Ridiculously silly. Scientific statistics are out there for all to see. "Global warming" was a corporate business decision to fleece the human being population. Jump started by Maggie Thatcher for her penchant for nuclear reactor investment & the crushing of the coal industry in Britain in the early '70s, the environmental movement was usurped by wealthy globalists to make money & maintain power using a "green" agenda.
Hey! I'm telling you - they don't give a SHIT about YOU or the planet!!
the lord is spot on....you carbon dickheads, there are wars going on people are staving poison water the gov wants every one on pills an you got thing better to do pffffff the world wil be fine, we are the ones being slow killed wake up.......ffs
Cargo cults? Does this idiot even know what a cargo cult is?
And mentioning his eyes? I'd rather be or have had Lord Monckton's life than be some transient, plastic, presenter, not even a journalist, just someone who reads an autocue. Loser
Typical second-rate hit piece; showing steam coming out of smoke stacks (most people think it is pollution) playing over a climate skeptic. One of the shabbiest media tactics
So much for unbiased media, this second rate interviewer is just a green hippie in a suit who also isnt a scientist, at least Lord Monckton has studied it in great detail as well as getting his info from climate scientists who are not financed by government crooks.
97% of scientists agree with the IPCC consensus. No they do not! Science does not progress my consensus; it progresses by falsification and what scientists refer to as 'paradigm shifts'. Historically, claims of consensus have been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Science requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world.
@david52875 Here is a good start. It's a video by Peter Hadfield, a science journalist (yes, a real one!). All his information is brilliantly sourced.
@Iisdabest889 Both are misrepresenting science. YouTube user potholer54 has an entire series called Monckton Bunkum, in which he debunks Monckton's lies. It's well worth a watch.
@Adirtybird When did Monckton offer to debate potholer54? I bet he hasn't. Besides, debating him would be a futile activity as Monckton would peddle a bunch of claims based on misrepresented scientific data, which would be impossible to check during a live debate.
@cmatcmextra Monckton has offered to debate anyone of his youtube detractors anytime he is free to do so. The only ones misrepresenting facts are the funding addicted scientists who have had their snouts in the funding troughs for far to long.
@Adirtybird If you had spoken to a scientist and asked them why they chose that profession, most would tell you that it was because they love learning about the world. Most scientists are not in it for the money and they would certainly not lie just to get more funding.
Lord Monckton can stand there and argue his case, whether you agree with it or not. The other two resort to personal attacks and insinuation. They are a disgrace to their profession. These two people come across to me as incredibly smug and assured of themselves. But then again, they are of the establishment and this sort of insulting behaviour is to be expected. I pity them!!!!
Notice the way this ridiculous lefty journalist waited until the Lord was gone before he hit our at him like a cowardly yapping dog about "not being a scientist". Actually Monckton has published about climate issues in peer-reviewed papers, but to this fool, such irksome details are probably not relevant.
What do you do with a tree, a rope and a journalist? You assemble them.
The Science and Public Policy Institute, of which Monckton is policy director, has published nine non peer-reviewed articles by Monckton on climate-change science. That's it! No Peer-reviewed papers.
@Darthbelal Very strange to see noblesse oblige in action these days, indeed. Refreshing as well. I guess silver spoons and brass balls are not mutually exclusive. And I mean that in a positive way.
@Darthbelal Very strange to see noblesse oblige in action these days, indeed. Refreshing as well. I guess silver spoons and brass balls are not mutually exclusive. And I mean that in an approving way. Lord Monckton has achieved far beyond what privilege alone could account for. The U.S. is greatly in debt to him for helping to stem the tide of AGW hysteria.
I liked how they edited in a montage of factories and cars releasing emissions followed by a natural disaster montage. Fucking propaganda. Montages are not science.
He has NOT published "[peer] reviewed published papers" as a climate scientist. Just let him keep going, at some time the media will wake up to the reality of him, and then (maybe) the politicians. Can you believe that the IPCC ignored his scientific works, the inventor of the cure for MS, influenza, and (partial cure) for AIDS? This proves the IPCC are in a "global communist conspiracy to establish a New World Order"!
.... Monckton asserted: "I am a member of the House of Lords, though without the right to sit or vote, and I have never suggested otherwise."
The official response on Thursday said: "Christopher Monckton is not and has never been a Member of the House of Lords. There is no such thing as a 'non-voting' or 'honorary' member."
The false claims undermine Monckton's credibility in a way that is easy for anyone to understand...
@bernzeppi You are lying!! I have LCM's last published work which includes in it's complete state a list of verified critical apparatus, which were 97 Scientists of renoun. When you look for information, I should hope you would get information from credible sourses, instead of running to front orginazations to get fraudulent information!
