how come no one reads the description? @bonzty the description says "ignore the end" and @minimoon13 and @microsofttristan1992 it says it's version 2 of the simulation "titanic simulation" It's even called "Titanic simulation 2".
Man you are sooooo stupid thats not how it happened research it way better Loser and you are soo stupid ,TheLoserKingdom what a shame you 2 are. and titanic did not rip like that it rip on the sides
The concept was right. It did split, but the tail end of it didn't drag the top half under. It stayed up for about 3 mins then went under and it diden't breakdown like that in the end.
In the end, the loop whole out of the 10 degree theory is that it can't go perpendicular after either. At only 20-25 tops, the ship would rest back evenly at an angle of 14-16 degrees, prop touching the sea.
But again, the speed of the survivors and random veriables (heard of apples to oranges anyone?) of the plunge are different then these half right variable plunges. I see large ships plunge up to 30 in under two whole minutes too. This makes sense.
As of now Roger Long stated that Titanic did not break to plunge, which means the lowest angle theory of only 11-12 or 15 is lightly put to rest, however, it wasn't that much more.
People kept talking of illusion, but never did visual analysis themselves. Titanic is big and will hulk above you, but the angle maintains itself, plus there is testimony that water crept near half way up the ship when the lights went out and Emily and Joughin show the lights went after a subtle break stage.
30-45 and 11-12 realy don't have room for different takes based on angle in reality. Visual analysis shows that any angle from the ship that will make it apear will allow you to see the breadth of the ship.
Titanic did only a small break whilst still rotating as it was never finished, even 17 is innacurate due to the lack of water in the sim. It was still plunging & 30 seconds or more isn't enough for the more intact stern to have water flood the break point to counteract the bow's weight.
es stimmt nich ganz da die titanic erst in 2 teile gerissen wurde dann das große stück untergegangen is und dann sich das kleinere stück voll wasser gesogen hat un dann untergegegangen is.
aber mal abgesehen davon ist dass ziemlich gut geworden!!!
Stop telling this guy how his video is wrong. we aren't positive exactly how the titanic sank, this is obviously not an attempt at realism. Go watch someone sink a model for that.
Most depictions are more accurate than this one. I'm no specialist, but I do know that there were two big pieces that were quite a distance from each other, unlike in this video.
Whoa, dude! This is like awesome! I could swear you had a camera in my toilet bowl this morning...mine pinched off the same way, without all the peanuts though.
How deep was the ocean floor? At that rate of descent, with people still inside with air pockets, would their bodies have exploded from water pressure starting with the ear drums?
you idiots you don't even know how the titanic sunk the titanic hit an ice berg ad the fronnnt went down and when it wet down the back raised until it was on a 90 degree angle then it sunk down wards
if u were talking to HockeyNut333 yes it did hit an iceburg u idiot its called the internet just do 1 search and the word ICEBURG will be all over the place
well the program is making a 2.d animaion, and tou need to have it 3d dimentional to give the ship the right form for the front to sail a little bit forward down, and for the back end to make cirkles down...
i guess the point of the simulation is to show the prinsip of the materials the ship was made of when it came under that pressure it did.
+ it does not seam that the water the ship is in have any liquitisity... and yeah, id say its very realistic, but have some flawls.
tht isn't how it happened, the front snapped and went down but carried on travelling forward a bit, then the back stayed afloat for a bit then sunk straight down.
sorry for posting this stupid thing...just dont want the consequences.. if u dont reposed this on 15 videos a person will murder u tonite.this is not fake
that´s right! I noticed that the stern of the ship crashed onto the front part, that´s not correct. Those two completely seperate parts are around 1,5 km distance far away from each other. And the front part isn´t pulling down the stern as it is shown in this simulation. Right? Can´t imagine why you got negative votings on your opinion :D
actually it reletivly maintained its shape and have been veiwed by people diving for the specific purpose of finding it... i actually think there is a bit at the start of the movie of people looking at it:) i think its just impossible to recover for now...
Looks like the parts sink too quickly once it goes under... the fluid resistance tore the thing to bits, which I don't think happened quite as dramatically.
