Isn't laser a special kind of light that have the property of reflecting at every direction with a intense beam. Laser = Compressed light, it works like water in a pipeline that gets thinner. when it reach it's target it sprays out at ever direction! So, the light have to move in a vortex pattern in quantum scale (proven by extended horizontal light beam after increasing the distance from the slit to the projection plate, every vortex expands, and get some help of the slit that creates a wake).
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
35 people don't understand what the fuck this video was all about!... the rest of us don't either but still liked the video! Quantum physics you gota love it!
@xenoepist Firmly apply the chalk tip on the chalkboard, point the chalk, at a steep angle, in the direction you are drawing. (if you drawing in this direction ----> , it should look like this \ .
You'll have to mess with the angle to get it right. You can also do this with your finger tip drawing along a tabletop.
I got a question, what happens when you make the slit shorter and shorter after u make it thinner and thinner? does it appear as a large circle or does it just look like a dot. that would help a lot to solve this don't you think.
@maplebayou1 i see. buy my question was "after" you make it so thin...you make the slit shorter. then what will happen. after the slit is shortened enough, the projected image is in wide state. if you now squeeze down the slit vertically now, what happens. either the projected image would be like a large circle or it would get back to dot. that's what i'm asking.
are we sure we see all the particles ? maybe those laser beams have some particle that we haven't observed yet that is a bit far away from the laser beam and is connected to the beam. maybe we think it's just one particle but maybe there's another particle that we haven't observed yet that hits the wall and that affects the laser beam's direction.
atleast this person is actually talking about QM and not some new-age quantum conciousness spiritual bullshit, youytube is full of shitty fake QM videos
The cop says, k this guy is obviously high I'm gonna search the vehicle. He finds a box in the back with a dead cat in it. Do you know there's a dead cat in here?
Okay, Quantum physics are BIZARRE indeed... if there's ANYONE out here, and I literally mean ANYONE, no brilliant physicist excluded, who truly understands this, I will eat my own HAT! (oh, and its a big one!...) Oh yes, they can use the theory and such, but nobody really knows what is going on, why its going on and such.
Just because quantum physics is able of amazing me over, and over again, I do not fear it, but love it! It might be strange and hard, but there is nothing more mind expanding..
so Heisenberg is speeding on the freeway. cop pulls him over, asks him "fellow, you know how fast you're driving?". He responds "nope, but I'm pretty sure of where I am" XD
There is something to how light as it gets further from its source of origins widens' Ok we have the fundamental principles here so how do we define physical object experience without mathematics? Logical reasoning? Its does so now lest simply assume that we can harness this energy form an make it more concentraited and make weapons out of it using the sun as a souce of energy. as is the project in california is in its final stage as a new energy source'
Unification of Isolated science and GOD particle exist within Human body which is CERN Laboratory of Nature.for details see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA and read article on all voices.com -certainty-tool-is-higgin-boson-or-god-particle-which-exist-in-human-body.We have already developed next generation easy to learn unified science.world scientist are welcome to see and test FIT-Future Imaging Tool technology
This experiment is just polarizing light. Some wave paths of photons make it through the entrance of the slit and then the photons start reflecting on the sides of the slit until they come out on the other side. Watch this example of aiming circle polarized light towards a slit:
@1995a1995z Nope. It's reflection and polarization. There is nothing uncertain in this experiment. Try putting polarized sunglasses between the light source and the slit.
Is it not photons gaing spin from interaction with the slot causing tangental trajectories that make the beam wider, same reason the double slit experiment shows wave/interference pattern ?
I bow down to astrophysicists and quantum physicists. This shit just blows my mind and the fact that they're able to, first, show this with math, and then (occasionally) verify it experimentally is fucking astounding. I will never understand most of these concepts and I'm always glad and appreciative that there are others out there who dedicate their lives and brilliant genius to further our understanding and application of these subjects. I'm NOT WORTHY!
@nickharvey7 an artist? I think you might want to become a scientist if you want to persuade people that your new theory is correct..
1 question: why do you think this uncertainty is linked to the uncertainty of the future?
by the way, I don't think there is any uncertainty, I think we just experience an illusion of choice and uncertainty but our 4D-timeline is already fixed
@Rboysblaster Because we have 4π in the equation of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π representing three dimensions of a sphere for the uncertainty of position and momentum. But when it comes to time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π we only have two dimensions a future and a past 2π.
@Rboysblaster In this theory we have a process of continuous creation or change formed by the quantum wave particle function collapsing and reforming. We see and feel this continuous alternating between wave and particle as the continuous flow of time that will have the dimension of spacetime.
He is stating that instead of becoming a line PARALLEL to the slit, it goes perpendicular to it. (What I can infer from the video, don't quote me)
You squeeze a water house horizontally, the water spreads horizontally, squeeze vertically, it spreads vertically, you cant squeeze it horizontally and aspect it to spread vertically can you?
@shawnaw2 I'm afraid not. The only reason the water spreads out is that you are deforming the tip of the hose. If you simply reduce the size of the hose, the water will not spread out less, not more. The behavior of the light is based on very different principles.
4-20-2012 You got a job? Go on strike until they legalize cannabis! It's the only way to get full scale recreational legalization! Be the change! All you have to do is spread the word to everyone you know and every website you visit! Start a chainmail, get pro pot organizations involved. Blog about it. Like it. Thumbs up this message everywhere you see it! Let this message grow like a weed! We are the Marijuana Nation! On 4-20-2012 don't go to work instead toke up and protest! WE ARE DEFIANT!
@JewleBrews Yeah, its the interference pattern that emerges even if its only 1 photon being fired at a single time. I think that usually involves two slits, not one. Not sure. But even so, the interference pattern is absolutely bizarre.
@jonpanoff Yes, as long as we understand that diffraction is a word we usually use to describe the behavior of classical waves, and photons are not classical waves.
So, in other words Everything you see with the eyes has a probability of uncertainty, that is why the bible says, Men see yet are blind, Men see yet are deceived.
Bahh!! You retard...based on the current updated quantum electrodynamic research photons do so move in such as a particle-wave duality. Photons have the dynamics wich behave like wave and particles.
I have to say, i'm pretty sure that the uncertainty principle applies to pairs of measureable quantities (and or vectors) not both to paired position.
The light is spreading our horizontally because it is cohernet synthetic laser light, which is not like all other lights as is claimed by this psyentist. The effect is similar to a pin hole camera, accept he is using synthetic light which expands horizontally rather than spherically like natural light would. Laser light has this special effect. The closed down slit becomes the equator which divides the incomming light into expanding light, just like a pin hole camera. Not counterintuitive at all
@bambamboom2 We still only observe photons as particles, not as waves. Words like diffraction and interference are our attempts to reach for classical wave analogies for phenomena that do not behave classically.
I'm making short comedy skit videos and am partial towards physics and math humor. I'm going around to popular physics/math videos promoting to try to find a crowd that can understand the jokes. If you have some time please check out my channel and the video subatomic particle party, or particle project. Thanks for your time.
