The EF 24-105 L Lens is my most-used landscape lens on a full frame camera. It has great image quality – at least as good as the 24-70, but these two are similar at the same aperture and focal length settings
I also shoot a D7 so not full frame...not sure if that changes your opinion on sharpness...will the 24-70 have better bokeh since its not shooting at full frame then say a 5d?
@AlternativeEnergyNC they're both extrememly sharp. Stop caring about how sharp they are and just shoot. if you actually see them not being sharp then thats a problem, but I doubt anyone actually sees these lenses as being soft. The people that do care way too much about technicalities and not enough about photography. Sure, some lenses ARE soft, but these 2 in particular are far from it. Thanks for watching and keep taking pictures!
I traded my F4 24-105 L for the 24-70 F2.8 Just curious which one is sharper at F4 ? I miss the 24-105 it was very useful...but since I have a 70-200 F2.8 L IS figured it made more sense to have the 24-70 to compliment it. I love primes but do not have the budget for both.
Sorry to break it to you, but the 24-105 has a lot less color fringing and its is more sharp at f4 than the 24-70, It's like that all the way up to f5.6
2.8 is a crummy aperture, mainly because you aren't going to get the same bokeh or sharpness capability as a prime and the f/4 does have IS which allows you to kinda shoot in low light situations as long as your shutter speed doesn't go under 1/25.
Of course there is the sharpness advantage for stopping down the 24-70 over the 24-105 so yay! im confused on what to get again haha
@skatepreme lens without IS is definetly will be hard for cinematography, however you can use stabiliser and the other stuff.....I reccomend you 24-70. because the price selling is really good since many people like it, you can use for photography, and plenty other reason
He's jealous dipmvideos. You don't have to explain yourself to this clown. One's f/4 and the other is an f/2.8, that's why idiot. "Why in the world are even commenting?
Why in the world would you have a 24-70 and a 24-105? What a waste of money. It also shows that you really don't know what you're doing and you're just showing off your toys.
The 24-70 and a 70-200 would serve you much better.
@CabinFeverLures1 firstly, i got the 105 as a kit with the camera more than a year before the 24-70. secondly, we have 2 5dII bodies and my brother uses the other one, he uses the 24-105 more. thirdly, for film, the IS helps, and the 24-70 ' have it. go to my flickr for my photos, the link is on my channel. i have more reasons, let me know if you wanna hear them.
I need your help here, I bought the 7D (body only) and I'm looking for to buy my first my first L. I will be using to take pics of the kids indoors and out, so for the 7D should I go for the 24-105 or the 24-70mm?
so it wont affect that much if i use this for nightclub right? ( i know the 2.8 is much a better choice but i use a flash most of the time so it doesnt matter) and finally its a great lens for everything and i know theres always a better choice of lens specialiste in any photography but i cant afford every lens for each scenario =)
@dpimvideos hey i got an old vivitar lens thats 135 prime f/2.8 for the film camera i have...but any way i was just wondering is that good in todays standards.
Excellent comparison there man. However I just bought the 24-70 because I always shoot at low light plus I also bought the 70-200 so i dont really care about the zoom part.
Good overview, do you have any photo's of the same subject, one shot at F4 and one at F2.8. Just to see the difference between the two. Say at 50 MM, ISO 400. @dipmvideos
Hey bro, just discovered the channel, love it. Question though, If I'm using off camera flash in modeling work, would you recommend the 24-105, its gonna be my first big purchase and I figured I would get more use out of that then some of the other choices.
LOL... 70-200 2.8.. is best for journalists.. and portraits.... IF! you want versatile lens.. I'd go for the 24-105... those people who says "Why have that lens when you can have the 70-200 F2.8" is ambitious.... or don't know what you're talking about... the reason I would choose 24-70 and 24-105 like he said "Depends what you shoot"!!! 70 normal focal zoom.. is annoying imo
I know you're right.. getting criticized by these noobs.. are just jealous you have those lens... I have the 24-70L and I love it... this people don't know jack... and hatin'... keep going bro!
Everything is working fine, but the sensor is not doing his job anymore.
When i shot a pic, only a black picture is shown on my screen. Before I didnt use my 7d for a couple of weeks. The older pics that are still saved on my memory card are shown on the display without any problems. The finder are doing good as well as the autofocus.
When i try to make a film, the result is also just black. The cap of my lenses are of course taken off
@theycallmeavijeet: lol... It wouldn't matter if he shoots hands on.. it's a video review... and it won't make any differents, the lens don't shoot beams btw.. so... to propperly review a lens is it's image quality through raw image demonstraition... you can't tell an image quality through youtube!!!.... peace!
