go look at the physics forum on why wider tyres is better for grip, and you'll be amazed at the array of factors which come into play; the general consensus there and according to "physics of racing" handbook, larger tyres are more grippy.
Other factors come into play as well. If you look up tyre sensitivites, because of deformation compression the friction is not exactly proportional to the weight. The higher the weight, the less the coefficient becomes. On a infinitessmal basis, per unit area of tyre, the higher the normal force, (which equals pressure , P = F/A), the less the friction coefficient. So if you increase the size of the contact patch, the pressure is lower and the cf is higher.
@ASSHOLELA Their physical size has nothing to do with their coefficient of friction. That same compound built into a smaller tire would hook just as well. It would probably start coming apart after 15-20 passes at that speed, but whatever, nobody gets into racing thinking it'll be cheap.
the coefficient of friction is not directly related to tyre grip. The coefficient of traction which sums up the pneumatic properties of the tyre does. larger tyres can mold around the surface of the road better, can work with lower pressure, and have lower tyre load sensitivities than smaller ones, amongst other things.
@ASSHOLELA That may be true(I'm CERTAINLY not a physics student), but in this case I don't think it makes any difference because drag strips are as smooth as glass at the start line. They don't have much as far as surface features until 1/2 way down the track. In that case wouldn't cf be the only thing you can use for traction calculations?
if you prefer that way yes. But on the molecular level, you;ll find that rubber at drag temperatures doesnt just come into contact with the road surface. It tries to fill up every nook and cranny like a very viscous goo.
@ASSHOLELA with that kind of acceleration and power, the down force on the rear tires is enough to hold SOME traction, and then they heat up, and grip better. and with how wide those tires are, there would be no problem with contact. plus, michilin has a tire that grip latterally up to 1g, so this is not that unlikely, i like the science behind your answer, but you did not apply all of the factors that are in play.
@ASSHOLELA "there is no downforce when torque is applied at the wheel..."
I'm not saying you're necessarily right or wrong, but consider this: have you ever seen a set of traction bars? The way they work does generate downforce against the tires (through the axial housing) when torque is applied to the tires.
Also weight transfer during a hard launch can effectively generate a downforce against the tires on a rwd car. Picture a wheel stand on a drag car.
that is not downforce per se. downforce is defined as an external force on the car which presses the car onto the ground, like aerodynamic. This result is internal, merely traction.
the traction bars help reduce wheelhop which turns traction intermittent. the net increase in traction is only modest.
@ASSHOLELA When the axial whines up the leaf springs the snuber on the traction bar hit the frame of the car thus forcing the the axial, and thus the wheels, in a downward motion.
Force + downward motion = downforce. So if a car is properly equipped (not just traction bars do this) there IS downforce applied to the wheels when torque is applied. It still meets the basic definition of "downforce." Downforce isn't ONLY generated aerodynamically.
that is not downforce. Downforce is defined as EXTERNAL FORCE, something not generated by the car. Something generated by the car itself, for example, the suspension against the ground, is a contributor towards basic traction.
@ASSHOLELA So a force generated in a downward motion is not downforce? Were is it written that downforce must be and can only be generated aerodynamically for it to be downforce?
When we talk about cars and we say "downforce", we do generally mean downward force generated aerodynamically against the body of the car, and thus ultimately the wheels of the car at speed. But that's not the only kind of downforce a car can generate. It can also generate it mechanically with torque.
@ASSHOLELA "Downforce is defined as EXTERNAL FORCE, something not generated by the car."
Okay, but even aerodynamic downforce IS generated by the car!! You don't have downforce until the car's engine generates power to propel the car forward! THEN the interaction of the car's body crashing against (relatively) stationary air creates aerodynamic downforce. Generating downforce against the wheels, both aerodynamically and mechanically, is ultimately generated by the engine.
@ASSHOLELA "there is no downforce when torque is applied at the wheel..."
I'm not saying you're necessarily right or wrong, but consider this: have you ever seen a set of traction bars? The way they work does generate downforce against the tires (through the axial housing) when torque is applied to the tires.
Also weight transfer during a hard launch can effectively generate a downforce against the tires. Picture a wheel stand on a drag car.
Well, it's not a production car after what he's done to it, so it's not eligible for the "world's fastest car" title. Also, he's fitted nitrous, which is as good as cheating.