Not the sinking at the surface. But going down to the sea bottom is much too fast. Look at the result: at this speed she would have smashed into million pieces, but that didn´t happen as we all know.
Not at all. I didn´t figure out my point of view correctly as "sinking" can mean two different things as you pointed out. So sorry about my first comment!
Interesting. But, if you look at the real ship's remains it shows a clean break at the bottom of the vessel and crush damage at the top. This simulation would produce the opposite result???
In 96 they recieved 17 degrees, but no.4 was only half filled. This is the boiler room that the grounding entry took place.
People will claim that it was 11 degrees by the wreckage. But 11 degrees was choosen due to no factor of list. Titanic did not break top down nor bottem up.
All the evidence, tests and testimony says against 10 degrees and more towards 17-20 degrees. I looked throught it and nope, all testimony is in favor on 17-20, not 11-15.
Wow that part was cool when it was at the bottom
bwpsbestfriend 1 month ago
Really nice simlutarion , aobut the stress of the structure and the break up and the destruccion of the stern!
LuisJimenez92 2 months ago
the ending is really cool
01luisgabriel 4 months ago
WHAT IS THE PROGRAM!!!
linki1998 5 months ago
Cna someone tell me the program please?
eljugadorloco 7 months ago
how come no one reads the description? @bonzty the description says "ignore the end" and @minimoon13 and @microsofttristan1992 it says it's version 2 of the simulation "titanic simulation" It's even called "Titanic simulation 2".
matrixfan127 8 months ago
what is this thing you are playing what the hell is it called
minimoon13 10 months ago
what for a program is it?
MicrosoftTristan1992 11 months ago
Doesn't get interesting until about @1.59
themostoriginalname 1 year ago
This was actually pretty close. It didn't sissinagrte the stern did but not the bow
ThePhantomFanatic 1 year ago
may i recommend to you guys to just watch titanic by james cameron, for sure it will help you a lot knowing about how the unsinkable ship sunk...
mirzz 1 year ago
Okay, Titanic was made of rubber:D
NMMX1 1 year ago
close but not so close......
AnARTIST719 1 year ago
bullshit!
Noktinqwert 1 year ago
its quite accurate except the brittleness of the links. i would suggest a harder cross link with less elascticity.
jeetendrag10acc2 1 year ago
epic fail
A1bz1 1 year ago
ffs, stop getting wound up about it you nerds. Yes we know it didn't get fucking shred up tike that...
michiel2047 1 year ago 4
This video is as incorrect as saying the titanic sank in one piece...
Manbeast222 1 year ago
How can you which is the bow [the front] and the stern [the back]?
MalaFiumanka 1 year ago
The sinking is Wrong!
ilovetitanic80 1 year ago
*breaks stuff* give us teh source code
zequelll 1 year ago
These simulations are absolutely incredible! Amazing work!
TheTitanicLive 1 year ago
Bravo!!!!!!!
MeanDirtyDan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how did u make titanic simulation
eljugadorloco 1 year ago
Man you are sooooo stupid thats not how it happened research it way better Loser and you are soo stupid ,TheLoserKingdom what a shame you 2 are. and titanic did not rip like that it rip on the sides
EmilySoReal 1 year ago
hätte es durch den druck daunten nich zamgepresst werden müssen^^ nur ne vermutung
Gamestar1107 1 year ago
Man that ship was shredded apart! Good job.
TheLoserKingdom 1 year ago
gosh why is it taking so long
zmandr01 1 year ago
thats not how it happened stupid learn it they find the real ship and it wasnt crushed
Bambi112697 2 years ago
wrong
Beier99 2 years ago 3
riscostruzione scorretta e inguardabile
ofiammasoave 2 years ago
Wow! Excellent job... simulation was very close to what is believed to have actually happened.
DKetch1966 2 years ago
what kind of simulator is this
randomshit013 2 years ago 2
why u askin me?