@dipmvideos Im not saying prime lense is not good...but if u are comparing 24-70mm f/2.8 against 24-105mm f/4...i would definitely go with 24-70mm coz maximum aperture opening to me is must more important especially if i am shooting in low light condition...and that`s also the reason why prime lenses are better because of their constant aperture which are...f/1.8,f/1.4 and f/1.2....not f/4 buddy...:P
so the only advantage is that the 24-70 is a better lens!?! also why do you have bothe? what the fuck are you doing with the 24-107 when you could have a 70-200 2.8 for the same price. i just dont understand why you own bothe!?! have you got any photos as a comparrison or a website?
@dipmvideos but why bother keeping it when you could sell it and get a better lens!?!? get a 70-200 2.8 and then you will have the whole range of pro lenses! the 2.8 canons are the best zooms you can get for canon so why have second best when you could easily have better!
@kneeny1 i've been considering doing that for a while now. might actually go it soon to fund a 85 1.2 or like you said, a 70-200. i've been using it a lot lately though, so i'm not sure yet.
@dipmvideos do you use a full frame or a cropped frame camera because the 85mm will be somthing like 115mm. the 85 is considered the best portrait lens, i have never used one but i have seen comparrison shots and its insane, but i have to say that as you said in this video the sharpest shots are not when the apperture is wide open and youl be shooting around 2 or 2.2 for portraits anyway. i use the 70-200 for weddings and i have to say its the one i use the most just because you can use it loads
@kneeny1 full frame. and im planning to shoot at 1.2 a lot. if not, why even get the 1.2? sure it might be "sharper" at lower apertures, but thats not really what i care for. when shooting at 1.2, its not sharpness you're looking for.
After days of research I am finally free! I really wanted to go for the 17 I was so upset that it didn't have IS but it's not a deal breaker like you said. You just saved me hundreds of dollars.
@dipmvideos well in photography $5,000-$10,000 inst that much either. Adding lenses, strobes, power pack rangers, computers, accessories. add $10,000 if u got one 1ds and a second body like 5D; add few more if you hire assistant.
I was talking about a normal person, The hobbyist. Since pro can get his money back but hobbyist can't so for him $200 = one 50mm 1.8 II few other small things.
@hdjkasdhah its all good. believe me, i dont have that much money. i just put a lot of value in this stuff so i have to work hard to save a little bit more, and sacrifice other things in order to get some of this stuff. thanks for watching!
Hay Bailey, leave the kid alone dude...at least he tried to explain what he knew...If u r too smart, why don't u review them. If u r a good photographer u should know to appreciate other people's work..this is a great video, I made-up my mind to buy f4 lens thanks to this video...
@dipmvideos Your just babbling dude! No real help at all really apart from the obvious. You have explained nothing about weight or physical sizes of these lenses, focusing distance/speed either! Also you are comparing both of these lenses extremely wrong! I certainly wouldn't part with my cash after watching this video
@HEREONOUTBAILEY mkay. sorry it didnt help you, but i'm sure it helped others. really, does the focusing distance matter to most? i talked about what i thought was important in the lenses.
@dipmvideos No worries man! Yes, those other things I mentioned are very important when investing in any L series lens! Luckily I own both of the lenses you are comparing, not sure if you are aware of the poor quality control (rumor) on the 2.8 but I would choose the f.4 any day as it's the sharpest lens I own & of how versatile it can be in regards to focal length! It is fully capable of capturing great portraits at f.4 at 105, great DOF with a FF sensor :)
@DudeFromUkraine video is a lot more forgiving because of the lower resolution compared to a still photo, so a cheaper lens would be able to do the job as well! i dont have any suggestions, but go out and try some lenses!
We had 2 bad copies of the 24-105mm, it was really disappointing. The 3d one was luckily great. Though, the 24-70mm has been working like a charm for a long time. Great comparison! Finally someone who knows what he's talking about, and doesn't just yap about the basic information that are available from the company itself.
haha at this focal length I don't get shaky hands...So which focal length causes you to get shaky hands? at 105mm I think even a little shake would be pretty visible but I still find it funny that you said at this focal length I don't get shaky hands
@rahkshi007 The 24-105 will give you a better Bokah (background blur) in comparison to the the 24-70, providing you have good light. However, if you are looking to receive a high quality blur in low light, the 24-70 is the way to go.
