could you please do a full video of running the car without using hho and car using hho to show the difference or at least add a switch to car to show the difference please?
There is alot of energy in even a tiny amount of HHO,even this small addition would make a small improvement in combustion and power output.Youll never run a car on it alone,but the small addition of HHO will certainly give you a few extra miles out of a tank of fuel,the head and exhaust in this video shows that its causing the engine to run hotter with more complete combustion by the whitish deposits and the lack of carbon build up on the pistons/valves etc.
From cold (no warm up) 20amps is 1 litre per minute. When warm 20amps is just over 1.5 litres per minute. 1 litre at 12 amps is 100% efficient, its over 90% efficient... but that really doesnt matter in a car. Even inefficient units make a big difference to an ICE, forget the maths...
We stripped the engine to prove that after 30,000 there were no adverse effects and so we could see how clean it is...
I proved the system viability to myself by driving over 70,000 miles over the last 5 years in various vehicles, always doing the same 500 mile return trip at night when there is no traffic on the motorway.
Why would I answer you? you are so anti-HHO its a joke... I'd rather you came and visited us then we can show you how wrong you are... In fact you are anti lots of things, are you pro anything?
There is a great video and discussion threat for anyone that thinks that HHO systems are beneficial:
watch?v=5G9DAmt_jLk
Well, they're not beneficial. End of day, that little tiny bit of HHO that's produced contains relatively speaking such little amount of energy that it is like throwing a match into a forest fire.
So, yes, HHO *IS* a joke. The facts are crystal clear. You can not win. p.e.r.i.o.d.
I can set off in 5th gear, have lower emissions than a brand new car with a catalyst, at 160,000miles the car is better than new with more mpg and more torque...
hi it is not about the energy content so much as efficient combustion , it burns more fully and cleanly , this is why he showed how clean the engine was internally. Also to prove it is not just energy content.. Cleaning fuel injectors gives better mileage because clean injectors produce a finer mist of fuel ( more like a gas ) than clogged injectors... So you can see that adding an gas like Hydrogen could easily make the combustion more efficient.
thats pretty impressive. im wondering if running hho on a turbo engine (toyota mr2) would help with gains, or would the hho cause pre detination of the fuel
The petrol was from the supermarket 94 ron... the car was designed for a minimum of 98 ron.
The bhp was 117 instead of the standard 112 and the torque was as it should be, 109 lb/ft... but the maximum torque was available for twice as long... nearly full torque at 1500rpm and still there at 4800 which is when the bhp is at maximum...
love the minis
BigAlFiGala 3 weeks ago
Three persons like to spend a lot of money
emercito 1 month ago
Of course its clean, water vapour cleans engine and damage metal surface, due to internal different temperatures.
99XM 2 months ago
@99XM metal surface is only damged by big drops of water not vapour, but condesnsation is the problem.
99XM 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what is the best website to buy performance parts from?
Gregkal123 3 months ago
could you please do a full video of running the car without using hho and car using hho to show the difference or at least add a switch to car to show the difference please?
jawbraeka 4 months ago 2
Runs clean like propane as I`v seen on industrial engines
chuckbear1961 4 months ago
@RKTuneing - and it runs cool despite being lean - even under heavy throttle.
waterboost 5 months ago
I'd like to see a test on a 'non rolling road' to get at the issue of actual efficiency before, during, and then immediately after an H boost.
doktorandom 6 months ago
your an idiot for putting that music on the other video...idiot i tell u
stoShots 1 year ago
HI there.
Can you please tell me how mutch electrolite is your system burns in how manny kilometers or miles?
By the way i had made a 26 plate system and i burn a lot of electrolite 250ml in 200kl.
i Have 40% to 55% fuel reduction in a mazda tribiute 2000cc
and the emissions are just for a joke.
Keep up trhe good work!!!!!
johny12300 1 year ago
you must injekt the ydrogen before the oxizen sensor as the air flows in the engine from the air filter
to get beter results.
johny12300 1 year ago
Comment removed
johny12300 1 year ago
@johny12300 yeh!
waterboost 1 year ago
@johny12300 yeh! get on with it!
waterboost 1 year ago
how did you conect the hho i have the same car but i have no idea how to put the hho
jackodrums 1 year ago
@jackodrums you need a pipe connector on the rubber hose just after the air flow meter
waterboost 1 year ago
There is alot of energy in even a tiny amount of HHO,even this small addition would make a small improvement in combustion and power output.Youll never run a car on it alone,but the small addition of HHO will certainly give you a few extra miles out of a tank of fuel,the head and exhaust in this video shows that its causing the engine to run hotter with more complete combustion by the whitish deposits and the lack of carbon build up on the pistons/valves etc.
silver760 1 year ago
How much current does it typically consume to produce the Hydrogen, and how much is produced, in a given time period?