Beside all that, for being an "Idiot", He sure puts your camp to running, though, don't he!!!!!!
Because of the atrocious spelling I thought it was a 13 year old "credible sourses, instead of running to front orginazations to get fraudulent information! "
Then I checked... your 34!!!!
You "believe the members of the following are TRAITORS against America...A.C.O.R.N., the A.C.L.U., the Tides Foundation, the C.F.R., any foundations associated with Al Gore.. Global Warming crowd...Nancy Pelosi, ...tough S**T!
@jalsante75 Where was it published? On an internet web site? Wow that makes it count as REAL science. If only people knew, they would not waste 20 years of their life studying science and then trying to get their papers published. Another revelation from the Lord.
@riethc You might like to watch the John Abraham presentation where he rebuts him. Most of the science quoted by Monckton as "proof" actually says the opposite of what he claims! The scientists whose work is referred to were contacted and confirmed that the interpretation offered by Monckton is incorrect. It makes me angry that people believe what M says, he distorts and bends facts and science in the interest of a "good debate" (no argument, he is a great debater!). Debate is not truth!
Bu after the interview, he belittles Monckton and puffs Hansen. Utterly pathetic, cheap tactics that shows what a dick he really is. And shows it to a worldwide audience.
Shallow prick. All that did is to clearly define you as an ignorant, unprofessional failure. So typical of much of the media. When I want your opinion, I'll....... You know what? I don't want your opinion. Just some facts. This is exactly why mainstream media revenues are taking a bath. You are making yourself redundant in a work sense. You are clearly already redundant in every other sense.
So the reporter claims that since Monckton is not a scientist, whatever he says carries no weight. OK, then exactly the same applies to Al Gore and the chairman of the IPCC who is also not a scientist. Ridiculous argument.
You got absolutely rolled pal... Monckton had you swamped... so much so that you have to deride him after the interview... shame... even your dizzy blonde friend ends up inadvertently rolling you... ha!
Ridiculously silly. Scientific statistics are out there for all to see. "Global warming" was a corporate business decision to fleece the human being population. Jump started by Maggie Thatcher for her penchant for nuclear reactor investment & the crushing of the coal industry in Britain in the early '70s, the environmental movement was usurped by wealthy globalists to make money & maintain power using a "green" agenda.
Hey! I'm telling you - they don't give a SHIT about YOU or the planet!!
t4705mb6 1 week ago
the lord is spot on....you carbon dickheads, there are wars going on people are staving poison water the gov wants every one on pills an you got thing better to do pffffff the world wil be fine, we are the ones being slow killed wake up.......ffs
guitatac 6 months ago
@backwardthinker Lol so are you saying science is determined by consensus?
Iisdabest889 7 months ago
That reporter is a tool
chrisz1231 8 months ago
well thats some great neutral reporting isnt it
slimmpiknz 9 months ago
Cargo cults? Does this idiot even know what a cargo cult is?
And mentioning his eyes? I'd rather be or have had Lord Monckton's life than be some transient, plastic, presenter, not even a journalist, just someone who reads an autocue. Loser
disamjisa 10 months ago
Lol, "you need to do this".. typical, shabby, cheap, incompetent
disamjisa 10 months ago
Typical second-rate hit piece; showing steam coming out of smoke stacks (most people think it is pollution) playing over a climate skeptic. One of the shabbiest media tactics
disamjisa 10 months ago
So much for unbiased media, this second rate interviewer is just a green hippie in a suit who also isnt a scientist, at least Lord Monckton has studied it in great detail as well as getting his info from climate scientists who are not financed by government crooks.
no1froggy 10 months ago
97% of scientists agree with the IPCC consensus. No they do not! Science does not progress my consensus; it progresses by falsification and what scientists refer to as 'paradigm shifts'. Historically, claims of consensus have been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Science requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world.
MegaPostman77 11 months ago
Its because NZ is full of tree huggers.
1arryboy 11 months ago
Monckton worried about the working class? the little guy? What a joke. Monckton is a disgusting fraud.
Bridgmanify 1 year ago
@Bridgmanify Please give evidence or go bury your head.
david52875 1 year ago
@david52875 Here is a good start. It's a video by Peter Hadfield, a science journalist (yes, a real one!). All his information is brilliantly sourced.
/watch?v=C3giRaGNTMA
Bridgmanify 1 year ago
"Al Gore should be arrested for profiteering from misrepresenting the science".
Hang on a minute - isn't that what you're doing, Monckton?
cmatcmextra 1 year ago
@cmatcmextra No, because Al Gore was MISREPRESENTING the science, Monckton is not.
Iisdabest889 7 months ago
@Iisdabest889 Both are misrepresenting science. YouTube user potholer54 has an entire series called Monckton Bunkum, in which he debunks Monckton's lies. It's well worth a watch.
cmatcmextra 7 months ago
@cmatcmextra Potholer54 is full of shit and has cowered from monckton's offer to a debate.