@Mexico911 S, you can hand hold less preferable slower shutter speeds to recieve 2 stops extra exposure without a blurry photo compared to non-IS lenses.
@Mexico911 Dont underestimate the capabilities of Image Stabilisation. There is a reason why on lenses such as the 70-200 2.8 IS in which the price is an extra 1k.
@FlyinangeLproduction any lens would do. depends on the look you want. a "music video" isn't specific at all. i cant really recommend a lens based on just that. if you're asking if the 24-70 is a good lens for video, then yes.
I was unsure about what of both lens buy. Finally, I decided for the 24-70 mm f2.8 and I'm very happy with it. It's a very versatile lens that covers a lot of common situations, landscapes, portraits, typical tourism photos, and low light conditions, for example museums where no flash is allowed or evening shots. The construction quality is exceptional and it is very very sharp. Taking in account both things the focus distance and aperture I think this is more versatile lens than the 24-105mm
I was unsure about what of both lens buy. Finally, I decided for the 24-70 mm f2.8 and I'm very happy with it. It's a very versatile lens that covers a lot of common situations, landscapes, portraits, typical tourism photos, and low light conditions, for example museums where no flash is allowed or evening shots. The construction quality is exceptional and it is very very sharp. Taking in account both things the focus distance and aperture I think this is more versatile lens than the 24-105mm
sillentkller9, just shut the fuck up already. nobody cares about what you have to say here. move your ass along as the majority here doesn't give a fuck what you say. you fucking first living abortion.
That being said, great review dipmvideos!! Keep up the superb work!
@sillentkller9 alright, show me your stuff. i'll be the judge of that. its obvious since you have so much time to troll that you're no where near profesional.
Hi buddy, I'm using 5d Mii taking events videos eg Weddings and Parties. What is the comparison between 17-40mm f4 & 16-35mm f2.8?
fireblade1247 3 weeks ago
can i use the 24-70 for the canon t2i
greenlatraya 3 weeks ago
so young to own expensive gear
GanEdenVideo 1 month ago
@GanEdenVideo are you pretty much saying that just because we're young shouldn't mean we can afford all of this?
BrandonKingVloggin 1 month ago
what lense are u using now in this video
ASE504 1 month ago
Hello can you compare the 5d vs 7d many thanks
MYK989 1 month ago
The EF 24-105 L Lens is my most-used landscape lens on a full frame camera. It has great image quality – at least as good as the 24-70, but these two are similar at the same aperture and focal length settings
mignonette2trois 1 month ago
I also shoot a D7 so not full frame...not sure if that changes your opinion on sharpness...will the 24-70 have better bokeh since its not shooting at full frame then say a 5d?
AlternativeEnergyNC 2 months ago
@AlternativeEnergyNC they're both extrememly sharp. Stop caring about how sharp they are and just shoot. if you actually see them not being sharp then thats a problem, but I doubt anyone actually sees these lenses as being soft. The people that do care way too much about technicalities and not enough about photography. Sure, some lenses ARE soft, but these 2 in particular are far from it. Thanks for watching and keep taking pictures!
dipmvideos 2 months ago
I traded my F4 24-105 L for the 24-70 F2.8 Just curious which one is sharper at F4 ? I miss the 24-105 it was very useful...but since I have a 70-200 F2.8 L IS figured it made more sense to have the 24-70 to compliment it. I love primes but do not have the budget for both.
AlternativeEnergyNC 2 months ago
Comment removed
AlternativeEnergyNC 2 months ago
Comment removed
AlternativeEnergyNC 2 months ago
what lens are you shooting this video with?
brandonallenfigueroa 2 months ago
@brandonallenfigueroa 17-40 f/4 L
dipmvideos 2 months ago
@dipmvideos cool! thanks. what do you think is better? the 16-35 f2.8L or the one you're using the 17-40?
brandonallenfigueroa 2 months ago
@brandonallenfigueroa The 16-35 is probably better but I've never used it so I can't say for sure.
dipmvideos 2 months ago
24-105 f/4 because of the IS. A must for shooting video.
saralsth 2 months ago
Sorry to break it to you, but the 24-105 has a lot less color fringing and its is more sharp at f4 than the 24-70, It's like that all the way up to f5.6
MisterZech 2 months ago
@MisterZech I have both, and thats not what i've seen. maybe i have a bad 24-105. whatever the case is, I'm just sharing what i've experienced.
dipmvideos 2 months ago
@MisterZech Thank you, I almost lost it when Niko said that nonsense about the 24-70 being sharper than the 24-105.
THE 24-105 IS SHARPER!