Sadly this is not the world's fastest car. I lived overseas with filthy rich Arabs my entire life. 2k hp is unbelievable, but, my buddies who are Arabs pimed a BMW to max 2.5k horses. 80$ car + 'X' amount of money is > this guy. Don't question Dubai's royal family's cash
Thats English engineering for you, the best, Caterham does 0-60 in fewer than 3 secs, and any super car would struggle to do that. We also make Westfield, Rolls Royce, Bentley, Morgan, AC and MG!
No shit thats why I said apples and oranges, these guys constantly say ITS FASTER. and its the FASTEST street legal car, when the Bugatti veyron was only supposed to be the fastest top speed.
Ok thats nice. But buggatti would rape this in top speed and around a track. And I would rather drive in a nice smooth, comfortable, slick ride then a smoking, loud, piece of metal, which looks like its about to breakdown any second. Speaking of breaking down. It's an American muscle car with 2,200 horsepower built by an ordinary auto tech. Sounds really reliable. 9.3L V8. Boy when will they ever learn? Gas mileage shot to hell. Anybody who would buy this for 100,000 get what they deserved.
And Im saying the bugatti would rape it at high speeds, I can still be comfortable and take corners, and it will still work at the end of the day. Wow +1 for the gaz guzzling piece of metal. +6 for the Veyron.
bugatti is shit looks like a VW bug its probably modeled after it aswell id rather have a ccx..sure it would rape it t high speeds but please tell me where you can go 407 km/h?
eurosnobs like yourself do not understand the attraction these cars have to people that enjoy these cars. It does not get driven daily, its a 7 second car! comparing it to the Bugatti is a retarded idea. they are impossible to see them in the same light. Think about it. Bugattis' car is 800 grand worth of car, yet if you put 800 thousand DOLLARS to a car, you would probably have 500 thousand left over because you would have bought everything imagineable. I would rather build my own car, really
yeah buddy, got no more facts to say so you resort to a comment like that. In all reality, your spending 500,000 on the car, and another 500,000 for the name. sure a bugattis nice, I like em. but I dont like trolls like you talking shit about stuff you dont understand.
You don't understand. It takes more then just increasing the bore of the engine to create a car like a bugatti. If you actually did research the W16 in Bugatti actually makes 3,000 hp. Only 1000 is transferred to the wheels. 1000 to the cooling system. 1000 to w/e. There's a reason why they did that. So the car would run smoothly. I would like to have my nice interior, and not smell my exhaust. You pay for speed, luxury, reliability, technology, sophistication, style, and quality.
@reign1222 Don't feel too bad. Even though this is the dumbest comment here, it's certainly not the only dumb thing said. Seriously, 1000 HP directed to the cooling system? I needed a good laugh, and that was it.
@Target262 the veryon is sold at a loss to the company, its done as a PROJECT. Name? My arse man, you're paying the engineers for the solutions, the parts, and they're still giving bits of it away after that.
Yes, but other drag cars aren't street legal - the point here is that this thing kicked asses of every single hypercar in the world - bugatti, SSc ultimate Aero and so on... respect, even though we're only talking about plain axeleration from a standstill...
The ultimate aero is not american muscle. Sure, it's made by an american producer and with an american engine, but other than that, it is a road going super car.
Who cares if a veyron could kick his ass in the long run. He built it for the quarter mile its all about low end speed. It should just be apprieated for what he has built and not complaining and comparing.....
true, but on a drag strip, i would laugh at the damn thing, who waists half their life working on a car that used to do 0-60 in 9.3 and make it like 2.0? buy a damn zo6 or zr1 and spend a good 10 grand and tune it properly and there you go. instead of waisting tens of thousands of dollars...
There is no fun in just throwing money out and getting w/e you want, You can have Pride you built something and you have done something great and different. Just saying :)
veyron is pretty shitty on the track as well, i mean compared for money... get a gt-r hahaha or i dunno if u seem to be so rich.. ferrari fxx with slicks
i know it's SSR. i typed it wrong. and you might be right on the accelerating and decelerating but that is not how the fastest is determined. they take a PRODUCTION car and run it on a dyno then run it on a set strip one way then back to cancel out wind resistance. the SSR is the fastest production car b =y top speed.
The Veyron isn't even the fastest production car anymore. It's just expensive as all get out. CCR Ultimate Aero is the fastest production car in the world.
