ust cuz he has a high back swing doesnt make him a cranker we would actually need to know the rev rate. And MOST cranker finish there slide before they release the ball, he does not. but why do people act like being a tweener isnt ok?
@zakfitz and to discuss your second point you brought up, I agree that most high rev players people see at houses have no control over the backend of their shot. The typical bowler doesn't change hand positions, shorten or lengthen their approach, add or subtract loft to their shot, etc. They're just throwing the ball and hope it somehow gets to the 1-3. It has taken me awhile to barely skim the surface of shot alterations and fully understanding what I can do to control my shot as it goes down
@zakfitz it's not the cranker's fault that houses have made house shots really easy. I'm a cranker myself and the amount of room I have sometimes on league nights is laughable. Whereas in my PBA league I play a lot straighter up the boards since the oil allows it. Technology and decisions that have been made within the bowling industry have made the sport easier for the average bowler to bowl well. Trying to compare bowling in the present to how bowling was in the past is pointless since they'r
I still fail to see anybody give a reason as to why having a cranker style is bad. Getting more revolutions and more rotation is never a bad thing as long as it's controlled and you learn to couple it with a straight game. Anybody who bowls competitively will eventually have to play straighter lines on some patterns and the best in the world always have that to fall on. Belmonte won his first title playing the outside part of one lane with plastic, while TJ won his US Open playing a very straig
@shado3mane I think, and this is just what I've heard while talking to people, that the knocks on crankers come from two things. One, house bowlers get really angry when they see high rev players who have an entire arrow's worth of spray area. So, they hate :) Two, in most higher level play situations, demanding patterns require control of the back end reaction from different launch angles in order to score. Most crankers, with a few notable exceptions, struggle at this by default.
@kellytehuna Part II: The game has changed in this way... before, the friction came from the wood and the ball offered zilch. So anything the ball did was entirely due to the bowler. Today the friction comes primarily from the ball. Also, the various cores act as engines to increase and/or modify rotation. All this, along with gymnastic pins has greatly reduced the bowler's involvement. Btw, Hayden will break your heart in 12 years. Such a doll.
@kellytehuna Your question is legitimate. The term, cranking, came from the hand position and motion around the outside of the ball, like your hand position when using a crank. Mark Roth's track was small as he threw a spinner. Almetto was a small man who tugged a ton at the bottom to compensate the leverage disadvantage (you cannot crank without tugging). A good stroker like Barry Asher or Frank Ellenberg could out rev today's crop with far less effort.
@TreZeryoface hehehehehheheheehehehhehehhehehehehhehehhehehehhehehehhe cwhite32avc told u to go to bed eheheheheehheeheheheehehehehhehhehhehhe arguing on youtube heheheheheheheehehehehheheheheheheh
@BowlingIsLife300 Apparently you're another fourteen year old asian kid whose parents did a poor job instilling any sense of value in you. Your depth is that of a parking lot puddle. Learn something before you ejaculate your opinion everywhere.
@20alphabet I'm pretty sure by how you responded to his comment YOU have depth of a puddle. All you did to respond to him was insult him and not say why you feel cranking is invalid. Obviously Bowlingislife is right about cranking. With all the different oil patterns coming about cranking is rising. I don't know if you are scared of change but its happening. Don't get me wrong i am a stroker and i feel way more consistent doing it because i tried cranking the ball.
@20alphabet I could shoot 150 the first game then shoot 289 the next. But it is foolish to think that cranking is not a good style. Look at Jason Belmo one of the biggest sensations in bowling. He has more titles (all of 2) than people that have been on the tour twice as long as him. He is not necessarily a cranker, but he still has the incredible rev rate of one. Look at Robert Smith tell me one thing that is wrong with his form that makes him bad.
@TreZeryoface Not quite sure what you mean by "Jason Belmo is not a cranker, but has the rev rate of one"... that makes absolutely no sence... The term "cranker" describes the rev rate.. therefore someone throws a certain type of shot whether they are turning the ball a lot(cranker) or staying behind it some (tweener/stroker)...
Even with a 13lb ball these little asian guys like to use it's not good for the elbow. Cranking is a symptom of poor technique, not a style as posers would have you believe.
@20alphabet what the fuck is up your ass? cranking IS a valid form. you want true posers go watch some fucking spinners. bowling is heading for a cranker revolution weather you like it or not, its being taught and there is a right and a wrong way to do it so its clearly NOT poor technique. the next generation of bowlers are emulating crankers like tj, mike fagan, sean rash, and belmo. id learn from pba pros anyday over your sorry ass. if anything stroking is just lacking the ability to crank...
@20alphabet Would you consider Mark Roth and Amleto Moncelli to be crankers or tweeners? How about Chris Barnes? Wes Malott? While there are VERY few true crankers around (plant and pull), there are a large number of bowlers that employ some combination of elbow snap and wrist cup to get the large rev rates that are becoming the norm. When done right, the risk of injury is minimal.
It's in between a cranker and tweener i think, tweeners are more in the center, cranker to the outside, you're in between them, i wouldn't really say cranker just yet.
I really think people need to learn the term craner, tweener and stroker.