@iloverock1209 It isn't an either/or situation. Diffraction is simply a word we use to describe the phenomenon from a classical wave perspective. QM also uses wave equations. However, we see the same kind of result with small chunks of matter, and light clearly has particle characteristics. Classical diffraction cannot deal with this, which is where QM and Heisenberg uncertainty come in.
@kristijanadrian I think I may have to go back to school to truly appreciate what you are suggesting. .However, I guess the bigger picture is, time itself is irrelevant at that capacity
Best physics teacher ever. The passion in his explanation is amazing. He gets exciting all over the Uncertainty principle just like a little kid getting an ice cream. Now that is just what being a real physicists is all about!
I've made a comedy video aimed for people that understand particle physics. Please check out my channel for the video - Subatomic Particle Party. I'd like to do more like this if it is popular.
Hey thanks for contributing helpful content. We'll be featuring intelligent and helpful people like yourself on our network. Drop me a line if you'd like to collaborate on any topic, and have a chance to be featured on our channel.
You gotta love the guy's enthusiasm in the video. Wish I could take one of his classes...(although I'd probably have to go back and relearn my times tables first)
@DoctorLawyerWhatever Spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Photons "break down" when passed through non-linear crystals. Not good for your photons, but handy if you want to conduct delayed choice quantum eraser experiments.
What if you make it narrow but you just have no idea what the measurement is? Does it still spread out horizontally? It seems like some other classical thing would explain light spreading out horizontally even has the horizontal slit gets narrower like maybe that's just exactly the amount of room light has in that direction. Because particles like photons aren't suppose to act like waves when your observing them, so I don't see how the properties of a wave could apply to this anyway.
@steeveyneon Contrary to popular myth, Heisenberg's principle is not about measurement in the sense of a human being obtaining information about the system. It merely requires, in this context, that as the position of a particle is more constrained, its momentum must be less so, and vice versa. It doesn't matter in the least if anyone "knows" the width of the slit. You could hide that part of the apparatus from view and get the same result.
@steeveyneon As for the particle/wave issue, each photon strikes the screen at one and only one location with a discrete amount of energy. It is in this sense that photons are detected as particles. This does not negate diffraction and other wave phenomena. The color of the light itself is an expression of wave phenomena that we obviously observe.
What if you make it narrow but you just have no idea what the measurement is? Does it still spread out horizontally? It seems like some other classical thing would explain light spreading out horizontally even has the horizontal slit gets narrower like maybe that's just exactly the amount of room light has in that direction. Because particles like photons aren't suppose to act like waves when your observing them, so I don't see how the properties of a wave could apply anyway.
If a partials time is determined by the speed in which a partial travels like photons, then does anyone have a theory or answer for this? We observe an object 200 light years away. Time slows down at or near the speed of light, right? Then is the light we see truly 200 years old? Or is the light much younger making the objects we see closer than we believe? Serious question
Spaghetmonster = Extra dimensions + expanding space + curving space + drawing force + dark matter + dark energy. Do you believe, there is spaghetmonster? i dont believe.
I know, there is only one and same energy and space who is nothing. Some areas energy are more density what outside that areas. This areas where energy are more density, is absorbs energy all a time and thats why it is expanding. All quarks and particle like photons, expanding all a time in space who is nothing! LOVE
@hornetobiker If this were the case, we would see a larger spread as soon as the edges of the slit cut off the edges of the beam. The spread would certainly not continue to decrease as the slit narrowed, then "inexplicably" begin to increase dramatically as it reached a fraction of a millimeter.
@hornetobiker your absolutely right! photon's do only travel one way but so does water,until there"s a disruption in its gravity.in this case the slit scatters the photons and only the available slit transfers the light.this is not even worthy of scientific discussion.
I know the diffraction explanation of this phenomena but this is the first time seen it explained with Heisenberg uncertainty. For this to fit uncertainty theory wouldn't you have to be considering the light beam as a single particle?
@cnidoblast Well, you're actually asking a question that goes to the core of Quantum Physics. Are they particles or waves? After David Bohm posited the magical "quatum wave", someone posited that everything exists as "wavicles" [I forget who, now]. That's where superpositions and wave functions come into play. It breaks down into really complex math, actually, to answer that question.
@cmatrix4761 yeah I'm doing a bit of quantum mechanics for my spectroscopy class and the Schrodinger equation confuses the hell outta me. I saw something when I was heavily sleep deprived after a meth binge a few years ago that really got me thinking about all this. It was a bit of plastic that was flapping like insect wings. It was like my brain couldn't determine its exact position so it existed in a load of different positions simultaneously. Kinda like an electron in an orbital.
@cmatrix4761 if quantum entanglement really can be produced in the lab then I think its just a matter of time before its scaled up and we come up with technology utilising the phenomenon. We could create wormholes with this phenomenon because if I walk into a tunnel that is located here and the other end of the tunnel is located on the moon but is connected via entanglement then I could walk through it. We've a bit of a ways to go from subatomic particles though lol.
@cnidoblast It is a neat phenomenon, but it can't really be used that way. Entanglement still affects local phenomenon, albeit on only one of multiple entangled quantum objects. But, it is a really exciting advancement. Right now, in fact, quantum chips are being researched to vastly increase processor bandwidth and it could, within the next decade, be used to break the lag barrier in long range communications.
Well it just doesn't make any sense does it? If this experiment proves anything, it's probably the fact that God exists. And that he clearly makes up the rules of physics as he goes along.
@camerandpick That's a wimp's answer to the experiment. Heisenberg was brave in positing that we can't know everything, but just because we don't know it doesn't mean it belongs to a God. Nor does it mean that we can't ever know it -- we've grasped classical physics for less than 400 years, and Quatum physics for less than 100; but, we always master what we set out to understand (well, except God, evidently).
@cmatrix4761 I like the argument, it basically puts forward the notion that anything is possible and man is master of all. But I also like the idea of God. I'm not so hot with mathematics so to me, God is the best solution...
@camerandpick Fair enough -- I believe everyone has the right to believe what they want. But, belief in God as the solution without the effort of seeking out the solution isn't faith - it's blind faith, which is ignorance. We should always try to find or understand the solution; if, upon the effort, finding or comprehending it is still beyond our grasp, only then do we have the right, as rational people, to say "I just don't get it - it must be God". That's my belief, anyway :)
@akahina666 hehe my position hits right at the heart of a really emotional issue for most people; I've found people usually resent those positions when it makes them really think -- thx though :D
And in response to your question -- believe it or not, I'm Taoist. I don't believe or not believe in God; I feel that if there's a God, I'll leave him to his own devices and try to live a life, myself, that I believe is correct. BTW, that's harder than it sounds ;p
@camerandpick Oh one addendum - I didn't posit that Man is master of all; I was merely conveying that we don't know and haven't efforted understanding of everything yet. In other words, I was implying that we should give ourselves some time to understand more before we hide behind our own lack of comprehension.
