influence of the sun's gravity
SuperTennis3 10 months ago
many many thanks.
xxxrayxxx1 1 year ago
that is cool thanks for posting
cyberlight22 1 year ago
GOOD
tankai2008gmail 1 year ago
Cool...l learned something new today...thanks!
sritger 1 year ago
good
ytwatchpagetester 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
good
ytwatchpagetester 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
good
ytwatchpagetester 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
good
ytwatchpagetester 1 year ago
good
ytwatchpagetester 1 year ago
good
ytwatchpagetester 1 year ago
Had the first re-entry failed the issue becomes one of how long the crews' air and water would have lasted - probably not long enough, particulary as the richochet courses are conjectural.
Widder23D 1 year ago
who read this on universetoday ?
mostwanted115 1 year ago
I've read that the primary issue concerning the engineers( prior to the tank explosion) was the center engine cut-off due to pogo oscillation (which was countered safely before catastrophic failure). That event forced a longer burn on the remaining engines....
sneakerset 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As least this one time NASA admits that Apollo astronauts didn't go to the Moon.
sonofhermes5 1 year ago
@sonofhermes5
You are a moron.
Skobbles 1 year ago 10
@Skobbles
What did NASA do with the videotape on the Apollo 11 moonwalk?
Oh, they erased it?
It doesn't take a genius to know that was the most historically important video tape in the history of NASA.
Well, how about the video of the Apollo 12 moonwalk?
Oh, the camera was aimed toward the sun and burned out?
It doesn't take a genius to know not to aim a TV camera at the sun.
You can call me a moron. Just don't call me a 'NASA Genius.'
sonofhermes5 1 year ago
Interesting. It brings up another question - what were the trajectories of the service module and lunar module after the Astronauts left them in the return capsule? Could they still be orbiting the earth or floating in space, or did then re-enter the Earth's atmosphere? If so, when? That would also be interesting to know.
ldsgems 1 year ago 8
They reentered Earth's atmosphere and burned up. Check Wikipedia for Apollo 13, there's even a picture of said event.
blackmh 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wikipedia . . . now there's a reliable source of information.
SZSearcher 1 year ago
In this case, wikipedia *is* correct. The LM and SM were pretty much on identical trajectories to the CM and they all plunged into the Earth's atmosphere at about the same time the astronauts themselves reentered.
ugowar 1 year ago
@SZSearcher I've found Wikipedia to be remarkably reliable, but more importantly I can follow the citations to the original sources.
There's an amazing amount of Apollo-era technical documentation online at the NASA Technical Reports Server, ntrs nasa gov. There's a detailed report for each Apollo mission, plus a separate report on the performance of its launch vehicle.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
@ldsgems The LM burnt-up over Fiji, and the remains went to the bottom of the Tongan Trench. The reason for this particular placement was the high re-entry velocity,and the need to dispose of the SNAP-27 RTG as safely as possible. U.S. DOE continues to monitor the area around the RTG. My source: Wiki (Apollo 13 RTG)
sneakerset 1 year ago
@ldsgems NASA has confirmed that the SM and the LM reentered the Earths atmosphere about a few days after the mission was over. The LM reentered around Japan and the SM reentered somewhere in the Pacific.
godistheway123 1 year ago
@ldsgems they would have both re-entered because they would have been blown off on a differend course in relation to the CM, but only by a few small miles or so. My point is those pieces would have still been on the free return trajerctory and therefore would have re-entered.
SuperTennis3 10 months ago