Added: 4 years ago
From: SYHLEF
Views: 455,523
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (330)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow that part was cool when it was at the bottom

  • Really nice simlutarion , aobut the stress of the structure and the break up and the destruccion of the stern!

  • the ending is really cool

  • WHAT IS THE PROGRAM!!!

  • Cna someone tell me the program please?

  • how come no one reads the description? @bonzty the description says "ignore the end" and @minimoon13 and @microsofttristan1992 it says it's version 2 of the simulation "titanic simulation" It's even called "Titanic simulation 2".

  • what is this thing you are playing what the hell is it called

  • what for a program is it?

  • Doesn't get interesting until about @1.59

  • This was actually pretty close. It didn't sissinagrte the stern did but not the bow

  • may i recommend to you guys to just watch titanic by james cameron, for sure it will help you a lot knowing about how the unsinkable ship sunk...

  • Okay, Titanic was made of rubber:D

  • close but not so close......

  • bullshit!

  • its quite accurate except the brittleness of the links. i would suggest a harder cross link with less elascticity.

  • epic fail

  • ffs, stop getting wound up about it you nerds. Yes we know it didn't get fucking shred up tike that...

  • This video is as incorrect as saying the titanic sank in one piece...

  • How can you which is the bow [the front] and the stern [the back]?

  • The sinking is Wrong!

  • *breaks stuff* give us teh source code

  • These simulations are absolutely incredible! Amazing work!

  • Bravo!!!!!!!

  • Man you are sooooo stupid thats not how it happened research it way better Loser and you are soo stupid ,TheLoserKingdom what a shame you 2 are. and titanic did not rip like that it rip on the sides

  • hätte es durch den druck daunten nich zamgepresst werden müssen^^ nur ne vermutung

  • Man that ship was shredded apart! Good job.

  • gosh why is it taking so long

  • thats not how it happened stupid learn it they find the real ship and it wasnt crushed

  • wrong

  • riscostruzione scorretta e inguardabile

  • Wow!  Excellent job... simulation was very close to what is believed to have actually happened.

  • what kind of simulator is this

  • why u askin me?

  • The concept was right. It did split, but the tail end of it didn't drag the top half under. It stayed up for about 3 mins then went under and it diden't breakdown like that in the end.

  • Great animation, but the first part should be faster

  • In the end, the loop whole out of the 10 degree theory is that it can't go perpendicular after either. At only 20-25 tops, the ship would rest back evenly at an angle of 14-16 degrees, prop touching the sea.

    But again, the speed of the survivors and random veriables (heard of apples to oranges anyone?) of the plunge are different then these half right variable plunges. I see large ships plunge up to 30 in under two whole minutes too. This makes sense.

  • the whole video is bullshit

  • this is great

  • yea the wrek looks fine

  • wth according to this dumb simulation the titanic is a big pile of crap on the ocean bottom but we all know that is not true

  • i just asked myself why the fuck im watching shit about a ship sinking

  • the end ist totally bullshit

  • titanic didn't sink like this.

  • @marcosricardosilva -you are right it,it did not;this simulation is 100% wrong.

  • As of now Roger Long stated that Titanic did not break to plunge, which means the lowest angle theory of only 11-12 or 15 is lightly put to rest, however, it wasn't that much more.

    People kept talking of illusion, but never did visual analysis themselves. Titanic is big and will hulk above you, but the angle maintains itself, plus there is testimony that water crept near half way up the ship when the lights went out and Emily and Joughin show the lights went after a subtle break stage.

  • 30-45 and 11-12 realy don't have room for different takes based on angle in reality. Visual analysis shows that any angle from the ship that will make it apear will allow you to see the breadth of the ship.

    Titanic did only a small break whilst still rotating as it was never finished, even 17 is innacurate due to the lack of water in the sim. It was still plunging & 30 seconds or more isn't enough for the more intact stern to have water flood the break point to counteract the bow's weight.

  • thats water in there not acid to destroy the ship's molecules. yuk!!

  • This is an extremely accurate depiction. Except the awesome hilarious pile-up at the bottom.

  • Effervescent titanic haha

  • GET LOST !!!

  • at 2:01 the bow floated for awhile

  • nie tak się rozbił tytanic:|

  • eeh ok i dont get it, this just looks weird

  • what is this?