@camerandpick not neccesarily you cannot answer the unkknown by saying god exists and that he is doind this thats obsurd! we still have a lot to learn yet mate! hopefully the hadron collider will shed some LIGHT on this! get it err. ... ok whatever.
Just think of momentum as being the the area that the particle can sweep. In this instance narrowing the gap yields tighter position location, but in turn the area that the particle can sweep because much larger.
@ashergtk As the slit constrains the positions of the photons more and more at that point, their momenta are less and less specified. Momentum is a vector, which means it has a direction. Therefore the points at which the photons hit the screen must spread out. Notice that they do not spread out in the vertical direction, only along the axis on which their positions are being constrained at the slit.
@maplebayou1 from what you've explained i've understood it this way, tell me if i'm wrong: so while you're decreasing the size of the slit, you're determining the momentum more accurately but then the position (on the screen) becomes less accurate?
I've always thought that this was just the wave property of light where it diffracts..
@maplebayou1 from what you've explained i've understood it this way, tell me if i'm wrong: so while you're decreasing the size of the slit, you're determining the momentum more accurately but then the position (on the screen) becomes less accurate?
I've always thought that this was just the wave property of light where it diffracts..
As slit becomes narrower ...the photon's location on the x dimensional plane (considering that lies on the same plane the slits are) gets more and more precise ie to say the uncertainity of the photon's location gets more and more determined.since uncertainity principal states that uncertainity of photon inversely proportionate to uncertainty of momentum.photon's momentum in the x direction becomes more uncertain ie to say a proportion of photons in the beam gets varied hence the spread
One day aliens will come to earth. And they will come to an atheist and say hello we are from a different world. And what if they have a religion or set of beliefs you do not? Will you insult theirs as well as our own even though you risk wars we cannot win?! That is when human beings will meet god, or when everyone, and I do mean everyone asks to see god, and for the first time, HE WILL COME TO US. When he does, please show your respect and bow to him. He's saved us countless times.
@AurumenK So, you believe God of the bible is an alien who... believes in a different god? More lulz for us. Dude, you are retarded, and besides, you just now supported my claim that religion brings wars. No atheist -ever- started a war because they were told god exists. Tell me now, really, you are 12, aren't you? Probably you prayed for an xbox and got it huh? If I were you, I'd thank my parents, not suck my pedo pastor's cock, but to each their own, you probably enjoy it you little faggot.
you can say oh yes I believe in nothing and your stupid. Atheism proves nothing and is like a plague of hatred that will never stop you claim to believe in science, well so do I and I am a christian. To all of you atheists, repent, not to a religion but to yourselves for you walk the path of causing wars and ignorance. Just because I believe something you don't, because you didn't get the Xbox you asked god for christmas. Atheists are going to cause more wars in the future ones we won'twin
@AurumenK Uh- actually you got your shit wrong there dude, religion never caused a war because someone argued over it, religion was the one who started the wars by attacking people with different beliefs. Crusades and the like. Back in the dark ages none even THOUGHT of claiming god didn't exist because then? They were burned at the stake, if anything religion has brought death and destruction, look at Hitler, he used Christianity and thats a historical event. You fucktard, that's beyond a game.
@AurumenK Only a fool believes all atheists are hate mongers; just like only a fool believes all people who go to church really believe in loving their neighbors. To spread a message of hate about a particular people in such a sweeping generalization is, well, spreading a message of hate :D
by the way when a religious fanatic complains to me that evoloution is just a theory.. i just say going to the moon was just a THEORY and then we DID IT. the same math "in general" is used to theorise evoloution.
Evolution is just a theory. But so is Einstein's theory on Gravitation. The one thing I will say about the theory that God exists, is that at the present time, it cannot be proven to be true, nor can it be proven to be false. Only observations that are testable can be subjected to the scientific method. Hence, so-called religious fanatics need to have faith that God exists.
@RonBurgundy161 Heh -- funny thing about religion and science: most people have no grasp of what science really is, so they have faith in it that it is correct; most people have no idea what God really is, so they have faith in it that it is correct. Science and religion are two sides of the same coin, at least from that perspective.
Spaghetmonster = Extra dimensions + expanding space + curving space + drawing force + dark matter + dark energy. Do you believe, there is spaghetmonster? i dont believe.
I know, there is only one and same energy and space who is nothing. Some areas energy are more density what outside that areas. This areas where energy are more density, is absorbs energy all a time and thats why it is expanding. All quarks and particle like photons, expanding all a time in space who is nothing! LOVE
@vlatin1 Well, technically, the General Theory of Relativity is a misnomer. Einstein wasn't positing that Gravity actually is a warping of spacetime; he was positing that, mathematically, it could be treated that way. To understand this connection, you have to go back and read the full paper he wrote on the Special Theory of Relativity. Anyway, my point is that it wasn't really a theory so much as a mathematical filter. Physicists often make the mistake of proffering one as the other.
@THESOULbornold Actually evolution was proven wrong, apparently life cannot come from unlife. If you have two steaks one with no bacteria at all and one with bacteria, and you place the one with no bacteria and put it in a sealed jar no bacteria will grow on that steak proven science. therfore there could not have been primordial ooze, because there wasn't any bacteria to grow and form other things. We did however come from space, apparently there was bacteria on an asteroid that hit the ear
@AurumenK Other than suggesting we are aliens and proving that you are a fagot your comment didn't help much. You talk about a process that takes millions of years. You know how life can come into existence? Well, let me educate you a bit, atoms use the weak force to hold each other together and slowly connect and make 'elements' or what we have on our periodic table. Those in turn can cause chemical reactions with one another and RANDOMLY create life at one point. YES RANDOMLY!
@Razgrits Why do you assault me with your words? Don't be angry when someone thinks differently then you I am not attacking you, and I disproved you right there, the atoms were still there in the jar oxygen and the atoms that made up the steak no bacteria came from it. Nothing is random, read up on chaos theory then you can tell me what happened.
@AurumenK Dude, you can show your retardation all you want. But don't mix up the chaos theory, you probably meant the second law of thermodynamics. So, let me end this simply; Earth is an open system mofo. So, with that your closed/open jar shit comes to an end. Chaos theory supports randomness as from small, little changes, big events can take place. That's CT in a nutshell. If you support that I don't see how you can believe in god and not in random abiogenesis on earth.
@AurumenK That's the jar of peanut butter argument. The earth is not a sealed jar. It has been bombarded with space debris for billions of years. That stuff contained all kinds of exotic materials and who knows what kind of chemical processes took place on the early earth. Those conditions do not exist today,so you can't say abiogenesis couldn't have happened based on that it doesn't happen today.
@THESOULbornold Ah but you see, we didn't go to the moon. The landing was filmed underground in a secret lair that the Illuminati rented from the mole people, who were also Freemasons.