Yeah, the Veyron has something emotional about it going and while it may not be as quick as that, I'd walk right past that car any day to hop into the Veyron.
if you're a mechanic like this guy, there's no reason why not to have one. Any reliability issues he could fix himself, considering he pretty much built the monster
they veyron would not just kick his ass, it would rip him a neww asshole, fuck this things garbage why would u spend so much on something that cant e
ven do the fuji speedway or the suzuka? drag racing? lol its shit, dont understand the point, so what, u got a fast car, (straight line) but u turn and u lose all fucking control and go slipping all the way to fucking china before stopping.
This is bullshit my daddies space shuttle can go faster than this, all i have to do is lap dance in front of daddy and bam, i gotz the keys to the space shuttle!!
Not a fucking record!!!!!! The fastest quarter mile is 6.144
JoshDambuleff 1 day ago
go look at the physics forum on why wider tyres is better for grip, and you'll be amazed at the array of factors which come into play; the general consensus there and according to "physics of racing" handbook, larger tyres are more grippy.
ASSHOLELA 2 months ago
Other factors come into play as well. If you look up tyre sensitivites, because of deformation compression the friction is not exactly proportional to the weight. The higher the weight, the less the coefficient becomes. On a infinitessmal basis, per unit area of tyre, the higher the normal force, (which equals pressure , P = F/A), the less the friction coefficient. So if you increase the size of the contact patch, the pressure is lower and the cf is higher.
ASSHOLELA 2 months ago
f1 tyres are wider and bigger than red victors, yet they can pull at most 2.0gs.
ASSHOLELA 2 months ago
lmao.. lmfao, the fastest car from 0-60 that is street legal is the cobra, get over it people, shelby cobras will allways own
steveomlb13 7 months ago
@steveomlb13 haha your funny
TissueBoxGaming 6 months ago
@steveomlb13 cobra fastest car in the world, i cant stop laughing
TissueBoxGaming 6 months ago
@steveomlb13 i think is the veyron
Illkiron 6 months ago
i want that car!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D
gregoriousmax 9 months ago
85p for a litre of petrol. god i miss those days...
ChingMan09 10 months ago
see see stickers make it go fast, its proven =D
svt2002lalo 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pointless...dragging doesn't prove much anyways...
DrGamble28 1 year ago
Hey its borat
actingbearfreak 1 year ago
1.. 2.. 3.. took a lil longer than 1 second...
JackMcCracken15 1 year ago
why try and argue with what been proven?? i hate this site sometimes because people write some dick head comments!!! i.e some of the below
08bignev 1 year ago
haha...its 1/4 mile is slower then a 1.8l toyota starlet....
drummaniac2030 1 year ago
go watch dc shoes gymkhana or whatever. their car does it in 1.9
RAPMASHUPSCANADA 1 year ago
He looks stupid with his hair
400exstunter 1 year ago
uh don't you have to be going zero to do 0-60? this is stupid.
countyingula 1 year ago
1970 what? i cant understand crap.
Scmshacks 1 year ago
i wonder how this asshole gest 0-60mph in 1s.
There'll be so much wheelspin because there is no downforce at all.
the tyres are narrow and they arent slicks.
more like 0-60kmh in 1s.
even f1 cars with properly warmed slick tyres go 0-60 in 2s.
ASSHOLELA 1 year ago
0-60mph in 1 second the car is pulling a damn fricking 2.7gs.
Tell me, which tyres in the world can stay in contact with the road when the force acting on it is 2.7g?
Even the best supercar tyres pull at most 1.4gs. and these are ordinary street tyres.
any RWD car under that kind of horizontal g forces will simply spin out.
ASSHOLELA 1 year ago 6
@ASSHOLELA Top fuel dragsters pull what, like 6 g's? There ARE tires out there that can do it.
meandmyevo 2 months ago
@meandmyevo
you're right. but look at the size of those dragster tyres. how wide and tall are they? would they even fit bene ath red victor?
ASSHOLELA 2 months ago
@ASSHOLELA Their physical size has nothing to do with their coefficient of friction. That same compound built into a smaller tire would hook just as well. It would probably start coming apart after 15-20 passes at that speed, but whatever, nobody gets into racing thinking it'll be cheap.
meandmyevo 2 months ago
Comment removed
ASSHOLELA 2 months ago
@meandmyevo
the coefficient of friction is not directly related to tyre grip. The coefficient of traction which sums up the pneumatic properties of the tyre does. larger tyres can mold around the surface of the road better, can work with lower pressure, and have lower tyre load sensitivities than smaller ones, amongst other things.