It's not solely about the amount of speed and revs one creates, it's more directed to the way one's approach is done.
Meaning this man here is clearly a cranker, there is not a bit of arm straight at the moment he releases, every bit is cupped in to create a powerful ball.
If you don't believe this look at the slowmotion of his back side, notice how his ball comes down with a crooked arm. and notice the dropped shoulder
@supercog23whosdead I guess u must b throwing like him to make u think he's a cranker...such a soft approach n release u call that a cranker? All i c is he's trying hard to b like a cranker, n i think u must b 1 of them...try harder dude...
@SUPERMOOS93 If u notice this guys approach, his 'late timing' isn't there at all. Check out da ball speed down da lane before slow motion it's too slow to be call a cranker. Being a cranker is about being able to put huge amounts of revs on a ball plus fast ball speed down da lane at da same time.
He's not a cranker but he throws the ball great
snowboardrdude 3 weeks ago
ust cuz he has a high back swing doesnt make him a cranker we would actually need to know the rev rate. And MOST cranker finish there slide before they release the ball, he does not. but why do people act like being a tweener isnt ok?
sirtuggsalot 1 month ago
this is cranker, not tweener, 80gerardtan, u're wrong.
akumat1 1 month ago
That was maybe 500 rpms, not a cranker
awashbowler 1 month ago
@zakfitz and to discuss your second point you brought up, I agree that most high rev players people see at houses have no control over the backend of their shot. The typical bowler doesn't change hand positions, shorten or lengthen their approach, add or subtract loft to their shot, etc. They're just throwing the ball and hope it somehow gets to the 1-3. It has taken me awhile to barely skim the surface of shot alterations and fully understanding what I can do to control my shot as it goes down
shado3mane 4 months ago
@zakfitz it's not the cranker's fault that houses have made house shots really easy. I'm a cranker myself and the amount of room I have sometimes on league nights is laughable. Whereas in my PBA league I play a lot straighter up the boards since the oil allows it. Technology and decisions that have been made within the bowling industry have made the sport easier for the average bowler to bowl well. Trying to compare bowling in the present to how bowling was in the past is pointless since they'r
shado3mane 4 months ago
how u do that ish
randy7hunt 5 months ago
I guess they don't have a buzzard when u step on a foul line I was waiting for it
nightwalker2830 5 months ago
cranker jason couch!
papalo1111 6 months ago
@TreZeryoface Go to bed, you have school tomorrow.
20alphabet 7 months ago 7
cranker is obviously a style look up tommy jones and tell me its not a style
Mr30castle 7 months ago
I still fail to see anybody give a reason as to why having a cranker style is bad. Getting more revolutions and more rotation is never a bad thing as long as it's controlled and you learn to couple it with a straight game. Anybody who bowls competitively will eventually have to play straighter lines on some patterns and the best in the world always have that to fall on. Belmonte won his first title playing the outside part of one lane with plastic, while TJ won his US Open playing a very straig
shado3mane 7 months ago
@shado3mane I think, and this is just what I've heard while talking to people, that the knocks on crankers come from two things. One, house bowlers get really angry when they see high rev players who have an entire arrow's worth of spray area. So, they hate :) Two, in most higher level play situations, demanding patterns require control of the back end reaction from different launch angles in order to score. Most crankers, with a few notable exceptions, struggle at this by default.
zakfitz 4 months ago
@kellytehuna Part II: The game has changed in this way... before, the friction came from the wood and the ball offered zilch. So anything the ball did was entirely due to the bowler. Today the friction comes primarily from the ball. Also, the various cores act as engines to increase and/or modify rotation. All this, along with gymnastic pins has greatly reduced the bowler's involvement. Btw, Hayden will break your heart in 12 years. Such a doll.
20alphabet 7 months ago
@kellytehuna Your question is legitimate. The term, cranking, came from the hand position and motion around the outside of the ball, like your hand position when using a crank. Mark Roth's track was small as he threw a spinner. Almetto was a small man who tugged a ton at the bottom to compensate the leverage disadvantage (you cannot crank without tugging). A good stroker like Barry Asher or Frank Ellenberg could out rev today's crop with far less effort.
20alphabet 7 months ago
@TreZeryoface Troll elsewhere. Learn nothing.
20alphabet 7 months ago
@20alphabet You are an ignoramus
TreZeryoface 7 months ago
@TreZeryoface hehehehehheheheehehehhehehhehehehehhehehhehehehhehehehhe cwhite32avc told u to go to bed eheheheheehheeheheheehehehehhehhehhehhe arguing on youtube heheheheheheheehehehehheheheheheheh
cupofjoelm 1 month ago
@cupofjoelm LOL tard that was 5 months over get over it troll
TreZeryoface 1 month ago
@BowlingIsLife300 Apparently you're another fourteen year old asian kid whose parents did a poor job instilling any sense of value in you. Your depth is that of a parking lot puddle. Learn something before you ejaculate your opinion everywhere.
20alphabet 7 months ago
@20alphabet I'm pretty sure by how you responded to his comment YOU have depth of a puddle. All you did to respond to him was insult him and not say why you feel cranking is invalid. Obviously Bowlingislife is right about cranking. With all the different oil patterns coming about cranking is rising. I don't know if you are scared of change but its happening. Don't get me wrong i am a stroker and i feel way more consistent doing it because i tried cranking the ball.