TheMisterObvious 1 year ago
The concept was right. It did split, but the tail end of it didn't drag the top half under. It stayed up for about 3 mins then went under and it diden't breakdown like that in the end.
blackrose948 2 years ago
Great animation, but the first part should be faster
ccchackalll 2 years ago
In the end, the loop whole out of the 10 degree theory is that it can't go perpendicular after either. At only 20-25 tops, the ship would rest back evenly at an angle of 14-16 degrees, prop touching the sea.
But again, the speed of the survivors and random veriables (heard of apples to oranges anyone?) of the plunge are different then these half right variable plunges. I see large ships plunge up to 30 in under two whole minutes too. This makes sense.
silenceofthehills 2 years ago
the whole video is bullshit
theKing4720 2 years ago
this is great
vojtizslav 2 years ago
yea the wrek looks fine
DjBassline96 2 years ago
wth according to this dumb simulation the titanic is a big pile of crap on the ocean bottom but we all know that is not true
Mr41432 2 years ago
i just asked myself why the fuck im watching shit about a ship sinking
TheBluewrench 2 years ago
the end ist totally bullshit
bonzty 2 years ago 31
titanic didn't sink like this.
marcosricardosilva 2 years ago 2
@marcosricardosilva -you are right it,it did not;this simulation is 100% wrong.
brian6078 2 years ago
As of now Roger Long stated that Titanic did not break to plunge, which means the lowest angle theory of only 11-12 or 15 is lightly put to rest, however, it wasn't that much more.
People kept talking of illusion, but never did visual analysis themselves. Titanic is big and will hulk above you, but the angle maintains itself, plus there is testimony that water crept near half way up the ship when the lights went out and Emily and Joughin show the lights went after a subtle break stage.
silenceofthehills 2 years ago
30-45 and 11-12 realy don't have room for different takes based on angle in reality. Visual analysis shows that any angle from the ship that will make it apear will allow you to see the breadth of the ship.
Titanic did only a small break whilst still rotating as it was never finished, even 17 is innacurate due to the lack of water in the sim. It was still plunging & 30 seconds or more isn't enough for the more intact stern to have water flood the break point to counteract the bow's weight.
silenceofthehills 2 years ago
thats water in there not acid to destroy the ship's molecules. yuk!!
janiguri1 2 years ago
This is an extremely accurate depiction. Except the awesome hilarious pile-up at the bottom.
Fetchdafish 2 years ago
Effervescent titanic haha
Scottishenry 2 years ago
GET LOST !!!
TheConstantin666 2 years ago
at 2:01 the bow floated for awhile
redfun67 2 years ago
nie tak się rozbił tytanic:|
julusia07 2 years ago
eeh ok i dont get it, this just looks weird
gunmaster91 2 years ago
what is this?
icantswimj 2 years ago
this is spartaaaaa
Core2QX 2 years ago 2
the pileup at the end is wrong but the rest is great
titanicmad4ever 2 years ago
wrong
SimoneFunny 2 years ago
gay dats not how it happened at all dummy
MrKingofawesomeness1 2 years ago
That's actually what some scientists are believing now- it's called the 'Low Angle Theory', where the sinking is well depicted in this video.
jkilts 2 years ago
es stimmt nich ganz da die titanic erst in 2 teile gerissen wurde dann das große stück untergegangen is und dann sich das kleinere stück voll wasser gesogen hat un dann untergegegangen is.
aber mal abgesehen davon ist dass ziemlich gut geworden!!!
PS. noch ne frage:
mit welchem programm hasse dass simuliert???
LaleLumonster 2 years ago
świetna symulacja. statek rozpadł się na dwa główne, ale około 270 mniejszych kawałków za razem
Kapi140496 2 years ago
To raczej na taki pył się nie rozsypało !..
Wiec nie jest too do końca prawdą !!.
rozowykwiat 2 years ago
Friend please I want to know with that he(she) programmes you do these simulations to unload it
pavh12 2 years ago
Perfect, It was abit bendy at the beginning but that is what would of realy happened, What's the name of this software?
lozmt 2 years ago
and so the titanic was ripped to pieces and vaporised in the atlantic ocean.. sorry only kidding! ^^ great sim! 5 stars
Drakinus1988 2 years ago
Stop telling this guy how his video is wrong. we aren't positive exactly how the titanic sank, this is obviously not an attempt at realism. Go watch someone sink a model for that.