@THESOULbornold So because you said that your assumption was correct when you have not witnessed nor seen, you get angry and call them names? Religion only serves to make better people and if it doesn't then it should not be. This is why atheists shouldn't be here. All you do is spread hatred thats why the taliban attacked the us. Don't bother answering this email you will just come up with some insulting comment about how you are right and religion is stupid. at least christians help.
this is not that nonintuitive uhm when he closed the slit the light was caught on the edge of it and slung outward by the interferance of the sides closing in on it. the light reacted to the meatal being closed in on it and was slingshot outward maybe gravity but some force interacting with it.a colaberation between the light and the contact of the meatal. it doesnt seem that mysterious to me. whiling the light outward left and right??
I thought that ever since Einstein , nothing is "just a theory" anymore .... First people probably laughed at einstein's theory ... until they saw a mushroom cloud evaporate every damn piece of then meaningless matter within it's radius !!! Also most of modern chemistry, electronics (semiconductors) and computerscience works largely based on quantummechanics
woooah i have never thought off this principle in a such "daily" way, just thought it for single particles
JRabba1995 3 days ago
Did that chalk board just fart?
gillywibble 1 week ago
And if a Tea-Party member saw this, they would say it is a proof that god exists and the earth is 10,000 years old.
I truly believe they are beginning to devolve and you will be able to see webbed toes, feet and gill slits beginning to emerge.
TugsN 1 week ago
Isn't it possible that the edges of the mechanical aperture is refracting the light?
djroozl 2 weeks ago
Isn't laser a special kind of light that have the property of reflecting at every direction with a intense beam. Laser = Compressed light, it works like water in a pipeline that gets thinner. when it reach it's target it sprays out at ever direction! So, the light have to move in a vortex pattern in quantum scale (proven by extended horizontal light beam after increasing the distance from the slit to the projection plate, every vortex expands, and get some help of the slit that creates a wake).
HuMaHuMHuMno1 2 weeks ago
why???????????????
whojiayi 1 month ago
This guy cant draw for shit
MrElloco1979 1 month ago
Nice video!
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
nickharvey7 1 month ago
Walter Lewin Idolo!
Bocha666 1 month ago
35 people don't understand what the fuck this video was all about!... the rest of us don't either but still liked the video! Quantum physics you gota love it!
krillthefish 2 months ago 3
IT'S BIZZAR NO ONE EVEN MENTIONED HIS NAME HERE>>> PROF. WALTER LEWIN
rickyzmkuo 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is retarted doesnt explain anything
2112mbell 2 months ago
Tricky, but I finally managed to masturbate to this video.
Lukacevic 2 months ago 9
@Lukacevic lol wtf
Cramerica66 2 months ago
How does he do that? I mean, the dotted line. That is even more bizarre!
xenoepist 2 months ago
@xenoepist Firmly apply the chalk tip on the chalkboard, point the chalk, at a steep angle, in the direction you are drawing. (if you drawing in this direction ----> , it should look like this \ .
You'll have to mess with the angle to get it right. You can also do this with your finger tip drawing along a tabletop.
hambenski 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that is a fat ass piece of chalk
WontonSandwich 2 months ago
I got a question, what happens when you make the slit shorter and shorter after u make it thinner and thinner? does it appear as a large circle or does it just look like a dot. that would help a lot to solve this don't you think.
D5932 3 months ago
@D5932 As you squeeze the opening down, the "dot" will get larger in the vertical direction just as it does in the horizontal shown above.
maplebayou1 2 months ago
@maplebayou1 i see. buy my question was "after" you make it so thin...you make the slit shorter. then what will happen. after the slit is shortened enough, the projected image is in wide state. if you now squeeze down the slit vertically now, what happens. either the projected image would be like a large circle or it would get back to dot. that's what i'm asking.
D5932 2 months ago
@D5932 You would see a large "circle."
maplebayou1 2 months ago
are we sure we see all the particles ? maybe those laser beams have some particle that we haven't observed yet that is a bit far away from the laser beam and is connected to the beam. maybe we think it's just one particle but maybe there's another particle that we haven't observed yet that hits the wall and that affects the laser beam's direction.
D5932 3 months ago
I WAS THE 1000 LIKE!!! HOOOORRRRAY SCIENCE!!!
jjjones32 3 months ago
atleast this person is actually talking about QM and not some new-age quantum conciousness spiritual bullshit, youytube is full of shitty fake QM videos
sidewaysfcs0718 3 months ago
Heisenberg was speeding along the highway when he got pulled over by a cop.
-Do you have any idea how fast you were going?
Heisenberg replied,
-No, but I can tell you exactly where I am.
TheSteady0 3 months ago 37
@TheSteady0
(Schroedinger is sitting next to him)
The cop says, k this guy is obviously high I'm gonna search the vehicle. He finds a box in the back with a dead cat in it. Do you know there's a dead cat in here?
-Well I do now! says Schroedinger
iriejoe 2 months ago 6
Scientist using imperial units like inches!?
WHAT!?
yoshinibble123 3 months ago 2
Okay, Quantum physics are BIZARRE indeed... if there's ANYONE out here, and I literally mean ANYONE, no brilliant physicist excluded, who truly understands this, I will eat my own HAT! (oh, and its a big one!...) Oh yes, they can use the theory and such, but nobody really knows what is going on, why its going on and such.
Just because quantum physics is able of amazing me over, and over again, I do not fear it, but love it! It might be strange and hard, but there is nothing more mind expanding..
BeylaKaythin 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so Heisenberg is speeding on the freeway. cop pulls him over, asks him "fellow, you know how fast you're driving?". He responds "nope, but I'm pretty sure of where I am" XD
NScott45 4 months ago
There is something to how light as it gets further from its source of origins widens' Ok we have the fundamental principles here so how do we define physical object experience without mathematics? Logical reasoning? Its does so now lest simply assume that we can harness this energy form an make it more concentraited and make weapons out of it using the sun as a souce of energy. as is the project in california is in its final stage as a new energy source'
DrFruedienslip 5 months ago
Unification of Isolated science and GOD particle exist within Human body which is CERN Laboratory of Nature.for details see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA and read article on all voices.com -certainty-tool-is-higgin-boson-or-god-particle-which-exist-in-human-body.We have already developed next generation easy to learn unified science.world scientist are welcome to see and test FIT-Future Imaging Tool technology
vk sonakia
unified field scientist
bhopal
INDIA
vksonakia@yahoo.co.in
vksonakia 5 months ago
except in cases of extreme gravity
MrWwxxyy 5 months ago
This experiment is just polarizing light. Some wave paths of photons make it through the entrance of the slit and then the photons start reflecting on the sides of the slit until they come out on the other side. Watch this example of aiming circle polarized light towards a slit:
youtube.com/watch?v=Z2nfN5qkLwQ
WearTheWhiteRobe 5 months ago
thats diffraction
1995a1995z 5 months ago
@1995a1995z Nope. It's reflection and polarization. There is nothing uncertain in this experiment. Try putting polarized sunglasses between the light source and the slit.
