Climate Projections under a High Emission Scenario

[mrh112]

you have rated my true fact down, well i suppose it shows the knid of people who beleive in this crap, well at least i have hope all of you will have to face up to the truth one day, i mean how long do you think this scam can really go on for, i give it 5 years tops before even the enviro-mentalists! start asking questions

[qsucvatz]

@mrh112 We can't adapt over a lifetime to this level of environmental change - we'll go extinct.

[mrh112]

what about the ice age in the 1800's, yes over half the population died out, wait they didnt they started to skate on the ice!, listen kid there have been THOUSANDS if not MILLIONS of climate changes, every 10,000 years theres an ice age, every 200,000 a global heat wave where the uk turned tropical!, educate yourself and stop listening to scare mongering individuals like the bbc, what happend to the ice age they predicted in the 70's for 2010? they made ALOT of money out of that too

[qsucvatz]

@mrh112 Not much of an ice age, -0.3C? We're looking at +10C; after we have built and settled all the infrastructure which supports agriculture, cities, transportation, etc.

Not possible to move it all, not possible to support everyone. The environment may run away from us, our of our control once methane ice melts, and the Siberian permafrost begins to rot.

[mrh112]

-0.3'c!!! more like -10'c, where are you getting these "scientific" predictions from, you do know the thems froze over 200 years ago right every winter for about 50 years, they even had fairs on it where they used to present shows and it did snow on christmas, sometimes similar to how it snows in canada, you see you just cant accept the fact the climate does change and there is NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT

[qsucvatz]

The best data for the deepest, coldest year of the little ice age is -0.6C, insignificant to humans. 10C is.

[qsucvatz]

@mrh112 There never was any scientific publications which supported a long term ice age in the 70s. Not one - that means if you find one peer reviewed scientific journal published paper, you can make me be completely wrong!

[mrh112]

im my opinion if you invested the money you have into preventing an unpreventable event that will occur naturally anyway you could build defences to defend against the disarster that will come within the next 5 years, in my opinion your just trying to make money out of a small event on the planet, our little time here is a glimpse on the planets day let alone lifeime, adapt and survive its a message i had hammerd into me when i was a child, why is everyone such a wimp now, grow up the lot of you

[qsucvatz]

@mrh112 This is preventable. These are the years when action must be made before it is out of our hands.

[mrh112]

lol, well in 50 years time we will see whos right, which of corse will not be you, by the way only 40% of the population beleive this crap now, you see its like this, imageine theres a hall of 100 people, if 98 of them are sitting quietly down but 2 are jumping and screaming, who are people going to take most notice of?, its the same with this, well i cant be botherd to argue with someone so scientifically enlightend as yourself, i think your g-wizz needs recharging

[qsucvatz]

99%+ of people used to think the world was flat, using your logic, it was flat.

In fifty years time, your children might be paying the high costs of your ignorance and scientific illiteracy.

[qsucvatz]

Unless you let the experts make their best informed and publicly peer reviewed decisions.

Like you do for doctors, civil engineers, computer engineers, and astronomers. Why don't astronomers create a fake asteroid coming to hit us, so they can buy a bunch of great telescopes? Because the evidence isn't there.

The evidence is here for a future of catastrophic climate change unless we take action now. See the IPCC reports, they are enlightening.

[mrh112]

i see so because you seem to think you know the "truth" you see your self beyond us skeptics, hmm, wait a second im just going to look at your age to proove my point, ow youve hid it, i say your just under 25, am i right?, listen kid i know science probably better than you do, everyone one i know knows its not caused by us, lol you do know its "prooven" that water vapour is more of a real threat to earths climate than co2 could ever be, and that a volcaino produces 10 years human co2 in 1 minute

[qsucvatz]

I know the evidence, collected by dozens of Earth observation satellites run by dozens of research organizations. The truth is only approximately approached by the method of science.

We have emitted almost two trillion tonnes of carbon since we began the industrial revolution - raising CO2 levels by 40%.

Your claim about volcanic CO2 is really funny, I like your absurdity.

[qsucvatz]

Up to 40% of the gas emitted by some volcanoes during subaerial eruptions is carbon dioxide.[24] It is estimated that volcanoes release about 130-230 million tonnes (145-255 million tons) of CO2 into the atmosphere each year. This is about a factor of 1000 smaller than the sum of the other natural sources and about factor of about 100 smaller than the sources from human activity.

- wiki carbon dioxide

[1noen1]

Need audio to explain what is going on.