ASSHOLELA 2 months ago
@ASSHOLELA That may be true(I'm CERTAINLY not a physics student), but in this case I don't think it makes any difference because drag strips are as smooth as glass at the start line. They don't have much as far as surface features until 1/2 way down the track. In that case wouldn't cf be the only thing you can use for traction calculations?
meandmyevo 2 months ago
@meandmyevo
if you prefer that way yes. But on the molecular level, you;ll find that rubber at drag temperatures doesnt just come into contact with the road surface. It tries to fill up every nook and cranny like a very viscous goo.
ASSHOLELA 2 months ago
@ASSHOLELA with that kind of acceleration and power, the down force on the rear tires is enough to hold SOME traction, and then they heat up, and grip better. and with how wide those tires are, there would be no problem with contact. plus, michilin has a tire that grip latterally up to 1g, so this is not that unlikely, i like the science behind your answer, but you did not apply all of the factors that are in play.
tyrsabeck 1 week ago
@tyrsabeck
there is no downforce when torque is applied at the wheel, where did you get that statement from?
and no, when i look at the bottom of this car in this vid, the tyres are about as wide as an SSC aero's or bugattis.
tyres dont heat up to temp in half a second, it takes many minutes. not within the time required to achieve 0-60 in 1s.
michelin pilot SS which Agera uses supposedly could pull as much as 1.4gs.
lastly, f1 tyres only achieve 2.5gs max of mechanical grip.
ASSHOLELA 1 week ago
@ASSHOLELA "there is no downforce when torque is applied at the wheel..."
I'm not saying you're necessarily right or wrong, but consider this: have you ever seen a set of traction bars? The way they work does generate downforce against the tires (through the axial housing) when torque is applied to the tires.
Also weight transfer during a hard launch can effectively generate a downforce against the tires on a rwd car. Picture a wheel stand on a drag car.
177SCmaro 2 days ago
@177SCmaro
that is not downforce per se. downforce is defined as an external force on the car which presses the car onto the ground, like aerodynamic. This result is internal, merely traction.
the traction bars help reduce wheelhop which turns traction intermittent. the net increase in traction is only modest.
ASSHOLELA 1 day ago
@ASSHOLELA When the axial whines up the leaf springs the snuber on the traction bar hit the frame of the car thus forcing the the axial, and thus the wheels, in a downward motion.
Force + downward motion = downforce. So if a car is properly equipped (not just traction bars do this) there IS downforce applied to the wheels when torque is applied. It still meets the basic definition of "downforce." Downforce isn't ONLY generated aerodynamically.
I like your supercar vids btw.
177SCmaro 1 day ago
@177SCmaro Dammit, I meant "axle" not "axial"
sorry it was pretty early in the morning when I typed that.
177SCmaro 1 day ago
@177SCmaro
that is not downforce. Downforce is defined as EXTERNAL FORCE, something not generated by the car. Something generated by the car itself, for example, the suspension against the ground, is a contributor towards basic traction.
ASSHOLELA 18 hours ago
@ASSHOLELA So a force generated in a downward motion is not downforce? Were is it written that downforce must be and can only be generated aerodynamically for it to be downforce?
When we talk about cars and we say "downforce", we do generally mean downward force generated aerodynamically against the body of the car, and thus ultimately the wheels of the car at speed. But that's not the only kind of downforce a car can generate. It can also generate it mechanically with torque.
177SCmaro 7 hours ago
@ASSHOLELA "Downforce is defined as EXTERNAL FORCE, something not generated by the car."
Okay, but even aerodynamic downforce IS generated by the car!! You don't have downforce until the car's engine generates power to propel the car forward! THEN the interaction of the car's body crashing against (relatively) stationary air creates aerodynamic downforce. Generating downforce against the wheels, both aerodynamically and mechanically, is ultimately generated by the engine.
177SCmaro 7 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ASSHOLELA "there is no downforce when torque is applied at the wheel..."
I'm not saying you're necessarily right or wrong, but consider this: have you ever seen a set of traction bars? The way they work does generate downforce against the tires (through the axial housing) when torque is applied to the tires.