  • this is spartaaaaa

  • the pileup at the end is wrong but the rest is great

  • wrong

  • gay dats not how it happened at all dummy

  • That's actually what some scientists are believing now- it's called the 'Low Angle Theory', where the sinking is well depicted in this video.

  • es stimmt nich ganz da die titanic erst in 2 teile gerissen wurde dann das große stück untergegangen is und dann sich das kleinere stück voll wasser gesogen hat un dann untergegegangen is.

    aber mal abgesehen davon ist dass ziemlich gut geworden!!!

    PS. noch ne frage:

    mit welchem programm hasse dass simuliert???

  • świetna symulacja. statek rozpadł się na dwa główne, ale około 270 mniejszych kawałków za razem

  • To raczej na taki pył się nie rozsypało !..

    Wiec nie jest too do końca prawdą !!.

  • Friend please I want to know with that he(she) programmes you do these simulations to unload it

  • Perfect, It was abit bendy at the beginning but that is what would of realy happened, What's the name of this software?

  • and so the titanic was ripped to pieces and vaporised in the atlantic ocean.. sorry only kidding! ^^ great sim! 5 stars

  • Stop telling this guy how his video is wrong. we aren't positive exactly how the titanic sank, this is obviously not an attempt at realism. Go watch someone sink a model for that.

  • Most depictions are more accurate than this one. I'm no specialist, but I do know that there were two big pieces that were quite a distance from each other, unlike in this video.

  • wow wat program did u use

  • paint?

  • Whoa, dude! This is like awesome! I could swear you had a camera in my toilet bowl this morning...mine pinched off the same way, without all the peanuts though.

  • Lol so close! but you had three things wrong. I'll let other people tell you.

  • well for a while you had it right

    it broke in two ABOVE water and it landed many yards apart

  • How deep was the ocean floor? At that rate of descent, with people still inside with air pockets, would their bodies have exploded from water pressure starting with the ear drums?

  • @eisenhowernixon ur a gorey person =P

  • @eisenhowernixon Not really.

  • please tell me what yo used for this !!!

  • I'm pretty sure it didn't turn to mush - but good work anyways

  • how to do, tell me

  • Comment removed

  • noob 1 space below me

  • Dale Grêmio!

  • you idiots you don't even know how the titanic sunk the titanic hit an ice berg ad the fronnnt went down and when it wet down the back raised until it was on a 90 degree angle then it sunk down wards

  • no shit just some people dont care to put that in

  • Pak u noob above me!

  • Wat game is this

  • it's good but it didn't sink right 4/5

  • You don't even know how it sank. No one knows for exact sure how it sank. There are only theories.

  • stupid

  • Wish i knew how to do that :(

  • thats cool

  • It needs a little more explaining, some commentary wouldve been nice

  • it looks like a stupid drawing

  • plz somebody save Jack ahahah Leo I love u!!!!!

  • I don't think it's Dax Phyz, the vertices don't look right. And no metaballics (I know u can turn it off but why would u?).

  • No. It hit an iceburg and sank.

  • We all know your lying, Jesus didn't like the idea of a Big ship so he sank it with lighting bolts! I mean really? FAIL!!!!

  • LMAO LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL you are so stupid! lightning bolts? LOL

  • so the ship just sank spontaniosly?

  • That looks like Dax Phyz.

  • Where is Leonardo di Caprio?

  • where do you get this

  • well its for people with no lifes

    thats about it

  • very nice but i dont know how did u make it i want to try it too loll

  • 1. stfu

    2. kill yourself

    3. ???

    4. profit!

  • I was bored, U stfu bitch.

  • if u were talking to HockeyNut333 yes it did hit an iceburg u idiot its called the internet just do 1 search and the word ICEBURG will be all over the place

  • what did u make this with?

  • This video is fake. I mean at last were Titanic sinks. See t

  • well the program is making a 2.d animaion, and tou need to have it 3d dimentional to give the ship the right form for the front to sail a little bit forward down, and for the back end to make cirkles down...

    i guess the point of the simulation is to show the prinsip of the materials the ship was made of when it came under that pressure it did.

    + it does not seam that the water the ship is in have any liquitisity... and yeah, id say its very realistic, but have some flawls.

  • well sorry mr perfect.

  • You do not neeed to apoligy, i mean its not that heard, just need to think a little beond your first thought. :)

  • That was the most boring thing i ever saw.

  • lol too true mate.

    lmao

  • tht isn't how it happened, the front snapped and went down but carried on travelling forward a bit, then the back stayed afloat for a bit then sunk straight down.