Adirtybird 2 months ago
@Adirtybird When did Monckton offer to debate potholer54? I bet he hasn't. Besides, debating him would be a futile activity as Monckton would peddle a bunch of claims based on misrepresented scientific data, which would be impossible to check during a live debate.
cmatcmextra 2 months ago
@cmatcmextra Monckton has offered to debate anyone of his youtube detractors anytime he is free to do so. The only ones misrepresenting facts are the funding addicted scientists who have had their snouts in the funding troughs for far to long.
Adirtybird 2 months ago
@Adirtybird If you had spoken to a scientist and asked them why they chose that profession, most would tell you that it was because they love learning about the world. Most scientists are not in it for the money and they would certainly not lie just to get more funding.
cmatcmextra 2 months ago
When you have no rebuttal, attack a man's eyes. What a loser!
webberjames 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@webberjames ''Lord'' Monckton is a lying scientifically illiterate moron, just watch this -> /watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM
TomValedro 1 year ago
Lord Monckton can stand there and argue his case, whether you agree with it or not. The other two resort to personal attacks and insinuation. They are a disgrace to their profession. These two people come across to me as incredibly smug and assured of themselves. But then again, they are of the establishment and this sort of insulting behaviour is to be expected. I pity them!!!!
MegaPostman77 1 year ago
@backwardthinker You idiot! 97% of climate scientists HAHA, here's a fact: that alarmist statistic came from a poll of 175 scientists!!!
SirTorment 1 year ago
@SirTorment Source please.
cmatcmextra 1 year ago
This guy is so right. Global warming is so much rubbish. what a coward the interviewer is, at least the girl gives balance.
jjtruman 1 year ago
This guy is so right. Global warming is so much rubbish.
jjtruman 1 year ago
Notice the way this ridiculous lefty journalist waited until the Lord was gone before he hit our at him like a cowardly yapping dog about "not being a scientist". Actually Monckton has published about climate issues in peer-reviewed papers, but to this fool, such irksome details are probably not relevant.
What do you do with a tree, a rope and a journalist? You assemble them.
Matthysable 1 year ago
@Matthysable
The Science and Public Policy Institute, of which Monckton is policy director, has published nine non peer-reviewed articles by Monckton on climate-change science. That's it! No Peer-reviewed papers.
Skipster4 10 months ago
@Skipster4 Say's something about peer review, doesn't it.
andyz0007 9 months ago
You know, ironically an English LORD is doing a better job of looking out for and taking care of the little guy than that reporter.
Darthbelal 1 year ago 4
@Darthbelal Very strange to see noblesse oblige in action these days, indeed. Refreshing as well. I guess silver spoons and brass balls are not mutually exclusive. And I mean that in a positive way.
45CaliberCure 1 year ago
@Darthbelal Very strange to see noblesse oblige in action these days, indeed. Refreshing as well. I guess silver spoons and brass balls are not mutually exclusive. And I mean that in an approving way. Lord Monckton has achieved far beyond what privilege alone could account for. The U.S. is greatly in debt to him for helping to stem the tide of AGW hysteria.
45CaliberCure 1 year ago
I liked how they edited in a montage of factories and cars releasing emissions followed by a natural disaster montage. Fucking propaganda. Montages are not science.
douganceK 1 year ago
Bravo Lord Monckton, do not give up, we are with you.
al4484 1 year ago
This reporter is not doing his job his job is to get the facts not debate or take sides that's the problem with the media now days they take sides
chrismcdonald16602 1 year ago
Yet another interview by an ignoramus..
This man will slap back all the political and media garbage
HE TELLS IT LIKE IT IS AND that ticks them all off !!!
StrongArmGuy 1 year ago
this reporter is a joke.
he cant defeat Monckton on any issues while he is on the show, but he likes to talk trash about him after he's gone.
TheHorsenation 1 year ago 3
Thanks for your opinions reporters. lol Good job with your non-reporting, and taking a stab at Monckton's goofy looks.
riethc 1 year ago
@riethc PS search on the net for Abraham, prawn, nazi, monckton and see what the esteemed Lord gets up to with his vicious vitriolic attacks!
indulis1 1 year ago
He has NOT published "[peer] reviewed published papers" as a climate scientist. Just let him keep going, at some time the media will wake up to the reality of him, and then (maybe) the politicians. Can you believe that the IPCC ignored his scientific works, the inventor of the cure for MS, influenza, and (partial cure) for AIDS? This proves the IPCC are in a "global communist conspiracy to establish a New World Order"!
indulis1 1 year ago 2
Neanderthal reporters like this guy should pay an "interviewer tax" that would pay viewers like me, who suffered listening to his stupidity.
wifflecube 1 year ago
2 fucking idiot reporters
Fattboy26 1 year ago
From: sltrib . com/ci_14856887
.... Monckton asserted: "I am a member of the House of Lords, though without the right to sit or vote, and I have never suggested otherwise."