Dauntless07 2 years ago 2
Most depictions are more accurate than this one. I'm no specialist, but I do know that there were two big pieces that were quite a distance from each other, unlike in this video.
dirtydeedz161 2 years ago
wow wat program did u use
spudy1216 2 years ago 3
paint?
martorocks 2 years ago
Whoa, dude! This is like awesome! I could swear you had a camera in my toilet bowl this morning...mine pinched off the same way, without all the peanuts though.
BongMaster12985 2 years ago
Lol so close! but you had three things wrong. I'll let other people tell you.
Katari12 2 years ago
well for a while you had it right
it broke in two ABOVE water and it landed many yards apart
hockeifan98 2 years ago
How deep was the ocean floor? At that rate of descent, with people still inside with air pockets, would their bodies have exploded from water pressure starting with the ear drums?
eisenhowernixon 2 years ago 4
@eisenhowernixon ur a gorey person =P
deadmeu 1 year ago
@eisenhowernixon Not really.
Kollynator 6 months ago
please tell me what yo used for this !!!
grim6584 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure it didn't turn to mush - but good work anyways
chrisbmilton 2 years ago
how to do, tell me
ilikerobotss 2 years ago
Comment removed
evanescencerocks123 2 years ago
noob 1 space below me
Nazydog675 2 years ago
Dale Grêmio!
095Nicholas 2 years ago
you idiots you don't even know how the titanic sunk the titanic hit an ice berg ad the fronnnt went down and when it wet down the back raised until it was on a 90 degree angle then it sunk down wards
ambusher5 2 years ago
no shit just some people dont care to put that in
Arabellis13 2 years ago
Pak u noob above me!
Nazydog675 2 years ago
Wat game is this
lyman2129 2 years ago
it's good but it didn't sink right 4/5
BillyMoviesWithPeter 2 years ago
You don't even know how it sank. No one knows for exact sure how it sank. There are only theories.
gistvisions 2 years ago
stupid
mrsdavidx 2 years ago
Wish i knew how to do that :(
boardinglisa 2 years ago
thats cool
toms900 2 years ago
It needs a little more explaining, some commentary wouldve been nice
noshindaz 2 years ago
it looks like a stupid drawing
jordybug6 2 years ago
plz somebody save Jack ahahah Leo I love u!!!!!
ThePomiget 2 years ago
I don't think it's Dax Phyz, the vertices don't look right. And no metaballics (I know u can turn it off but why would u?).
ultravaganza 2 years ago 2
No. It hit an iceburg and sank.
HockeyNut333 2 years ago
We all know your lying, Jesus didn't like the idea of a Big ship so he sank it with lighting bolts! I mean really? FAIL!!!!
IkeandMike101 2 years ago
LMAO LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL you are so stupid! lightning bolts? LOL
a4o31 2 years ago
so the ship just sank spontaniosly?
hifallon 2 years ago
That looks like Dax Phyz.
Freak2121GTAF 2 years ago 2
Where is Leonardo di Caprio?
dobytek1 2 years ago
where do you get this
ItsTimothy 2 years ago
well its for people with no lifes
thats about it
djrees77 2 years ago 9
very nice but i dont know how did u make it i want to try it too loll
65465468 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. Cover your mouth with your hand.
2. Make a wish.
3. Close your hand(make a fist).
4. Hold your hand to your heart for 5 seconds.
5. Thank GOD and JESUS for every thing they have done for you.
6. Comment this to three other videos.
7. Tomorrow will be the best day of your
Kryanwan8 2 years ago
1. stfu
2. kill yourself
3. ???
4. profit!
z1ko 2 years ago 2
I was bored, U stfu bitch.