Also weight transfer during a hard launch can effectively generate a downforce against the tires. Picture a wheel stand on a drag car.
177SCmaro 2 days ago
Well, it's not a production car after what he's done to it, so it's not eligible for the "world's fastest car" title. Also, he's fitted nitrous, which is as good as cheating.
AutoJew 1 year ago
check how cheap the petrol is there! It's now 121.9
conz078 1 year ago
@conz078 haha
Jamiepoop123 1 year ago
wicked hair
davidtennant4evahot 1 year ago
That dudes hair is hilarious.
jimbo98z 1 year ago
Bad video sync ... and a Top Fuel Dragster in NHRA competition can do 0-100 in .83 seconds.
CooleGuy 1 year ago
@CooleGuy
We're talking about road legal here, shit, I could say a missile does 0-20,000mph in 5 seconds. We all know that's just a stupid comparison though.
MageKing289IsBack 1 year ago
it might reach 60 in 1 second
but it'll take hours to get the voice in this video to sync
Vintage772 1 year ago
9.3L ouch i thought my 6.2 camaro was bad
poskyflyer 1 year ago
what a crock.
fuxbox 1 year ago
Sadly this is not the world's fastest car. I lived overseas with filthy rich Arabs my entire life. 2k hp is unbelievable, but, my buddies who are Arabs pimed a BMW to max 2.5k horses. 80$ car + 'X' amount of money is > this guy. Don't question Dubai's royal family's cash
enh4life 1 year ago
@enh4life just goes to show ya dont need 'X' amounts of cash
aaronsuncle 1 year ago
And his wife left him
iTzDaStig 1 year ago
0-60 in 1 second? thats faster than the speed of graviry
mentallyexplosive 2 years ago
wow out of sync a bit? holy fuck
wasup23tube 2 years ago
is this 5th gear
1337gam3r07 2 years ago 2
Thats English engineering for you, the best, Caterham does 0-60 in fewer than 3 secs, and any super car would struggle to do that. We also make Westfield, Rolls Royce, Bentley, Morgan, AC and MG!
oxlel001 2 years ago
@oxlel001 And don't forget the ariel atom!
Brian93glynn 2 years ago
Oh yes, fare dues. I think it might find it hard to beat this car anyway. It would be a close race.
oxlel001 2 years ago
lol why would anyone race it at the drags?
iLOVEhairyASSHOLES 2 years ago 17
lp640 1/4=10.4 sec....fuck...this is faster ._.
aleksandarfriscic 2 years ago
Its apples and oranges a buggatti can go 250 this cant
Youradumbassbarnes 2 years ago 2
they mean 0-60 this thing would rape a bugatti in 1/4 drg rce
tennisstar523 2 years ago
No shit thats why I said apples and oranges, these guys constantly say ITS FASTER. and its the FASTEST street legal car, when the Bugatti veyron was only supposed to be the fastest top speed.
Youradumbassbarnes 2 years ago
Ok thats nice. But buggatti would rape this in top speed and around a track. And I would rather drive in a nice smooth, comfortable, slick ride then a smoking, loud, piece of metal, which looks like its about to breakdown any second. Speaking of breaking down. It's an American muscle car with 2,200 horsepower built by an ordinary auto tech. Sounds really reliable. 9.3L V8. Boy when will they ever learn? Gas mileage shot to hell. Anybody who would buy this for 100,000 get what they deserved.
reign1222 2 years ago
dude its not a track car its does drag races rofl im saying the bugatti would get violated in a 1/4 mile drag race
tennisstar523 2 years ago
And Im saying the bugatti would rape it at high speeds, I can still be comfortable and take corners, and it will still work at the end of the day. Wow +1 for the gaz guzzling piece of metal. +6 for the Veyron.
reign1222 2 years ago
bugatti is shit looks like a VW bug its probably modeled after it aswell id rather have a ccx..sure it would rape it t high speeds but please tell me where you can go 407 km/h?
tennisstar523 2 years ago
@tennisstar523 not really a fair argument, you wouldn't bring your 'ccx' anywhere near the limit as well
jeminiany222 1 year ago
eurosnobs like yourself do not understand the attraction these cars have to people that enjoy these cars. It does not get driven daily, its a 7 second car! comparing it to the Bugatti is a retarded idea. they are impossible to see them in the same light. Think about it. Bugattis' car is 800 grand worth of car, yet if you put 800 thousand DOLLARS to a car, you would probably have 500 thousand left over because you would have bought everything imagineable. I would rather build my own car, really
Target262 2 years ago
ok then do it
reign1222 2 years ago
yeah buddy, got no more facts to say so you resort to a comment like that. In all reality, your spending 500,000 on the car, and another 500,000 for the name. sure a bugattis nice, I like em. but I dont like trolls like you talking shit about stuff you dont understand.