The official response on Thursday said: "Christopher Monckton is not and has never been a Member of the House of Lords. There is no such thing as a 'non-voting' or 'honorary' member."
The false claims undermine Monckton's credibility in a way that is easy for anyone to understand...
Well anyone with a brain
bernzeppi 1 year ago
Monckton's field of expertise is fiction, he is merely practicing it on you
He has NOT published peer reviewed work on climate change.
He should be put on trial... Jones WAS and was cleared!
Monckton says he belongs to Britain's House of Lords- he does NOT
He DOES NOT have a nobel prize:
sltrib . com/ci_14856887
" when you see a complete amateur... you should be highly suspicious."
extras . mnginteractive . com/live/media/site297/2010/0409/20100409_103701_Monckton_Mystery_Solved . pdf
obvious!
bernzeppi 1 year ago
@bernzeppi You are lying!! I have LCM's last published work which includes in it's complete state a list of verified critical apparatus, which were 97 Scientists of renoun. When you look for information, I should hope you would get information from credible sourses, instead of running to front orginazations to get fraudulent information!
Beside all that, for being an "Idiot", He sure puts your camp to running, though, don't he!!!!!!
jalsante75 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jalsante75
Sorry... you are the idiot.
Because of the atrocious spelling I thought it was a 13 year old "credible sourses, instead of running to front orginazations to get fraudulent information! "
Then I checked... your 34!!!!
You "believe the members of the following are TRAITORS against America...A.C.O.R.N., the A.C.L.U., the Tides Foundation, the C.F.R., any foundations associated with Al Gore.. Global Warming crowd...Nancy Pelosi, ...tough S**T!
What a moron!
bernzeppi 1 year ago
@jalsante75 Where was it published? On an internet web site? Wow that makes it count as REAL science. If only people knew, they would not waste 20 years of their life studying science and then trying to get their papers published. Another revelation from the Lord.
indulis1 1 year ago
@indulis1
Monckton cites his sources. I haven't spent much time with his work but if you wanted to check it out you can try to debunk him.
riethc 1 year ago
@riethc You might like to watch the John Abraham presentation where he rebuts him. Most of the science quoted by Monckton as "proof" actually says the opposite of what he claims! The scientists whose work is referred to were contacted and confirmed that the interpretation offered by Monckton is incorrect. It makes me angry that people believe what M says, he distorts and bends facts and science in the interest of a "good debate" (no argument, he is a great debater!). Debate is not truth!
indulis1 1 year ago
I believe you have a typo in your title, it should read:
"Moronic Monckton interviewd by Maligned Reporters"
1BustedMyth 1 year ago
This idiot thinks he knows some shit. hahaha...
Te UK considers global warming a religion! hahaha... That girl just punked that weasel reporter. She has more balls than he does, obviously..
KingDingaLing090 1 year ago
That reporter is an IDIOT!!!!
Monckton can take care of himself though.
grndiesel 2 years ago
This puppet reporter must have ass pain since the puppeteer obviously had a hand right up his ass. lol..
Nice job Monckton!
truefictions 2 years ago
"Have you interviewed James Hansen?"
No answer.
Bu after the interview, he belittles Monckton and puffs Hansen. Utterly pathetic, cheap tactics that shows what a dick he really is. And shows it to a worldwide audience.
jonohx 2 years ago
Shallow prick. All that did is to clearly define you as an ignorant, unprofessional failure. So typical of much of the media. When I want your opinion, I'll....... You know what? I don't want your opinion. Just some facts. This is exactly why mainstream media revenues are taking a bath. You are making yourself redundant in a work sense. You are clearly already redundant in every other sense.
lmtlsss 2 years ago 14
Have you interviewed him? ..."Lord Monckton was correct." Thanks! Moronic to say the least.
purpleprinc3 2 years ago
What a couple of major professional moronic f*ckups!
alkatifa04 2 years ago
So the reporter claims that since Monckton is not a scientist, whatever he says carries no weight. OK, then exactly the same applies to Al Gore and the chairman of the IPCC who is also not a scientist. Ridiculous argument.
oomblikkies 2 years ago 2
those reporters were assholes.
bradthompson86 2 years ago 16
Comment removed
proffishface 2 years ago
You got absolutely rolled pal... Monckton had you swamped... so much so that you have to deride him after the interview... shame... even your dizzy blonde friend ends up inadvertently rolling you... ha!
will3205 2 years ago 3