TreZeryoface 7 months ago
@20alphabet I could shoot 150 the first game then shoot 289 the next. But it is foolish to think that cranking is not a good style. Look at Jason Belmo one of the biggest sensations in bowling. He has more titles (all of 2) than people that have been on the tour twice as long as him. He is not necessarily a cranker, but he still has the incredible rev rate of one. Look at Robert Smith tell me one thing that is wrong with his form that makes him bad.
TreZeryoface 7 months ago
@TreZeryoface Not quite sure what you mean by "Jason Belmo is not a cranker, but has the rev rate of one"... that makes absolutely no sence... The term "cranker" describes the rev rate.. therefore someone throws a certain type of shot whether they are turning the ball a lot(cranker) or staying behind it some (tweener/stroker)...
cwhite32avc 7 months ago
@cwhite32avc Yes i agree i have no idea what i was thinking when i said that. But its not like it contradicts my point.
TreZeryoface 7 months ago
調整出来ててとてもお上手だと思うのですが、サムの抜けが遅くて球を撫でてる感じのリリースと、肘が伸びきってるため玉のカップリングが甘いのが上記の「クランカーじゃないねぇ」という理由なのではないでしょうか。もちろんピンが倒れればどうでもいいわけで、こだわりがなければいいスコアが出る投げ方を追求するのが良いかと思います。ぼくもハイレブばかりこだわってレンコン読まずに荒れたボウリングをしていて反省しています。やっぱりある程度以上、倒してナンボですよね。ぼくごときが言うのもなんですが頑張ってください。
inuchanuk 8 months ago
Even with a 13lb ball these little asian guys like to use it's not good for the elbow. Cranking is a symptom of poor technique, not a style as posers would have you believe.
20alphabet 8 months ago
@20alphabet what the fuck is up your ass? cranking IS a valid form. you want true posers go watch some fucking spinners. bowling is heading for a cranker revolution weather you like it or not, its being taught and there is a right and a wrong way to do it so its clearly NOT poor technique. the next generation of bowlers are emulating crankers like tj, mike fagan, sean rash, and belmo. id learn from pba pros anyday over your sorry ass. if anything stroking is just lacking the ability to crank...
BowlingIsLife300 7 months ago
@20alphabet Would you consider Mark Roth and Amleto Moncelli to be crankers or tweeners? How about Chris Barnes? Wes Malott? While there are VERY few true crankers around (plant and pull), there are a large number of bowlers that employ some combination of elbow snap and wrist cup to get the large rev rates that are becoming the norm. When done right, the risk of injury is minimal.
kellytehuna 7 months ago
It's in between a cranker and tweener i think, tweeners are more in the center, cranker to the outside, you're in between them, i wouldn't really say cranker just yet.
MurderousPandas 9 months ago
I really think people need to learn the term craner, tweener and stroker.
It's not solely about the amount of speed and revs one creates, it's more directed to the way one's approach is done.
Meaning this man here is clearly a cranker, there is not a bit of arm straight at the moment he releases, every bit is cupped in to create a powerful ball.
If you don't believe this look at the slowmotion of his back side, notice how his ball comes down with a crooked arm. and notice the dropped shoulder
jimmsr 10 months ago
cranker has high rev and high speed, this guy has neither of those, not even close
BlackHeartedPanda 10 months ago
That is certainly a cranker style, and he is behind the ball.
shawnmedguy 10 months ago
that doesnt even hurt your elbow?
allstarr9tc 11 months ago
What was that first ball?
DrivillianGenocide 1 year ago
whip the elbow and still doesnt even get behind the ball, fail
volodenon 1 year ago
Better start icing that elbow now!! OUCH!!
scottcenter 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nice form , check out my videos
40laszlo 1 year ago
That's a tweener not a cranker...
80gerardtan 1 year ago 18
@80gerardtan You're stupid, that's a cranker look at his a release a tweener has a lot smoother and relaxed release.
supercog23whosdead 7 months ago
@supercog23whosdead I guess u must b throwing like him to make u think he's a cranker...such a soft approach n release u call that a cranker? All i c is he's trying hard to b like a cranker, n i think u must b 1 of them...try harder dude...
80gerardtan 7 months ago
@80gerardtan i have been bowling for 5-6 years and have never heard of these, what are they? and whats the difference?
SUPERMOOS93 4 months ago
@SUPERMOOS93 If u notice this guys approach, his 'late timing' isn't there at all. Check out da ball speed down da lane before slow motion it's too slow to be call a cranker. Being a cranker is about being able to put huge amounts of revs on a ball plus fast ball speed down da lane at da same time.
80gerardtan 4 months ago
@80gerardtan ohh, turns out im a cranker :D
SUPERMOOS93 4 months ago
@80gerardtan ////your wrong
EdwardBaker94 3 months ago
@80gerardtan agree completey
402omb 1 week ago
はじめまして。
さすがナショナル・ユース、きれいなフォームですね~。
makimaki0616 1 year ago