CEEPMDEE 1 month ago
@CEEPMDEE the 24-105 ist definitely sharper! You're right, I also tought the same like u!
XxxxxSpecterxxxxX 1 month ago
thank you for this explains. I was searching for the difference between this two lenses.
CocktaiLMolotovX 2 months ago
My 2 cents:
2.8 is a crummy aperture, mainly because you aren't going to get the same bokeh or sharpness capability as a prime and the f/4 does have IS which allows you to kinda shoot in low light situations as long as your shutter speed doesn't go under 1/25.
Of course there is the sharpness advantage for stopping down the 24-70 over the 24-105 so yay! im confused on what to get again haha
JAFrk 2 months ago
Did you buy the 24-105 just to make this video? LOL
M1sterHamilton 2 months ago
@M1sterHamilton bought the 105 more than a year before the 24-70 buddy.
dipmvideos 2 months ago
is the 24-105mm good for wedding photography?
XxSuddenlyPsychotic 2 months ago
@XxSuddenlyPsychotic it could be. depends what body you're using, what lighting conditions there are, and your skill of course.
dipmvideos 2 months ago
@XxSuddenlyPsychotic yes...and better for porn photography
sixameleon 2 months ago
Holy sh*t you are good!
Ariscelia 2 months ago
Which one would be best for cinematogrpahy?
skatepreme 2 months ago
@skatepreme the 24-70 gives you the option for shallower depth of field, but IS comes in handy too. depends on what you value more.
dipmvideos 2 months ago
@dipmvideos If I used primes for my DOF shots and I just need a zoom lens. Would the 24-105 be my best choice?
skatepreme 2 months ago
@skatepreme yup
dipmvideos 2 months ago
@skatepreme lens without IS is definetly will be hard for cinematography, however you can use stabiliser and the other stuff.....I reccomend you 24-70. because the price selling is really good since many people like it, you can use for photography, and plenty other reason
Babanghans 2 months ago
Comment removed
skatepreme 2 months ago
thank you! you've been a big help. you definitely know what you're talking about
chidhergruen 2 months ago
For BEST video quality what lens would any of you advise?
MikeGrayFilms 2 months ago
He's jealous dipmvideos. You don't have to explain yourself to this clown. One's f/4 and the other is an f/2.8, that's why idiot. "Why in the world are even commenting?
Don't watch the video you jealous MF.
rangersyankees1 3 months ago
Why in the world would you have a 24-70 and a 24-105? What a waste of money. It also shows that you really don't know what you're doing and you're just showing off your toys.
The 24-70 and a 70-200 would serve you much better.
CabinFeverLures1 3 months ago
@CabinFeverLures1 i actually take photos bud, i think i know what i'm doing.
dipmvideos 3 months ago
@dipmvideos I haven't seen any. All I've seen is you bragging about crap your daddy probably bought you.
So if you've got a real reasons to have two nearly identical lenses that completely overlap focal length, please, inform me.
CabinFeverLures1 3 months ago
@CabinFeverLures1 firstly, i got the 105 as a kit with the camera more than a year before the 24-70. secondly, we have 2 5dII bodies and my brother uses the other one, he uses the 24-105 more. thirdly, for film, the IS helps, and the 24-70 ' have it. go to my flickr for my photos, the link is on my channel. i have more reasons, let me know if you wanna hear them.
dipmvideos 3 months ago
Wow, so what kind of job do you have to buy these L lenses?
bthemedia 3 months ago
Could I use 24-105 to take photos of sport (basketball) from the sideline? It is good for that? Would you recommend me an other? Thx :)
heilige94 3 months ago
Comment removed
RAAR3040 3 months ago
Responder a este vídeo... Get the canon 70-200 f2.8, that will come perfect for basketball, PERFECT, and if you want you can buy the IS version
RAAR3040 3 months ago
@RAAR3040 Thank you very much :)
heilige94 3 months ago
I need your help here, I bought the 7D (body only) and I'm looking for to buy my first my first L. I will be using to take pics of the kids indoors and out, so for the 7D should I go for the 24-105 or the 24-70mm?
I have the 50mm 1.4.
Thank you in advance for your help.
rangersyankees1 3 months ago
do you have a website with your pictures on it?
extreemeairsoft 3 months ago
you should practice before you video it....
CHENMERVIN 4 months ago
aah .. i like my 28-300mm sigma :p
FKlanberg 4 months ago
Now - why can't we get a 24-105mm at F/2.8 :P
u03agc4 4 months ago
@u03agc4 haha yeah! but that would be one huge lens :P
dipmvideos 4 months ago
hey dude,
is the sharpness of the 24-70 that big of a difference over the 24-105 ??
