It makes sense to me that they put the camera on the Nano before the touch. Because the main market of the Nano seems to be the people who would need a very tiny camcorder at random moments. The iPod touch market is more of a "mobile gaming in your palm, that also has an iPod built in that most people prefer to ignore".
Wrong, they didnt do that so Apple can now get more money with the non-camera Touch, and when they come out with a camera on the next Touch (I'm willing to bet on that) people will ditch their touches and buy the new one cuz it has a camera
I'd be okay with this if the damn Touch actually got a deserved camera too. Irritates me >:C. Still, really nice camera. I might jump for one later on.
That's really good for a phone, not to mention a tiny iPod, much better quality then most cells. But for a digital camera 3 mp is puny, 8 would be the average.
You know next to nothing about cameras and mp I suggest stfu because your just making yourself look stupid.
God are you even listening to yourself, the ipod is NOT 3mp moron, it is 0.3mp note the resolution for video on the apple website, 640x480, and when u multiply that, what does that equal? 307,200 pixels MEANING 0.3MP not even 1MP thats just sad...please get ALL your facts straight when you attempt to sound smart (you know what? Just don't its not going to work). WAY BELOW AVERAGE!! I WOULD LIKE TO SEE HOW YOU WILL COMMENT BACK ON ME!!! SO I CAN LOWER YOUR SELF ESTEEM MORE!
the average mp for a phone is 2mp. 3mp is not "REALLY" good for a phone, 5mp is really good, 8mp is excellent, 12mp is the best, and 3mp is above average. you quote from one of your previous comments means that u think the ipod has 3mp camera, admit it.
that the PC is better than the mac? of course it is dumbass. Why would i hate ipods and love macs? macs suck, theyre overpriced, and dont work. are you fucking mentally challenged?
there is no way the nano has a 0.3 mp camcorder. It would be absolutely awful quality if it did. I think you got it wrong. mega is x10 to the power of six which would mean that this camera having 307,200 p is 3.07 mega pixels...
Well its a yes way on that, are you even thinking about what you are saying. For comaprison purposes lets think about a MEGAbyte, everyone knows a megabyte is roughly 1 MILLION bytes, so 301,200 is rouphly 1/3 of 1million. Go figure...dumbass.
The quality is perfect for what it is, considering. I notice it looks smoother than the Flip, in a good way.
macflyfilm 2 years ago
Okay, well I'm really fucking tired of you spamming my subscriptions page. So I'm out of here. It was fun guys till you went retarded.
duku6 2 years ago
Can you try another at night with indoor lighting??
raven50x 2 years ago
Well, not bad...probably better than a camera-phone
vicodin25mg 2 years ago
the big bang theory house?
ibranchido 2 years ago
Wow, I'm impressed!
forsalebypwner 2 years ago
its nice..
bmd900 2 years ago
It makes sense to me that they put the camera on the Nano before the touch. Because the main market of the Nano seems to be the people who would need a very tiny camcorder at random moments. The iPod touch market is more of a "mobile gaming in your palm, that also has an iPod built in that most people prefer to ignore".
Lockerhaxor 2 years ago
Wrong, they didnt do that so Apple can now get more money with the non-camera Touch, and when they come out with a camera on the next Touch (I'm willing to bet on that) people will ditch their touches and buy the new one cuz it has a camera
Supish16 2 years ago
I'd be okay with this if the damn Touch actually got a deserved camera too. Irritates me >:C. Still, really nice camera. I might jump for one later on.
halodude1177 2 years ago
I ordered my 16GB already. :)
Treskate 2 years ago
I totally thought the camera would fuck (suck) bad but its not bad at all... ,, almost close to iPhone 3G [S].
Mappy4ever 2 years ago
in other words...its average
and another thing, the camera on the 3G and the 3Gs are different, ones 2mpx the other is 3mpx, which is both really average.