WearTheWhiteRobe 5 months ago
@WearTheWhiteRobe Polarization is diffraction -.-
1995a1995z 5 months ago
@1995a1995z Nope, polarization is simply blocking some of the photons in the light that hits the "polarizer". And light does not bend!
WearTheWhiteRobe 5 months ago
Narrower and Narrower and Narrower and Narrower and Narrower and wider and wider and wider and wider and wider and wider and wider ...
MsKatkat11 5 months ago
less predictable (to others) it will be. Are we seeing a reflection of our bio brain, which I believe has it's limit?
301703z708 5 months ago
This is all very well but much the same thing happens with waves in water and that isn't QM.
chrisofnottingham 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he's a good artist
BalkankaBre1 6 months ago
Is it not photons gaing spin from interaction with the slot causing tangental trajectories that make the beam wider, same reason the double slit experiment shows wave/interference pattern ?
optionsnone 6 months ago
I bow down to astrophysicists and quantum physicists. This shit just blows my mind and the fact that they're able to, first, show this with math, and then (occasionally) verify it experimentally is fucking astounding. I will never understand most of these concepts and I'm always glad and appreciative that there are others out there who dedicate their lives and brilliant genius to further our understanding and application of these subjects. I'm NOT WORTHY!
GliTCH11 6 months ago
Wow
Just Wow!
abumefak2 6 months ago
Bazdmeg... Ez kemény.
Mickekzon 6 months ago
Time is a direction.
You can ask Rob Bryanton.
BlatendCrude 6 months ago
0:36 - blackboard fart. LOL!
str3123 7 months ago
Interesting video! I am an artist on YouTube trying to promote my theory on the dynamics of light and time
This theory is based on just two simple postulates
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time itself
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event
nickharvey7 7 months ago
@nickharvey7 an artist? I think you might want to become a scientist if you want to persuade people that your new theory is correct..
1 question: why do you think this uncertainty is linked to the uncertainty of the future?
by the way, I don't think there is any uncertainty, I think we just experience an illusion of choice and uncertainty but our 4D-timeline is already fixed
Rboysblaster 7 months ago
@Rboysblaster Because we have 4π in the equation of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π representing three dimensions of a sphere for the uncertainty of position and momentum. But when it comes to time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π we only have two dimensions a future and a past 2π.
nickharvey7 7 months ago
@nickharvey7 but future and past on itself are no seperate dimensions
just like backward and forward aren't
time is the dimension making future and past possible
Rboysblaster 7 months ago
@Rboysblaster In this theory we have a process of continuous creation or change formed by the quantum wave particle function collapsing and reforming. We see and feel this continuous alternating between wave and particle as the continuous flow of time that will have the dimension of spacetime.
nickharvey7 7 months ago
Is not like squeezing a water hose?
braggsrt 7 months ago
@braggsrt
He is stating that instead of becoming a line PARALLEL to the slit, it goes perpendicular to it. (What I can infer from the video, don't quote me)
You squeeze a water house horizontally, the water spreads horizontally, squeeze vertically, it spreads vertically, you cant squeeze it horizontally and aspect it to spread vertically can you?
That is what this theory is about i guess?
shawnaw2 7 months ago
@shawnaw2 I'm afraid not. The only reason the water spreads out is that you are deforming the tip of the hose. If you simply reduce the size of the hose, the water will not spread out less, not more. The behavior of the light is based on very different principles.
maplebayou1 7 months ago
Comment removed
QuantumLogic1080 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
4-20-2012 You got a job? Go on strike until they legalize cannabis! It's the only way to get full scale recreational legalization! Be the change! All you have to do is spread the word to everyone you know and every website you visit! Start a chainmail, get pro pot organizations involved. Blog about it. Like it. Thumbs up this message everywhere you see it! Let this message grow like a weed! We are the Marijuana Nation! On 4-20-2012 don't go to work instead toke up and protest! WE ARE DEFIANT!
!
WiiLink89 7 months ago
hahaha photons are particles lol
sniperz18 8 months ago
this guy totally reminds me of this guy w-w-w-.youtube.com/watch?v=haAhdtDmsOw
dwilmer7 8 months ago
he forgot to mention the interference -.-
JewleBrews 8 months ago
@JewleBrews Yeah, its the interference pattern that emerges even if its only 1 photon being fired at a single time. I think that usually involves two slits, not one. Not sure. But even so, the interference pattern is absolutely bizarre.
mrjustin5 8 months ago
can't this observation be attributed to diffraction?
jonpanoff 8 months ago
@jonpanoff Yes, as long as we understand that diffraction is a word we usually use to describe the behavior of classical waves, and photons are not classical waves.
maplebayou1 8 months ago
@maplebayou1 all waves behave the same way
TehAl3X 8 months ago
@TehAl3X Right. However, particles, including photons, also exhibit non-wave characteristics.
maplebayou1 8 months ago
So, in other words Everything you see with the eyes has a probability of uncertainty, that is why the bible says, Men see yet are blind, Men see yet are deceived.
JesusNonEnviromental 8 months ago
bio+chem >> pyhsics
suck it physics
zapfaggot 8 months ago
Bahh!! You retard...based on the current updated quantum electrodynamic research photons do so move in such as a particle-wave duality. Photons have the dynamics wich behave like wave and particles.
Naltron69 8 months ago
DERP!
slowmopoke 8 months ago
I have to say, i'm pretty sure that the uncertainty principle applies to pairs of measureable quantities (and or vectors) not both to paired position.
jackofwack 9 months ago
@jackofwack There is a pair of observables involved, position and momentum.
maplebayou1 8 months ago
80% of the comments on here:
"im a smart ass and i KNOW hes wrong and im right because...etc etc"
fix520 9 months ago
If this guy calls it bizarre, than ITS FUCKING BIZARRE.
phatmike21 9 months ago 54
The light is spreading our horizontally because it is cohernet synthetic laser light, which is not like all other lights as is claimed by this psyentist. The effect is similar to a pin hole camera, accept he is using synthetic light which expands horizontally rather than spherically like natural light would. Laser light has this special effect. The closed down slit becomes the equator which divides the incomming light into expanding light, just like a pin hole camera. Not counterintuitive at all
77GSlinger 9 months ago
Anyone know the name of this documentary
earthtojanson 9 months ago
it goes wide because of wave interference. but how come observation doesnt collapse this wave?
bambamboom2 9 months ago
@bambamboom2 We still only observe photons as particles, not as waves. Words like diffraction and interference are our attempts to reach for classical wave analogies for phenomena that do not behave classically.
maplebayou1 9 months ago
I'm making short comedy skit videos and am partial towards physics and math humor. I'm going around to popular physics/math videos promoting to try to find a crowd that can understand the jokes. If you have some time please check out my channel and the video subatomic particle party, or particle project. Thanks for your time.