AJBuenviaje 4 months ago
@AJBuenviaje not really, especially at smaller apertures
dipmvideos 4 months ago
@dipmvideos
ohh okk. thanks!
so it wont affect that much if i use this for nightclub right? ( i know the 2.8 is much a better choice but i use a flash most of the time so it doesnt matter) and finally its a great lens for everything and i know theres always a better choice of lens specialiste in any photography but i cant afford every lens for each scenario =)
great reviews pare! keep it up ;)
AJBuenviaje 4 months ago
@dpimvideos hey i got an old vivitar lens thats 135 prime f/2.8 for the film camera i have...but any way i was just wondering is that good in todays standards.
douglasman100 4 months ago
So basically, is it worth saving up the extra month for the 24-70?
what2doandhow2doit 4 months ago
@what2doandhow2doit do you need the will you be using it at 2.8? if so, yes.
dipmvideos 4 months ago
@dipmvideos thank you for responding. i will probably end up saving up for the 24-70 for film. thank you!
what2doandhow2doit 4 months ago
Excellent comparison there man. However I just bought the 24-70 because I always shoot at low light plus I also bought the 70-200 so i dont really care about the zoom part.
lswebsitedesign 5 months ago
nice
JetPakStudios 5 months ago
Good overview, do you have any photo's of the same subject, one shot at F4 and one at F2.8. Just to see the difference between the two. Say at 50 MM, ISO 400. @dipmvideos
productfeedback 5 months ago
haha great ending :D
Kamisq 5 months ago
@IWANTNOMZ it is sharper but to most, the difference doesn't matter at all.
dipmvideos 5 months ago
Can both of these lenses be used on the 7D? For someone starting out, is it worth while spending the extra money and 5DMkII over the 7D?
serpentcharmer2006 5 months ago
@serpentcharmer2006 yes they can. what are you looking for in a camera? get the one with the features that you want
dipmvideos 5 months ago
Hey just wondering, does the 24-70 lens hood fit onto the 24-105 lens? I like the lens hood for the 70.
HoyFilipinoBoy 5 months ago
@HoyFilipinoBoy nope, sorry. i mean any lend hood that has a 77mm thread will fit but they cause vignetting on lenses that they're not for.
dipmvideos 5 months ago
@dipmvideos okay thank you for replying :) loved the review.
HoyFilipinoBoy 5 months ago
@HoyFilipinoBoy no problem, and thanks
dipmvideos 5 months ago
Hey bro, just discovered the channel, love it. Question though, If I'm using off camera flash in modeling work, would you recommend the 24-105, its gonna be my first big purchase and I figured I would get more use out of that then some of the other choices.
ThePaisteTrout477 6 months ago
@ThePaisteTrout477 when you use lights, you shoot at higher f stops, so really, most lenses would do fine. the 24-105 would be perfect.
dipmvideos 6 months ago
where have you got that expensive equipment??
nIcecreamovie 6 months ago
LOL... 70-200 2.8.. is best for journalists.. and portraits.... IF! you want versatile lens.. I'd go for the 24-105... those people who says "Why have that lens when you can have the 70-200 F2.8" is ambitious.... or don't know what you're talking about... the reason I would choose 24-70 and 24-105 like he said "Depends what you shoot"!!! 70 normal focal zoom.. is annoying imo
jl644 6 months ago
I know you're right.. getting criticized by these noobs.. are just jealous you have those lens... I have the 24-70L and I love it... this people don't know jack... and hatin'... keep going bro!
jl644 6 months ago
@123gilly321 what do you mean? would you have know what I thought about the lenses before watching the video?
dipmvideos 6 months ago
hey. i just have to ask. are you filipino?
BIANCAohBIANCA 6 months ago
@BIANCAohBIANCA yup!
dipmvideos 6 months ago
Hello dipmvideos
I got a serious problem with my canon 7d.
Everything is working fine, but the sensor is not doing his job anymore.
When i shot a pic, only a black picture is shown on my screen. Before I didnt use my 7d for a couple of weeks. The older pics that are still saved on my memory card are shown on the display without any problems. The finder are doing good as well as the autofocus.