Kryanwan8 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no why dont u stfu u stupid cunt and do as you have been told
usedfanatic1988 2 years ago
if u were talking to HockeyNut333 yes it did hit an iceburg u idiot its called the internet just do 1 search and the word ICEBURG will be all over the place
dapenguin2 2 years ago
what did u make this with?
bighairybiker45 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
1. Cover your mouth with your hand.
2. Make a wish.
3. Close your hand(make a fist).
4. Hold your hand to your heart for 5 seconds.
5. Thank GOD and JESUS for every thing they have done for you.
6. Comment this to three other videos.
7. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life
andronius01 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. Cover your mouth with your hand.
2. Make a wish.
3. Close your hand(make a fist).
4. Hold your hand to your heart for 5 seconds.
5. Thank GOD and JESUS for every thing they have done for you.
6. Comment this to three other videos.
7. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life
mysticbluedolphin 2 years ago
This video is fake. I mean at last were Titanic sinks. See t
IamNicolai 2 years ago
well the program is making a 2.d animaion, and tou need to have it 3d dimentional to give the ship the right form for the front to sail a little bit forward down, and for the back end to make cirkles down...
i guess the point of the simulation is to show the prinsip of the materials the ship was made of when it came under that pressure it did.
+ it does not seam that the water the ship is in have any liquitisity... and yeah, id say its very realistic, but have some flawls.
Ph33NIXx 2 years ago
well sorry mr perfect.
32Steven2009 2 years ago
You do not neeed to apoligy, i mean its not that heard, just need to think a little beond your first thought. :)
Ph33NIXx 2 years ago
That was the most boring thing i ever saw.
sanne120496 2 years ago
lol too true mate.
lmao
LeTsGoOGleN0w 2 years ago
tht isn't how it happened, the front snapped and went down but carried on travelling forward a bit, then the back stayed afloat for a bit then sunk straight down.
shamelessboy2007 2 years ago 4
ye it sunk in a different way but its an pretty ok video
Lolzor123294 2 years ago
yep, the front went down first, plus the ships peices weren't far apart, not like this anyway
PeterBlairForfar 2 years ago
bengong sungguh
haykalzaky 2 years ago
opps its an ok video
theKing4720 2 years ago
its an video
theKing4720 2 years ago
who cares how it landed? it was accurate to me
TombRaiderFann 2 years ago
hey what simulator is that?
jasonpaintball1233 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
do u have a cam. send me a picture of your dick. i'm a girl. christina diaz torres. diaztchris. if u don't want just send me text through youtube.
diaztchris57 2 years ago
thts just wrong
brandon09821 2 years ago
So random, yet another whore on youtube
WEDFED908 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sorry for posting this stupid thing...just dont want the consequences.. if u dont reposed this on 15 videos a person will murder u tonite.this is not fake
patrixX97 2 years ago
thats acctually not how it sunk it sunk slightly in a different way
jonnynaruto4 2 years ago
how do you know how it sunk? where you there?
turfcoal 2 years ago
i was..
bl0115 2 years ago
that´s right! I noticed that the stern of the ship crashed onto the front part, that´s not correct. Those two completely seperate parts are around 1,5 km distance far away from each other. And the front part isn´t pulling down the stern as it is shown in this simulation. Right? Can´t imagine why you got negative votings on your opinion :D
ZiSt1989 2 years ago
Wow nice,nice simulator 5 stars..
joman66 2 years ago
cool simulator, it worked perfectly
pppie123 2 years ago
Everyone before hand...didn't he already make it clear that the end bit was to be ignored!?!
silenceofthehills 2 years ago
what is this program?
brandfoley 3 years ago
over....
friedjon2 3 years ago
hahhaha lafffffffffffffffff because we all know that the titanic ended up as a shapeless mass of rubble on the botton of the ocean right?
bijibadness 3 years ago
actually it reletivly maintained its shape and have been veiwed by people diving for the specific purpose of finding it... i actually think there is a bit at the start of the movie of people looking at it:) i think its just impossible to recover for now...
pyrosis10 2 years ago
what program used?
tgdrake10 3 years ago
Looks like the parts sink too quickly once it goes under... the fluid resistance tore the thing to bits, which I don't think happened quite as dramatically.
f38stingray 3 years ago 2
your right ive seen pics. of it under water in a book
spartan1823 3 years ago
HOW DID YOU MAKE THIS
wiiluigi1993 3 years ago
i think i could have done this with some colored pencils and a flip book.