Supish16 2 years ago
That's really good for a phone, not to mention a tiny iPod, much better quality then most cells. But for a digital camera 3 mp is puny, 8 would be the average.
You know next to nothing about cameras and mp I suggest stfu because your just making yourself look stupid.
Mrxb0x 2 years ago
God are you even listening to yourself, the ipod is NOT 3mp moron, it is 0.3mp note the resolution for video on the apple website, 640x480, and when u multiply that, what does that equal? 307,200 pixels MEANING 0.3MP not even 1MP thats just sad...please get ALL your facts straight when you attempt to sound smart (you know what? Just don't its not going to work). WAY BELOW AVERAGE!! I WOULD LIKE TO SEE HOW YOU WILL COMMENT BACK ON ME!!! SO I CAN LOWER YOUR SELF ESTEEM MORE!
Supish16 2 years ago
Yes I am listening to myself.... type.
0.3 mega pixels is still good quality for such a small device and that was my main point.
And I did not at any time say the new iPod Nano was 3 Mega pixels, you just pulled that one out of your ass. :)
Maybe if you learn to read properly you can construct an effective retort.
Mrxb0x 2 years ago
"That's really good for a phone, not to mention a tiny iPod" i dont know about you, but I think u just said that 3mp is good for an ipod, who knew =O
Supish16 2 years ago
That is really good for a phone and REALLY good for a tiny iPod. Most cells only have 1mpx
But did I say "iPod Nano has a 3mpx camera on it." ? No. JEEZ YOUR STUPED LOL
Mrxb0x 2 years ago
the average mp for a phone is 2mp. 3mp is not "REALLY" good for a phone, 5mp is really good, 8mp is excellent, 12mp is the best, and 3mp is above average. you quote from one of your previous comments means that u think the ipod has 3mp camera, admit it.
Supish16 2 years ago
lol only purpose built camera/phones have 5mpx and up.
I didn't say iPod has a 3mpx and I never thought it did, I just worded it weird. >_>
Mrxb0x 2 years ago
yeah they are, but they are still out there
and yes its good that u finaly admited that you wored your comment weird
Supish16 2 years ago
Windows is better then mac.
Mrxb0x 2 years ago
lol, what does this have to do with anything?
Supish16 2 years ago
ha ha ha You don't have anything to say to that because you know its obviously irrefutably true.
Mrxb0x 2 years ago
that the PC is better than the mac? of course it is dumbass. Why would i hate ipods and love macs? macs suck, theyre overpriced, and dont work. are you fucking mentally challenged?
Supish16 2 years ago
Oh you hate iPods and mac os?
Your crazy.
iPods are awesome.
Mac sucks ass.
Mrxb0x 2 years ago
sure iPods are so great right? what can an ipod do that most everything else cant do?
Supish16 2 years ago
there is no way the nano has a 0.3 mp camcorder. It would be absolutely awful quality if it did. I think you got it wrong. mega is x10 to the power of six which would mean that this camera having 307,200 p is 3.07 mega pixels...
zXJulianXz 2 years ago
Well its a yes way on that, are you even thinking about what you are saying. For comaprison purposes lets think about a MEGAbyte, everyone knows a megabyte is roughly 1 MILLION bytes, so 301,200 is rouphly 1/3 of 1million. Go figure...dumbass.
Supish16 2 years ago
not bad at all.
AlexGreenberg1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Apple products..for gays & fat chicks
mopore 2 years ago
your probably both.
AlexGreenberg1 2 years ago
Jesus your a bastard aren't you?
halodude1177 2 years ago
not too horribly fucked up
enyownz 2 years ago
UNFAIR. I got a touch just last christmas and now the NANO has a camera.
zakkmiester 2 years ago
okay so the cam is not total shit
IpodTouchAidTeam 2 years ago
not bad..
if only it was on the MOTHERF-ING iPOD TOUCH!
myfriends8008 2 years ago
I KNOW RIGHT
852147369retard 2 years ago