When i try to make a film, the result is also just black. The cap of my lenses are of course taken off
ArtJorgeCom 6 months ago
@ArtJorgeCom i think thats a big problem! seek help from a professional..on canon service centers
althegreat17 6 months ago
@ArtJorgeCom Your sensor could be defective... you need to send it back or get it replace from where you bought it....
jl644 6 months ago
spoiled bitch
reptilewars 6 months ago
you should do a review, hands-on. Like actually shooting with it and stuff. would be a lot more helpful, Please try too.
theycallmeavijeet 6 months ago
@theycallmeavijeet: lol... It wouldn't matter if he shoots hands on.. it's a video review... and it won't make any differents, the lens don't shoot beams btw.. so... to propperly review a lens is it's image quality through raw image demonstraition... you can't tell an image quality through youtube!!!.... peace!
jl644 6 months ago
Лошара))))))))))))
dendolgov 6 months ago
there are only two best lenses...24-70mm f/2.8 and 70-200mm f/2.8 (IS or non IS version ) ..period .
paintusingthelight 7 months ago
@paintusingthelight haha i guess you've never used any of canons L primes then :P
dipmvideos 7 months ago
@dipmvideos Im not saying prime lense is not good...but if u are comparing 24-70mm f/2.8 against 24-105mm f/4...i would definitely go with 24-70mm coz maximum aperture opening to me is must more important especially if i am shooting in low light condition...and that`s also the reason why prime lenses are better because of their constant aperture which are...f/1.8,f/1.4 and f/1.2....not f/4 buddy...:P
paintusingthelight 7 months ago
@paintusingthelight whatevs, you said "there are only two best lenses...24-70mm f/2.8 and 70-200mm f/2.8 (IS or non IS version ) ..period"
dipmvideos 7 months ago
are you a filipino?
marcmarleyrian 7 months ago
@marcmarleyrian yup
dipmvideos 7 months ago 4
@dipmvideos ok yung mga videos mo! thumbs up for Filipino photographers!
marcmarleyrian 7 months ago 3
so the only advantage is that the 24-70 is a better lens!?! also why do you have bothe? what the fuck are you doing with the 24-107 when you could have a 70-200 2.8 for the same price. i just dont understand why you own bothe!?! have you got any photos as a comparrison or a website?
kneeny1 7 months ago
@kneeny1 i got the 24-105 way before the 24-70. they both have their uses. i'll do what i want, thanks.
dipmvideos 7 months ago
@dipmvideos but why bother keeping it when you could sell it and get a better lens!?!? get a 70-200 2.8 and then you will have the whole range of pro lenses! the 2.8 canons are the best zooms you can get for canon so why have second best when you could easily have better!
kneeny1 7 months ago
@kneeny1 i've been considering doing that for a while now. might actually go it soon to fund a 85 1.2 or like you said, a 70-200. i've been using it a lot lately though, so i'm not sure yet.
dipmvideos 7 months ago
@dipmvideos do you use a full frame or a cropped frame camera because the 85mm will be somthing like 115mm. the 85 is considered the best portrait lens, i have never used one but i have seen comparrison shots and its insane, but i have to say that as you said in this video the sharpest shots are not when the apperture is wide open and youl be shooting around 2 or 2.2 for portraits anyway. i use the 70-200 for weddings and i have to say its the one i use the most just because you can use it loads
kneeny1 7 months ago
@kneeny1 full frame. and im planning to shoot at 1.2 a lot. if not, why even get the 1.2? sure it might be "sharper" at lower apertures, but thats not really what i care for. when shooting at 1.2, its not sharpness you're looking for.
dipmvideos 7 months ago
Love your T-shirt:)
erik88bmx 7 months ago
@erik88bmx haha, thanks!
dipmvideos 7 months ago
After days of research I am finally free! I really wanted to go for the 17 I was so upset that it didn't have IS but it's not a deal breaker like you said. You just saved me hundreds of dollars.
Quadigy 7 months ago
@Quadigy glad i was able to help!
dipmvideos 7 months ago
same price range with just over $200 difference; interesting. Some kids are just retardtidly rich :/
hdjkasdhah 7 months ago
@hdjkasdhah i'm 20... and in terms of photography gear, 200$ isnt too much, especially in this case. adding the extra can get you so much more.
dipmvideos 7 months ago
@dipmvideos well in photography $5,000-$10,000 inst that much either. Adding lenses, strobes, power pack rangers, computers, accessories. add $10,000 if u got one 1ds and a second body like 5D; add few more if you hire assistant.
I was talking about a normal person, The hobbyist. Since pro can get his money back but hobbyist can't so for him $200 = one 50mm 1.8 II few other small things.