BendableCard 10 months ago
@iloverock1209 It isn't an either/or situation. Diffraction is simply a word we use to describe the phenomenon from a classical wave perspective. QM also uses wave equations. However, we see the same kind of result with small chunks of matter, and light clearly has particle characteristics. Classical diffraction cannot deal with this, which is where QM and Heisenberg uncertainty come in.
maplebayou1 10 months ago
@kristijanadrian I think I may have to go back to school to truly appreciate what you are suggesting. .However, I guess the bigger picture is, time itself is irrelevant at that capacity
MrJP2003 10 months ago
Isn't it a consequence of light diffraction that we all learned at school?
VIPLeague 10 months ago 2
Walter Lewin is a great professor!
A3R0SPACE054 10 months ago
Best physics teacher ever. The passion in his explanation is amazing. He gets exciting all over the Uncertainty principle just like a little kid getting an ice cream. Now that is just what being a real physicists is all about!
RTRVII 10 months ago
I've made a comedy video aimed for people that understand particle physics. Please check out my channel for the video - Subatomic Particle Party. I'd like to do more like this if it is popular.
BendableCard 10 months ago
Christopher Walken?
gboyishere 10 months ago
Beautiful.
grimtango5280 11 months ago
Hey thanks for contributing helpful content. We'll be featuring intelligent and helpful people like yourself on our network. Drop me a line if you'd like to collaborate on any topic, and have a chance to be featured on our channel.
xIndca 11 months ago
You gotta love the guy's enthusiasm in the video. Wish I could take one of his classes...(although I'd probably have to go back and relearn my times tables first)
BullToTheShit 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Google > ANGEL IN THE AURORA BOREALIS says ONEWHITEDUCK :-)
I THINK SEEING AN ANGEL BEAT THE DEVIL IN A SOLAR STORM HAD AN ODD EFFECT on John Joseph O'Brien says GOD THE FATHER :-)
^
ehehehehe YA THINK SO GOD says John Joseph O'Brien :-)
NIC a TIME
^
GOOGLE > John Joseph O'Brien IS PERFECTLY PARANORMAL says THE HOLY MOTHER :-) :-)
NOW FOR MORE BOTTOMS UP PARANORMAL GHOST FUN with John Joseph O'Brien :-)
DRINK YOUR POISON George Bush says THE HOLY MOTHER OF JESUS :-)
TKTRV 11 months ago
I would like to be a quantum mechanic. Do quantums break down frequently? As I would want to insure that I have enough business to go professional.
DoctorLawyerWhatever 11 months ago
@DoctorLawyerWhatever Spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Photons "break down" when passed through non-linear crystals. Not good for your photons, but handy if you want to conduct delayed choice quantum eraser experiments.
maplebayou1 11 months ago
@maplebayou1 It was a goof, Skeezix. Do lighten up just a tad.
DoctorLawyerWhatever 11 months ago
@DoctorLawyerWhatever I thought I was being light.
maplebayou1 11 months ago
I kept this watch up my ass for three years in that POW camp.
petestrat07 11 months ago 32
@petestrat07 Good man. Did you keep it for an Army buddy's son? I think I know the guy.
geragna 11 months ago
@petestrat07 does look like him
fkngtwat 11 months ago
The only explanation at this point is that light is in fact tangible. End of discussion.
assbitchfucky 1 year ago
What if you make it narrow but you just have no idea what the measurement is? Does it still spread out horizontally? It seems like some other classical thing would explain light spreading out horizontally even has the horizontal slit gets narrower like maybe that's just exactly the amount of room light has in that direction. Because particles like photons aren't suppose to act like waves when your observing them, so I don't see how the properties of a wave could apply to this anyway.
steeveyneon 1 year ago
@steeveyneon Contrary to popular myth, Heisenberg's principle is not about measurement in the sense of a human being obtaining information about the system. It merely requires, in this context, that as the position of a particle is more constrained, its momentum must be less so, and vice versa. It doesn't matter in the least if anyone "knows" the width of the slit. You could hide that part of the apparatus from view and get the same result.
maplebayou1 11 months ago
@steeveyneon As for the particle/wave issue, each photon strikes the screen at one and only one location with a discrete amount of energy. It is in this sense that photons are detected as particles. This does not negate diffraction and other wave phenomena. The color of the light itself is an expression of wave phenomena that we obviously observe.
maplebayou1 11 months ago
What if you make it narrow but you just have no idea what the measurement is? Does it still spread out horizontally? It seems like some other classical thing would explain light spreading out horizontally even has the horizontal slit gets narrower like maybe that's just exactly the amount of room light has in that direction. Because particles like photons aren't suppose to act like waves when your observing them, so I don't see how the properties of a wave could apply anyway.
steeveyneon 1 year ago
Isn't this just the diffraction of light?
ImperialManiac1 1 year ago
If a partials time is determined by the speed in which a partial travels like photons, then does anyone have a theory or answer for this? We observe an object 200 light years away. Time slows down at or near the speed of light, right? Then is the light we see truly 200 years old? Or is the light much younger making the objects we see closer than we believe? Serious question
MrJP2003 1 year ago
Whooo! Walter Lewin! Best Physics teacher ever!
kuzuboshii 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Real BBw wives online now naneedj.info
cheristessa 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheExpandedPicture 1 year ago
It's Christopher Walken!
petestrat07 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Spaghetmonster = Extra dimensions + expanding space + curving space + drawing force + dark matter + dark energy. Do you believe, there is spaghetmonster? i dont believe.
I know, there is only one and same energy and space who is nothing. Some areas energy are more density what outside that areas. This areas where energy are more density, is absorbs energy all a time and thats why it is expanding. All quarks and particle like photons, expanding all a time in space who is nothing! LOVE
Etimespace 1 year ago
Maybe it's simply more photons bouncing of the edge of the slit scattering the beam.
hornetobiker 1 year ago
@hornetobiker If this were the case, we would see a larger spread as soon as the edges of the slit cut off the edges of the beam. The spread would certainly not continue to decrease as the slit narrowed, then "inexplicably" begin to increase dramatically as it reached a fraction of a millimeter.
maplebayou1 1 year ago
@hornetobiker your absolutely right! photon's do only travel one way but so does water,until there"s a disruption in its gravity.in this case the slit scatters the photons and only the available slit transfers the light.this is not even worthy of scientific discussion.
1snkyspy 1 year ago
@hornetobiker remember that light also behaves like a wave, then this phenomenon can be understood in an identical way to the diffraction of sound.
abrelosojo 1 year ago
People who think they understand everything just got owned
interpird350 1 year ago
owned.
interpird350 1 year ago
I have never seen the experiment performed with a curved projection screen so that the distance from the hole to the screen remains the same.
