Added: 4 years ago
From: TeamYankee2
Views: 8,873
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ñommy, Ñommy.. I got some fried whale whim, with potatoes and coke. Delicious.

  • yes really research look at the point were the first whale is borded they cant wait to fuking chop it up and RESEARCH the flavour 

  • feeling-less fucking people.

    This is sick and wrong.

    Clearly there is no need to kill thousands of whales for scientific reasons.

  • They are forced to play the "research" game because people like you seem to think you have the right to tell people what they can and can't eat.

  • Your smugness and arrogance will be well rewarded, when one day, the IWC rules that the whale meat cannot in fact be sold, and the "research" program has no economic benefit. Wonder if they would still go whaling then

  • I have no problem whatsoever with the IWC eliminating the "research" clause or even outlawing whaling all together. If and when that happens, unless the IWC engages the S.S. to enforce these new rules/laws, the S.S. will STILL be criminals committing acts of piracy. They have NO authority. No matter how much you believe you're "right" doesn't automatically make your actions "legal" which some people just can't seem to grasp.

  • They (SS) have every authority to enforce these rules, no less than any other world citizen. As under the UN World Charter for Nature 1982 (Clauses 23+24). When governments fail to enforce the laws and regulations set out in said agreement, then it is up to non-governmental groups and the public to act and intervene.

    Research whaling being banned is when, not if. And when this does happen, Sea Shepherd Antartica will be no more. There work down there will be done. :-)

  • I wouldn't be surprised if the "research" loophole were closed and agree that it would be a good thing. However, at present, the S.S. do not have the legal right to do what they're doing per this exclusion and the fact that the U.N. defers to the IWC on issues of whaling. Perhaps if the S.S. didn't have a history of lies, hypocrisy and convicted felonies, they might be albe argue a degree credibility, but thanks to Paul, they've established themselves as a bunch of lawless nuts.

  • "Felonies"?. That's interesting, especially the word "convicted" Because to my knowledge, to date, what have they been charged for that makes them stand out so much more than any other conservation group?. We are all aware of actions they have taken, but what have they actually been charged with?

  • Is there where you're going to try to argue that all these other countries are wrong and the S.S. is right? The Norway and Canadian convictions, the Costa Rica attempted murder warrant and all the countries that yanked S.S. ship registrations?

  • Canada, what was the charge laid against Sea Shepherd?

    Attempted murder of whom by whom?

    Norway didn't lay down any charges, they could never prove any supposed ramming by S.S. The only thing that came from that was Paul Was told he wasn't welcome in Norway.

  • In Canada 2 S.S. officers were convicted of interfering with the seal hunt a law that, as I understand it, was put in place in part due to the previous harassment of the S.S. another other animal rights groups. The attempted murder charge in Costa Rica is for trying to ram a fishing vessel believed to be operating illegally (this claim is a bit questionable). The Norway conviction was an actual conviction, but dates back about 20 years and yes, since then, he's persona non grata.

  • You squid eaters should find some other type of sport, why don't we harpoon som fat Japanese chicks?

  • i love when the blood comes out the spout..wicked cool

  • Idiot.

  • "Japanese Whaling is alleged to breach several international treaties"

    Explain which international treaty Japan breach.

  • Lamer.. IP: 211.126.38.84 try to spam my blog.. lol.. get a grip.

    Oh I forgot.. you're from Japan.. too much whale meat as a school kid. Mercury affecting whatever brain cells you have left... lol

  • "Its the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary declared by the International Whaling Commission" so what? I don't care the AUS gov. sue or not. And win or lose on trial. However, the illegal acts of Sea Shepherd must be judged separately.

  • @chinese5angel Stupid asian. Firstly, how about you learn to speak English correctly, you useless bag of crap. Secondly, how can you possibly condone the inhumane slaughter of such peaceful and majestic creatures? I don't give a damn about your stupid heritage. These animals are in danger of becoming in extinct. You're in Australian/Antarctic Waters (because you've slaughtered everything in your own waters) and so decide to rape our oceans.

  • Perfect Legal Whaling

    Read the ICRW of IWC

    Nothing Aussie Territories in The World

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more