  • ye it sunk in a different way but its an pretty ok video

  • yep, the front went down first, plus the ships peices weren't far apart, not like this anyway

  • bengong sungguh

  • opps its an ok video

  • its an video

  • who cares how it landed? it was accurate to me

  • hey what simulator is that?

  • thts just wrong

  • So random, yet another whore on youtube

  • thats acctually not how it sunk it sunk slightly in a different way

  • how do you know how it sunk? where you there?

  • i was..

  • that´s right! I noticed that the stern of the ship crashed onto the front part, that´s not correct. Those two completely seperate parts are around 1,5 km distance far away from each other. And the front part isn´t pulling down the stern as it is shown in this simulation. Right? Can´t imagine why you got negative votings on your opinion :D

  • Wow nice,nice simulator 5 stars..

  • cool simulator, it worked perfectly

  • Everyone before hand...didn't he already make it clear that the end bit was to be ignored!?!

  • what is this program?

  • over....

  • hahhaha lafffffffffffffffff because we all know that the titanic ended up as a shapeless mass of rubble on the botton of the ocean right?

  • actually it reletivly maintained its shape and have been veiwed by people diving for the specific purpose of finding it... i actually think there is a bit at the start of the movie of people looking at it:) i think its just impossible to recover for now...

  • what program used?

  • Looks like the parts sink too quickly once it goes under... the fluid resistance tore the thing to bits, which I don't think happened quite as dramatically.

  • your right ive seen pics. of it under water in a book

  • HOW DID YOU MAKE THIS

  • i think i could have done this with some colored pencils and a flip book.

  • Looks Like our economy...

    the poor and middle class goes down first...

    then the rich follows...

  • sorry but this is kind a different to the real physics... And it's boring too

  • ne platzende sinkende Bockwurst ^^

  • it is very boring.

  • that was awful its not even close to how it really happened stupid ass you should be banned from youtube for that terrible vid

  • do you think you can do a better job? try it then!

  • It was awful, but you should stop being such a prick.

  • Ooo such a mouth for such a little boy. Does your mommy know you're up this late?

  • Good heavens! Your mouth mustn't go unpunished! I will have to get a bar of soap.

  • owned

  • hmmm. do you just go on youtube to hate at people? Do you think that validates your puny existance? I'd like to see you do better than this. loser.

  • shithead you made it wrong!

  • slabo

  • titanic pod wodą sie tak nie rozwalił

  • Just to let you know but the titanics two halfs were found 600 metres away from each other

  • quel est le nom du program? merci

  • sinking is much too fast - in this version you won´t have two halfs of the whole body but just a huge amount of debris.

  • so wat if the sinking is too fast? do you expect the video to be about 2 and a half hours long? thats about how long the titanic took to sink.

  • Not the sinking at the surface. But going down to the sea bottom is much too fast. Look at the result: at this speed she would have smashed into million pieces, but that didn´t happen as we all know.

  • oh. sorry if i sounded mad or anything.

  • Not at all. I didn´t figure out my point of view correctly as "sinking" can mean two different things as you pointed out. So sorry about my first comment!

  • thats ok.

  • lol thats wrong..

  • what program did you use

  • wena la wea !!

  • lol love the way it all disintegrates going down but otherwise jsut another interesting insight into the sinking good job

  • Interesting. But, if you look at the real ship's remains it shows a clean break at the bottom of the vessel and crush damage at the top. This simulation would produce the opposite result???

  • Was this with the grounding theory.

    In 96 they recieved 17 degrees, but no.4 was only half filled. This is the boiler room that the grounding entry took place.

    People will claim that it was 11 degrees by the wreckage. But 11 degrees was choosen due to no factor of list. Titanic did not break top down nor bottem up.

    All the evidence, tests and testimony says against 10 degrees and more towards 17-20 degrees. I looked throught it and nope, all testimony is in favor on 17-20, not 11-15.

  • Yep it does, someone did it before the actual scientists did!

    It reveals just as I thought at midship (20-21 degrees). Remember that the ones they did had 17.

  • why the hell is the stern sinking down first?

  • Someone post a link of how to get to that game!

  • It's a program, stfu, it wont sink or land the right way,

  • were the lil dots people???

  • no idiot. particles. people wouldnt just sink to the bottom ramdumly and hang out there for a while. idiot