Target262 2 years ago
You don't understand. It takes more then just increasing the bore of the engine to create a car like a bugatti. If you actually did research the W16 in Bugatti actually makes 3,000 hp. Only 1000 is transferred to the wheels. 1000 to the cooling system. 1000 to w/e. There's a reason why they did that. So the car would run smoothly. I would like to have my nice interior, and not smell my exhaust. You pay for speed, luxury, reliability, technology, sophistication, style, and quality.
reign1222 2 years ago
@reign1222 Don't feel too bad. Even though this is the dumbest comment here, it's certainly not the only dumb thing said. Seriously, 1000 HP directed to the cooling system? I needed a good laugh, and that was it.
nairda2300 1 year ago
"yeah buddy, got no more facts to say so you resort to a comment like that"
i hope you realise that you just completely changed your argument.
you're getting upset and angry over it. and you've just started fighting 'reign1222's battle.
Hazaronova339 2 years ago
I can see what your saying.. I did get a little choked with him. I just dont understand people like him.
Target262 2 years ago
@Target262 the veryon is sold at a loss to the company, its done as a PROJECT. Name? My arse man, you're paying the engineers for the solutions, the parts, and they're still giving bits of it away after that.
toasterder 1 year ago
lol the veyron uses 40.4 litres/100km (5.82mpg) in city driving.
do you really think it uses less than the victor?
Hazaronova339 2 years ago
ok, i hate ppl who say "oh this is the fastest car ever.. im like no!... i want the fastest PRODUCTIION VEHICLE,,, NOT FUNNY CARS
acdcsrs 2 years ago
you want the fastest production car, the bugatti veyron is it :)
Duckyrox2b182 2 years ago
1988 callaway hammer went 1 MPH faster than a Veryon17 years ago how impressive is that??
sirlonghair 2 years ago
bmxridershiz it's completely the opposite
jcgamer892 2 years ago
Funny, ITS CALLED A DRAG CAR There Every where in America that ant fast try 8000 hp way faster
Chuckq1 2 years ago
they mean fastest street legal 0-60
InFuXionZ 2 years ago
Yes, but other drag cars aren't street legal - the point here is that this thing kicked asses of every single hypercar in the world - bugatti, SSc ultimate Aero and so on... respect, even though we're only talking about plain axeleration from a standstill...
OOLWprufKW 2 years ago
theres always one!
jasonswindon 2 years ago
i bet you he has to drive in very high gears to keep this down. lol if he sips the accelerator then that could be deadly lol
bmxridershiz 2 years ago
ultimate aero tt>veyron
american muscle
rhickman7292 2 years ago
The ultimate aero is not american muscle. Sure, it's made by an american producer and with an american engine, but other than that, it is a road going super car.
FrenchToastd 2 years ago
right and because its all american with the classic american v8 its not an american muscle car. you dont make sense
Auggiedog2125 2 years ago
A muscle car would be a Mustang, a GTO, a Camaro, etc. The SSC Aero is a mid-engine sports car not a front-engine "muscle" car.
FrenchToastd 2 years ago
it cant be considered american muscle because its a super car??? laugh
it is american muscle
drsta84 2 years ago 2
American muscle is a fuckin muscle car for straight like 1/4 mile. nOt track or top speed.
The ultamate aero wasnt supposed to eba msucle car but a track car, with a high top speed.
Youradumbassbarnes 2 years ago
lol seriously, muscle IS NOT the aero, nowhere near it
Hookem12595 2 years ago
Who cares if a veyron could kick his ass in the long run. He built it for the quarter mile its all about low end speed. It should just be apprieated for what he has built and not complaining and comparing.....
mxmaster999 2 years ago
I have the original car - Opel (Vauxhall) Rekord 1967 4 door sedan :)
snupcho 2 years ago
try taking this vs a veyron around a track, this piece of shit would take longer then a civic.
tctk1 2 years ago
A dragstrip and a track are two completely different worlds...
dan9209 2 years ago 2
true, but on a drag strip, i would laugh at the damn thing, who waists half their life working on a car that used to do 0-60 in 9.3 and make it like 2.0? buy a damn zo6 or zr1 and spend a good 10 grand and tune it properly and there you go. instead of waisting tens of thousands of dollars...