And I mean no offence bro, cheers :)
hdjkasdhah 7 months ago
@hdjkasdhah its all good. believe me, i dont have that much money. i just put a lot of value in this stuff so i have to work hard to save a little bit more, and sacrifice other things in order to get some of this stuff. thanks for watching!
dipmvideos 7 months ago
good work kid. keep it up.
walismo 8 months ago
Are you stupid ? We already know those shit , you should talk about sharpness... -_-
BlackWallProduction 8 months ago
@BlackWallProduction He did mention sharpness, you ignorant bastard.
Solarfactor 7 months ago
Hay Bailey, leave the kid alone dude...at least he tried to explain what he knew...If u r too smart, why don't u review them. If u r a good photographer u should know to appreciate other people's work..this is a great video, I made-up my mind to buy f4 lens thanks to this video...
chirantha 8 months ago
so, the for night time shooting and indoor shotting 24-70 2.8 is better over the other one?
cfhasib 8 months ago
@cfhasib yup!
dipmvideos 8 months ago
BORED.
HEREONOUTBAILEY 8 months ago
@HEREONOUTBAILEY mkay.
dipmvideos 8 months ago
@dipmvideos Your just babbling dude! No real help at all really apart from the obvious. You have explained nothing about weight or physical sizes of these lenses, focusing distance/speed either! Also you are comparing both of these lenses extremely wrong! I certainly wouldn't part with my cash after watching this video
HEREONOUTBAILEY 8 months ago
@HEREONOUTBAILEY mkay. sorry it didnt help you, but i'm sure it helped others. really, does the focusing distance matter to most? i talked about what i thought was important in the lenses.
dipmvideos 8 months ago
@dipmvideos No worries man! Yes, those other things I mentioned are very important when investing in any L series lens! Luckily I own both of the lenses you are comparing, not sure if you are aware of the poor quality control (rumor) on the 2.8 but I would choose the f.4 any day as it's the sharpest lens I own & of how versatile it can be in regards to focal length! It is fully capable of capturing great portraits at f.4 at 105, great DOF with a FF sensor :)
HEREONOUTBAILEY 8 months ago
@HEREONOUTBAILEY i have, and i was really happy to find that mine was a good copy! i also agree that the 105 does an amazing job on the 5d!
dipmvideos 8 months ago
@dipmvideos Do you have a Flickr account so I can check out your work?
HEREONOUTBAILEY 8 months ago
@HEREONOUTBAILEY yup, link is on the channel! some of my newer work isnt too good though.
dipmvideos 8 months ago
@dipmvideos You have some really nice work! Beautiful portraits :)
HEREONOUTBAILEY 8 months ago
@HEREONOUTBAILEY thanks! :D
dipmvideos 8 months ago
you don't know nothing about lenses, you don't know what you saying
Dodik700 8 months ago
@Dodik700 so what do i "not know"?
dipmvideos 8 months ago
so jealous of US prices... so much more expensive in the UK :/
jledarby 9 months ago
Nice job, what about for video? Is the 24-105 pretty good?
DudeFromUkraine 9 months ago
@DudeFromUkraine yup, its good!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
@dipmvideos Worth every penny? Other cheaper option? Thanks!
DudeFromUkraine 9 months ago
@DudeFromUkraine video is a lot more forgiving because of the lower resolution compared to a still photo, so a cheaper lens would be able to do the job as well! i dont have any suggestions, but go out and try some lenses!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
@dipmvideos Thanks man!
DudeFromUkraine 9 months ago
@DudeFromUkraine anytime!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
Nice job
DudeFromUkraine 9 months ago
Comment removed
mariansin 9 months ago
@mariansin i think i speak just fine.
dipmvideos 9 months ago
We had 2 bad copies of the 24-105mm, it was really disappointing. The 3d one was luckily great. Though, the 24-70mm has been working like a charm for a long time. Great comparison! Finally someone who knows what he's talking about, and doesn't just yap about the basic information that are available from the company itself.