8806196487 1 year ago
I know the diffraction explanation of this phenomena but this is the first time seen it explained with Heisenberg uncertainty. For this to fit uncertainty theory wouldn't you have to be considering the light beam as a single particle?
cnidoblast 1 year ago
@cnidoblast Not the entire beam. Its constituent photons.
maplebayou1 1 year ago
@cnidoblast Well, you're actually asking a question that goes to the core of Quantum Physics. Are they particles or waves? After David Bohm posited the magical "quatum wave", someone posited that everything exists as "wavicles" [I forget who, now]. That's where superpositions and wave functions come into play. It breaks down into really complex math, actually, to answer that question.
cmatrix4761 1 year ago
@cmatrix4761 yeah I'm doing a bit of quantum mechanics for my spectroscopy class and the Schrodinger equation confuses the hell outta me. I saw something when I was heavily sleep deprived after a meth binge a few years ago that really got me thinking about all this. It was a bit of plastic that was flapping like insect wings. It was like my brain couldn't determine its exact position so it existed in a load of different positions simultaneously. Kinda like an electron in an orbital.
cnidoblast 1 year ago
@cnidoblast Maybe admitting to being on a Meth binge isn't the best way to communicate with men and women of science; although, it is online lol.
cmatrix4761 1 year ago
@cmatrix4761 real scientists see things a little more objectively than the rest of the herd thats why I say it as it is when talking to them.
cnidoblast 1 year ago
@cmatrix4761 if quantum entanglement really can be produced in the lab then I think its just a matter of time before its scaled up and we come up with technology utilising the phenomenon. We could create wormholes with this phenomenon because if I walk into a tunnel that is located here and the other end of the tunnel is located on the moon but is connected via entanglement then I could walk through it. We've a bit of a ways to go from subatomic particles though lol.
cnidoblast 1 year ago
@cnidoblast It is a neat phenomenon, but it can't really be used that way. Entanglement still affects local phenomenon, albeit on only one of multiple entangled quantum objects. But, it is a really exciting advancement. Right now, in fact, quantum chips are being researched to vastly increase processor bandwidth and it could, within the next decade, be used to break the lag barrier in long range communications.
cmatrix4761 1 year ago
Now that is very non-intuitive but it's the way the cookie crumbles.
Cesariono 1 year ago
Well it just doesn't make any sense does it? If this experiment proves anything, it's probably the fact that God exists. And that he clearly makes up the rules of physics as he goes along.
camerandpick 1 year ago
@camerandpick That's a wimp's answer to the experiment. Heisenberg was brave in positing that we can't know everything, but just because we don't know it doesn't mean it belongs to a God. Nor does it mean that we can't ever know it -- we've grasped classical physics for less than 400 years, and Quatum physics for less than 100; but, we always master what we set out to understand (well, except God, evidently).
cmatrix4761 1 year ago
@cmatrix4761 I like the argument, it basically puts forward the notion that anything is possible and man is master of all. But I also like the idea of God. I'm not so hot with mathematics so to me, God is the best solution...
camerandpick 1 year ago
@camerandpick That explains the Bible Belt very well.
hankaaron1961 1 year ago
@camerandpick Fair enough -- I believe everyone has the right to believe what they want. But, belief in God as the solution without the effort of seeking out the solution isn't faith - it's blind faith, which is ignorance. We should always try to find or understand the solution; if, upon the effort, finding or comprehending it is still beyond our grasp, only then do we have the right, as rational people, to say "I just don't get it - it must be God". That's my belief, anyway :)
cmatrix4761 1 year ago
@cmatrix4761 i dont see why your comment isnt liked a whole lot its logical but do you believe in God or not?
akahina666 1 year ago
@akahina666 hehe my position hits right at the heart of a really emotional issue for most people; I've found people usually resent those positions when it makes them really think -- thx though :D
And in response to your question -- believe it or not, I'm Taoist. I don't believe or not believe in God; I feel that if there's a God, I'll leave him to his own devices and try to live a life, myself, that I believe is correct. BTW, that's harder than it sounds ;p
cmatrix4761 1 year ago
@cmatrix4761 sounds like comfy way of life. and i respect that. i like tha asian religions, they are so peaceful.
akahina666 1 year ago
@camerandpick Oh one addendum - I didn't posit that Man is master of all; I was merely conveying that we don't know and haven't efforted understanding of everything yet. In other words, I was implying that we should give ourselves some time to understand more before we hide behind our own lack of comprehension.
cmatrix4761 1 year ago
@camerandpick not neccesarily you cannot answer the unkknown by saying god exists and that he is doind this thats obsurd! we still have a lot to learn yet mate! hopefully the hadron collider will shed some LIGHT on this! get it err. ... ok whatever.
mafuuze 1 year ago
why
Shawguy17 1 year ago
Just think of momentum as being the the area that the particle can sweep. In this instance narrowing the gap yields tighter position location, but in turn the area that the particle can sweep because much larger.
hankaaron1961 1 year ago
i still don't get how it relates to the determination of the momentum-position :'(
ashergtk 1 year ago
@ashergtk As the slit constrains the positions of the photons more and more at that point, their momenta are less and less specified. Momentum is a vector, which means it has a direction. Therefore the points at which the photons hit the screen must spread out. Notice that they do not spread out in the vertical direction, only along the axis on which their positions are being constrained at the slit.
maplebayou1 1 year ago
Comment removed
ashergtk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@maplebayou1 from what you've explained i've understood it this way, tell me if i'm wrong: so while you're decreasing the size of the slit, you're determining the momentum more accurately but then the position (on the screen) becomes less accurate?
I've always thought that this was just the wave property of light where it diffracts..
ashergtk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@maplebayou1 from what you've explained i've understood it this way, tell me if i'm wrong: so while you're decreasing the size of the slit, you're determining the momentum more accurately but then the position (on the screen) becomes less accurate?
I've always thought that this was just the wave property of light where it diffracts..
ashergtk 1 year ago
Hurr durr!! Hey look, there's a video above the angry comments section! I wonder if it's more interesting than watching people argue.
mikeroephonics 1 year ago 13
@mikeroephonics
Hi Anon :)
liamciaran 1 year ago
As slit becomes narrower ...the photon's location on the x dimensional plane (considering that lies on the same plane the slits are) gets more and more precise ie to say the uncertainity of the photon's location gets more and more determined.since uncertainity principal states that uncertainity of photon inversely proportionate to uncertainty of momentum.photon's momentum in the x direction becomes more uncertain ie to say a proportion of photons in the beam gets varied hence the spread
kanzie88 1 year ago
One day aliens will come to earth. And they will come to an atheist and say hello we are from a different world. And what if they have a religion or set of beliefs you do not? Will you insult theirs as well as our own even though you risk wars we cannot win?! That is when human beings will meet god, or when everyone, and I do mean everyone asks to see god, and for the first time, HE WILL COME TO US. When he does, please show your respect and bow to him. He's saved us countless times.