TheReanimator30 2 years ago
There is no fun in just throwing money out and getting w/e you want, You can have Pride you built something and you have done something great and different. Just saying :)
KV1412 2 years ago
veyron is pretty shitty on the track as well, i mean compared for money... get a gt-r hahaha or i dunno if u seem to be so rich.. ferrari fxx with slicks
mongoosecage 2 years ago
i remember watching this on t.v...
devestationn 2 years ago
i sec...damn..i can't belive it lol.This car rocks
uskatycb 3 years ago
I dont get it... is it 1 second or 7.6 seconds????
alexbballboy 3 years ago
1 second to 60, quarter of a mile in 7.6
Zlyzer 3 years ago
Things got really serious when he added some stickers.
bchin86 3 years ago
i know it's SSR. i typed it wrong. and you might be right on the accelerating and decelerating but that is not how the fastest is determined. they take a PRODUCTION car and run it on a dyno then run it on a set strip one way then back to cancel out wind resistance. the SSR is the fastest production car b =y top speed.
hallcb 3 years ago
The Veyron isn't even the fastest production car anymore. It's just expensive as all get out. CCR Ultimate Aero is the fastest production car in the world.
hallcb 3 years ago
Theres no CCR Ultimare Aero, theres SSC*. And its uglier then a Veyron and slover to 60. Your CCR is 2.8 Veyron 2.4
It is the fastest accelerating and decelerating production car in the world.
lihtster2 3 years ago
I still want a Veyron over that anyday.
reign1222 3 years ago 2
Yeah, the Veyron has something emotional about it going and while it may not be as quick as that, I'd walk right past that car any day to hop into the Veyron.
Zlyzer 3 years ago
You pay for reliability, quality, luxury, style, as well as speed and performance. I want the entire package.
reign1222 3 years ago
but for a quick race... i'll choose this beast!
upbeatmantis86 2 years ago
if you're a mechanic like this guy, there's no reason why not to have one. Any reliability issues he could fix himself, considering he pretty much built the monster
DarkSyclone 2 years ago
i definitly agree
TheReanimator30 2 years ago
i bet u , i'd put my money on this.. the Veyron will kick his ass on the long run. I think so.
drbos 2 years ago
they veyron would not just kick his ass, it would rip him a neww asshole, fuck this things garbage why would u spend so much on something that cant e
ven do the fuji speedway or the suzuka? drag racing? lol its shit, dont understand the point, so what, u got a fast car, (straight line) but u turn and u lose all fucking control and go slipping all the way to fucking china before stopping.
TheReanimator30 2 years ago
skyline r33 gt-r or slr for me
mongoosecage 2 years ago
thats fuckin mad!!!
fghcdd 3 years ago
WHat the hell is that thing behind the car??>
like a butt plug or something??
anbrin 3 years ago
its a parachute.
theres some rule that any car that drives a 1/4 over 160 mph or summat needs a parachute to stop for safety and such
supernaturalguru 3 years ago
This is bullshit my daddies space shuttle can go faster than this, all i have to do is lap dance in front of daddy and bam, i gotz the keys to the space shuttle!!
Shoppinf for everybody
anbrin 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
my dad has a BUGATTI VEYRON and it takes this car out any time and any day.. by speed, looks and handling !!!
03900887 3 years ago
in internete land my dad's custem built ferrari that was sighed by enzo ferrari himself on his death bead would kick youre dad's veyron.
NUTRIOR 3 years ago 2
I have a small penis
anbrin 3 years ago 55
and im sure your dad does...
tomobomxbl 3 years ago
9.3 liters, thats fucking insane yo
IMaGANSTERyo 3 years ago
it looked american lol
jakeditz50 3 years ago
rofl
things got reaally serious when he added some stickers.
thedeagle2 3 years ago
haha lol
essex9207 3 years ago
is this for real holmes?
Piwieshootsyou 3 years ago
fer sure sherlock!
PaulyCracker 3 years ago