TheDigitalPhotograph 9 months ago
@TheDigitalPhotograph thanks so much! i'm happy i got good copies of both the lenses! hope the lenses are treating you well!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
Good Comparison
dashti442 9 months ago
@dashti442 thanks!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
does the 24-70mm 2.8 has Full Time Manual Focus???
xIIIxViperxIIIx 9 months ago
@xIIIxViperxIIIx yup!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
what about image stabilization in video? does the 24-70 show a lot of shake?
al3xgilb3rt 9 months ago
where did you find it for 1300?
i can only find it for 1500
GarettIsHere 9 months ago
haha at this focal length I don't get shaky hands...So which focal length causes you to get shaky hands? at 105mm I think even a little shake would be pretty visible but I still find it funny that you said at this focal length I don't get shaky hands
FilmCritic5422 9 months ago
hi .. i want to as which lens will blur the background more ?if the 24-70mm is shoot at 70mm f2.8 and the 24-105mm is shoot at 105mm f4 ?
rahkshi007 9 months ago
@rahkshi007 The 24-105 will give you a better Bokah (background blur) in comparison to the the 24-70, providing you have good light. However, if you are looking to receive a high quality blur in low light, the 24-70 is the way to go.
macabrechrist 9 months ago
Comment removed
tinflick 9 months ago
thankkkkk you that was very very helpful! :)
JuNCurryAhn 9 months ago
Ah... by the way what camera did you use for that, I mean the video. Cause if it is a 550d from Canon I have the same and i can't do it...
TiToooTiT 9 months ago
@TiToooTiT 5D2!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
AHHH man did you get both? Money money...
TiToooTiT 9 months ago
good explanation!
DanielJWeiner 10 months ago
kid, whats you age! :D
monizeshan 10 months ago
@monizeshan haha, i'm 20 :P
dipmvideos 10 months ago 3
25-105 IS provides 2 stops more light equivalent to f2.8 plus a longer focal length. But 24-70 is still sexier.
KeijinShiho 10 months ago
@KeijinShiho Could you explain where you're finding 2 extra stops in the 24-105mm lense?
Mexico911 10 months ago
@Mexico911 S, you can hand hold less preferable slower shutter speeds to recieve 2 stops extra exposure without a blurry photo compared to non-IS lenses.
KeijinShiho 10 months ago
@KeijinShiho Oh ok, that I'd agree with. I thought you were referring to a physical attribute of light. Agreed, 1-2 + stops with a steady hand.
Mexico911 10 months ago
@Mexico911 Dont underestimate the capabilities of Image Stabilisation. There is a reason why on lenses such as the 70-200 2.8 IS in which the price is an extra 1k.
KeijinShiho 10 months ago
Ya but which one is sharper? For the 24-104 you can always adjust the ISO in low light situations.
kanehi 10 months ago
Comment removed
KeijinShiho 10 months ago
If you want to do video go the 105
jasp2003 10 months ago
@FlyinangeLproduction if you were to use only one lens, its a very good option i think.
dipmvideos 10 months ago
@FlyinangeLproduction any lens would do. depends on the look you want. a "music video" isn't specific at all. i cant really recommend a lens based on just that. if you're asking if the 24-70 is a good lens for video, then yes.
dipmvideos 10 months ago
@FlyinangeLproduction perfect? i dont think any lens is perfect for that. you need to try it yourself to figure out if its right for you.
dipmvideos 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I was unsure about what of both lens buy. Finally, I decided for the 24-70 mm f2.8 and I'm very happy with it. It's a very versatile lens that covers a lot of common situations, landscapes, portraits, typical tourism photos, and low light conditions, for example museums where no flash is allowed or evening shots. The construction quality is exceptional and it is very very sharp. Taking in account both things the focus distance and aperture I think this is more versatile lens than the 24-105mm
falopio2007 10 months ago
I was unsure about what of both lens buy. Finally, I decided for the 24-70 mm f2.8 and I'm very happy with it. It's a very versatile lens that covers a lot of common situations, landscapes, portraits, typical tourism photos, and low light conditions, for example museums where no flash is allowed or evening shots. The construction quality is exceptional and it is very very sharp. Taking in account both things the focus distance and aperture I think this is more versatile lens than the 24-105mm
falopio2007 10 months ago
@falopio2007 it defiantly is an amazing lens. As to which is more versatile, it really depends on what you'll be using it for. Thanks for watching!
dipmvideos 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm curious, without IS like the 24-105mm f/4L, wouldn't it be harder to get clear shots via hand held with the 24-70mm f/2.8L?
michaelcabrera 10 months ago
sillentkller9, just shut the fuck up already. nobody cares about what you have to say here. move your ass along as the majority here doesn't give a fuck what you say. you fucking first living abortion.
That being said, great review dipmvideos!! Keep up the superb work!
mizike75 10 months ago
Dude im a professional photographer your clearly just some dumb fucking kid with to much money and no idea what the fuck he is talking about
sillentkller9 11 months ago
@sillentkller9 alright, show me your stuff. i'll be the judge of that. its obvious since you have so much time to troll that you're no where near profesional.
dipmvideos 11 months ago 6