AurumenK 1 year ago
@AurumenK So, you believe God of the bible is an alien who... believes in a different god? More lulz for us. Dude, you are retarded, and besides, you just now supported my claim that religion brings wars. No atheist -ever- started a war because they were told god exists. Tell me now, really, you are 12, aren't you? Probably you prayed for an xbox and got it huh? If I were you, I'd thank my parents, not suck my pedo pastor's cock, but to each their own, you probably enjoy it you little faggot.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits ROFL
cmatrix4761 1 year ago
you can say oh yes I believe in nothing and your stupid. Atheism proves nothing and is like a plague of hatred that will never stop you claim to believe in science, well so do I and I am a christian. To all of you atheists, repent, not to a religion but to yourselves for you walk the path of causing wars and ignorance. Just because I believe something you don't, because you didn't get the Xbox you asked god for christmas. Atheists are going to cause more wars in the future ones we won'twin
AurumenK 1 year ago
@AurumenK Uh- actually you got your shit wrong there dude, religion never caused a war because someone argued over it, religion was the one who started the wars by attacking people with different beliefs. Crusades and the like. Back in the dark ages none even THOUGHT of claiming god didn't exist because then? They were burned at the stake, if anything religion has brought death and destruction, look at Hitler, he used Christianity and thats a historical event. You fucktard, that's beyond a game.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@AurumenK Only a fool believes all atheists are hate mongers; just like only a fool believes all people who go to church really believe in loving their neighbors. To spread a message of hate about a particular people in such a sweeping generalization is, well, spreading a message of hate :D
cmatrix4761 1 year ago
i don't understand physics at allllll
daegracious 1 year ago
My brain just got donkey punched.
judomuerte 1 year ago
thats so awesome
bboyloco3 1 year ago
2 minutes well spent methinks :)
rawhemi 1 year ago
by the way when a religious fanatic complains to me that evoloution is just a theory.. i just say going to the moon was just a THEORY and then we DID IT. the same math "in general" is used to theorise evoloution.
THESOULbornold 1 year ago
@THESOULbornold
Evolution is just a theory. But so is Einstein's theory on Gravitation. The one thing I will say about the theory that God exists, is that at the present time, it cannot be proven to be true, nor can it be proven to be false. Only observations that are testable can be subjected to the scientific method. Hence, so-called religious fanatics need to have faith that God exists.
vlatin1 1 year ago
@vlatin1 If God can't be falsified, it's not a theory. You need to differentiate between the colloquial definition and the scientific definition.
RonBurgundy161 1 year ago 17
@RonBurgundy161 Heh -- funny thing about religion and science: most people have no grasp of what science really is, so they have faith in it that it is correct; most people have no idea what God really is, so they have faith in it that it is correct. Science and religion are two sides of the same coin, at least from that perspective.
cmatrix4761 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Spaghetmonster = Extra dimensions + expanding space + curving space + drawing force + dark matter + dark energy. Do you believe, there is spaghetmonster? i dont believe.
I know, there is only one and same energy and space who is nothing. Some areas energy are more density what outside that areas. This areas where energy are more density, is absorbs energy all a time and thats why it is expanding. All quarks and particle like photons, expanding all a time in space who is nothing! LOVE
Etimespace 1 year ago
@vlatin1 Well, technically, the General Theory of Relativity is a misnomer. Einstein wasn't positing that Gravity actually is a warping of spacetime; he was positing that, mathematically, it could be treated that way. To understand this connection, you have to go back and read the full paper he wrote on the Special Theory of Relativity. Anyway, my point is that it wasn't really a theory so much as a mathematical filter. Physicists often make the mistake of proffering one as the other.
cmatrix4761 1 year ago
@THESOULbornold Actually evolution was proven wrong, apparently life cannot come from unlife. If you have two steaks one with no bacteria at all and one with bacteria, and you place the one with no bacteria and put it in a sealed jar no bacteria will grow on that steak proven science. therfore there could not have been primordial ooze, because there wasn't any bacteria to grow and form other things. We did however come from space, apparently there was bacteria on an asteroid that hit the ear
AurumenK 1 year ago
@AurumenK thats not very insightful its a rather narrow view of the whole picture
THESOULbornold 1 year ago
@AurumenK Other than suggesting we are aliens and proving that you are a fagot your comment didn't help much. You talk about a process that takes millions of years. You know how life can come into existence? Well, let me educate you a bit, atoms use the weak force to hold each other together and slowly connect and make 'elements' or what we have on our periodic table. Those in turn can cause chemical reactions with one another and RANDOMLY create life at one point. YES RANDOMLY!
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits Why do you assault me with your words? Don't be angry when someone thinks differently then you I am not attacking you, and I disproved you right there, the atoms were still there in the jar oxygen and the atoms that made up the steak no bacteria came from it. Nothing is random, read up on chaos theory then you can tell me what happened.
AurumenK 1 year ago
@AurumenK Dude, you can show your retardation all you want. But don't mix up the chaos theory, you probably meant the second law of thermodynamics. So, let me end this simply; Earth is an open system mofo. So, with that your closed/open jar shit comes to an end. Chaos theory supports randomness as from small, little changes, big events can take place. That's CT in a nutshell. If you support that I don't see how you can believe in god and not in random abiogenesis on earth.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@AurumenK That's the jar of peanut butter argument. The earth is not a sealed jar. It has been bombarded with space debris for billions of years. That stuff contained all kinds of exotic materials and who knows what kind of chemical processes took place on the early earth. Those conditions do not exist today,so you can't say abiogenesis couldn't have happened based on that it doesn't happen today.
And where did your alien bacteria come from?
HighCardWins 1 year ago
@THESOULbornold Ah but you see, we didn't go to the moon. The landing was filmed underground in a secret lair that the Illuminati rented from the mole people, who were also Freemasons.
Saisinkolimonadin 1 year ago
@Saisinkolimonadin are you crazy man have you been taking any drugs
TheLovesoul1 1 year ago
@TheLovesoul1 Only the LCD that the communists secretly administer into our water supply.
Saisinkolimonadin 1 year ago
@THESOULbornold So because you said that your assumption was correct when you have not witnessed nor seen, you get angry and call them names? Religion only serves to make better people and if it doesn't then it should not be. This is why atheists shouldn't be here. All you do is spread hatred thats why the taliban attacked the us. Don't bother answering this email you will just come up with some insulting comment about how you are right and religion is stupid. at least christians help.
AurumenK 1 year ago
i meant to say whirling
THESOULbornold 1 year ago
this is not that nonintuitive uhm when he closed the slit the light was caught on the edge of it and slung outward by the interferance of the sides closing in on it. the light reacted to the meatal being closed in on it and was slingshot outward maybe gravity but some force interacting with it.a colaberation between the light and the contact of the meatal. it doesnt seem that mysterious to me. whiling the light outward left and right??
THESOULbornold 1 year ago
@THESOULbornold What does gravity have anything to do with light here?
GunsNRosesbitches 1 year ago
I thought that ever since Einstein , nothing is "just a theory" anymore .... First people probably laughed at einstein's theory ... until they saw a mushroom cloud evaporate every damn piece of then meaningless matter within it's radius !!! Also most of modern chemistry, electronics (semiconductors) and computerscience works largely based on quantummechanics
Borat911 1 year ago