I'm assuming you did the maths first, to prove the systems viability?
I'm also at a loss as to why you would strip the head off, to show the crowns and valves?
I really don't see what this is supposed to be showing.
Some data, or figures would be very welcome.
martiangrundy 2 years ago
From cold (no warm up) 20amps is 1 litre per minute. When warm 20amps is just over 1.5 litres per minute. 1 litre at 12 amps is 100% efficient, its over 90% efficient... but that really doesnt matter in a car. Even inefficient units make a big difference to an ICE, forget the maths...
We stripped the engine to prove that after 30,000 there were no adverse effects and so we could see how clean it is...
waterboost 2 years ago
I proved the system viability to myself by driving over 70,000 miles over the last 5 years in various vehicles, always doing the same 500 mile return trip at night when there is no traffic on the motorway.
waterboost 2 years ago
How much percentage wise would you say an HHO system improves fuel efficiency?
a1mint 2 years ago
Why would I answer you? you are so anti-HHO its a joke... I'd rather you came and visited us then we can show you how wrong you are... In fact you are anti lots of things, are you pro anything?
waterboost 2 years ago
No one in the entire world has ever been able to prove that an HHO system in a car can be beneficial.
a1mint 2 years ago
I can, but for some reason, people like you dont want to listen to REAL facts and postive results... What do you do?
waterboost 2 years ago
There is a great video and discussion threat for anyone that thinks that HHO systems are beneficial:
watch?v=5G9DAmt_jLk
Well, they're not beneficial. End of day, that little tiny bit of HHO that's produced contains relatively speaking such little amount of energy that it is like throwing a match into a forest fire.
So, yes, HHO *IS* a joke. The facts are crystal clear. You can not win. p.e.r.i.o.d.
a1mint 2 years ago
I can set off in 5th gear, have lower emissions than a brand new car with a catalyst, at 160,000miles the car is better than new with more mpg and more torque...
I have already won, I'm laughing at you!
Who do you work for Shell or Esso?
waterboost 2 years ago
I don't believe you and I think you're lying.
a1mint 2 years ago
Your welcome to come and test drive, visit a dyno and have a full gas analysis (not just an mot sniff test)...
waterboost 2 years ago
You're the UK, I'm in Canada. You know damn well that I'm not going to drop by and test it.
How about you get an installed system tested by someone credible and in a proper scientific manner that a critic can accept.
I've had these fights before with someone, curious how you solve it...
a1mint 2 years ago
hi it is not about the energy content so much as efficient combustion , it burns more fully and cleanly , this is why he showed how clean the engine was internally. Also to prove it is not just energy content.. Cleaning fuel injectors gives better mileage because clean injectors produce a finer mist of fuel ( more like a gas ) than clogged injectors... So you can see that adding an gas like Hydrogen could easily make the combustion more efficient.
timpoiu 2 years ago
thats pretty impressive. im wondering if running hho on a turbo engine (toyota mr2) would help with gains, or would the hho cause pre detination of the fuel
EvilKush1234 2 years ago
HHO is fine in a turbo... it has never caused pre detonated or caused any damage to a turbo before...
waterboost 2 years ago
was there a horsepower and torque gain? what were the number?
EvilKush1234 2 years ago
The petrol was from the supermarket 94 ron... the car was designed for a minimum of 98 ron.
The bhp was 117 instead of the standard 112 and the torque was as it should be, 109 lb/ft... but the maximum torque was available for twice as long... nearly full torque at 1500rpm and still there at 4800 which is when the bhp is at maximum...
waterboost 2 years ago
I get at least 12 calls a day asking what mpg will they get?
the golf has gone from 27-35mpg to 42-64mpg
It didnt even have a working waterpump for the whole 30,000 miles I ran on HHO
Its wicked now... I should go for another dyno run ;)
waterboost 2 years ago
what mileage gains did you get ?
sparten1114 2 years ago