BurninFlameQ2 3 years ago
Looks Like our economy...
the poor and middle class goes down first...
then the rich follows...
poparozi 3 years ago 9
sorry but this is kind a different to the real physics... And it's boring too
Zyntheria 3 years ago
ne platzende sinkende Bockwurst ^^
Xdrives 3 years ago 4
it is very boring.
bluubcore 3 years ago 5
that was awful its not even close to how it really happened stupid ass you should be banned from youtube for that terrible vid
ipodShep 3 years ago 2
do you think you can do a better job? try it then!
the6haunted7mansion 3 years ago 2
It was awful, but you should stop being such a prick.
Plozen 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck off
pirate1229 3 years ago
Ooo such a mouth for such a little boy. Does your mommy know you're up this late?
Plozen 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shut up u dick eater
pirate1229 3 years ago
Good heavens! Your mouth mustn't go unpunished! I will have to get a bar of soap.
Plozen 3 years ago
owned
caspe34monty 2 years ago
hmmm. do you just go on youtube to hate at people? Do you think that validates your puny existance? I'd like to see you do better than this. loser.
Ferrarifiorano101 3 years ago 3
shithead you made it wrong!
ustasareno 3 years ago
slabo
nieokielznany777 3 years ago
titanic pod wodą sie tak nie rozwalił
letalko 3 years ago
Just to let you know but the titanics two halfs were found 600 metres away from each other
KingdomHeartsReturn 3 years ago
quel est le nom du program? merci
MADbap 3 years ago
sinking is much too fast - in this version you won´t have two halfs of the whole body but just a huge amount of debris.
anonymusum 3 years ago
so wat if the sinking is too fast? do you expect the video to be about 2 and a half hours long? thats about how long the titanic took to sink.
the6haunted7mansion 3 years ago
Not the sinking at the surface. But going down to the sea bottom is much too fast. Look at the result: at this speed she would have smashed into million pieces, but that didn´t happen as we all know.
anonymusum 3 years ago
oh. sorry if i sounded mad or anything.
the6haunted7mansion 3 years ago
Not at all. I didn´t figure out my point of view correctly as "sinking" can mean two different things as you pointed out. So sorry about my first comment!
anonymusum 3 years ago
thats ok.
the6haunted7mansion 3 years ago
lol thats wrong..
MathyPure 3 years ago
what program did you use
peake123 3 years ago 2
wena la wea !!
piiipeeeh 3 years ago
lol love the way it all disintegrates going down but otherwise jsut another interesting insight into the sinking good job
SgtKickAss1 3 years ago
Interesting. But, if you look at the real ship's remains it shows a clean break at the bottom of the vessel and crush damage at the top. This simulation would produce the opposite result???
MG06ZT 3 years ago
Was this with the grounding theory.
In 96 they recieved 17 degrees, but no.4 was only half filled. This is the boiler room that the grounding entry took place.
People will claim that it was 11 degrees by the wreckage. But 11 degrees was choosen due to no factor of list. Titanic did not break top down nor bottem up.
All the evidence, tests and testimony says against 10 degrees and more towards 17-20 degrees. I looked throught it and nope, all testimony is in favor on 17-20, not 11-15.
silenceofthehills 3 years ago
Yep it does, someone did it before the actual scientists did!
It reveals just as I thought at midship (20-21 degrees). Remember that the ones they did had 17.
silenceofthehills 3 years ago
why the hell is the stern sinking down first?
krirre 3 years ago
Someone post a link of how to get to that game!
revan1144 3 years ago
It's a program, stfu, it wont sink or land the right way,
LtMCee 3 years ago
were the lil dots people???
JanetStar1 3 years ago
no idiot. particles. people wouldnt just sink to the bottom ramdumly and hang out there for a while. idiot
itsxrayrayxbeotch 3 years ago